Table 27bOverall grade of the quality of evidence in hypertension studies addressing intermediate outcomes

1Protection against risk of bias (relates to study design, study quality, and reporting bias*High
*Mean Jadad score0.33
2Number of studies6
3Did the studies have important inconsistency?Yes
4Were the studies sparse?No
5Overall grade of evidenceModerate

The Jadad scoring method, and rules for converting the numerical score to a rating for protection against risk of bias are described in the Quality Assessment subsection of Chapter 2, Methods.

The rules for assessing the quantity and consistency of a body of evidence, and combining that with the mean Jadad score to produce the overall grade are described in the Grading of the Evidence subsection of Chapter 2.

From: Results

Cover of Enabling Patient-Centered Care Through Health Information Technology
Enabling Patient-Centered Care Through Health Information Technology.
Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 206.
Finkelstein J, Knight A, Marinopoulos S, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.