NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].
Show detailsAuthors' objectives
To assess the efficacy of noninvasive stimulation at the Neiguan P6 acupoint in reducing nausea and vomiting in pregnant women.
Searching
MEDLINE was searched from 1966, CINAHL from 1982, and PsycINFO from 1967, using the following keywords: 'nausea/vomiting of pregnancy', 'acupressure', 'early pregnancy discomforts', 'pregnancy complications', 'nausea therapies', 'acupuncture', 'pressure', and 'nausea prevention and control'. The reference lists of identified studies were also examined.
Study selection
Study designs of evaluations included in the review
The inclusion criteria were not defined in terms of study design. Included studies were pre-test post-test longitudinal studies and controlled studies, including randomised, crossover, and placebo and non placebo-controlled designs.
Specific interventions included in the review
Studies that examined stimulation at the Neiguan point were considered. Actual interventions were Neiguan point acupressure compared with a sham point, including a dummy point at the elbow, and sensory afferent stimulation. Acupressure was applied via elastic bands (Sea-Bands) or was self-applied, whilst sensory afferent stimulation was applied using a transelectroneurostimulator unit.
Participants included in the review
Pregnant women of gestational age 4 to 23 weeks were considered.
Outcomes assessed in the review
Nausea and vomiting were assessed using a variety of measurement tools. These included a rating scale of emetic complaints, as developed by Dundee et al. (see Other Publications of Related Interest); a Likert type scale; Multiple Affect Adjective Check List; Sickness Impact Profile; daily nausea graph; visual analogue scale; and Rhodes Index of Nausea and Vomiting.
How were decisions on the relevance of primary studies made?
The authors do not state how the papers were selected for the review, or how many of the reviewers performed the selection.
Assessment of study quality
No formal assessment of validity was undertaken, although some aspects of validity were commented upon in the data extraction table and in the text of the review.
Data extraction
The authors do not state how the data were extracted for the review, or how many of the reviewers performed the data extraction. The following information were reported in tabular format: author and year of publication, study design, the number of participants per treatment arm, intervention, outcome measures, and results.
Methods of synthesis
How were the studies combined?
The studies were combined in a narrative review.
How were differences between studies investigated?
Differences were discussed in the text of the review.
Results of the review
Eight studies (702 women) were included: 2 placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over randomised controlled trials (RCTs; n=69), 3 crossover RCTs (n=196), 1 RCT (n=60), one controlled trial (n=350), and one pre-test post-test study (n=27).
Acupressure on nausea and vomiting (7 studies): 6 studies reported significant reductions with acupressure, compared with the control treatment. The study reporting no effect (crossover RCT with 157 women) showed a significant decrease in nausea and vomiting for both active treatment and placebo groups (p<0.0009).
Sensory afferant stimulation (1 randomised cross-over study, the sample size was unclear): 15 out of 25 women reported a significant reduction in nausea and vomiting.
Acupressure and affective state (1 crossover RCT with 16 women): acupressure reduced nausea, anxiety, depression, psychosocial dysfunction, and dysfunction in performing activities of daily living (p<0.05).
There were several methodological flaws associated with the primary studies. These included poor questionnaire response rates; small sample size; women unsure about positioning of self-applied bands; no differentiation between nausea and vomiting; no specification of uni- or bilateral application; lack of control group; inclusion and exclusion criteria were unclear; the estimation of gestational age was described generally, and only 2 studies confirmed gestational age using ultrasound; the pressure application time varied both between and within studies; and in some cases, the placebo control actually caused some surface pressure to the Neiguan point.
Authors' conclusions
The majority of studies demonstrated that acupressure could significantly reduce the amount of nausea and vomiting associated with early pregnancy.
CRD commentary
The aims were stated, and the focus of the review was described in terms of the participants and interventions. The inclusion criteria were not defined in terms of study design or outcome. Three relevant databases were searched and the search terms were specified. However, there was no report of any language restrictions; there was no attempt to locate unpublished material, thus raising the possibility of publication bias; and there were no details provided on the methods used to select studies. The primary studies were not restricted by study design and validity was not formally assessed, though some aspects of validity were commented upon in the data extraction tables and in the text. Some relevant information on the primary studies was presented in tabular format but methods used to extract data were not described. A narrative review was appropriate given the heterogeneity among studies, but evidence from better quality studies was not highlighted. The discussion included consideration of the methodological flaws in the primary studies.
The conclusions should be interpreted with caution given the methodological concerns expressed by the authors, and the lack of detail of the methods used to conduct the review.
Implications of the review for practice and research
Practice: The authors state that acupressure has been proven effective in the relief of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy.
Research: The authors state that the studies need to be replicated using tighter control and should address the weaknesses discussed in this review.
Bibliographic details
Freels D L, Coggins M. Acupressure at the Neiguan P6 point for treating nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy: an evaluation of the literature. Mother Baby Journal 2000; 5(3): 17-22.
Other publications of related interest
Dundee JW, Sourial FB, Ghaly RG, Bell PF. P6 acupressure reduces morning sickness. J R Soc Med 1988;81:456-7.
Indexing Status
Subject indexing assigned by CRD
MeSH
Acupressure; Female; Nausea; Pregnancy Complications; Vomiting
AccessionNumber
Database entry date
31/03/2002
Record Status
This is a critical abstract of a systematic review that meets the criteria for inclusion on DARE. Each critical abstract contains a brief summary of the review methods, results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the review and the conclusions drawn.
- Authors' objectives
- Searching
- Study selection
- Assessment of study quality
- Data extraction
- Methods of synthesis
- Results of the review
- Authors' conclusions
- CRD commentary
- Implications of the review for practice and research
- Bibliographic details
- Other publications of related interest
- Indexing Status
- MeSH
- AccessionNumber
- Database entry date
- Record Status
- Acupressure at the Neiguan P6 point for treating nausea and vomiting in early pr...Acupressure at the Neiguan P6 point for treating nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy: an evaluation of the literature - Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews
- Rectal Bleeding - StatPearlsRectal Bleeding - StatPearls
- Frozen shoulder: What can help? - InformedHealth.orgFrozen shoulder: What can help? - InformedHealth.org
- Agoraphobia - StatPearlsAgoraphobia - StatPearls
- Table 3.10, Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia Criteria Changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5...Table 3.10, Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia Criteria Changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5 - Impact of the DSM-IV to DSM-5 Changes on the National Survey on Drug Use and Health
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...