U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026.

Cover of GeneReviews®

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Show details

MBD4-Related Tumor Predisposition Syndrome

Synonym: MBD4-Associated Neoplasia Syndrome (MANS)

, MD, , PhD, , PhD, and , MD, PhD.

Author Information and Affiliations

Initial Posting: .

Estimated reading time: 23 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome (MBD4-TPDS) is characterized by early-onset gastrointestinal polyposis and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Most reported polyps are adenomatous; some are hyperplastic. Schwannoma, colorectal carcinoma, uveal melanoma, meningioma, and papillary thyroid cancer have been reported in more than one individual with MBD4-TPDS.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of MBD4-TPDS is established in a proband with suggestive findings and biallelic pathogenic variants in MBD4 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Polyp resection during colonoscopy; subtotal colectomy or proctocolectomy when colonoscopy with polypectomy can no longer manage size and density of polyps; standard treatment for AML, MDS, schwannoma, colorectal carcinoma, uveal melanoma, meningioma, and papillary thyroid cancer.

Surveillance: Colonoscopy every two years starting at age 18-20 years; recommended frequency of complete blood count is undetermined; annual dilated eye exam beginning in adulthood; annual assessment for social work, care coordination, and genetic counseling needs.

Evaluation of relatives at risk: Clarify the genetic status of apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk sibs of an individual with MBD4-TPDS in order to identify as early as possible sibs with biallelic MBD4 pathogenic variants who would benefit from appropriate surveillance, early diagnosis, and treatment of MBD4-associated tumors.

Genetic counseling.

MBD4-TPDS is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. If both parents are known to be heterozygous for an MBD4 pathogenic variant, each sib of an affected individual has at conception a 25% chance of inheriting biallelic pathogenic variants and having MBD4-TPDS, a 50% chance of inheriting one pathogenic variant and being heterozygous, and a 25% chance of inheriting neither of the familial pathogenic variants. Heterozygous family members of an individual with MBD4-TPDS have a relative risk of 9.15-31.44 to develop uveal melanoma compared to the general population. Once the MBD4 pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member, heterozygote testing for at-risk relatives and prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Diagnosis

No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome (MBD4-TPDS) have been published.

Suggestive Findings

MBD4-TPDS should be suspected in probands with the following clinical and laboratory findings and family history.

Clinical findings

  • Early-onset gastrointestinal polyposis
  • Acute myeloid leukemia / myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Schwannoma
  • Colorectal carcinoma
  • Uveal melanoma

Molecular findings on tumor tissue. Due to a high accumulation of CpG > TpG variants, COSMIC signature SBS96 is identified on tumor testing (see Molecular Pathogenesis).

Family history is consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance (e.g., affected sibs and/or parental consanguinity). Absence of a known family history does not preclude the diagnosis.

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of MBD4-TPDS is established in a proband with suggestive findings and biallelic pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variants in MBD4 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Note: (1) Per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics / Association for Molecular Pathology variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of biallelic MBD4 variants of uncertain significance (or of one known MBD4 pathogenic variant and one MBD4 variant of uncertain significance) does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, genome sequencing). Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved (see Option 1), whereas comprehensive genomic testing does not (see Option 2).

Option 1

When the phenotypic findings suggest the diagnosis of MBD4-TPDS, molecular genetic testing approaches can include single-gene testing or use of a multigene panel.

  • Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis of MBD4 is performed first to detect missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions. Note: Depending on the sequencing method used, single-exon, multiexon, or whole-gene deletions/duplications may not be detected. If only one or no variant is detected by the sequencing method used, the next step is to perform gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis to detect exon and whole-gene deletions or duplications.
  • A multigene panel that includes MBD4 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
    For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by polyposis and/or early-onset cancers, comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene is likely involved. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible. To date, the majority of MBD4 pathogenic variants reported (e.g., missense, nonsense) are within the coding region and are likely to be identified on exome sequencing.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

MBD4-Related Tumor Predisposition Syndrome: Molecular Genetic Testing

Gene 1MethodProportion of Pathogenic Variants 2 Identified by Method
MBD4 Sequence analysis 3100% 4
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5None reported 4, 6
1.
2.

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in this gene.

3.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

4.
5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Exome and genome sequencing may be able to detect deletions/duplications using breakpoint detection or read depth; however, sensitivity can be lower than gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis.

6.

To date, no large intragenic deletions/duplications have been reported in individuals with MBD4-TPDS.

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome (MBD4-TPDS) is characterized by early-onset gastrointestinal polyposis and acute myeloid leukemia. Schwannoma, colorectal carcinoma, uveal melanoma, meningioma, and papillary thyroid cancers have been reported in more than one individual with MBD4-TPDS. To date, 21 individuals from 18 families have been identified with biallelic pathogenic variants in MBD4 [Sanders et al 2018, Griffin et al 2021, Blombery et al 2022, Palles et al 2022, Cooper et al 2026, Dadi et al 2026, Figueiredo et al 2026, Martins et al 2026, Querido et al 2026]. The following description of the phenotypic features associated with this condition is based on these reports.

Table 2.

MBD4-Related Tumor Predisposition Syndrome: Frequency of Select Features

FeatureProportion of Persons w/Feature
Gastrointestinal polyposis19/21
Acute myeloid leukemia16/21
Schwannoma6/21
Colorectal carcinoma4/21
Uveal melanoma4/21
Meningioma2/21
Papillary thyroid cancer2/21
Ovarian granulosa cell tumor1/21
Basal cell carcinoma1/21
Ductal carcinoma in situ of breast1/21
Liver cysts1/21
Renal cysts1/21
Bone tumor1/21

Gastrointestinal polyposis. All reported individuals evaluated by colonoscopy (n=19) were found to have colorectal polyps, with a range of 5 to 130 polyps [Sanders et al 2018, Griffin et al 2021, Blombery et al 2022, Palles et al 2022, Cooper et al 2026, Figueiredo et al 2026, Martins et al 2026, Querido et al 2026]. Median age at identification of polyps was 34 years (range: age 18-54 years). Most reported polyps were adenomatous. However, four individuals were found to have hyperplastic polyps [Griffin et al 2021, Cooper et al 2026, Querido et al 2026]. Notably, a polyp in one individual had a small focus of intramucosal adenocarcinoma [Querido et al 2026]. One individual had an upper gastrointestinal tract tubulovillous adenoma as well as colorectal polyps [Palles et al 2022]. Colectomy was the only reported treatment (n=10), with a median age of 38 years (range: age 31-53 years). In one individual, polyps were found in the remaining colon after hemicolectomy [Palles et al 2022].

Colorectal cancer. Four out of 21 (19%) individuals developed colorectal cancer. Ages at diagnosis were 30, 33, 40, and 52 years [Sanders et al 2018, Figueiredo et al 2026, Martins et al 2026, Querido et al 2026].

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was observed in 16 individuals [Sanders et al 2018, Griffin et al 2021, Blombery et al 2022, Palles et al 2022, Cooper et al 2026, Figueiredo et al 2026, Querido et al 2026]. The median age of diagnosis was 35 years (range: age 27-55 years). Notably, 13/16 individuals were diagnosed before age 40 years. In two individuals, AML was preceded by myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) [Blombery et al 2022, Palles et al 2022]. In 13/16 (81%) individuals with AML, identification of gastrointestinal polyposis preceded the diagnosis of AML.

Schwannoma. Six individuals were diagnosed with a schwannoma [Griffin et al 2021, Blombery et al 2022, Palles et al 2022, Cooper et al 2026, Querido et al 2026]. When specified, reported ages at diagnosis were 30, 34, 44, 45, and 50 years. Reported tumor locations included chest wall, cervical [Palles et al 2022], (right) vestibular [Blombery et al 2022, Cooper et al 2026], and bilateral vestibular [Griffin et al 2021, Cooper et al 2026].

Uveal melanoma. Four individuals were diagnosed with uveal melanoma [Palles et al 2022, Figueiredo et al 2026, Martins et al 2026]. One individual was diagnosed with two uveal melanomas at ages 38 and 45 years (location was not reported). The other individuals were diagnosed at age 33, 53, and 61 years. Notably, one individual was simultaneously diagnosed with bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP) [Figueiredo et al 2026]. Systemic workup showed a hypermetabolic nodule in hepatic segment V, warranting close surveillance.

Meningioma. To date, two individuals have been reported with meningiomas; age at diagnosis was 41 and 55 years [Palles et al 2022, Querido et al 2026].

Papillary thyroid cancer. Two individuals have been reported with papillary thyroid cancer, both diagnosed at age 44 [Griffin et al 2021, Cooper et al 2026].

Other

  • Ovarian granulosa cell tumor (1 individual) diagnosed at age 12 years [Palles et al 2022].
  • Basal cell carcinoma (1 individual) diagnosed at age 33 years [Querido et al 2026]
  • Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (1 individual) diagnosed at age 50 years [Palles et al 2022]
  • Multiple liver cysts (1 individual) identified at age 53 years [Palles et al 2022]
  • Kidney cysts. Small bilateral kidney cysts (1 individual) identified at age 53 years [Palles et al 2022]
  • Bone tumor. One individual presented with a benign bone tumor at age 38 years [Querido et al 2026]. Distinction between giant cell tumor or aneurysmal bone cyst could not be established.

Heterozygotes. An increased risk of uveal melanoma has been reported in MBD4 heterozygotes [Rodrigues et al 2018, Johansson et al 2019, Repo et al 2020, Derrien et al 2021, Saint-Ghislain et al 2022, Villy et al 2024, Byrne et al 2026, Le Ven et al 2026]. The prevalence of heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in MBD4 among individuals with uveal melanoma is 0%-2.6% [Repo et al 2020, Derrien et al 2021, Saint-Ghislain et al 2022, Le Ven et al 2026]. A relative risk of 9.15-31.44 for uveal melanoma was reported in individuals heterozygous for a germline MBD4 pathogenic variant compared to the general population [Derrien et al 2021, Le Ven et al 2026].

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

No clinically relevant genotype-phenotype correlations have been identified.

Penetrance

To date, no unaffected individuals with biallelic germline MBD4 pathogenic variants have been reported. Given the limited number of individuals identified to date with MBD4-TPDS, it is difficult to confirm complete penetrance in all individuals.

Prevalence

To date, 21 individuals with MBD4-TPDS have been reported. The estimated population incidence is less than one in 1,000,000 [Terradas et al 2023].

A suspected ancient founder pathogenic variant (c.1544-1G>T) has been reported in several populations [Querido et al 2026]. Another founder pathogenic variant (c.612_615delCTCT) was reported in Israeli Christian Arabs [Dadi et al 2026].

Differential Diagnosis

Tumor predisposition syndromes of interest in the differential diagnosis of MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome (MBD4-TPDS) are listed in Table 3.

Table 3.

MBD4-Related Tumor Predisposition Syndrome: Genetic Differential Diagnosis

Gene 1DisorderMOIFeatures Similar to MBD4-TPDSFeatures Distinct from MBD4-TPDS
MSH3 Familial adenomatous polyposis 4 (OMIM 617100)AR
  • ↑ CRC risk
  • 10-100 adenomas
No reported AML
MUTYH MUTYH polyposis AR
  • ↑ CRC risk
  • 10-100 adenomas
  • Duodenal adenomas
  • ↑ duodenal cancer risk
  • ↑ ovarian & bladder cancer risk
  • Benign findings: thyroid nodules, jawbone cysts, adrenal lesions, & CHRPE
NTHL1 NTHL1 tumor syndrome AR
  • ↑ CRC risk
  • 2-150 adenomas
↑ breast cancer risk
APC Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (See APC-Associated Polyposis Conditions.)AD
  • ↑ CRC risk
  • Average of 30 colonic polyps
Extracolonic manifestations: polyps of stomach & duodenum, osteomas, dental abnormalities, CHRPE, benign cutaneous lesions, desmoid tumors, & adrenal masses
BAP1 BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome AD
  • ↑ uveal melanoma risk
  • Polyposis reported in 2 persons
↑ mesothelioma, renal cell carcinoma, & cutaneous melanoma risk
BMPR1A
SMAD4
Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS)AD↑ CRC risk
  • GI hamartomatous polyps
  • ↑ risk for upper GI tract malignancies & pancreas
  • HHT (SMAD4-related JPS/HHT)
CEBPA CEBPA-associated familial AML AD↑ AML riskNo other malignancies assoc w/MBD4-TPDS
EPCAM
MLH1
MSH2
MSH6
PMS2
Lynch syndrome AD↑ CRC risk
  • ↑ endometrial cancer risk
  • ↑ ovarian cancer risk
  • Sebaceous skin tumors
  • Mismatch repair-deficient tumors
DDX41 DDX41-associated familial MDS & AML AD↑ AML/MDS riskLymphoid malignancies
DGCR8 DGCR8-related schwannomatosis 1ADMultiple schwannomas
  • No vestibular schwannomas
  • No other malignancies assoc w/MBD4-TPDS
GATA2 GATA2 deficiency 2AD↑ AML/MDS risk
  • No other malignancies assoc w/MBD4-TPDS
  • Primary lymphedema, multiple warts, deafness, & minor anomalies (mild hypotelorism, neck webbing, & slender fingers) (Emberger syndrome)
15q13-q14 duplication (upstream of GREM1)Hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome 1 (OMIM 601228)AD
  • Adenomatous polyps
  • ↑ CRC risk
Mixed polyposis (hyperplastic, atypical juvenile, & adenomatous polyps)
LZTR1
SMARCB1
LZTR1- & SMARCB1-related schwannomatosis ADMultiple schwannomas
  • No bilateral vestibular schwannomas
  • No ↑ risk for other malignancies
NF2 NF2-related schwannomatosis AD
  • (Bilateral) vestibular schwannomas
  • Meningiomas
  • No AML or polyposis
  • In children: cortical wedge cataract, retinal hamartoma, mononeuropathy
POLD1 CRC, susceptibility to, 10 (OMIM 612591)AD
  • 7-70 adenomas
  • ↑ CRC risk
↑ breast & endometrial cancer risk
POLE CRC, susceptibility to, 12 (OMIM 615083)AD
  • 0-100 adenomas
  • ↑ CRC risk
  • ↑ risk for endometrium, ovarian, & duodenum cancer
  • ↑ risk for brain tumors
PTEN Cowden syndrome (See PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome.)AD↑ CRC risk
  • ↑ risk for benign & malignant tumors of thyroid, breast, kidney, & endometrium
  • Macrocephaly, trichilemmomas, & papillomatous papules
RUNX1 RUNX1 familial platelet disorder w/associated myeloid malignancies AD↑ AML/MDS riskNo other malignancies assoc w/MBD4-TPDS
STK11 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome AD↑ CRC risk
  • Hamartomatous polyps, most often in small bowel
  • Typical mucocutaneous pigmentation
  • ↑ risk for gastric, pancreatic, breast, & ovarian cancer
TERC Dyskeratosis congenita; pulmonary fibrosis predispositionAD↑ AML/MDS risk
  • Pulmonary & hepatic fibrosis
  • Squamous cell carcinomas
  • Abnormal skin pigmentation, leukoplakia, & nail dystrophy
  • Premature graying of hair, osteoporosis, epiphora, dental abnormalities, testicular atrophy, & GI disease
TERT Dyskeratosis congenita; pulmonary fibrosis predisposition; AML (OMIM 601626); melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 9 (OMIM 615134)AD
AR
↑ AML/MDS risk
  • Cutaneous melanoma
  • Pulmonary & liver fibrosis, premature graying of hair, immunodeficiency, & GI telangiectasias
TP53 Li-Fraumeni syndrome AD
  • ↑ CRC risk
  • Leukemia reported
↑ risk for adrenocortical carcinomas, breast cancer, central nervous system tumors, osteosarcomas, & soft-tissue sarcomas

↑ = increased; AD = autosomal dominant; AML = acute myeloid leukemia; AR = autosomal recessive; CHRPE = congenital hypertrophy of retinal pigment epithelium; CRC = colorectal cancer; GI = gastrointestinal; HHT = hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia; MBD4-TPDS = MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; MOI = mode of inheritance

1.
2.

Management

No clinical practice guidelines for MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome (MBD4-TPDS) have been published. In the absence of published guidelines, the following recommendations are based on the authors' personal experience managing individuals with this disorder.

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with MBD4-TPDS, the evaluations summarized in Table 4 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 4.

MBD4-Related Tumor Predisposition Syndrome: Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

System/ConcernEvaluationComment
GI polyposis /
Colorectal cancer
ColonoscopyBeginning at age 18-20 yrs
AML Complete blood count
  • Beginning in adults at diagnosis
  • Note: To date, youngest person diagnosed w/AML was age 27 yrs.
Cascade testing of family membersIf proband presents w/AML, MBD4 molecular genetic testing for any family member being considered as hematopoietic stem cell donor.
Uveal melanoma Dilated eye exam
  • Beginning in adults at diagnosis
  • Note: To date, youngest persons diagnosed w/uveal melanoma was age 33 yrs.
Genetic counseling By genetics professionals 1To obtain a pedigree & inform affected persons & their families re nature, MOI, & implications of MBD4-TPDS to facilitate medical & personal decision making

AML = acute myeloid leukemia; GI = gastrointestinal; MBD4-TPDS = MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome; MOI = mode of inheritance

1.

Clinical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, certified genetic nurse, genetics advanced practice provider (nurse practitioner or physician assistant)

Treatment of Manifestations

Supportive care to improve quality of life, maximize function, and reduce complications is recommended. This ideally involves multidisciplinary care by specialists in relevant fields (see Table 5).

Table 5.

MBD4-Related Tumor Predisposition Syndrome: Treatment of Manifestations

Manifestation/ConcernTreatmentConsiderations/Other
GI polyposis /
Colorectal cancer
  • Polyp resection during colonoscopy
  • Based on polyp features & locations, subtotal colectomy or proctocolectomy is suggested when colonoscopy w/polypectomy can no longer manage large size & density of polyps. 1
AML Standard treatmentsMolecular genetic testing for MBD4 pathogenic variants present in proband should be performed in any family member being considered as hematopoietic stem cell donor.
Schwannoma
Colorectal carcinoma
Uveal melanoma Persons w/metastatic MBD4-deficient uveal melanomas might benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. 2
Meningioma
Papillary thyroid cancer

Surveillance

To monitor existing manifestations, the individual's response to supportive care, and the emergence of new manifestations, the evaluations summarized in Table 6 are recommended.

Table 6.

MBD4-Related Tumor Predisposition Syndrome: Recommended Surveillance

System/ConcernEvaluationFrequency
GI polyposis /
Colorectal cancer
ColonoscopyEvery 2 years, starting at age 18-20 yrs
AML Complete blood count
  • There is no consensus on recommended frequency of CBC in persons w/MBD4-TPDS.
  • Surveillance is advised only in adults.
  • Note: To date, youngest person diagnosed w/AML was age 27 yrs.
Uveal melanoma Dilated eye exam
  • Annual surveillance beginning in adulthood
  • Note: To date, youngest person diagnosed w/uveal melanoma was age 33 yrs.
Psychosocial/
Community
Assess need for social work support (e.g., palliative/respite care, home nursing, other local resources), care coordination, or follow-up genetic counseling if new questions arise (e.g., family planning).Annually

AML = acute myeloid leukemia; CBC = complete blood count; GI = gastrointestinal; MBD4-TPDS = MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

It is appropriate to clarify the genetic status of apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk sibs of an individual with MBD4-TPDS in order to identify as early as possible sibs with biallelic MBD4 pathogenic variants who would benefit from appropriate surveillance, early diagnosis, and treatment of MBD4-associated tumors. For unaffected individuals with biallelic MBD4 pathogenic variants, surveillance should begin by age 18-20 years.

In general, molecular genetic testing for MBD4-TPDS is not recommended for at-risk individuals younger than age 18 years. However, predictive testing should be considered if there is a history of early-onset cancer in the family. A history of early cancers in the family may warrant testing prior to age 18 [NCCN 2024].

Heterozygous family members

  • Currently, there is no evidence that individuals with a heterozygous MBD4 pathogenic variant have a comparable increased risk to develop colorectal cancer (CRC) and/or polyposis [Sherwood et al 2026]. No colonoscopy surveillance beyond population screening or local guidelines based on familial history for CRC is recommended.
  • Compared to the general population, a relative risk of 9.15-31.44 to develop uveal melanoma has been reported in individuals with a heterozygous MBD4 pathogenic variant [Derrien et al 2021, Le Ven et al 2026]. However, based on the low incidence of uveal melanoma, ophthalmologic surveillance for uveal melanoma is not recommended for family members who have heterozygous MBD4 pathogenic variants (see Clinical Description, Heterozygotes.)

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome (MBD4-TPDS) is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • The parents of an affected individual are presumed to be heterozygous for an MBD4 pathogenic variant.
  • Molecular genetic testing is recommended for the parents of the proband to confirm that both parents are heterozygous for an MBD4 pathogenic variant and to allow reliable recurrence risk assessment.
  • If a pathogenic variant is detected in only one parent and parental identity testing has confirmed biological maternity and paternity, it is possible that one of the pathogenic variants identified in the proband occurred as a de novo event in the proband or as a postzygotic de novo event in a mosaic parent [Jónsson et al 2017]. If the proband appears to have homozygous pathogenic variants (i.e., the same two pathogenic variants), additional possibilities to consider include:
  • Heterozygous parents of an individual with MBD4-TPDS have a relative risk of 9.15-31.44 of developing uveal melanoma compared to the general population [Derrien et al 2021, Le Ven et al 2026]. However, due to the low incidence of uveal melanoma, ophthalmologic surveillance for uveal melanoma is not recommended (see Clinical Description, Heterozygotes).

Sibs of a proband

  • If both parents are known to be heterozygous for an MBD4 pathogenic variant, each sib of an affected individual has at conception a 25% chance of inheriting biallelic pathogenic variants and having MBD4-TPDS, a 50% chance of inheriting one pathogenic variant and being heterozygous, and a 25% chance of inheriting neither of the familial pathogenic variants.
  • Heterozygous sibs of an individual with MBD4-TPDS have a relative risk of 9.15-31.44 of developing uveal melanoma compared to the general population [Derrien et al 2021, Le Ven et al 2026]. However, due to the low incidence of uveal melanoma, ophthalmologic surveillance for uveal melanoma is not recommended (see Clinical Description, Heterozygotes).

Offspring of a proband. Unless an affected individual's reproductive partner also has MBD4-TPDS or is heterozygous for an MBD4 pathogenic variant, offspring will be obligate heterozygotes for a pathogenic variant in MBD4.

Other family members. Each sib of the proband's parents is at a 50% risk of being heterozygous for an MBD4 pathogenic variant.

Heterozygote Detection

Heterozygote testing for at-risk relatives requires prior identification of the MBD4 pathogenic variants in the family.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

See Management, Evaluation of Relatives at Risk for information on evaluating at-risk sibs for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment.

Predictive testing for at-risk asymptomatic sibs requires prior identification of the germline MBD4 pathogenic variants in the family.

Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling. For a comprehensive description of the medical, psychosocial, and ethical ramifications of identifying at-risk individuals through cancer risk assessment with or without molecular genetic testing, see Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment and Counseling – Health Professional Version (part of PDQ®, National Cancer Institute).

Family planning

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the MBD4 pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing. While most health care professionals would consider decisions regarding prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing to be the choice of the parents, discussion of these issues is appropriate.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A.

MBD4-Related Tumor Predisposition Syndrome: Genes and Databases

GeneChromosome LocusProteinHGMDClinVar
MBD43q21​.3Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4MBD4MBD4

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from HGNC; chromosome locus from OMIM; protein from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click here.

Table B.

OMIM Entries for MBD4-Related Tumor Predisposition Syndrome (View All in OMIM)

603574METHYL-CpG-BINDING DOMAIN PROTEIN 4; MBD4
606660MELANOMA, UVEAL, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 1; UVM1
619975TUMOR PREDISPOSITION SYNDROME 2; TPDS2

Molecular Pathogenesis

MBD4 encodes methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4 (MBD4), a DNA glycosylase that identifies and removes mismatched bases that arise from the naturally occurring deamination of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and cytosine at CpG sites [Koliadenko & Wilanowski 2020]. MBD4 prevents further accumulation of C-to-T transitions upon DNA replications. MBD4 loss-of-function variants lead to an accumulation of CpG > TpG variants (COSMIC signature SBS96) [Degasperi et al 2022, Palles et al 2022], therefore likely leading to a higher tumor mutational burden.

Mice studies have shown that biallelic inactivation of MBD4 by itself does not cause cancer predisposition; it can alter the mutation spectrum in cancer cells and modify the cancer predisposition phenotype [Wong et al 2002, Sansom et al 2004].

Molecular testing in adenomas of individuals with MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome (MBD4-TPDS) show similar driver pathogenic variants as those found in sporadic adenomas (e.g., APC, TTN, AMER1, and KRAS) [Sanders et al 2018, Palles et al 2022, Cooper et al 2026].

Notably, somatic pathogenic variants identified in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in individuals with MBD4-TPDS include biallelic DNMT3A pathogenic variants as well as IDH1 or IDH2 hot spot pathogenic variants. These are relatively rare pathogenic variants (<3%) in sporadic AML [Sanders et al 2018, Griffin et al 2021, Blombery et al 2022, Cooper et al 2026, Dadi et al 2026].

Molecular testing was performed on three vestibular schwannomas from individuals with MBD4-TPDS. In all instances biallelic NF2 pathogenic variants were identified in tumor tissue. Acquired NF2 pathogenic variants are ubiquitous early molecular events in sporadic vestibular schwannomas [Griffin et al 2021, Blombery et al 2022, Cooper et al 2026].

Mechanism of disease causation. Loss of function

Table 7.

MBD4 Pathogenic Variants Referenced in This GeneReview

Reference SequencesDNA Nucleotide Change
(Alias 1)
Predicted Protein ChangeComment [Reference]
NM_001276270​.2 c.1544-1G>T
(IVS7-1G>T)
--Suspected ancient founder pathogenic variant reported in several populations [Querido et al 2026]
NM_001276270​.2
NP_001263200​.1
c.612_615delCTCTp.Ser205ThrfsTer9Founder pathogenic variant reported in Israeli Christian Arabs [Dadi et al 2026]

Variants listed in the table have been provided by the authors. GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.

GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen​.hgvs.org). See Quick Reference for an explanation of nomenclature.

1.

Variant designation that does not conform to current naming conventions

Chapter Notes

Author Notes

Coen Bijns (ln.cmul@snjib.m.c), Claire Palles (ku.ca.mahb@sellap.c), Richarda de Voer (ln.cmuduobdar@reoved.adrahcir), and Maartje Nielsen (ln.cmul@neslein.m) are actively involved in clinical research regarding individuals with MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome (MBD4-TPDS). They would be happy to communicate with individuals who have questions regarding diagnosis of MBD4-TPDS or other considerations.

Revision History

  • 13 August 2026 (sw) Review posted live
  • 21 January 2026 (cb) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • Blombery P, Ryland GL, Fox LC, Stark Z, Wall M, Jarmolowicz A, Roesley A, Thompson ER, Grimmond SM, Panicker S, Kwok F. Methyl-CpG binding domain 4, DNA glycosylase (MBD4)-associated neoplasia syndrome associated with a homozygous missense variant in MBD4: Expansion of an emerging phenotype. Br J Haematol. 2022;198:196-9. [PubMed: 35381620]
  • Byrne L, Gray I, Ramsey K, McElroy J, Schreiner E, Wolfe J, Taylor OB, Davidorf F, Cebulla CM, Abdel-Rahman MH. Impact of multigene panel testing in high-risk uveal melanoma patients. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2026;39:e70108. [PMC free article: PMC13356236] [PubMed: 42415513]
  • Calvo KR, Hickstein DD. The spectrum of GATA2 deficiency syndrome. Blood. 2023;141:1524-32. [PMC free article: PMC10082373] [PubMed: 36455197]
  • Cooper J, Stewart BL, Bokovitz L, Carraway H, Mukherjee S, Liska D, Vasu S, Lesmana H, Blachly JS. Biallelic germline MBD4 mutations predispose to colorectal polyposis, hypermutated AML, and schwannomas. Fam Cancer. 2026;25:50. [PMC free article: PMC13156161] [PubMed: 42101541]
  • Dadi G, Rosen S, Naor H, Hellou E, Chapal-Ilani N, Bacharach T, Kaushansky N, Shlush LL. A founder heterozygous mutation in Methyl-CpG binding domain protein 4 (MBD4) prevalent among Israeli Christian Arabs predisposes to increased mutagenesis. Haematologica. 2026;111:1034-38. [PMC free article: PMC12951175] [PubMed: 40905073]
  • Degasperi A, Zou X, Amarante TD, Martinez-Martinez A, Koh GCC, Dias JML, Heskin L, Chmelova L, Rinaldi G, Wang VYW, Nanda AS, Bernstein A, Momen SE, Young J, Perez-Gil D, Memari Y, Badja C, Shooter S, Czarnecki J, Brown MA, Davies HR, Genomics England Research C, Nik-Zainal S. Substitution mutational signatures in whole-genome-sequenced cancers in the UK population. Science. 2022;376:science.abl9283. [PMC free article: PMC7613262] [PubMed: 35949260]
  • Derrien AC, Rodrigues M, Eeckhoutte A, Dayot S, Houy A, Mobuchon L, Gardrat S, Lequin D, Ballet S, Pierron G, Alsafadi S, Mariani O, El-Marjou A, Matet A, Colas C, Cassoux N, Stern MH. Germline MBD4 mutations and predisposition to uveal melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113:80-7. [PMC free article: PMC7781447] [PubMed: 32239153]
  • Figueiredo I, Maia S, Simoes P, Fonseca C. Diagnostic pitfall in MBD4-associated neoplasia syndrome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2026. Epub ahead of print. [PubMed: 41942066]
  • Griffin BL, Majhail NS, Lesmana H. Germline biallelic loss in leading to early onset AML with hyper-mutator genomic signature. Blood. 2021;138:3385-.
  • Johansson PA, Stark A, Palmer JM, Bigby K, Brooks K, Rolfe O, Pritchard AL, Whitehead K, Warrier S, Glasson W, Hayward NK. Prolonged stable disease in a uveal melanoma patient with germline MBD4 nonsense mutation treated with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab. Immunogenetics. 2019;71:433-6. [PubMed: 30714079]
  • Jónsson H, Sulem P, Kehr B, Kristmundsdottir S, Zink F, Hjartarson E, Hardarson MT, Hjorleifsson KE, Eggertsson HP, Gudjonsson SA, Ward LD, Arnadottir GA, Helgason EA, Helgason H, Gylfason A, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, Rafnar T, Frigge M, Stacey SN, Th Magnusson O, Thorsteinsdottir U, Masson G, Kong A, Halldorsson BV, Helgason A, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson K. Parental influence on human germline de novo mutations in 1,548 trios from Iceland. Nature. 2017;549:519-22. [PubMed: 28959963]
  • Koliadenko V, Wilanowski T. Additional functions of selected proteins involved in DNA repair. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;146:1-15. [PubMed: 31639437]
  • Le Ven A, Villy MC, Le Mentec M, Houy A, Dubois d'Enghien C, Matet A, Malaise D, Bubien V, Lortholary A, Ait Omar A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Cassoux N, Rodrigues M, Golmard L, Stern MH, Colas C. Prevalence of the predisposing gene MBD4 for uveal melanoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2026;144:536-40. [PMC free article: PMC13133719] [PubMed: 42060275]
  • Lipton L, Tomlinson I. The genetics of FAP and FAP-like syndromes. Fam Cancer. 2006;5:221-6. [PubMed: 16998667]
  • Martins N, Terradas M, Garcia-Pelaez J, Sommer AK, Demidov G, Matalonga L, Ramos-Muntada M, Te Paske I, Spier I, Mensenkamp A, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers J, Gullo I, Sao Jose C, Pedro AM, Gouveia Silva R, Sousa AB, Amoroso Canao P, Fernandes S, Garrido L, Dupont J, Maia S, Sousa G, Irmejs A, Barili V, Blatnik A, Rofes P, Brunet J, Capella G, Laurie S, Lazaro C, Hoogerbrugge N, de Voer RM, Aretz S, Oliveira C, Valle L. Genome sequencing of undiagnosed European patients suspected of hereditary cancer: diagnostic yield and identification of candidate causative variants. JCO Precis Oncol. 2026;10:e2500354. [PMC free article: PMC13098671] [PubMed: 41990296]
  • NCCN. NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2024 Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Endometrial, and Gastric. 2024. Available online (purchase or subscription required).
  • Nogué C, Chong AS, Grau E, Han H, Dorca E, Roca C, Mosquera JL, Lázaro C, Foulkes WD, Brunet J, Rivera B. DGCR8 and the six hit, three-step model of schwannomatosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2022;143:115-7. [PubMed: 34821987]
  • Palles C, West HD, Chew E, Galavotti S, Flensburg C, Grolleman JE, Jansen EAM, Curley H, Chegwidden L, Arbe-Barnes EH, Lander N, Truscott R, Pagan J, Bajel A, Sherwood K, Martin L, Thomas H, Georgiou D, Fostira F, Goldberg Y, Adams DJ, van der Biezen SAM, Christie M, Clendenning M, Thomas LE, Deltas C, Dimovski AJ, Dymerska D, Lubinski J, Mahmood K, van der Post RS, Sanders M, Weitz J, Taylor JC, Turnbull C, Vreede L, van Wezel T, Whalley C, Arnedo-Pac C, Caravagna G, Cross W, Chubb D, Frangou A, Gruber AJ, Kinnersley B, Noyvert B, Church D, Graham T, Houlston R, Lopez-Bigas N, Sottoriva A, Wedge D, Genomics England Research C, Consortium C, Consortium WGS, Jenkins MA, Kuiper RP, Roberts AW, Cheadle JP, Ligtenberg MJL, Hoogerbrugge N, Koelzer VH, Rivas AD, Winship IM, Ponte CR, Buchanan DD, Power DG, Green A, Tomlinson IPM, Sampson JR, Majewski IJ, de Voer RM. Germline MBD4 deficiency causes a multi-tumor predisposition syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109:953-60. [PMC free article: PMC9118112] [PubMed: 35460607]
  • Perez-Becerril C, Evans DG, Smith MJ. Pathogenic noncoding variants in the neurofibromatosis and schwannomatosis predisposition genes. Hum Mutat. 2021;42:1187-207. [PubMed: 34273915]
  • Querido I, Pinto C, Arinto P, Brandao A, Santos C, Pinheiro M, Guerra J, Silva J, Peixoto A, Teixeira MR. A novel deleterious variant and a founder effect in four new families of MBD4-associated neoplasia syndrome recruited over a period of 20 years. Clin Genet. 2026;109:50-59. [PubMed: 40605265]
  • Repo P, Jantti JE, Jarvinen RS, Rantala ES, Tall M, Raivio V, Kivela TT, Turunen JA. Germline loss-of-function variants in MBD4 are rare in Finnish patients with uveal melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2020;33:756-62. [PubMed: 32421892]
  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL, Committee ALQA. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405-24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]
  • Rodrigues M, Mobuchon L, Houy A, Fievet A, Gardrat S, Barnhill RL, Popova T, Servois V, Rampanou A, Mouton A, Dayot S, Raynal V, Galut M, Putterman M, Tick S, Cassoux N, Roman-Roman S, Bidard FC, Lantz O, Mariani P, Piperno-Neumann S, Stern MH. Outlier response to anti-PD1 in uveal melanoma reveals germline MBD4 mutations in hypermutated tumors. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1866. [PMC free article: PMC5951831] [PubMed: 29760383]
  • Saint-Ghislain M, Derrien AC, Geoffrois L, Gastaud L, Lesimple T, Negrier S, Penel N, Kurtz JE, Le Corre Y, Dutriaux C, Gardrat S, Barnhill R, Matet A, Cassoux N, Houy A, Ramtohul T, Servois V, Mariani P, Piperno-Neumann S, Stern MH, Rodrigues M. MBD4 deficiency is predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic uveal melanoma patients. Eur J Cancer. 2022;173:105-12. [PubMed: 35863105]
  • Sampson JR, Jones N. MUTYH-associated polyposis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23:209-18. [PubMed: 19414147]
  • Sanders MA, Chew E, Flensburg C, Zeilemaker A, Miller SE, Al Hinai AS, Bajel A, Luiken B, Rijken M, McLennan T, Hoogenboezem RM, Kavelaars FG, Frohling S, Blewitt ME, Bindels EM, Alexander WS, Lowenberg B, Roberts AW, Valk PJM, Majewski IJ. MBD4 guards against methylation damage and germ line deficiency predisposes to clonal hematopoiesis and early-onset AML. Blood. 2018;132:1526-34. [PMC free article: PMC6172562] [PubMed: 30049810]
  • Sansom OJ, Bishop SM, Bird A, Clarke AR. MBD4 deficiency does not increase mutation or accelerate tumorigenesis in mice lacking MMR. Oncogene. 2004;23:5693-6. [PubMed: 15184874]
  • Sherwood K, Fernandez-Tajes J, Gul G, Thorn S, Ward JC, Wilson JF, Palles C, Bishop DT, Houlston RS, Dunlop MG, Tomlinson IPM. Germline haploinsufficiency of MUTYH causes mutational signature SBS18 in multiple tumour types and specifically raises colorectal cancer risk. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2026;10:275. [PMC free article: PMC13358035] [PubMed: 42092060]
  • Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Chapman M, Evans K, Azevedo L, Hayden M, Heywood S, Millar DS, Phillips AD, Cooper DN. The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD((R))): optimizing its use in a clinical diagnostic or research setting. Hum Genet. 2020;139:1197-207. [PMC free article: PMC7497289] [PubMed: 32596782]
  • Terradas M, Gonzalez-Abuin N, Garcia-Mulero S, Viana-Errasti J, Aiza G, Piulats JM, Brunet J, Capella G, Valle L. MBD4-associated neoplasia syndrome: screening of cases with suggestive phenotypes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023;31:1185-9. [PMC free article: PMC10545785] [PubMed: 37402954]
  • Villy MC, Le Ven A, Le Mentec M, Masliah-Planchon J, Houy A, Bieche I, Vacher S, Vincent-Salomon A, Dubois d'Enghien C, Schwartz M, Piperno-Neumann S, Matet A, Malaise D, Bubien V, Lortholary A, Ait Omar A, Cavaille M, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Cassoux N, Stern MH, Rodrigues M, Golmard L, Colas C. Familial uveal melanoma and other tumors in 25 families with monoallelic germline MBD4 variants. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024;116:580-7. [PubMed: 38060262]
  • Wong E, Yang K, Kuraguchi M, Werling U, Avdievich E, Fan K, Fazzari M, Jin B, Brown AM, Lipkin M, Edelmann W. Mbd4 inactivation increases Cright-arrowT transition mutations and promotes gastrointestinal tumor formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14937-42. [PMC free article: PMC137523] [PubMed: 12417741]
Copyright © 1993-2026, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (https://www.genereviews.org) and copyright (© 1993-2026 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: addmast@wu.edu

Bookshelf ID: NBK624097PMID: 42594245

Views

Related information

  • OMIM
    Related OMIM records
  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed
  • Gene
    Locus Links

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...