NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Research Council (US) Panel on Understanding Divergent Trends in Longevity in High-Income Countries; Crimmins EM, Preston SH, Cohen B, editors. Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.

Cover of Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries

Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries.

Show details

Acknowledgments

In 2008, at the request of the National Institute on Aging, the Committee on Population of the National Research Council (NRC) established a Panel on Understanding Divergent Trends in Longevity in High-Income Countries to examine trends in life expectancy at older ages, to identify possible lessons about modifiable risk factors, and to discern implications for the future trajectory of mortality at advanced ages. This document represents the final report of the panel and is the collective product of all panel members and staff.

This report would not have been possible without the help of numerous people and organizations. We would especially like to thank the report's sponsor, the National Institute on Aging, and in particular to acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Richard Suzman, director of the Division of Behavioral and Social Research and Dr. John Haaga, deputy director of the Division. The support, encouragement, and intellectual energy that they brought to the panel helped us produce a stronger report.

In addressing its charge, the panel was faced with a large and burgeoning theoretical and empirical literature with contributions from many different fields within the social and health sciences. Consequently, as a first step, the panel decided to commission a set of background papers, each one dealing with a topic relevant to the panel's work. These papers have been published by the National Academies Press in a companion volume titled International Differences in Mortality at Older Ages: Dimensions and Sources. These papers served as a valuable resource for the report, and each one was reviewed and debated at length. Members of the panel were heavily involved in the preparation of these papers, and many others contributed as well. The contributors included Dawn Alley, University of Maryland; Mauricio Avendano, Harvard University; Magali Barbieri, Institut National d'Études Démographiques; Carl Boe, University of California, Berkeley; Kaare Christensen, University of Southern Denmark; Michael Davidsen, University of Southern Denmark; Krista Garcia, University of Southern California; Joop Garssen, University of Groningen; Maria Glymour, Harvard University; Jessica Ho, University of Pennsylvania; Knud Juel, University of Copenhagen; Ichiro Kawachi, Harvard University; Jung Ki Kim, University of Southern California; Renske Kok, Erasmus Medical Center; Anton Kunst, University of Amsterdam; Jennifer Lloyd, University of Maryland; France Meslé, Institut National d'Études Démographiques; Laust Mortensen, University of Southern Denmark; Fred Pampel, University of Colorado, Boulder; Roland Rau, University of Rostock; Michelle Shardell, University of Maryland School of Medicine; Andrew Steptoe, University College London; and Anna Wilkman, University College London.

In addition, the panel drew on the expertise of several other experts. As part of this project, the panel organized two public meetings. In December 2008, the panel benefited greatly from the expertise and insights provided by Toni Antonucci, University of Michigan; Steve Blair, University of South Carolina; Virginia Chang, University of Pennsylvania; Jim Harter, The Gallup Organization; Frank Hu, Harvard University; Richard Saltman, Emory University; and Jonathon Skinner, Dartmouth College. In March 2009, the panel benefited from presentations and detailed discussion with Dawn Alley, University of Maryland; Kaare Christensen, University of Southern Denmark; Shiro Horiuchi, Hunter College; Knud Juel, University of Southern Denmark; and Andrew Steptoe, University College London.

Several members of the staff of the National Academies made significant contributions to the report. The panel was established under the auspices of the Committee on Population. Particular thanks are due to Barney Cohen, who was an exceptionally effective study director, as well as to Robert Pool for research and writing assistance, Benjamin Galick for excellent research assistance, Jacqui Sovde for logistical support, Kirsten Sampson Snyder for help guiding the report through review, Rona Briere for skillful editing, and Yvonne Wise for managing the production process.

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC's Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.

We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report: Barbara A. Anderson, Ronald Freedman collegiate professor of sociology and population studies, University of Michigan; Mauricio Avendano, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University; John Bongaarts, Policy Research Division, The Population Council; David Burns, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego; John Cawley, Department of Policy Analysis and Management, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University; Kaare Christiansen, professor of epidemiology, College of Human Ecology, University of Southern Denmark, and senior research scientist, Sanford Institute of Public Policy, Duke University; James S. House, Angus Campbell distinguished university professor survey research, public policy, and sociology, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan; Michael A. Stoto, professor of health systems administration and population health, Georgetown University School of Nursing and Health Studies; and Klaas R. Westerterp, professor of human energetics, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Jane Menken, University of Colorado, Boulder. Appointed by the NRC, she was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring panel and the institution.

Finally, we would like to express our great appreciation to our fellow panel members. This report results from the exceptional efforts of the members of the panel, all of whom had many other responsibilities but who nonetheless generously gave much of their time and their expertise to the project.

Eileen M. Crimmins and Samuel H. Preston, Cochairs

Panel on Understanding Divergent Trends in Longevity in High-Income Countries

Copyright © 2011, National Academy of Sciences.
Bookshelf ID: NBK62365

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (2.4M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...