U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026.

Cover of GeneReviews®

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Show details

MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes

Synonyms: MCM8 Deficiency Syndrome, MCM9 Deficiency Syndrome

, MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, and , MD, PhD.

Author Information and Affiliations

Initial Posting: .

Estimated reading time: 29 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes are characterized by primary gonadal insufficiency (hypergonadotropic hypogonadism) and increased risk of early-onset germ cell tumors in females. Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism can present in females as primary amenorrhea, secondary amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea, underdeveloped uterus, or small/streak ovaries, and in males as impaired spermatogenesis (nonobstructive azoospermia, oligospermia, or Sertoli cell-only syndrome); incomplete or delayed pubertal development is more often seen in females. MCM9-related syndrome is also associated with increased susceptibility to colorectal polyposis (adenomas, hyperplastic or sessile serrated polyps), early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), and early-onset gastric cancer.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome is established in a proband with a clinical phenotype consistent with MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes and biallelic pathogenic variants in MCM8 or MCM9 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Treatment of primary gonadal insufficiency in females includes puberty induction when indicated, estrogen replacement with progestogen in those with a uterus, and management of primary ovarian insufficiency sequelae; in males, management of spermatogenic failure; early referral to reproductive endocrinology / infertility specialist; standard treatments for germ cell tumors; polyp resection during colonoscopy; subtotal colectomy or proctocolectomy when needed; standard treatments for colorectal and gastric cancer.

Surveillance: Annual evaluation by pediatric endocrinologist / reproductive endocrinologist / gynecologist (females) or andrologist/urologist (males) to assess pubertal progression, adequacy of / adherence to hormone therapy, symptoms of sex steroid deficiency, and fertility planning needs; bone density scan every one to three years for those with low bone mineral density, otherwise frequency based on risk factors for low bone mineral density; measure blood pressure and assess weight, body mass index, and smoking status at least annually; lipid panel, fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c as needed; consider annual pelvic ultrasound in females from age ten to 20 years; consider colonoscopy, upper endoscopy, and Helicobacter pylori testing every two years beginning at age 25 years for those with biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants.

Evaluation of relatives at risk: It is appropriate to clarify the genetic status of apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk sibs of an individual with an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome in order to identify as early as possible those who may benefit from treatment of primary ovarian insufficiency, delayed puberty, reduced fertility, and cancer surveillance.

Genetic counseling.

MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. If both parents are known to be heterozygous for an MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variant, each sib of an affected individual has at conception a 25% chance of inheriting biallelic pathogenic variants and being affected, a 50% chance of being heterozygous, and a 25% chance of inheriting neither of the familial pathogenic variants. Heterozygotes may have reduced fertility. To date, it is not clear that heterozygotes are at increased risk of CRC or polyposis. Once the MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member, heterozygote testing for at-risk relatives and prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Diagnosis

No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes have been published.

Suggestive Findings

MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes should be suspected in probands with the following clinical findings and family history.

Clinical findings in MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes

  • Primary gonadal insufficiency (hypergonadotropic hypogonadism)
    • Primary amenorrhea, secondary amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea in females; underdeveloped uterus and small/streak ovaries on pelvic ultrasound in some females
    • Impaired spermatogenesis in males: nonobstructive azoospermia, oligospermia, Sertoli cell-only syndrome
    • Delayed or incomplete puberty (most often reported in females)
  • Germ cell tumors diagnosed before age 20 years in some females

Clinical findings in MCM9-related syndrome

  • History of ≥20 colorectal adenomas, hyperplastic polyps, and/or sessile serrated polyps in an individual of any age, or colorectal polyposis (i.e., 10-20 adenomas) in an individual with any other suggestive findings
  • Colorectal cancer diagnosed before age 50 years
  • Gastric cancer diagnosed before age 50 years

Family history is consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance (e.g., affected sibs and/or parental consanguinity). Absence of a known family history does not preclude the diagnosis.

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes is established in a proband with a clinical phenotype consistent with MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes and biallelic pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variants in MCM8 or MCM9 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Note: (1) Per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics / Association for Molecular Pathology variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of biallelic MCM8 or MCM9 variants of uncertain significance (or of one known MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variant and one MCM8 or MCM9 variant of uncertain significance) does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (concurrent single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, genome sequencing). Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved (see Option 1), whereas comprehensive genomic testing does not (see Option 2).

Option 1

When the phenotypic findings suggest the diagnosis of MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes, molecular genetic testing approaches can include concurrent single-gene testing or use of a multigene panel.

  • Concurrent single-gene testing. Sequence analysis of MCM8 and MCM9 is performed first to detect missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions. Note: Depending on the sequencing method used, single-exon, multiexon, or whole-gene deletions/duplications may not be detected. If only one or no variant is detected by the sequencing method used, the next step is to perform gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis to detect exon and whole-gene deletions or duplications.
  • A multigene panel that includes MCM8, MCM9, and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) may be considered to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.

For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

When the diagnosis of MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes has not been considered because an individual has atypical phenotypic features, comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene is likely involved. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible. To date, the majority of MCM8 and MCM9 pathogenic variants reported (e.g., missense, nonsense) are within the coding region and are likely to be identified on exome sequencing.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes: Molecular Genetic Testing

Gene 1Proportion of MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes Attributed to Pathogenic Variants in GeneProportion of Pathogenic Variants 2 Identified by Method
Sequence analysis 3Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5
MCM8 ~50%100% 4None reported 4, 6
MCM9 ~50%100% 4None reported 4, 6
1.
2.

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in these genes.

3.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

4.
5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Exome and genome sequencing may be able to detect deletions/duplications using breakpoint detection or read depth; however, sensitivity can be lower than gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis.

6.

To date, no large intragenic deletions/duplications have been reported in individuals with MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes.

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes are characterized by primary gonadal insufficiency (hypergonadotropic hypogonadism), incomplete or delayed pubertal development, and increased risk of early-onset germ cell tumors in females [Alvarez-Mora et al 2020, Helderman et al 2025]. MCM9-related syndrome is also associated with increased susceptibility to colorectal polyposis, early-onset colorectal cancer, and gastric cancer. To date, 54 individuals (26 with MCM8-related syndrome and 28 with MCM9-related syndrome) have been reported in the literature [Wood-Trageser et al 2014, AlAsiri et al 2015, Goldberg et al 2015, Tenenbaum-Rakover et al 2015, Dou et al 2016, Fauchereau et al 2016, Bouali et al 2017, Desai et al 2017, Jolly et al 2019, Terradas et al 2019, Yang et al 2019, Alvarez-Mora et al 2020, França et al 2020, Golubicki et al 2020, Guo et al 2020, Heddar et al 2020, Jin et al 2020, Liu et al 2020, Wang et al 2020, Zhang et al 2020, Goldberg et al 2021, Shen et al 2021, Soares de Lima et al 2021, Turkyilmaz et al 2021, Kherraf et al 2022, Tucker et al 2022, Potorac et al 2023]. Individuals reported to date were curated from the literature and summarized by Helderman et al [2025], who only included individuals with biallelic pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (n=15 for MCM8; n=22 for MCM9) as well as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) with a combined annotation-dependent depletion (CADD) score higher than 20 and a gnomAD allele frequency lower than 1% (n=11 for MCM8; n=6 for MCM9). The following description of the phenotypic features associated with these conditions is based on these data. These reports should be interpreted in light of potential ascertainment bias, as most individuals were identified through fertility-focused studies rather than cancer cohorts, likely explaining the high prevalence of primary gonadal insufficiency.

Note: Unless otherwise specified, data and information do not apply to MCM8/MCM9 heterozygotes and individuals with biallelic variants of uncertain significance that do not pass the pathogenicity filtering (CADD score higher than 20 and a gnomAD allele frequency lower than 1%).

Table 2.

MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes: Frequency of Select Features

FeatureProportion of Persons w/Feature 1
MCM8-related syndrome
(n=26)
MCM9-related syndrome
(n=28)
Endocrine manifestations Primary gonadal insufficiencyFemale20/2223/24
Male 23/43/4
Delayed puberty13/266/28
Short stature2/266/28
Germ cell tumors2/261/28
Hypothyroidism3/26NR
Gastrointestinal manifestations Colorectal polyposis2/26 36/28
Colorectal cancerNR6/28
Gastric cancerNR1/28

NR = not reported to date

1.

These numbers should be interpreted in light of potential ascertainment bias, as most individuals were identified through fertility-focused studies rather than cancer cohorts.

2.

Limited male ascertainment

3.

Two individuals with biallelic MCM8 variants included in the analysis by Helderman et al [2025] subsequently developed colorectal polyps after publication.

Primary gonadal insufficiency (hypergonadotropic hypogonadism) is the most consistent phenotypic feature associated with biallelic MCM8 or MCM9 variants. In the largest aggregated cohort, gonadal dysfunction was reported in 88% of individuals with biallelic MCM8 pathogenic variants (23/26) and 93% with biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants (26/28), typically recognized between ages ten and 30 years; these proportions may be inflated by ascertainment through fertility-focused studies [Helderman et al 2025].

Females typically present with primary ovarian insufficiency, which may manifest as absent puberty, delayed or incomplete pubertal development, primary amenorrhea, or secondary amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea after spontaneous menarche. Underdeveloped uterus and small/streak ovaries on pelvic ultrasound are common (particularly prior to estrogen exposure) [Wood-Trageser et al 2014, AlAsiri et al 2015, Bouali et al 2017, Wang et al 2020].

Males most often present with infertility due to impaired spermatogenesis. The spectrum of spermatogenic phenotype includes azoospermia to severe oligospermia/oligoasthenospermia. Semen parameters can fluctuate with age and intercurrent factors (smoking, obesity, stress, exposure to heat). Sertoli cell-only syndrome (complete absence of germ cells on testicular biopsy) has been reported in some males [Tenenbaum-Rakover et al 2015, Kherraf et al 2022, Potorac et al 2023]. Note: The presence of sperm – even with apparently normal parameters on a single evaluation – should not be used to exclude MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes, particularly if the broader clinical picture (e.g., hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, family history consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance) remains suggestive.

Short stature has been reported in individuals with pubertal delay due to an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome. Final adult height is affected by age at treatment initiation and adherence to hormone therapy [Wood-Trageser et al 2014, França et al 2020, Guo et al 2020, Wang et al 2020, Turkyilmaz et al 2021].

Germ cell tumors have only been reported in females, including two individuals with biallelic MCM8 pathogenic variants and one individual with biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants [Alvarez-Mora et al 2020, Helderman et al 2025]. Reported tumors include endodermal sinus tumors, dysgerminomas, and gonadal tumors arising in the setting of marked gonadal dysgenesis. These tumors have occurred in childhood and adolescence (age range: 11 to 15 years) [Helderman et al 2025].

Thyroid dysfunction (including hypothyroidism) has been reported in three individuals with biallelic MCM8 variants. Two individuals had primary hypothyroidism; the third individual had hypothyroidism identified in childhood and had normal thyroid-stimulating hormone and free T4 levels at the time of evaluation but persistent anti-TPO (thyroid peroxidase) antibodies [AlAsiri et al 2015, Heddar et al 2020].

Colorectal polyposis has been observed primarily in individuals with biallelic MCM9 variants [Helderman et al 2025]. Polyps were often numerous, frequently exceeding 20 at the time of endoscopic evaluation, with reported histologic types including adenomas and hyperplastic and serrated polyps [Goldberg et al 2015]; age at identification of polyps ranged between 19 and 68 years [Goldberg et al 2021, Helderman et al 2025]. Two previously reported individuals with biallelic MCM8 pathogenic variants subsequently developed colorectal polyps after publication [Helderman et al 2025; N Helderman, unpublished data]. One individual had a sessile serrated lesion and a tubular adenoma with low-grade dysplasia at age 26 years; her 35-year-old sister developed six tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia and three hyperplastic polyps [N Helderman, unpublished data]. The prevalence of colorectal polyposis may be underestimated, as many individuals with biallelic MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variants were young at the time of diagnosis and/or were not evaluated by colonoscopy.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequently reported malignancy in individuals with biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants, with ages at diagnosis ranging between 30 and 60 years [Goldberg et al 2015, Goldberg et al 2021, Helderman et al 2025]. The prevalence of CRC in individuals with biallelic MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variants may be underestimated due to ascertainment bias in this cohort, as cancer risk is age dependent, most individuals were identified through fertility-focused studies, and many did not have longitudinal follow up.

Gastric cancer has been reported in one individual with biallelic MCM9 variants [Helderman et al 2025]. Consistent with this observation, population-level analyses suggest significant enrichment of biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants among individuals with gastric cancer (odds ratio: 27.03; 95% CI: 2.93-248.5). No enrichment was observed among individuals with biallelic MCM8 pathogenic variants, and no individuals with biallelic MCM8 pathogenic variants with gastric cancer have been reported to date [Helderman et al 2025].

Other findings have been reported in isolated individuals with MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes. Given the limited number of reported individuals, these features should be interpreted with caution but warrant mention. Reported findings include intellectual disability, temporal lobe epilepsy, hearing loss, and unilateral kidney agenesis in one individual [Tenenbaum-Rakover et al 2015]. Another individual presented with facial nevi and a shield-like chest [Wang et al 2020], and pilomatricomas were reported in a further individual [Heddar et al 2020]. At present, it remains unclear whether these features are part of the phenotype or represent coincidental findings.

MCM8/MCM9 heterozygotes. Individuals heterozygous for an MCM8 or MCM9 variant may have reduced fertility. Hypogonadism was observed in 29% (14/49) of individuals with a heterozygous MCM8 pathogenic variant and 22% (10/45) of individuals with a heterozygous MCM9 pathogenic variant [Helderman et al 2025].

CRC and polyposis have been rarely reported in heterozygous individuals (two individuals with CRC and two with polyposis in those with a heterozygous MCM8 pathogenic variant; six individuals with CRC and seven with polyposis in those with a heterozygous MCM9 pathogenic variant, including three individuals having both). CRC onset was at older ages (age >40 years) compared to individuals with biallelic pathogenic variants [Helderman et al 2025]. However, to date there is no clear evidence that heterozygotes are at increased risk of CRC or polyposis.

Phenotype Correlations by Gene

MCM8. To date, CRC has not been reported in individuals with biallelic MCM8 pathogenic variants and only two individuals were found to have colorectal polyposis. In an analysis of the 100,000 Genomes Project, identifying 51 individuals with biallelic pathogenic or predicted deleterious variants in MCM8, no significant enrichment of CRC, polyposis, or other malignancies was observed compared with controls [Helderman et al 2025]. However, prevalence of colorectal phenotypes may be underestimated, as many individuals with biallelic MCM8 pathogenic variants are not routinely evaluated by colonoscopy.

MCM9. To date, individuals with biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants are more likely to have colorectal polyps compared to individuals with biallelic MCM8 pathogenic variants.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

To date, available data are insufficient to establish a genotype-phenotype correlation based on variant type, as both missense and predicted loss-of-function variants have been reported in individuals with overlapping clinical features. However, suspected disease-causing variants were shown to cluster in two key regions: the N-terminal DNA-binding domain, which is crucial for protein-DNA binding (55% of MCM8 variants; 20% of MCM9 variants); and the AAA+ core domain, essential for DNA helicase activity (45% of MCM8 variants; 60% of MCM9 variants) [Helderman et al 2025].

Penetrance

Pedigree studies demonstrate that the penetrance of MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes is nearly complete, as almost all individuals displayed at least one of the reported phenotypes [Helderman et al 2025]. However, two unaffected individuals with biallelic MCM8 pathogenic variants have been reported. Both were phenotypically normal sibs of individuals with MCM8-related syndrome. Importantly, given the absence of extended follow-up data for these individuals, late-onset manifestations cannot be excluded.

Prevalence

The prevalence of MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes is unknown. Population-based data from gnomAD (version 2.1.1) suggest that predicted loss-of-function variants in MCM8 occur at a frequency of approximately 1.4 in 100,000 individuals, with the highest prevalence (5.5 individuals in 100,000 persons) in the African / African American population, and predicted loss-of-function variants in MCM9 occur at a frequency of approximately 2.5 in 100,000 individuals, with the highest prevalence (5.7 individuals in 100,000 persons) in the European Finnish population. Missense variants in MCM8 and MCM9 are found in 462.4 and 1,173.3 individuals in 100,000 persons, respectively. However, it is currently unknown how many of these are (likely) pathogenic. Modeling of biallelic deleterious variants suggests that roughly 0.02% of individuals may have biallelic pathogenic variants in MCM8 or MCM9 [Helderman et al 2025].

Differential Diagnosis

Genetic disorders characterized by primary gonadal insufficiency (hypergonadotropic hypogonadism), colorectal polyposis, cancer, or combinations thereof are of interest in the differential diagnosis (see Table 4).

Chromosomal aneuploidy (e.g., Turner syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome) and FMR1 premutation-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) are the most common genetic causes of hypergonadotropic hypogonadism and should be excluded early in the diagnostic evaluation.

Table 4.

MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes: Genetic Differential Diagnosis

Gene(s)DisorderMOIFeatures Similar to MCM8/MCM9-Related SyndromesFeatures Distinct from MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes
Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (w/o increased risk of colorectal polyposis or cancer)
FMR1
(Premutation allele1
Fragile X-assoc POI (See FMR1 Disorders.)XLHypergonadotropic hypogonadism before age 40 yrs
  • No polyposis
  • No increased cancer risk reported
>23 genes incl:
MEIOB
STAG3
SYCE1
POI (OMIM PS311360)AR
AD
XL
  • Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism
  • POI
SPIDR SPIDR-related ovarian dysgenesis 9 (OMIM 619665)AR
>109 genes incl:
MEIOB
STAG3
SYCE1
Spermatogenic failure (OMIM PS258150)AR
AD
XL
YL
  • Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism
  • Infertility
Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism w/increased risk of colorectal polyposis
HROB
(MCM8IP)
HROB-related POI & possible polyposis 2AR
  • Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism
  • POI
  • Polyposis
Very rare; limited phenotypic data.
Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism w/increased risk of cancer
23 genes incl:
BRCA2
FANCA
FANCC
FANCG
Fanconi anemia AR
XL
AD 3
  • Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism 4
  • POI (≤77%)
  • Testicular failure (≤64%)
  • Cancer predisposition
  • Bone marrow failure (progressive pancytopenia)
  • Chromosomal breakage on DEB/MMC testing
  • Radial ray anomalies, short stature, café au lait macules
  • Increased risk of AML & head/neck squamous cell carcinoma
BLM Bloom syndrome AR
  • Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (male infertility)
  • Increased cancer risk
  • Severe growth restriction
  • Sun-sensitive facial erythema (butterfly rash)
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Increased leukemia & lymphoma risk
WRN Werner syndrome AR
  • Hypogonadism
  • Cancer predisposition
  • Premature aging phenotype (early findings usually observed in 20s)
  • Cataracts & scleroderma-like skin changes
  • Diabetes mellitus & atherosclerosis
  • Increased sarcoma & thyroid cancer risk
Colorectal polyposis syndromes w/increased risk of CRC w/o gonadal dysfunction
15q13-q14 duplication (upstream of GREM1)Hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome (OMIM 601228)AD
  • Adenomatous polyps
  • Increased CRC risk
  • Mixed polyp histology
  • No evidence of gonadal dysfunction
APC Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (See APC-Associated Polyposis Conditions.)AD
  • Increased CRC risk
  • Average of 30 colorectal polyps
  • Extracolonic manifestations (desmoid tumors, fundic gland polyps, CHRPE, dental abnormalities, osteomas)
  • No evidence of gonadal dysfunction
BMPR1A
SMAD4
Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS)ADIncreased CRC risk
EPCAM
MLH1
MSH2
MSH6
PMS2
Lynch syndrome ADIncreased CRC & gastric cancer riskNo evidence of gonadal dysfunction
MLH1
MSH2
MSH6
PMS2
Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) (See Lynch Syndrome.)ARIncreased CRC risk
  • Childhood-onset cancer risk; affected persons often have CRC or cancer of small intestine prior to 2nd decade of life.
  • Café au lait macules
  • No evidence of gonadal dysfunction
MSH3 Familial adenomatous polyposis 4 (OMIM 617100)AR
  • Increased CRC risk
  • 10-100 adenomas
  • Liver cysts reported
  • Possible breast cancer risk
  • No evidence of gonadal dysfunction
MUTYH MUTYH polyposis AR
  • Increased CRC risk
  • Usually 10-100 adenomas
  • Serrated polyps
  • Duodenal adenomas
No evidence of gonadal dysfunction
NTHL1 NTHL1 tumor syndrome AR
  • Increased CRC risk
  • Usually 10-100 adenomas
POLD1 CRC susceptibility 10 (OMIM 612591)AD
  • 10-100 adenomas
  • Increased CRC
  • Increased astrocytoma & endometrial cancer risk
  • No evidence of gonadal dysfunction
POLE CRC susceptibility 12 (OMIM 615083)AD
  • Increased ovarian, gastric, brain, ureteral, & endometrial cancer risk
  • No evidence of gonadal dysfunction
PTEN PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome ADIncreased CRC risk
  • Hamartomatous & mixed GI polyps
  • Macrocephaly, lipomas, multinodular goiter
  • Increased melanoma, thyroid, breast, endometrial, & renal cancer risk
  • No evidence of gonadal dysfunction
STK11 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome AD
  • Increased CRC & gastric cancer risk
  • Increased reproductive organ cancer risk
  • GI hamartomatous polyps (predominantly small bowel)
  • Mucocutaneous pigmentation
  • Increased lung, pancreatic, & breast cancer risk
  • No evidence of gonadal dysfunction

AD = autosomal dominant; AML = acute myelogenous leukemia; AR = autosomal recessive; CHRPE = congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium; CRC = colorectal cancer; DEB = diepoxybutane; GI = gastrointestinal; MMC = mitomycin C; MOI = mode of inheritance; POI = primary ovarian insufficiency; XL = X-linked; YL = Y-linked

1.

Fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency is caused by a premutation-sized repeat (55-200 CGG repeats) in the 5' UTR of FMR1.

2.
3.

Fanconi anemia (FA) is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, an autosomal dominant manner (RAD51-related FA), or an X-linked manner (FANCB-related FA).

4.

Management

No clinical practice guidelines for MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes have been published. In the absence of published guidelines, the following recommendations are based on the authors' personal experience managing individuals with this disorder.

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome, the evaluations summarized in Table 5 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 5.

MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes: Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

System/ConcernEvaluationComment
Primary gonadal insufficiency / Reduced fertility
  • Reproductive endocrinology (&/or pediatric endocrinology) & fertility eval incl pubertal staging & sexual history
  • Symptoms attributable to sex steroid deficiency (e.g., vasomotor or genitourinary symptoms) are not systematically reported but should be assessed clinically.
Females:
  • Assess menstrual history
  • Serum FSH/LH & estradiol
  • Pelvic ultrasound
Males:
  • Serum testosterone
  • Semen analysis in postpubertal males
  • Consider sperm cryopreservation when sperm are present.
  • To establish baseline gonadal function, guide puberty induction / hormone replacement, & counsel re fertility options 1
  • The absence of underdeveloped uterus & small or streak ovaries in females, as well as presence of sperm in males – even w/normal parameters on single eval – does not exclude an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome, particularly in presence of suggestive clinical or familial features.
  • DXA scan to assess bone health
  • Assess vitamin D / calcium intake.
  • Measure blood pressure.
  • Assess weight/BMI.
  • Assess smoking status.
  • Lipid profile
  • Diabetes screening (e.g., HbA1c, random blood sugar, fasting blood sugar)
Recommended in those w/primary gonadal insufficiency 1
Germ cell tumors Pelvic ultrasoundConsider for females beginning at age 10 yrs. 2
Colorectal polyposis/cancer Referral to GI for colonoscopyConsider for persons w/biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants beginning at age 25 yrs. 2
Gastric cancer Referral to GI for upper endoscopyConsider for persons w/biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants beginning at age 30 yrs. 2
Genetic counseling By genetics professionals 3To obtain a pedigree & inform affected persons & their families regarding nature, MOI, & implications of MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes to facilitate medical & personal decision making.

BMI = body mass index; DXA = dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone; GI = gastroenterologist; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; LH = luteinizing hormone; MOI = mode of inheritance

1.

ESHRE, ASRM, CREWHIRL and IMS Guideline Group on POI et al [2025]

2.

Larger cohorts are needed to define recommendations regarding the optimal age to initiate screening.

3.

Clinical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, certified genetic nurse, genetics advanced practice provider (nurse practitioner or physician assistant)

Treatment of Manifestations

Supportive care to improve quality of life, maximize function, and reduce complications is recommended. This ideally involves multidisciplinary care by specialists in relevant fields (see Table 6).

Table 6.

MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes: Treatment of Manifestations

Manifestation/ConcernTreatmentConsiderations/Other
Primary gonadal insufficiency / Reduced fertility Females
  • Puberty induction when indicated
  • Ongoing estrogen replacement w/progestogen if uterus is present.
  • Manage POI sequelae (bone, cardiovascular, genitourinary, psychosocial).
  • In POI, HRT is recommended until usual age of menopause to reduce long-term risks if no contraindications. 1
  • HRT does not prevent pregnancy; contraception is needed if pregnancy is not desired. 1
Males
  • Andrology/urology mgmt of spermatogenic failure
  • Consider sperm cryopreservation if ejaculated sperm are present.
  • Consider surgical sperm retrieval w/ART where appropriate.
For males interested in current or future fertility, avoid testosterone monotherapy (can suppress spermatogenesis). 2
Early referral to reproductive endocrinology /infertility specialist to discuss feasibility of fertility preservation (if any gonadal reserve is present) & assisted reproduction options (e.g., donor gametes, IVF/ICSI).
Germ cell tumors Standard treatments
Colorectal polyposis/cancer
  • Polyp resection during colonoscopy
  • When colonoscopy & polypectomy can no longer manage large size & density of polyps, subtotal colectomy or proctocolectomy should be performed based on polyp features & location.
  • Standard treatments for colorectal cancer.
Gastric cancer Standard treatments

ART = assisted reproductive technology; HRT = hormone replacement therapy; ICSI = intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF = in vitro fertilization; POI = primary ovarian insufficiency

1.
2.

Surveillance

Surveillance should be considered within a shared decision-making framework, taking into account the current available evidence. The evaluations summarized in Table 7 are recommended to monitor existing manifestations, the individual's response to supportive care, and the emergence of new manifestations.

Table 7.

MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes: Recommended Surveillance

System/ConcernEvaluationFrequency
Primary gonadal insufficiency / Fertility Eval by pediatric endocrinologist / reproductive endocrinologist / gynecologist (females) or andrologist/urologist (males) to assess pubertal progression, adequacy of / adherence to hormone therapy, symptoms of sex steroid deficiency, & fertility planning needsAt least annually; more frequently (e.g., every 3-6 mos) during puberty induction or when adjusting hormone therapy
Bone health DXA scanEvery 1-3 yrs for those w/low BMD/osteoporosis; otherwise, frequency based on risk factors for low BMD 1
Cardiometabolic risk
  • Measure blood pressure.
  • Assess weight, BMI, & smoking status.
At least annually
  • Lipid panel
  • Serum (fasting) glucose & HbA1c
As needed based on individual risk
Germ cell tumors Pelvic ultrasoundsConsider annually in females from age 10-20 yrs. 2
Colorectal polyposis/cancer ColonoscopyConsider every 2 yrs beginning at age 25 yrs for persons w/biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants. 2
Gastric cancer
  • Upper endoscopy
  • Helicobacter pylori testing & eradication
Consider in combination w/colonoscopy in persons w/biallelic MCM9 pathogenic variants. 2

BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; DXA = dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c

1.

In those adherent to prescribed systemic hormone therapy with normal initial BMD, a repeat DXA scan within five years may not be necessary.

2.

Larger cohorts and longitudinal studies are needed to define recommendations regarding the appropriate screening intervals.

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

It is appropriate to clarify the genetic status of apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk sibs of an individual with an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome in order to identify as early as possible those who may benefit from treatment of primary ovarian insufficiency (POI), delayed puberty, reduced fertility, and cancer surveillance [Helderman et al 2025].

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Pregnancy Management

Individuals with primary gonadal insufficiency / POI have markedly reduced fertility; however, intermittent ovarian function and spontaneous pregnancy can occur in those with POI. Pregnancy achieved spontaneously or through assisted reproductive technologies should be managed by obstetrics providers based on standard obstetric indications and the individual's comorbidities.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

MCM8/MCM9-related syndromes are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • The parents of an affected individual are presumed to be heterozygous for an MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variant.
  • Molecular genetic testing is recommended for the parents of the proband to confirm that both parents are heterozygous for an MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variant and to allow reliable recurrence risk assessment.
  • If a pathogenic variant is detected in only one parent and parental identity testing has confirmed biological maternity and paternity, it is possible that one of the pathogenic variants identified in the proband occurred as a de novo event in the proband or as a postzygotic de novo event in a mosaic parent [Jónsson et al 2017]. If the proband appears to have homozygous pathogenic variants (i.e., the same two pathogenic variants), additional possibilities to consider include:
  • Heterozygotes may have reduced fertility. To date, it is not clear that heterozygotes are at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) or polyposis (see Clinical Description, MCM8/MCM9 heterozygotes). There are no specific screening recommendations for heterozygous relatives of individuals with an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome, except for participation in general cancer population screening measures.

Sibs of a proband

  • If both parents are known to be heterozygous for an MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variant, each sib of an affected individual has at conception a 25% chance of inheriting biallelic pathogenic variants and being affected, a 50% chance of being heterozygous, and a 25% chance of inheriting neither of the familial pathogenic variants.
  • Heterozygotes may have reduced fertility. To date, it is not clear that heterozygotes are at increased risk for CRC or polyposis (see Clinical Description, MCM8/MCM9 heterozygotes). There are no specific screening recommendations for heterozygous relatives of individuals with an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome, except for participation in general cancer population screening measures.

Offspring of a proband

  • The offspring of an individual with an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome are obligate heterozygotes for a pathogenic variant in MCM8 or MCM9.
  • To date, most reported individuals with an MCM8/MCM9-related syndrome have had severe gonadal dysfunction, and natural conception is expected to be uncommon.

Other family members. Each sib of the proband's parents is at a 50% risk of being heterozygous for an MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variant.

Heterozygote Detection

Heterozygote testing for at-risk relatives requires prior identification of the MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variants in the family.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

See Management, Evaluation of Relatives at Risk for information on evaluating at-risk sibs for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment.

Family planning

  • Females with primary ovarian insufficiency should be counseled that spontaneous conception can occur, and hormone therapy does not provide contraception; effective contraception is needed when pregnancy prevention is desired. Individuals and couples should be offered referral to a reproductive endocrinology / infertility specialist to discuss fertility preservation (when feasible) and assisted reproduction options (e.g., donor gametes, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection).
  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected, are heterozygous, or are at risk of being heterozygous.

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing. While most health care professionals would consider use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A.

MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes: Genes and Databases

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from HGNC; chromosome locus from OMIM; protein from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click here.

Table B.

OMIM Entries for MCM8/MCM9-Related Syndromes (View All in OMIM)

608187MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE COMPLEX COMPONENT 8; MCM8
610098MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE COMPLEX COMPONENT 9; MCM9
612885PREMATURE OVARIAN FAILURE 10; POF10
616185OVARIAN DYSGENESIS 4; ODG4

Molecular Pathogenesis

MCM8 and MCM9 encode DNA helicases MCM8 and MCM9, respectively, which are evolutionarily conserved components of a specialized minichromosome maintenance helicase complex that is critical for maintaining genome stability [Helderman et al 2023]. MCM8 and MCM9 interact to form a hexameric helicase ring complex, and functional studies indicate that the MCM8-MCM9 complex participates in multiple molecular processes, including DNA replication, meiosis, homologous recombination (HR), and mismatch repair (MMR) [Helderman et al 2023].

During DNA replication, MCM8-MCM9 may support the origin recognition complex by recruiting stabilizing proteins and, under certain circumstances, promote replication fork progression, particularly in the context of MCM2 through MCM7 dysfunction. By recruiting BRCA1 and RAD51, the complex can also protect replication forks from degradation when stalled. In meiosis and HR, MCM8-MCM9 contributes to the formation of crossover DNA products and the repair of crosslinks, whereas in MMR, it may facilitate DNA unwinding upon recruitment by hMutS, enabling subsequent hMutL recruitment [Helderman et al 2023].

Biallelic loss-of-function variants in MCM8 or MCM9 may disrupt these processes, with impaired meiosis likely underlying infertility and defective HR and MMR, potentially increasing cancer risk. Interestingly, beyond their shared function within the MCM8-MCM9 complex, each protein may also have independent roles in these processes, and additional functions, either together or separately, cannot be excluded. These differences may contribute to the variable clinical phenotypes observed with biallelic MCM8 or MCM9 pathogenic variants.

Studies of tumors from individuals with biallelic MCM8 or MCM9 variants have not yet identified mutational signatures uniquely associated with MCM8 or MCM9 deficiency. Signatures linked to HR and MMR deficiency were observed in only a minority of tumors, whereas clock-like signatures and signatures of unknown etiology were relatively common [Helderman et al 2023]. Further studies are therefore needed to determine whether tumors arising in individuals with biallelic MCM8 or MCM9 variants are molecularly similar to sporadic tumors, or whether additional as yet unrecognized mutational signatures are associated with MCM8 or MCM9 deficiency.

Interestingly, in the Cancer Genome Atlas pan cancer dataset, both mono- and biallelic somatic pathogenic variants in MCM8 and MCM9 have been identified in tumors with mutational signatures associated with ultraviolet exposure, APOBEC activity, MMR deficiency, and POLE deficiency [Helderman et al 2025]. These findings suggest that secondary impairment of the MCM8-MCM9 complex may arise during sporadic tumorigenesis in a subset of cancers characterized by genomic instability resulting from defects in other DNA repair pathways.

Collectively, these data position MCM8 and MCM9 at the intersection of DNA replication, meiosis, HR, and MMR, linking infertility phenotypes with tumor predisposition.

Mechanism of disease causation. Loss of function

Chapter Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank all individuals and their families for providing consent for the research on which this review is based.

Revision History

  • 16 June 2026 (sw) Review posted live
  • 27 January 2026 (mn) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • AlAsiri S, Basit S, Wood-Trageser MA, Yatsenko SA, Jeffries EP, Surti U, Ketterer DM, Afzal S, Ramzan K, Faiyaz-Ul Haque M, Jiang H, Trakselis MA, Rajkovic A. Exome sequencing reveals MCM8 mutation underlies ovarian failure and chromosomal instability. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2015;125:258-62. [PMC free article: PMC4382257] [PubMed: 25437880]
  • Alvarez-Mora MI, Todeschini AL, Caburet S, Perets LP, Mila M, Younis JS, Shalev S, Veitia RA. An exome-wide exploration of cases of primary ovarian insufficiency uncovers novel sequence variants and candidate genes. Clin Genet. 2020;98:293-8. [PubMed: 32613604]
  • Bouali N, Francou B, Bouligand J, Imanci D, Dimassi S, Tosca L, Zaouali M, Mougou S, Young J, Saad A, Guiochon-Mantel A. New MCM8 mutation associated with premature ovarian insufficiency and chromosomal instability in a highly consanguineous Tunisian family. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:694-702. [PubMed: 28863940]
  • Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Hormone therapy in primary ovarian insufficiency. Committee Opinion No. 698. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e134–41. [PubMed: 28426619]
  • Desai S, Wood-Trageser M, Matic J, Chipkin J, Jiang H, Bachelot A, Dulon J, Sala C, Barbieri C, Cocca M, Toniolo D, Touraine P, Witchel S, Rajkovic A. MCM8 and MCM9 Nucleotide Variants in Women With Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:576-82. [PMC free article: PMC5413161] [PubMed: 27802094]
  • Dou X, Guo T, Li G, Zhou L, Qin Y, Chen Z-J. Minichromosome maintenance complex component 8 mutations cause primary ovarian insufficiency. Fertility and Sterility. 2016;106:1485-9.e2. [PubMed: 27573988]
  • ESHRE, ASRM, CREWHIRL and IMS Guideline Group on POI; Panay N, Anderson RA, Bennie A, Cedars M, Davies M, Ee C, Gravholt CH, Kalantaridou S, Kallen A, Kim KQ, Misrahi M, Mousa A, Nappi RE, Rocca WA, Ruan X, Teede H, Vermeulen N, Vogt E, Vincent AJ. Evidence-based guideline: premature ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril. 2025;123:221-36. [PubMed: 39652037]
  • Fauchereau F, Shalev S, Chervinsky E, Beck-Fruchter R, Legois B, Fellous M, Caburet S, Veitia RA. A non-sense MCM9 mutation in a familial case of primary ovarian insufficiency. Clin Genet. 2016;89:603-7. [PubMed: 26771056]
  • França MM, Funari MFA, Lerario AM, Santos MG, Nishi MY, Domenice S, Moraes DR, Costalonga EF, Maciel GAR, Maciel-Guerra AT, Guerra-Junior G, Mendonca BB. Screening of targeted panel genes in Brazilian patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0240795. [PMC free article: PMC7584253] [PubMed: 33095795]
  • Goldberg Y, Aleme O, Peled-Perets L, Castellvi-Bel S, Nielsen M, Shalev SA. MCM9 is associated with germline predisposition to early-onset cancer-clinical evidence. NPJ Genom Med. 2021;6:78. [PMC free article: PMC8460657] [PubMed: 34556653]
  • Goldberg Y, Halpern N, Hubert A, Adler SN, Cohen S, Plesser-Duvdevani M, Pappo O, Shaag A, Meiner V. Mutated MCM9 is associated with predisposition to hereditary mixed polyposis and colorectal cancer in addition to primary ovarian failure. Cancer Genetics. 2015;208:621-4. [PubMed: 26806154]
  • Golubicki M, Bonjoch L, Acuña-Ochoa JG, Díaz-Gay M, Muñoz J, Cuatrecasas M, Ocaña T, Iseas S, Mendez G, Cisterna D, Schubert SA, Nielsen M, van Wezel T, Goldberg Y, Pikarsky E, Robbio J, Roca E, Castells A, Balaguer F, Antelo M, Castellví-Bel S. Germline biallelic Mcm8 variants are associated with early-onset Lynch-like syndrome. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e140698. [PMC free article: PMC7526538] [PubMed: 32841224]
  • Guo T, Zheng Y, Li G, Zhao S, Ma J, Qin Y. Novel pathogenic mutations in minichromosome maintenance complex component 9 (MCM9) responsible for premature ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:845-52. [PubMed: 32145932]
  • Heddar A, Beckers D, Fouquet B, Roland D, Misrahi M. A novel phenotype combining primary ovarian insufficiency growth retardation and pilomatricomas with MCM8 mutation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105:dgaa155. [PubMed: 32242235]
  • Helderman NC, Terlouw D, Bonjoch L, Golubicki M, Antelo M, Morreau H, van Wezel T, Castellví-Bel S, Goldberg Y, Nielsen M. Molecular functions of MCM8 and MCM9 and their associated pathologies. iScience. 2023;26:106737. [PMC free article: PMC10291252] [PubMed: 37378315]
  • Helderman NC, Yang T, Palles C, Terlouw D, Mei H, Vorderman RHP, Cats D, Díaz-Gay M, Jongmans MCJ, Ramdien A, van de Beek I, Eleveld TF, Green A, Hes FJ, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Van Der Kelen A, Kliesch S, Kuiper RP, Lakeman IMM, Lashley L, Looijenga LHJ, Oud MS, Steingröver J, Tenenbaum-Rakover Y, Tops CM, Tüttelmann F, de Voer RM, Westra D, Wyrwoll MJ, Golubicki M, Antelo M, Bonjoch L, Terradas M, Valle L, Alexandrov LB, Morreau H, van Wezel T, Castellví-Bel S, Goldberg Y, Nielsen M. Clinical syndromes linked to biallelic germline variants in MCM8 and MCM9. HGG Adv. 2025;6:100480. [PMC free article: PMC12361757] [PubMed: 40684266]
  • Helderman NC, Tops CM, Legebeke J, Yang T, Gay MD, Terlouw D, Lashley L, Aretz S, Sommer AK, Terradas M, Valle L, de Voer RM, Alexandrov LB, Morreau H, van Wezel T, Nielsen M. Biallelic Germline Inactivation of HROB Causes Primary Gonadal Insufficiency and is Potentially Associated with Colonic Polyposis Predisposition. Am J Med Genet A. 2026. Epub ahead of print. [PubMed: 41878782]
  • Jin H, Ahn J, Park Y, Sim J, Park HS, Ryu CS, Kim NK, Kwack K. Identification of potential causal variants for premature ovarian failure by whole exome sequencing. BMC Med Genomics. 2020;13:159. [PMC free article: PMC7590468] [PubMed: 33109206]
  • Jolly A, Bayram Y, Turan S, Aycan Z, Tos T, Abali ZY, Hacihamdioglu B, Coban Akdemir ZH, Hijazi H, Bas S, Atay Z, Guran T, Abali S, Bas F, Darendeliler F, Colombo R, Barakat TS, Rinne T, White JJ, Yesil G, Gezdirici A, Gulec EY, Karaca E, Pehlivan D, Jhangiani SN, Muzny DM, Poyrazoglu S, Bereket A, Gibbs RA, Posey JE, Lupski JR. Exome Sequencing of a Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Cohort Reveals Common Molecular Etiologies for a Spectrum of Disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104:3049-67. [PMC free article: PMC6563799] [PubMed: 31042289]
  • Jónsson H, Sulem P, Kehr B, Kristmundsdottir S, Zink F, Hjartarson E, Hardarson MT, Hjorleifsson KE, Eggertsson HP, Gudjonsson SA, Ward LD, Arnadottir GA, Helgason EA, Helgason H, Gylfason A, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, Rafnar T, Frigge M, Stacey SN, Th Magnusson O, Thorsteinsdottir U, Masson G, Kong A, Halldorsson BV, Helgason A, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson K. Parental influence on human germline de novo mutations in 1,548 trios from Iceland. Nature. 2017;549:519-22. [PubMed: 28959963]
  • Kherraf ZE, Cazin C, Bouker A, Fourati Ben Mustapha S, Hennebicq S, Septier A, Coutton C, Raymond L, Nouchy M, Thierry-Mieg N, Zouari R, Arnoult C, Ray PF. Whole-exome sequencing improves the diagnosis and care of men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109:508-17. [PMC free article: PMC8948161] [PubMed: 35172124]
  • Liu K, Wang Y, Zhu Q, Li P, Chen J, Tang Z, Shen Y, Cheng X, Lu LY, Liu Y. Aberrantly expressed HORMAD1 disrupts nuclear localization of MCM8-MCM9 complex and compromises DNA mismatch repair in cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:519. [PMC free article: PMC7347845] [PubMed: 32647118]
  • Petryk A, Kanakatti Shankar R, Giri N, Hollenberg AN, Rutter MM, Nathan B, Lodish M, Alter BP, Stratakis CA, Rose SR. Endocrine disorders in Fanconi anemia: recommendations for screening and treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:803-11. [PMC free article: PMC4333044] [PubMed: 25575015]
  • Potorac I, Laterre M, Malaise O, Nechifor V, Fasquelle C, Colleye O, Detrembleur N, Verdin H, Symoens S, De Baere E, Daly AF, Bours V, Pétrossians P, Pintiaux A. The role of MCM9 in the etiology of Sertoli cell-only syndrome and premature ovarian insufficiency. J Clin Med. 2023;12:990. [PMC free article: PMC9917496] [PubMed: 36769638]
  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405-24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]
  • Schlegel PN, Sigman M, Collura B, De Jonge CJ, Eisenberg ML, Lamb DJ, Mulhall JP, Niederberger C, Sandlow JI, Sokol RZ, Spandorfer SD, Tanrikut C, Treadwell JR, Oristaglio JT, Zini A. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part II. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:62-69. [PubMed: 33309061]
  • Shen J, Qu D, Gao Y, Sun F, Xie J, Sun X, Wang D, Ma X, Cui Y, Liu J, Diao F. Genetic etiologic analysis in 74 Chinese Han women with idiopathic premature ovarian insufficiency by combined molecular genetic testing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:965-78. [PMC free article: PMC8079602] [PubMed: 33538981]
  • Soares de Lima Y, Arnau-Collell C, Díaz-Gay M, Bonjoch L, Franch-Expósito S, Muñoz J, Moreira L, Ocaña T, Cuatrecasas M, Herrera-Pariente C, Carballal S, Moreno L, Díaz de Bustamante A, Castells A, Bujanda L, Cubiella J, Rodríguez-Alcalde D, Balaguer F, Castellví-Bel S. Germline and somatic whole-exome sequencing identifies new candidate genes involved in familial predisposition to serrated polyposis syndrome. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:929. [PMC free article: PMC7927050] [PubMed: 33672345]
  • Tenenbaum-Rakover Y, Weinberg-Shukron A, Renbaum P, Lobel O, Eideh H, Gulsuner S, Dahary D, Abu-Rayyan A, Kanaan M, Levy-Lahad E, Bercovich D, Zangen D. Minichromosome maintenance complex component 8 (MCM8) gene mutations result in primary gonadal failure. J Med Genet. 2015;52:391-9. [PubMed: 25873734]
  • Terradas M, Munoz-Torres PM, Belhadj S, Aiza G, Navarro M, Brunet J, Capellá G, Valle L. Contribution to colonic polyposis of recently proposed predisposing genes and assessment of the prevalence of NTHL1- and MSH3-associated polyposes. Hum Mutat. 2019;40:1910-23. [PubMed: 31243857]
  • Tucker EJ, Bell KM, Robevska G, van den Bergen J, Ayers KL, Listyasari N, Faradz SM, Dulon J, Bakhshalizadeh S, Sreenivasan R, Nouyou B, Carre W, Akloul L, Duros S, Domin-Bernhard M, Belaud-Rotureau MA, Touraine P, Jaillard S, Sinclair AH. Meiotic genes in premature ovarian insufficiency: variants in HROB and REC8 as likely genetic causes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:219-28. [PMC free article: PMC8821714] [PubMed: 34707299]
  • Turkyilmaz A, Cayir A, Yarali O, Kurnaz E, Kartal Baykan E, Arslan Ates E, Demirbilek H. Clinical characteristics and molecular genetic analysis of a cohort with idiopathic congenital hypogonadism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2021;34:771-80. [PubMed: 33819414]
  • Wang F, Guo S, Li P. Two novel mutations in the MCM8 gene shared by two Chinese siblings with primary ovarian insufficiency and short stature. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8:e1396. [PMC free article: PMC7507566] [PubMed: 32652893]
  • Wood-Trageser MA, Gurbuz F, Yatsenko SA, Jeffries EP, Kotan LD, Surti U, Ketterer DM, Matic J, Chipkin J, Jiang H, Trakselis MA, Topaloglu AK, Rajkovic A. MCM9 mutations are associated with ovarian failure, short stature, and chromosomal instability. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;95:754-62. [PMC free article: PMC4259971] [PubMed: 25480036]
  • Yang X, Touraine P, Desai S, Humphreys G, Jiang H, Yatsenko A, Rajkovic A. Gene variants identified by whole-exome sequencing in 33 French women with premature ovarian insufficiency. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:39-45. [PMC free article: PMC6338598] [PubMed: 30406445]
  • Zhang YX, He WB, Xiao WJ, Meng LL, Tan C, Du J, Lu GX, Lin G, Tan YQ. Novel loss-of-function mutation in MCM8 causes premature ovarian insufficiency. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8:e1165. [PMC free article: PMC7196458] [PubMed: 32048466]
Copyright © 1993-2026, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved. Test.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (https://www.genereviews.org) and copyright (© 1993-2026 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: addmast@wu.edu

Bookshelf ID: NBK623157PMID: 42302138

Views

Tests in GTR by Gene

Related information

  • OMIM
    Related OMIM records
  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed
  • Gene
    Locus Links

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...