U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026.

Cover of GeneReviews®

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Show details

Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome

, MD, , MS, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, and , PhD.

Author Information and Affiliations

Initial Posting: .

Estimated reading time: 30 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (SKS) is characterized by varying degrees of overgrowth, developmental delay / intellectual disability, neurodevelopmental issues (autistic features, ADHD), and congenital anomalies. Developmental delay typically involves all aspects of development (gross motor, fine motor, speech/language). Virtually all individuals have speech delay, although speech abilities over time range from vocalizations to some verbal communication, with about 50% of individuals reportedly able to use verbal communication. Intellectual disability is frequently identified in affected individuals and typically ranges from moderate to severe. Regression in development has been reported in a minority of affected individuals. Other features of SKS include congenital hypotonia, epilepsy, sleep-wake disturbances (including insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea), macrocephaly, hyperphagia, eye anomalies, skeletal anomalies, cardiac findings (including stable aortic root dilatation), and genitourinary anomalies, most commonly in males (undescended testes and hypospadias).

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of SKS is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous constitutional or early postzygotic activating pathogenic variant in MTOR identified by molecular genetic testing. Because a significant subset (20%-25%) of individuals have a pathogenic variant that is postzygotic (and thus mosaic), more than one tissue may need to be tested, such as sequence analysis of DNA derived from a freshly obtained dermal biopsy.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Feeding therapy with consideration of gastrostomy tube placement for persistent feeding issues; healthy lifestyle and referral to nutritionist to address obesity; standard treatment for epilepsy, developmental delay / intellectual disability, scoliosis and/or pes planus, mobility issues, vision issues, aortic dilatation, valvar and cardiac septal defects, sleep abnormalities, undescended testes / hypospadias, hypoglycemia, and hearing loss.

Surveillance: At each visit, measure growth parameters, evaluate nutritional status, monitor eating habits, assess for signs of hyperphagia, assess for new neurologic manifestations such as seizures and developmental regression, monitor developmental progress and educational needs, assess mobility and self-help skills, monitor for signs/symptoms of sleep disturbance, and assess for scoliosis clinically (until skeletal maturity). At least annually or as clinically indicated, obtain ophthalmology evaluation. As clinically indicated, monitor for hypoglycemia (typically in infancy), obtain behavioral assessment for anxiety, ADHD, autism, aggression, and self-injury, and perform audiology evaluation.

Therapies under investigation: Off-label sirolimus (rapamycin) has been used in seven individuals with SKS at low-to-moderate doses with parent-reported improvements in some behaviors, including verbal skills, attention span, decreased self-aggression, and improved hyperphagia. Before using mTOR inhibitors (e.g., rapamycin), it is advisable or necessary to assess the biochemical and functional impacts of the pathogenic variant in the affected individual to optimize dosing and timing. Of note, first-generation, second-generation, and third-generation inhibitors may have distinct mechanisms and off-target effects. Any off-label use of drugs should be done at the discretion of the treating physician in conjunction with the affected individual and/or caregiver and is not endorsed by GeneReviews or the authors of this chapter.

Genetic counseling.

SKS is an autosomal dominant disorder typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant. Approximately 86% of individuals diagnosed with SKS have the disorder as the result of a de novo constitutional or early postzygotic pathogenic variant in MTOR. Some individuals have the disorder as the result of an MTOR pathogenic variant inherited from an unaffected parent with gonadal mosaicism (~11%) or, rarely, an affected parent (~3%). Sib recurrence has been reported in several families with presumed parental gonadal mosaicism. Once the MTOR pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Diagnosis

No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (SKS) have been published.

Suggestive Findings

SKS should be considered in probands with the following clinical and brain MRI findings and family history.

Clinical findings

  • Macrocephaly (head circumference that measures 2 standard deviations [SD] or more above the mean for age and sex)
  • Large for gestational age (weight and/or length that is more than 2 SD above the mean for age and sex)
  • Developmental delays or intellectual disability, typically in the moderate-to-severe range
  • Neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder and/or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
  • Epilepsy, including generalized or focal epilepsy and/or status epilepticus
  • Sleep-wake abnormalities
  • Hyperphagia
  • Hypotonia
  • Ophthalmologic involvement, including strabismus, refractory abnormalities, and optic atrophy
  • Distinctive facial features (See Figure 1 and Clinical Description, Facial features.)
Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Individuals with Smith-Kingsmore syndrome

Brain MRI findings

  • Cortical malformations, including polymicrogyria, focal cortical dysplasia, and hemimegalencephaly
  • Other brain abnormalities, such as atypical corpus callosum and ventriculomegaly

Family history. Because SKS is typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant, most probands represent a simplex case (i.e., a single occurrence in a family). Occasionally, the family history may be consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance (e.g., affected males and females in multiple generations) or gonadal mosaicism (e.g. affected males and females in the same generation with unaffected parents) [Liu et al 2024].

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of SKS is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous constitutional or early postzygotic activating pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in MTOR identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1). Because a significant subset (20%-25%) of individuals have a pathogenic variant that is postzygotic (and thus mosaic), more than one tissue may need to be tested, such as sequence analysis of DNA derived from a freshly obtained dermal biopsy (see Molecular Genetics).

Note: (1) Per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) / Association for Molecular Pathology variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of a heterozygous MTOR variant of uncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, genome sequencing). Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved (see Option 1), whereas comprehensive genomic testing does not (see Option 2).

Option 1

When the phenotypic and brain MRI findings suggest the diagnosis of SKS, molecular genetic testing approaches can include use of a multigene panel.

A multigene panel that includes MTOR and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.

For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by macrocephaly, developmental delay, and epilepsy, comprehensive genomic testing may be considered.

Comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene(s) are likely involved. Exome sequencing is often used and yields results similar to an intellectual disability multigene panel, with the additional advantage that exome sequencing includes genes recently identified as causing intellectual disability, whereas some multigene panels may not. To date, all MTOR pathogenic variants reported (e.g., missense) are activating pathogenic variants within the coding region (see Molecular Genetics) and are likely to be identified on exome sequencing. Genome sequencing is also possible. ACMG and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend exome/genome sequencing as first- or second-tier diagnostic testing for children with developmental delay, intellectual disability, and/or multiple congenital anomalies [Manickam et al 2021, Rodan et al 2025].

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome: Molecular Genetic Testing

Gene 1MethodProportion of Pathogenic Variants 2 Identified by Method
MTOR Sequence analysis 3~100% 4
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5None reported to date 4, 6
1.
2.

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in this gene.

3.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

4.

Data derived from the subscription-based professional view of Human Gene Mutation Database [Stenson et al 2020] and from Liu et al [2024]. The MTOR pathogenic variant c.5395G>A (p.Glu1799Lys) has been reported in almost 50% of individuals with SKS (see Genotype-Phenotype Correlations and Molecular Genetics).

5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Exome and genome sequencing may be able to detect deletions/duplications using breakpoint detection or read depth; however, sensitivity can be lower than gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis.

6.

To date, no large intragenic deletions/duplications have been identified in individuals with SKS.

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

To date, at least 100 individuals have been identified with a pathogenic variant in MTOR leading to SKS [Smith et al 2013, Baynam et al 2015, Lim et al 2015, Mroske et al 2015, Mirzaa et al 2016, Møller et al 2016, Moosa et al 2017, Gordo et al 2018, Handoko et al 2019, Lee et al 2019, Rodríguez-García et al 2019, Besterman et al 2021, Carli et al 2021, Carmignac et al 2021, Poole et al 2021, Resta et al 2021, Liu et al 2024]. The following description of the phenotypic features associated with this condition is based on these reports.

Table 2.

Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome: Frequency of Select Features

Feature% of Persons w/FeatureComment
Developmental delay / intellectual disability89/94 (95%)
  • Most commonly in the moderate-to-severe range
  • Developmental regression observed in 18%
Macrocephaly88/98 (90%)
Distinctive facial features57/72 (79%)Recognizable for persons w/pathogenic variants in FAT & kinase domains (See Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.)
Brain malformations65/82 (79%)Incl megalencephaly, agenesis or hypogenesis of corpus callosum, cortical malformations, & generalized white matter loss w/accompanying ventriculomegaly (ex vacuo)
Neuromuscular concerns48/61 (79%)Incl hypotonia
Sleep-wake abnormalities27/35 (77%)Incl insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, circadian rhythm sleep-wake phase disorder
Ophthalmologic problems34/48 (71%)Incl strabismus, refractory abnormalities, & optic atrophy
Skeletal abnormalities29/45 (64%)Most commonly scoliosis
Epilepsy48/79 (61%)Generalized, focal, or status epilepticus
Generalized overgrowth28/59 (47%)Mostly in early childhood; not a prominent feature in adulthood
Autism36/79 (46%)
Hyperphagia11/27 (41%)Early onset
Cardiovascular problems18/45 (40%)Incl valvar abnormalities, septal defects, & aortic root dilatation
ADHD/hyperactivity11/49 (22%)

ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Developmental delays and intellectual disability. The majority of affected individuals exhibit developmental delays, which are often the first noticeable feature, typically presenting before the age of two years.

  • Developmental delay involving all aspects of development (gross motor, fine motor, speech/language) is commonly observed, but some individuals can present with more significant and specific language delays.
    • Most individuals are able to walk independently at an average age of 2.5 years (typically ranging from about age 18 months to up to age 5 years).
    • About one third of affected individuals do not achieve independent ambulation.
    • Virtually all individuals have speech delay.
    • Speech abilities over time range from vocalizations to some verbal communication, with about 50% of individuals reportedly able to use verbal communication.
  • Intellectual disability is frequently identified in affected individuals and typically ranges from moderate to severe.
  • There is a significant lack of longitudinal follow-up data, limiting understanding of the long-term developmental trajectory and outcomes in affected individuals.
  • Regression in overall development has been reported in about 18% of affected individuals.
    • Most of the individuals with regression also had autism or autistic behaviors.
    • A few individuals with developmental regression also had epilepsy.

Neuromuscular concerns are observed in 79% of individuals.

  • Congenital hypotonia is present in 46% of individuals. It is most often mild to moderate and is not progressive.
  • Hypertonia is less common but has also been noted.

Epilepsy. About 60% of affected individuals have epilepsy, with seizures first presenting in childhood for many.

  • Both generalized and focal seizures have been described.
  • While there is limited data available, status epilepticus in general tends to be more common in individuals with brain malformations.
  • EEG may demonstrate a combination of midline rhythmic waveforms and asynchronous spike-and-wave discharges with anterior fast activity in sleep and wake, which is a possible hallmark feature, although further data is needed to improve our understanding [Simonelli et al 2024].

Neurobehavioral/psychiatric manifestations

  • Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or autistic behaviors are reported in 46% of affected individuals. ASD is common in individuals with regression, but not all those with ASD have regression.
  • Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or hyperactivity/impulsivity is reported in 22% of affected individuals. More than half of individuals with ADHD have a co-occurring ASD diagnosis.
  • Self-injurious behaviors or aggression toward others are reported in 27% of affected individuals.
  • Anxiety is reported in about 15% of affected individuals and may be present starting in early childhood. However, there is a significant lack of natural history data in adolescents and adults, limiting understanding of the likelihood of anxiety presenting across the life span.

Sleep disturbances. About 75% of affected individuals have sleep-wake disturbances, including insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea.

  • Sleep onset and sleep maintenance difficulties have both been reported, although sleep maintenance difficulties are more common.
  • Circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders have also been described.

Facial features. Distinctive facial features have been observed but may not be specific enough to this condition to be able to make a clinical diagnosis without confirmatory molecular genetic testing (see Figure 1). The features are more evident in early childhood but not present in all individuals. In older individuals some features can be more subtle and difficult to diagnose. In general, the distinctive facial features include:

  • Macrocephaly
  • Broad forehead
  • Widely spaced eyes
  • Downslanted palpebral fissures
  • Long philtrum
  • Thin vermilion of the upper lip
  • Wide mouth
  • Open-mouth posture

The above describable facial features are more consistently present in individuals with pathogenic variants in the kinase and FAT domains (see Genotype-Phenotype Correlations).

Growth. Onset of generalized overgrowth has been noted at birth and early postnatally in 47% of affected individuals.

  • Macrocephaly (head circumference >2 standard deviations [SD] above the mean for age and sex) is a hallmark feature, present in 90% of affected individuals.
  • Limited prenatal growth data is available, but in at least one report fetal macrocephaly was noted during pregnancy [Everett et al 2022].
  • Height may normalize in adulthood, but final adult height data is scarce.

Gastrointestinal/feeding issues

  • There has been at least one individual with a PEG tube placement [Szczałuba et al 2021] and at least two individuals with dysphagia [Besterman et al 2021].
  • Hyperphagia has been described in 41% of affected individuals. This typically presents in early childhood. There is one affected adult reported with obesity [Bonnet et al 2024].
  • Constipation has also been observed.
  • One adult with SKS has been reported with intestinal polyps, but ongoing natural history studies are needed to help clarify if this is related to the diagnosis of SKS [Moosa et al 2017].

Ophthalmologic involvement is noted in 71% of affected individuals and includes cortical visual impairment, strabismus, refractory abnormalities, optic atrophy, enlarged retinal vessels, iris coloboma, and drusen pigmentation.

Skeletal features. Abnormal gait, pes planus, and scoliosis have been described.

Cardiovascular abnormalities. About 40% of individuals who have undergone cardiac imaging have abnormalities. Described findings include mitral valve dysplasia and stenosis, septal defects, bicuspid aortic valve, and stable aortic root dilatation.

Neuroimaging. About 80% of individuals who have undergone neuroimaging have abnormalities.

  • A range of cortical malformations have been reported, including polymicrogyria, focal cortical dysplasia, and hemimegalencephaly.
  • Other abnormalities include ventriculomegaly, abnormal corpus callosum, white matter abnormalities, and brain atrophy.

Other associated features

  • Hearing impairment. Sensorineural hearing loss has been reported in a few affected individuals but is not common.
  • Genitourinary abnormalities. Undescended testes and hypospadias have been described in males.
  • Ectodermal findings
    • Hyperpigmented nevi are a common finding in individuals with a mosaic pathogenic variant.
    • Hair can be curly/wavy in some individuals.
    • Dry skin and pigmentary mosaicism have also been described.
  • Endocrinologic. Infantile hypoglycemia has been observed in a few individuals [Poole et al 2021, Szczałuba et al 2021].

Prognosis. A few individuals have been reported with early death, including one individual who succumbed due to hypoxic respiratory failure in the setting of viral pneumonia [Smith et al 2013; C Prada, D Krueger, & C Raski, personal observations]. However, survival to adulthood is common. One reported individual with a pathogenic variant in the FIT domain of MTOR is alive at age 70 years [Møller et al 2016], demonstrating that survival into late adulthood is possible. Since many adults with disabilities have not undergone advanced genetic testing, it is likely that adults with this condition are underrecognized and underreported. Additional studies are needed to better understand the life span and health span in individuals with Smith-Kingsmore syndrome.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Protein domain-related correlations

  • Kinase domain. The following are more common in individuals who have pathogenic variants in the kinase domain:
    • Hearing problems
    • Distinctive facial features
  • FAT domain. The following are more common in individuals who have pathogenic variants in the FAT domain:
    • Autistic behavior
    • Distinctive facial features

Pathogenic variant-related correlations

  • c.5395G>A (p.Glu1799Lys) is the most prevalent pathogenic variant, reported in close to 50% of individuals with SKS. Affected individuals with this pathogenic variant have more uniform neurodevelopmental outcomes, including developmental delay involving all aspects of development (gross motor, fine motor, and speech/language), intellectual disability, and autistic behaviors (see Molecular Genetics).

Prevalence

The prevalence of this condition is unknown.

Differential Diagnosis

Genetic disorders characterized by macrocephaly, global developmental delays, hypotonia, seizures, sleep disturbance, and brain abnormalities are of interest in the differential diagnosis of Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (SKS) (see Table 3).

Table 3.

Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome: Differential Diagnosis

Gene(s) / Genetic MechanismDisorderMOIFeatures of Disorder
Overlapping w/SKSDistinguishing from SKS
CHD3 Snijerds Blok-Campeau syndrome (OMIM 618205)AD
  • Macrocephaly
  • DD
  • Hypotonia
  • Midface hypoplasia, dental abnormalities
  • Cutaneous findings
  • Absence of overgrowth
NSD1 Sotos syndrome AD
  • Macrocephaly
  • Autistic features
  • DD
  • Hypotonia
  • Cardiovascular anomalies
  • Characteristic features incl dolichocephaly & prognathism
  • Advanced bone age
PIK3CA PIK3CA -related overgrowth spectrum Not known to be inherited (most pathogenic variants are somatic mosaic)
  • Macrocephaly
  • Seizures
  • DD
  • Skin findings incl epidermal nevi & hyperpigmented macules
  • Vascular malformations
  • Lymphatic malformations
  • Severe focal overgrowth
PTCH1
SUFU
Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (Gorlin syndrome)ADMacrocephaly
  • Skeletal abnormalities, ectopic calcifications (falx)
  • Basal cell carcinomas, jaw keratocysts, risk for medulloblastoma
  • Epidermal cysts
PTEN PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome AD
  • Macrocephaly
  • Overgrowth
  • DD
  • Skin findings incl lipomas, trichilemmomas, oral papillomas, & penile freckling
  • Intestinal hamartomas
  • Cancer risk & family history of malignant tumors of thyroid, breast, kidney, & endometrium
TSC1
TSC2
Tuberous sclerosis complex AD
  • Macrocephaly
  • Seizures
  • ASD
  • DD
  • Skin findings incl shagreen patches, facial angiofibromas, & hypomelanotic macules
  • ↑ risk for tumors such as hamartomatous brain lesions, renal tumors & cysts, lung cysts (adults), & cardiac rhabdomyomas
Abnormal DNA methylation in PWCR at 15q11.2-q13 Prader-Willi syndrome Recurrence risk depends on genetic mechanism 1
  • Hyperphagia, obesity
  • Hypotonia
  • DD
  • Small for gestational age, poor weight gain in early infancy
  • Characteristic facial features incl narrow bifrontal diameter, almond-shaped palpebral fissures, & narrow nasal bridge
  • Absence of macrocephaly

AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; DD = developmental delay; MOI = mode of inheritance; PWCR = Prader-Willi critical region; SKS = Smith-Kingsmore syndrome; XL = X-linked

1.

Individuals with PWS typically represent simplex cases (i.e., a single affected family member) and have the disorder as the result of a de novo genetic alteration associated with a very low recurrence. Less commonly, an individual with PWS has the disorder as the result of a genetic alteration associated with an imprinting pattern of autosomal dominant inheritance or variable recurrence risk.

Other. SKS should be distinguished from acquired conditions with developmental delays, macrocephaly, seizures, and brain abnormalities, such as uncontrolled gestational diabetes.

Management

No clinical practice guidelines for Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (SKS) have been published. In the absence of published guidelines, the following recommendations are based on the authors' personal experience managing individuals with this disorder.

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with SKS, the evaluations summarized in Table 4 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 4.

Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome: Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

System/ConcernEvaluationComment
Constitutional Measurement of growth parameters incl head circumference
  • To assess for macrocephaly & generalized overgrowth
  • To assess for obesity in those who have hyperphagia
Neurologic Neurologic eval
  • Brain MRI should be considered to identify any brain malformations.
  • Baseline EEG given high frequency of seizures
Development Developmental assessment
  • To incl motor, adaptive, cognitive, feeding, & speech-language eval
  • Eval for early intervention / special education
Neurobehavioral/
Psychiatric
Neuropsychiatric eval
  • Formal autism eval in those w/findings suggestive of ASD
  • For persons age >12 mos: screening for ADHD, anxiety, aggression, & self-injury
Musculoskeletal
  • Clinical assessment for scoliosis &/or pes planus
  • Consider radiographs in those who have clinical scoliosis.
  • Orthopedics / physical medicine & rehab / PT & OT eval
To incl assessment of:
  • Gross motor & fine motor skills
  • Mobility, ADL, & need for adaptive devices
  • Need for PT (to improve gross motor skills) &/or OT (to improve fine motor skills)
Gastrointestinal/
Feeding
Gastroenterology / nutrition / feeding team eval
  • To incl eval of aspiration risk & nutritional status
  • Consider eval for gastrostomy tube placement in persons w/dysphagia &/or aspiration risk.
  • Assessment for hyperphagia
Eyes Ophthalmologic evalTo assess for strabismus, cortical visual impairment, optic nerve atrophy, & other findings that impact vision
Hearing Audiologic evalAssess for hearing loss.
Cardiovascular
  • Assess for cardiac manifestations, such as heart murmur or poor growth.
  • Baseline echocardiogram given high frequency of septal defects, valvar abnormalities, & aortic dilatation
Referral to cardiologist as needed
Respiratory
  • Assess for signs/symptoms of sleep disturbance.
  • Consider polysomnography to evaluate for sleep abnormalities, incl circadian disorders, & to assess for sleep apnea.
  • Sleep diary for circadian disruption
  • Consider referral to sleep specialist.
Genitourinary Physical exam for undescended testes &/or hypospadias in malesConsider referral to urologist.
Endocrinology Assess for hypoglycemia in infancy.Consider referral to endocrinologist if severe &/or prolonged.
Genetic counseling By genetics professionals 1To obtain a pedigree & inform affected persons & their families re nature, MOI, & implications of SKS to facilitate medical & personal decision making
Family support
& resources
By clinicians, wider care team, & family support organizationsAssessment of family & social structure to determine need for:

ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ADL = activities of daily living; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; MOI = mode of inheritance; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy, SKS = Smith-Kingsmore syndrome

1.

Clinical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, certified genetic nurse, genetics advanced practice provider (nurse practitioner or physician assistant)

Treatment of Manifestations

There is no cure for SKS.

Targeted Therapy

In GeneReviews, a targeted therapy is one that addresses the specific underlying mechanism of disease causation (regardless of whether the therapy is significantly efficacious for one or more manifestation of the genetic condition); would otherwise not be considered without knowledge of the underlying genetic cause of the condition; or could lead to a cure. —ED

See Therapies Under Investigation for discussion of off-label use of sirolimus and other mTOR inhibitors.

Note: Any off-label use of drugs should be done at the discretion of the treating physician in conjunction with the affected individual and/or caregiver and is not endorsed by GeneReviews or the authors of this chapter.

Supportive Care

Supportive care to improve quality of life, maximize function, and reduce complications is recommended. This ideally involves multidisciplinary care by specialists in relevant fields (see Table 5).

Table 5.

Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome: Treatment of Manifestations

Manifestation/ConcernTreatmentConsiderations/Other
Feeding difficulties
  • Feeding therapy
  • Gastrostomy tube placement may be required for persistent feeding issues.
Low threshold for clinical feeding eval &/or radiographic swallowing study when showing clinical signs or symptoms of dysphagia due to neurologic complications
Obesity
  • Healthy lifestyle, incl balanced diet & exercise
  • Standard treatment per nutritionist
  • Consider referral to nutritionist.
  • At least 1 persons experienced success w/use of semaglutide. 1
Epilepsy Standardized treatment w/ASM by experienced neurologist
  • Many ASMs may be effective; none has been demonstrated effective specifically for this disorder.
  • Education of parents/caregivers 3
Developmental delay / Intellectual disability / Neurobehavioral issues See Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues.Standard mgmt of neurobehavioral issues
Scoliosis &/or pes planus Standard treatment per orthopedist
Mobility issues Orthopedics / physical medicine & rehab / PT & OT incl stretching to help avoid contractures & fallsConsider need for positioning & mobility devices & disability parking placard.
Vision Standard treatment per ophthalmologist
Low vision servicesPer treating clinicians
Hearing Hearing aids may be helpful per otolaryngologist.Community hearing services through early intervention or school district
Aortic dilatation Standard treatment per cardiologistMonitoring by cardiologist
Valvar & septal defects
Sleep abnormalities Standard treatment per sleep medicine specialist or pulmonologistBehavioral therapy may be beneficial, although pharmacotherapy may also be considered.
Undescended testes / Hypospadias Standard treatment per urologist
Hypoglycemia Standard treatment per endocrinologistTypically resolves after infancy
Transition to adult care Develop realistic plans for adult life (see American Epilepsy Society Transitions from Pediatric Epilepsy to Adult Epilepsy Care).Starting by age ~10 yrs
Family/Community
  • Ensure appropriate social work involvement to connect families w/local resources, respite, & support.
  • Coordinate care to manage multiple subspecialty appointments, equipment, medications, & supplies.
  • Ongoing assessment of need for palliative care involvement &/or home nursing
  • Consider involvement in adaptive sports or Special Olympics.

ASM = anti-seizure medication; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy

1.
2.

Education of parents/caregivers regarding common seizure presentations is appropriate. For information on non-medical interventions and coping strategies for children diagnosed with epilepsy, see Epilepsy Foundation Toolbox.

Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues

The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.

Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy as well as infant mental health services, special educators, and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to target individual therapy needs.

Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, social, or cognitive delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; for children too medically unstable to attend, home-based services are provided.

All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies (US) and to support parents in maximizing quality of life. Some issues to consider:

  • IEP services:
    • An IEP provides specially designed instruction and related services to children who qualify.
    • IEP services will be reviewed annually to determine whether any changes are needed.
    • Special education law requires that children participating in an IEP be in the least restrictive environment feasible at school and included in general education as much as possible, when and where appropriate.
    • Vision and hearing consultants should be a part of the child's IEP team to support access to academic material.
    • PT, OT, and speech services will be provided in the IEP to the extent that the need affects the child's access to academic material. Beyond that, private supportive therapies based on the affected individual's needs may be considered. Specific recommendations regarding type of therapy can be made by a developmental pediatrician.
    • As a child enters the teen years, a transition plan should be discussed and incorporated in the IEP. For those receiving IEP services, the public school district is required to provide services until age 21.
  • A 504 plan (Section 504: a US federal statute that prohibits discrimination based on disability) can be considered for those who require accommodations or modifications such as front-of-class seating, assistive technology devices, classroom scribes, extra time between classes, modified assignments, and enlarged text.
  • Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) enrollment is recommended. DDA is a US public agency that provides services and support to qualified individuals. Eligibility differs by state but is typically determined by diagnosis and/or associated cognitive/adaptive disabilities.
  • Families with limited income and resources may also qualify for supplemental security income (SSI) for their child with a disability.

Motor Dysfunction

Gross motor dysfunction

  • Physical therapy is recommended to maximize mobility and to reduce the risk for later-onset orthopedic complications (e.g., contractures, scoliosis, hip dislocation).
  • Consider use of durable medical equipment and positioning devices as needed (e.g., wheelchairs, walkers, bath chairs, orthotics, adaptive strollers).
  • For muscle tone abnormalities including hypertonia or dystonia, consider involving appropriate specialists to aid in management of baclofen, tizanidine, Botox®, anti-parkinsonian medications, or orthopedic procedures.

Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.

Oral motor dysfunction should be assessed at each visit and clinical feeding evaluations and/or radiographic swallowing studies should be obtained for choking/gagging during feeds, poor weight gain, frequent respiratory illnesses, or feeding refusal that is not otherwise explained. Assuming that the child is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy (typically from an occupational or speech therapist) is recommended to help improve coordination or sensory-related feeding issues. Feeds can be thickened or chilled for safety. When feeding dysfunction is severe, an NG-tube or G-tube may be necessary.

Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g., augmentative and alternative communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties. An AAC evaluation can be completed by a speech-language pathologist who has expertise in the area. The evaluation will consider cognitive abilities and sensory impairments to determine the most appropriate form of communication. AAC devices can range from low-tech, such as picture exchange communication, to high-tech, such as voice-generating devices. Contrary to popular belief, AAC devices do not hinder verbal development of speech, but rather support optimal speech and language development.

Neurobehavioral/Psychiatric Concerns

Children may qualify for and benefit from interventions used in treatment of autism spectrum disorder, including applied behavior analysis (ABA). ABA therapy is targeted to the individual child's behavioral, social, and adaptive strengths and weaknesses and typically performed one on one with a board-certified behavior analyst.

Consultation with a developmental pediatrician may be helpful in guiding parents through appropriate behavior management strategies or providing prescription medications, such as medication used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, when necessary.

Concerns about serious aggressive or destructive behavior can be addressed by a pediatric psychiatrist.

Surveillance

To monitor existing manifestations, the individual's response to supportive care, and the emergence of new manifestations, the evaluations summarized in Table 6 are recommended.

Table 6.

Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome: Recommended Surveillance

System/ConcernEvaluationFrequency
Feeding/Growth
  • Measurement of growth parameters
  • Eval of nutritional status & safety of oral intake
  • Monitoring of eating habits, behaviors, & signs of hyperphagia
At each visit
Neurologic
  • Monitor those w/seizures as clinically indicated.
  • Assess for new manifestations such as seizures & developmental regression.
Development Monitor developmental progress & educational needs.
Neurobehavioral/
Psychiatric
Assessment for anxiety, ADHD, ASD, aggression, & self-injuryAs clinically indicated
Musculoskeletal Assessment of mobility & self-help skillsAt each visit
Clinical assessment for scoliosisAt each visit until skeletal maturity
Eyes Ophthalmology evalAt least annually, or as clinically indicated or recommended by ophthalmologist
Hearing Audiology evalAs clinically indicated
Respiratory Monitor for signs/symptoms of sleep disturbance.At each visit
Endocrine Monitor for hypoglycemia.As clinically indicated, primarily in infancy
Family/Community Assess family need for social work support (e.g., palliative/respite care, home nursing, other local resources), care coordination, or follow-up genetic counseling if new questions arise (e.g., family planning).At each visit

ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ASD = autism spectrum disorder

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Off-label sirolimus (rapamycin) has been used in seven individuals with SKS [Liu et al 2024] at low-to-moderate doses (0.5-2 mg/day) with parent-reported improvements in some behaviors, including verbal skills, attention span, self-aggression, and hyperphagia.

Note: Individuals with SKS have experienced sleep-wake cycle abnormalities when sirolimus trough levels exceeded 3 ng/mL, suggesting that a lower dose with target levels of <3 ng/mL should be considered for individuals with SKS. While further controlled and objective clinical studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of sirolimus in this population, it is recommended to monitor sleep-wake behavior closely in individuals with SKS treated with sirolimus and adjust the dose accordingly for optimal benefit and overall health.

Before using mTOR, it is advisable or necessary to assess the biochemical and functional impacts of the pathogenic variant in the affected individual to optimize dosing and timing. Additionally, it is noted that first-generation, second-generation, and third-generation inhibitors may have distinct mechanisms and off-target effects.

Rx-Matcher is a free web platform established at the University of Washington that enables clinicians and researchers to share experiences with off-label drug treatments in genetic diseases. The system supports submission and browsing of treatment reports and facilitates optional connections between users who have tried similar therapeutic approaches.

Note: Any off-label use of drugs should be done at the discretion of the treating physician in conjunction with the affected individual and/or caregiver and is not endorsed by GeneReviews or the authors of this chapter.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (SKS) is an autosomal dominant disorder typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant.

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

Sibs of a proband. The risk to the sibs of the proband depends on the clinical/genetic status of the proband's parents:

Offspring of a proband. Each child of an individual with SKS has a 50% chance of inheriting the MTOR pathogenic variant.

Other family members. The risk to other family members depends on the status of the proband's parents: if a parent has the pathogenic variant, the parent's family members may be at risk.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected.

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the MTOR pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing. While most health care professionals would consider use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A.

Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome: Genes and Databases

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from HGNC; chromosome locus from OMIM; protein from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click here.

Table B.

OMIM Entries for Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome (View All in OMIM)

601231MECHANISTIC TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN; MTOR
616638SMITH-KINGSMORE SYNDROME; SKS

Molecular Pathogenesis

Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (SKS) is typically caused by gain-of-function pathogenic variants in MTOR, the gene encoding serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR (also called mammalian or mechanistic target of rapamycin; mTOR), a serine/threonine kinase that serves as a central regulator of cell growth, proliferation, metabolism, and autophagy. These pathogenic variants result in hyperactivation of the mTOR signaling pathway, particularly within the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1), leading to dysregulated cellular homeostasis [Shimobayashi & Hall 2014, Saxton & Sabatini 2017].

Signals from nutrients, energy status, and growth factors are integrated by mTOR to regulate anabolic and catabolic processes. In the central nervous system, mTOR plays a critical role in neurodevelopment, synaptic plasticity, and circadian rhythm regulation. Dysregulated mTOR activity is believed to underlie the neurodevelopmental features, epilepsy, macrocephaly, and sleep disturbances characteristic of SKS.

Mechanism of disease causation. Gain of function

MTOR-specific laboratory technical considerations. Because of the possibility of an affected individual having a mosaic MTOR pathogenic variant, use of deep sequencing (e.g., deep next-generation sequencing, amplicon sequencing, or droplet digital PCR) on an appropriate sample may be necessary. Standard-depth exome sequencing can miss mosaic MTOR variants, especially if performed on blood-derived DNA.

Table 7.

MTOR Pathogenic Variants Referenced in This GeneReview

Reference SequencesDNA Nucleotide ChangePredicted Protein ChangeComment [Reference]
NM_004958​.4
NP_004949​.1
c.5395G>Ap.Glu1799LysOne of the most common pathogenic variants in persons w/SKS [Moosa et al 2017, Liu et al 2024] (See Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.)

SKS = Smith-Kingsmore syndrome

Variants listed in the table have been provided by the authors. GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.

GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen​.hgvs.org). See Quick Reference for an explanation of nomenclature.

Chapter Notes

Author Notes

Carlos E Prada, gro.snerdlihceirul@adarpc

  • Clinical work: neurofibromatosis, RASopathies, lysosomal storage disorders, metabolic disorders, and implementation of genomics in clinical care
  • Research interests: development of biomarkers for rare disease, clinical trials, and gene discovery

Carolyn R Raski, gro.snerdlihceirul@iksarc

  • Clinical work: RASopathies, neurofibromatosis, neurodevelopmental disorders, and implementation of genomics in clinical care
  • Research interests: development of biomarkers for rare disease, clinical trials, and gene discovery

Ghayda Mirzaa, gro.snerdlihcelttaes@aazrim.adyahg

Aaron Besterman, ude.dscu.htlaeh@namretseba

  • Clinical work: child and adolescent psychiatric disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, and rare neurogenetic disorders
  • Research interests: precision medicine in psychiatry, genetic diagnostics in rare neurodevelopmental conditions, abd immunopsychiatry

Darcy A Krueger, gro.cmhcc@regeurk.ycrad

  • Clinical work: tuberous sclerosis, neurofibromatosis, mTORopathies, and RASopathies
  • Research interests: translational research and clinical trials in tuberous sclerosis and related disorders

Andrew C. Liu, ude.lfu@uil.werdna

  • Research interests: molecular, cellular, and physiologic mechanisms of circadian rhythms and sleep-wake behavior in mammals

Acknowledgments

The authors of this chapter would like to thank the leadership of the Smith-Kingsmore Syndrome Foundation as well as the many families with SKS who have shared their families' experiences in clinic, in research, and at family meetings for their selflessness and advocacy, without which the current awareness and understanding of SKS would not be possible. We would also like to acknowledge the time and effort of the research teams who collected much of the currently published data including Lindsey Aschbacher-Smith, MS, CCRP, without whom much of this work would not be possible. This research is supported at least in part by the National Institutes of Health NINDS R01 NS117457 (to ACL).

Revision History

  • 20 November 2025 (ma) Review posted live
  • 13 February 2025 (cp) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • Baynam G, Overkov A, Davis M, Mina K, Schofield L, Allcock R, Laing N, Cook M, Dawkins H, Goldblatt J. A germline MTOR mutation in Aboriginal Australian siblings with intellectual disability, dysmorphism, macrocephaly, and small thoraces. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167:1659-67. [PubMed: 25851998]
  • Besterman AD, Althoff T, Elfferich P, Gutierrez-Mejia I, Sadik J, Bernstein JA, van Ierland Y, Kattentidt-Mouravieva AA, Nellist M, Abramson J, Martinez-Agosto JA. Functional and structural analyses of novel Smith-Kingsmore syndrome-associated MTOR variants reveal potential new mechanisms and predictors of pathogenicity. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:e1009651. [PMC free article: PMC8279410] [PubMed: 34197453]
  • Bonnet JB, Durieux AT, Tournayre S, Marty L, Sultan A, Avignon A. Semaglutide as a potential treatment for obesity in Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (SKS) patients: a mosaic mutation case report. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2024;18:159-62. [PubMed: 38582735]
  • Carli D, Ferrero GB, Fusillo A, Coppo P, La Selva R, Zinali F, Cardaropoli S, Ranieri C, Iacoviello M, Resta N, Mussa A. A new case of Smith-Kingsmore syndrome with somatic MTOR pathogenic variant expands the phenotypic spectrum to lateralized overgrowth. Clin Genet. 2021;99:719-23. [PubMed: 33506498]
  • Carmignac V, Mignot C, Blanchard E, Kuentz P, Aubriot-Lorton MH, Parker VER, Sorlin A, Fraitag S, Courcet JB, Duffourd Y, Rodriguez D, Knox RG, Polubothu S, Boland A, Olaso R, Delepine M, Darmency V, Riachi M, Quelin C, Rollier P, Goujon L, Grotto S, Capri Y, Jacquemont ML, Odent S, Amram D, Chevarin M, Vincent-Delorme C, Catteau B, Guibaud L, Arzimanoglou A, Keddar M, Sarret C, Callier P, Bessis D, Genevieve D, Deleuze JF, Thauvin C, Semple RK, Philippe C, Riviere JB, Kinsler VA, Faivre L, Vabres P. Clinical spectrum of MTOR-related hypomelanosis of Ito with neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Genet Med. 2021;23:1484-91. [PMC free article: PMC8354853] [PubMed: 33833411]
  • Everett TR, English S, Schirwani S, Bass C, Cliffe H, Prescott K. EP09.10: Antenatal diagnosis of Smith-Kingsmore syndrome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2022;60:123.
  • Gordo G, Tenorio J, Arias P, Santos-Simarro F, Garcia-Minaur S, Moreno JC, Nevado J, Vallespin E, Rodriguez-Laguna L, de Mena R, Dapia I, Palomares-Bralo M, Del Pozo A, Ibanez K, Silla JC, Barroso E, Ruiz-Perez VL, Martinez-Glez V, Lapunzina P. mTOR mutations in Smith-Kingsmore syndrome: four additional patients and a review. Clin Genet. 2018;93:762-75. [PubMed: 28892148]
  • Handoko M, Emrick LT, Rosenfeld JA, Wang X, Tran AA, Turner A, Belmont JW, Undiagnosed Diseases N, Lee BH, Bacino CA, Chao HT. Recurrent mosaic MTOR c.5930C > T (p.Thr1977Ile) variant causing megalencephaly, asymmetric polymicrogyria, and cutaneous pigmentary mosaicism: case report and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179:475-9. [PubMed: 30569621]
  • Lee D, Jang J-H, Lee CG. Smith-Kingsmore syndrome: the first report of a Korean patient with the MTOR germline mutation c.5395G>A p.(Glu1799Lys). J Genet Med. 2019;16:27-30.
  • Lim JS, Kim WI, Kang HC, Kim SH, Park AH, Park EK, Cho YW, Kim S, Kim HM, Kim JA, Kim J, Rhee H, Kang SG, Kim HD, Kim D, Kim DS, Lee JH. Brain somatic mutations in MTOR cause focal cortical dysplasia type II leading to intractable epilepsy. Nat Med. 2015;21:395-400. [PubMed: 25799227]
  • Liu AC, Shen Y, Serbinski CR, He H, Roman D, Endale M, Aschbacher-Smith L, King KA, Granadillo JL, López I, Krueger DA, Dye TJ, Smith DF, Hogenesch JB, Prada CE. Clinical and functional studies of MTOR variants in Smith-Kingsmore syndrome reveal deficits of circadian rhythm and sleep-wake behavior. HGG Adv. 2024;5:100333. [PMC free article: PMC11342114] [PubMed: 39030910]
  • Manickam K, McClain MR, Demmer LA, Biswas S, Kearney HM, Malinowski J, Massingham LJ, Miller D, Yu TW, Hisama FM; ACMG Board of Directors. Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021;23:2029-37. [PubMed: 34211152]
  • Mirzaa GM, Campbell CD, Solovieff N, Goold C, Jansen LA, Menon S, Timms AE, Conti V, Biag JD, Adams C, Boyle EA, Collins S, Ishak G, Poliachik S, Girisha KM, Yeung KS, Chung BHY, Rahikkala E, Gunter SA, McDaniel SS, Macmurdo CF, Bernstein JA, Martin B, Leary R, Mahan S, Liu S, Weaver M, Doerschner M, Jhangiani S, Muzny DM, Boerwinkle E, Gibbs RA, Lupski JR, Shendure J, Saneto RP, Novotny EJ, Wilson CJ, Sellers WR, Morrissey M, Hevner RF, Ojemann JG, Guerrini R, Murphy LO, Winckler W, Dobyns WB. Association of MTOR mutations with developmental brain disorders, including megalencephaly, focal cortical dysplasia, and pigmentary mosaicism. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:836-45. [PMC free article: PMC4979321] [PubMed: 27159400]
  • Møller RS, Weckhuysen S, Chipaux M, Marsan E, Taly V, Bebin EM, Hiatt SM, Prokop JW, Bowling KM, Mei D, Conti V, de la Grange P, Ferrand-Sorbets S, Dorfmüller G, Lambrecq V, Larsen LH, Leguern E, Guerrini R, Rubboli G, Cooper GM, Baulac S. Germline and somatic mutations in the MTOR gene in focal cortical dysplasia and epilepsy. Neurol Genet. 2016;2:e118. [PMC free article: PMC5089441] [PubMed: 27830187]
  • Moosa S, Böhrer-Rabel H, Altmüller J, Beleggia F, Nürnberg P, Li Y, Yigit G, Wollnik B. Smith-Kingsmore syndrome: a third family with the MTOR mutation c.5395G>A p.(Glu1799Lys) and evidence for paternal gonadal mosaicism. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2017;173:264-7. [PubMed: 27753196]
  • Mroske C, Rasmussen K, Shinde DN, Huether R, Powis Z, Lu H-M, Baxter RM, McPherson E, Tang S. Germline activating MTOR mutation arising through gonadal mosaicism in two brothers with megalencephaly and neurodevelopmental abnormalities. BMC Med. Genet. 2015;16:102. [PMC free article: PMC4635597] [PubMed: 26542245]
  • Poole RL, Curry PDK, Marcinkute R, Brewer C, Coman D, Hobson E, Johnson D, Lynch SA, Saggar A, Searle C, Scurr I, Turnpenny PD, Vasudevan P, Tatton-Brown K. Delineating the Smith-Kingsmore syndrome phenotype: investigation of 16 patients with the MTOR c.5395G>A p.(Glu1799Lys) missense variant. Am J Med Genet A. 2021;185:2445-54. [PubMed: 34032352]
  • Resta N, Calabrese O, Grossi V, Lugli L, Simone C, Ranieri C, Piglionica M, Lepore Signorile M, Rossi K, Carli D, Mussa A. Correspondence on "Clinical spectrum of MTOR-related hypomelanosis of Ito with neurodevelopmental abnormalities," by Carmignac et al. Genet Med. 2021;23:2223-4. [PubMed: 34234302]
  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405-24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]
  • Rodan LH, Stoler J, Chen E, Geleske T; Council on Genetics. Genetic evaluation of the child with intellectual disability or global developmental delay: clinical report. Pediatrics. 2025;156:e2025072219. [PubMed: 40545261]
  • Rodríguez-García ME, Cotrina-Vinagre FJ, Bellusci M, Martínez de Aragón A, Hernández-Sánchez L, Carnicero-Rodríguez P, Martín-Hernández E, Martínez-Azorín F. A novel de novo MTOR gain-of-function variant in a patient with Smith-Kingsmore syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27:1369-78. [PMC free article: PMC6777539] [PubMed: 31053780]
  • Saxton, RA, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 2017;169:361-71. [PubMed: 28388417]
  • Shimobayashi M, Hall MN. Making new contacts: the mTOR network in metabolism and signaling crosstalk. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:155-62. [PubMed: 24556838]
  • Simonelli V, Ferrari AR, Battini R, Brovedani P, Bartolini E. Midline non-ictal rhythmic waveforms as possible electroencephalographic biomarkers of Smith-Klingsmore syndrome in children. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2024;9:102-5. [PMC free article: PMC10940733] [PubMed: 38495955]
  • Smith LD, Saunder CL, Dinwiddie DL, Atherton AM, Miler NA, Soden SE, Farrow EG, Abdelmoity AT, Kingsmore SF. Exome sequencing reveals de novo germline mutation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) in a patient with megalencephaly and intractable seizures. Journal of Genomes and Exomes. 2013;2:63-72.
  • Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Chapman M, Evans K, Azevedo L, Hayden M, Heywood S, Millar DS, Phillips AD, Cooper DN. The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®): optimizing its use in a clinical diagnostic or research setting. Hum Genet. 2020;139:1197-207. [PMC free article: PMC7497289] [PubMed: 32596782]
  • Szczałuba K, Rydzanicz M, Walczak A, Kosińska J, Koppolu A, Biernacka A, Iwanicka-Pronicka K, Grajkowska W, Jurkiewicz E, Kowalczyk P, Płoski R. Brain tissue low-level mosaicism for MTOR mutation causes Smith-Kingsmore phenotype with recurrent hypoglycemia-a novel phenotype and a further proof for testing of an affected tissue. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11:1269. [PMC free article: PMC8303645] [PubMed: 34359351]
Copyright © 1993-2026, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved. Test.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (https://www.genereviews.org) and copyright (© 1993-2026 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: addmast@wu.edu

Bookshelf ID: NBK619247PMID: 41264764

Views

Tests in GTR by Gene

Related information

  • OMIM
    Related OMIM records
  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed
  • Gene
    Locus Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...