U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Office of the Surgeon General (OSG). Firearm Violence: A Public Health Crisis in America: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory [Internet]. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services (US); 2024.

Cover of Firearm Violence: A Public Health Crisis in America

Firearm Violence: A Public Health Crisis in America: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory [Internet].

Show details

Chapter 1Firearm Violence in the U.S.: Death and Injury

Firearm-Related Death

The rate of firearm-related deaths in our nation has been rising and reached a near three-decade high in 2021.2 This crisis is being driven, in particular, by increases in firearm-related homicides over the last decade and firearm-related suicides over the last two decades.2 Across all firearm-related deaths in 2022, more than half (56.1%) were from suicide, 40.8% were from homicide, and the remaining were from legal intervention,b unintentional injuries, and injuries of unknown intent.2 The age-adjusted rate of firearm-related suicide increased by 20.1% from 2012 (6.3 per 100,000) to 2022 (7.6 per 100,000), with an absolute increase from 20,666 to 27,032 deaths over the same period.2 The age-adjusted rate of firearm-related homicide increased by 62.5% from 2012 (3.8 per 100,000) to 2022 (6.2 per 100,000), with an absolute increase from 11,622 to 19,651 deaths over the same period.2

Despite these increases over time in firearm-related deaths, the number of firearm-related homicides decreased from 20,958 (6.7 per 100,000 [age-adjusted]) in 2021 to 19,651 (6.2 per 100,000 [age-adjusted]) in 2022.2 Furthermore, the provisional firearm-related homicide rate for 2023 (part-year) is lower than the rate in 2022.4 The provisional firearm-related suicide rate for 2023 (part-year) remains comparable to the rate in 2022.5

When measured over a decade (2012 to 2022), children and younger populations experienced a staggering increase in firearm-related suicide rates: 43% for 25–34-year-olds (6.5 per 100,000 [crude rate]) in 2012 to (9.3 per 100,000 [crude rate]) in 2022, 45% for 15–24-year-olds (5.0 per 100,000 [crude rate]) in 2012 to (7.3 per 100,000 [crude rate]) in 2022, and 68% for children aged 10–14 (0.50 per 100,000 [crude rate]) in 2012 to (0.84 per 100,000 [crude rate]) in 2022 (Figure 3).2

Rate of firearm-related suicide increased by 20% across the population, with the highest increases among younger people

FIGURE 3

Rate of firearm-related suicide in the United States increased by 20% across the population, with the highest increases among younger people.

The rate of firearm-related deaths in our nation has been rising and reached a near three-decade high in 2021.2

Firearm-Related Death: International Comparison

Rates of firearm-related death in the U.S. are significantly higher than rates in other high-income countries. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) found that, in 2015, the overall firearm-related death rate was 11.4 times higher in the U.S. compared to 28 other high-income nations.6 During the same year, 83.7% of all firearm-related deaths across the 29 countries studied occurred in the U.S. despite the U.S. only accounting for about 31% of the combined population.6

The discrepancy between the U.S. and peer nations is even more stark when it comes to firearm-related mortality among children and adolescents. Across the 29 countries referenced, in 2015, more than 9 in 10 children (ages 0–14) who died from firearm-related injuries lived in the U.S. (97% of children ages 0–4, and 92% of children ages 5–14).6 More recently, data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) showed that, in 2019, the rate of firearm mortality among children and adolescents (ages 1–19) in the U.S. (36.4 per one million) was more than 5 times the rate of firearm mortality among the same age group in Canada (6.2 per one million), about 18 times the rate of firearm mortality in Sweden (2.0 per one million), and more than 22 times the rate of firearm mortality in Australia (1.6 per one million) (Figure 4).7

Comparison of firearm mortality rates among children and adolescents in select OECD nations.

FIGURE 4

Comparison of firearm mortality rates among children and adolescents in select OECD nations.

In 2015, the overall firearm-related death rate was 11.4 times higher in the U.S. compared to 28 other high-income nations.6

Firearm-Related Death: Disproportionate Impacts

Firearm homicides and suicides are not equally distributed, and disparities have been longstanding across population groups in the U.S. In 2022, Black persons endured the highest age-adjusted firearm homicide rates across all ages (27.0 per 100,000 (Black or African American) as compared to 6.2 per 100,000 (all races/ethnicities)c).2 In 2022, White individuals ages 45 years and older had the highest rate of firearm suicide (14.8 per 100,000 vs. 11.1 per 100,000 all races/ethnicities ≥45 years); while the firearm suicide rate for people under age 45 years old was highest among American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons (12.3 per 100,000 vs. 5.9 per 100,000 all races/ethnicities <45 years).2 The firearm suicide rate was also significantly higher among Veterans in 2021: 62.4% higher for Veteran men than for non-Veteran men and 281.1% higher for Veteran women than for non-Veteran women.8

There are noteworthy disparities in firearm-related deaths by sex. In 2022, males were approximately six times as likely to die from firearm-related injury than females (41,302 firearm-related deaths among males and 6,902 firearm-related deaths among females).2 Despite higher numbers of total firearm-related deaths among males, the intersection of intimate partner violence (IPV) and firearm violence disproportionately impacts females. Firearms are used in about 50% of all IPV-related homicides.9, 10 In 2021, the proportion of homicides attributable to IPV was five times higher for female victims as compared to male victims.11

Among youth, disparities by sex and race are also evident. In 2022, male children and adolescents (ages 1–19) were more than five times as likely than their female counterparts to die from a firearm-related injury (3,926 firearm deaths for males and 677 firearm deaths for females).2 When assessing types of firearm-related deaths in 2022 among White children and adolescents (ages 1–19), 29% were homicides (352 of 1,194) and 63% were suicides (757 of 1,194).2 Among Black children and adolescents (ages 1–19), 86% of firearm-related deaths were homicides (1,961 of 2,279) and 10% were suicides (220 of 2,279).2 Among Hispanic children and adolescents (all-races), 76% were homicides (688 of 909) and 18% were suicides (168 of 909); among Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander children and adolescents, 39% were homicides (26 of 66) and 55% were suicides (36 of 66); and among American Indian or Alaska Native children and adolescents, 44% were homicides (29 of 66) and 48% were suicides (32 of 66).2 CDC data for 2022 show that the firearm suicide rate among Black adolescents (age 10–19) surpassed the rate among White adolescents (age 10–19) for the first time on record.2

Overall, in 2022, Black children and adolescents accounted for about half of all firearm-related deaths among U.S. children and adolescents, despite making up only 14% of the U.S. child and adolescent population.2, 12

Firearm-Related Death: Mass Shootings

While mass shootingd deaths represent only about 1% of all firearm-related deaths in the U.S., the number of mass shooting incidents is increasing.13, 14 According to data published by Gun Violence Archive, the U.S. experienced more than 600 mass shooting incidents each year between 2020 and 2023, compared to an average of less than 400 annual mass shooting incidents between 2015 and 2018.15 An analysis of the National Violent Death Reporting System found that compared to single homicides (1 victim) and multiple homicides (2–3 victims), mass homicidese (4 or more victims, besides the perpetrator) had the highest proportion of female victims (52%), the highest proportion of White victims (56%), and the highest proportion of child victims (more than a quarter were younger than 18 years old).16 Another analysis of mass shootings between 2014–2019 found that most incidents were associated with domestic violence (59%), which was defined as at least one victim being a dating partner or family member of the perpetrator, and that domestic violence-related mass shootings had higher average case fatality rates than those unrelated to domestic violence (84% vs 63%).17

Despite accounting for a relatively small number of firearm deaths, mass shooting incidents cause outsized collective trauma on society and have a strong negative effect on the public’s perception of safety (see “Collective Toll” section on page 14). More than three-quarters of adults (79%) in the U.S. report experiencing stress from the possibility of a mass shooting, and one in three adults (33%) say fear prevents them from going to certain places or events.18

More than three-quarters of adults (79%) in the U.S. report experiencing stress from the possibility of a mass shooting, and one in three adults (33%) say fear prevents them from going to certain places or events.18

Mass shootings elicit significant fear and concern among the public and can lead to misconceptions about perpetrator characteristics. While findings suggest that perpetrators of mass homicides are more likely to experience mental health challenges than perpetrators of single homicides,16 research also supports that one’s mental health diagnosis or psychological profile alone is not a strong predictor of perpetrating violence of any type, including a mass shooting.19, 20, 21 An FBI report that examined active shooter incidents in the U.S. between 2000–2013 could only verify that one quarter of perpetrators had been diagnosed with a mental illness of any kind prior to the offensef.19 Importantly, most people with serious mental illness are not violent against others.22, 23 In fact, people with serious mental illnessesg are more likely to be victims of violence compared to the general population, even after controlling for demographic differences.23, 24

Other individual and interpersonal level factors, outside of mental health diagnoses, may also play a role in the risk of perpetrating a mass homicide.19, 21, 25, 26 According to a 2023 Department of Homeland Security report on mass attacks in public spaces (the majority of which are perpetrated with firearms) from 2016–2020, about a quarter (24%) of perpetrators had a diagnosed mental health condition prior to or at the time of their attackh, whereas nearly all attackers (93%) experienced at least one significant stressor within five years prior to the attack and 77% experienced such stressors within one year.26 These acute and/or persistent life stressors involved romantic and family relationships (51%), such as death of a loved one or divorce; employment issues (32%), such as poor performance or termination; and negative social interactions (19%), such as being bullied in school or experiencing social exclusion, among others.26

Firearm-Related Injury

Physical and mental health impacts caused by nonfatal firearm injuries can be significant. Compared to those who lose their lives from firearm injuries each year, many more people are injured with a firearm and survive.27 Although firearm-related injury rates are difficult to measure due to challenges with collecting national injury data, studies suggest that there are at least twice as many nonfatal firearm injuries as fatal firearm injuries.27, 28 Abstractor coded data indicate that most nonfatal firearm injuries treated in emergency departments are deemed to be a result of assaults, followed by unintentional injuries.28, 29

From 2019 to 2022, the mean number of weekly emergency department visits for firearm injuries was consistently highest among young people (15–24 years old), compared to all other age groups.30 The youngest age group (0–14 years old) saw the largest increases in the proportion of firearm-related injury emergency department visits during 2020–2022, compared with 2019.30

The impact of surviving a firearm injury includes short-term and long-term health consequences. Physical health consequences for individuals can include, but are not limited to, new limitations to physical functioning; physical disabilities from injury; and increased diagnoses of chronic pain.31, 32, 33 Chronic behavioral health problems are also attributable to firearm injuries such as post-traumatic stress disorders, anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders.33, 34, 35, 36 Examination of data from commercial health insurance claims from 2007–2021 suggests that children and adolescents (ages 0–19) who survived a firearm injury experienced long term negative health consequences.35 Through one year after injury, compared to matched controls who did not experience a firearm injury, the survivors experienced a 117% increase in pain disorders (e.g. musculoskeletal pain, headache, and other pain syndromes), a 68% increase in psychiatric disorders (trauma- and stress-related disorders such as major depressive disorders, and other psychiatric disorders), and a 144% increase in substance use disorders (i.e., alcohol or drug use disorders).35

Further, in a cohort study of 183 adults who survived a firearm injury from 2008–2017, individuals (median time from injury, 5.9 years) self-reported worse physical and mental health compared with the general population.32 Nearly 50% of these participants who survived a firearm injury were identified as having probable post-traumatic stress disorder, as compared to a 6.8% lifetime prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in the U.S. general population.32 Rates of unemployment and substance use among the firearm-injury survivor group also increased by 14.3% and 13.2%, respectively, after injury.32

Footnotes

b

The CDC defines legal intervention as, “firearm injuries inflicted by the police or other law enforcement agents acting in the line of duty.” The term legal intervention is a commonly used external cause of injury classification. It does not indicate the legality of the circumstances surrounding the death. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024, March). About firearm injury and death. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www​.cdc.gov/firearm-violence​/about/index.html).

c

Unless stated otherwise, the race categories Black, White, Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native should generally be taken to imply “non-Hispanic.” The Office of Management and Budget defines “Hispanic or Latino” as a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race. (United States Census Bureau. (n.d). Why we ask questions about… Hispanic or Latino origin. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www​.census.gov​/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/ethnicity/)

d

The definition of mass shooting varies by source. The Congressional Research Service defines “mass shootings” as “a multiple homicide incident in which four or more victims are killed by firearms, within one event, and in one or more locations in proximity.” (Krouse, W.J & Richardson, D.J. (2015) Mass murder with firearms: incidents and victims, 1999–2013. Congressional Research Service. https://sgp​.fas.org/crs/misc/R44126.pdf). This Advisory uses a broader definition based on the Gun Violence Archive definition of a mass shooting as four or more shot or killed, not including the shooter. (Gun Violence Archive. (2023). General methodology. https://www​.gunviolencearchive​.org/methodology)

e

All types of mass homicides, including mass shootings.

f

Per the report, “the number of documented, diagnosed mental illness may be the result of a number of factors, including those related to situational factors (access to health care) as well as those related to the study factors (access to mental health records).” The FBI could not determine if a diagnosis had been given in 37% of cases.

g

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), serious mental illness in adults is defined as, “someone over 18 having (within the past year) a diagnosable mental, behavior, or emotional disorder that causes serious functional impairment that substantially interferes with or limits one or more major life activities.” (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2023). Mental health and substance use disorders. https://www​.samhsa.gov​/find-help/disorders). Serious mental illness commonly refers to, “a diagnosis of psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, and either major depression with psychotic symptoms or treatment-resistant depression.” (Evans, T. S., Berkman, N., Brown, C., Gaynes, B., & Weber, R. P. (2016). Disparities within serious mental illness. (AHRQ Publication No. 16-EHC027-EF) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/books/NBK368427/).

h

Formally diagnosed mental health conditions included depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. The percentage does not include perpetrators who had observable symptoms without a formal diagnosis.

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (4.4M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...