Continuing Education Activity

Medial epicondyle apophysitis, commonly referred to as Little League Elbow, is an overuse injury that primarily affects adolescent athletes participating in sports that involve repetitive overhead motions, such as baseball, tennis, or volleyball. The condition results from repetitive valgus stress applied to the medial elbow during activities like pitching or serving, which leads to inflammation and microtrauma at the growth plate of the medial epicondyle. Medial epicondyle apophysitis typically presents with medial elbow pain that worsens with activity and may be accompanied by reduced throwing velocity or accuracy. Early recognition and intervention are crucial in preventing long-term complications, such as chronic instability or premature closure of the growth plate, which can impair function.

This course equips participants with a detailed understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, imaging, and evidence-based treatment strategies for medial epicondyle apophysitis. Emphasis is placed on activity modification, rehabilitation planning, and gradual return-to-play protocols. The course also highlights the collaborative role of pediatricians, sports medicine specialists, physical therapists, athletic trainers, and radiologists in managing medial epicondyle apophysitis. Through interprofessional communication and coordinated care, the healthcare team ensures accurate diagnoses, timely interventions, and individualized treatments, ultimately supporting safe recovery and preventing recurrence in young athletes.

Objectives:

• Identify the risk factors associated with the development of medial epicondyle apophysitis.
• Assess the epidemiology of medial epicondyle apophysitis.
• Evaluate the presentation of a patient with medial epicondyle apophysitis.
• Emphasize the importance of interprofessional healthcare team collaboration in the timely recognition, accurate diagnosis, and effective treatment of medial epicondyle apophysitis.

Introduction

Medial epicondyle apophysitis (MEA), also known as little league elbow, is an overuse injury prevalent among adolescent athletes who participate in sports that involve repetitive overhand throwing, racket use, or other overhead arm motions. The medial epicondyle is a bony protrusion on the medial aspect of the elbow, with its ossification center separate from the main distal humeral physis, known as an apophysis. This growth center at the medial epicondyle develops around 6-7 years of age and typically fuses by age 15.[1][2] The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) and the flexor-pronator muscle groups originate at the medial epicondyle and serve to stabilize the elbow against valgus stress.[3][4] MEA occurs due to excessive and repetitive valgus stress placed on the apophysis before its closure. Over time, the repetitive strain results in a traction-type injury, which may cause pathologic widening and inflammation of the apophysis, or even an avulsion fracture.[2] MEA may cause significant morbidity in young athletes, who must temporarily refrain from their chosen sport until the pain improves and healing occurs. Proper prevention, identification, and prompt treatment of MEA can enable young adolescents to continue participating in the sports they enjoy without prolonged interruptions to their athletic seasons.

Etiology

The biomechanics of a typical overhead throw or serve places significant valgus stress on the elbow.[4] Sports involving repetitive overhead arm motions, such as baseball, softball, volleyball, tennis, football, swimming, and javelin throwing, may lead to apophysitis of the medial epicondyle.[5] Baseball pitching is the activity most commonly associated with MEA. Risk factors for developing MEA among baseball players include a high volume of pitches per game, baseball pitch velocity, continued pitching time despite arm fatigue, and participation on multiple baseball teams.[5] The alternate position of catcher, as well as the number of innings and months, pitched per year, may also be associated with MEA, but additional research is required.[6]

Epidemiology

MEA occurs only in children aged 6-15 years, as the apophyseal ossification center fuses around age 15. Of all youth sports injuries, about half are due to overuse.[7] According to the high school sports-related injury surveillance studies, the overall risk of injury increased by 15% between 2011 and 2016, and the proportion of baseball injuries associated with the elbow nearly doubled in the same time frame. Factors include increased youth engagement in organized sports, heightened competition at younger ages, playing on multiple teams simultaneously, and earlier specialization in sports, often with year-round play.[8][9][10] In baseball, the prevalence of medial elbow pain increases with age, and the prevalence of MEA peaks between the ages of 11 and 12, with a rate of about 30%. X-ray screening of Little League Baseball regional and national championship contenders showed that 57% had radiographic evidence of medial epicondyle displacement.[11] Regarding gender demographics, females typically have more sports-related overuse injuries, but since so many young males play baseball, the incidence of MEA is likely higher in boys.[11][12] It is challenging to determine whether males are indeed at a higher risk for MEA physiologically than females, or if they have increased exposure to biomechanics that induce MEA.

Pathophysiology

MEA results from repetitive valgus stress of the UCL exerting traction on the medial epicondyle of the humerus. Excessive stress on this kinetic chain causes injury at the weakest point – the open apophysis, which is 5 times weaker than the UCL. With repetitive, highly forceful valgus stress, as seen in baseball pitching or another overhead throwing, particularly in the late cocking phase of the throw, the apophysis can get inflamed and partially separate from the distal humerus. Continued stress on this weakened connection can complicate the injury with an acute avulsion fracture.[2]

History and Physical

Prompt and accurate diagnosis of MEA requires a thorough history and physical of young athletes presenting with medial elbow pain. Important historical clues include an age range of 6 to 15 years old with a history of participating in a sporting activity that requires repetitive overhead motions. If the patient regularly participates in a sport, providers should inquire about the position played, frequency, and duration of athletic activity, as well as the type of overhead arm motion required for the sport. The typical presentation of MEA is an insidious onset of progressively worsening medial elbow pain associated with overhead throwing and decreased throwing performance and endurance.[4] Additionally, in patients whose MEA is complicated by an avulsion fracture, they may describe acute pain with a “pop” sensation at the time of avulsion injury.[12]

The physical exam is vital for the diagnosis of MEA. The patient typically presents with tenderness at the medial epicondyle point, medial elbow pain exacerbated by valgus stress, and occasionally subtle elbow contractures.[8][4] Special exam maneuvers developed for UCL injury can be used for MEA, given the similarity of injuries. The moving valgus stress test is the gold standard exam for UCL injury, with 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity.[13] This exam technique involves applying a constant valgus torque to a fully flexed elbow as it is fully extended. The test is positive if medial elbow pain is reproduced. The “milking maneuver” involves applying a valgus torque to the elbow, with the elbow flexed at 90°, while anchoring the elbow and supinating the wrist.[8] Avulsion fractures of the medial epicondyle can have additional exam findings, including elbow instability, reduced ROM, and ulnar neuropathy.[14] In addition to a thorough elbow exam, providers should conduct a neurological exam to assess for ulnar nerve deficits and rule out other potential causes of arm pain and weakness that may originate from the wrist, shoulder, or cervical spine.[4]

Evaluation

Imaging is a vital part of evaluating young athletes with risk factors and an exam concerning MEA. Initial studies should include bilateral anterior, posterior, and lateral plain radiographs of the elbows, as well as a lateral image of the elbows flexed at 90° with valgus stress applied.[8] MEA appears as a widening of the medial epicondylar physis with a ragged and sclerotic appearance of the border of the ossification center.[15] Image A shows MEA in the right elbow, and image B shows a normal left elbow [15]. Elbow instability is identified radiographically as greater than 3 millimeters of joint separation in the stress radiograph.[8] In the clinic setting, point-of-care ultrasound may be helpful as it has an 88% positive predictive value in identifying MEA when used by an experienced provider.[16] However, the meaning of a negative ultrasound in a symptomatic patient has not been studied. Therefore, radiographic evaluation is still recommended.

Accurate diagnosis of MEA requires bilateral radiographs to compare the patient’s anatomy and better evaluate for an avulsion fracture. The ossification centers (physes) close at inconsistent ages during adolescence, and bilateral comparison allows the radiologist to evaluate whether the patient’s physes are still open. Bilateral imaging is also helpful in identifying a missing ossification center. Avulsion fractures should be suspected if an ossification center is missing unilaterally or if the MEA is missing, but the trochlear, olecranon, or lateral epicondyle ossification centers are present. Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are only indicated for medial epicondyle avulsion fractures or apophysitis that do not respond to therapy. They are helpful in more accurately determining the degree of epicondylar displacement and the need for operative versus non-operative management.[8][17][18] In older athletes with near closure of their apophysis, an MRI may be indicated to evaluate for concurrent UCL tears.[16]

Treatment / Management

The foundation of treatment for MEA is rest from the exacerbating sport and cessation of its repetitive overhead arm motion. Athletes should fully rest the affected arm for 4 to 6 weeks. The use of ice and analgesics such as acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications may be used for pain control. After refraining from overhead motions for at least 6 weeks, if pain-free, athletes may begin physical therapy that focuses on strengthening exercises for the elbow and shoulder. They can then initiate a gradual return to a throwing program over the subsequent 6 weeks, with set limitations on throws/pitches.[4][19] Unfortunately, recurrence rates are high and may require an even more conservative graded rehabilitation. If symptoms continue to return after periods of pitch/throw rest, the athlete should cease play for the remainder of the sports season and consider transitioning to a less demanding position or even refraining from the sport until the fusion of the apophysis.[20]

A common complication of MEA is an avulsion fracture of the medial epicondyle, which responds well to nonoperative treatment. Treatment begins with a long-arm cast for 2 to 4 weeks, followed by a posterior splint, accompanied by passive range-of-motion exercises 3 to 5 times daily. Once the patient has no tenderness to the medial epicondyle, they wear a hinged elbow brace for 6 to 8 weeks. After brace removal, the patient can begin physical therapy to avoid strengthening the flexor and pronator muscle groups until the bony union has been confirmed.[14] If the patient develops elbow laxity, instability, or greater than 75% displacement of the medial epicondyle avulsion fracture, surgical management with open reduction and internal fixation may be necessary. Post-surgical care is similar to that of patients treated non-operatively.[14] For patients with 25% to 75% fracture displacement, studies have shown no difference in outcome between surgical and non-surgical treatment.[21]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential for medial elbow pain remains narrow, given its specific anatomical location. Important diagnoses to rule out are UCL tear, medial epicondylopathy, ulnar neuropathy, or local muscular injury. Partial or full-thickness UCL tear presents similar signs and symptoms to MEA, but the patient is usually older than 15 years old.[4][16] Medial epicondylopathies can also present similarly to MEA but typically affect skeletal maturity and are distinguished radiographically.[22] Ulnar neuropathy should be suspected if there is associated paresthesia in the ulnar nerve distribution.[23] Injury to the flexor-pronator muscle group can present with muscle weakness and elbow pain that is aggravated by wrist flexion.[8] Valgus extension overload syndrome can also occur in athletes who engage in overhead throwing. Still, the pain is located at the posteromedial elbow, worse at the end of a throw, and is associated with elbow locking and crepitus.[10] As with all musculoskeletal complaints, the clinician must evaluate the muscle, tendon, ligaments, and nerves for injury and should evaluate the entire extremity.

Prognosis

The prognosis of MEA is generally excellent, with most cases resolving with armrest or when the apophysis closes.[7] One-third of athletes return to their sport.[19] However, recurrence of symptoms is common.[20] In a small number of cases, the apophysis does not fuse and can be complicated by residual ossicles after skeletal maturity, which may sometimes lead to persistent pain.[7] Nonunion and avulsion fractures are more likely in athletes who do not take appropriate rest and rehabilitation measures.[2]

Complications

MEA complications can include the common complication of medial epicondyle avulsion fracture and the less common complications of entrapment of the avulsed bone in the elbow joint space, ulnar nerve entrapment, residual ossicles, and persistent pain. Nonunion of an avulsed epicondyle can result in residual bone remaining in the joint space, causing locking of the joint, persistent pain, or entrapment of the ulnar nerve. Each of these complications is an indication for evaluation for surgical management.[12] After skeletal maturation, some athletes with resolved MEA can still experience persistent pain from residual ossicles. Resection of the ossicles or tubercleplasty may improve symptoms.[7]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Prevention of injury is primarily achieved through the avoidance of overuse and providing adequate rest between high-risk activities. Coaching youth on the correct form and biomechanics theoretically may decrease stress on the elbow and decrease injury.[24] Major League Baseball, the USA Baseball Medical and Safety Advisory Committee, and others have established recommendations regarding pitch counts and rest periods between games and seasons for young players to reduce the incidence of overuse elbow injuries associated with throwing.[25] These recommendations have been further validated by demonstrating a positive correlation between adherence to pitching guidelines and a reduction in youth athlete elbow injuries.[26] However, a 2012 survey found that only 73% of youth baseball coaches followed pitching guidelines.[27] Unfortunately, the most talented and heavily played athletes are the ones who face the greatest risk of overuse injuries. Parents, athletes, and coaches may hesitate to temporarily stop participating in sports for adequate rest due to the value they bring to the team.[8] Health professionals can positively impact their patients’ care and improve adherence to rest regimens by providing necessary education to coaches, parents, and athletes.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Prevention of MEA requires intentional adherence to pitching guidelines by athletes, parents, and coaches, and placing the athlete’s health above performance in any particular game or showcase. Athletes are often initially evaluated by their primary care physician, athletic trainer, or coach. The evaluation and treatment of MEA requires an interprofessional healthcare team. A primary care physician should evaluate any athlete with persistent medial elbow pain to determine if radiographic imaging is necessary. The radiologist's role is vital for the accurate interpretation of imaging, determining the degree of epicondylar separation, and assessing the need for referral to orthopedic surgery for operative management. Physical therapists play a crucial role in non-operative management and facilitating a safe return to exercise. The psychological toll of a sports injury can be significant, as many high-level athletes often identify their identity with their sport and their performance. A sports psychologist can help counsel athletes through the uncertainties and pain of having a sports injury.[18] Overall, for patients affected by MEA, the prognosis is very good for pain-free adulthood if the patient is accurately diagnosed and appropriately treated with a multi-disciplinary healthcare team.

Review Questions

• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
• Click here for a simplified version.
• Comment on this article.

References

1.

Chen FS, Diaz VA, Loebenberg M, Rosen JE. Shoulder and elbow injuries in the skeletally immature athlete. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 May-Jun;13(3):172-85. [PubMed: 15938606]

2.

Delgado J, Jaramillo D, Chauvin NA. Imaging the Injured Pediatric Athlete: Upper Extremity. Radiographics. 2016 Oct;36(6):1672-1687. [PubMed: 27726752]

3.

Fornalski S, Gupta R, Lee TQ. Anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow joint. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2003 Dec;7(4):168-78. [PubMed: 16518218]

4.

Mariscalco MW, Saluan P. Upper extremity injuries in the adolescent athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011 Mar;19(1):17-26. [PubMed: 21293234]

5.

Patel RM, Lynch TS, Amin NH, Calabrese G, Gryzlo SM, Schickendantz MS. The thrower's elbow. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014 Jul;45(3):355-76. [PubMed: 24975763]

6.

Norton R, Honstad C, Joshi R, Silvis M, Chinchilli V, Dhawan A. Risk Factors for Elbow and Shoulder Injuries in Adolescent Baseball Players: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):982-990. [PubMed: 29630388]

7.

DiFiori JP, Benjamin HJ, Brenner J, Gregory A, Jayanthi N, Landry GL, Luke A. Overuse injuries and burnout in youth sports: a position statement from the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine. Clin J Sport Med. 2014 Jan;24(1):3-20. [PubMed: 24366013]

8.

Gregory B, Nyland J. Medial elbow injury in young throwing athletes. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013 Apr;3(2):91-100. [PMC free article: PMC3711707] [PubMed: 23888291]

9.

Otoshi K, Kikuchi S, Kato K, Sato R, Igari T, Kaga T, Konno S. Age-Specific Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Humeral Medial Epicondyle Apophysitis and Osteochondritis Dissecans: Ultrasonographic Assessment of 4249 Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 May;5(5):2325967117707703. [PMC free article: PMC5446105] [PubMed: 28589162]

10.

DeFroda S, McGlone P, Levins J, O'Donnell R, Cruz AI, Kriz PK. Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in the Adolescent Throwing Athlete. R I Med J (2013). 2020 Sep 01;103(7):21-29. [PubMed: 32872686]

11.

Hang DW, Chao CM, Hang YS. A clinical and roentgenographic study of Little League elbow. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;32(1):79-84. [PubMed: 14754727]

12.

Nguyen JC, Sheehan SE, Davis KW, Gill KG. Sports and the Growing Musculoskeletal System: Sports Imaging Series. Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):25-42. [PubMed: 28628411]

13.

O'Driscoll SW, Lawton RL, Smith AM. The "moving valgus stress test" for medial collateral ligament tears of the elbow. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):231-9. [PubMed: 15701609]

14.

Cruz AI, Steere JT, Lawrence JT. Medial Epicondyle Fractures in the Pediatric Overhead Athlete. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Jun;36 Suppl 1:S56-62. [PubMed: 27100037]

15.

Dwek JR, Chung CB. A systematic method for evaluation of pediatric sports injuries of the elbow. Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Mar;43 Suppl 1:S120-8. [PubMed: 23478927]

16.

Lee YY, Yang TH, Huang CC, Huang YC, Chen PC, Hsu CH, Wang LY, Chou WY. Ultrasonography has high positive predictive value for medial epicondyle lesions among adolescent baseball players. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Oct;27(10):3261-3268. [PubMed: 30284010]

17.

Onay T, Aydemir AN, Okay E, Topkar OM, Gulabi D, Erol B. Does computerized tomography change the treatment decision in pediatric medial epicondyle fractures? Acta Orthop Belg. 2019 Mar;85(1):79-85. [PubMed: 31023203]

18.

Padaki AS, Ahmad CS. Can We Reduce the Epidemic of Elbow Injuries in Youth Throwers? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 May;48(5):354-357. [PubMed: 29712546]

19.

Makhni EC, Jegede KA, Ahmad CS. Pediatric elbow injuries in athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014 Sep;22(3):e16-24. [PubMed: 25077752]

20.

Achar S, Yamanaka J. Apophysitis and Osteochondrosis: Common Causes of Pain in Growing Bones. Am Fam Physician. 2019 May 15;99(10):610-618. [PubMed: 31083875]

21.

Axibal DP, Carry P, Skelton A, Mayer SW. No Difference in Return to Sport and Other Outcomes Between Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Medial Epicondyle Fractures in Pediatric Upper-Extremity Athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Nov;30(6):e214-e218. [PMC free article: PMC6443487] [PubMed: 30277893]

22.

Amin NH, Kumar NS, Schickendantz MS. Medial epicondylitis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Jun;23(6):348-55. [PubMed: 26001427]

23.

Dy CJ, Mackinnon SE. Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Jun;9(2):178-84. [PMC free article: PMC4896870] [PubMed: 27080868]

24.

Davis JT, Limpisvasti O, Fluhme D, Mohr KJ, Yocum LA, Elattrache NS, Jobe FW. The effect of pitching biomechanics on the upper extremity in youth and adolescent baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Aug;37(8):1484-91. [PubMed: 19633301]

25.

Kerut EK, Kerut DG, Fleisig GS, Andrews JR. Prevention of arm injury in youth baseball pitchers. J La State Med Soc. 2008 Mar-Apr;160(2):95-8. [PubMed: 18681352]

26.

Zabawa L, Alland JA. Association Between Parental Understanding of Pitch Smart Guidelines and Youth Baseball Player Injuries. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 May;7(5):2325967119846314. [PMC free article: PMC6537076] [PubMed: 31205967]

27.

Fazarale JJ, Magnussen RA, Pedroza AD, Kaeding CC, Best TM, Classie J. Knowledge of and compliance with pitch count recommendations: a survey of youth baseball coaches. Sports Health. 2012 May;4(3):202-4. [PMC free article: PMC3435927] [PubMed: 23016087]

Disclosure: Christopher Hodge declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Jeremy Schroeder declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.