Continuing Education Activity

Clinicians often face a gap in assessing driving safety in older adults with neurocognitive disorders due to the lack of evidence-based tests and discomfort with the topic. This issue is compounded by a reluctance to address driving concerns, whether from clinicians, patients, or caregivers. Effective evaluation is crucial as these patients are at higher risk of accidents. In addition, improved patient education and counseling are necessary, supported by an interprofessional healthcare team, to address driving safety concerns and maintain independence while mitigating risks. Enhancing awareness and communication about driving fitness can help bridge this practice gap.

Objectives:

• Identify key signs of cognitive decline and driving impairment in older adults to ensure timely evaluation and intervention.
• Implement a multidisciplinary approach to driving evaluations, involving healthcare professionals, social workers, and family caregivers.
• Select appropriate tools and tests to evaluate driving fitness in older adults and ensure their effective use in clinical practice.
• Collaborate with an interprofessional healthcare team to develop a personalized plan for managing driving safety in older adults and transitioning them to alternative transportation options.

Introduction

Cognitive decline can be described as a gradual or sudden loss of thinking abilities such as learning, paying attention and remembering past events/details.This is more commonly seen in the older adults with dementia.[1] When taking care of patients with dementia (PWD), it is important to assess the patient’s fitness to drive. Patients with dementia have a 2-8x increased risk of motor vehicle accidents compared to similarly aged drivers without dementia, yet many are never counseled on driving safety.[2]

Driving safety assessment is a sensitive discussion that is often delayed or forgone altogether because of physician reluctance, patient refusal, or caretaker preference. Physicians often are not formally trained on how to conduct these conversations and seldom do not conduct the assessment. Driving is integral to a patient’s independence, so discussions of driving fitness may be met with emotional resistance, and patients may not recognize or admit their deficits.[3] 

The true extent of driving impairment may be minimized by caretakers who either do not want to admit the progression of their loved one’s disease or do not want to take on additional driving responsibilities.[4] Despite these barriers, driver safety assessment is an important public health and medicolegal issue and should be familiar to all healthcare professionals. See Driving Screening Flowchart below:

Issues of Concern

Driving a vehicle is a complex task that involves several different domains including cognitive, visual and motor skills. These can present as age-related changes, even in older adults with health aging[5]. These changes include the decline in neuromuscular and musculoskeletal function, with reduced muscle strength and decreased coordination and motor control[6].

Unlike other activities of daily living, driving is unpredictable and requires attention to many simultaneous audiovisual inputs.[7] Drivers must be able to understand new traffic patterns and react quickly to their surroundings. They must also be able to process the symbols on their dashboard and the buttons to operate the car while also paying attention to the signage on the road. Older adult drivers, even without dementia, may find this multitasking difficult, as many already have chronic medical illnesses, physical disabilities, and the compounded effects of polypharmacy.[4] The added complication of cognitive impairment makes driving an even far greater challenge for patients with dementia. Analyses of errors made by drivers with dementia show significant difficulties with turning, lane positioning, and identifying traffic signs. Drivers with dementia are more likely to get lost or drive below the speed limit, which may result in road traffic accidents.[8] 

Regardless of the type, neurocognitive disorders can cause deficits in attention, insight, and judgment. Patients have greater difficulty integrating information to make complex executive decisions.[7] Deficits such as apraxia may impair their ability to execute tasks critical to driving, such as timely application of the brakes or steering away from obstructions on the road. Frontotemporal dementia may lead to an increase in aggressive, risk-taking driving.[8] Patients with visuospatial deficits may miscalculate distances or have difficulties with parking in small spaces. In addition to these functional cognitive deficiencies, patients with dementia often have neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as anxiety, paranoia, and lack of insight into their illness.[9] Their motor reactivity may be slower, and their coordination and balance may also be impaired.[10]  It is also noted that low education level and reduced cognition level are conditions that were predictors for loss of vehicular driving license[11].

Clinical Significance

Dementia is a progressive illness, and not all patients with dementia experience the same deficits. In fact, many patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia still have the ability to operate a vehicle safely. However, an analysis of this population of patients with a clinical dementia rating scale of 0.5-1.0 showed on-road testing failure in 13% of the participants.[8] This suggests that even patients who report no problems with driving may have subtle impairment of driving skills and could benefit from driving fitness assessments. Early communication about anticipated driving difficulties allows the patient and family to be more cognizant of functional decline. Other symptoms that suggest a patient needs a driving assessment include changes in driving habits, preferring to take familiar roads only, minor vehicle accidents, and parking citations.[3] Often, collateral information from caretakers plays a key role in determining any concerns that the patient may not have noticed.

Assessing fitness to drive requires a multifactorial approach and a thorough cognitive assessment, and multiple objective scales and tests are used for evaluation.[3] Many organizations, such as the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Neurology, have proposed guidelines for evaluating driving safety, and these parameters often involve specific screening variables. 

The most important factor is the severity of dementia, typically assessed with the Clinical Dementia Rating(CDR) scale. Patients with CDR >1.0 should be assessed for driving safety, as this is the only screening test that carries level A evidence of utility.[12][13][14] Forty-five percent of drivers with CDR 0.5 to 1.0 passed on-road driving tests but showed a cognitive decline in function in 6 months. As such, it is recommended to re-evaluate these patients with mild dementia every 3 to 6 months.[8][15]

A low cognitive testing performance often correlates with a patient’s inability to pass roadside driving tests. However, there is no clear pattern of regression. The 2010 AAN practice parameter for evaluating and managing driving risk in dementia suggested that patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≤ of 24 are at increased risk for unsafe driving.[8] Other studies using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) were less consistent, some suggesting a cutoff of MoCA score ≤ 25. In contrast, larger studies could only specify MoCA ≤ 18 as a cutoff for patients likely to fail on-the-road testing.[16][17] A more recent systematic review did not find a consistent relationship between cognitive testing and driving performance.[7] Testing patients with a validated composite battery of neuropsychological tests may provide an overview of the patient’s function level but may not be clearly predictive of driving ability.[18] 

A caregiver’s impression of the patient’s driving safety has proven to be more indicative of driving impairment, and it is often more accurate than the patient’s own individual self-assessment.[15] Corroborating driving history with the caregiver carries Level B evidence to support its utilization. Other professional assessments, such as occupational therapy evaluations, may prove beneficial, though these assessments cannot predict how long a patient will maintain that assessed driving function level.[4] Driving rehabilitation therapists are trained to complete a multi-hour assessment with on-the-road testing that can provide information on the technical skills.[4] Some state agencies and insurance companies provide online algorithms and required driving tests to assess how well a patient operates a vehicle.[4][15] There may also be state-specific mandated reporting laws, so being familiar with each state’s regulations is important.  

Triaging patients with these screening tests is important in guiding clinical recommendations.[17] Driving impairment is prevalent and is likely underreported among patients with dementia, so patients and families should be counseled on driving safety early in the disease course.[3] Clinical symptoms, objective on-the-road testing, and caregiver assessments should help guide the decision towards driving retirement. This is a dynamic assessment, as patients with neurocognitive disorders may need frequent re-evaluation with disease progression.[8]

Other Issues

The relative advantages and disadvantages of driving assessments based on road tests, simulations, or naturalistic data remain unclear. Further research is needed to identify predictors of higher risk for motor vehicle crashes.[19]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Given the high emotional stakes with discussing and determining driving privileges, it is better to begin this discussion early in the course of dementia before overt impairment is noted.[4] This allows patients to anticipate the impact of driving restrictions while still having insight without immediately taking away their sense of control. Maintaining control is a key factor in a patient’s self esteem, and loss of control in everyday tasks is often associated with psychological decline.[9] Instead, the clinician and caregivers should focus the discussion on transitioning to safe transport and becoming a safe passenger.[4] Avoiding the language of “withdraw,” “take away,” and “loss of privilege” can aid in effective patient communication without making the patient feel victimized or at fault. 

After providing the driving fitness assessment, patients and families may need help complying with this new transition at home. Clinicians may suggest social resources or safer public transportation options.[17] Patients may continue to attempt driving despite their families’ warnings, and at this point, the patient's safety must be prioritized. Caregivers should be advised to avoid discussions that remind the patient of what they can no longer do. In some cases, families may need to park the car away from easy access or hide the car keys. Directly confronting the patient with repeated threats will likely increase a patient’s confusion and compromise safety at home. Instead, families should be encouraged to de-escalate by changing the topic of discussion discussion topic or distracting the patient until they are less focused on driving.[4] Patients and families may benefit from participating in driving cessation groups in the community to aid the transition.

In summary, patients with dementia are at increased risk of driving impairment and their fitness to drive should be evaluated in all patients with neurocognitive disorders. There is no single objective scale or test to determine driving fitness, so this decision should involve a multidisciplinary assessment. It is prudent to begin screening for driving impairment as soon as the clinician obtains a history of driving accidents/citations or significant changes in driving patterns. This should be followed with a thorough evaluation of the patient’s medications and physical exam. If patients have high-risk features of cognitive decline on screening, they should be further evaluated with neuropsychological testing and the clinical dementia severity scale (Level 1A evidence).

Due to the complexity of CDR scoring, clinicians in a busy practice may consider utilizing the MMSE or MoCA as an alternative. They should consider the lack of Level 1A evidence supporting their use in assessing driving ability. The next step in any safety assessment can include referring the patient to a certified occupational therapist or a driving rehabilitation specialist to assess on-the-road driving abilities. Using this stepwise diagnostic approach may provide a comprehensive evaluation of the patient and driving safety. After a patient has been deemed unfit to drive, it is the clinician’s responsibility to share this information sensitively with the older adult and ensure that the patients and caregivers are well-supported in this important transition. Additionally it is important that this information has also been well documented so other team members involved in the patients care are informed and aware.

Review Questions

• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
• Comment on this article.

References

1.

Gómez-Gómez ME, Zapico SC. Frailty, Cognitive Decline, Neurodegenerative Diseases and Nutrition Interventions. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 11;20(11) [PMC free article: PMC6600148] [PubMed: 31212645]

2.

Dubinsky RM, Stein AC, Lyons K. Practice parameter: risk of driving and Alzheimer's disease (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]: report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000 Jun 27;54(12):2205-11. [PubMed: 10881240]

3.

Lee L, Molnar F. Driving and dementia: Efficient approach to driving safety concerns in family practice. Can Fam Physician. 2017 Jan;63(1):27-31. [PMC free article: PMC5257216] [PubMed: 28115437]

4.

Hamdy RC, Kinser A, Kendall-Wilson T, Depelteau A, Whalen K, Culp J. Driving and Patients With Dementia. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018 Jan-Dec;4:2333721418777085. [PMC free article: PMC5985540] [PubMed: 29900187]

5.

Karthaus M, Falkenstein M. Functional Changes and Driving Performance in Older Drivers: Assessment and Interventions. Geriatrics (Basel). 2016 May 20;1(2) [PMC free article: PMC6371115] [PubMed: 31022806]

6.

Alonso AC, Peterson MD, Busse AL, Jacob-Filho W, Borges MTA, Serra MM, Luna NMS, Marchetti PH, Greve JMDA. Muscle strength, postural balance, and cognition are associated with braking time during driving in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2016 Dec 01;85:13-17. [PubMed: 27616163]

7.

Bennett JM, Chekaluk E, Batchelor J. Cognitive Tests and Determining Fitness to Drive in Dementia: A Systematic Review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Sep;64(9):1904-17. [PubMed: 27253511]

8.

Toepper M, Falkenstein M. Driving Fitness in Different Forms of Dementia: An Update. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2186-2192. [PubMed: 31386780]

9.

Radue R, Walaszek A, Asthana S. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:437-454. [PubMed: 31753148]

10.

Cohen JA, Verghese J. Gait and dementia. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:419-427. [PubMed: 31753146]

11.

Lenardt MH, Lourenço TM, Betiolli SE, Binotto MA, Sétlik CM, Barbiero MMA. Handgrip strength in older adults and driving aptitude. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022;76(1):e20210729. [PMC free article: PMC9730861] [PubMed: 36449971]

12.

Brown LB, Ott BR, Papandonatos GD, Sui Y, Ready RE, Morris JC. Prediction of on-road driving performance in patients with early Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jan;53(1):94-8. [PMC free article: PMC3292197] [PubMed: 15667383]

13.

Duchek JM, Carr DB, Hunt L, Roe CM, Xiong C, Shah K, Morris JC. Longitudinal driving performance in early-stage dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Oct;51(10):1342-7. [PubMed: 14511152]

14.

Grace J, Amick MM, D'Abreu A, Festa EK, Heindel WC, Ott BR. Neuropsychological deficits associated with driving performance in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005 Oct;11(6):766-75. [PMC free article: PMC3292203] [PubMed: 16248912]

15.

Iverson DJ, Gronseth GS, Reger MA, Classen S, Dubinsky RM, Rizzo M., Quality Standards Subcomittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter update: evaluation and management of driving risk in dementia: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2010 Apr 20;74(16):1316-24. [PMC free article: PMC2860481] [PubMed: 20385882]

16.

Hollis AM, Duncanson H, Kapust LR, Xi PM, O'Connor MG. Validity of the mini-mental state examination and the montreal cognitive assessment in the prediction of driving test outcome. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 May;63(5):988-92. [PubMed: 25940275]

17.

Hill LJN, Pignolo RJ, Tung EE. Assessing and Counseling the Older Driver: A Concise Review for the Generalist Clinician. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Aug;94(8):1582-1588. [PubMed: 31378232]

18.

Esser P, Dent S, Jones C, Sheridan BJ, Bradley A, Wade DT, Dawes H. Utility of the MOCA as a cognitive predictor for fitness to drive. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 May;87(5):567-8. [PubMed: 25986364]

19.

Daffner KR, O'Connor M. It Is Time for Medicare to Cover Driving Safety Assessments. JAMA Neurol. 2024 Oct 01;81(10):1021-1022. [PubMed: 39133469]

Disclosure: Susan McNamara declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Jagmohan Jandu declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Arvindselvan Mohanaselvan declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Aashrai Gudlavalleti declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.