U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2024.

Cover of GeneReviews®

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Show details

CHD4 Neurodevelopmental Disorder

Synonyms: Sifrim-Hitz-Weiss Syndrome, SIHIWES

, MD and , MD.

Author Information and Affiliations

Initial Posting: .

Estimated reading time: 17 minutes


Clinical characteristics.

CHD4 neurodevelopmental disorder (CHD4-NDD) is associated with developmental delay, speech delay, and usually mild-to-moderate intellectual disability. Variability between individuals with CHD4-NDD is significant, and a few have normal intelligence. Other manifestations can include brain anomalies, heart defects, and skeletal abnormalities; less common features are hypogonadism in males, hearing impairment, and ophthalmic abnormalities. Most affected individuals have mild nonspecific dysmorphic facial features with or without macrocephaly.


The diagnosis of CHD4-NDD is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in CHD4 identified by molecular genetic testing.


Treatment of manifestations: Developmental delay / intellectual disability, cervical spine instability and risk of spinal cord compression, refractive errors and strabismus, hearing impairment, congenital heart defects, behavioral issues, growth delay, hypogonadism in males, and renal anomalies are managed per standard care.

Surveillance: Follow up of the common manifestations at each clinic visit.

Agents/circumstances to avoid: Activities that involve rapid neck motion and/or possible trauma to the head and neck region (e.g., contact sports or thrill rides at amusement parks) because of the possible increased risk for cervical spine instability and spinal cord compression.

Genetic counseling.

CHD4-NDD is an autosomal dominant disorder typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant. If the CHD4 pathogenic variant identified in the proband is not identified in either parent, the risk to sibs is low (~1%) but greater than that of the general population because of the possibility of parental germline mosaicism. Once the CHD4 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.


Formal diagnostic criteria for CHD4 neurodevelopmental disorder (CHD4-NDD) have not been established.

Suggestive Findings

CHD4-NDD should be considered in individuals with the following clinical and brain MRI findings.

Clinical findings. Developmental delay or mild-to-moderate intellectual disability AND any of the following features presenting in infancy or childhood:

  • Generalized hypotonia of infancy
  • Macrocephaly or relative macrocephaly
  • Congenital heart defects (septal defects, conotruncal anomalies, and valvular abnormalities)
  • Skeletal and limb anomalies (vertebral fusion, carpal/tarsal coalition, syndactyly, polydactyly)
  • Hypogonadism in males (cryptorchidism and/or microphallus)
  • Ophthalmologic abnormalities (strabismus, hypermetropia, astigmatism)
  • Hearing impairment (conductive and/or sensorineural)
  • Moyamoya disease with congenital or infantile stroke

Brain MRI findings. Brain anomalies including the following (detected in 92% [22/24] of affected individuals):

  • Mild-to-moderate ventriculomegaly (in 41%)
  • Chiari 1 malformation (29%)
  • Hydrocephalus requiring shunting (18%)
  • Other. Thin corpus callosum and syringomyelia

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of CHD4-NDD is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in CHD4 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Note: Identification of a heterozygous CHD4 variant of uncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis of this disorder.

Molecular genetic testing in any child with developmental delay or an older individual with intellectual disability typically begins with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), which uses oligonucleotide or SNP arrays to detect genome-wide large deletions/duplications that cannot be detected by sequence analysis.

If CMA is not diagnostic, the next step is typically either a multigene panel or exome sequencing. Note: Single-gene testing (sequence analysis of CHD4, followed by gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis) is rarely useful and typically NOT recommended.

  • An intellectual disability (ID) multigene panel that includes CHD4 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition in a person with a nondiagnostic CMA while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. Of note, given the rarity of CHD4-NDD, some panels for intellectual disability may not include this gene. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
    For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.
  • Comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene is likely involved. Exome sequencing is most commonly used and yields results similar to an intellectual disability multigene panel with the additional advantage that exome sequencing includes genes recently identified as causing ID, whereas some multigene panels may not. If exome sequencing is not diagnostic, exome array (when clinically available) may be considered to detect (multi)exon deletions or duplications that cannot be detected by exome sequencing. Note: To date such variants have not been identified as a cause of CHD4-NDD.
    Genome sequencing is also possible.
    For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in CHD4 Neurodevelopmental Disorder

Gene 1MethodProportion of Probands with a Pathogenic Variant 2 Detectable by Method 3
CHD4 Sequence analysis 4100%
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5None

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in this gene.


Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.


Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

CHD4 neurodevelopmental disorder (CHD4-NDD) is associated with developmental delay, speech delay, and usually mild-to-moderate intellectual disability. Variability among individuals with CHD4-NDD is significant, and some have normal intelligence. Other manifestations can include brain anomalies, heart defects, and skeletal abnormalities; less common features are hypogonadism in males, hearing impairment, and ophthalmic abnormalities. Most affected individuals have mild nonspecific dysmorphic facial features with or without macrocephaly.

To date, 33 individuals have been identified with a heterozygous CHD4 pathogenic missense variant or in-frame insertion/deletion [Sifrim et al 2016, Weiss et al 2016, Weiss et al 2020, and unpublished data]. The following description of CHD4-NDD phenotypic features is based on these reports.

Table 2.

Select Features of CHD4 Neurodevelopmental Disorder

Feature% of Persons with FeatureComment
Speech delay94% (29/31)
Motor delay91% (29/32)
Intellectual disability83% (19/23)Mostly mild-to-moderate ID
Ophthalmologic abnormalities74% (14/19)
Congenital heart defect72% (21/29)
Hypotonia71% (17/24)
Hearing impairment58% (11/19)
Cryptorchidism52% (11/21)
Macrocephaly46% (13/28)>90th %ile
Skeletal/limb anomalies42% (14/33)
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism38% (8/21)Reported in males only
Short stature31% (9/29)Some w/growth hormone deficiency
Hydrocephalus requiring shunting18% (6/33)

Developmental delay (DD) and intellectual disability (ID). The majority of individuals have developmental delay. Speech delay is common, but the majority communicate verbally using short sentences; absence of speech has not been reported. A cognitive assessment identified intellectual disability in the mild-to-moderate range in 82%; in four individuals IQ score was in the low normal or borderline range.

The average age of independent ambulation is 30 months. Three children achieved independent ambulation after age five years.

Other neurodevelopmental features include hypotonia during infancy and early childhood. While some infants have feeding difficulties, few require nasogastric tube feeding or gastrostomy.

Hydrocephalus requiring shunting has been associated with intellectual disability ranging from mild to moderate.

Behavioral or psychiatric problems are not a frequent finding. Autism spectrum disorder was reported in three individuals and attention-deficit disorder, impulsivity, and anxiety were reported in three.

Growth. The majority are born after an uneventful pregnancy with an average birth weight and head circumference. Some individuals develop macrocephaly; a few have microcephaly. Short stature is seen in 30%. Seven of 30 individuals had obesity at late childhood or adulthood. Growth hormone deficiency was reported in four individuals, all of whom were treated with growth hormone with an overall good response.

Congenital heart defects include septal defects, conotruncal anomalies, and valve anomalies. To date the following malformations (by frequency) have been reported: atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, pulmonary stenosis, patent ductus arteriosus, tetralogy of Fallot, mitral valve anomalies, Ebstein anomaly, and truncus arteriosus.

Skeletal and limb anomalies. The most common are hand or foot syndactyly, polydactyly, scoliosis (acquired), vertebral anomalies (mainly cervical fusions), and tarsal or carpal coalition. In those with cervical vertebral anomalies, the risk for cervical instability is increased.

Because some individuals with CHD4-NDD did not have a skeletal survey, the true frequency of bone fusions and other skeletal anomalies could be higher.

Hypogonadism is common in males. When performed, the hormonal profile was consistent with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

To date, there are no reports of hypogonadism or infertility in females; however, the majority of individuals reported to date are children.

Sensory impairment. Of those with hearing impairment, the majority of affected individuals have sensorineural hearing loss; a few have conductive or mixed hearing impairment. Recurrent otitis media is not common.

Significant vision impairment has not been reported, but ophthalmic anomalies (by frequency) include: strabismus, astigmatism, hypermetropia, glaucoma, small optic nerves, iris coloboma, and myopia.

Moyamoya disease. Of the three children who had a stroke after birth or during infancy, two were diagnosed with moyamoya disease. A link between CHD4 variants and moyamoya disease has also been described by Pinard et al [2020].

Facial features. Mild nonspecific dysmorphic features observed in some individuals include widely spaced eyes, periorbital fullness, a short nose, and a square face.

Cancer risk. Cancer has not been reported in individuals with CHD4-NDD.

Prognosis. It is unknown whether life span in CHD4-NDD is abnormal. One individual is alive at age 30 years [Weiss et al 2020], demonstrating that survival into adulthood is possible. However, severe congenital abnormalities may shorten the life span. Since many adults with disabilities have not undergone advanced genetic testing, it is likely that adults with CHD4-NDD are underrecognized and underreported.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

The majority of CHD4 variants are missense substitutions that fall in the ATPase / C terminal helicase domain (amino acids 724-1281). Data to date are insufficient to support genotype-phenotype correlations.


Because the vast majority of individuals with CHD4-NDD reported to date have de novo variants, it is currently thought the penetrance is close to 100%.


CHD4-NDD is rare. The authors are aware of approximately 50 affected individuals worldwide.

Differential Diagnosis

Because the phenotypic features associated with CHD4 neurodevelopmental disorder are not sufficient to diagnose this condition, all disorders with intellectual disability without other distinctive findings should be considered in the differential diagnosis. See OMIM Autosomal Dominant, Autosomal Recessive, Nonsyndromic X-Linked, and Syndromic X-Linked Intellectual Developmental Disorder Phenotypic Series.


Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with CHD4 neurodevelopmental disorder (CHD4-NDD), the evaluations summarized in Table 3 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 3.

Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with CHD4 Neurodevelopmental Disorder

Constitutional Measurement of weight, height, head circumferenceBaseline assessment, given ↑ risk for hydrocephalus that may require shunting
Neurologic Neurologic evalAssess for:
  • Evidence of congenital or infantile stroke;
  • Signs of ↑ intracranial pressure / herniation / cord compression.
  • Brain & cervical spine MRI for detection of hydrocephalus / Chiari 1/ syringomyelia;
  • MRA for persons w/suspected stroke or infants undergoing brain imaging.
Development Developmental assessment
  • To incl motor, adaptive, cognitive, & speech/language eval
  • Eval for early intervention / special education
Neuropsychiatric evalPersons age >12 mos: if suspected, screen for behavior concerns incl sleep disturbances, ADHD, anxiety, &/or traits suggestive of ASD
Musculoskeletal Orthopedics / physical medicine & rehab / PT/OT evalAssess:
  • For skeletal & limb anomalies;
  • Gross motor & fine motor skills;
  • Mobility, ADLs, & need for adaptive devices;
  • Need for PT (to improve gross motor skills) &/or OT (to improve fine motor skills).
  • Flexion-extension radiographs of lateral cervical spine
  • Flexion-extension MRI if instability & compression seen on radiographs or interpretation is limited (e.g., in young persons w/delayed ossification of cervical vertebral bodies)
Evaluate for cervical instability & risk of spinal cord compression.
Eyes Ophthalmologic evalTo assess for refractive error, strabismus, glaucoma, & coloboma
Hearing Audiologic evalTo assess for conductive &/or sensorineural hearing loss
Cardiovascular For congenital heart defectsEchocardiogram for detection of conotruncal & valve anomalies
Endocrine HypogonadismMales:
  • Assess for cryptorchidism & microphallus.
  • Refer to endocrinologist & obtain FSH/LH & testosterone levels in 1st yr of life & in puberty.
Females: consider endocrinology assessment during or after puberty.
Growth hormone deficiencyAll persons w/short stature: consider growth hormone testing.
Renal Renal US examAssess for vesicoureteral reflux.
By genetics professionals 1To inform affected persons & families re nature, MOI, & implications of CHD4-NDD to facilitate medical & personal decision making
Family support/
Assess need for:

ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ADL = activity of daily living; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone; LH = luteinizing hormone; MOI = mode of inheritance; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy; US = ultrasound


Medical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, or certified advanced genetic nurse

Treatment of Manifestations

Table 4.

Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with CHD4 Neurodevelopmental Disorder

Developmental delay /
Intellectual disability
See Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues.
Hydrocephalus / Chiari 1 malformation / Syringomyelia Standard treatment(s) per neurosurgeon
Cervical spine instability Surgical management (C1-C2 fixation or other)
Skeletal & limb anomalies Orthopedics / physical medicine & rehab / PT/OT
Refractive error &/or strabismus Standard treatment(s) per ophthalmologist
Hearing Hearing aids may be helpful; per otolaryngologist.Community hearing services through early intervention or school district if hearing loss warrants
Cardiac anomalies Standard treatment per cardiologist/cardiac surgeon
Endocrine For cryptorchidism/microphallus:
standard treatment per endocrinologist
For growth hormone deficiency:
standard treatment per endocrinologist
No data exists re safety of growth hormone treatment in CHD4-NDD.
  • Ensure appropriate social work involvement to connect families w/local resources, respite, & support.
  • Coordinate care to manage multiple subspecialty appointments, equipment, medications, & supplies.
Consider involvement in adaptive sports or Special Olympics.

OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy

Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues

The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.

Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy as well as infant mental health services, special educators, and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to target individual therapy needs.

Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, social, or cognitive delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; for children too medically unstable to attend, home-based services are provided.

All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies (US) and to support parents in maximizing quality of life. Some issues to consider:

  • IEP services:
    • An IEP provides specially designed instruction and related services to children who qualify.
    • IEP services will be reviewed annually to determine whether any changes are needed.
    • As required by special education law, children should be in the least restrictive environment feasible at school and included in general education as much as possible and when appropriate.
    • Vision and hearing consultants should be a part of the child's IEP team to support access to academic material.
    • PT, OT, and speech services will be provided in the IEP to the extent that the need affects the child's access to academic material. Beyond that, private supportive therapies based on the affected individual's needs may be considered. Specific recommendations regarding type of therapy can be made by a developmental pediatrician.
    • As a child enters the teen years, a transition plan should be discussed and incorporated in the IEP. For those receiving IEP services, the public school district is required to provide services until age 21.
  • A 504 plan (Section 504: a US federal statute that prohibits discrimination based on disability) can be considered for those who require accommodations or modifications such as front-of-class seating, assistive technology devices, classroom scribes, extra time between classes, modified assignments, and enlarged text.
  • Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) enrollment is recommended. DDA is a US public agency that provides services and support to qualified individuals. Eligibility differs by state but is typically determined by diagnosis and/or associated cognitive/adaptive disabilities.
  • Families with limited income and resources may also qualify for supplemental security income (SSI) for their child with a disability.

Motor Dysfunction

Gross motor dysfunction

  • Physical therapy is recommended to maximize mobility and to reduce the risk for later-onset orthopedic complications (e.g., contractures, scoliosis, hip dislocation).
  • Consider use of durable medical equipment and positioning devices as needed (e.g., wheelchairs, walkers, bath chairs, orthotics, adaptive strollers).
  • For muscle tone abnormalities including hypertonia or dystonia, consider involving appropriate specialists to aid in management of baclofen, tizanidine, Botox®, antiparkinsonian medications, or orthopedic procedures.

Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.

Oral motor dysfunction should be assessed at each visit and clinical feeding evaluations and/or radiographic swallowing studies should be obtained for choking/gagging during feeds, poor weight gain, frequent respiratory illnesses, or feeding refusal that is not otherwise explained. Assuming that the child is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy (typically from an occupational or speech therapist) is recommended to help improve coordination or sensory-related feeding issues. Feeds can be thickened or chilled for safety. When feeding dysfunction is severe, an NG-tube or G-tube may be necessary.

Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g., augmentative and alternative communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties. An AAC evaluation can be completed by a speech-language pathologist who has expertise in the area. The evaluation will consider cognitive abilities and sensory impairments to determine the most appropriate form of communication. AAC devices can range from low-tech, such as picture exchange communication, to high-tech, such as voice-generating devices. Contrary to popular belief, AAC devices do not hinder verbal development of speech, but rather support optimal speech and language development.

Social/Behavioral Concerns

Children may qualify for and benefit from interventions used in treatment of autism spectrum disorder, including applied behavior analysis (ABA). ABA therapy is targeted to the individual child's behavioral, social, and adaptive strengths and weaknesses and typically performed one on one with a board-certified behavior analyst.

Consultation with a developmental pediatrician may be helpful in guiding parents through appropriate behavior management strategies or providing prescription medications, such as medication used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, when necessary.

Concerns about serious aggressive or destructive behavior can be addressed by a pediatric psychiatrist.


Table 5.

Recommended Surveillance for Individuals with CHD4 Neurodevelopmental Disorder

Neurologic For infants & young children: monitor head circumference because of ↑ risk of hydrocephalus.At each visit
Consider brain MRI/MRA.If new neurologic manifestations such as seizures & stroke
Assess for new manifestations (e.g., changes in muscle tone, hemiparesis, pyramidal signs, seizures).At each visit
Spine Flexion-extension radiograph; flexion-extension MRI if instability & compression on radiographs or limited interpretation on radiographsPer orthopedist based on clinical findings or planned surgery
Development Monitor developmental progress & educational needs.At each visit
Behavioral assessment for anxiety, attention, & aggressive or self-injurious behaviorEvery 1-3 yrs
Musculoskeletal Physical medicine, OT/PT assessment of mobility, self-help skillsAt each visit
OrthopedistAs needed
Eyes Ophthalmologic assessmentEvery 1-3 yrs
Cardiovascular EchocardiogramFollow up as needed
Endocrine Assessment for hypogonadism when indicated (See Table 4.)At time puberty is expected
Assessment for growth hormone deficiency when indicated (See Table 4.)When indicated
Hearing Hearing testEvery 1-3 yrs
Assess family need for social work support (e.g., palliative/respite care, home nursing, other local resources) & care coordination.At each visit

OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy

Agents/Circumstances to Avoid

Avoid activities that involve rapid neck motion and/or possible trauma to the head and neck region (e.g., contact sports or thrill rides at amusement parks) because of the possible increased risk for cervical spine instability.

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

CHD4 neurodevelopmental disorder (CHD4-NDD) is an autosomal dominant disorder typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant.

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • Almost all probands reported to date with CHD4-NDD have the disorder as a result of a de novo CHD4 pathogenic variant.
  • Presumed parent-to-child transmission was reported in one family in which the parent had features of CHD4-NDD; however, the presumed transmitting parent was not available for molecular genetic testing [Weiss et al 2020].
  • Molecular genetic testing is recommended for the parents of a proband with an apparent de novo pathogenic variant.
  • If the CHD4 pathogenic variant found in the proband cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of either parent, the pathogenic variant most likely occurred de novo in the proband. Another possible explanation is that the proband inherited a pathogenic variant from a parent with germline mosaicism. Although theoretically possible, no instances of germline mosaicism have been reported to date.
  • Theoretically, if the parent is the individual in whom the CHD4 pathogenic variant first occurred, the parent may have somatic mosaicism for the variant and may be mildly/minimally affected.

Sibs of a proband. The risk to the sibs of the proband depends on the genetic status of the proband's parents:

Offspring of a proband. Each child of an individual with CHD4-NDD has a 50% chance of inheriting the CHD4 pathogenic variant.

Other family members. Given that almost all probands with CHD4-NDD reported to date have the disorder as a result of a de novo CHD4 pathogenic variant, the risk to other family members is presumed to be low.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to parents of affected individuals.

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Risk to future pregnancies is presumed to be low as the proband most likely has a de novo CHD4 pathogenic variant. There is, however, a recurrence risk (~1%) to sibs based on the theoretic possibility of parental germline mosaicism [Rahbari et al 2016]. Given this risk, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing may be considered.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.


GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

  • American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)
    Phone: 202-387-1968
  • CDC - Child Development
    Phone: 800-232-4636
  • MedlinePlus
  • Human Disease Genes Website Series - Registry
    This website was created to share and collect information about the clinical features, management and research projects to gather more knowledge and provide better treatment of patients with mutations in the CHD4 gene.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A.

CHD4 Neurodevelopmental Disorder: Genes and Databases

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from HGNC; chromosome locus from OMIM; protein from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click here.

Table B.

OMIM Entries for CHD4 Neurodevelopmental Disorder (View All in OMIM)


Molecular Pathogenesis

CHD4 encodes an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler, a core component of the nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylation (NuRD) complex that is widely expressed and acts mainly, but not exclusively, as a transcriptional repressor. It contains a histone deacetylase (HDAC1/2) and methyl-CpG binding domain protein (MBD2) which bind histone H3 and methylated DNA, respectively. The NuRD complex is involved in multiple processes including stem cell differentiation, embryonic development, cell cycle progression, and DNA damage repair.

Mechanism of disease causation. A dominant-negative mechanism is suspected but not proven. Most reported CHD4 variants are missense variants or in-frame insertions/deletions. In addition, a few individuals with de novo loss-of-function CHD4 variants have been reported; however, the clinical significance of these variants is unclear due to lack of functional studies or a strong phenotypic similarity.


Literature Cited

  • Pinard A, Guey S, Guo D, Cecchi AC, Kharas N, Wallace S, Regalado ES, Hostetler EM, Sharrief AZ, Bergametti F, Kossorotoff M, Hervé D, Kraemer M, Bamshad MJ, Nickerson DA, Smith ER, Tournier-Lasserve E, Milewicz DM. The pleiotropy associated with de novo variants in CHD4, CNOT3, and SETD5 extends to moyamoya angiopathy. Genet Med. 2020;22:427–31. [PMC free article: PMC7673309] [PubMed: 31474762]
  • Rahbari R, Wuster A, Lindsay SJ, Hardwick RJ, Alexandrov LB, Turki SA, Dominiczak A, Morris A, Porteous D, Smith B, Stratton MR, Hurles ME, et al. Timing, rates and spectra of human germline mutation. Nat Genet. 2016;48:126–33. [PMC free article: PMC4731925] [PubMed: 26656846]
  • Sifrim A, Hitz MP, Wilsdon A, Breckpot J, Turki SH, Thienpont B, McRae J, Fitzgerald TW, Singh T, Swaminathan GJ, Prigmore E, Rajan D, Abdul-Khaliq H, Banka S, Bauer UM, Bentham J, Berger F, Bhattacharya S, Bulock FA, Canham N, Colgiu IG, Cosgrove C, Cox H, Daehnert I, Daly A, Danesh J, Fryer A, Gewillig M, Hobson E, Hoff K, Homfray T, Kahlert AK, Ketley A, Kramer HH, Lachlan K, Lampe AK, Louw JJ, Manickara AK, Manase D, McCarthy KP, Metcalfe K, Moore C, Newbury-Ecob R, Omer SO, Ouwehand WH, Park SM, Parker MJ, Pickardt T, Pollard MO, Robert L, Roberts DJ, Sambrook J, Setchfield K, Stiller B, Thornborough C, Toka O, Watkins H, Williams D, Wright M, Mital S, Daubeney PE, Keavney B, Goodship J, Abu-Sulaiman RM, Klaassen S, Wright CF, Firth HV, Barrett JC, Devriendt K, FitzPatrick DR, Brook JD, Hurles ME, et al. Distinct genetic architectures for syndromic and nonsyndromic congenital heart defects identified by exome sequencing. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1060–5. [PMC free article: PMC5988037] [PubMed: 27479907]
  • Weiss K, Lazar HP, Kurolap A, Martinez AF, Paperna T, Cohen L, Smeland MF, Whalen S, Heide S, Keren B, Terhal P, Irving M, Takaku M, Roberts JD, Petrovich RM, Schrier Vergano SA, Kenney A, Hove H, DeChene E, Quinonez SC, Colin E, Ziegler A, Rumple M, Jain M, Monteil D, Roeder ER, Nugent K, van Haeringen A, Gambello M, Santani A, Medne L, Krock B, Skraban CM, Zackai EH, Dubbs HA, Smol T, Ghoumid J, Parker MJ, Wright M, Turnpenny P, Clayton-Smith J, Metcalfe K, Kurumizaka H, Gelb BD, Baris Feldman H, Campeau PM, Muenke M, Wade PA, Lachlan K. The CHD4-related syndrome: a comprehensive investigation of the clinical spectrum, genotype-phenotype correlations, and molecular basis. Genet Med. 2020;22:389–97. [PMC free article: PMC8900827] [PubMed: 31388190]
  • Weiss K, Terhal PA, Cohen L, Bruccoleri M, Irving M, Martinez AF, Rosenfeld JA, Machol K, Yang Y, Liu P, Walkiewicz M, Beuten J, Gomez-Ospina N, Haude K, Fong CT, Enns GM, Bernstein JA, Fan J, Gotway G, Ghorbani M, van Gassen K, Monroe GR, van Haaften G, Basel-Vanagaite L, Yang XJ, Campeau PM, Muenke M, et al. De novo mutations in CHD4, an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler gene, cause an intellectual disability syndrome with distinctive dysmorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:934–41. [PMC free article: PMC5065651] [PubMed: 27616479]

Chapter Notes

Revision History

  • 3 September 2020 (bp) Review posted live
  • 28 January 2020 (kw) Original submission
Copyright © 1993-2024, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (http://www.genereviews.org/) and copyright (© 1993-2024 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: ude.wu@tssamda.

Bookshelf ID: NBK561516PMID: 32881470


Tests in GTR by Gene

Related information

  • OMIM
    Related OMIM records
  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed
  • Gene
    Locus Links

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...