Continuing Education Activity
Strabismus is a common yet complex ocular disorder characterized by misalignment of the eyes; the condition affects patients across all age groups and carries significant visual, functional, and psychosocial consequences. Early recognition and appropriate management are critical, as untreated strabismus may lead to amblyopia, loss of binocular vision, diplopia, abnormal head posture, and reduced quality of life. Despite advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies, variations in evaluation, timing of intervention, and coordination of care continue to challenge clinical practice.
This educational activity provides a comprehensive overview of the etiologies, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and classification of strabismus, with emphasis on practical examination techniques and evidence-based management strategies. Learners can expect detailed discussions on diagnostic approaches, including cover testing, ocular motility assessment, and sensory evaluation, as well as medical, optical, and surgical treatment options tailored to pediatric and adult populations. Special attention is given to prognostic considerations, common pitfalls in diagnosis and management, and long-term follow-up.
Participation in this activity enhances clinical competence by promoting an interprofessional approach involving ophthalmologists, orthoptists, optometrists, pediatricians, neurologists, nurses, and vision therapists. Effective collaboration among healthcare team members improves diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, patient education, and adherence, ultimately leading to better visual outcomes and patient-centered care for individuals with strabismus.
Objectives:
Identify the common etiologies and underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of strabismus in pediatric and adult patients, including congenital, neurologic, refractive, and mechanical causes.
Assess patients with suspected strabismus using appropriate clinical examination techniques, including corneal light reflex testing, cover testing, and evaluation of ocular motility, to determine the type, magnitude, and potential functional impact of the deviation.
Differentiate among available management strategies for strabismus, including refractive correction, amblyopia therapy, orthoptic interventions, and surgical alignment, based on patient age, underlying etiology, and severity of ocular misalignment.
Implement effective interprofessional communication and coordinated care strategies with ophthalmologists, orthoptists, optometrists, pediatricians, and other healthcare professionals to optimize diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal management for patients with strabismus.
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
Introduction
Strabismus, derived from the Greek word meaning "a squinting," refers to misaligned eyes.[1] Strabismic eyes are often referred to as "squinting" or "wandering" eyes. With typical eye alignment, when the head is held in a primary position, both eyes fixate equally on an object. However, in strabismus, 1 or both eyes deviate inwards or outwards and appear to be in nonalignment relative to the direction of the focused object (see Image. Strabismus). This misalignment may be due to refractive error, binocular fusion abnormalities, or neuromuscular anomalies of ocular movements.[2] If diagnosed and treated early, strabismus has an excellent prognosis. Treatment is typically achieved through refractive error correction, orthoptic exercises, occlusive patching, topical medications, and extraocular muscle surgery.
Orthophoria is defined as perfect ocular alignment, even without a stimulus for fusion, while orthotropia refers to the appropriately aligned eyes under binocular conditions. In contrast, heterophoria refers to a latent ocular deviation that remains controlled by fusional mechanisms. Heterotropia represents a manifest deviation detectable on clinical examination, such as with the corneal light reflex test. Manifest strabismus may lead to or coexist with amblyopia, particularly in pediatric patients.[3] Strabismus is classified as infantile when the deviation of the eyes is noted at or before 6 months, and the condition is defined as acquired if the deviation develops after 6 months. Strabismus is further characterized as comitant if the angle of deviation remains the same in different positions of gaze, and the condition is considered incomitant if the deviation varies in size in different positions of gaze.[4]
Strabismic deviations are named according to the direction of ocular misalignment using standardized descriptive prefixes, as summarized in the list below.
"Eso-" refers to a convergent deviation in which the eye turns nasally (toward the nose).
"Exo-" refers to a divergent deviation in which the eye turns temporally (away from the nose).
"Hyper-" refers to a vertical deviation in which the affected eye is positioned higher than the fellow eye.
"Hypo-" refers to a vertical deviation in which the affected eye is positioned lower than the fellow eye.
"Incyclo-" refers to a torsional deviation in which the eye is intorted, with the superior pole of the vertical meridian rotating nasally.
"Excyclo-" refers to a torsional deviation in which the eye is extorted, with the superior pole of the vertical meridian rotating temporally.
[5]
In strabismus, the eyes are not directed toward the same visual target simultaneously, representing a lack of coordinated binocular vision which may manifest as a constant or intermittent deviation in 1 or both eyes. Strabismus affects individuals across all age groups; the diagnosis is among the most common ocular conditions encountered in pediatric ophthalmology, while it also presents frequently in adults due to neurological, mechanical, or sensory causes. Beyond cosmetic misalignment, strabismus has profound functional implications, including amblyopia, impaired stereopsis, diplopia, abnormal head posture, and significant psychosocial burden. Early recognition and appropriate management are therefore critical to preserving visual development and optimizing long-term outcomes.[6]
Anatomy and Ocular Motor Control
Typical ocular alignment depends on the precise coordination of 6 extraocular muscles in each eye: the medial, lateral, superior, and inferior recti, and the superior and inferior oblique muscles. These muscles act in concert to produce conjugate eye movements, allowing both eyes to fixate on a single target. Innervation of the extraocular muscles is provided by cranial nerves III (oculomotor), IV (trochlear), and VI (abducens), which are integrated through complex supranuclear pathways involving the brainstem, cerebellum, basal ganglia, and cerebral cortex.[7]
Binocular vision relies on sensory fusion, which combines images from both eyes into a single percept, and motor fusion, which maintains ocular alignment through vergence mechanisms. Any disruption in this finely balanced system (whether sensory, motor, mechanical, or neurological) can result in strabismus. Refractive errors, particularly uncorrected hyperopia, may overload accommodative convergence mechanisms, while central nervous system abnormalities can impair ocular motor control. Structural abnormalities of the orbit or extraocular muscles further contribute to misalignment.[8]
Classification and General Patterns
Strabismus is broadly classified based on direction (esotropia, exotropia, hypertropia, hypotropia), laterality (unilateral or alternating), constancy (constant or intermittent), comitancy (comitant or incomitant), and age of onset (infantile or acquired). Comitant strabismus, where the angle of deviation remains constant in all gaze positions, is typically associated with childhood-onset conditions and refractive or sensory abnormalities. Incomitant strabismus, characterized by variable deviation depending on gaze direction, is more often linked to cranial nerve palsies, restrictive disorders, or orbital pathology.[9]
The condition may be congenital or acquired. Congenital or infantile strabismus typically presents within the first 6 months of life and is often associated with large-angle deviations and poor binocular function. Acquired strabismus may develop later in childhood or adulthood and frequently presents with diplopia, particularly in individuals who previously had normal binocular vision.[10]
Natural History
The natural history of strabismus depends on the underlying etiology, age of onset, and timeliness of intervention. In infants and young children, persistent ocular misalignment during critical periods of visual development can disrupt normal cortical visual processing. When one eye is consistently misaligned, the developing brain may suppress input from that eye to prevent diplopia, thereby leading to amblyopia. If untreated, amblyopia becomes increasingly resistant to therapy with age, underscoring the importance of early detection.[11]
In some cases, intermittent strabismus may remain stable or even improve, particularly with appropriate refractive correction or treatment of underlying sensory deficits. However, many forms of strabismus tend to progress over time, with increasing frequency or magnitude of deviation. Long-standing strabismus may result in loss of binocular fusion, anomalous retinal correspondence, and adaptation mechanisms that complicate later management.[12]
In adults, the natural history differs significantly. Acute-onset strabismus in adulthood is often symptomatic and may indicate serious underlying pathology such as stroke, intracranial mass, aneurysm, thyroid eye disease, or myasthenia gravis. Chronic adult strabismus, particularly when longstanding since childhood, may be well tolerated but can still lead to asthenopia, reduced depth perception, and social or occupational difficulties.[13]
Patterns of Spread and Functional Impact
Although strabismus is not a disease that “spreads” in the infectious sense, it demonstrates characteristic patterns of progression and secondary involvement. A unilateral deviation in early childhood may evolve into alternating strabismus as suppression develops, or a latent deviation (phoria) may decompensate into a manifest deviation (tropia) under conditions of fatigue, illness, or visual stress. Sensory deprivation in one eye, such as from cataract, corneal opacity, or retinal disease, can lead to secondary strabismus, which may worsen as visual input declines.[9]
Strabismus also exerts effects beyond ocular alignment. Loss of stereopsis affects fine motor coordination, spatial judgment, and occupational performance. Children with visible strabismus may experience social stigmatization, reduced self-esteem, and impaired psychosocial development. Adults may report difficulty with reading, driving, and prolonged visual tasks, as well as anxiety related to cosmetic appearance and diplopia.[14]
Epidemiological and Developmental Considerations
Strabismus often reflects systemic or developmental conditions. The condition is more prevalent in premature infants, children with low birth weight, and those with neurodevelopmental disorders such as cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and autism spectrum disorder. In adults, vascular risk factors, trauma, endocrine disorders, and autoimmune diseases contribute to acquired forms. These associations highlight strabismus as a marker of broader neurological or systemic disease rather than an isolated ocular condition.[13]
Clinical Relevance
Understanding the anatomy, natural history, and progression patterns of strabismus is fundamental to effective diagnosis and management. Early identification allows timely intervention to prevent amblyopia and preserve binocular vision in children, while accurate evaluation in adults ensures prompt recognition of potentially life-threatening causes. Given its multifactorial nature, strabismus requires a comprehensive, patient-centered approach that integrates sensory, motor, and neurological assessment.[15]
In summary, strabismus is a complex disorder of ocular alignment with diverse etiologies and significant visual and psychosocial consequences. Its impact extends across the lifespan, and its course is shaped by developmental timing, underlying pathology, and access to appropriate care. A thorough understanding of its anatomical basis, natural history, and functional progression underpins effective evaluation, treatment planning, and interprofessional management.[16]
Etiology
Strabismus results from the disruption of the finely balanced mechanisms responsible for ocular alignment and binocular vision (see Image. Etiologic Pathways in Strabismus). These mechanisms include extraocular muscle function, cranial nerve innervation, supranuclear control centers, sensory fusion pathways, and accommodative–vergence interactions. Etiologically, strabismus is multifactorial and may arise from congenital, developmental, neurological, mechanical, refractive, sensory, or systemic causes. In many patients, multiple etiologic factors contribute to the final clinical presentation (see Table. Etiologies of Strabismus).[14]
Congenital and Developmental Causes
Congenital strabismus typically presents within the first 6 months of life and is often idiopathic, though it may be associated with abnormal maturation of binocular vision pathways. Infantile esotropia is a classic example, characterized by large-angle deviation, cross-fixation, latent nystagmus, and inferior oblique overaction. Developmental delay, prematurity, low birth weight, and perinatal hypoxia increase the risk by interfering with normal cortical and brainstem ocular motor development.[3] Familial clustering has also been observed, and children with an affected parent or sibling have an increased risk of developing strabismus.[17]
Refractive Etiologies
Uncorrected refractive errors are a leading cause of childhood strabismus. Hyperopia increases accommodative effort, which in turn triggers excessive accommodative convergence, resulting in accommodative or partially accommodative esotropia. High anisometropia disrupts sensory fusion, predisposing to sensory strabismus. Myopia is more commonly associated with exotropia, particularly in older children and adolescents.[13] Abnormal accommodative–vergence relationships and reduced fusional reserves may further contribute to the development or decompensation of latent ocular deviations.[18]
Sensory Causes
Any condition that degrades visual input in one eye during the critical period of visual development may lead to sensory strabismus. Common causes include congenital cataract, corneal opacities, retinal dystrophies, optic nerve hypoplasia, and severe ptosis. In adults, acquired visual loss from trauma, retinal disease, or optic neuropathy can similarly disrupt fusion, resulting in secondary strabismus.[19] Other causes that interfere with clear image formation include uncorrected refractive errors, anisometropia, media opacities, obstruction of the pupillary axis, and macular or optic nerve disease.[20]
Neurological Causes
Neurological etiologies include supranuclear, nuclear, and infranuclear disorders. Cranial nerve palsies (III, IV, and VI) are frequent causes of acquired incomitant strabismus. Central nervous system conditions such as stroke, intracranial tumors, demyelinating disease, hydrocephalus, and neurodegenerative disorders may impair ocular motor control. Pediatric neurological conditions such as cerebral palsy are strongly associated with both comitant and incomitant strabismus.[21] Additional neurogenic causes include congenital hypoplasia of ocular motor nuclei, trauma, infections, toxic exposures (eg, alcohol, lead, carbon monoxide), and vascular disorders affecting cranial nerves controlling extraocular muscles (eg, ophthalmoplegic migraine).[22]
Mechanical and Restrictive Causes
Mechanical restriction of extraocular muscle movement leads to restrictive strabismus. Thyroid eye disease is the most common cause in adults, producing fibrosis and enlargement of extraocular muscles. Orbital fractures with muscle entrapment, postoperative scarring, orbital tumors, and congenital craniofacial anomalies also result in mechanical misalignment.[14][23] Myogenic disorders such as congenital extraocular muscle abnormalities, post-viral myositis, or chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia may also impair ocular motility and contribute to incomitant strabismus.
Systemic and Genetic Associations
Strabismus is more prevalent in systemic syndromes such as Down syndrome, Apert syndrome, Crouzon syndrome, and Marfan syndrome. Genetic factors influence ocular motor development, with familial clustering observed in several types of strabismus. Metabolic and neuromuscular disorders, including myasthenia gravis and mitochondrial diseases, may also manifest with variable ocular misalignment.[17][24]
Table. Etiologies of Strabismus.
Key Clinical Insight
Strabismus is rarely attributable to a single cause. Accurate etiologic classification is essential, as management strategies differ substantially between refractive, neurological, sensory, and mechanical forms (see Image. Etiology of Strabismus).
Epidemiology
Strabismus is one of the most common ocular motility disorders worldwide, with significant implications for visual development, binocular function, and quality of life. The global prevalence of strabismus in the general population ranges from 2% to 5%, although reported rates vary by age group, ethnicity, diagnostic criteria, and access to pediatric eye care (see Table. Epidemiology of Strabismus by Age, Sex, and Region). Strabismus is predominantly a disorder of childhood, but it may persist into adulthood or present de novo later in life due to neurologic, systemic, or sensory causes.[25]
In the United States, population-based studies estimate the prevalence of manifest strabismus in children to be approximately 3% to 4%, making it a leading cause of pediatric ophthalmology referrals. Esotropia is the most common form of strabismus in early childhood, particularly accommodative esotropia, which typically presents between 6 months and 6 years of age. Exotropia, especially intermittent exotropia, becomes more prevalent with increasing age and is frequently diagnosed during late childhood and adolescence. Adult-onset strabismus in the US has an estimated prevalence of 4% in individuals over 40 years, often related to cranial nerve palsies, thyroid eye disease, diabetes, stroke, or previous ocular surgery.[26]
Sex distribution in strabismus is generally equal or near-equal in most pediatric population studies. However, specific subtypes demonstrate sex predilection. Infantile esotropia shows a slight male predominance, whereas intermittent exotropia and strabismus associated with thyroid eye disease are more common in women. Adult strabismus secondary to vascular causes is more prevalent in men, reflecting the underlying systemic disease burden.[27]
Globally, the epidemiology of strabismus shows marked regional and ethnic variation (see Image. Epidemiology of Strabismus). Studies from East Asia report a higher prevalence of exotropia compared to esotropia, whereas Western populations demonstrate the opposite pattern. In African and South Asian populations, the overall prevalence appears slightly lower, though underdiagnosis and limited access to pediatric eye care likely contribute to underreporting. In low- and middle-income countries, strabismus often remains untreated, leading to higher rates of amblyopia and long-term visual disability.[28]
Prematurity, low birth weight, neurodevelopmental delay, cerebral palsy, and genetic syndromes significantly increase the risk of strabismus across all populations. Children with special healthcare needs may have a prevalence as high as 20% to 50%, underscoring the importance of early screening in high-risk groups. Familial aggregation is well recognized, with children of affected parents demonstrating a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of developing strabismus.[29]
From a public health perspective, strabismus represents not only a visual disorder but also a condition with psychosocial consequences, including reduced self-esteem, social stigmatization, and employment-related challenges in adulthood. These epidemiologic insights emphasize the need for early detection programs, equitable access to eye care, and longitudinal follow-up, particularly in underserved populations.[30]
Table. Epidemiology of Strabismus by Age, Sex, and Region.
Pathophysiology
Strabismus results from a disruption in the finely coordinated neuromuscular mechanisms that align both eyes on a single visual target. Normal ocular alignment depends on the integrated function of extraocular muscles, their cranial nerve innervation (III, IV, VI), supranuclear control centers, sensory fusion pathways, and accommodative–vergence coupling (see Table. Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Strabismus). Dysfunction at any of these levels, whether congenital or acquired, can lead to persistent ocular misalignment.[31]
Two classic theories have historically been proposed to explain the development of strabismus. Worth proposed that strabismus arises from an inherent deficiency of cortical fusion potential, resulting in failure to maintain binocular alignment.[32] In contrast, Chavasse suggested that abnormal motor alignment leads secondarily to impaired sensory fusion and binocular function.[3] These concepts continue to inform clinical management, particularly the rationale for early surgical alignment in conditions such as infantile esotropia to support the development of binocular single vision.
Normal ocular motility is governed by well-established physiologic principles. Sherrington's law of reciprocal innervation states that increased innervation to an agonist muscle is accompanied by decreased innervation to its antagonist. Herring's law of equal innervation states that synergistic muscles in both eyes receive equal and simultaneous neural input during conjugate gaze. Disruption of these coordinated neural mechanisms contributes to abnormal ocular alignment in many forms of strabismus.
In early life, immaturity or disruption of binocular sensory input interferes with cortical fusion and the development of stereopsis, predisposing infants and toddlers to comitant strabismus. In contrast, acquired strabismus in older children and adults often reflects neuromuscular, mechanical, or neurologic pathology and frequently presents as incomitant deviations with gaze limitation. Persistent ocular misalignment elicits adaptive cortical responses in children, such as suppression and anomalous retinal correspondence, whereas adults typically experience diplopia because sensory adaptation is limited with age.[24]
Table. Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Strabismus.
Infantile (Congenital) Strabismus
Infantile strabismus typically manifests within the first 6 months of life and is most commonly seen as congenital esotropia. The pathophysiology is primarily related to an early failure of binocular sensory fusion during a critical period of visual development. Immaturity or dysfunction of supranuclear pathways controlling vergence and ocular alignment prevents the normal establishment of binocular cortical connections. As a result, the developing visual system suppresses input from the deviated eye to avoid diplopia, leading to stable comitant deviations and a high risk of amblyopia. Structural abnormalities of extraocular muscles are uncommon, and the deviation is usually large and constant.[33]
Accommodative Strabismus
Accommodative strabismus arises from an abnormal relationship between accommodation and convergence, most often due to uncorrected hyperopia. Excessive accommodative effort to achieve clear vision results in disproportionately increased accommodative convergence, causing esodeviation. In fully accommodative esotropia, optical correction restores alignment by reducing accommodative demand. In partially accommodative cases, a residual non-accommodative component persists due to long-standing neuromuscular adaptation or secondary muscle imbalance. The underlying pathophysiology of this type of strabismus is functional rather than structural, highlighting the critical role of refractive error and neural coupling mechanisms.[34]
Sensory Strabismus
Sensory strabismus develops secondary to unilateral or asymmetric visual impairment from conditions such as cataract, corneal opacity, retinal disease, or severe anisometropia. Loss of clear visual input disrupts sensory fusion, which is essential for maintaining ocular alignment. Without binocular sensory feedback, the affected eye gradually drifts, commonly into exotropia. The deviation may increase over time and is often poorly controlled. Unlike infantile strabismus, the primary defect lies in the sensory pathway rather than in motor control, and correction of the underlying visual deficit is crucial for long-term alignment stability.[35]
Paralytic (Neurogenic) Strabismus
Paralytic strabismus results from dysfunction of cranial nerves III, IV, or VI, leading to underaction of the corresponding extraocular muscles. The imbalance between agonist and antagonist muscles causes incomitant deviations that vary with gaze direction. The pathophysiology of this subtype involves interruption of nerve conduction due to congenital anomalies, trauma, ischemia, inflammation, or intracranial pathology. Because sensory fusion is intact in adults, patients typically experience diplopia rather than suppression. Secondary muscle contracture and aberrant regeneration may occur with chronicity, further complicating ocular motility.[36]
Restrictive Strabismus
Restrictive strabismus is caused by mechanical limitation of extraocular muscle movement rather than neuromuscular dysfunction. In these cases, fibrosis, scarring, muscle entrapment, or abnormal orbital anatomy physically restricts globe rotation. Common examples include thyroid eye disease, orbital fractures, postoperative scarring, and congenital fibrosis syndromes. The pathophysiology of this subtype involves increased passive resistance to muscle stretch, resulting in gaze-dependent limitations and positive forced duction testing. Chronic restriction may lead to secondary muscle overaction and incomitant deviations.[37]
Intermittent Strabismus
Intermittent strabismus, most commonly intermittent exotropia, reflects a fragile balance between motor alignment and sensory fusion. Patients can maintain alignment under optimal conditions but decompensate with fatigue, illness, inattention, or stress. The underlying pathophysiology of this subtype includes reduced fusional reserves, delayed vergence responses, and impaired cortical control of binocular vision. Over time, repeated decompensation may result in loss of sensory fusion and progression to constant strabismus.[38]
Consecutive Strabismus
Consecutive strabismus refers to a deviation that develops after treatment of an initial misalignment, most often following strabismus surgery. This subtype may develop due to surgical overcorrection, altered muscle length–tension relationships, scarring, or disruption of previously established sensory adaptations. In children, sensory plasticity may allow partial adaptation, whereas adults often experience diplopia. Careful surgical planning and postoperative monitoring are essential to minimize this complication.[39]
Syndromic and Genetic Strabismus
Certain forms of strabismus occur as part of broader congenital or genetic syndromes, such as Duane retraction syndrome, Möbius syndrome, and congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles. These conditions result from abnormal development of cranial nerve nuclei, aberrant innervation, or primary muscle fibrosis. The pathophysiology is complex and multifactorial, involving both neural miswiring and mechanical restriction, often leading to characteristic motility patterns and limited treatment options.[40]
Clinical Insight
Across all types, strabismus represents a dynamic interaction between motor imbalance and sensory adaptation, with age of onset playing a pivotal role in symptomatology and prognosis. Early-onset strabismus is associated with suppression and amblyopia, whereas late-onset strabismus is associated with diplopia and visual discomfort.[39]
Histopathology
Strabismus is primarily a disorder of ocular alignment and neuromuscular control; therefore, histopathologic evaluation is not routinely required for diagnosis. However, microscopic examination of extraocular muscles, tendons, neuromuscular junctions, and associated orbital tissues has provided valuable insights into the underlying disease mechanisms, particularly in surgically treated, syndromic, paralytic, or restrictive forms. Histopathologic findings vary according to the etiology, duration, and type of strabismus and reflect abnormalities in muscle fiber composition, innervation, fibrosis, and vascular supply (see Table. Histopathologic Features of Strabismus by Etiology).[41]
Extraocular Muscle Fiber Abnormalities
Healthy extraocular muscles contain a unique mixture of fast-twitch, slow-twitch, singly innervated fibers (SIFs), and multiply innervated fibers (MIFs), allowing fine ocular movements. In strabismus, histologic studies have demonstrated alterations in muscle fiber size, distribution, and morphology, including hypertrophy, atrophy, and fiber-type grouping. Chronic strabismus is often associated with selective atrophy of fast-twitch fibers and compensatory hypertrophy of slow-twitch fibers, which together contribute to sustained deviations and impaired rapid saccades.[42] Light microscopic studies of strabismic extraocular muscles have also demonstrated disorganized muscle fibers with atrophy, swelling, and focal degeneration compared with the tightly arranged fibers and clear striations seen in healthy extraocular muscle tissue.[43]
Ultrastructural Changes
Transmission electron microscopy of healthy extraocular muscle demonstrates intact basal membranes and sarcolemma, tightly aligned myofibrils with well-organized sarcomeres, preserved Z lines and H zones, and evenly distributed mitochondria. In contrast, strabismic extraocular muscles may demonstrate ultrastructural abnormalities including vacuolation and degeneration of myofibrils, accumulation of lipid droplets, subsarcolemmal inclusions, and clustering of mitochondria.[43]
Neuromuscular Junction and Innervation Changes
Neuromuscular junction abnormalities are frequently observed in paralytic and congenital strabismus. Histopathology may reveal reduced motor end-plate density, fragmented acetylcholine receptor distribution, and abnormal nerve terminal branching. In conditions such as congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles and Duane retraction syndrome, aberrant innervation patterns are evident, with misdirected or absent cranial nerve fibers leading to anomalous muscle activation and co-contraction.[44]
Fibrosis and Extracellular Matrix Remodelling
Long-standing strabismus and restrictive subtypes demonstrate increased interstitial fibrosis within the extraocular muscles and surrounding connective tissue. Microscopic examination shows excessive collagen deposition, increased fibroblast activity, and reduced muscle elasticity. In thyroid eye disease–associated strabismus, histopathology demonstrates glycosaminoglycan (GAG) accumulation, edema, lymphocytic infiltration, and eventual fibrotic replacement of muscle tissue, collectively accounting for progressive motility restriction.[45] Similar degenerative and fibrotic changes have also been described in syndromic strabismus; for example, extraocular muscle biopsies in individuals with Down syndrome may show extensive vacuolation, myofibril disintegration, and intracellular and extracellular collagen fibril deposition.[43]
Vascular and Ischemic Changes
The chronic muscle imbalance inherent to strabismus may result in microvascular alterations over time. Histologic sections sometimes reveal capillary rarefaction, vascular congestion, and focal ischemic changes, particularly in paralytic strabismus due to ischemic cranial neuropathies. These vascular abnormalities may further impair muscle metabolism and regeneration.[45]
Inflammatory Changes
Inflammation is not a primary feature of most strabismus types; however, secondary inflammatory infiltrates may be present in post-traumatic, postoperative, or autoimmune-related cases. Lymphocytes, macrophages, and cytokine-mediated tissue remodeling have been described, especially in acquired restrictive strabismus.[46]
Developmental and Genetic Disorders
In syndromic strabismus, histopathological examination often reveals developmental defects. Muscle biopsies may show hypoplastic muscles, disorganized sarcomeres, mitochondrial abnormalities, and reduced satellite cell populations, indicating impaired muscle growth and regeneration. These findings correlate with poor surgical responsiveness and persistent motility limitations.[47]
Clinicopathologic Correlation
These histopathologic changes explain many clinical features of strabismus, including incomitance, progression over time, resistance to surgical correction, and recurrence. Fibrosis and altered muscle fiber composition account for the reduced surgical elasticity, whereas aberrant innervation accounts for the paradoxical movements and globe retraction observed in specific syndromes.[7]
Table. Histopathologic Features of Strabismus by Etiology.
Key Takeaway
While strabismus is a clinical diagnosis, histopathologic studies reveal that it is not merely a functional disorder but often involves structural, neuromuscular, and extracellular matrix abnormalities that influence disease behavior and treatment outcomes.[40]
Toxicokinetics
Strabismus is not a toxicological disease; therefore, classic toxicokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of a toxin) does not play a primary role in its pathogenesis. However, toxicokinetic principles are clinically relevant in specific secondary and acquired forms of strabismus, particularly when ocular misalignment arises due to drug exposure, systemic toxins, or metabolic insults affecting the neuromuscular junction or central nervous system (CNS) (see Table. Drugs, Toxins, and Metabolic Factors Associated With Acquired Strabismus and Their Toxicokinetic Relevance).[7]
Drug- and Toxin-Induced Strabismus
Certain medications and toxins can induce strabismus by affecting extraocular muscle function, neuromuscular transmission, or cranial nerve integrity. After systemic absorption (oral, intravenous, or inhalational), these agents distribute to the CNS or neuromuscular junctions. Drugs such as antiepileptics (eg, phenytoin), benzodiazepines, lithium, alcohol, and chemotherapeutic agents may cause transient or persistent ocular misalignment by depressing central ocular motor control, altering neurotransmitter release, or inducing cerebellar or brainstem toxicity. Dose, duration of exposure, plasma half-life, and the drug’s ability to cross the blood–brain barrier influence the onset and severity of the induced strabismus.[48]
Neurotoxic Mechanisms
Neurotoxins (eg, botulinum toxin, organophosphates, heavy metals) exert their effects by disrupting synaptic transmission or axonal transport. Botulinum toxin, when intentionally administered, produces a localized, dose-dependent chemodenervation of extraocular muscles by blocking acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. The toxicokinetics of botulinum toxin is characterized by minimal systemic absorption, local diffusion, gradual synaptic recovery, and functional reversal over weeks to months; these properties can be therapeutically leveraged in the management of strabismus.[49]
Metabolic and Endogenous Toxins
Endogenous toxic metabolites in conditions such as thyroid dysfunction, uremia, hepatic encephalopathy, or mitochondrial disorders may impair ocular motor pathways. These metabolites accumulate due to altered metabolism or clearance and may affect extraocular muscle energetics or their respective cranial nerves (III, IV, and VI), leading to acquired strabismus. Resolution or improvement in the strabismus often parallels correction of the underlying metabolic disturbance.[50]
Clinical Relevance
From a clinical standpoint, understanding toxicokinetics is important for:
Identifying reversible causes of acquired strabismus
Adjusting or discontinuing offending agents
Predicting recovery timelines based on drug half-life and tissue clearance
Safely using botulinum toxin as a therapeutic modality
Key Point
While strabismus is not inherently a toxicokinetic disorder, toxicokinetic principles are relevant in drug-induced, neurotoxic, metabolic, and therapeutic contexts, where absorption, tissue distribution, duration of exposure, and clearance directly influence the onset, severity, and reversibility of ocular misalignment (see Image. Toxicokinetic Pathway Leading to Acquired Strabismus).[11]
Table. Drugs, Toxins, and Metabolic Factors Associated With Acquired Strabismus and Their Toxicokinetic Relevance.
History and Physical
Although strabismus can occur at any age, it is most commonly diagnosed before age 6, with a peak incidence at approximately 3 years. Parents often report that the child has had crossed eyes since birth. Family photographs often help to document the age of onset, and images may reveal ocular preference during fixation. Alternating fixation indicates the absence of amblyopia in infants with squint. A strong fixation in one eye indicates strabismic amblyopia in the other eye.[1] A low birth weight history indicates prematurity retinopathy, which might lead to pseudostrabismus from the ectopic macula.
The acute onset of esotropia in an older child always requires a thorough evaluation to rule out neurological abnormalities. The important details to elicit from parents or caretakers include the age of onset of the deviation, any preceding history of physical illness, the nature of the deviation (constant or intermittent), any changes in the deviation with illness or fatigue, and whether the deviation occurs dominantly in one eye or alternates (see Table 1. Key History Elements in the Evaluation of Strabismus).[5] Intermittent strabismus, in which fusion is present part of the time, is generally associated with a better prognosis for recovery of normal binocular vision. Photosensitivity is commonly observed in intermittent exotropia and is associated with a decreased binocular photophobia threshold.[51] Obtaining a detailed history to screen for allergies to dilating drops, familial hepatic porphyria, sensitivity to suxamethonium, and malignant hyperthermia is essential to prevent fatal anesthetic complications during the surgical management of strabismus.[52]
In addition to a careful history, the physical examination is a crucial component in the evaluation of strabismus (see Table 2. Physical Examination Findings in Strabismus). The following subsections detail the clinical features of the most common types of strabismus (see Table 3. Common Clinical Presentations by Type of Strabismus).
Essential Infantile Esotropia (Congenital Esotropia)
Large-angle stable esotropia typically presents within 6 months of age with a positive family history and no neurological deficit. Refractive error is uncommon and has poor potential for binocular single vision (BSV). Cross fixation, asymmetrical optokinetic response, and latent horizontal nystagmus are typically seen. Dissociated vertical deviation (DVD) develops in 80% of children by age 3. Treatment is aimed at correcting hyperopia and treating amblyopia. Muscle surgery should be performed early, between 6 months and 2 years of age.[53]
Accommodative Esotropia
The typical age of onset for accommodative esotropia is between 2 and 5 years. The condition is often precipitated by trauma or illness, and most patients present with less than 10 prism diopters (PD) deviation. Amblyopia and family history of strabismus are common. Accommodative esotropia results from uncorrected hypermetropia, excessive accommodative convergence, and inadequate fusional divergence. A normal accommodation convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio with hyperopia greater than 2 diopters (D) is seen in the refractive type, while the nonrefractive type shows a high AC/A ratio without clinically significant hyperopia. Treatment includes full cycloplegic correction and short-term miotics for children who are unable to wear spectacles. If the AC/A ratio is high, bifocals are prescribed with the minimum plus addition required for near vision to control the esodeviation. Surgery is indicated if the residual esotropia is less than 10 PD.[54]
Microtropia
Microtropia, or monofixation syndrome, is a unilateral abnormality of BSV with amblyopia and ultra-small angle deviation of less than 5° or 8 PD. Anisometropia is seen in nearly all patients with reduced stereopsis, abnormal retinal correspondence (ARC), normal motor fusion, and foveal suppression scotoma. A 4-prism-diopter base-out prism placed in front of the nonfixating eye will not produce a refixation movement in microtropia, because the image is displaced within the central suppression scotoma. Treatment involves correcting the anisometropia and amblyopia.[55]
Intermittent Exotropia
This strabismus subtype typically presents around age 2 as exophoria which resolves to exotropia under conditions of visual inattention, bright light, fatigue, or illness. Other features include headache, asthenopia, diplopia, photo-diplopia, micropsia, abnormal stereopsis, and temporal retinal hemisuppression. Treatment should begin with the correction of refractive errors and amblyopia. Orthoptic exercises, including pencil push-ups, provide some benefit. A bilateral lateral rectus recession is a commonly performed strabismus surgery to correct the divergence excess.[38]
Dissociated Vertical Deviation (DVD)
This bilateral, asymmetric, and asymptomatic strabismus typically presents around age 2 and is commonly associated with congenital esotropia (75%). The condition presents as an updraft with excyclotropia of the eye, occurring under cover or during visual inattention. When the cover is removed, the affected eye moves downward without the corresponding downward drift of the other eye. This downdrift of the occluded eye is also observed when the fixating eye is occluded with increasing neutral-density filters. This finding is referred to as the Bielschowsky phenomenon, and it is specific to DVD. Inferior oblique overaction (IOOA) is the most common condition in the differential diagnosis of DVD and can be distinguished by the absence of the Bielschowsky phenomenon. The surgery of choice is superior rectus recession with retroequatorial myopexy (Faden procedure).[56]
Monocular Elevation Deficiency
Also known as the double elevator palsy, this condition presents as a unilateral total inability to elevate the affected eye, accompanied by hypotropia in primary gaze, ptosis, and a compensatory chin-up position. The procedure of choice is the Knapp procedure (a full tendon width vertical transposition of the horizontal recti) for superior rectus weakness and an inferior rectus recession for inferior rectus restriction.[57]
Alphabet Patterns
Alphabet patterns describe gaze-dependent changes in horizontal deviation in which the magnitude of esotropia or exotropia varies between upgaze and downgaze. When the deviation increases in upgaze and decreases in downgaze, the finding is considered a V pattern, whereas an A pattern shows the opposite. V patterns are more common and are often associated with inferior oblique overaction.[58]
Duane Retraction Syndrome
This congenital syndrome is characterized by globe retraction during adduction and palpebral fissure narrowing. In severe cases, globe up-shoot or down-shoot is seen with adduction. The condition is more commonly observed in girls, with a preponderance for the left eye; bilateral involvement occurs in 20% of cases. Duane retraction syndrome is caused by an anomalous congenital innervation of the lateral rectus by the third cranial nerve due to agenesis of the sixth cranial nerve (pontine agenesis). The associated globe retraction is the result of the co-contraction of both the medial and lateral recti. Surgery is indicated in cases of significant heterotopia in primary gaze, abnormal head position, cosmetically unacceptable globe retraction, and up-shoot/down-shoot movements.[59]
Brown Syndrome
This restrictive disorder of the superior oblique tendon can be congenital or acquired and presents as a limitation of elevation in adduction. Congenital Brown syndrome presents bilaterally in 10% of cases, is more common in girls, and affects the right eye more frequently. Acquired cases are due to trauma or inflammation (rheumatoid arthritis, sinusitis, scleritis, etc) of the superior oblique tendon. On examination, the forced duction test is positive on retropulsion.[60]
Mobius Syndrome
Mobius syndrome presents as an inability to abduct either eye beyond midline, with normal vertical gaze. The condition is due to congenital bilateral aplasia of the sixth and seventh cranial nerves.[61]
Oculomotor Palsy
Third cranial nerve palsy presents as ptosis with an abducted and intorted eye with defective accommodation.[62]
Lateral Rectus Palsy
This condition presents as an esotropic eye with limited abduction.[63]
Superior Oblique Palsy
This disorder presents as an ipsilateral limitation of depression on adduction, excyclotorsion, and vertical and torsional diplopia with downward gaze. A Parks 3-step test helps diagnose the paretic muscle in vertical diplopia, especially in superior oblique palsy. A right superior oblique palsy presents as hypertropia on primary gaze with increasing hypertropia on left gaze and a right-sided head tilt.[64] The head is tilted and turned towards the opposite side, with the chin depressed. Bilateral cases show right hypertropia in right gaze and left hypertropia in left gaze, with less than 10° cyclodeviation on the double Maddox rod test, and chin depression without head tilt. Superior oblique palsy may be congenital or acquired. Acquired causes include trauma, vascular lesions, aneurysms, and tumors. Surgery involves superior oblique strengthening by tucking/tenoplication or the Harada Ito procedure, which involves splitting and anterolateral transposition of the lateral half of the superior oblique tendon.[65]
Table 1. Key History Elements in the Evaluation of Strabismus.
Table 2. Physical Examination Findings in Strabismus.
Table 3. Common Clinical Presentations by Type of Strabismus.
Red Flags in Strabismus
Immediate referral or urgent investigation is required if any of the following are present:
Sudden-onset strabismus in an adult
Acute binocular diplopia
Associated neurological symptoms (headache, vomiting, altered consciousness, weakness)
Painful eye movements or orbital pain
Rapidly progressive deviation
Ptosis with ophthalmoplegia (possible third nerve palsy)
Proptosis or lid retraction (suggestive of thyroid eye disease or orbital pathology)
Strabismus associated with papilledema or optic disc edema
New-onset strabismus in a child with developmental regression
Poor visual acuity with leukocoria or abnormal fundus reflex
[66]
Key Clinical Pearl
Strabismus is not merely a cosmetic condition—acute or atypical presentations may be the first sign of serious neurological or systemic disease and warrant prompt evaluation.
Evaluation
Evaluation of strabismus involves systematic assessment of visual function, ocular alignment, ocular motility, binocular vision, and targeted diagnostic testing to determine the underlying cause and guide management.
Visual Acuity
Visual acuity assessment should be adapted to the patient’s developmental stage and ability to cooperate. In infants, fixation behavior can be evaluated using the CSM (central, steady, maintained) method by observing the corneal light reflex and the ability of the eyes to fixate and follow a moving light source.[67] In preverbal children, preferential-looking methods such as the Cardiff picture cards can be used to estimate visual acuity.[68] For children who have difficulty cooperating with occlusion or formal testing, behavioral observation and modified testing techniques may be necessary.[69] In older children who can participate in standard visual acuity testing, charts such as the Snellen chart, Illiterate E chart, or Sheridan–Gardiner chart may be used.[70]
Stereoacuity
Stereoacuity measures the visual sense of depth. It is the sense of fusion of 2 simultaneous, slightly dissimilar images with integration by the brain. The Titmus stereo-fly test and Lang cards are commonly used. The Worth 4-dot test and Bagolini striated glasses are used to assess the fusional reserve, while both stereopsis and fusion can be assessed by synoptophore.[71]
Compensator Head Posture (CHP)
CHP is a motor adaptation to strabismus to attain BSV. Loss of CHP in concomitant strabismus may indicate the loss of BSV and warrants surgical intervention. In acquired paretic strabismus, CHP eliminates diplopia and helps to centralize the binocular visual field. Head tilt, face turn, and chin up or down are commonly seen as abnormal head postures. A head tilt to the left is seen in right superior oblique palsy. A face turn to the left is seen in left lateral rectus palsy. Chin up or down is seen in the "A" or "V" pattern strabismus.[72]
AC/A Ratio
The accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio is the amount of convergence in prism diopters per diopter change in accommodation. Two methods are used to measure the AC/A ratio: the lens gradient method and the heterophoria method. The normative range lies between 3 and 5 to 1.[73]
Measurement of Deviation
Hirschberg test: The Hirshberg test gives a rough estimate of the angle of manifest strabismus by noting the position of the corneal light reflex produced by shining a light over the cornea. Each millimeter of deviation equals 7° of deviation or 14 PD, assuming the pupil is 4 mm in diameter. If the light reflex is at the temporal border of the pupil, then the angle of deviation of esotropia is about 15°, and if it is at the limbus, the angle is about 45°.
[74] Krimsky test: This test uses prisms placed in front of the fixating eye to measure the deviation. The modified Krimsky test is done by holding the prism in front of the deviating eye. This test is used to measure tropias and not for phorias.
[75] Cover test: The cover test is performed to detect heterotropia. The fixating eye is covered, and movement of the uncovered eye is observed at both distance and near fixation.
[76] Uncover test: The uncover test detects heterophoria. After covering an eye for 2 to 3 seconds, the same eye movement is observed on uncovering. This test is done for both distance and near. Most examiners do the cover test and uncover test sequentially; the combination is often referred to as simply the "cover–uncover" test.
[77] Alternate cover test: This dissociation test reveals the total deviation when fusion is interrupted. This test should be performed only after the cover–uncover test as patients with poor fusional control may decompensate to a manifest deviation when this test is done. The speed and smoothness of recovery are noted following a fast cover–uncover test done alternatively to both eyes.
[78] Prism cover test: This test combines the alternative cover test with a prism for both near and distant fixation.
[79] Maddox wing: This test dissociates the eyes for near fixation (33 cm) and measures heterophoria. When gazing through this instrument, the right eye sees only the arrows (white vertical and red horizontal), while the left eye sees only rows of numbers (horizontal and vertical). The white arrow position denotes horizontal deviation, and the red arrow denotes vertical deviation. By aligning the red arrow parallel to the horizontal row of a number, cyclophoria can be measured.
[80] Maddox rod: The Maddox rod converts a white light spot into a perpendicular red streak by a series of fused cylindrical red glass rods. The amount of dissociation is calculated by the superimposition of the 2 images using the prisms.
[81]
Targeted Diagnostic Testing
Ocular motility
Ocular motility is assessed by evaluating extraocular movements, including smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements.
Versions: All 9 diagnostic positions of gaze binocularly are assessed with a light or a pen, and the cover–uncover test is done in each cardinal position to assess tropia/phoria.
[77] Ductions: Ductions are monocular eye movements elicited in all 6 cardinal positions by occluding the other eye. Ductions are assessed if ocular motility limitations are noticed in either or both eyes. Underaction is graded from -1 to -4 with increasing degrees of underaction, and 0 indicates full movement.
[82] Vergence: Vergence movements include convergence and divergence and are assessed to evaluate binocular alignment during near and distance fixation.
Near point of convergence: Near point of convergence (NPC) is the nearest point at which the patient reports diplopia when tested with a Royal Air Force (RAF) rule. It should be nearer than 10 cm.
Near point of accommodation: Near point of accommodation (NPA) is the nearest point at which the eyes can maintain clear focus when tested with the RAF rule. At 20 years of age, the average NPA is 8 cm and recedes to 46 cm by 50 years.
Fusional amplitudes: Fusional amplitudes measure the efficacy of vergence movements and are tested with prism bars or synoptophores.
Postoperative diplopia test: This test is mandatory for all patients older than 7 years before strabismus surgery. Prisms larger than the planned correction for the deviation are placed in front of the deviating eye. Successful suppression conveys a lower risk of diplopia following surgery. Intermittent or constant diplopia is an indication to perform diagnostic botulinum toxin tests before the surgery.
[83]
Field of binocular single vision
The field of BSV is the area where bifoveal fusion of the fixated object occurs. The Hess chart assesses the field of BSV to diagnose and monitor patients with incomitant strabismus caused by either extraocular muscle palsy (cranial nerve III, IV, or VI palsies) or restriction (thyroid ophthalmopathy, blow-out fracture, or myasthenia gravis). The Hess chart uses either the Hess screen or Lees screen to chart the field by dissociating the ocular movements. Hess's screen uses a tangent screen with red-green goggles, and Lees's screen uses 2 glass screens at right angles.[84]
The following sequelae are seen in the extraocular muscles in a paretic squint:
As such, the following is the interpretation of the Hess chart appearance:
Refraction
Assessing the correct refractive error and power is crucial in managing strabismus. Most commonly, hypermetropia is seen in strabismus patients. Refraction should be done under both noncycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions. The standard practice involves instilling 1 drop of 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride twice every 5 minutes, followed by retinoscopy 30 minutes later.[86]
Forced duction test (FDT)
This test is performed to assess whether the limitation of movement is due to the mechanical restriction of the muscle (fibrosis/tethering). The anesthetized conjunctiva of the eye is held with forceps and moved first in the direction of the muscle action and later in all directions to assess for a restriction on the movement of the eye. This test is mandatory before any strabismus surgery.[87]
Parks-Bielschowsky 3-step test
This test is done in acquired vertical diplopia to isolate the paretic muscle; it aids in diagnosing superior oblique palsy.
Fundoscopy
A dilated fundus examination is mandatory to rule out intraocular pathologies like optic disc hypoplasia, macular scarring, or retinoblastoma, which may also result in a squint.[89]
Imaging studies
Neuroimaging is essential, especially in acute adult-onset strabismus, to rule out causes such as stroke, diabetic mononeuritis, myasthenia gravis, and thyroid eye disease. Rarely, a primary neurological disorder such as hydrocephalus, optic nerve glioma, medulloblastoma, or craniopharyngioma may cause childhood strabismus and require neuroimaging.[77]
4-prism base-out test
This test is useful for diagnosing patients with a small facultative scotoma in whom no obvious manifest deviation is present. A 4-prism-diopter with the base out is placed before one eye while the patient maintains binocular fixation, and the resulting ocular movements are observed. In patients with normal bifixation, placement of the prism induces a version movement toward the apex of the prism. The eye behind the prism moves toward the prism apex, and the fellow eye makes a conjugate movement in accordance with Hering's law of equal innervation. This movement is followed by a corrective refixation movement of the fellow eye to restore binocular fixation.
In patients with monofixation syndrome, no movement occurs when the prism is placed before the nonfixating eye, because the image is displaced within the central suppression scotoma. Similarly, when the prism is placed before the fixating eye, the conjugate movement may occur, but no corrective refixation movement is observed if the fellow eye is nonfixating. This test therefore useful for identifying microtropia or monofixation syndrome.[90]
Prism adaptation test
The prism adaptation test is used to assess binocular function and determine the stability of ocular alignment before strabismus surgery. Prisms are applied to neutralize the measured deviation while the patient maintains binocular fixation. Changes in alignment following prism wear help determine whether the deviation increases (prism adaptation) and assist in predicting postoperative alignment and the likelihood of achieving binocular fusion.[91]
Treatment / Management
The primary aim of treating strabismus is to restore proper ocular alignment. The secondary aims are to treat amblyopia, maintain binocularity, and eliminate diplopia (See Image. Strabismus Surgery). The following subsections detail the various methods of treating strabismus.
Observation
Strabismus secondary to myasthenia gravis, diabetic mononeuropathy, and posttraumatic restrictive strabismus mainly improve with time and the treatment of the primary cause. Some healthy neonates also show intermittent deviation of the eyes. These deviations are referred to as neonatal ocular misalignments; they usually reflect a normally developing vergence system. The deviations improve by 2 months and resolve in 4 months.[92]
Correction of Refractive Errors
The first step in managing any child with strabismus is to evaluate for a refractive error and correct it fully. The full correction of hypermetropia is the treatment of choice for all forms of esotropia. Full correction without subtracting any lens power for cycloplegia is prescribed. In convergence excess esotropia, executive bifocals are prescribed to relieve accommodation and thereby prevent accommodative convergence. The minimal plus add required to control the near deviation is prescribed, with the flat-top bifocal segment positioned to bisect the upper border of the pupil.[54] In intermittent exotropia, full myopic correction often controls the exotropia.[93]
Amblyopia Treatment
Strabismic amblyopia is reduced visual acuity in one or both eyes caused by ocular misalignment in the absence of any demonstrable visual pathway abnormality. Refractive correction alone is successful in improving amblyopia in nearly 1/3 of patients.[94] Patching the fellow eye to encourage the brain to use the amblyopic eye is the gold standard treatment for amblyopia. Patching for 2 to 6 hours per day is recommended and is most effective in children younger than 7. Atropine penalization (atropine 1% eyedrops twice daily in the fellow eye) is also as effective as occlusion.[95][96] As the effect of atropine actions lasts 2 to 3 weeks, frequent follow-ups are necessary to detect occlusion/reversal amblyopia of the fellow eye.
Orthoptics
Orthoptic exercises are commonly used to treat intermittent exotropia. Fusional exercises like pencil push-ups are done with a pencil held at arm’s length and slowly moved towards the nose, thereby inducing accommodation and strengthening convergence, which helps treat exotropia.
Prismatic Correction
Ophthalmic prisms move the image closer to the fovea and help improve sensory fusion. Prisms are prescribed for deviations less than 20 PD. Amblyopia, suppression, and anomalous retinal correspondence are contraindications for prism therapy.[97]
Pharmacological Therapy
Miotics act by inducing peripheral accommodation so that the patient uses less accommodation, thus reducing esotropia. Ecothiopate iodide 0.125% once daily is a short-term treatment for patients with accommodative esotropia. This treatment option can be used for young children or those unable to tolerate glasses.[98]
Botulinum Toxin
Botulinum toxin type A is used as a form of chemodenervation to cause temporary paralysis of the involved extraocular muscle, improving the strabismus. Botulinum toxin is used as an adjunct to surgical therapy and to assess postoperative diplopia if anticipated following strabismus surgery. This therapy can induce transient ptosis and vertical strabismus.[99]
Extraocular Muscle Surgery
Strabismus surgery should be considered only after conservative treatments have failed to correct the deviation. Esotropias with greater than 15 PD and exotropia with greater than 20 PD following full spectacle correction are candidates for surgery. Accommodative esotropias are not ideal candidates for surgery as surgery induces consecutive esotropia.[100][101] The ideal age for infantile strabismus surgery is before 2 years. A postsurgical deviation of less than 10 PD yields better binocular vision, whereas to achieve stereopsis, the residual deviation should be less than or equal to 4 PD.[102] A 60% reduction of the overall deviation or a deviation of less than or equal to 10 PD 6 weeks post-surgery is considered a successful outcome of horizontal strabismus surgery.[103]
The 3 main types of strabismus surgery are:
Weakening procedures: These procedures decrease the effective strength of muscle action. Recession, retro-equatorial myopexy or posterior fixation (Faden procedure), marginal myectomy, and myectomy (disinsertion) are weakening procedures.
Strengthening procedures: These procedures enhance the pull of the muscle. Resection, advancement, double-breasting or tenoplication, and cinching are the strengthening procedures.
Vector adjustment procedures: These transposition procedures alter the direction of muscle action. Hummelscheim, Jensen, O’Connor, Knapp, Callahan, Peter, and Helveston are examples of transpositioning procedures.
[104]
Important Considerations
Congenital/infantile esotropia
Early alignment is the key to developing binocular function. The first and most important step is correcting any underlying refractive errors and managing the amblyopia. The ideal age for surgical correction is 12 months, and the maximum age is 24 months. The surgical treatment of choice is either a bilateral medial rectus recession or a unilateral recession resection procedure. Angles less than 50° require bilateral medial rectus recession with unilateral lateral rectus resection. An alignment within 10 PD is an acceptable goal.[105]
Accommodative esotropia
In cases of accommodative esotropia, the AC/A ratio is normal, often with an underlying hypermetropia of +2.00 to +7.00 D. Cycloplegic retinoscopy is required in these cases. Fully accommodative esotropia is fully corrected with optical correction. BSV is present at all distances with optical correction. Partially accommodative esotropia is partially corrected with full hypermetropia glasses.[54]
Nonrefractive accommodative esotropia
In cases of nonrefractive accommodative esotropia, the AC/A ratio is high; as such, each dioptre of accommodation used by the patient results in a greater increase in convergence. Any underlying refractive errors should be treated first. Full cycloplegic refraction should be prescribed with only distance reduction. Bifocal glasses should be considered for convergence excess esotropia.[106]
Early-onset exotropia
Treatment for early-onset exotropia is mainly surgical and includes lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection.[107]
Intermittent exotropia
Any underlying refractive errors must be ruled out as the initial step in managing intermittent exotropia. Spectacle correction in myopic patients can stimulate the accommodation and control deviation. Part-time occlusion of the dominant eye can improve control in some patients. Orthoptic exercises may be helpful to control the near deviation. Surgical correction is indicated in patients with poor control or loss of distance stereopsis. Unilateral recession resection procedures are generally preferred except in the case of true distance exotropia, for which lateral rectus recessions may be preferred.[108]
Sensory exotropia
Correction of the visual deficit should be targeted first for sensory exotropia, followed by correction of the deviation. Surgery over the nondominant eye should be done first, and any residual deviations can then be corrected in the fellow eye.[109]
Pattern deviations
A “V” pattern is significant if the difference between upgaze and downgaze is greater than 15 PD. V pattern esotropia can be corrected by bilateral medial rectus recession with a downward displacement of the tendons. V pattern exotropia can be corrected by bilateral lateral rectus recessions with an upward displacement of the tendons.[58]
An “A” pattern is significant if the difference between upgaze and downgaze is greater than 10 PD. For A pattern esotropia, bilateral medial rectus recessions with upward tendon transposition are recommended. For A pattern exotropia, bilateral lateral rectus recessions with downward tendon transposition can be planned.[110]
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of strabismus depends on the pattern, onset, and characteristics of the ocular deviation (see Table. Differential Diagnosis of Strabismus). Certain conditions should be considered when evaluating common clinical presentations of strabismus.
Congenital Esotropia
Conditions that may mimic or be confused with congenital esotropia include:
Early-onset accommodative esotropia
Abducens palsy
Nystagmus blockage syndrome
Duane retraction syndrome
Sensory esotropia
Strabismus fixus
Fully Accommodative Esotropia
Conditions that may resemble or be mistaken for fully accommodative esotropia include:
Intermittent Exotropia
Conditions that may present similarly to intermittent exotropia include:
Additional conditions that may present with ocular misalignment or mimic strabismus are summarized in the table below.
Table. Differential Diagnosis of Strabismus.
VA, visual acuity; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RAPD, relative afferent pupillary defect; OCT, optical coherence tomography
Clinical Insight
Any acute-onset or incomitant strabismus should be considered neurological until proven otherwise, especially in adults and children with systemic symptoms.
Pertinent Studies and Ongoing Trials
Management of strabismus is guided by robust evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), multicenter cohort studies, and long-term outcome analyses. These studies form the foundation for current recommendations involving refractive treatment (RT), occlusion therapy, vision therapy, pharmacologic interventions, and surgery.
Refractive Treatment and Optical Correction
Multiple landmark studies have demonstrated that full cycloplegic refractive correction alone can successfully treat accommodative esotropia in a significant proportion of children. Longitudinal pediatric cohort studies have shown sustained ocular alignment and improved binocular outcomes when hyperopia is fully corrected early. These findings support RT as first-line therapy in accommodative and partially accommodative strabismus, often obviating the need for surgery.[113]
Amblyopia Treatment Studies (PEDIG Trials)
The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) has conducted several high-quality RCTs demonstrating that amblyopia treatment (patching or atropine penalization) improves visual acuity and can lead to secondary improvement in ocular alignment. These studies established evidence-based dosing regimens for patching and validated atropine as an effective alternative, reinforcing RT as an essential component of strabismus management.[114]
Vision Therapy and Orthoptic Training
Controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown that office-based vergence and accommodative therapy significantly improve outcomes in convergence insufficiency and intermittent exotropia, particularly in older children and adults. These results provide strong justification for recommending structured vision therapy as part of non-surgical RT in selected strabismus subtypes.[115]
Botulinum Toxin Trials
Prospective trials comparing botulinum toxin injection to conventional strabismus surgery have demonstrated comparable alignment outcomes in select cases, particularly infantile esotropia and acute-onset esotropia. Ongoing studies are refining dosing strategies, patient selection criteria, and long-term efficacy, supporting botulinum toxin as an evidence-based alternative or adjunct to surgery.[116]
Surgical Outcome Studies
Large, multicenter surgical outcome studies have established standardized surgical tables and dose-response relationships for horizontal and vertical muscle surgery. Recent trials have focused on adjustable sutures, minimally invasive strabismus surgery (MISS), and augmented surgical techniques, with outcomes indicating improved alignment precision and reduced reoperation rates.[117]
Ongoing and Emerging Trials
Current ongoing trials are evaluating:
Digital and home-based vision therapy platforms
AI-assisted surgical planning and outcome prediction
Neuroplasticity-based therapies for adult strabismus
Long-term binocular vision outcomes following early RT
These studies aim to refine patient-specific treatment algorithms and improve functional outcomes beyond cosmetic alignment.
Clinical Relevance
The collective evidence strongly supports early and appropriate refractive treatment (RT) as the cornerstone of strabismus management, with escalation to vision therapy, pharmacologic intervention, or surgery guided by response and strabismus subtype.[118]
Treatment Planning
Treatment planning for strabismus requires an individualized, stepwise, and etiology-driven approach, with the primary goals of achieving optimal ocular alignment, improving or preserving binocular vision, preventing amblyopia, and restoring functional and cosmetic outcomes. Planning must consider the age of onset, type and magnitude of deviation, sensory status, refractive error, comorbid neurologic or systemic disease, and patient-specific functional needs.
Initial Assessment and Goal Setting
The first step in treatment planning is defining realistic and patient-centered goals, which may include:
Development or preservation of binocular single vision (especially in children)
Prevention or treatment of amblyopia
Relief of asthenopia, diplopia, or abnormal head posture
Cosmetic alignment and psychosocial well-being
In pediatric patients, emphasis is placed on visual development and neuroplasticity, whereas in adults, treatment is often directed toward functional diplopia and quality-of-life improvement.[119]
Nonsurgical Treatment Planning
Nonsurgical interventions are typically first-line and include:
Full cycloplegic refractive correction: Particularly used in accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia
Amblyopia therapy (patching or atropine penalization): Planned before or alongside alignment strategies
Prism correction: Useful for small-angle deviations, decompensated phorias, or postoperative residual deviations
Vision therapy/orthoptics: Especially useful in convergence insufficiency, intermittent exotropia, and selected adult cases
The response to these measures is closely monitored over time, and progression to surgical planning is considered if alignment or functional goals are not met.[120]
Pharmacologic Planning
Botulinum toxin injection
Botulinum toxin therapy may be planned as:
A primary intervention in infantile or acute-onset esotropia
A temporary or diagnostic tool to assess fusion potential
An adjunct to surgery in complex or recurrent strabismus
Patient selection, dosing, and expected duration of effect are critical components of pharmacologic planning.[121]
Surgical Treatment Planning
Surgical planning is based on:
Stability and magnitude of the deviation
Presence of binocular function
Muscle involvement (horizontal, vertical, oblique)
Previous surgical history
Key surgical considerations
Choice of muscles and amount of recession/resection
Use of adjustable sutures, particularly in adults and complex cases
Timing of surgery (early surgery in infantile esotropia vs delayed intervention in intermittent deviations)
In children, surgery is often coordinated with amblyopia therapy, whereas in adults, management of diplopia and postoperative alignment goals guide planning.[56]
Long-Term Follow-Up and Replanning
Strabismus treatment planning is dynamic and requires periodic reassessment. Changes in refractive status, growth, visual development, or neurologic condition may necessitate modifications to the treatment plan. Long-term follow-up is essential to detect recurrence, overcorrection, undercorrection, or sensory adaptation.
Key Planning Principle
Successful strabismus management depends not on a single intervention, but on a well-sequenced, individualized treatment plan that integrates refractive, sensory, motor, and surgical strategies over time.[122]
Toxicity and Adverse Effect Management
Strabismus itself is not a toxic condition; however, adverse effects and toxicities may arise from its medical, pharmacologic, optical, and surgical management. Effective care requires early recognition, prevention, and prompt management of these complications to ensure patient safety and optimal visual outcomes.
Adverse Effects Related to Optical and Nonsurgical Therapy
Refractive correction and prism therapy, though generally safe, may produce transient or persistent symptoms.
Common adverse effects
Asthenopia, headaches, dizziness
Induced diplopia with prism overcorrection
Optical distortion or cosmetic concerns, resulting in poor treatment adherence
[123]
Management
Gradual prism adaptation
Reassessment of refractive error
Patient counseling and staged correction
Switching to Fresnel prisms temporarily when indicated
Amblyopia Therapy–Related Toxicity
Occlusion therapy and pharmacologic penalization may lead to visual complications if improperly monitored.[124]
Atropine penalization toxicity
Management
Use the lowest effective dose
Avoid in children with neurologic vulnerability
Educate caregivers on warning signs
Discontinue the drug immediately if systemic symptoms occur
[125]
Occlusion-related risks
Management
Botulinum Toxin–Related Adverse Effects
Botulinum toxin is increasingly used in selected cases of strabismus but carries local and systemic risks.
Common adverse effects
Rare but serious effects
Management
Proper dosing and injection technique
Use of electromyography (EMG) or imaging guidance when required
Reassurance for transient effects
Surgical correction for persistent misalignment
[127]
Surgical Complications and Their Management
Strabismus surgery is generally safe but may result in early or late adverse outcomes.
Early complications
Late complications
Management
Strict aseptic technique
Early postoperative monitoring
Adjustable sutures in adults and complex cases
Secondary surgery or prism therapy when necessary
Psychosocial and Quality-of-Life Considerations
Adverse effects are not limited to physical outcomes.
Potential issues
Management
Prevention strategies
Careful patient selection
Individualized treatment planning
Regular follow-up and outcome monitoring
Interprofessional collaboration among ophthalmologists, orthoptists, pediatricians, and neurologists
[129]
Key Clinical Pearl
Most adverse effects in strabismus management are preventable and reversible when detected early and managed proactively through vigilant follow-up and patient education.
Staging
Strabismus lacks a single universally accepted staging system; however, clinical staging is highly relevant and is routinely used in practice to guide evaluation, urgency, treatment selection, prognosis, and follow-up. Staging is generally based on age of onset, chronicity, severity of deviation, sensory adaptation, and associated neurologic or systemic findings (see Table. Clinical Staging of Strabismus).
Stage I: Latent or Intermittent Strabismus (Compensated Stage)
Definition
Clinical features
Deviation appears with fatigue, illness, or inattention
Minimal or no cosmetic concern
Preserved binocular vision and stereopsis
Lack of constant diplopia
Clinical relevance
Stage II: Manifest Strabismus without Sensory Loss (Decompensated Stage)
Definition
Clinical features
Clinical relevance
Stage III: Manifest Strabismus with Sensory Adaptation
Definition
Clinical features
Absence of diplopia despite misalignment
Reduced or absent stereopsis
Possible amblyopia (especially in children)
Stable angle of deviation
Clinical relevance
Stage IV: Strabismus with Visual or Neurologic Complications
Definition
Strabismus associated with amblyopia, neurologic disease, restrictive pathology, or paralytic causes
Clinical features
Severe or incomitant deviation
Limitation of ocular movements
Neurologic signs or systemic associations
Poor binocular potential
Clinical relevance
Special Situational Staging
Some clinical scenarios warrant functional staging:
Acute-onset strabismus (neurologic emergency until proven otherwise)
Restrictive strabismus (eg, thyroid eye disease, trauma)
Paralytic strabismus (eg, cranial nerve palsies)
Postsurgical or consecutive strabismus
[132]
Table. Clinical Staging of Strabismus.
Key Clinical Pearl
Early stages of strabismus are associated with a significantly better prognosis for recovery of binocular vision, underscoring the importance of early detection and timely intervention.
Prognosis
The prognosis of strabismus is highly variable and depends on multiple interrelated factors, including age at onset, age at diagnosis, type and severity of deviation, duration of misalignment, presence of amblyopia, binocular sensory status, underlying etiology, and timeliness of intervention (see Table. Key Prognostic Factors for Strabismus). With early recognition and appropriate management, particularly in childhood, the prognosis for ocular alignment and functional visual outcomes is generally favorable.[7] In healthy neonates, intermittent ocular deviations may occur transiently and are usually benign; however, normal binocular coordination typically develops by approximately 3 months, and persistent ocular misalignment beyond this period should be considered pathologic and warrants further evaluation.[1]
Prognosis in Children
In infantile and childhood strabismus, early diagnosis and treatment are critical. When detected within the sensitive period of visual development, outcomes are excellent for:
Achieving stable ocular alignment
Preventing or reversing amblyopia
Preserving or restoring binocular vision and stereopsis
Accommodative esotropia, when treated early with appropriate refractive correction, has one of the best prognoses, often requiring no surgical intervention. However, if strabismus is not appropriately managed during early childhood, particularly before approximately 6 to 8 years of age, amblyopia, suppression, and loss of stereopsis may develop and result in permanent reduction in visual acuity, even if ocular alignment is later corrected.[1][9]
Prognosis in Adults
In adults, the prognosis differs primarily with respect to sensory recovery. Adult-onset strabismus, particularly due to cranial nerve palsies or systemic disease, often has a favorable functional prognosis if the underlying cause is reversible or adequately managed. However, while surgical or nonsurgical treatment can reliably improve ocular alignment, cosmetic appearance, and diplopia, restoration of high-grade stereopsis is uncommon in long-standing cases.
Prognosis by Etiology
Accommodative strabismus: Excellent prognosis with early optical correction
Intermittent exotropia: Variable prognosis; early intervention improves sensory outcomes
Paralytic strabismus: Prognosis depends on nerve recovery and systemic cause
Restrictive strabismus (thyroid eye disease, trauma): Alignment improvement is likely, but multiple surgeries may be required
Sensory strabismus: Limited binocular recovery; cosmetic improvement achievable
[19]
Impact of Amblyopia
The prognosis for strabismus is significantly influenced by the presence and severity of amblyopia. Successful treatment of amblyopia before strabismus surgery improves both motor and sensory outcomes, whereas untreated amblyopia reduces the likelihood of functional binocular vision.
Long-Term Outcomes
With modern surgical techniques, optical correction, and orthoptic therapy:
Long-term alignment stability is achieved in the majority of patients.
Quality of life, psychosocial well-being, and visual comfort improve significantly.
Recurrence or residual deviation may occur and may necessitate reintervention.
[133]
Table. Key Prognostic Factors for Strabismus.
Clinical Pearl
Early detection and timely intervention remain the single most important determinants of favorable visual and functional outcomes in strabismus. Clinical features that warrant prompt ophthalmologic evaluation include persistent esotropia after early infancy, incomitant strabismus, abnormal pupillary reflexes such as leukocoria, or any constant ocular deviation.
Complications
Strabismus can result in a variety of sensory, motor, structural, and psychosocial complications that affect visual development, binocular function, and overall quality of life. Some complications arise from the underlying ocular misalignment, whereas others may occur as consequences of treatment, including surgical intervention. The major complications associated with strabismus are summarized below (see Table. Complications of Strabismus).[6]
Table. Complications of Strabismus.
Clinical Note: Early diagnosis, appropriate amblyopia therapy, precise surgical planning, and long-term follow-up are essential to minimize complications and optimize functional and cosmetic outcomes in strabismus.
Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care
Diligent postoperative and rehabilitation care following strabismus management is crucial to ensure optimal ocular alignment, restoration of binocular vision, and prevention of recurrence or sensory complications. Care begins immediately after surgery and continues through long-term follow-up, particularly in pediatric patients.[134]
Immediate Postoperative Care
Ocular hygiene and medications: Topical antibiotic–steroid combination eye drops are typically prescribed for 1 to 2 weeks to prevent infection and control inflammation. Lubricating drops may be added for comfort.
Pain and inflammation control: Mild discomfort, redness, and foreign-body sensation are common and are managed with oral analgesics, typically nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Severe pain or sudden vision loss warrants urgent evaluation.
Activity restriction: Patients are advised to avoid swimming, eye rubbing, and strenuous physical activity for at least 1 to 2 weeks.
Patch use: Routine patching is not required unless indicated for amblyopia therapy.
[135]
Early Follow-up (1–6 Weeks)
Assessment of ocular alignment: Early postoperative visits focus on evaluating alignment and motility and on detecting over- or undercorrection.
Monitoring for complications: Patients should be screened for signs of infection, slipped muscle, conjunctival granuloma, or anterior segment ischemia.
Diplopia counseling: Transient diplopia is common in adults and usually resolves; persistent diplopia may require prisms or further intervention.
[15]
Rehabilitation Phase
Amblyopia therapy: In children, patching or pharmacologic penalization of the fellow eye may be resumed or initiated to maximize visual potential.
Orthoptic exercises: Selected patients benefit from convergence exercises, fusional therapy, or vision therapy to enhance binocular function.
Prism correction: Temporary or permanent prisms may be prescribed for small residual deviations or diplopia.
Spectacle optimization: Refractive errors should be corrected to support stable alignment.
[136]
Long-Term Care and Follow-up
Monitoring for recurrence: Regular follow-up is essential, especially in growing children, as alignment may change with time.
Psychosocial support: Counseling may be beneficial for patients with long-standing strabismus to improve confidence and quality of life.
Reintervention planning: Persistent or recurrent deviations may require repeat surgery or additional nonsurgical management.
[25]
Key Point
Successful outcomes in strabismus depend not only on surgery but also on structured postoperative care, visual rehabilitation, and long-term surveillance to ensure stable alignment and optimal binocular vision.
Consultations
Effective management of strabismus requires a multidisciplinary and interprofessional approach, as the condition often intersects with neurological, pediatric, refractive, and psychosocial domains. Timely consultations improve diagnostic accuracy, guide individualized treatment planning, and optimize functional and cosmetic outcomes.[77]
Ophthalmology (Strabismus Specialist/Pediatric Ophthalmologist)
Leads diagnosis, classification, and longitudinal management
Performs detailed ocular alignment assessment, sensory testing, and surgical planning
Coordinates amblyopia therapy, optical correction, and postoperative follow-up
Determines the need for repeat surgery or adjunctive therapies
[137]
Orthoptist/Vision Therapist
Performs detailed motility measurements, binocular vision assessment, and prism adaptation testing
Provides pre- and postoperative orthoptic exercises and vision therapy
Assists in the management of amblyopia and in monitoring sensory outcomes
Neurology
Essential in cases of acute-onset strabismus, cranial nerve palsies (III, IV, VI), incomitant deviations, or associated neurological symptoms
Evaluates for intracranial pathology, neuromuscular disorders, or demyelinating disease
Guides neuroimaging and systemic work-up when indicated
[138][139]
Pediatrics
In children, assesses developmental milestones and systemic associations
Screens for syndromic conditions, prematurity-related complications, and neurodevelopmental delays
Coordinates long-term developmental and visual rehabilitation care
[139]
Endocrinology
Genetics
Considered in congenital or familial strabismus, especially when associated with syndromes (eg, Duane retraction syndrome, congenital fibrosis syndromes)
Provides genetic counseling and risk assessment for families
[141]
Psychology/Psychiatry
Anesthesiology
Rehabilitation and Low Vision Services
Key Takeaway
Strabismus management extends beyond ocular alignment; patients benefit significantly from coordinated interprofessional consultations, ensuring comprehensive care that addresses visual, neurological, systemic, and psychosocial aspects of the disease.
Deterrence and Patient Education
Deterrence and patient education are critical components in preventing complications and optimizing outcomes in patients with strabismus. Early identification and timely intervention are the most effective deterrents against long-term visual disability, particularly amblyopia and loss of binocular vision in children. Parents and caregivers should be educated to recognize early warning signs (eg, constant or intermittent eye deviation, abnormal head posture, squinting, closing one eye, poor depth perception) and to seek prompt ophthalmic evaluation rather than adopting a watchful waiting approach.[24] In cases of acute-onset strabismus, patients and caregivers should also be informed that the condition may reflect an underlying neurologic or systemic disorder and prompt referral for further evaluation may be necessary.
Patient and family education should emphasize that strabismus is not merely a cosmetic condition, but a functional visual disorder that can impact visual development, academic performance, driving ability, and psychosocial well-being. Clear counseling is required to dispel common misconceptions such as the belief that children will outgrow eye misalignment or that surgery can be indefinitely delayed without consequences. Clinicians should stress the importance of adherence to prescribed treatments including spectacles, amblyopia patching, pharmacologic penalization, or orthoptic exercises, as poor compliance is a major cause of suboptimal outcomes.[26] Families should also be informed that inadequate treatment adherence increases the risk of amblyopia and impaired stereopsis during the critical period of visual development.[77]
For patients undergoing surgical correction, education should include realistic expectations regarding outcomes, the possibility of staged procedures, the need for long-term follow-up, and the risk of recurrence or residual deviation. Postoperative instructions regarding medication use, activity restrictions, and follow-up visits should be clearly explained. Discussions with patients and families should also address the expected prognosis, potential benefits, and possible complications of treatment so that an individualized management plan can be developed collaboratively.[142] In adolescents and adults, counseling should also address psychosocial factors, including self-esteem, occupational concerns, and quality-of-life improvements following treatment.[25]
Preventive education at the community and primary care levels plays a vital role in early detection and referral, particularly through pediatricians, school vision screening programs, and public health initiatives. By empowering patients, families, and caregivers with accurate information and emphasizing the value of early and sustained treatment, healthcare providers can significantly reduce preventable visual impairment and improve long-term functional and psychosocial outcomes in strabismus.[135]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Optimizing outcomes in strabismus care requires a coordinated, interprofessional, patient-centered approach that integrates clinical expertise, effective communication, ethical practice, and shared responsibility across the healthcare team. Because strabismus often spans pediatric and adult care, involves long-term follow-up, and intersects with visual development, neurology, and psychosocial health, collaboration among multiple disciplines is essential.[19] Early identification of strabismus is a critical responsibility shared across the healthcare team, and clinicians involved in pediatric or primary care should be familiar with screening methods, risk factors, and warning signs that warrant prompt ophthalmic referral.
Physicians (particularly ophthalmologists and pediatric ophthalmologists) play a central role in diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and surgical decision-making. Their skills include accurate assessment of ocular alignment, sensory evaluation, and selection of appropriate medical, optical, or surgical interventions.[15] Ethically, physicians must ensure timely intervention to prevent amblyopia, especially in children, while balancing risks, benefits, and realistic expectations. Clear communication with patients and families regarding prognosis, treatment stages, and the need for long-term follow-up is critical for shared decision-making.[24]
Advanced practitioners (optometrists, orthoptists, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) are integral to screening, longitudinal monitoring, supervision of amblyopia therapy, and postoperative care. Orthoptists, in particular, enhance outcomes through detailed motility assessments, binocular vision evaluation, and structured orthoptic therapy. Their role in patient education and compliance reinforcement significantly improves adherence to patching, glasses, or exercise regimens.[19] Community optometrists also contribute to early detection and referral, particularly through routine vision screening and monitoring of children at risk for strabismus.
Nurses contribute to patient safety and care coordination by supporting perioperative management and educating families about medication use, patching protocols, postoperative expectations, and signs of early complications such as infection or overcorrection. Pediatric nursing support is especially valuable in addressing caregiver concerns and ensuring age-appropriate communication.[143]
Pharmacists enhance team performance by ensuring safe and effective use of medications, including cycloplegics, topical antibiotics, steroids, and anesthetic agents. They provide counseling on dosing, adverse effects, drug interactions, and adherence, particularly in children and older adults.[144]
Other health professionals, including vision therapists, psychologists, and social workers, address the functional and psychosocial dimensions of strabismus. Vision therapists support selected cases with binocular rehabilitation, while psychologists and counselors help manage self-esteem challenges, social anxiety, and quality-of-life concerns, especially in adolescents and adults with long-standing strabismus. Teachers and school health personnel may also assist in identifying children with suspected ocular misalignment and facilitating referral for ophthalmic evaluation.[6]
Effective interprofessional communication and care coordination through shared documentation, structured referrals, and multidisciplinary discussions ensure continuity of care across developmental stages and treatment phases. Maintaining detailed and accessible medical and orthoptic records helps facilitate coordinated management during clinic visits, surgical planning, and follow-up care, while communication between ophthalmologists and primary care clinicians supports comprehensive longitudinal care.[145] By aligning skills, responsibilities, and ethical priorities, the healthcare team can deliver safer, more effective, and patient-centered strabismus care, ultimately improving visual outcomes, functional vision, and overall quality of life.[13][146]
Strabismus Surgery. The medial rectus muscle is being disinserted following pre-placement of polyglactin 910 sutures. A Castroviejo locking forceps grasps the superior pole of the muscle, while a Manson-Aebli scissors does the cutting. A Cook speculum (more...)
Strabismus. Clinical photograph demonstrating ocular misalignment with one eye deviated from the visual axis while the fellow eye maintains fixation. Contributed by S Bhimji, MD
Epidemiology of Strabismus. Infographic illustrating the global prevalence, age distribution, sex patterns, familial risk, associated risk factors, and potential consequences of untreated strabismus across different populations. Contributed by K Kaur, (more...)
Etiology of Strabismus. Infographic illustrating the major etiologic categories of strabismus, including congenital or developmental, refractive, sensory, neurological, mechanical or restrictive, and systemic or genetic causes, all of which can disrupt (more...)
Etiologic Pathways in Strabismus. Flowchart illustrating how disruption of normal binocular vision due to factors such as abnormal visual input, excessive accommodation, defective neural control, or developmental immaturity leads to failure of sensory (more...)
Toxicokinetic Pathway Leading to Acquired Strabismus. Flowchart illustrating how exposure to drugs, toxins, or metabolic insults progresses through absorption and systemic distribution to affect ocular motor pathways, leading to neuromuscular (more...)
References
- 1.
Helveston EM. Understanding, detecting, and managing strabismus.
Community Eye Health. 2010 Mar;23(72):12-4. [
PMC free article: PMC2873668] [
PubMed: 20523857]
- 2.
Clarke WN. Common types of strabismus.
Paediatr Child Health. 1999 Nov;4(8):533-5. [
PMC free article: PMC2830773] [
PubMed: 20213000]
- 3.
Bui Quoc E, Milleret C. Origins of strabismus and loss of binocular vision.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2014;8:71. [
PMC free article: PMC4174748] [
PubMed: 25309358]
- 4.
Rowe FJ, Noonan CP. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of strabismus.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 02;3(3):CD006499. [
PMC free article: PMC6464099] [
PubMed: 28253424]
- 5.
Qanat AS, Alsuheili A, Alzahrani AM, Faydhi AA, Albadri A, Alhibshi N. Assessment of Different Types of Strabismus Among Pediatric Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Jeddah.
Cureus. 2020 Dec 08;12(12):e11978. [
PMC free article: PMC7790318] [
PubMed: 33425550]
- 6.
Alwazae M, Alhaimi F. Isolated Idiopathic Inferior Rectus Palsy: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2026 Jan-Dec;17(1):32-37. [
PMC free article: PMC12788840] [
PubMed: 41524031]
- 7.
Zhang YH, Guo Y, Zhang SJ, Zhao C. A bibliometric analysis of publication trends in strabismus over the past 30y.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2026;19(1):149-159. [
PMC free article: PMC12782059] [
PubMed: 41524004]
- 8.
Calderón-González MT, Sánchez-Pavón I, Portela-Camino JA, Martín-González S. Effects of Perceptual Learning Through Binocular Virtual Reality Exercises on Low Stereopsis.
J Clin Med. 2025 Dec 19;15(1) [
PMC free article: PMC12786880] [
PubMed: 41517256]
- 9.
Akbari MR, Masoomian B, Mirmohammadsadeghi A, Azizi E, Hussain HR, Khorrami-Nejad M. Preoperative factors associated with multiple strabismus surgeries in basic exotropia.
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2026 Jan-Dec;18:25158414251407867. [
PMC free article: PMC12775299] [
PubMed: 41509816]
- 10.
Quinodoz M, Rodenburg K, Cvackova Z, Kaminska K, de Bruijn SE, Iglesias-Romero AB, Boonen EGM, Ullah M, Zomer N, Folcher M, Bijon J, Holtes LK, Tsang SH, Corradi Z, Freund KB, Shliaga S, Panneman DM, Hitti-Malin RJ, Ali M, AlTalbishi A, Andréasson S, Ansari G, Arno G, Astuti GDN, Ayuso C, Ayyagari R, Banfi S, Banin E, Barakat TS, Barboni MTS, Bauwens M, Ben-Yosef T, Bernard V, Birch DG, Biswas P, Blanco-Kelly F, Bocquet B, Boon CJF, Branham K, Bremond-Gignac D, Britten-Jones AC, Bujakowska KM, Burin des Roziers C, Cadena EL, Calzetti G, Cancellieri F, Cattaneo L, Chadderton N, Charbel Issa P, Coutinho-Santos L, Daiger SP, De Baere E, De Bruyne M, de la Cerda B, De Roach JN, De Zaeytijd J, Derks R, Dhaenens CM, Dudakova L, Duncan JL, Farrar GJ, Feltgen N, Fenner BJ, Fernández-Caballero L, Ferraz Sallum JM, Gana S, Garanto A, Gardner JC, Gilissen C, Gonzàlez-Duarte R, Goto K, Griffiths-Jones S, Haack TB, Haer-Wigman L, Hardcastle AJ, Hayashi T, Héon E, Hoefsloot LH, Hoischen A, Holtan JP, Hoyng CB, Ibanez MBB, Inglehearn CF, Iwata T, Jensson BO, Jones K, Kalatzis V, Kamakari S, Karali M, Kellner U, Klaver CCW, Knézy K, Koenekoop RK, Kohl S, Kominami T, Kühlewein L, Lamey TM, Leibu R, Leroy BP, Liskova P, Lopez I, López-Rodríguez VRJ, Mahieu Q, Mahroo OA, Manes G, Mansard L, Martín-Gutiérrez MP, Martins N, Mauring L, McKibbin M, McLaren TL, Meunier I, Michaelides M, Millán JM, Mizobuchi K, Mukherjee R, Nagy ZZ, Neveling K, Ołdak M, Oorsprong M, Pan Y, Papachristou A, Percesepe A, Pfau M, Pierce EA, Place E, Ramesar R, Ramond F, Rasquin FA, Rice GI, Roberts L, Rodríguez-Hidalgo M, Ruiz-Ederra J, Sabir AH, Sajiki AF, Sánchez-Barbero AI, Sarma AS, Sangermano R, Santos CM, Scarpato M, Scholl HPN, Sharon D, Signorini SG, Simonelli F, Sousa AB, Stefaniotou M, Stefansson K, Stingl K, Suga A, Sulem P, Sullivan LS, Szabó V, Szaflik JP, Taurina G, Thiadens AAHJ, Toomes C, Tran VH, Tsilimbaris MK, Tsoka P, Vaclavik V, Vajter M, Valeina S, Valente EM, Valentine C, Valero R, Valleix S, van Aerschot J, van den Born LI, Van Heetvelde M, Verhoeven VJM, Vincent AL, Webster AR, Whelan L, Wissinger B, Yioti GG, Yoshitake K, Zenteno JC, Zeuli R, Zuleger T, Landau C, Jacob AI, Lin S, Cremers FPM, Lee W, Ellingford JM, Stanek D, Roosing S, Rivolta C. De novo and inherited dominant variants in U4 and U6 snRNA genes cause retinitis pigmentosa.
Nat Genet. 2026 Jan;58(1):169-179. [
PMC free article: PMC12807869] [
PubMed: 41513982]
- 11.
Zhao J, Gong Q, Jiang Y, Han J, Zhu X, Li M, Lu F, Hu L. Systemic and ocular associated factors for pathologic myopia in a highly myopic Chinese population: findings from the Wenzhou pathologic myopia study.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2026 Jan 08; [
PubMed: 41506847]
- 12.
Machairoudia G, Venkataraman A, Löbel U, Gaur P, Bryant V, Cottom H, Duncan C, Chowdhury T, Sagoo MS, Reddy MA, Negretti GS. Intraocular Medulloepithelioma: A Rare but Important Mimicker of Retinoblastoma.
Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2026 Mar;12(1):32-39. [
PMC free article: PMC12782631] [
PubMed: 41521974]
- 13.
Picha DY, Joshi RS, Gogate PM, Ingle R, Garge V, Jain R, Acharya A. Burden of ocular morbidities among school-going children in Central India.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2026 Apr 01;74(4):530-536. [
PMC free article: PMC13056060] [
PubMed: 41498317]
- 14.
Susvar P, Shakeel A, Karra A, Gopal L, Bhende P. Scleral buckling in stage 4A/B retinopathy of prematurity: A retrospective analysis of 105 eyes.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2026 Jun 01;74(6):921-926. [
PMC free article: PMC13271555] [
PubMed: 41498314]
- 15.
Lin CW, Chen CY, Wu PL, Chen CL, Lai CH. Assessing GPT-4o and GPT-4 in answering and explaining ophthalmology examination questions from Taiwan's medical licensing test.
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2025 Oct-Dec;15(4):647-654. [
PMC free article: PMC12782525] [
PubMed: 41523118]
- 16.
Jenkins RH. Short and Long Term Effects of Teprotumumab on Diplopia and Strabismus Associated with Thyroid Eye Disease.
J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2025 Apr-Jun;75(2):37-46. [
PubMed: 41503929]
- 17.
Khan AO. A Modern Approach to Incomitant Strabismus.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Sep;22(3):263-4. [
PMC free article: PMC4502166] [
PubMed: 26180461]
- 18.
Chen AH, Aziz A. Heterophoria in young adults with emmetropia and myopia.
Malays J Med Sci. 2003 Jan;10(1):90-4. [
PMC free article: PMC3557116] [
PubMed: 23365507]
- 19.
Alzaben KA, Albakri A, Alshabeeb RS, Almontashiri N, Abu-Amero KK, Alzendi NA. Ophthalmic phenotype associated with a novel mutation in
LAMB3 gene linked to uncommon Intermediate Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2026 Mar;41:102498. [
PMC free article: PMC12765158] [
PubMed: 41492568]
- 20.
Kim IG, Park JM, Lee SJ. Factors associated with the direction of ocular deviation in sensory horizontal strabismus and unilateral organic ocular problems.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;26(3):199-202. [
PMC free article: PMC3364432] [
PubMed: 22670077]
- 21.
Ezra Kahtan B, Azmon R, Hendler K, Yahalom C. ANTI-VEGF THERAPY SWITCHING RETINAL DISEASES: Characterizing Clinical Manifestations and Common Involved Genes.
Retina. 2026 May 01;46(5):934-940. [
PubMed: 41490227]
- 22.
Lueder GT. Orbital Causes of Incomitant Strabismus.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Sep;22(3):286-91. [
PMC free article: PMC4502170] [
PubMed: 26180465]
- 23.
McDermott CJ, Shaw PJ. Diagnosis and management of motor neurone disease.
BMJ. 2008 Mar 22;336(7645):658-62. [
PMC free article: PMC2270983] [
PubMed: 18356234]
- 24.
Hayashi S, Watanabe A, Iida K, Kuwano K, Nakano T. Neurosyphilis Diagnosed on the Basis of Pupillary Abnormalities: A Case Report.
Cureus. 2025 Dec;17(12):e98375. [
PMC free article: PMC12764290] [
PubMed: 41487763]
- 25.
Yamamoto A, Miyata M, Nakao S, Suda K, Ito M, Nakano E, Tagawa M, Tsujikawa A. Effectiveness of the long-term prism adaptation test over 1 month or more in strabismus surgery for esotropia.
Sci Rep. 2026 Jan 04;16(1):4478. [
PMC free article: PMC12865029] [
PubMed: 41486182]
- 26.
Mahfooz S, Rahman S, Asma Zafrullah T, Saha R, Malek MA. Factitious Conjunctivitis: A Great Imposter With Compelling Evidence.
Cureus. 2025 Nov;17(11):e98147. [
PMC free article: PMC12754825] [
PubMed: 41479482]
- 27.
Laughton SC, Hagen MM, Yang W, von Bartheld CS. Gender differences in horizontal strabismus: Systematic review and meta-analysis shows no difference in prevalence, but gender bias towards females in the clinic.
J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 01;13:04085. [
PMC free article: PMC10471156] [
PubMed: 37651634]
- 28.
Hashemi H, Pakzad R, Heydarian S, Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, Shokrollahzadeh F, Khoshhal F, Pakbin M, Ramin S, Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional prevalence of strabismus: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
Strabismus. 2019 Jun;27(2):54-65. [
PubMed: 31012389]
- 29.
Gulati S, Andrews CA, Apkarian AO, Musch DC, Lee PP, Stein JD. Effect of gestational age and birth weight on the risk of strabismus among premature infants.
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Sep;168(9):850-6. [
PMC free article: PMC4339677] [
PubMed: 25048624]
- 30.
Mason A, Joronen K, Lindberg L, Kajander M, Fagerholm N, Rantanen A. Strabismic Adults' Experiences of Psychosocial Influence of Strabismus-A Qualitative Study.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Jan-Dec;10:23779608241278456. [
PMC free article: PMC11378177] [
PubMed: 39246297]
- 31.
Lennerstrand G. Strabismus and eye muscle function.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Nov;85(7):711-23. [
PubMed: 17944625]
- 32.
Levi DM. Rethinking amblyopia 2020.
Vision Res. 2020 Nov;176:118-129. [
PMC free article: PMC7487000] [
PubMed: 32866759]
- 33.
Norcia AM. Abnormal motion processing and binocularity: infantile esotropia as a model system for effects of early interruptions of binocularity.
Eye (Lond). 1996;10 ( Pt 2):259-65. [
PubMed: 8776457]
- 34.
Babinsky E, Candy TR. Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jul 24;54(7):4941-55. [
PMC free article: PMC3723374] [
PubMed: 23883788]
- 35.
Khorrami-Nejad M, Alghurab A, Akbari MR, Azizi E, Masoomian B. Sensory Strabismus; A Literature Review.
J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2024 Jan-Mar;74(1):32-40. [
PubMed: 38421248]
- 36.
Prasad S, Volpe NJ. Paralytic strabismus: third, fourth, and sixth nerve palsy.
Neurol Clin. 2010 Aug;28(3):803-33. [
PubMed: 20638001]
- 37.
Sunyer-Grau B, Quevedo L, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Argilés M. Comitant strabismus etiology: extraocular muscle integrity and central nervous system involvement-a narrative review.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;261(7):1781-1792. [
PMC free article: PMC10271888] [
PubMed: 36680614]
- 38.
Kaur K, Gurnani B.
StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Dec 30, 2025. Intermittent Exotropia. [
PubMed: 34662028]
- 39.
Gómez-Mariscal M, Hernández-Martínez P, Rodríguez-Del Valle JM, Ruiz-Guerrero M, Márquez-González C, Rodríguez-Sánchez JM. Consecutive strabismus after infantile nystagmus syndrome surgery and potential risk factors.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;258(7):1549-1554. [
PubMed: 32307586]
- 40.
Sanchez MM, Whitman MC. Genetics of strabismus.
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2023;3 [
PMC free article: PMC10947184] [
PubMed: 38500555]
- 41.
Murray AD. An Approach to Some Aspects of Strabismus from Ocular and Orbital Trauma.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Sep;22(3):312-9. [
PMC free article: PMC4502174] [
PubMed: 26180469]
- 42.
Büttner-Ennever JA, Horn AK, Scherberger H, D'Ascanio P. Motoneurons of twitch and nontwitch extraocular muscle fibers in the abducens, trochlear, and oculomotor nuclei of monkeys.
J Comp Neurol. 2001 Sep 24;438(3):318-35. [
PubMed: 11550175]
- 43.
Al-Falki Y, Al-Shraim M, Alsabaani NA, Eid RA, Radad K. Ultrastructural changes of extraocular muscles in strabismus patients.
Ultrastruct Pathol. 2019;43(4-5):145-153. [
PubMed: 31570030]
- 44.
Vemula S, Osman A, Yang X, Aronchik G, Martinez Sanchez M, Meher N, Whitman MC. Disrupted Motor Neuron and Neuromuscular Junction Development in an Albino Mice Model of Infantile Nystagmus.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jul 01;66(9):25. [
PMC free article: PMC12255187] [
PubMed: 40637510]
- 45.
Wight TN, Potter-Perigo S. The extracellular matrix: an active or passive player in fibrosis?
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011 Dec;301(6):G950-5. [
PMC free article: PMC3233785] [
PubMed: 21512158]
- 46.
Chen L, Deng H, Cui H, Fang J, Zuo Z, Deng J, Li Y, Wang X, Zhao L. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs.
Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 23;9(6):7204-7218. [
PMC free article: PMC5805548] [
PubMed: 29467962]
- 47.
Bui MT, Fernández-Eulate G, Evangelista T, Lacène E, Brochier G, Labasse C, Madelaine A, Chanut A, Beuvin M, Borsato-Levy F, Biancalana V, Barcia G, De Lonlay P, Laporte J, Böhm J, Romero NB. Relevance of muscle biopsies in the neonatal and early infantile period: a 52 years retrospective study in the gene-sequencing era.
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2024 Dec 20;12(1):191. [
PMC free article: PMC11662432] [
PubMed: 39707553]
- 48.
Crouch ER. Use of botulinum toxin in strabismus.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;17(5):435-40. [
PubMed: 16932060]
- 49.
Monash A, Tam J, Rosen O, Soreq H. Botulinum Neurotoxins: History, Mechanism, and Applications. A Narrative Review.
J Neurochem. 2025 Aug;169(8):e70187. [
PMC free article: PMC12323300] [
PubMed: 40762356]
- 50.
Ramanathan R, Patwa SA, Ali AH, Ibdah JA. Thyroid Hormone and Mitochondrial Dysfunction: Therapeutic Implications for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD).
Cells. 2023 Dec 09;12(24) [
PMC free article: PMC10741470] [
PubMed: 38132126]
- 51.
Wiggins RE, von Noorden GK. Monocular eye closure in sunlight.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1990 Jan-Feb;27(1):16-20; discussion 21-2. [
PubMed: 2324913]
- 52.
Ring J. History of Allergy: Clinical Descriptions, Pathophysiology, and Treatment.
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2022;268:3-19. [
PubMed: 34424388]
- 53.
Pensiero S, Diplotti L, Presotto M, Ronfani L, Barbi E. Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience.
Front Pediatr. 2021;9:695841. [
PMC free article: PMC8342806] [
PubMed: 34368027]
- 54.
Lembo A, Serafino M, Strologo MD, Saunders RA, Trivedi RH, Villani E, Nucci P. Accommodative esotropia: the state of the art.
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;39(2):497-505. [
PubMed: 29332227]
- 55.
Houston CA, Cleary M, Dutton GN, McFadzean RM. Clinical characteristics of microtropia--is microtropia a fixed phenomenon?
Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Mar;82(3):219-24. [
PMC free article: PMC1722512] [
PubMed: 9602615]
- 56.
Mravicic I, Gulic MP, Barisic A, Biscevic A, Pjano MA, Pidro A. Different Surgical Approaches for Treatment of Dissociated Vertical Deviation (DVD).
Med Arch. 2019 Dec;73(6):386-390. [
PMC free article: PMC7007610] [
PubMed: 32082005]
- 57.
Bagheri A, Sahebghalam R, Abrishami M. Double elevator palsy, subtypes and outcomes of surgery.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2008 Apr;3(2):108-13. [
PMC free article: PMC3589222] [
PubMed: 23479532]
- 58.
Gantz L, Millodot M, Roth GL. Analysis of Alphabet Patterns of Deviations Found in Patients Without Strabismus in Primary Position.
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2020;12:49-56. [
PMC free article: PMC7094002] [
PubMed: 32256138]
- 59.
Kekunnaya R, Negalur M. Duane retraction syndrome: causes, effects and management strategies.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1917-1930. [
PMC free article: PMC5669793] [
PubMed: 29133973]
- 60.
Koc AA, Aygit ED, Inal A, Ocak B, Gurez C, Ahmet S, Duman B, Gokyigit B. Brown Syndrome: Features and Long-term Results of Management.
Beyoglu Eye J. 2021;6(3):223-228. [
PMC free article: PMC8697048] [
PubMed: 35005520]
- 61.
Picciolini O, Porro M, Cattaneo E, Castelletti S, Masera G, Mosca F, Bedeschi MF. Moebius syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, management and early intervention.
Ital J Pediatr. 2016 Jun 03;42(1):56. [
PMC free article: PMC4893276] [
PubMed: 27260152]
- 62.
Kanazawa T, Hino U, Kuramae T, Ishihara M. Idiopathic unilateral oculomotor nerve palsy: A case report.
Heliyon. 2020 Dec;6(12):e05651. [
PMC free article: PMC7718458] [
PubMed: 33305057]
- 63.
Azarmina M, Azarmina H. The six syndromes of the sixth cranial nerve.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013 Apr;8(2):160-71. [
PMC free article: PMC3740468] [
PubMed: 23943691]
- 64.
Bixenman WW. Diagnosis of superior oblique palsy.
J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1981 Sep;1(3):199-208. [
PubMed: 6213662]
- 65.
Wong AM. Understanding skew deviation and a new clinical test to differentiate it from trochlear nerve palsy.
J AAPOS. 2010 Feb;14(1):61-7. [
PMC free article: PMC5154745] [
PubMed: 20227626]
- 66.
Jain S. Diplopia: Diagnosis and management.
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Mar;22(2):104-106. [
PMC free article: PMC8966821] [
PubMed: 35304368]
- 67.
Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Manning KA. Measuring visual acuity in infants.
Surv Ophthalmol. 1981 Mar-Apr;25(5):325-32. [
PubMed: 7221878]
- 68.
Salley B, Brady NC, Hoffman L, Fleming K. Preverbal Communication Complexity in Infants.
Infancy. 2020 Jan-Feb;25(1):4-21. [
PMC free article: PMC7055680] [
PubMed: 32132879]
- 69.
Salati R, Schiavulli O, Giammari G, Borgatti R. Checklist for the evaluation of low vision in uncooperative patients.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2001 Mar-Apr;38(2):90-4. [
PubMed: 11310713]
- 70.
Paul CM, Sathyan S. Comparison of the efficacy of Lea Symbol chart and Sheridan Gardiner chart for preschool vision screening.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;66(7):924-928. [
PMC free article: PMC6032748] [
PubMed: 29941732]
- 71.
Gautam Adhikari P, Shah S, Bhatta N, Mandal P, Sharma Paudel B, Pokhrel A, Koirala B, Shah CP. Stereoacuity among Undergraduate Medical and Nursing Students at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Jan 15;60(245):54-58. [
PMC free article: PMC9157671] [
PubMed: 35199674]
- 72.
Kraft SP, O'Donoghue EP, Roarty JD. Improvement of compensatory head postures after strabismus surgery.
Ophthalmology. 1992 Aug;99(8):1301-8. [
PubMed: 1513584]
- 73.
Mutti DO, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. AC/A ratio, age, and refractive error in children.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Aug;41(9):2469-78. [
PubMed: 10937556]
- 74.
Garcia SSS, Santiago APD, Directo PMC. Evaluation of a Hirschberg Test-Based Application for Measuring Ocular Alignment and Detecting Strabismus.
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Nov;46(11):1768-1776. [
PubMed: 33856941]
- 75.
Sethi H, Naik M, Joshi M. Modified Krimsky test for irregular scarred corneas.
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;37(5):1243-1245. [
PubMed: 27826935]
- 76.
Mestre C, Otero C, Díaz-Doutón F, Gautier J, Pujol J. An automated and objective cover test to measure heterophoria.
PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206674. [
PMC free article: PMC6211723] [
PubMed: 30383846]
- 77.
Hull S, Tailor V, Balduzzi S, Rahi J, Schmucker C, Virgili G, Dahlmann-Noor A. Tests for detecting strabismus in children aged 1 to 6 years in the community.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 06;11(11):CD011221. [
PMC free article: PMC6486041] [
PubMed: 29105728]
- 78.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Interobserver reliability of the prism and alternate cover test in children with esotropia.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;127(1):59-65. [
PMC free article: PMC2629143] [
PubMed: 19139339]
- 79.
Holmes JM, Leske DA, Hohberger GG. Defining real change in prism-cover test measurements.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):381-5. [
PMC free article: PMC2386860] [
PubMed: 18045567]
- 80.
Pointer JS. An enhancement to the Maddox Wing test for the reliable measurement of horizontal heterophoria.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 Sep;25(5):446-51. [
PubMed: 16101952]
- 81.
Dolman P. The Maddox Rod Screen Test.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1919;17:235-49. [
PMC free article: PMC1318186] [
PubMed: 16692471]
- 82.
Honglertnapakul W, Praneeprachachon P, Pukrushpan P. Normal Range of Ocular Ductions in Various Age Brackets by Prism Shifting Light-Reflex Test.
J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2020 Apr-Jun;70(2):47-52. [
PubMed: 31951789]
- 83.
Jarwick LCJ, Taylor K, Connor AJ, Fieldsend CS. Postoperative diplopia test-repeatability and prediction of surgical outcomes.
J AAPOS. 2022 Oct;26(5):252.e1-252.e5. [
PubMed: 36156298]
- 84.
Kouri AS, Bessant DA, Adams GG, Sloper JJ, Lee JP. Quantitative changes in the field of binocular single vision following a fadenoperation to a vertical rectus muscle.
J AAPOS. 2002 Oct;6(5):294-9. [
PubMed: 12381988]
- 85.
Roper-Hall G. The hess screen test.
Am Orthopt J. 2006;56:166-74. [
PubMed: 21149145]
- 86.
Chang JW. Refractive error change and vision improvement in moderate to severe hyperopic amblyopia after spectacle correction: Restarting the emmetropization process?
PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175780. [
PMC free article: PMC5397024] [
PubMed: 28423020]
- 87.
Kim S, Yang HK, Hwang JM. Surgical outcomes of unilateral recession and resection in intermittent exotropia according to forced duction test results.
PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200741. [
PMC free article: PMC6061974] [
PubMed: 30048470]
- 88.
Lee JE, Yang HK, Kim JH, Hwang JM. Diagnostic Utility of the Three-Step Test According to the Presence of the Trochlear Nerve in Superior Oblique Palsy.
J Clin Neurol. 2018 Jan;14(1):66-72. [
PMC free article: PMC5765258] [
PubMed: 29629542]
- 89.
Corr RH. Fundoscopy in the smartphone age: current ophthalmoscopy methods in neurology.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2023 May;81(5):502-509. [
PMC free article: PMC10232018] [
PubMed: 37257471]
- 90.
Frantz KA, Cotter SA, Wick B. Re-evaluation of the four prism diopter base-out test.
Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Oct;69(10):777-86. [
PubMed: 1436999]
- 91.
Herzau V, Schoser G. [The value of the prism adaptation test in determining the degree of squint surgery].
Ophthalmologe. 1993 Feb;90(1):11-6. [
PubMed: 8443441]
- 92.
Horwood A. Neonatal ocular misalignments reflect vergence development but rarely become esotropia.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Sep;87(9):1146-50. [
PMC free article: PMC1771854] [
PubMed: 12928285]
- 93.
Lavrich JB. Intermittent exotropia: continued controversies and current management.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;26(5):375-81. [
PubMed: 26204476]
- 94.
Writing Committee for the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Cotter SA, Foster NC, Holmes JM, Melia BM, Wallace DK, Repka MX, Tamkins SM, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Hoover DL, Crouch ER, Miller AM, Morse CL, Suh DW. Optical treatment of strabismic and combined strabismic-anisometropic amblyopia.
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jan;119(1):150-8. [
PMC free article: PMC3250558] [
PubMed: 21959371]
- 95.
Repka MX, Kraker RT, Holmes JM, Summers AI, Glaser SR, Barnhardt CN, Tien DR., Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at 15 years of age of a randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;132(7):799-805. [
PMC free article: PMC4206086] [
PubMed: 24789375]
- 96.
Osborne DC, Greenhalgh KM, Evans MJE, Self JE. Atropine Penalization Versus Occlusion Therapies for Unilateral Amblyopia after the Critical Period of Visual Development: A Systematic Review.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):323-332. [
PMC free article: PMC6258585] [
PubMed: 30328078]
- 97.
Gray LS. The prescribing of prisms in clinical practice.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 May;246(5):627-9. [
PMC free article: PMC2292476] [
PubMed: 18379815]
- 98.
Hiatt RL, Ringer C, Cope-Troupe C. Miotics vs glasses in esodeviation.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1979 Jul-Aug;16(4):213-7. [
PubMed: 490272]
- 99.
Ozkan SB, Topaloğlu A, Aydin S. The role of botulinum toxin A in augmentation of the effect of recession and/or resection surgery.
J AAPOS. 2006 Apr;10(2):124-7. [
PubMed: 16678746]
- 100.
Jampolsky A, von Noorden GK, Spiritus M. Unnecessary surgery in fully refractive accommodative esotropia.
Int Ophthalmol. 1992 Mar;16(2):129-30; discussion 130-1. [
PubMed: 1587696]
- 101.
Ing MR, Okino LM. Outcome study of stereopsis in relation to duration of misalignment in congenital esotropia.
J AAPOS. 2002 Feb;6(1):3-8. [
PubMed: 11907472]
- 102.
Leske DA, Holmes JM. Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis.
J AAPOS. 2004 Feb;8(1):28-34. [
PubMed: 14970796]
- 103.
Kampanartsanyakorn S, Surachatkumtonekul T, Dulayajinda D, Jumroendararasmee M, Tongsae S. The outcomes of horizontal strabismus surgery and influencing factors of the surgical success.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Nov;88 Suppl 9:S94-9. [
PubMed: 16681059]
- 104.
Repka MX, Lum F, Burugapalli B. Strabismus, Strabismus Surgery, and Reoperation Rate in the United States: Analysis from the IRIS Registry.
Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1646-1653. [
PubMed: 29779683]
- 105.
Kaur K, Gurnani B.
StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jun 11, 2023. Esotropia. [
PubMed: 35201735]
- 106.
Kim WK, Kang SY, Rhiu S, Chung SA, Lee JB. The analysis of AC/A ratio in nonrefractive accommodative esotropia treated with bifocal glasses.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;26(1):39-44. [
PMC free article: PMC3268167] [
PubMed: 22323884]
- 107.
Suh SY, Kim MJ, Choi J, Kim SJ. Outcomes of surgery in children with early-onset exotropia.
Eye (Lond). 2013 Jul;27(7):836-40. [
PMC free article: PMC3709395] [
PubMed: 23619215]
- 108.
Hatt SR, Gnanaraj L. Interventions for intermittent exotropia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD003737. [
PMC free article: PMC4307390] [
PubMed: 23728647]
- 109.
Lou DH, Xu YS, Li YM. Sensory exotropia subsequent to senile cataract.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2005 Dec;6(12):1220-2. [
PMC free article: PMC1390648] [
PubMed: 16358383]
- 110.
Kekunnaya R, Mendonca T, Sachdeva V. Pattern strabismus and torsion needs special surgical attention.
Eye (Lond). 2015 Feb;29(2):184-90. [
PMC free article: PMC4330283] [
PubMed: 25412718]
- 111.
Nelson LB, Wagner RS, Simon JW, Harley RD. Congenital esotropia.
Surv Ophthalmol. 1987 May-Jun;31(6):363-83. [
PubMed: 3303394]
- 112.
Mulvihill A, MacCann A, Flitcroft I, O'Keefe M. Outcome in refractive accommodative esotropia.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jul;84(7):746-9. [
PMC free article: PMC1723536] [
PubMed: 10873987]
- 113.
JAMPOLSKY A. The management of strabismus.
Calif Med. 1953 Nov;79(5):367-9. [
PMC free article: PMC1521913] [
PubMed: 13106713]
- 114.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Repka MX, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Cotter SA, Birch EE, Astle WF, Chandler DL, Felius J, Arnold RW, Tien DR, Glaser SR. A randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at age 10 years.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;126(8):1039-44. [
PMC free article: PMC2614351] [
PubMed: 18695096]
- 115.
Ma MM, Kang Y, Scheiman M, Chen X. Office-based Vergence and Accommodative Therapy for the Treatment of Intermittent Exotropia: A Pilot Study.
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Dec;96(12):925-933. [
PubMed: 31834152]
- 116.
Yigit DD, Kockar A, Gurez C, Inal A, Gokyigit B. A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes for Infantile Esotropia With and Without Prior Botulinum Toxin A Injection.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024 Jul-Aug;61(4):245-251. [
PubMed: 38380936]
- 117.
Heidary G, Aakalu VK, Binenbaum G, Chang MY, Morrison DG, VanderVeen DK, Lambert SR, Trivedi RH, Galvin JA, Pineles SL. Adjustable Sutures in the Treatment of Strabismus: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Ophthalmology. 2022 Jan;129(1):100-109. [
PMC free article: PMC10187043] [
PubMed: 34446304]
- 118.
Wu D, Huang X, Chen L, Hou P, Liu L, Yang G. Integrating artificial intelligence in strabismus management: current research landscape and future directions.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2024;249:10320. [
PMC free article: PMC11625544] [
PubMed: 39654660]
- 119.
Sprunger DT, Lambert SR, Hercinovic A, Morse CL, Repka MX, Hutchinson AK, Cruz OA, Wallace DK., American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Panel. Esotropia and Exotropia Preferred Practice Pattern®.
Ophthalmology. 2023 Mar;130(3):P179-P221. [
PMC free article: PMC10655158] [
PubMed: 36526451]
- 120.
Sen S, Singh P, Saxena R. Management of amblyopia in pediatric patients: Current insights.
Eye (Lond). 2022 Jan;36(1):44-56. [
PMC free article: PMC8727565] [
PubMed: 34234293]
- 121.
Alam M, Alshammari S, Alobaisi S, Alfreihi S. Evaluation of the efficacy of botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of infantile esotropia.
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr-Jun;37(2):107-110. [
PMC free article: PMC10365242] [
PubMed: 37492208]
- 122.
Peragallo JH, Velez FG, Demer JL, Pineles SL. Long-term follow-up of strabismus surgery for patients with ocular myasthenia gravis.
J Neuroophthalmol. 2013 Mar;33(1):40-4. [
PMC free article: PMC3607423] [
PubMed: 23403387]
- 123.
Kaur K, Gurnani B.
StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Nov 7, 2025. Dissociated Vertical Deviation. [
PubMed: 34424634]
- 124.
Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Stephens DA., MOTAS Cooperative. Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;88(12):1552-6. [
PMC free article: PMC1772452] [
PubMed: 15548811]
- 125.
Hou P, Wu D, Nie Y, Wei H, Liu L, Yang G. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different doses of atropine for myopic control in children: a meta-analysis.
Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1227787. [
PMC free article: PMC10520549] [
PubMed: 37767401]
- 126.
Handa T, Thakkar H, Ramakrishnan M, Shah K, Prajapati V, Sayed S, Joshi A, Ishigaki Y. Comparison of the effectiveness of amblyopia treatment with eye-patch and binocular Occlu-tab for the same treatment duration.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;70(5):1722-1726. [
PMC free article: PMC9332975] [
PubMed: 35502060]
- 127.
Witmanowski H, Błochowiak K. The whole truth about botulinum toxin - a review.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2020 Dec;37(6):853-861. [
PMC free article: PMC7874868] [
PubMed: 33603602]
- 128.
Olitsky SE, Coats DK. Complications of Strabismus Surgery.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Sep;22(3):271-8. [
PMC free article: PMC4502168] [
PubMed: 26180463]
- 129.
Pinto A, Faiz O, Davis R, Almoudaris A, Vincent C. Surgical complications and their impact on patients' psychosocial well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 16;6(2):e007224. [
PMC free article: PMC4762142] [
PubMed: 26883234]
- 130.
Wu H, Liu H. Analysis of Strabismus Surgical Outcomes: A Retrospective Study of 2269 Cases from a Single Center.
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jul 21;31:e947601. [
PMC free article: PMC12291608] [
PubMed: 40685635]
- 131.
Kassem IS, Miller MT, Archer SM. One Year of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Research in Review.
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2013 Nov-Dec;2(6):388-400. [
PMC free article: PMC6839686] [
PubMed: 26107151]
- 132.
Al Qahtani ES, Rootman J, Kersey J, Godoy F, Lyons CJ. Clinical Pearls and Management Recommendations for Strabismus due to Thyroid Orbitopathy.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Sep;22(3):307-11. [
PMC free article: PMC4502173] [
PubMed: 26180468]
- 133.
Bosnar D, Knežić Zagorec M, Cigić V, Ramić S. Correspondence.
Retina. 2026 Jun 01;46(6):e66-e67. [
PubMed: 41490250]
- 134.
Akhtar A, Macfarlane RJ, Waseem M. Pre-operative assessment and post-operative care in elective shoulder surgery.
Open Orthop J. 2013;7:316-22. [
PMC free article: PMC3788190] [
PubMed: 24093051]
- 135.
Chattannavar G, Haefeli LM, Procopio R, Reis LM, Capasso JE, Thuma TBT, Semina EV, Schneider A, Levin AV. Novel variant in
FGFR2 in a family with anterior segment anomalies.
Ophthalmic Genet. 2026 Jun;47(3):304-308. [
PubMed: 41486651]
- 136.
Agarwal NB, Sheth JN, Nanavati H, Sharma SS, Naik M, Gupta R. A prospective randomized pilot study comparing fibrin glue, buried suture knot and exposed suture knot techniques for conjunctival closure in bilateral symmetrical fornix approach squint surgery.
Strabismus. 2026 Jan 05;:1-8. [
PubMed: 41487057]
- 137.
Gurnani B, Kaur K. Renaissance of an Emerging Pathogen-
Pythium insidiosum Keratitis: An Indian Perspective.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025;19:4811-4830. [
PMC free article: PMC12722410] [
PubMed: 41446894]
- 138.
Gurnani B, Kaur K. Immune Camouflage in
Pythium insidiosum Keratitis: A Hypothesis on Molecular Mimicry and Host Pattern Recognition Receptor Evasion.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025;19:4855-4873. [
PMC free article: PMC12724185] [
PubMed: 41446892]
- 139.
Gurnani B, Kaur K. Corneal cross-linking for keratoconus: a global economic and clinical perspective.
J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):2119-2124. [
PubMed: 41320236]
- 140.
Murugan SB, Sunil Kumar, Gurnani B, Kaur K. Assessment of Subjective Visual Experiences During Intraocular Surgery and Intravitreal Injection Among Uveitis Patients at a Tertiary Eye Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2026 Jan;15(1):173-191. [
PMC free article: PMC12882885] [
PubMed: 41196490]
- 141.
Gurnani B, Kaur K, Chaudhary S, Gandhi AS, Balakrishnan H, Mishra C, Gosalia H, Dhiman S, Joshi S, Nagtode AH, Jain S, Aguiar M, Rustagi IM. Nystagmus in Clinical Practice: From Diagnosis to Treatment-A Comprehensive Review.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025;19:1617-1657. [
PMC free article: PMC12094828] [
PubMed: 40401036]
- 142.
Althiabi S, AlDarrab A, Alenezi SH, Alharbi BA, Aljbreen AJ, Alsalamah GF, Alotaibi RA, Almutairi FA, Albadrani NA. Psychological and Social Challenges Parents of Children With Strabismus Face in Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Cureus. 2023 Mar;15(3):e36920. [
PMC free article: PMC10148722] [
PubMed: 37128539]
- 143.
Karanfilian T, Gupta L, Moon JY, Barmettler A. Demographic disparities in teprotumumab use for thyroid eye disease in the United States.
Orbit. 2026 Apr;45(2):275-283. [
PubMed: 41474061]
- 144.
Lin M, Borchert MS, Chang MY. Vision-Specific Quality of Life in Children With Cortical or Cerebral Visual Impairment.
J Vis Impair Blind. 2025 Jul-Aug;119(4):256-265. [
PMC free article: PMC12746829] [
PubMed: 41473410]
- 145.
PRANGEN AD. The treatment of strabismus in children.
Med World. 1945 Dec;63:551. [
PubMed: 21007425]
- 146.
Fedirko PA, Babenko TF, Pilmane M, Medvedovska NV, Junga A, Yaroshenko ZS, Dorichevska RY, Garkava NA. CURRENT ACHIEVEMENTS AND TOPICAL ISSUES IN RADIATION OPHTHALMOLOGY: POST-CHORNOBYL EXPERIENCE.
Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol. 2025 Dec;(30):126-142. [
PubMed: 41469343]
Disclosure: Kirandeep Kaur declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Venkata Kanukollu declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Bharat Gurnani declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
