U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Occupational Safety and Health Administration Rules That Affect Healthcare

; ; .

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: August 2, 2025.

Definition/Introduction

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is a division of the United States Department of Labor. OSHA was established by the United States Congress under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which was signed into law by President Richard Nixon on December 29, 1970. OSHA's primary mission is to promote safe and healthy working environments for employees across the nation. The agency accomplishes this by developing and enforcing safety standards and offering resources such as training programs, educational initiatives, outreach efforts, and technical assistance to support both employers and workers.[1] 

OSHA plays a vital role in the healthcare sector by establishing and enforcing standards that address the specific risks faced by healthcare professionals.[2][3] Through its various standards, OSHA requires hospitals and healthcare facilities to implement comprehensive exposure control plans and promote strategies to reduce musculoskeletal injuries among nurses and other healthcare providers. OSHA encourages the use of mechanical lifts, transfer aids, and evidence-based movement protocols to minimize physical strain and support safe patient mobility. The agency also establishes requirements to implement programs for workplace violence prevention and emergency preparedness, ensuring a safe and healthy work environment. These safety protocols protect the health and well-being of healthcare professionals, enhance overall operational efficiency, reduce costs associated with worker injuries and illnesses, and improve the quality of care provided to patients.[4]

Despite its critical role, OSHA faces several significant limitations that affect its ability to fully protect healthcare professionals and other employees. Limited funding and staffing restrict the number of workplace inspections and the agency's ability to enforce standards. Many existing standards are outdated and do not address emerging hazards in healthcare settings. Developing and updating standards can be slow and face political and industry opposition, often requiring years to enact change. Minimal civil and criminal penalties are often ineffective deterrents to prevent employers from cutting corners on safety. These factors, along with the evolving demographics of the modern workforce, such as independent contractors and per diem workers who fall outside OSHA protection rules, create significant gaps in employee coverage.[5] These limitations underscore the ongoing need for advocacy, policy reform, and interprofessional collaboration to enhance workplace protections and ensure safer working conditions for all workers, including those in the healthcare sector.[6]

Issues of Concern

According to data from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, the total number of recordable injuries and illnesses documented in the private industry healthcare and social assistance sector declined from 665,300 in 2022 to 562,500 in 2023.[7] This decline translates to an injury and illness rate of 3.6 cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers, which is lower than the rate of 4.5 in 2022. Additionally, the adoption of safety standards has substantially reduced overall workplace fatalities, lowering the daily average from approximately 38 deaths in 1970 to 15 per day by 2023. Despite this progress, workplace incidents still result in more than 5000 deaths annually.[2] Data from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries indicate that, unlike the overall workforce, the rate of job-related fatalities among healthcare professionals has not consistently declined year over year. 

Healthcare professionals face numerous safety concerns in the workplace that fall under OSHA's responsibility to ensure a safe environment. Biological hazards pose a significant risk with exposure to bloodborne pathogens such as HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C.[8][9] OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard requires employers to establish exposure control plans, provide training, implement engineering and work practice controls, and offer hepatitis B vaccinations to employees at risk.[10][11]

A recent study found that exposure most commonly occurs during treatment, waste disposal, and needle recapping. Despite repeated training on safety precautions, the rate of percutaneous needlestick and sharp-object injuries, as well as contact with blood or body fluids, remained 34.1 per 1000 healthcare workers over an 8-year period.[12] Despite intermittent training, the incidence did not decrease, indicating the need for a multipronged approach, including the use of safety needles. Additional exposure to infectious agents in healthcare settings necessitates the implementation of comprehensive infection control measures and exposure control plans.

Physical hazards, including slips, trips, and falls, as well as injuries from lifting and moving patients or equipment, are another common concern. The General Duty Clause requires employers to address these risks to prevent musculoskeletal injuries. Recent data reveal that healthcare professionals are 5 times more likely to sustain a musculoskeletal injury compared to workers in other fields. A meta-analysis reports that the annual prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses is 77.2%.[13]

Workplace violence is a significant threat, with healthcare professionals 5 times more likely to be injured by violence compared to those in other industries. In 2018, healthcare professionals accounted for 73% of all nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses related to violence. The number of such incidents in the healthcare sector has continued to increase steadily since 2011.[14][15] OSHA encourages employers to adopt zero-tolerance policies and prevention programs.[16]

OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard requires employers to educate healthcare staff about the risks and safe handling practices associated with chemical hazards, such as exposure to disinfectants and chemotherapy drugs. Equipment and facility safety also require attention, with OSHA mandating the use of appropriate personal protective equipment, adherence to electrical safety standards, and the development of comprehensive emergency preparedness plans. Additionally, OSHA requires employers to record injuries and illnesses and report them promptly to ensure accountability and ongoing safety improvements in healthcare settings.[17]

With the constantly changing healthcare industry, OSHA continues to face several significant challenges in ensuring the safety of healthcare professionals. The development of new standards is often slow, requires significant resources, and faces political and industrial opposition. These limitations result in few updates to address modern hazards such as biological threats, chemical exposures, or new technologies commonly found in healthcare settings.

Further limiting OSHA is the lack of resources and funding. With an annual budget of less than $600 million, far lower than that of other federal agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, which boasts an annual budget of greater than $8 billion, inspecting all workplaces, enforcing regulations consistently, and responding promptly to safety concerns pose significant challenges.[2] The lack of stringent measures and consequences when employers are penalized does little to deter employers in the long term. Penalties for noncompliance are relatively weak, with modest fines and limited criminal sanctions that may fail to deter some employers from neglecting their safety obligations. As a result, employees can be left vulnerable when workplace protections exist on paper but are not enforced in practice. 

Structural changes in the workforce also pose challenges. Compared to 1970, fewer workers are unionized today, and many are independent contractors or self-employed individuals, which puts them outside OSHA's traditional jurisdiction. In healthcare, the evolving roles and responsibilities of advanced clinicians and other team members can make it more challenging to ensure that existing standards adequately cover all risks.[18]

Healthcare facilities also face specific compliance challenges. Workplace violence and other injuries often remain underreported, with studies indicating incidences ranging between 13% and 85%.[12] Additionally, reviews of common citations show that full compliance with all of OSHA's standards remains challenging. Addressing these limitations through improved funding, updated standards, better enforcement, and focused training can help create safer environments for healthcare professionals.

Clinical Significance

The strengths and limitations of OSHA regulations in healthcare settings have direct clinical implications for patients. When effectively implemented, safety standards help ensure that healthcare professionals remain healthy, reducing absenteeism and turnover. These factors support better continuity of care and stronger patient-provider relationships. Preventing occupational exposures to bloodborne pathogens and infectious agents protects both staff and patients from disease transmission and reduces the risk of health care–associated infections. Ergonomic safety protocols that reduce staff injuries enable caregivers to assist patients with mobility safely and effectively, thereby decreasing the likelihood of patient falls or injuries during transfers. Violence prevention programs create safer and calmer care environments, which is especially important for vulnerable patients in settings such as emergency departments or psychiatric units.

Underfunding, outdated standards, and weak enforcement compromise the safety and well-being of both healthcare professionals and patients. Staff who are injured, fearful, or inadequately trained are less equipped to provide attentive, high-quality care and are more at risk of errors and transmitting infections. Therefore, strengthening occupational safety standards and enforcement protects healthcare professionals and promotes safer, more reliable, patient-centered care.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

Effective implementation of OSHA standards in healthcare relies on the shared skills, strategies, and ethical responsibilities of clinicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals working collaboratively. Each team member must understand and apply safety protocols related to bloodborne pathogen exposure, chemical handling, and ergonomic practices, demonstrating the skills to model safe behaviors and train others. Clinicians must proactively assess workplace risks, integrate safety checklists into their workflows, and ensure that exposure control plans and emergency preparedness protocols are regularly updated and maintained.

Interprofessional communication among team members is crucial for sharing information about potential hazards, ensuring the consistent use of personal protective equipment, and safely handling situations involving workplace violence or exposure. All team members should collaborate to maintain a safe environment, including organizing vaccination programs, implementing infection control measures, and preparing for emergencies. Pharmacists contribute by overseeing the secure storage and handling of hazardous drugs and educating staff on these procedures. Nurses often lead the front lines, identifying risks in everyday care and suggesting ergonomic changes that make the work environment safer for both staff and patients.

Review Questions

References

1.
Silverstein M. Getting home safe and sound: occupational safety and health administration at 38. Am J Public Health. 2008 Mar;98(3):416-23. [PMC free article: PMC2253592] [PubMed: 18235060]
2.
Michaels D, Barab J. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration at 50: Protecting Workers in a Changing Economy. Am J Public Health. 2020 May;110(5):631-635. [PMC free article: PMC7144438] [PubMed: 32191515]
3.
Raltz S, Kozarek RA, Kim-Deobald J, Pethigal P, Moorhouse MA. The impact of OSHA regulations on nursing care cost and compliance. Gastroenterol Nurs. 1994 Nov-Dec;17(3):106-9. [PubMed: 7858002]
4.
Dini G, Rahmani A, Montecucco A, Kusznir Vitturi B, Zacconi S, Manca A, Blasi C, Linares R, Morganti M, Bragazzi NL, Razzino A, Durando P. Occupational Injuries and Their Determinants Among Healthcare Workers in Western Countries: A Scoping Review. Med Lav. 2025 Feb 21;116(1) [PMC free article: PMC11883840] [PubMed: 39992194]
5.
Davis KG, Freeman AM, Ying J, Huth JR. Workers' compensation costs for healthcare caregivers: Home healthcare, long-term care, and hospital nurses and nursing aides. Am J Ind Med. 2021 May;64(5):369-380. [PubMed: 33616226]
6.
Aljabri D, Vaughn A, Austin M, White L, Li Z, Naessens J, Spaulding A. An Investigation of Healthcare Worker Perception of Their Workplace Safety and Incidence of Injury. Workplace Health Saf. 2020 May;68(5):214-225. [PubMed: 31983297]
7.
Medeni İ, Alagüney ME, Medeni V. Occupational injuries among healthcare workers: a nationwide study in Turkey. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1505331. [PMC free article: PMC11655324] [PubMed: 39703481]
8.
Medeni V, Çetintepe SP, Medeni İ, Özdemir Öztel H, Bozdağ F, Uğraş Dikmen A. Occupational Injuries Among Hospital Workers: A Retrospective Study in Turkey. J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 07;14(4) [PMC free article: PMC11856549] [PubMed: 40004581]
9.
Debelu D, Mengistu DA, Tolera ST, Aschalew A, Deriba W. Occupational-Related Injuries and Associated Risk Factors Among Healthcare Workers Working in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2023 Jan-Dec;10:23333928231192834. [PMC free article: PMC10447255] [PubMed: 37636487]
10.
Cuming R, Rocco TS, McEachern AG. Improving compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards. AORN J. 2008 Feb;87(2):347-56; quiz 357-60. [PubMed: 18323024]
11.
OSHA's bloodborne pathogens standard: analysis and recommendations. Health Devices. 1993 Feb;22(2):35-92. [PubMed: 8444629]
12.
Erturk Sengel B, Tukenmez Tigen E, Bilgin H, Dogru A, Korten V. Occupation-Related Injuries Among Healthcare Workers: Incidence, Risk Groups, and the Effect of Training. Cureus. 2021 Apr 06;13(4):e14318. [PMC free article: PMC8101271] [PubMed: 33968528]
13.
Sun W, Yin L, Zhang T, Zhang H, Zhang R, Cai W. Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Nurses: A Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2023 Mar;52(3):463-475. [PMC free article: PMC10135498] [PubMed: 37124897]
14.
Hawkins D, Chavarria AL. Fatal Injuries in the Health Care and Social Assistance Industry, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, 2011 to 2019. J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Feb 01;65(2):167-171. [PubMed: 36190911]
15.
Carey I, Hendricks K. Workplace violence against healthcare workers using nationally representative estimates of emergency department data, 2015-2017. Am J Ind Med. 2023 Apr;66(4):333-338. [PMC free article: PMC11284571] [PubMed: 36726213]
16.
OSHA issues guidelines to protect healthcare workers from violence. Patient Acc. 1996 Jun;19(6):1, 3. [PubMed: 10158365]
17.
Khairallah GM, Al-Hajj S, Mowafi H, Rahme DV, Sakr CJ. Occupational injury severity among healthcare workers: a retrospective study. BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):1447. [PMC free article: PMC12004751] [PubMed: 40247310]
18.
Lavoue J, Friesen MC, Burstyn I. Workplace measurements by the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration since 1979: descriptive analysis and potential uses for exposure assessment. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Jan;57(1):77-97. [PMC free article: PMC3589950] [PubMed: 22952385]

Disclosure: Jennifer Goldin declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Raj Patel declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Donald Davis declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK559327PMID: 32644753

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...