U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026.

Cover of GeneReviews®

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Show details

Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type

Synonym: Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia Sutcliffe

, MD, MSc and , MD.

Author Information and Affiliations

Initial Posting: ; Last Update: May 22, 2025.

Estimated reading time: 26 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type (SMDCF) is a skeletal dysplasia characterized by short stature and a waddling gait in early childhood. Short stature may be present at birth or develop in early infancy. Individuals may present with short limbs and/or short trunk. Radiographic features include enlargement and corner fracture-like lesions of the metaphyses, developmental coxa vara, shortened long bones, scoliosis, and vertebral anomalies. Limited joint mobility and chronic pain are common. Vision impairment and glaucoma have been reported.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of SMDCF is established in a proband with characteristic clinical and radiographic features including short stature, corner fracture-like lesions, developmental coxa vara, and vertebral anomalies. Identification of a heterozygous pathogenic variant in COL2A1 or FN1 by molecular genetic testing can confirm the diagnosis if radiographic features are inconclusive.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Standard treatment for scoliosis per orthopedist; surgical treatment for coxa vara, genu valgum or varum, bowing of the tibia, leg length discrepancy, atlantoaxial instability per orthopedist; management of mobility issues and chronic joint pain by orthopedist and/or physiatrist and physical therapist; management of vision impairment and glaucoma per ophthalmologist; management of hypertension per internist and/or cardiologist; management of psychosocial issues by a psychotherapist and/or referral to support groups.

Surveillance: Annual evaluation by an orthopedist and/or physiatrist for scoliosis, other orthopedic complications, mobility issues, and chronic pain. Annual evaluation of intraocular pressure and blood pressure in individuals with FN1-related SMDCF. Annual screening for psychosocial issues.

Agents/circumstances to avoid: Contact sports if atlantoaxial instability is present; activities that cause joint strain in those with joint pain.

Evaluation of relatives at risk: It is appropriate to clarify the genetic status of apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk relatives of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from prompt treatment for orthopedic and ophthalmologic complications.

Genetic counseling.

SMDCF is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. An individual with SMDCF may have an affected parent or, somewhat more frequently, may have the disorder as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant. Each child of an individual with SMDCF has a 50% risk of having SMDCF. If the SMDCF-causing pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Diagnosis

Formal diagnostic criteria for spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type (SMDCF) have not been established.

Suggestive Findings

SMDCF should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical and radiographic features and family history.

Clinical features

  • Mild-to-moderate short stature noted at birth in some individuals with short lower extremities and/or short trunk
  • Mild-to-severe scoliosis
  • Genu varum or valgum
  • Pectus carinatum
  • Limited mobility and/or musculoskeletal pain
  • Vision impairment (e.g., myopia, borderline increased intraocular pressure, Brown syndrome [strabismus caused by dysfunction of the superior oblique muscle])
  • Normal hearing
  • Normal intelligence

Radiographic features

  • Irregular metaphyses
    • Corner fracture-like lesions. The lesions can be asymmetric and are most often seen at the proximal and distal tibiae, distal radii, proximal humeri, and distal femora. These are thought to be irregular ossification centers and/or secondary ossification centers. They tend to enlarge in infancy and then disappear once the growth plates fuse at the time of skeletal maturation. Fusion of the growth plates occurs between age 12 and 16 years in females and age 14 and 19 years in males [Crowder & Austin 2005].
    • Enlargement of the metaphyses of the long bones
  • Developmental coxa vara (i.e., varus deformity of the proximal femora that develops during early childhood) is typically identified by age six years and was described in one individual at birth [Costantini et al 2019].
  • Scoliosis
  • Vertebral anomalies (platyspondyly, hypoplasia, ovoid vertebral bodies, biconcave vertebral bodies, anterior wedging, biconvex vertebral bodies, irregular vertebral bodies, hypoplasia, narrow intervertebral spaces, vertebral fusion)
  • Shortening of the long bones. This finding can be detected on prenatal ultrasound in some individuals.
  • Leg length discrepancy
  • Bowing of the tibia
  • Epiphyses are usually normal.

Family history is consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance (e.g., affected males and females in multiple generations). Absence of a known family history does not preclude the diagnosis.

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of SMDCF is established in a proband with characteristic clinical and radiographic features including short stature, corner fracture-like lesions, developmental coxa vara, and vertebral anomalies. Identification of a heterozygous pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in COL2A1 or FN1 by molecular genetic testing can confirm the diagnosis if radiographic features are inconclusive (see Table 1).

Note: (1) Per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics / Association for Molecular Pathology variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of a heterozygous variant of uncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (concurrent gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, genome sequencing). Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved (see Option 1), whereas comprehensive genomic testing does not (see Option 2).

Option 1

When the clinical and radiographic findings suggest the diagnosis of SMDCF, molecular genetic testing approaches can include concurrent gene testing or use of a multigene panel.

  • Concurrent gene testing. Sequence analysis of COL2A1 and FN1 detects missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. Perform sequence analysis first. If no pathogenic variant is found, perform gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis to detect intragenic deletions or duplications. Note: Although large deletions and duplications have not been reported, deletion/duplication testing may be considered because of the possibility of single or multiexon in-frame deletion or duplication.
  • A multigene panel that includes COL2A1, FN1, and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests. For this disorder a multigene panel that also includes deletion/duplication analysis is recommended (see Table 1).
    For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene is likely involved. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type

Gene 1, 2Proportion of SMDCF Attributed to Pathogenic Variants in GeneProportion of Pathogenic Variants 3 Identified by Method
Sequence analysis 4Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5
COL2A1 12% 6100% 6None reported 7
FN1 60% 8100% 8None reported 7
Unknown28% 9NA

NA = not applicable; SMDCF = spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type

1.

Genes are listed in alphabetic order.

2.
3.

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in these genes.

4.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.

6.
7.

No data on detection rate of gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis are available.

8.
9.

There is evidence of locus heterogeneity (i.e., this disorder can be caused by pathogenic variant[s] in other as-yet-unidentified genes) [Lee et al 2017].

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type (SMDCF) is characterized by short stature and a waddling gait in early childhood. Short stature may be present at birth or develop in early infancy. Individuals may present with short limbs and/or short trunk. Complications include coxa vara, scoliosis, and chronic pain. Some individuals have ocular manifestations. To date, approximately 50 individuals with spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type (SMDCF) have been reported. A heterozygous COL2A1 or FN1 pathogenic variant has been identified in 23 individuals with SMDCF [Walter et al 2007, Lee et al 2017, Machol et al 2017, Cadoff et al 2018, Costantini et al 2019, Sabir et al 2021, Ramos-Mejía et al 2024]. The following description of the phenotypic features associated with this condition is based on these reports. Two affected individuals had no detailed clinical description [Lee et al 2017, Costantini et al 2019].

Table 2.

Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type: Frequency of Select Features

FeatureProportion of Persons w/FeatureComment
Abnormal metaphyses20/20
Short stature19/21
Short upper extremities3/3
Short lower extremities6/7
Short trunk4/6
Vertebral anomalies17/20
Scoliosis16/20Mild to severe
Pectus carinatum7/15
Coxa vara10/19Typically identified by age 6 yrs
Abnormal gait9/9
Musculoskeletal pain7/7Only reported in persons w/FN1-related SMDCF
Limited mobility4/5Secondary to pain &/or limb deformity
Genu varum10/20
Genu valgum5/20
Leg length discrepancy4/4
Accentuated lumbar lordosis3/4
Premature birth9/15
Vision impairment3/6Myopia, borderline ↑ intraocular pressure, Brown syndrome
Dysmorphic features5/6Only reported in persons w/FN1-related SMDCF

SMDCF = spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type

Presentation. Individuals with SMDCF present at birth or in early childhood with short stature [Lee et al 2017], scoliosis, variable genu varum or valgum, developmental coxa vara, and pectus carinatum. Shortening of the long bones can be detected on prenatal ultrasound in some individuals [Machol et al 2017, Costantini et al 2019] and intrauterine growth restriction was reported in three individuals [Walter et al 2007, Cadoff et al 2018, Sabir et al 2021].

Almost half of the individuals were born premature.

Growth. SMDCF is typically associated with short stature that persists throughout life. Some individuals present with short trunk and others with short limbs. The expected adult height is more than two standard deviations (SD) below the mean, with half of individuals three SD below the mean. In two individuals with COL2A1-related SMDCF, head circumference was above the 90th centile. For most of the other individuals reported, head circumference falls within the normal range for their age.

Scoliosis and other spine manifestations. Scoliosis is common and can be mild to severe. Individuals with FN1-related SMDCF often require scoliosis surgery. In two individuals with COL2A1-related SMDCF, accentuated lumbar lordosis was reported.

Because of the association of SMDCF with scoliosis and short stature, there is a risk for chest deformity; pectus carinatum is reported. One individual with COL2A1-related SMDCF had odontoid hypoplasia [Machol et al 2017]. One individual with FN1-related SMDCF had os odontoideum and C1-C2 instability requiring surgery [Ramos-Mejía et al 2024], and another individual also had C1-C2 instability requiring surgery [Costantini et al 2019].

Hip / lower extremity manifestations. Developmental coxa vara (i.e., varus deformity of the proximal femora that develops during early childhood) is typically identified by age six years and was described in one individual at birth [Costantini et al 2019]. Coxa vara in individuals with SMDCF can cause significant morbidity that can require surgery.

Genu valgum and genu varum are both described and may require surgical treatment [Lee et al 2017, Machol et al 2017]. Leg length discrepancy has been reported [Lee et al 2017, Machol et al 2017, Costantini et al 2019, Sabir et al 2021]. Bowing of the tibia was reported in three individuals [Cadoff et al 2018, Costantini et al 2019, Ramos-Mejía et al 2024].

There have been reports of chronic pain, especially in the legs, in individuals with SMDCF. All individuals described were ambulatory except for one individual who became wheelchair bound in adulthood because of painful joint limitations [Lee et al 2017, Machol et al 2017, Cadoff et al 2018, Costantini et al 2019, Sabir et al 2021, Ramos-Mejía et al 2024]. In one affected individual, pain restricted activity and necessitated physical therapy [Costantini et al 2019]. One individual had acute quadriparesis secondary to spinal cord compression due to odontoid anomalies. This individual required surgical decompression and instrumented occipitocervical stabilization [Ramos-Mejía et al 2024].

Ocular manifestations. Most individuals have normal vision, with the exception of two individuals with myopia [Walter et al 2007, Costantini et al 2019] and one with Brown syndrome (strabismus caused by dysfunction of the superior oblique muscle) [Machol et al 2017]. One child with myopia also had borderline elevated intraocular pressure [Costantini et al 2019].

Hearing impairment has not been reported to date.

Intelligence is normal.

Nonspecific dysmorphic features. The following nonspecific dysmorphic features have been reported in one or more individuals with FN1-related SMDCF: flat facial profile, triangular face, broad and prominent forehead, high anterior hairline, facial asymmetry, prominent eyes, bilateral upslanted palpebral fissures, large almond-shaped eyes, ear anomalies (posteriorly rotated ears, underfolded helix with prominent ears, hypoplastic lobe and antitragus, preauricular tag), high palate, small and/or pointed chin, and micrognathia [Lee et al 2017, Costantini et al 2019, Sabir et al 2021].

Other

  • COL2A1-related SMDCF. To date, the following manifestations have been reported in only one affected individual each: short neck, small and round iliac wings, pubic bone hypoplasia, and epiphyses reduced in size [Walter et al 2007, Machol et al 2017].
  • FN1-related SMDCF. To date, the following manifestations have been reported in only one affected individual each: hypertension, osteoarthrosis, joint hypermobility, intradural lipoma, megacisterna magna, dental anomalies (missing teeth), bicuspid aortic valve, avascular necrosis of capitulum, short distal phalanges, asymmetry of the feet, low bone mineral density with fractures, elevation of osteocalcin and N-terminal telopeptide, and iron deficiency [Lee et al 2017, Cadoff et al 2018, Costantini et al 2019, Sabir et al 2021].

Phenotype Correlations by Gene

COL2A1. Some distinguishing features reported in individuals with COL2A1-related SMDCF include biconcave vertebral bodies and milder scoliosis [Walter et al 2007, Machol et al 2017].

FN1. Some distinguishing features reported in individuals with FN1-related SMDCF include nonspecific dysmorphic facial features, low bone mineral density with fractures, and chronic musculoskeletal pain. Scoliosis in individuals with FN1-related SMDCF tends to be more severe, and abnormalities of the vertebrae are frequent (e.g., ovoid-shaped vertebral bodies, anterior wedging, narrow intervertebral spaces, vertebral fusion, vertebral hypoplasia) [Lee et al 2017, Cadoff et al 2018, Costantini et al 2019, Sabir et al 2021, Ramos-Mejía et al 2024]. Developmental coxa vara is less frequent in individuals with FN1-related SMDCF.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

No clinically relevant genotype-phenotype correlations for FN1 and COL2A1 have been identified given the relatively small number of individuals reported to date.

Penetrance

Penetrance is 100%.

Nomenclature

In the 2023 revision of the Nosology of Genetic Skeletal Disorders [Unger et al 2023], COL2A1-related SMDCF is included under COL2A1-related spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia and is part of the type 2 collagen disorders group. FN1-related SMDCF is referred to as FN1-related spondylometaphyseal dysplasia Sutcliffe and is included in the spondylometaphyseal dysplasias group.

Differential Diagnosis

Genetic disorders with overlapping clinical and radiographic features of spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type (SMDCF) include those listed in Table 4.

Table 4.

Genes of Interest in the Differential Diagnosis of Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type

GeneDisorderMOIFeatures of Disorder
Like SMDCFUnlike SMDCF
ATP7A Menkes disease (See ATP7A-Related Copper Transport Disorders.)XL
  • Short stature
  • Corner fractures, osteoporosis
  • Microcephaly, kinky & sparse hair, skin hypopigmentation, skin/joint laxity, neurologic degeneration, low serum copper & ceruloplasmin concentration
  • Wormian bones
  • Note: Subcutaneous injections of copper histidinate beginning by age 28 days 1 enhances survival & improves neurodevelopmental outcomes.
CFAP410 CFAP410-related axial spondylometaphyseal dysplasia (OMIM 602271)AR
  • Short stature, short limbs
  • Platyspondyly, coxa vara, metaphyseal dysplasia, short metacarpals
  • Retinal abnormalities, progressive retinal degeneration, optic atrophy, cone-rod dystrophy, nystagmus, splenomegaly
  • Small thorax & thoracic deformation, lacy iliac wings, narrow sacrosciatic notch, short femoral neck
COL10A1 Schmid metaphyseal chondrodysplasia AD
  • Short stature
  • Platyspondyly, corner fracture-like lesions, metaphyseal abnormalities, coxa vara, genu varum
End plate irregularities, metaphyseal abnormalities of phalanges & metacarpals
GALNS Mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA AR
  • Short stature, scoliosis, short trunk, pectus carinatum, joint pain, normal intelligence
  • Odontoid hypoplasia, platyspondyly, widened metaphyses, genu valgum
  • Coarse facial features, corneal opacities, hearing loss, hepatomegaly, hypermobile joints, abnormal glycosaminoglycan excretion in urine
  • Cervical subluxation, rib abnormalities, compression of spinal cord, epiphyseal involvement, coxa valga, hip dislocation, ulnar deviation of wrists
PCYT1A PCYT1A-related spondylometaphyseal dysplasia w/cone-rod dystrophy (OMIM 608940)AR
  • Short stature, scoliosis, short limbs
  • Ovoid vertebral bodies, platyspondyly, coxa vara, metaphyseal involvement, tibial & femoral bowing
  • Cone-rod dystrophy, macular involvement, nystagmus
  • Rib cupping, flat acetabuli, hypoplastic inferior ilia, narrow sacrosciatic notch, brachydactyly, short metacarpals
PTH1R PTH1R-related metaphyseal chondrodysplasia, Jansen type AD
  • Short stature, facial dysmorphism
  • Corner fracture-like lesions, osteopenia
Choanal stenosis, deafness, nephrocalcinosis, hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia
SBDS
(EFL1
DNAJC21
SRP542
Shwachman-Diamond syndrome AR 3
  • 50% of affected children are below 3rd centile for height.
  • Ovoid vertebral bodies, coxa vara, metaphyseal dysplasia of long bones, osteoporosis
  • Small head circumference, poor weight gain, exocrine pancreatic deficiency, bone marrow failure, cognitive &/or behavioral impairment
  • Narrow thorax & costal abnormalities, narrow sacroiliac notch, delayed skeletal maturation
TRPV4 TRPV4-related spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Kozlowski type (See Autosomal Dominant TRPV4 Disorders.)AD
  • Short trunk, pectus carinatum, scoliosis
  • Odontoid hypoplasia, irregular metaphyses, coxa vara
  • Marked platyspondyly & kyphoscoliosis, severe involvement of short tubular bones, hand/carpal/foot abnormalities
  • Not assoc w/corner fractures
TRPV4-related spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia, Maroteaux type (See Autosomal Dominant TRPV4 Disorders.)AD
  • Short trunk, scoliosis
  • Platyspondyly, proximal femoral metaphyseal dysplasia
Kyphosis, rectangular vertebral bodies, shortened iliac w/greater sciatic notches, small square iliac wings, micromelia, epiphyseal dysplasia, degenerative joint disease, severe brachydactyly, delayed carpal & phalangeal ossification, dysplastic carpal bones, short metacarpal & phalangeal bones

AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; DD = developmental delay; ID = intellectual disability; MOI = mode of inheritance; SMDCF = spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type; XL = X-linked

1.

Corrected for prematurity/gestational age

2.

Pathogenic variants in EFL1, DNAJC21, or SRP54 are associated with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) in <1% of affected individuals.

3.

SDS caused by pathogenic variants in SRP54 is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

Disorders of unknown genetic cause

  • Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia, Duetting type (SMD type A4) (OMIM 609052), an autosomal recessive disorder, shares the following features with SMDCF: corner fractures, irregular metaphyses, ovoid vertebral bodies, pectus carinatum, platyspondyly, short limbs, short stature, and small iliac wings.
    Unlike SMDCF, SMD, Duetting type is also characterized by bipartite trochlea, brachydactyly, coxa valga, dolichocephaly, irregular patellar margins, osteoporotic tarsals and metatarsals, sclerotic costochondral joints, severe metaphyseal changes of the femoral neck, and tongue-like deformity of the vertebral bodies.
  • Blount disease (OMIM 188700, 259200). Like SMDCF, Blount disease is characterized by corner fracture-like lesions. Unlike SMDCF, Blount disease is also characterized by osteochondritis dissecans (knee), sloping proximal tibial epiphysis, genu varum, and tibia vara.

Other. Corner fractures can also be caused by nonaccidental injuries [Leaman et al 2016], congenital contractures, rickets, and scurvy [Lee et al 2017].

Management

No clinical practice guidelines for spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type (SMDCF) have been published. In the absence of published guidelines, the following recommendations are based on the authors' personal experience managing individuals with this disorder.

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with SMDCF, the evaluations summarized in Table 5 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 5.

Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type: Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

SystemEvaluationComment
Musculoskeletal Referral to orthopedic surgeon, physiatrist, & PT depending on local practicesTo evaluate for scoliosis, mobility issues, & other skeletal manifestations
Flexion-extension radiographs of cervical spine
  • To evaluate for cervical instability 1
  • If atlantoaxial instability is present, eval by anesthesiologist & pulmonary assessment (when indicated) prior to any surgery 2
Ophthalmology Referral to ophthalmologist for vision assessmentIncl eval of intraocular pressure in persons w/FN1-related SMDCF 3
Cardiovascular Eval of blood pressureIn persons w/FN1-related SMDCF 3
Respiratory Eval by pulmonologistRecommended for those w/COL2A1-related SMDCF 4
Genetic counseling By genetics professionals 5To obtain a pedigree & inform affected persons & their families re nature, MOI, & implications of SMDCF to facilitate medical & personal decision making
Psychosocial support & resources Referral to psychology &/or other resources for supportFor issues related to short stature, joint pain, limited mobility

MOI = mode of inheritance; PT = physical therapist; SMDCF = spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type

1.

Recommendations are based on two individuals reported with this feature.

2.
3.

Recommendations are based on one individual reported with this feature.

4.

Recommendations are based on the best practice guidelines regarding diagnosis and management of individuals with type II collagen disorders [Savarirayan et al 2019].

5.

Clinical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, certified genetic nurse, genetics advanced practice provider (nurse practitioner or physician assistant)

Treatment of Manifestations

Supportive care to improve quality of life, maximize function, and reduce complications is recommended. This ideally involves multidisciplinary care by specialists in relevant fields (see Table 6).

Table 6.

Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type: Treatment of Manifestations

Manifestation/ConcernTreatmentReferences
Scoliosis Treatment per orthopedist
Coxa vara Surgical treatment per orthopedist Currarino et al [2000]
Joint pain / Limited mobility Mgmt per physiatrist & PT; surgical treatment by orthopedist
Genu valgum/varum Surgical treatment per orthopedistLee et al [2017], Machol et al [2017]
Bowing of tibia Machol et al [2017], Cadoff et al [2018], Costantini et al [2019], Ramos-Mejía et al [2024]
Leg length discrepancy Lee et al [2017], Machol et al [2017], Costantini et al [2019]
Atlantoaxial instability Costantini et al [2019], Ramos-Mejía et al [2024]
Vision impairment &/or glaucoma Mgmt per ophthalmologist
Hypertension Mgmt per internist &/or cardiologistIn persons w/FN1-related SMDCF 1
Psychosocial issues Mgmt by psychotherapist &/or referral to support groups

PT = physical therapist

1.

Recommendations are based on a single individual reported with this feature.

Note: For individuals with COL2A1-related SMDCF, there is no evidence that treatment with human growth hormone supplementation increases final height [Savarirayan et al 2019]; therefore, it is not recommended.

Surveillance

To monitor existing manifestations, the individual's response to supportive care, and the emergence of new manifestations, the evaluations summarized in Table 7 are recommended.

Table 7.

Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type: Recommended Surveillance

System/ConcernEvaluationFrequency
Musculoskeletal Eval by orthopedic surgeon & physiatrist depending on local practices for scoliosis, other skeletal manifestations, mobility issues, & chronic joint painAnnually
Glaucoma Eval of intraocular pressure 1Annually in those w/FN1-related SMDCF
Hypertension Eval of blood pressure 1
Psychosocial Assessment for psychosocial issuesAnnually
1.

Recommendations are based on a single individual reported with this feature.

Agents/Circumstances to Avoid

Avoid contact sports if atlantoaxial instability is present.

For individuals with joint pain, avoid activities that strain joints; instead, favor joint-friendly activities (e.g., swimming, cycling).

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

It is appropriate to clarify the genetic status of apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk relatives of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from prompt treatment for orthopedic and ophthalmologic complications. Evaluations can include:

  • Molecular genetic testing if the pathogenic variant in the family is known;
  • Measurement of height, physical examination, and radiographs of the spine and limbs if the pathogenic variant in the family is not known.

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type (SMDCF) is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • An individual with a clinical and/or molecular diagnosis of SMDCF may have an affected parent.
  • Somewhat more frequently, an individual diagnosed with SMDCF represents a simplex case (i.e., the only family member known to be affected). In 15 families in which the parents of a proband with COL2A1- or FN1-related SMDCF underwent molecular genetic testing, the causative pathogenic variant occurred de novo in 11 probands:
  • If a molecular diagnosis has been established in the proband and the proband appears to be the only affected family member, molecular genetic testing is recommended for the parents of the proband to evaluate their genetic status and inform recurrence risk assessment. Note: A proband may appear to be the only affected family member because of failure to recognize the disorder in family members due to a milder phenotypic presentation [Machol et al 2017]. Therefore, de novo occurrence of a COL2A1 or FN1 pathogenic variant in the proband cannot be confirmed unless molecular genetic testing has demonstrated that neither parent has the pathogenic variant.
  • If the pathogenic variant identified in the proband is not identified in either parent and parental identity testing has confirmed biological maternity and paternity, the following possibilities should be considered:

Sibs of a proband. The risk to the sibs of the proband depends on the clinical/genetic status of the proband's parents:

Offspring of a proband

  • Each child of an individual with SMDCF has a 50% risk of having SMDCF.
  • Because many individuals with short stature have reproductive partners with short stature, offspring of individuals with SMDCF may be at risk of having double heterozygosity for two dominantly inherited bone growth disorders. The phenotypes of these individuals are distinct from those of the parents, and the affected individuals may suffer from serious sequelae and poor outcomes [Krakow 2015].

Other family members. The risk to other family members depends on the status of the proband's parents: if a parent has an SMDCF-causing pathogenic variant, members of the parent's family may be at risk.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

See Management, Evaluation of Relatives at Risk for information on evaluating at-risk relatives for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment.

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected.

DNA banking. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, pathogenic mechanisms, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA from probands in whom a molecular diagnosis has not been confirmed (i.e., the causative pathogenic mechanism is unknown). For more information, see Huang et al [2022].

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the SMDCF-causing pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing. While most health care professionals would consider use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A.

Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type: Genes and Databases

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from HGNC; chromosome locus from OMIM; protein from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click here.

Table B.

OMIM Entries for Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type (View All in OMIM)

120140COLLAGEN, TYPE II, ALPHA-1; COL2A1
135600FIBRONECTIN 1; FN1
184255SPONDYLOMETAPHYSEAL DYSPLASIA, CORNER FRACTURE TYPE; SMDCF

Molecular Pathogenesis

The formation of fibronectin depends on FN1. Fibronectin is a major component of the extracellular matrix and is the foundation of collagen, glycosaminoglycans, and other constituents [Cadoff et al 2018]. By its role in the extracellular matrix, fibronectin is essential for the formation of cartilaginous tissues and bones [Cadoff et al 2018, Costantini et al 2019].

COL2A1 is important for the production of type II collagen. This collagen is synthetized by chondrocytes and is an important component of the extracellular matrix (OMIM 120140). Alterations in this gene can lead to multiple skeletal dysplasias and ocular abnormalities since it is the main constituent of cartilage and vitreous humor [Walter et al 2007].

Mechanism of disease causation. Pathogenic variants in FN1, which occur throughout different domains, often affect cysteine residues that form disulfide bonds in the fibronectin type I domain. Those bonds create the three-dimensional structure of fibronectin, and their perturbation leads to instability and possible risk of degradation by metalloproteinases (MMP9 and MMP13) [Costantini et al 2019, Dinesh et al 2022].

  • Pathogenic variants in the N-terminal assembly domain, necessary for fibronectin interaction to form fibrils, affect the assembly of the cell and lower the number of fibrils in the cell matrix [Lee et al 2017, Cadoff et al 2018].
  • Pathogenic variants in the III-2 domain, necessary for the assembly of fibronectin, result in similar levels of mutated mRNA and wild type mRNA but greatly reduced secretion of the abnormal protein [Cadoff et al 2018] and accumulation of abnormal fibronectin within the cells [Lee et al 2017].
  • Fibronectin is secreted by the liver; levels in the plasma of affected individuals is reduced [Cadoff et al 2018]. Circulating fibronectin in the plasma deposits in the bones. This plays a role in the mineralization, density, and assembly of the collagen fibers [Bentmann et al 2010, Costantini et al 2019].

Mutated fibronectin is exported from rough endoplasmic reticulum into vesicles and accumulates in mutated cells. There is an increase in intracellular fibronectin and a decrease in extracellular fibronectin levels. This impairs stem cell proliferation, mesenchymal condensation, and the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocytes [Dinesh et al 2024].

COL2A1-related diseases generally occur through dominant-negative mechanisms. COL2A1 encodes the alpha-1 chain of type II procollagen. This procollagen contains a triple-helical domain [Zhang et al 2020]. Pathogenic variants in COL2A1, typically resulting in a substitution of a glycine residue [Machol et al 2017], alter the homotrimer assembly and stability of type II collagen. Those residues play an essential role in the collagen helix and assembly into fibrils, and their disruption can lead to manifestation of the disease [Walter et al 2007, Machol et al 2017]. Misfolding can also affect secretion, and the accumulation in chondrocytes could be deleterious to their function.

Table 8.

Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Corner Fracture Type: Notable Pathogenic Variants by Gene

Gene 1Reference SequencesDNA Nucleotide ChangePredicted Protein ChangeComment [Reference]
COL2A1 NM_001844​.5
NP_001835​.3
c.541G>Cp.Gly181ArgGlycine substitutions are implicated in 1/3 of persons w/type II collagenopathies & are more frequent w/more severe phenotypes [Walter et al 2007, Barat-Houari et al 2016, Machol et al 2017].
c.1034G>Ap.Gly345Asp
c.2833G>Ap.Gly945Ser
FN1 NM_212482​.3
NP_997647​.1
c.260G>Tp.Cys87PheImpairs fibronectin secretion [Lee et al 2017]
c.718T>Gp.Tyr240AspImpairs fibronectin secretion [Lee et al 2017]. This tyrosine residue was shown to be important for fibronectin binding to fibroblasts [Sottile et al 1991].
c.2425_2427delp.Thr809delOnly amino acid deletion reported to date [Lee et al 2017]

Variants listed in the table have been provided by the authors. GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.

GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen​.hgvs.org). See Quick Reference for an explanation of nomenclature.

1.

Genes from Table 1 in alphabetic order.

Chapter Notes

Author Notes

Philippe Campeau laboratory: pcampeaulab.org

Dr Campeau focuses on studying new skeletal dysplasias, new forms of epilepsy, and chromatin-remodeling disorders. His lab identifies disease-causing genes, studies the pathologic basis of disease in cells and mice, and strives to improve the management of children affected by these conditions, notably through clinical trials.

Author History

Philippe M Campeau, MD (2020-present)
Jade England, MD, MSc (2020-present)
Ashley McFarquhar, BSc; McGill University (2020-2025)

Revision History

  • 22 May 2025 (sw) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 19 March 2020 (sw) Review posted live
  • 3 July 2019 (pmc) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • Barat-Houari M, Sarrabay G, Gatinois V, Fabre A, Dumont B, Genevieve D, Touitou I. Mutation update for COL2A1 gene variants associated with type II collagenopathies. Hum Mutat. 2016;37:7-15. [PubMed: 26443184]
  • Bentmann A, Kawelke N, Moss D, Zentgraf H, Bala Y, Berger I, Gasser JA, Nakchbandi IA. Circulating fibronectin affects bone matrix, whereas osteoblast fibronectin modulates osteoblast function. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:706-15. [PubMed: 19821765]
  • Cadoff EB, Sheffer R, Wientroub S, Ovadia D, Meiner V, Schwarzbauer JE. Mechanistic insights into the cellular effects of a novel FN1 variant associated with a spondylometaphyseal dysplasia. Clin Genet. 2018;94:429-37. [PMC free article: PMC6175647] [PubMed: 30051459]
  • Costantini A, Valta H, Baratang NV, Yap P, Bertola DR, Yamamoto GL, Kim CA, Chen J, Wierenga KJ, Fanning EA, Escobar L, McWalter K, McLaughlin H, Willaert R, Begtrup A, Alm JJ, Reinhardt DP, Mäkitie O, Campeau PM. Novel fibronectin mutations and expansion of the phenotype in spondylometaphyseal dysplasia with "corner fractures". Bone. 2019;121:163-71. [PubMed: 30599297]
  • Crowder C, Austin D. Age ranges of epiphyseal fusion in the distal tibia and fibula of contemporary males and females. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:1001-7. [PubMed: 16225203]
  • Currarino G, Birch JG, Herring JA. Developmental coxa vara associated with spondylometaphyseal dysplasia (DCV/SMD): "SMD-corner fracture type" (DCV/SMD-CF) demonstrated in most reported cases. Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30:14-24. [PubMed: 10663502]
  • Dinesh NEH, Campeau PM, Reinhardt DP. Fibronectin isoforms in skeletal development and associated disorders. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2022;323:C536-C549. [PubMed: 35759430]
  • Dinesh NEH, Rousseau J, Mosher DF, Strauss M, Mui J, Campeau PM, Reinhardt DP. Mutations in fibronectin dysregulate chondrogenesis in skeletal dysplasia. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024;81:419. [PMC free article: PMC11456097] [PubMed: 39367925]
  • Franceschini P, Licata D, Signorile F, Guala A, Ingrosso G, Franceschini D. Tetralogy of Fallot in a patient with developmental coxa vara/spondylometaphyseal dysplasia-corner fracture type (DCV/SMD-CF) expanding the variability. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;136A:395-7. [PubMed: 16001436]
  • Huang SJ, Amendola LM, Sternen DL. Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on. J Community Genet. 2022;13:389-97. [PMC free article: PMC9314484] [PubMed: 35834113]
  • Kozlowski K, Napiontek M, Beim ER. Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Sutcliffe type: a rediscovered entity. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1992;43:364-8. [PubMed: 1393702]
  • Kozlowski K, Robben S, Bellemore M, Sillence D, Zonderland H. Spondylo-metaphyseal dysplasia corner fracture type (a cautionary tale). Radiol Med. 1993;85:7-11. [PubMed: 8480052]
  • Krakow D. Skeletal dysplasias. Clin Perinatol. 2015;42:301-19, viii. [PMC free article: PMC4456691] [PubMed: 26042906]
  • Langer LO Jr, Brill PW, Ozonoff MB, Pauli RM, Wilson WG, Alford BA, Pavlov H, Drake DG. Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, corner fracture type: a heritable condition associated with coxa vara. Radiology. 1990;175:761-6. [PubMed: 2343127]
  • Leaman LA, Hennrikus WL, Bresnahan JJ. Identifying non-accidental fractures in children aged <2 years. J Child Orthop. 2016;10:335-41. [PMC free article: PMC4940250] [PubMed: 27339476]
  • Lee CS, Fu H, Baratang N, Rousseau J, Kumra H, Sutton VR, Niceta M, Ciolfi A, Yamamoto G, Bertola D, Marcelis CL, Lugtenberg D, Bartuli A, Kim C, Hoover-Fong J, Sobreira N, Pauli R, Bacino C, Krakow D, Parboosingh J, Yap P, Kariminejad A, McDonald MT, Aracena MI, Lausch E, Unger S, Superti-Furga A, Lu JT, Cohn DH, Tartaglia M, Lee BH, Reinhardt DP, Campeau PM, et al. Mutations in fibronectin cause a subtype of spondylometaphyseal dysplasia with "corner fractures". Am J Hum Genet. 2017;101:815-23. [PMC free article: PMC5673654] [PubMed: 29100092]
  • Machol K, Jain M, Almannai M, Orand T, Lu JT, Tran A, Chen Y, Schlesinger A, Gibbs R, Bonafe L, Campos-Xavier AB, Unger S, Superti-Furga A, Lee BH, Campeau PM, Burrage LC. Corner fracture type spondylometaphyseal dysplasia: overlap with type II collagenopathies. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173:733-9. [PMC free article: PMC5315610] [PubMed: 27888646]
  • Nair N, Satapathy AK, Gupta N, Kabra M, Gupta AK, Jana M. Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia corner fracture (Sutcliffe) type. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83:1191-4. [PubMed: 27130511]
  • Rahbari R, Wuster A, Lindsay SJ, Hardwick RJ, Alexandrov LB, Turki SA, Dominiczak A, Morris A, Porteous D, Smith B, Stratton MR, Hurles ME, et al. Timing, rates and spectra of human germline mutation. Nat Genet. 2016;48:126-33. [PMC free article: PMC4731925] [PubMed: 26656846]
  • Ramos-Mejía R, Heath KE, Modamio-Hoybjor S, Huckstadt V, Calcagni J, Remondino R, Fano V. Unexpected findings in cervical spine in spondylometaphyseal dysplasia Sutcliff type FN1-related. Am J Med Genet A. 2024;194:e63469. [PubMed: 37940834]
  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405-24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]
  • Sabir AH, Singhal J, Man J, Mensah NE, Ahn JW, Cheung MS, Irving M. Automated reanalysis, a novel way to diagnose an ultra-rare condition: fibronectin-1-related spondylometaphyseal dysplasia (SMD-FN1). Clin Dysmorphol. 2021;30:154-8. [PubMed: 33605604]
  • Savarirayan R, Bompadre V, Bober MB, Cho TJ, Goldberg MJ, Hoover-Fong J, Irving M, Kamps SE, Mackenzie WG, Raggio C, Spencer SS, White KK, et al. Best practice guidelines regarding diagnosis and management of patients with type II collagen disorders. Genet Med. 2019;21:2070-80. [PubMed: 30696995]
  • Sottile J, Schwarzbauer J, Selegue J, Mosher DF. Five type I modules of fibronectin form a functional unit that binds to fibroblasts and Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:12840-3. [PubMed: 1677003]
  • Sutton VR, Hyland JC, Phillips WA, Schlesinger AE, Brill PW. A dominantly inherited spondylometaphyseal dysplasia with "corner fractures" and congenital scoliosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;133A:209-12. [PubMed: 15666313]
  • Unger S, Ferreira CR, Mortier GR, Ali H, Bertola DR, Calder A, Cohn DH, Cormier-Daire V, Girisha KM, Hall C, Krakow D, Makitie O, Mundlos S, Nishimura G, Robertson SP, Savarirayan R, Sillence D, Simon M, Sutton VR, Warman ML, Superti-Furga A. Nosology of genetic skeletal disorders: 2023 revision. Am J Med Genet A. 2023;191:1164-209. [PMC free article: PMC10081954] [PubMed: 36779427]
  • Walter K, Tansek M, Tobias ES, Ikegawa S, Coucke P, Hyland J, Mortier G, Iwaya T, Nishimura G, Superti-Furga A, Unger S. COL2A1-related skeletal dysplasias with predominant metaphyseal involvement. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A:161-7. [PubMed: 17163530]
  • White KK, Bompadre V, Goldberg MJ, Bober MB, Cho TJ, Hoover-Fong JE, Irving M, Mackenzie WG, Kamps SE, Raggio C, Redding GJ, Spencer SS, Savarirayan R, Theroux MC, et al. Best practices in peri-operative management of patients with skeletal dysplasias. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173:2584-95. [PubMed: 28763154]
  • Zhang B, Zhang Y, Wu N, Li J, Liu H, Wang J. Integrated analysis of COL2A1 variant data and classification of type II collagenopathies. Clin Genet. 2020;97:383-95. [PubMed: 31758797]
Copyright © 1993-2026, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (http://www.genereviews.org/) and copyright (© 1993-2026 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: ude.wu@tssamda.

Bookshelf ID: NBK555103PMID: 32200603

Views

Tests in GTR by Gene

Related information

  • OMIM
    Related OMIM records
  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed
  • Gene
    Locus Links

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...