U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Penile Fracture

; ; .

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: March 1, 2024.

Continuing Education Activity

Penile fractures, though infrequent, present a significant challenge in urological emergencies. Primarily caused by direct, blunt trauma during sexual activity, these fractures lead to tunica albuginea rupture due to escalated cavernosal pressure, categorizing them as true urological surgical emergencies. This activity focuses on the comprehensive evaluation and treatment of penile fractures, shedding light on their etiology and potential impact on a patient's sexual health when left unaddressed.

The course discussion emphasizes the paramount importance of early identification and prompt intervention in managing penile fractures to prevent long-term sexual dysfunction. Through an exploration of diagnostic approaches, treatment modalities, and the indispensable role of an interprofessional team, this session aims to equip healthcare professionals with the requisite knowledge and strategies to effectively manage and mitigate the adverse effects of this severe urogenital injury. Learners will gain insights into the nuanced evaluation techniques and surgical interventions critical in preserving sexual function and ensuring optimal outcomes for patients suffering from penile fractures.

Objectives:

  • Identify the etiology of penis fracture.
  • Assess the typical presentation and physical exam findings in a patient with a penile fracture.
  • Compare management considerations for patients with a penile fracture.
  • Determine some interprofessional team strategies for improving care coordination and communication to improve outcomes for patients affected by penile fractures.
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction

Penile fracture is uncommon, but it is essential to promptly identify this specific urogenital injury. The majority of such injuries occur from direct blunt penile trauma during sexual intercourse. Severe blunt trauma to an erect penis results in markedly increased cavernosal pressure that, if severe enough, results in the rupture of the tunica albuginea, which is termed a penile fracture.

Delays in the treatment of penile fractures can lead to long-lasting sexual dysfunction. Given the serious potential sequelae of this injury, if not treated promptly, penile fractures are considered true urological surgical emergencies. This article will review the identification, evaluation, treatment, and proper management of penile fractures.

Etiology

A penile fracture is typically the result of direct trauma to the penis during sexual intercourse. In one study, 57.2% of patients with confirmed penile fractures reported such direct blunt trauma to the erect penis during intercourse.[1] The erect penis may slip from the vagina and be thrust directly into the perineum or pelvic bone. This active thrusting results in markedly increased pressure inside the blood-filled corpus cavernosa, where the tension causes a rupture of the tunica albuginea. The tearing causes an acute loss of the erection together with immediate swelling, bruising, angulation, hematoma formation, and pain.

Additionally, there may be an associated tear of the penile urethra and urinary retention. The urethra is involved in about 20% of cases, and the corpora spongiosum in up to 30%.[2] The most commonly associated sexual positions are "female superior" or "rear entry," however, one study noted that meta-analyses showed no particular sexual position had an increased risk.[3][4] 

Masturbation injuries and falls landing on an erect penis are other notable causes of penile fractures.[5] Bending or angulation of the penis while attempting vigorous vaginal penetration, rolling over during sleep, and anal intercourse, are other reported causes.[6] Forcefully bending the erect penis downwards to cause rapid detumescence (called taqaandan) is a common practice in many Middle Eastern, North African, and Central Asian cultures, which can also lead to penile fractures.[7][8][9]

Epidemiology

This injury is isolated to persons with phenotypically male genitalia for obvious reasons. Penile fractures most commonly occur in middle-aged men; multiple studies note that the average age of patients is between 30 and 50 years of age.[1][10][11] 

Patients are typically heterosexual males. However, this injury can also occur in men who have sex with men. In one study, 1.8% of penile fractures occurred in homosexual men.[12] As such, for all men who report urogenital trauma, a penile fracture should remain in the differential diagnosis regardless of sexual orientation.[1] 

One study has noted a disproportionately higher number of penile fractures occurring during the summer months and on weekends.[2] The reported yearly overall incidence in the United States is 1 case per 175,000 men.[4][13] In parts of the world where taqaandan is practiced, this is often the most frequent cause of penile fractures.[7][8][9][14]

Pathophysiology

During an erection, the corpora become pressurized and filled with blood, which causes them to become rigid, firm, and erect. The strength, stiffness, and expansion of the tunica albuginea, which covers the corpora, block the venous return and is therefore responsible for maintaining rigidity during an erection. The tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa is extremely strong and inflexible. The typical intracavernosal pressure during a normal, full, rigid erection is only about 100 mmHg, whereas the tunica has such tensile strength that it can withstand a bursting pressure of 1,500 mmHg.[13][15]

The circular fibers of the tunica albuginea that form the corpora cavernosa become stretched and thin during an erection. Their normal thickness is 2 mm, but this decreases to just 0.25 mm when the corpora are fully engorged, and the penis is erect.[13] Their weakest point is generally on the ventral side of the penile shaft immediately adjacent to the urethra, where most ruptures occur. It explains the mechanism of any associated urethral injuries. Urethral injury is more likely when both corpora are ruptured.[16]

Immediately after the penile fracture, there is pain, bruising, immediate significant swelling, angulation, and rapid detumescence. Frequently, patients will remember a sudden, audible snapping or cracking sound at the exact time of the injury. As the corpora are engorged with blood and pressurized, then subjected to a sudden, sharp increase in pressure, it is easy to understand how the acute extravasation, pain, swelling, and the other symptoms associated with the injury can develop so quickly. The mechanism is similar to overfilling a balloon to bursting or a sudden blowout on a car tire, where there is immediate explosive decompression from a pressurized enclosure. 

If the urethra is damaged, urination will be affected, and hematuria or urethral blood may be seen. Buck's fascia will confine the hematoma, bruising, and swelling to the penile shaft. If the fascia is damaged, blood and possibly urine can spread into the retroperitoneum, perineum, scrotum, or suprapubic spaces, often leaving a "butterfly" pattern.[17]

Injuries to the penile dorsal vein associated with penile fractures are rare but have been reported.[18][19] Isolated penile dorsal vein ruptures clinically appear similarly to penile fractures but without any audible snapping.[18][19] Treatment is similar.

The use of penile injections of clostridium histolyticum collagenase for Peyronie's disease has created a new etiology for penile fractures.[20] The mechanism is a reduction in the strength of the tunica by the collagenase activity. The incidence of penile fractures associated with this treatment is reported as 0.5% to 4.9%.[21][22]

History and Physical

Penile fractures often occur during intercourse. Typical historical findings associated with penile fracture include:[6]

  • Angulation of the penis, typically away from the side of the injury
  • An erect penis at the time of the trauma
  • Bruising and significant swelling of the penis and surrounding area
  • Immediate detumescence
  • Pain in the genitals
  • A "pop" or "shaping" sound (patient-reported)
  • Trauma to the genitals

A physical exam should be comprehensive and may include the following findings: [6]

  • Angulated penis
  • Ecchymotic shaft (an "eggplant" deformity)
  • Flaccid penis or asymmetric erection
  • Significant penile shaft swelling
  • Tenderness of the penis

Evaluation

The diagnosis of penile fractures is typically made clinically by direct examination.[6] The penis will often demonstrate a classic "eggplant deformity" and will tend to deviate away from the side of the rupture.[6][23] The presence of a possible urethral injury may not be readily apparent.[24] 

Blood at the urethral meatus, hematuria, and difficulty voiding should prompt an assessment for a urethral injury.[2] The American Urological Association guidelines recommend provocative testing with the intent to rule out a urethral injury if there is a suspicion that this may be the case.[25] This testing could either be an intraoperative cystoscopy or a retrograde urethrogram.[25] The European Association of Urology guidelines are aligned with these recommendations but suggest intraoperative cystoscopy over preoperative retrograde urethrography since retrograde urethrograms have a higher false positive rate and may delay access to the operating room.[9][26]

The workup surrounding penile fractures should include preoperative laboratory evaluation, and other studies to rule out concomitant urethral injury may be warranted. Suspicion of a penile fracture, based on history alone, should warrant a thorough evaluation to rule out related injuries, including dorsal penile vein and nerve damage, while simultaneously diagnosing the penile fracture. In addition to clinical suspicion for a tunica rupture, multiple imaging modalities are available which can be useful to identify penile fractures and diagnose urethral injuries.

Ultrasound is readily available in most emergency centers, can be performed quickly, and is generally recommended; however, there is some controversy over its true clinical utility as the actual test is very operator-dependent, and successful identification of a penile corporal injury requires specific expertise.[27][28] The ultrasound may show irregular defects at the site of a cavernosal rupture.[29][30] However, if there is a significant hematoma (which is common in these cases), it may increase the difficulty of diagnosing a tunica rupture exclusively by ultrasound.

Although CT is widely available and has been demonstrated to be helpful in the identification of the exact location and size of injury to aid in surgical repair, it exposes the patient to radiation (particularly to the genitals) and incurs extra cost. Additionally, the test rarely affects the surgery and delays the patient's arrival at the operating room.[31] 

MRI, although not the quickest, cheapest, or most readily available test, has been shown to assist in the diagnosis and perioperative management of penile fractures.[32][33] One study demonstrated 100% sensitivity along with 77.8% specificity for the identification of tunica ruptures in the penis by MRI.[32]

Cavernosography can be useful and definitive; however, like MRI and CT imaging, it is generally reserved for those unusual cases where the clinical presentation and physical examination are not adequate for a diagnosis, and a more detailed examination is required.[34]

Treatment / Management

Treatment of penile fractures should be a prompt operative repair of the defect. Preoperative antibiotics should be given.

An initial linear incision is acceptable for the opening of the skin, but many urologists prefer a circumcising subcoronal incision that allows degloving of the penile shaft skin. This provides optimal surgical exposure and avoids leaving a longitudinal suture line along the ventral penile shaft.[35] Access to injuries at the base of the penis may also be accomplished by a midline penoscrotal incision which avoids a full degloving of the shaft.

After opening the skin, the hematoma should be evacuated as completely as possible. The hematoma should be removed, allowing direct and complete visualization of the tunica for any tears or defects. These are typically seen on the ventral surface of the tunica, starting at its juncture with the urethra and extending axially.

The urethra should also be carefully examined even if the preoperative evaluation did not suggest a urethral injury. If there is any doubt, an intraoperative flexible cystoscopy should be performed.

The placement of a Foley catheter at the time of surgery is recommended even in cases where no urethral injury is found or suspected.[36] This stabilizes the corpora and serves as a useful surgical landmark. The catheter is usually removed the day after surgery in patients without urethral damage.[36]

An absorbable suture (polyglactin or polydioxanone, size 00 is the most frequently selected) is used to repair the tunica defect.[9][28][34][37] Interrupted sutures are typically used for strength.[9] Lateral sutures at the edges of the defect are optional. Some surgeons will bury the knots from the tunica repair to further minimize postoperative scarring.[38]

A solution of indigo carmine and normal saline can be injected directly into the corpora cavernosa or through the glans into the corpora spongiosum to evaluate the integrity of the repair and to inspect the area for any unrecognized injuries or leaks.[35] A tourniquet should be placed around the base of the penis immediately before such intraoperative test injections.[35]

Buck's fascia should also undergo repair if it appears damaged. A torn Buck's fascia can result in a scrotal hematoma. Such a hematoma should be surgically evacuated and drained.[39]

This surgical repair should be performed promptly, as delays cause increased extravasation, poorer healing, increased fibrosis, and more complications. Multiple studies have proven a significant change in functional outcomes with delayed repairs of penile fractures.[28][34][37] One study showed that a delay of approximately 8 hours resulted in substantial increases in erectile dysfunction postoperatively.[40]

The one exception to the standard recommendation to perform urgent surgical repair of a penile fracture may be those cases of corporal tearing that follow the administration of clostridium histolyticum collagenase plaque injections for treating Peyronie disease.[41][20][41] In such cases, the recommendation is to treat the injury conservatively if the urethra has not been injured, as the integrity of the tunica has been compromised by the collagenase.[20][41] 

Urethral tears should generally be repaired primarily with smaller, absorbable sutures in a tension-free manner over a Foley catheter.[28][34][37] The catheter should remain in place for at least two weeks, and a periurethral urethrogram should be performed before Foley removal.

Postoperatively, patients should receive routine postsurgical care instructions, including incisional care and information regarding indications to return to the emergency department. Patients should be instructed to refrain from intercourse during the postoperative period as well.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnoses for penile fracture include:

  • Anasarca
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Dorsal vein rupture
  • Dependent penile edema
  • Paraphimosis
  • Pelvic trauma
  • Penile cellulitis
  • Penile contusion
  • Priapism
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Urethral tear

Prognosis

The prognosis for a promptly identified and repaired penile fracture is excellent, although there is a risk for long-lasting sexual effects due to the injury.[4] Immediate surgical repair of a penile fracture and any associated urethral injuries serves to minimize complications.[8][28][34][37] High-volume centers that see this injury frequently tend to have better outcomes.[8]

Complications

The most obvious and concerning complication of penile fracture is sexual dysfunction. All patients who are subject to penile fracture will experience some degree of sexual dysfunction, at least temporarily. Most are limited to the immediate postoperative period; however, some patients will experience long-lasting dysfunction.

Many patients will have anxiety over sexual performance after a penile fracture. Patients may also exhibit changes in sexual practices due to fears of a recurrent injury. Counseling may be needed to help guide a patient through the postoperative period to minimize psychological effects or sexual dysfunction following a penile fracture.[11]

Surgical complications may also include plaques and nodules, scarring, penile curvature or angulation, erectile dysfunction, painful erections, infection, reoperation, urethral stricture, penile induration, corporal aneurysm, wound edema, and urinary disorders.[4] Noticeable or bothersome scarring has been closely associated with the failure to use absorbable sutures.[33][42]

There is a significant risk of a concomitant urethral injury. Special attention is necessary to ensure correct Foley placement intraoperatively if such an injury is present. A missed urethral rupture could lead to a number of additional complications, including:

  • Abscess formation
  • Curvature of the penis
  • Erectile dysfunction
  • Extravasation
  • Fibrosis and plaque formation
  • Fistula formation (arteriovenous, corporourethral, urethrocutaneous, etc)
  • Hematuria
  • Nodule formation at the injury site
  • Painful erections
  • Painful intercourse
  • Urethral stricture
  • Urinary retention
  • Urinoma formation
  • Weak urinary stream

Conservative management of penile fractures has significantly more complications than immediate surgical intervention, mainly concerning erectile dysfunction.[4] Additionally, the patient may have excessive scar tissue development resulting in curvature of the penis, painful erections, penile angulation, and a consequent loss of penile length during erections. These factors all support early operative repair of penile fractures and should be discussed thoroughly with patients when explaining the risks and benefits of immediate surgical intervention.

Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care

Patients should receive clear and concise postoperative care instructions, as understanding the condition is imperative for a smooth recovery. The patient should know that the Foley catheter's maintenance and care are paramount. The clinical team should advise the patient that the Foley will likely be in place for at least 2 weeks to protect any urethral repair that might have been performed.

Additionally, the patient will need instructions for wound care regarding the penile incision and when he might safely resume elective sexual activity. Wounds should be kept clean and free of contaminants. The patient should not attempt shaving around the wound and should keep it dry unless otherwise instructed.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patient education should include a discussion regarding the common causes of penile trauma. Healthy sexual practices should be a topic covered with the patient, including avoidance of vigorous or unusual sexual positions, which can be associated with penile trauma. The practice of forceful bending of the erect penis, called taqaandan, as practiced in some Middle Eastern, African, and Central Asian cultures, should be discouraged. Postoperative patients should be educated on incisional care and provided with clear instructions regarding follow-up.

Pearls and Other Issues

  • The diagnosis of a fractured penis is primarily based on clinical history and physical examination findings, including the "classic eggplant" appearance.
  • Using penile ultrasound or other imaging is optional but not generally required.
  • Further imaging that unduly delays surgical exploration may not be warranted.
  • Imaging rarely affects the surgery.
  • Urgent surgical intervention is recommended.
  • The standard approach is a circumscribing, subcoronal incision followed by degloving of the penile shaft skin.
  • Tunica defects are typically axial in orientation, starting from the urethra-tunica junction.
  • Bilateral corporal defects are less common but more likely to be associated with a urethral injury than unilateral ones.
  • Intraoperative flexible cystoscopy is recommended for the identification of all urethral injuries; it may be preferred over retrograde urethrography as it is more reliable in finding urethral injuries and causes fewer delays.
  • After hematoma evacuation and inspection, repairs are most often done with interrupted 00 polyglactin or polydioxanone using buried knots.
  • Urethral injuries are repaired with smaller, absorbable sutures over a Foley catheter.
  • Patients receiving collagenase for Peyronie disease may do better with conservative measures than immediate surgery as long as there are no urethral injuries or leaks.
  • All cases should have the urethra around the corporal rupture carefully explored for a possible injury.
  • Consider using an indigo carmine/saline solution injected into the corpora or glans to test for leaks and hidden injuries.
  • Use absorbable suture material to avoid scarring. 2-0 is usually recommended.
  • Consider burying the knots when closing the tunica, as there will only be the relatively thin penile shaft skin covering the repair.
  • Interrupted sutures for the tunica are usually recommended for strength, but a continuous suture with interrupted reinforcements has also been used.
  • An isolated dorsal superficial vein in the penis can appear clinically identical to a penile fracture.[18][19] Treatment is the same as with a penile fracture, as both require surgical exploration, hematoma evacuation, and repair.[18][19]
  • If a urethral injury is found and repaired, leave a Foley catheter for at least 2 weeks and consider performing a periurethral urethrogram before removal.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The emergency department, with its team of physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and ancillary staff, is essential for the early identification and diagnosis of penile fractures. Although high-volume centers may have somewhat improved outcomes, it may not always be possible or advisable for a patient with penile fracture to visit one.

Regarding repairing the injury, the entire operating room staff has a part to play in a patient's outcome. Postoperatively, the patient will require surgical wound care instructions by nurses, close follow-up by the surgeon, mindful care by office staff, and possible mental health services for underlying or newly developing emotional issues related to the injury. All healthcare team members dealing with these patients should be aware of these issues and help identify them.

The successful management of any complications may include counseling by licensed therapists or psychologists for the facilitation of a return to baseline sexual function. The successful management of a penile fracture is impossible without a cohesive and comprehensive interprofessional healthcare team that is all coordinated and collectively invested in the patient and his outcome. 

Review Questions

References

1.
Kati B, Akin Y, Demir M, Boran OF, Gumus K, Ciftci H. Penile fracture and investigation of early surgical repair effects on erectile dysfunction. Urologia. 2019 Nov;86(4):207-210. [PubMed: 31010389]
2.
Pariser JJ, Pearce SM, Patel SG, Bales GT. National Patterns of Urethral Evaluation and Risk Factors for Urethral Injury in Patients With Penile Fracture. Urology. 2015 Jul;86(1):181-5. [PubMed: 26142603]
3.
Barros R, Schulze L, Ornellas AA, Koifman L, Favorito LA. Relationship between sexual position and severity of penile fracture. Int J Impot Res. 2017 Sep;29(5):207-209. [PubMed: 28659630]
4.
Amer T, Wilson R, Chlosta P, AlBuheissi S, Qazi H, Fraser M, Aboumarzouk OM. Penile Fracture: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2016;96(3):315-29. [PubMed: 26953932]
5.
Ory J, Bailly G. Management of penile fracture. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Jun;13(6 Suppl4):S72-S74. [PMC free article: PMC6565403] [PubMed: 31194931]
6.
Agarwal MM, Singh SK, Sharma DK, Ranjan P, Kumar S, Chandramohan V, Gupta N, Acharya NC, Bhalla V, Mavuduru R, Mandal AK. Fracture of the penis: a radiological or clinical diagnosis? A case series and literature review. Can J Urol. 2009 Apr;16(2):4568-75. [PubMed: 19364429]
7.
Majzoub AA, Canguven O, Raidh TA. Alteration in the etiology of penile fracture in the Middle East and Central Asia regions in the last decade; a literature review. Urol Ann. 2015 Jul-Sep;7(3):284-8. [PMC free article: PMC4518360] [PubMed: 26229311]
8.
Falcone M, Garaffa G, Castiglione F, Ralph DJ. Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev. 2018 Apr;6(2):253-260. [PubMed: 28874325]
9.
Kominsky H, Beebe S, Shah N, Jenkins LC. Surgical reconstruction for penile fracture: a systematic review. Int J Impot Res. 2020 Jan;32(1):75-80. [PubMed: 31685943]
10.
Ortac M, Özgor F, Caglar U, Esmeray A, Savun M, Sarılar Ö. Older age and a large tunical tear may be predictors of increased erectile dysfunction rates following penile fracture surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2020 Mar;32(2):226-231. [PubMed: 31165779]
11.
Barros R, Schul A, Ornellas P, Koifman L, Favorito LA. Impact of Surgical Treatment of Penile Fracture on Sexual Function. Urology. 2019 Apr;126:128-133. [PubMed: 30605691]
12.
Barros R, Lacerda G, Schul A, Ornellas P, Koifman L, Favorito LA. Sexual complications of penile frature in men who have sex with men. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 May-Jun;44(3):550-554. [PMC free article: PMC5996807] [PubMed: 29493183]
13.
Yogi P, Sapkota S, Shiwakoti S, Dongol UMS, Paudyal P, Karki A. Penile Fracture: A Case Report. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Oct 01;60(254):895-897. [PMC free article: PMC9924918] [PubMed: 36705147]
14.
Zargooshi J. Sexual function and tunica albuginea wound healing following penile fracture: An 18-year follow-up study of 352 patients from Kermanshah, Iran. J Sex Med. 2009 Apr;6(4):1141-1150. [PubMed: 19138357]
15.
Al-Hajjaj M, Alali Aljool A, Al Husein H. Penile fracture: An analysis of 9 cases in a tertiary hospital. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul;79:104028. [PMC free article: PMC9289411] [PubMed: 35860156]
16.
Bhoil R, Sood D. Signs, symptoms and treatment of penile fracture. Emerg Nurse. 2015 Oct;23(6):16-7. [PubMed: 26451939]
17.
Gottenger EE, Wagner JR. Penile fracture with complete urethral disruption. J Trauma. 2000 Aug;49(2):339-41. [PubMed: 10963550]
18.
Kurkar A, Elderwy AA, Orabi H. False fracture of the penis: Different pathology but similar clinical presentation and management. Urol Ann. 2014 Jan;6(1):23-6. [PMC free article: PMC3963338] [PubMed: 24669117]
19.
Bar-Yosef Y, Greenstein A, Beri A, Lidawi G, Matzkin H, Chen J. Dorsal vein injuries observed during penile exploration for suspected penile fracture. J Sex Med. 2007 Jul;4(4 Pt 2):1142-6. [PubMed: 17081217]
20.
Sharma KL, Bole R, Yang D, Alom M, Savage J, Ziegelmann M, Trost L. Conservative management of suspected fractures in men undergoing collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Peyronie's Disease is not associated with worsening of erectile function. Int J Impot Res. 2022 Jan;34(1):100-107. [PubMed: 33318638]
21.
Carson CC, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Tursi JP, Smith TM, Kaufman GJ, Gilbert K, Honig SC. Analysis of the clinical safety of intralesional injection of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) for adults with Peyronie's disease (PD). BJU Int. 2015 Nov;116(5):815-22. [PubMed: 25818264]
22.
Beilan JA, Wallen JJ, Baumgarten AS, Morgan KN, Parker JL, Carrion RE. Intralesional Injection of Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum May Increase the Risk of Late-Onset Penile Fracture. Sex Med Rev. 2018 Apr;6(2):272-278. [PubMed: 28923562]
23.
Bachoo S, Batura D. Fractures of the penis. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2021 Oct 02;82(10):1-9. [PubMed: 34726937]
24.
Kasaraneni P, Mylarappa P, Gowda RD, Puvvada S, Kasaraneni D. Penile fracture with urethral injury: Our experience in a tertiary care hospital. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019 Jan 17;90(4):283-287. [PubMed: 30655641]
25.
Morey AF, Brandes S, Dugi DD, Armstrong JH, Breyer BN, Broghammer JA, Erickson BA, Holzbeierlein J, Hudak SJ, Pruitt JH, Reston JT, Santucci RA, Smith TG, Wessells H., American Urological Assocation. Urotrauma: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):327-35. [PMC free article: PMC4104146] [PubMed: 24857651]
26.
Lumen N, Kuehhas FE, Djakovic N, Kitrey ND, Serafetinidis E, Sharma DM, Summerton DJ. Review of the current management of lower urinary tract injuries by the EAU Trauma Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):925-9. [PubMed: 25576009]
27.
Nasser TA, Mostafa T. Delayed surgical repair of penile fracture under local anesthesia. J Sex Med. 2008 Oct;5(10):2464-9. [PubMed: 18507715]
28.
Hinev A. Fracture of the penis: treatment and complications. Acta Med Okayama. 2000 Oct;54(5):211-6. [PubMed: 11061570]
29.
Dell'Atti L. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of penile trauma. J Ultrasound. 2016 Sep;19(3):161-6. [PMC free article: PMC5005206] [PubMed: 27635160]
30.
Nizamani WM, Ali SI, Vaswani AK, Shahani BK. Ultrasound Diagnosis of Penile Fracture. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Oct;25 Suppl 2:S12-3. [PubMed: 26522196]
31.
Yan C, Liang BX, Huang HB, Liang BR, Zhou Z, Wang LJ, Yang ZQ, Xian SX. CT-guided minimally-invasive penile fracture repair. Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jan-Feb;45(1):183-186. [PMC free article: PMC6442154] [PubMed: 30556992]
32.
Sokolakis I, Schubert T, Oelschlaeger M, Krebs M, Gschwend JE, Holzapfel K, Kübler H, Gakis G, Hatzichristodoulou G. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Penile Fracture in Real-Life Emergency Settings: Comparative Analysis with Intraoperative Findings. J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):552-557. [PubMed: 30840543]
33.
Pretorius ES, Siegelman ES, Ramchandani P, Banner MP. MR imaging of the penis. Radiographics. 2001 Oct;21 Spec No:S283-98; discussion S298-9. [PubMed: 11598264]
34.
Gedik A, Kayan D, Yamiş S, Yılmaz Y, Bircan K. The diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture: our 19-year experience. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011 Jan;17(1):57-60. [PubMed: 21341136]
35.
Kamdar C, Mooppan UM, Kim H, Gulmi FA. Penile fracture: preoperative evaluation and surgical technique for optimal patient outcome. BJU Int. 2008 Dec;102(11):1640-4; discussion 1644. [PubMed: 18710448]
36.
Bulbul E, Gultekin MH, Citgez S, Derekoylu E, Demirbilek M, Akkus E, Ozkara H. Penile fracture: Tertiary care center experience and long-term complications after immediate repair. Andrology. 2022 Mar;10(3):560-566. [PubMed: 34939748]
37.
El Atat R, Sfaxi M, Benslama MR, Amine D, Ayed M, Mouelli SB, Chebil M, Zmerli S. Fracture of the penis: management and long-term results of surgical treatment. Experience in 300 cases. J Trauma. 2008 Jan;64(1):121-5. [PubMed: 18188109]
38.
Hatzichristodoulou G, Dorstewitz A, Gschwend JE, Herkommer K, Zantl N. Surgical management of penile fracture and long-term outcome on erectile function and voiding. J Sex Med. 2013 May;10(5):1424-30. [PubMed: 23445526]
39.
Wiratama MA, Djatisoesanto W, Hakim L. Severe penile fracture with bilateral corpus cavernosum rupture, complete urethral rupture and scrotal haematoma associated with sexual intercourse: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jul;96:107377. [PMC free article: PMC9284044] [PubMed: 35780647]
40.
Bozzini G, Albersen M, Otero JR, Margreiter M, Cruz EG, Mueller A, Gratzke C, Serefoglu EC, Salamanca JIM, Verze P., European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Men's Health working party. Delaying Surgical Treatment of Penile Fracture Results in Poor Functional Outcomes: Results from a Large Retrospective Multicenter European Study. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jan;4(1):106-110. [PubMed: 28753754]
41.
Hughes WM, Natale C, Hellstrom WJG. The Management of Penile Fracture: a Review of the Literature with Special Consideration for Patients Undergoing Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Injection Therapy. Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Jan 20;22(2):13. [PubMed: 33471204]
42.
Ibrahiem el-HI, el-Tholoth HS, Mohsen T, Hekal IA, el-Assmy A. Penile fracture: long-term outcome of immediate surgical intervention. Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):108-11. [PubMed: 19896174]

Disclosure: Kyle Diaz declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Stephen Leslie declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Heather Cronovich declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK551618PMID: 31869082

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...