U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026.

Cover of GeneReviews®

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Show details

Autosomal Recessive RPE65-Related Retinal Degeneration

Synonyms: Autosomal Recessive RPE65-RD, RPE65 Mutation-Associated Retinal Degeneration (RPE65-IRD)

, BS, BA and , MD, PhD.

Author Information and Affiliations

Initial Posting: ; Last Update: January 8, 2026.

Estimated reading time: 27 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

The three phenotypes of autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration, from most severe to mildest, are Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD), and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa (RP).

In RPE65-related LCA, onset of visual manifestations frequently occurs in infancy during the first year of life. Central vision can be variable, but children ages four to ten years in the largest case series had severe visual impairment (mean visual acuity: 20/126). While vision is relatively stable in the first decade of life, it begins to decline again starting in the teens, with 50% of individuals being legally blind (visual acuity of 20/200 and/or visual fields extending <20 degrees from fixation) by age 20 years. After age 20 years, vision loss is more rapidly progressive: all affected individuals are legally blind by the fourth decade and many have complete loss of vision (i.e., no light perception).

In RPE65-related EOSRD, onset of visual manifestations typically occurs in early childhood often presenting with nyctalopia (i.e., inability or reduced ability to see in dim light or at night) and reduced visual acuity. Individuals typically experience progressive decline in central vision, and many meet the criteria for legal blindness by the fourth decade; some progress to profound visual loss (including no light perception) by mid-adulthood.

In RPE65-related juvenile RP, onset of visual manifestations typically occurs in late childhood or adolescence. Individuals often present with nyctalopia, progressive peripheral visual field loss, and relatively preserved central visual acuity in earlier stages. Affected individuals often maintain central vision into early adulthood; however, many meet the criteria for legal blindness by age 40 to 50 years, and some experience further decline in later decades, occasionally progressing to very poor vision, including no light perception.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration is established in a proband with suggestive findings and biallelic pathogenic variants in RPE65 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Targeted therapy: Subretinal gene supplementation therapy for individuals between ages 12 months and 65 years with retinal degeneration known to be associated with biallelic RPE65 pathogenic variants.

Supportive treatment: Healthy balanced diet to reach the minimum reference daily intake (RDI) for nutrients. Docosahexaenoic acid / eicosapentaenoic acid supplements up to 500 mg/day as well as lutein supplements up to 10 mg/day can be considered if dietary intake is not sufficient.

Children with autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration are usually of normal intellect but may experience learning delays due to visual impairment. Overarching principles should include involving child development and educational specialists at the earliest available opportunity, often with specialist teachers/schools for the visually impaired and early referral to low vision services to access low vision aids, especially with improving technologies, such as the refreshable Braille display. Advice on learning / intellectual disability / educational issues will vary from country to country, or even region to region within a country, depending on support services available.

Surveillance: Routinely scheduled follow up with the treating ophthalmologist.

Agents/circumstances to avoid: Children should be discouraged whenever possible from repeatedly poking and pressing on their eyes, as it may cause damage to the cornea and/or retina.

Evaluation of relatives at risk: It is appropriate to clarify the genetic status of apparently unaffected older and younger at-risk sibs in order to identify those who have biallelic RPE65 pathogenic variants and may benefit from early evaluation, counseling, and timely consideration of subretinal gene supplementation therapy.

Genetic counseling.

RPE65-related retinal degeneration is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. If both parents of a child diagnosed with autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration are known to be heterozygous for an RPE65 pathogenic variant, each sib of an affected individual has at conception a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of being unaffected and not a carrier. Once the RPE65 pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member, carrier testing for at-risk relatives and prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Scope

Autosomal Recessive RPE65-Related Retinal Degeneration: Included Phenotypes 1, 2, 3
  • Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA)
  • Early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD)
  • Juvenile retinitis pigmentosa (RP)

For synonyms, see Nomenclature.

1.
2.

For other genetic causes of these phenotypes, see Differential Diagnosis.

3.

For autosomal dominant phenotypes associated with heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in RPE65, see Genetically Related Disorders.

Diagnosis

No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration have been published.

Suggestive Findings

Autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical, electroretinographic, and imaging findings and family history.

Clinical findings

  • Symptomatic onset between birth and age five years
  • Roving eye movements or nystagmus
  • Poor pupillary light responses (in some)
  • Profound nyctalopia
  • Central visual acuity decreased to the 20/100 range (which can be variably preserved if initial manifestations are between ages one and five years). Generally, central visual acuity is worse when onset is before age one year compared to onset between ages one and five years.
  • Fundus examination can be quite variable and can appear normal at presentation. Associated findings include retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) mottling, pigmentary retinopathy with attenuated vessels, optic nerve pallor, white spots at the level of the RPE, parafoveal RPE loss as a bull's-eye maculopathy, and optic disc drusen (see Nonsyndromic Leber Congenital Amaurosis / Early-Onset Severe Retinal Dystrophy Overview).

Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) findings. An ERG is an electrophysiologic test that assesses the functional status of the photoreceptors and proximal neuronal layers of the retina. The ERG represents a composite response of millions of retinal cells. In RPE65-related Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD), the ERG is severely reduced or non-recordable [Lorenz 2025]. When onset of clinical manifestations is later (i.e., between ages one and five years), variable ERG findings can include residual activity on dark-adapted scotopic (rod) ERGs as well as light-adapted photopic (cone) ERGs.

Imaging findings

  • Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) can detect autofluorescent material within the RPE and choroid (e.g., lipofuscin and melanin) that is indicative of retinal health. Severely diminished or absent short-wavelength (SW) fundus autofluorescence (FAF) is observed because of the enzymatic blockade in the visual cycle. A relatively preserved central retinal structure by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and near-infrared FAF in the presence of very abnormal or undetectable SW-FAF signals is nearly pathognomonic of RPE65-related LCA [Lorenz et al 2004]. SW-FAF can be performed on young children often without anesthesia.
  • Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a light-based imaging technology that uses tissue differences in optical interference to create cross-sectional high-resolution (micron-scale) images to measure retinal thickness and to determine which outer layers of the retina are involved in retinal degeneration [Huang et al 1991, Huang et al 1998]. OCT findings in RPE65-related LCA and EOSRD can be variable and can include a preserved central foveal region with thinning of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) that surrounds the fovea [Jacobson et al 2005, Jacobson et al 2007, Maeda et al 2009].
    Note: While two studies suggested that OCT in RPE65-related LCA and EOSRD reveals an age-related decreased thickness in the foveal ONL layer [Jacobson et al 2007, Cideciyan et al 2013], a third study (which measured overall retinal thickness at the fovea) did not find a relationship between foveal ONL layer thickness and age [Chung et al 2019].

Family history is consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance (e.g., affected sibs and/or parental consanguinity). Absence of a known family history does not preclude the diagnosis.

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration is established in a proband with suggestive findings and biallelic pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variants in RPE65 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Note: (1) Per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics / Association for Molecular Pathology variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of biallelic RPE65 variants of uncertain significance (or of one known RPE65 pathogenic variant and one RPE65 variant of uncertain significance) does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.

Molecular genetic testing approaches include a combination of gene-targeted testing (multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome or genome sequencing). Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved (see Option 1), whereas comprehensive genomic testing does not (see Option 2).

Note: Single-gene testing (sequence analysis of RPE65, followed by gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis) is rarely useful and typically NOT recommended.

Option 1

A multigene panel that includes RPE65 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) may be considered to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.

For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

Comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which genes is likely involved. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible. To date, the majority of RPE65 pathogenic variants reported (e.g., missense, nonsense) are within the coding region and are likely to be identified on exome sequencing; however, rare mechanisms such as large deletions and uniparental isodisomy may not be detected by exome sequencing alone and may require complementary methods.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

Autosomal Recessive RPE65-Related Retinal Degeneration: Molecular Genetic Testing

Gene 1MethodProportion of Pathogenic Variants 2 Identified by Method
RPE65 Sequence analysis 3>99% 4
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 51 deletion reported 6
1.
2.

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in this gene.

3.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

4.

Morimura et al [1998], Thompson et al [2000], Chung et al [2019], Lorenz [2025], and data derived from the subscription-based professional view of Human Gene Mutation Database [Stenson et al 2020]

5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Exome and genome sequencing may be able to detect deletions/duplications using breakpoint detection or read depth; however, sensitivity can be lower than gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis.

6.

A deletion of exons 1-7 was reported by Al-Gazali & Ali [2010] in a large family with six affected children.

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

The three phenotypes of autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration, from most severe to mildest, are Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD), and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa (RP).

Systemic manifestations have not been reported in autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration.

RPE65-related LCA is a severe inherited retinal degeneration with onset of visual manifestations frequently within in the first year of life [Cideciyan 2010]. Visual function is generally poor (but in some instances central vision is variably preserved) and is often accompanied by nystagmus and sluggish or near-absent pupillary responses.

  • Visual impairment. Central vision can be variable, but most affected individuals have severe visual impairment (mean visual acuity of 20/126 measured in children ages four to ten years in largest case series) [Chung et al 2019]. While vision is relatively stable in the first decade of life, it begins to decline again starting in the teens.
    Fifty percent of affected individuals are legally blind (visual acuity of 20/200 and/or visual fields extending <20 degrees from fixation) by age 20 years. After age 20 years, vision loss is more rapidly progressive: all affected individuals are legally blind by the fourth decade and many have complete loss of vision (i.e., no light perception).
  • Other ophthalmic findings
    • Oculodigital sign (i.e., poking, rubbing, or pressing on the eye to stimulate phosphenes for visual perception) is occasionally observed but is not specific to RPE65-related LCA.
    • Late-stage findings can include keratoconus and cataract.
    • Refractive error is common; most affected individuals are myopic [Chung et al 2019].

RPE65-related EOSRD describes individuals whose manifestations begin slightly later than those of RPE65-related LCA, typically in early childhood rather than in infancy. Affected children often present with nyctalopia, reduced visual acuity, and lower electroretinogram responses. Fundus examination may show mottled retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) or early macular changes, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) often demonstrates reduced (but preserved) retinal structures. Central visual acuity and visual fields gradually decline. Although residual retinal function is often present in childhood, progressive degeneration occurs, and many individuals meet criteria for legal blindness in their fourth decade; some progress to profound visual loss (including no light perception) by mid-adulthood.

RPE65-related juvenile RP, representing the mildest end of the phenotypic spectrum, is characterized by a later onset of manifestations, typically in late childhood or adolescence. Individuals often present with nyctalopia, progressive peripheral visual field loss, and relatively preserved central visual acuity in earlier stages. Fundus findings may include subtle bone spicule-like pigmentation, vascular attenuation, or mottled RPE changes, while OCT scans commonly show a retained foveal structure with peripheral outer retinal thinning. Affected individuals frequently retain useful central vision into early adulthood, but peripheral visual field loss is progressive. Many meet the criteria for legal blindness by age 40-50 years, and some experience further decline in later decades, occasionally progressing to very poor vision, including no light perception.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Genotype-phenotype correlations in autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration do not allow reliable prediction of disease severity in an individual [Chung et al 2019]; however, certain variant classes have been associated with milder or more severe phenotypes.

The severe early-onset phenotypes (LCA and EOSRD) are more often associated with null variants (e.g., nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice).

RPE65-related EOSRD. Compared to LCA, EOSRD reflects partial retention of isomerohydrolase activity and is generally associated with biallelic missense or hypomorphic variants that allow some residual RPE65 function.

RPE65-related juvenile RP is most often associated with biallelic hypomorphic RPE65 variants that provide greater residual enzymatic activity, consistent with its slower progression and milder early presentation. Hypomorphic alleles (e.g., p.Arg91Trp and p.Ala132Thr) are observed in individuals with later-onset or milder disease, including juvenile-onset rod-cone dystrophy or fundus albipunctatus-like changes. Individuals with at least one such allele may retain useful central vision into adulthood (see Table 6) [Perrault et al 2004, de Freitas Cenachi et al 2025, Lorenz 2025].

Nomenclature

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and early-onset severe retinal degeneration (EOSRD) are clinical diagnoses that do not have well-agreed-upon definitions; consequently, different designations may be variably applied to an affected individual. With nomenclature moving away from clinical descriptive terms to gene-based terms, RPE65-related LCA/EOSRD is considered the more appropriate term for these phenotypes when caused by pathogenic variants in RPE65.

The term "autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration" encompasses RPE65-related LCA/EOSRD and RPE65-related juvenile RP [Lorenz 2025]. RPE65-related retinal degeneration may also be referred to as RPE65-related retinal dystrophy.

Prevalence

Autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration is rare. RPE65-related LCA/EOSRD is thought to account for approximately 3%-16% of LCA/EOSRD depending on the population studied [Sallum et al 2022, de Freitas Cenachi et al 2025, Lorenz 2025]. In the United States, this corresponds to an estimated 1,000-2,000 affected individuals.

RPE65-related juvenile RP represents approximately ~0.2%-4% of autosomal recessive RP [Sallum et al 2022].

Founder variants have been identified in a small Dutch isolate, in Costa Rica, and in the North African Jewish (Sephardic) population [Banin et al 2010] (see Table 6).

Management

No clinical practice guidelines for autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration have been published. In the absence of published guidelines, the following recommendations are based on the authors' personal experience managing individuals with this disorder.

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs of individuals diagnosed with autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration, the evaluations included in Table 3 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended, and their purpose summarized.

Note that some evaluations may be indicated only in individuals considering subretinal gene supplementation therapy (see Table 4).

Table 3.

Autosomal Recessive RPE65-Related Retinal Degeneration: Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

EvaluationPurpose
Ophthalmologic BCVA To determine visual acuity & provide baseline for comparison of future assessments
Refractive error To prescribe corrective lenses
Slit lamp exam To document anterior segment findings such as cataract
Indirect ophthalmoscopy To document fundus findings
Kinetic visual perimetry 1 (Goldmann perimetry) To map out entire visual field & provide baseline
Static visual perimetry 2 To determine retinal sensitivity in any given location in visual field & to provide baseline
OCT To assess anatomic structure of retina, which may identify persons more likely to benefit from RPE65 gene replacement therapy
Fundus photography To document fundus findings & provide baseline
FAF To assess presence of autofluorescent material in retina, which may serve as marker for retinal health
Full-field ERG To assess residual activity of rods (dark-adapted [i.e., scotopic] ERG) & cones (light-adapted [i.e., photopic] ERG)
FST test 3 As baseline in persons w/advanced inherited retinal disorders & to determine level of rod- & cone-mediated function for comparison w/future FST tests
Multiluminance mobility 4 To assess functional vision by determining minimum luminance at which person can complete standard course successfully
Developmental assessment To assess motor, adaptive, cognitive & speech-language and evaluate for early intervention / special education
Neurobehavioral/
Psychiatric
To evaluate for issues based on sensory loss (i.e., blindness)
Genetic counseling 5 To obtain a pedigree & inform affected persons & their families re nature, MOI, & implications of RPE65-related RD to facilitate medical & personal decision making
Family support & resources 6 Assessment of family & social structure to determine need for:
  • Use of community vision services through Early Intervention or School District
  • Use of community or online resources such as Parent To Parent
  • Need for social work involvement for parental support and to connect families with local resources

BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; ERG = electroretinogram; FAF = fundus autofluorescence; FST = full-field stimulus threshold; MOI = mode of inheritance; OCT = optical coherence tomography; RD = retinal degeneration

1.

Kinetic visual field testing uses moving targets of various light sizes and intensities to map out the entire visual field, as well as the blind spot and any scotomas (decreased areas of vision). This type of testing is useful for mapping visual field sensitivity boundaries.

2.

Static visual field testing systematically plots the field of vision using threshold testing with flashing light presentations of various intensities. This type of testing allows the determination of retinal sensitivity in any given location.

3.
4.
5.

By clinical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, certified genetic nurse, genetics advanced practice provider (nurse practitioner or physician assistant)

6.

By clinicians, wider care team, & family support organizations

Treatment of Manifestations

Targeted Therapy

In GeneReviews, a targeted therapy is one that addresses the specific underlying mechanism of disease causation (regardless of whether the therapy is significantly efficacious for one or more manifestation of the genetic condition); would otherwise not be considered without knowledge of the underlying genetic cause of the condition; or could lead to a cure. —ED

Targeted therapy is available for individuals ages 12 months to 65 years with retinal degeneration phenotypes (i.e., Leber congenital amaurosis [LCA], early-onset severe retinal dystrophy [EOSRD], and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa [RP]) known to be associated with biallelic RPE65 pathogenic variants (see Table 4).

Table 4.

Autosomal Recessive RPE65-Related Retinal Degeneration: Targeted Therapy

TreatmentDosageConsiderations
Voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (AAV vector-based gene supplementation therapy)The recommended dose is 1.5 × 1011 vector genomes in 0.3 mL per eye, administered subretinally on separate days ≥6 days apart. 1Requirements for consideration of subretinal gene supplementation therapy:
  • Age 12 months to 65 years
  • Presence of biallelic pathogenic RPE65 variants
  • Ophthalmic eval that includes many of the evals in Table 3, esp OCT, as individuals with evidence of viable photoreceptors identified by this test may benefit from gene supplementation therapy

AAV = adeno-associated virus; OCT = optical coherence tomography

1.

See package insert at www​.fda.gov/media/109906/download (pdf).

Subretinal gene supplementation therapy. Autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration subretinal gene supplementation therapy does not replace the native gene (which may still have some function) but provides a functional copy of the gene using recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors to the cells that produce the RPE65-encoded protein product, retinoid isomerohydrolase. In this way, the functional copy of the gene compensates for the loss-of-function RPE65 pathogenic variants and increases the amount of the protein product. Long-term studies confirm that therapy increases visual function, stabilizes retinal structure, and may extend useful vision into adulthood [Daruich et al 2025, Lorenz 2025, Tayyib et al 2025].

Using standard vitreoretinal surgical techniques, the AAV vectors are injected in each eye one time only subretinally (i.e., under the retina) in the foveal region (i.e., the cone-rich portion of the retina that mediates central vision).

Multiple recent large-scale studies have confirmed the efficacy and durability of subretinal voretigene neparvovec-rzyl. Lorenz [2025] reported sustained improvements in functional vision and retinal sensitivity up to 7.5 years post treatment. Tayyib et al [2025] demonstrated clinically meaningful gains in both pediatric and adult cohorts, with younger age and greater baseline photoreceptor preservation predicting the best outcomes. Daruich et al [2025] analyzed European registry data and confirmed real-world efficacy, while also highlighting safety issues including inflammation, cataract, and progressive chorioretinal atrophy.

Supportive Care

Diet and micronutrients. Individuals with any type of inherited retinal dystrophy are advised to eat a healthy balanced diet to reach the minimum reference daily intake (RDI) for nutrients (see D Hoffman - Visions 2016 [pdf]). The RDI can include one to two servings of omega-3 fatty acid-rich fish, as well as antioxidant- and lutein-rich foods such as dark green leafy vegetables. Docosahexaenoic acid / eicosapentaenoic acid supplements up to 500 mg/day as well as lutein supplements up to 10 mg/day can be considered if dietary intake is not sufficient.

Use of illumination devices. Due to poor night vision, affected individuals are advised to use a flashlight for illumination.

Educational Issues

Children with autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration are usually of normal intellect but may experience learning delays due to visual impairment. Those who have learning difficulties benefit from referral to a developmental pediatrician and enrollment in a continuing program of care and support.

Advice on learning / intellectual disability / educational issues will vary from country to country, or even region to region within a country, depending on support services available. Overarching principles should include the following:

  • Involving child development and educational specialists at the earliest available opportunity, often with specialist teachers/schools for the visually impaired
  • Early referral to low vision services to access low visual aids, especially with improving technologies, such as the refreshable Braille display
  • As individuals grow older, identifying further assistance including financial and/or employment (available in some countries through certification/registration processes)
  • Registration with services to record population data on the causes and effects of visual impairment (available in some countries)

The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability / educational issues in the United States.

Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, and speech, as well as infant mental health services, special educators and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to provide individual therapy needs.

Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies, and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, and social delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; home-based services are provided as needed.

All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies (US) and to support parents. Some issues to consider:

  • An IEP provides specially designed instruction and related services to children who qualify.
    • Special education law requires that children participating in an IEP be in the least restrictive environment feasible at school and included in general education as much as possible, when and where appropriate.
    • Vision and hearing consultants should be a part of the child's IEP team to support access to academic material.
    • As a child enters teen years, a transition plan should be discussed and incorporated in the IEP. For those receiving IEP services, the public school district is required to provide services until age 21.
  • A 504 plan (Section 504: a US federal statute that prohibits discrimination based on disability) can be considered for those who require accommodations or modifications such as front-of-class seating, assistive technology devices, classroom scribes, extra time between classes, modified assignments, and enlarged text.

Social/Behavioral Concerns

Children who are legally blind may have difficulty integrating and socializing with peers in school. Children may qualify for and benefit from interventions used in treatment of autism spectrum disorder, including applied behavior analysis (ABA). ABA therapy is targeted to the individual child's behavioral, social, and adaptive strengths and weaknesses and is typically performed one on one with a board-certified behavior analyst.

Consultation with a developmental pediatrician may be helpful in guiding parents through appropriate behavior management strategies or providing prescription medications, such as medication used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), when necessary.

Surveillance

To monitor existing manifestations, the individual's response to supportive care, and the emergence of new manifestations, the evaluations summarized in Table 5 are recommended. Note: No consensus surveillance guidelines exist; the intervals shown are based on expert opinion and clinical practice.

Table 5.

Autosomal Recessive RPE65-Related Retinal Degeneration: Recommended Surveillance

EvaluationPurposeFrequency
Ophthalmologic BCVA To assess visual acuityYearly
Refractive error To assess changes in refractive error that would require change to corrective lenses
Slit lamp exam To assess anterior segment changes such as cataract
Indirect ophthalmoscopy To assess fundus findings, which may identify disease progression
Kinetic visual perimetry To assess changes in entire visual fieldYearly if possible
Static visual perimetry To assess changes in retinal sensitivity in any given location in visual fieldYearly
OCT To assess anatomic structure of retina, which may identify disease progression
Fundus photography To document fundus changes, which may identify disease progressionYearly if possible
FAF To document changes in native autofluorescent pigments to assess health of retina
Full-field ERG To assess residual activity of rods (dark-adapted [scotopic] ERG) & cones (light-adapted [photopic] ERG)Every 3-5 yrs
FST test To quantify residual photoreceptor function
Other Developmental/educational assessment To assess developmental/educational needsYearly or as needed
Neurobehavioral/psychiatric assessment To assess need for psychiatric or behavioral therapy
Family support & resources To assess need for additional family resources or other support groups

BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; ERG = electroretinogram; FAF = fundus autofluorescence; FST = full-field stimulus threshold; OCT = optical coherence tomography

Agents/Circumstances to Avoid

Children should be discouraged whenever possible from repeatedly poking and pressing on their eyes, which may cause damage to the cornea and/or retina.

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

It is appropriate to clarify the genetic status of apparently unaffected older and younger at-risk sibs in order to identify those who have biallelic RPE65 pathogenic variants and may benefit from early evaluation, counseling, and timely consideration of gene supplementation therapy.

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Clinical investigations of variations of the FDA-approved gene replacement therapy treatment for autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration (i.e., subretinal injection of an AAV2 vector expressing full-length RPE65-encoded protein, retinoid isomerohydrolase) have been completed. A Phase I/IIb clinical trial (NCT02781480) of an AAV2/5 vector with codon-optimized RPE65 has been completed, but no peer-reviewed outcomes have yet been published.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

RPE65-related Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD), and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa (RP) – collectively referred to as autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration – are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.

Parents of a proband

Sibs of a proband

  • If both parents of a child diagnosed with autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration are known to be heterozygous for an RPE65 pathogenic variant, each sib of an affected individual has at conception a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of being unaffected and not a carrier.
  • Heterozygous sibs of a proband with autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration are not at risk of developing autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration.

Offspring of a proband. Unless an affected individual's reproductive partner also has autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration or is a carrier, offspring will be obligate heterozygotes (carriers) for a pathogenic variant in RPE65.

Other family members. Each sib of the proband's parents is at a 50% risk of being a carrier of an RPE65 pathogenic variant.

Carrier Detection

Carrier testing for at-risk relatives requires prior identification of the RPE65 pathogenic variants in the family.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

See Management, Evaluation of Relatives at Risk for information on evaluating at-risk sibs for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment.

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected, are carriers, or are at risk of being carriers.
  • Carrier testing should be considered for the reproductive partners of known carriers and for the reproductive partners of individuals affected with autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration, particularly if both partners are of the same ancestry. Founder variants associated with autosomal recessive RPE65-related retinal degeneration have been identified in several populations (see Table 6).

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the RPE65 pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing. While most health care professionals would consider use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A.

Autosomal Recessive RPE65-Related Retinal Degeneration: Genes and Databases

GeneChromosome LocusProteinLocus-Specific DatabasesHGMDClinVar
RPE651p31​.3Retinoid isomerohydrolaseRPE65 @ LOVDRPE65RPE65

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from HGNC; chromosome locus from OMIM; protein from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click here.

Table B.

OMIM Entries for Autosomal Recessive RPE65-Related Retinal Degeneration (View All in OMIM)

180069RETINOID ISOMEROHYDROLASE RPE65; RPE65
204100LEBER CONGENITAL AMAUROSIS 2; LCA2

Molecular Pathogenesis

Normally, photoreceptors sense light through the isomerization of the visual chromophore 11-cis retinal to all-trans retinal by photons of light. This chromophore binds rod and cone opsins to form rhodopsin and other visual pigments and plays an essential part of photo transduction. All-trans retinal then needs to be converted back to 11-cis retinal for continued phototransduction via a pathway called the visual cycle. Retinoid isomerohydrolase, encoded by RPE65, is a key rate-limiting enzyme required for the regeneration of 11-cis retinal from all-trans retinal. Without retinoid isomerohydrolase function, 11-cis retinal cannot be regenerated from all-trans retinal, resulting in lack of phototransduction in photoreceptors as well as subsequent retinal degeneration, presumably due to accumulation of retinyl esters.

Mechanism of disease causation. Most RPE65 pathogenic variants are loss-of-function alleles that result in absent or severely reduced enzymatic activity, causing autosomal recessive disease.

Table 6.

RPE65 Pathogenic Variants Referenced in This GeneReview

Reference SequencesDNA Nucleotide
Change
(Alias 1)
Predicted Protein ChangeComment [Reference]
NM_000329​.3
NP_000320​.1
c.1103A>G
(c.T1156C)
p.Tyr368HisFounder variant in a small Dutch isolate [Yzer et al 2003]
c.292_311del20p.Ile98HisfsTer26Founder variants in Costa Rica [Glen et al 2019]
c.242G>Tp.Arg81Ile
c.419G>Ap.Gly140Glu
c.1338G>Tp.Arg446Ser
NM_000329​.3 c.95-2A>T
(IVS2-2A>T)
--Founder variant in North African Jewish (Sephardic) population [Banin et al 2010]
NM_000329​.3
NP_000320​.1
c.271C>Tp.Arg91TrpHypomorphic variants associated w/later-onset phenotypes [Perrault et al 2004, de Freitas Cenachi et al 2025]
c.394G>Ap.Ala132Thr

Variants listed in the table have been provided by the authors. GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.

GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen​.hgvs.org). See Quick Reference for an explanation of nomenclature.

1.

Variant designation that does not conform to current naming conventions

Chapter Notes

Author Notes

Dr Mark Pennesi is the Director of the Inherited Retinal Degeneration division at the Retina Foundation in Dallas, Texas, and an Adjunct Professor of Ophthalmology at Oregon Health and Science University's Casey Eye Institute in Portland, Oregon.

Brooke Koritala is a Clinical Research Assistant at the Retina Foundation in Dallas, Texas. Her research focuses on pediatric ophthalmology and the lived experiences of children with eye conditions. Current projects focus on quality of life in children with inherited retinal diseases and pediatric cataracts.

Author History

Amanda Burr, MS, CGC; Oregon Health & Science University (2019-2026)
Daniel L Chao, MD, PhD; University of California, San Diego (2019-2026)
Brooke A Koritala, BS, BA (2026-present)
Mark Pennesi, MD, PhD (2019-present)

Revision History

  • 8 January 2026 (bp) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 14 November 2019 (bp) Review posted live
  • 26 March 2019 (dc) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • Al-Gazali L, Ali BR. Mutations of a country: a mutation review of single gene disorders in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Hum Mutat. 2010;31:505-20. [PubMed: 20437613]
  • Banin E, Bandah-Rozenfeld D, Obolensky A, Cideciyan AV, Aleman TS, Marks-Ohana D, Sela M, Boye S, Sumaroka A, Roman AJ, Schwartz SB, Hauswirth WW, Jacobson SG, Hemo I, Sharon D. Molecular anthropology meets genetic medicine to treat blindness in the North African Jewish population: human gene therapy initiated in Israel. Hum Gene Ther. 2010;21:1749-57. [PubMed: 20604683]
  • Chung DC, Bertelsen M, Lorenz B, Pennesi ME, Leroy BP, Hamel CP, Pierce E, Sallum J, Larsen M, Stieger K, Preising M, Weleber R, Yang P, Place E, Liu E, Schaefer G, DiStefano-Pappas J, Elci OU, McCague S, Wellman JA, High KA, Reape KZ. The natural history of inherited retinal dystrophy due to biallelic mutations in the RPE65 gene. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;199:58-70. [PMC free article: PMC6445969] [PubMed: 30268864]
  • Chung DC, Mccague S, Yu ZF, Thill S, Distefano-Pappas J, Bennett J, Cross D, Marshall K, Wellman J, High KA. Novel mobility test to assess functional vision in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46:247-59. [PMC free article: PMC5764825] [PubMed: 28697537]
  • Cideciyan AV. Leber congenital amaurosis due to RPE65 mutations and its treatment with gene therapy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:398-427. [PMC free article: PMC2903652] [PubMed: 20399883]
  • Cideciyan AV, Jacobson SG, Beltran WA, Sumaroka A, Swider M, Iwabe S, Roman AJ, Olivares MB, Schwartz SB, Komaromy AM, Hauswirth WW, Aguirre GD. Human retinal gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis shows advancing retinal degeneration despite enduring visual improvement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E517-25. [PMC free article: PMC3568385] [PubMed: 23341635]
  • Daruich A, Rateaux M, Batté E, de Vergnes N, Valleix S, Robert MP, Bremond Gignac D. 12-month outcomes after voretigene neparvovec gene therapy in paediatric patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2025;109:281-5. [PMC free article: PMC11866291] [PubMed: 39578019]
  • de Freitas Cenachi SP, Frasson M, Mares V, Arantes RR, Albuquerque ALB, Marques Nascentes AL, De Marco LAC, Nehemy MB. Genetics and phenotypes of RPE65 mutations in inherited retinal degeneration: a study from a tertiary eye care center in Brazil. Mol Vis. 2025;31:45-54. [PMC free article: PMC12085217] [PubMed: 40384766]
  • Glen WB Jr, Peterseim MMW, Badilla R, Znoyko I, Bourg A, Wilson R, Hardiman G, Wolff D, Martinez J. A high prevalence of biallelic RPE65 mutations in Costa Rican children with Leber congenital amaurosis and early-onset retinal dystrophy. Ophthalmic Genet. 2019;40:110-7. [PubMed: 30870047]
  • Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178-81. [PMC free article: PMC4638169] [PubMed: 1957169]
  • Huang Y, Cideciyan AV, Papastergiou GI, Banin E, Semple-Rowland SL, Milam AH, Jacobson SG. Relation of optical coherence tomography to microanatomy in normal and rd chickens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2405-16. [PubMed: 9804149]
  • Hull S, Mukherjee R, Holder GE, Moore AT, Webster AR. The clinical features of retinal disease due to a dominant mutation in RPE65. Mol Vis. 2016;22:626-35 [PMC free article: PMC4901053] [PubMed: 27307694]
  • Jacobson SG, Aleman TS, Cideciyan AV, Heon E, Golczak M, Beltran WA, Sumaroka A, Schwartz SB, Roman AJ, Windsor EA, Wilson JM, Aguirre GD, Stone EM, Palczewski K. Human cone photoreceptor dependence on RPE65 isomerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15123-8. [PMC free article: PMC1986623] [PubMed: 17848510]
  • Jacobson SG, Aleman TS, Cideciyan AV, Sumaroka A, Schwartz SB, Windsor EA, Traboulsi EI, Heon E, Pittler SJ, Milam AH, Maguire AM, Palczewski K, Stone EM, Bennett J. Identifying photoreceptors in blind eyes caused by RPE65 mutations: prerequisite for human gene therapy success. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:6177-82. [PMC free article: PMC1087926] [PubMed: 15837919]
  • Jauregui R, Park KS, Tsang SH. Two-year progression analysis of RPE65 autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmic Genet. 2018;39:544-9 [PMC free article: PMC6314189] [PubMed: 29947567]
  • Jónsson H, Sulem P, Kehr B, Kristmundsdottir S, Zink F, Hjartarson E, Hardarson MT, Hjorleifsson KE, Eggertsson HP, Gudjonsson SA, Ward LD, Arnadottir GA, Helgason EA, Helgason H, Gylfason A, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, Rafnar T, Frigge M, Stacey SN, Th Magnusson O, Thorsteinsdottir U, Masson G, Kong A, Halldorsson BV, Helgason A, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson K. Parental influence on human germline de novo mutations in 1,548 trios from Iceland. Nature. 2017;549:519-22. [PubMed: 28959963]
  • Lee H, Moon D, Khang R, Seo GH, Yoon CK, Park UC, Park KH, Lee EK. A Korean patient with Leber congenital amaurosis and a homozygous RPE65 variant originating from a paternal uniparental isodisomy. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2025;13:e70060. [PMC free article: PMC11748124] [PubMed: 39835736]
  • Lorenz B. Long-term experience with gene augmentation therapy in patients with inherited retinal disease associated with biallelic mutations in RPE65. Med Genet. 2025;37:47-56. [PMC free article: PMC11812477] [PubMed: 39943983]
  • Lorenz B, Wabbels B, Wegscheider E, Hamel CP, Drexler W, Preising MN. Lack of fundus autofluorescence to 488 nanometers from childhood on in patients with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy associated with mutations in RPE65. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1585-94. [PubMed: 15288992]
  • Maeda T, Cideciyan AV, Maeda A, Golczak M, Aleman TS, Jacobson SG, Palczewski K. Loss of cone photoreceptors caused by chromophore depletion is partially prevented by the artificial chromophore pro-drug, 9-cis-retinyl acetate. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:2277-87. [PMC free article: PMC2685761] [PubMed: 19339306]
  • Morimura H, Fishman GA, Grover SA, Fulton AB, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Mutations in the RPE65 gene in patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa or Leber congenital amaurosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:3088-93. [PMC free article: PMC19699] [PubMed: 9501220]
  • Perrault I, Hanein S, Gerber S, Barbet F, Ducroq D, Dollfus H, Hamel C, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Kaplan J, Rozet JM. Retinal dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12) mutations in leber congenital amaurosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:639-46. [PMC free article: PMC1182050] [PubMed: 15322982]
  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405-24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]
  • Sallum JMF, Kaur VP, Shaikh J, Banhazi J, Spera C, Aouadj C, Viriato D, Fischer MD. Epidemiology of mutations in the 65-kDa retinal pigment epithelium (RPE65) gene-mediated inherited retinal dystrophies: a systematic literature review. Adv Ther. 2022;39:1179-98. [PMC free article: PMC8918161] [PubMed: 35098484]
  • Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Chapman M, Evans K, Azevedo L, Hayden M, Heywood S, Millar DS, Phillips AD, Cooper DN. The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®): optimizing its use in a clinical diagnostic or research setting. Hum Genet. 2020;139:1197-207. [PMC free article: PMC7497289] [PubMed: 32596782]
  • Tayyib A, Parameswarappa DC, Kertes PJ, Muni R, Tumber A, Costain G, Schramm A, MacDonald H, Klatt R, Vincent A, Héon E. Insights into the effects of subretinal voretigene neparvovec-rzyl in RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis. Can J Ophthalmol. 2025;60:252-58. [PubMed: 39828244]
  • Thompson DA, Gyürüs P, Fleischer LL, Bingham EL, McHenry CL, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E, Lorenz B, Richards JE, Jacobson SG, Sieving PA, Gal A. Genetics and phenotypes of RPE65 mutations in inherited retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:4293-9. [PubMed: 11095629]
  • Vooren EV, den Broeck FV, Mahieu Q, Geens E, Heetvelde MV, De Bruyne M, de Sompele SV, Uppal S, Poliakov E, Dhaenens CM, Gregory-Evans CY, Hoefsloot L, Gonzalez AI, Kohl S, Zuleger T, Demaret T, Dominant RPEpC, Tuupanen S, Ruys J, Os LV, Platteau E, Jacob J, Vermeer S, Postelmans L, Dahan K, Maystadt I, Rasquin F, Thiadens A, Stephenson KAJ, Sheri N, Smirnov V, MacDonald IM, Gregory-Evans K, Redmond TM, De Zaeytijd J, Leroy BP, Bauwens M, De Baere E. RPE65 variant p.(E519K) causes a novel dominant adult-onset maculopathy in 83 affected individuals. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2025. [PMC free article: PMC12468096] [PubMed: 40985799]
  • Yzer S, Van Den Born LI, Schuil J, Kroes HY, Van Genderen MM, Boonstra FN, Van Den Helm B, Brunner HG, Koenekoop RK, Cremers FPM. Tyr368His RPE65 founder mutation is associated with variable expression and progression of early onset retinal dystrophy in 10 families of a genetically isolated population. J Med Genet. 2003;40:709-13. [PMC free article: PMC1735582] [PubMed: 12960219]
Copyright © 1993-2026, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved. Test.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (https://www.genereviews.org) and copyright (© 1993-2026 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: addmast@wu.edu

Bookshelf ID: NBK549574PMID: 31725251

Views

Key Sections in This GeneReview

Tests in GTR by Gene

Related information

  • OMIM
    Related OMIM records
  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed
  • Gene
    Locus Links

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...