NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cover of Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Evidence Synthesis, No. 174

Investigators: , MD, MPH, , MD, , MPH, , MS, , BA, and , PharmD.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); .
Report No.: 18-05245-EF-1

Structured Abstract

Background:

In 2006, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) found insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening for elevated blood lead levels in asymptomatic children ages 1 to 5 years who are at increased risk for lead poisoning (I recommendation), and recommended against routine screening in those at average risk (D recommendation).

Purpose:

To synthesize evidence on the effects of screening, testing, and treatment for elevated blood lead levels in children age 5 years and younger in the primary care setting, to update a prior USPSTF review on screening for elevated blood lead levels in childhood.

Data Sources:

Cochrane CENTRAL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through June 2018), and Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to June 2018), reference lists, and surveillance through December 5, 2018.

Study Selection:

English-language trials and observational studies of screening effectiveness, test accuracy, and benefits and harms of screening and interventions in asymptomatic children age 5 years and younger.

Data Extraction:

One investigator abstracted details about study design, patient population, setting, screening method, followup, and results. Two investigators independently applied prespecified criteria to rate study quality using methods developed by the USPSTF. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus.

Data Synthesis (Results):

A total of 22 studies were included in this review (N=10,449). No studies directly evaluated clinical benefits or harms of screening versus not screening children for elevated blood lead levels. More than one positive answer on the five-item 1991 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention screening questionnaire was associated with a pooled sensitivity of 48 percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.4% to 65.6%) and specificity of 58 percent (95% CI, 39.9% to 74.0%) for identifying children with a venous blood level greater than 10 µg/dL (5 studies; N=2,265). Adapted versions of the questionnaire did not demonstrate improved accuracy. Capillary blood lead testing demonstrated sensitivity of 87 to 91 percent and specificity greater than 90 percent, compared with venous measurement (4 studies; N=1,431). Counseling and nutritional interventions or residential lead hazard control techniques did not reduce blood lead concentrations in asymptomatic children, but studies were few and had methodological limitations (7 studies; N=1,419). A trial of dimercaptosuccinic acid chelation therapy found reduced blood lead levels in children at 1 week to 1 year but not at 4.5 to 6 years (N=780), while another trial found no effect at 1 and 6 months (N=39). Seven-year followup assessments showed no effect on neuropsychological development; a small deficit in linear growth (height difference at 7 years in treated patients, 1.17 cm [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.93 cm]) and poorer cognitive outcomes reported as the Attention and Executive Functions subscore of the Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment (unadjusted difference, −1.8 [95% CI, −4.5 to 1.0]; adjusted P=0.045) in children treated with dimercaptosuccinic acid chelation.

Limitations:

Limited to English-language articles; quality and applicability of studies were limited due to study design, poor reporting of statistical outcomes, and loss to followup. Studies were lacking on the effectiveness of screening or treatments in reducing elevated blood lead levels or improving health outcomes in children. There was no direct evidence on the harms of screening children for elevated blood lead levels.

Conclusions:

Evidence on the benefits and harms of screening children for elevated blood lead levels is lacking. Screening questionnaires are not accurate for identifying children with elevated blood lead levels. Capillary blood testing is slightly less accurate than venous blood testing for identification of elevated blood lead levels. Treatment studies of chelating agents, often combined with environmental or household interventions, were not associated with sustained effects on blood lead levels but were associated with harms.

Contents

Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; www.ahrq.gov Contract No. HHSA-290-2015-00009-I, Task Order No. 7 Prepared by: Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: BICC, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239; www.ohsu.edu/epc

Suggested citation:

Cantor A, Hendrickson R, Blazina I, Griffin J, Grusing S, McDonagh M. Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis No. 174. AHRQ Publication No. 18-05245-EF-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2019.

This report is based on research conducted by the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. HHSA-290-2015-00009-I, Task Order No. 7). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The information in this report is intended to help health care decisionmakers—patients and clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers, among others—make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information (i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients).

This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.

None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report.

Bookshelf ID: NBK540602PMID: 31034189

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.6M)

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...