U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Sinclair A, Peprah K, Quay T, et al. Optimal Strategies for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Health Technology Assessment [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2018 Jan. (CADTH Optimal Use Report, No. 6.3b.)

Cover of Optimal Strategies for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Health Technology Assessment

Optimal Strategies for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Health Technology Assessment [Internet].

Show details

References

1.
Sadigh G, Kelly A, Cronin P. Challenges, controversies, and hot topics in pulmonary embolism imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2016 Jul 19];196(3):497–515. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.10.5830 [PubMed: 21343491] [CrossRef]
2.
Ma Y, Yan S, Zhou L, Yuan DT. Competitive assessments of pulmonary embolism: noninvasiveness versus the gold standard. Vascular. 2016;24(2):217–24. [PubMed: 26038123]
3.
Thompson B. Patient education: pulmonary embolism (beyond the basics). In: Post TW, editor. UpToDate [Internet]. Waltham (MA): UpToDate; 2016 [cited 2016 Sep 9]. Available from: http://www​.uptodate.com​/contents/pulmonary-embolism-beyond-the-basics Subscription required.
4.
Tapson VF. Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 6;358(10):1037–52. [PubMed: 18322285]
5.
Moser KM, Fedullo PF, LitteJohn JK, Crawford R. Frequent asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in patients with deep venous thrombosis. JAMA. 1994 Jan 19;271(3):223–5. [PubMed: 8277550]
6.
Sweet PH, III, Armstrong T, Chen J, Masliah E, Witucki P. Fatal pulmonary embolism update: 10 years of autopsy experience at an academic medical center. JRSM Short Rep [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 Aug 17];4(9). Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767072 [PMC free article: PMC3767072] [PubMed: 24040503]
7.
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Detection of pulmonary embolsim [Internet]. Ottawa: CADTH; 2012. [cited 2016 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/resources/detection-pulmonary-embolism
8.
Masotti L, Ray P, Righini M, Le GG, Antonelli F, Landini G, et al Pulmonary embolism in the elderly: a review on clinical, instrumental and laboratory presentation. Vasc Health Risk Manag [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2016 Sep 9];4(3):629–36. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2515422 [PMC free article: PMC2515422] [PubMed: 18827912]
9.
Kline JA, Hernandez-Nino J, Jones AE, Rose GA, Norton HJ, Camargo CA, Jr. Prospective study of the clinical features and outcomes of emergency department patients with delayed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jul;14(7):592–8. [PubMed: 17554011]
10.
Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De RM. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet. 1999 Apr 24;353(9162):1386–9. [PubMed: 10227218]
11.
Laporte S, Mismetti P, Decousus H, Uresandi F, Otero R, Lobo JL, et al Clinical predictors for fatal pulmonary embolism in 15,520 patients with venous thromboembolism: findings from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE) Registry. Circulation. 2008 Apr 1;117(13):1711–6. [PubMed: 18347212]
12.
Thaler J, Pabinger I, Ay C. Anticoagulant Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: The Present State of the Art. Front Cardiovasc Med [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Aug 8];2:30. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671349 [PMC free article: PMC4671349] [PubMed: 26664901]
13.
Pollack CV, Schreiber D, Goldhaber SZ, Slattery D, Fanikos J, O’Neil BJ, et al Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 8;57(6):700–6. [PubMed: 21292129]
14.
Konstantinides SV. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2014 Dec 1 [cited 2016 Aug 9];35(45):3145–6. Available from: http://eurheartj​.oxfordjournals​.org/content/ehj/35/45/3145​.full.pdf [PubMed: 25452462]
15.
White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23 Suppl 1):I4–I8. [PubMed: 12814979]
16.
Skinner S. Pulmonary embolism: assessment and imaging. Aust Fam Physician [Internet]. 2013;42(9):628–32. Available from: http://www​.racgp.org​.au/download/Documents​/AFP/2013/Sep/201309skinner.pdf [PubMed: 24024223]
17.
Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23 Suppl):I22–I30. [PubMed: 12814982]
18.
Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton LJ, III. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 15;143(10):697–706. [PubMed: 16287790]
19.
Pasha SM, Klok FA, Snoep JD, Mos IC, Goekoop RJ, Rodger MA, et al Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125(4):e123–e127. [PubMed: 19942258]
20.
Boka K. Pulmonary embolism clinical scoring systems [Internet]. New York: Medscape; 2015. [cited 2016 Jul 20]. Available from: http://emedicine​.medscape​.com/article/1918940-overview
21.
Raja AS, Greenberg JO, Qaseem A, Denberg TD, Fitterman N, Schuur JD, et al Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):701–11. [PubMed: 26414967]
22.
Kabrhel C, Camargo CA, Jr., Goldhaber SZ. Clinical gestalt and the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: does experience matter? Chest. 2005 May;127(5):1627–30. [PubMed: 15888838]
23.
Thompson BT. Clinical presentation, evaluation, and diagnosis of the adult with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. In: Post TW, editor. UpToDate [Internet]. Waltham (MA): UpToDate; 2016 Aug 8 [cited 2016 Nov 23]. Available from: www​.uptodate.com Subscription required.
24.
Shen JH, Chen HL, Chen JR, Xing JL, Gu P, Zhu BF. Comparison of the Wells score with the revised Geneva score for assessing suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Apr;41(3):482–92. [PubMed: 26178041]
25.
Wang RC, Bent S, Weber E, Neilson J, Smith-Bindman R, Fahimi J. The Impact of Clinical Decision Rules on Computed Tomography Use and Yield for Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;67(6):693–701. [PubMed: 26747217]
26.
Lucassen W, Geersing GJ, Erkens PM, Reitsma JB, Moons KG, Büller H, et al Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):448–60. [PubMed: 21969343]
27.
Screaton NJ, Karia S. Commentary on “Ten years of imaging for pulmonary embolism: too many scans or the tip of an iceberg?”. Clin Radiol. 2016;70:1355–6. [PubMed: 26432662]
28.
Riley RS, Gilbert AR, Dalton JB, Pai S, McPherson RA. Widely Used Types and Clinical Applications of D-Dimer Assay. Lab Med. 2016 May;47(2):90–102. [PubMed: 27016528]
29.
Geersing GJ, Janssen KJ, Oudega R, Bax L, Hoes AW, Reitsma JB, et al Excluding venous thromboembolism using point of care D-dimer tests in outpatients: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Bmj [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2016 Jul 8];339:b2990. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2727580 [PMC free article: PMC2727580] [PubMed: 19684102]
30.
Lucassen WA, Erkens PM, Geersing GJ, Buller HR, Moons KG, Stoffers HE, et al Qualitative point-of-care D-dimer testing compared with quantitative D-dimer testing in excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care. J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jun;13(6):1004–9. [PubMed: 25845618]
31.
Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, Richman PB, Courtney DM. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost [Internet]. 2004 Aug [cited 2017 Jun 1];2(8):1247–55. Available from: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00790.x/abstract [PubMed: 15304025] [CrossRef]
32.
Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, et al 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2014 Nov 14 [cited 2016 Aug 12];35(43):3033–69. Available from: http://eurheartj​.oxfordjournals​.org/content/ehj/35/43/3033​.full.pdf [PubMed: 25173341]
33.
Da Costa Rodrigues J, Alzuphar S, Combescure C, Le Gal G, Perrier A. Diagnostic characteristics of lower limb venous compression ultrasonography in suspected pulmonary embolism: a metaanalysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Sep;14(9):1765–72. [PubMed: 27377039]
34.
Squizzato A, Galli L, Gerdes V. Point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism [Internet]. Crit Ultrasound J. 2016 [cited 2016 Jul 20];7(7). Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC4447771/pdf/13089_2015_Article_25​.pdf
35.
Van der Pol LM, Mairuhu ATA, Tromeur C, Couturaud F, Huisman MV, Klok FA. Use of clinical prediction rules and D-dimer tests in the diagnostic management of pregnant patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Blood Rev. 2017 Mar;31(2):31–36. [PubMed: 27720446]
36.
Smith C, Mensah A, Mal S, Worster A. Is pretest probability assessment on emergency department patients with suspected venous thromboembolism documented before SimpliRED D-dimer testing? CJEM. 2008 Nov;10(6):519–23. [PubMed: 19000347]
37.
Corwin MT, Donohoo JH, Partridge R, Egglin TK, Mayo-Smith WW. Do emergency physicians use serum D-dimer effectively to determine the need for CT when evaluating patients for pulmonary embolism? Review of 5,344 consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1319–23. [PubMed: 19380556]
38.
Choosing Wisely. [Internet]. Philadelphia (PA): ABIM Foundation. Avoid CT pulmonary angiography in emergency department patients with a low pretest probability of pulmonary embolism and either a negative Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC) or a negative D-dimer; 2014 Oct 27 [cited 2016 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www​.choosingwisely​.org/clinician-lists​/acep-ct-pulmonary-angiography-in-ed-patients/
39.
Emergency medicine: ten things physicians and patients should question [Internet]. Toronto (ON): Choosing Wisely Canada; 2017. [cited 2017 Oct 16]. Available from: https:​//choosingwiselycanada​.org/emergency-medicine/ Question 7.
40.
Dogan H, DE RA, Geleijins J, Huisman MV, Kroft LJ. The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute and chronic pulmonary embolism. Diagn Interv Radiol [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2016 Aug 8];21(4):307–16. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498425 [PMC free article: PMC4498425] [PubMed: 26133321]
41.
van Beek EJ, Brouwerst EM, Song B, Stein PD, Oudkerk M. Clinical validity of a normal pulmonary angiogram in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism--a critical review. Clin Radiol. 2001 Oct;56(10):838–42. [PubMed: 11895301]
42.
Canadian medical imaging inventory [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): CADTH; 2016 Mar 31. [cited 2017 Jul 27]. Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca/imaginginventory
43.
Computed tomography [Internet]. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization (WHO); 2017. [cited 2017 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www​.who.int/diagnostic_imaging​/imaging_modalities​/dim_comptomography/en/
44.
Ionizing radiation in pregnant women: a review of the safety and guidelines [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): CADTH; 2015 Jun 9. [cited 2017 Jul 27]. (CADTH rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal). Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/sites/default/files​/pdf/htis/june-2015/RC0665-IonizingRadiation-Pregnancy-Final.pdf [PubMed: 26180866]
45.
Radiation emissions from computed tomography: a review of the risk of cancer and guidelines [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): CADTH; 2014 Jun 4. [cited 2017 Jul 27]. (CADTH rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal). Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/sites/default/files​/pdf/htis/jul-2014/RC0558​%20CT%20Radiation​%20Emission%20Final.pdf [PubMed: 25535640]
46.
Magnetic resonance imaging [Internet]. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization (WHO); 2017. [cited 2017 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www​.who.int/diagnostic_imaging​/imaging_modalities​/dim_magresimaging/en/
47.
Consiglio N. MRI and patient safety. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2006;37(2):5–9.
48.
Shellock FG. MRIsafety.com [Internet]. [Playa Del Ray (CA)]: Shellock R & D Services, Inc.; 2017. [cited 2017 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www​.mrisafety.com/SafetyInfog.asp
49.
Shellock FG, Crues JV, Karacozoff AM. MRI bioeffects, safety, and patient management. Los Angeles (CA): Biomedical Research Publishing Group; [2014].
50.
Nuclear medicine [Internet]. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization (WHO); 2017. [cited 2017 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www​.who.int/diagnostic_imaging​/imaging_modalities​/dim_nuclearmed/en/
51.
Wongwaisayawan S, Suwannanon R, Sawatmongkorngul S, Kaewlai R. Emergency Thoracic US: The Essentials. Radiographics. 2016 May;36(3):640–59. [PubMed: 27035835]
52.
Hunsaker AR, Lu MT, Goldhaber SZ, Rybicki FJ. Imaging in acute pulmonary embolism with special clinical scenarios. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jul;3(4):491–500. [PubMed: 20647583]
53.
Mos I, Klok F, Kroft L, de Roos A, Huisman M. Imaging tests in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;33:138–43. [PubMed: 22648485]
54.
Schiebler ML, Nagle SK, Francois CJ, Repplinger MD, Hamedani AG, Vigen KK, et al Effectiveness of MR angiography for the primary diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes at 3 months and 1 year. J Magn Reson Imaging [Internet]. 2013 Oct [cited 2016 Oct 7];38(4):914–25. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3970266 [PMC free article: PMC3970266] [PubMed: 23553735]
55.
Le Roux PY, Robin P, Delluc A, Abgral R, Duc-Pennec AL, Nowak E, et al V/Q SPECT interpretation for pulmonary embolism diagnosis: Which criteria to use? J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 Oct 7];54(7):1077–81. Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/54/7/1077.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 23637200]
56.
Sheh S, Bellin E, Freeman K, Haramati L. Pulmonary embolism diagnosis and mortality with pulmonary CT angiography versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: evidence of overdiagnosis with CT? AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Nov 17];198:1340–5. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.11.6426 [PubMed: 22623546] [CrossRef]
57.
Anderson DR, Kahn SR, Rodger MA, Kovacs MJ, Morris T, Hirsch A, et al Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Dec 19;298(23):2743–53. [PubMed: 18165667]
58.
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med [Internet]. 2009 Dec 14 [cited 2016 Jul 27];169(22):2078–86. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635397 [PMC free article: PMC4635397] [PubMed: 20008690]
59.
Phillips JJ, Straiton J, Staff RT. Planar and SPECT ventilation/perfusion imaging and computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, and cost and dose comparison. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jul;84(7):1392–400. [PubMed: 25868674]
60.
Robert-Ebadi H, Le Gal G, Righini M. Evolving imaging techniques in diagnostic strategies of pulmonary embolism. Exp Rev Cardiovasc Therapy. 2016;14(4):495–503. [PubMed: 26691634]
61.
Morgan DJ, Dhruva SS, Coon ER, Wright SM, Korenstein D. 2017 Update on Medical Overuse: A Systematic Review. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):110–115. [PMC free article: PMC7493453] [PubMed: 28973402]
62.
Le Gal G, Bounameaux H. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: running after the decreasing prevalence of cases among suspected patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Aug;2(8):1244–6. [PubMed: 15304024]
63.
Schissler AJ, Rozenshtein A, Kulon ME, Pearson GD, Green RA, Stetson PD, et al CT pulmonary angiography: increasingly diagnosing less severe pulmonary emboli. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 Nov 17];8(6):e65669. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3680477 [PMC free article: PMC3680477] [PubMed: 23776522]
64.
Walen S, Leijstra MA, Uil SM, Boomsma MF, van den Berg JW. Diagnostic yield of CT thorax angiography in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism: independent predictors and protocol adherence. Insights Imaging [Internet]. 2014 Apr [cited 2016 Oct 12];5(2):231–6. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999363 [PMC free article: PMC3999363] [PubMed: 24696191]
65.
Mamlouk MD, vanSonnenberg E, Gosalia R, Drachman D, Gridley D, Zamora JG, et al Pulmonary embolism at CT angiography: implications for appropriateness, cost, and radiation exposure in 2003 patients. Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):625–32. [PubMed: 20551182]
66.
Shankar S, Gour A, Khanijao S, Taha O, Kitchloo K, Gorukanti P, et al The diagnostic yield of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for pulmonary diseases [abstract]. Chest [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 30];149(4 Suppl):A521. Available from: http://journal​.publications​.chestnet.org/article​.aspx?articleid=2511929
67.
Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Hull RD, et al Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 1;354(22):2317–27. [PubMed: 16738268]
68.
Miller WT, Marinari LA, Mahne A. Frequency and causes of false-positive CTPA exams in community hospitals [abstract]. Chest [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2016 Aug 30];136(4 Suppl):14S. Available from: http://journal​.publications​.chestnet.org/article​.aspx?articleid=1095863
69.
Hutchinson B, Navin P, Marom E, Truong M, Bruzzi J. Overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism by pulmonary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2015;205:271–7. [PubMed: 26204274]
70.
Hogg K, Brown G, Dunning J, Wright J, Carley S, Foex B, et al Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with CT pulmonary angiography: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2006 Mar [cited 2016 Oct 13];23(3):172–8. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2464412 [PMC free article: PMC2464412] [PubMed: 16498151]
71.
Lucassen WA, Beenen LF, Buller HR, Erkens PM, Schaefer-Prokop CM, van den Berk I, et al Concerns in using multi-detector computed tomography for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in daily practice. A cross-sectional analysis using expert opinion as reference standard. Thromb Res [Internet]. 2013 Feb [cited 2016 Oct 7];131(2):145–9. Available from: http://www​.sciencedirect​.com/science/article​/pii/S0049384812008481 [PubMed: 23245652]
72.
Stein PD, Goodman LR, Hull RD, Dalen JE, Matta F. Diagnosis and management of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism: review and assessment of the options. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2012 Jan;18(1):20–6. [PubMed: 21949040]
73.
Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 2011 May 9;171(9):831–7. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140219 [PMC free article: PMC3140219] [PubMed: 21555660]
74.
Glassroth J. Imaging of pulmonary embolism: too much of a good thing? JAMA. 2007 Dec 19;298(23):2788–9. [PubMed: 18165674]
75.
Burge AJ, Freeman KD, Klapper PJ, Haramati LB. Increased diagnosis of pulmonary embolism without a corresponding decline in mortality during the CT era. Clin Radiol. 2008 Apr;63(4):381–6. [PubMed: 18325357]
76.
Wilbur J, Shian B. Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Am Fam Physician [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Jul 19];86(10):913–9. Available from: http://www​.aafp.org/afp/2012/1115/p913​.pdf [PubMed: 23157144]
77.
Stein P, Sostman D, Dalen J, Bailey D, Bajc M, Goldhaber S, et al Controversies in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011;17(2):140–9. [PubMed: 21159701]
78.
Tapson VF. Overview of the treatment, prognosis, and follow-up of acute pulmonary embolism in adults. In: Post TW, editor. UpToDate [Internet]. Waltham (MA): UpToDate; 2016 Jul 19 [cited 2016 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www​.uptodate.com​/contents/overview-of-the-treatment-prognosis-and-follow-up-of-acute-pulmonary-embolism-in-adults
79.
PRESS peer review electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline explanation and elaboration (PRESS E&E) [Internet]. Ottawa: CADTH; 2016 Jan. [cited 2016 Sep 13]. (CADTH methods and guidelines). Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/sites/default/files​/pdf/CP0015_PRESS_Update_Report_2016.pdf
80.
Zhou M, Hu Y, Long X, Liu D, Liu L, Dong C, et al Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Sep;13(9):1623–34. [PubMed: 26179627]
81.
Squizzato A, Pomero F, Allione A, Priotto R, Riva N, Huisman MV, et al Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a bivariate meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2017 Apr 7;154:64–72. [PubMed: 28427005]
82.
Squizzato A, Rancan E, Dentali F, Bonzini M, Guasti L, Steidl L, et al Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jul;11(7):1269–78. [PubMed: 23574640]
83.
Whiting P, Savovic J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, et al ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2016 Jan [cited 2016 Jul 27];69:225–34. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687950 [PMC free article: PMC4687950] [PubMed: 26092286]
84.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529–36. [PubMed: 22007046]
85.
Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Internet]. Version 5.1.0. London (England): The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 Mar. 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. [cited 2016 Jul 27]. Available from: http://handbook​.cochrane​.org/chapter_8/8​_assessing_risk_of_bias​_in_included_studies.htm
86.
Sterne JAC, Higgins JPT, Reeves BC, on behalf of the development group. The ROBINS-I tool (Risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of Interventions) [Internet]. [Oxford, United Kingdom]: The Cochrane Collaboration. 2016 Mar [cited 2016 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www​.riskofbias.info
87.
Moga C, Guo B, Schopflocher D, Harstall C. Development of a quality appraisal tool for case series studies using a modified Delphi technique [Internet]. Edmonton (AB): Institute of Health Economics; 2012 Mar 7. [cited 2017 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www​.ihe.ca/publications​/development-of-a-quality-appraisal-tool-for-case-series-studies-using-a-modified-delphi-technique
88.
Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001 Oct 15;20(19):2865–84. [PubMed: 11568945]
89.
Dendukuri N, Schiller I, Joseph L, Pai M. Bayesian meta-analysis of the accuracy of a test for tuberculous pleuritis in the absence of a gold standard reference. Biometrics [Internet]. 2012 Dec [cited 2016 Jul 27];68(4):1285–93. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728030 [PMC free article: PMC3728030] [PubMed: 22568612]
90.
Sinclair A, Xie X, Teltscher M, Dendukuri N. Systematic review and meta-analysis of a urine-based pneumococcal antigen test for diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol [Internet]. 2013 Jul [cited 2016 Jul 27];51(7):2303–10. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697702 [PMC free article: PMC3697702] [PubMed: 23678060]
91.
Novielli N, Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of two diagnostic tests used in combination: application to the ddimer test and the wells score for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):619–28. [PubMed: 23796297]
92.
Novielli N, Cooper NJ, Sutton AJ. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests in combination: is it important to allow for performance dependency? Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):536–41. [PubMed: 23796287]
93.
Wang Z, Dendukuri N, Joseph L. Understanding the effects of conditional dependence in research studies involving imperfect diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 2017 Feb 10;36(3):466–80. [PubMed: 27730659]
94.
Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Douketis J, Turpie AG, Bates SM, Lee AY, et al An evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jun 6;144(11):812–21. [PubMed: 16754923]
95.
Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks J, Harbord R, Takwoingi Y. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy [Internet]. Version 10. London: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2010. Chapter 10. Analysing and presenting results. [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: http://methods​.cochrane​.org/sdt/sites/methods​.cochrane.org.sdt​/files/uploads/Chapter​%2010%20-%20Version%201.0.pdf
96.
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J R Statist Soc B. 2002;64(Part 4):583–639.
97.
The R project for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation; 2016. [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: https://www​.r-project.org/
98.
Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing. 2000 Oct;10(4):325–37.
99.
Doebler P. Mada: meta-analysis of diganostic accuracy [Internet]. Version 0.5.7. [place uknown]: Comprehensive R Archive Network; 2015. [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: https://cran​.r-project​.org/web/packages/mada/index.html
100.
Optimal strategies for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a health technology assessment - project protocol [Internet]. Ottawa: CADTH; 2016 Sep 29. [cited 2017 Jun 28]. (CADTH optimal use report vol. 6, no. 3a). Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/optimal-strategies-diagnosis-acute-pulmonary-embolism-health-technology-assessment-project-protocol [PubMed: 27831677]
101.
Higgins JP. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Internet]. Version 5.1.0. London (England): The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 [cited 2016 Aug 9]. Available from: http://handbook​.cochrane.org/
102.
Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2016 Aug 8];36(3). Available from: https://www​.jstatsoft​.org/article/view/v036i03
103.
Siccama RN, Janssen KJ, Verheijden NA, Oudega R, Bax L, van Delden JJ, et al Systematic review: diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules for venous thromboembolism in elderly. Ageing Res Rev. 2011 Apr;10(2):304–13. [PubMed: 21130902]
104.
van Es N, van der Hulle T, van Es J, den Exter PL, Douma RA, Goekoop RJ, et al Wells Rule and d-Dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Aug 16;165(4):253–61. [PubMed: 27182696]
105.
Sanders S, Doust J, Glasziou P. A systematic review of studies comparing diagnostic clinical prediction rules with clinical judgment. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2015;10(6):e0128233. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454557 [PMC free article: PMC4454557] [PubMed: 26039538]
106.
Pernod G, Maignan M, Marlu R. Questioning the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold to exclude venous thromboembolism: analysis of individual patient data from two diagnostic studies: comment. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(12):2553–4. [PubMed: 27537421]
107.
Bosson JL, Pernod G, Joubin E, Hamidfar R, Bricault I, Hugon V, et al Non-conform diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism suspected patients is responsible for a higher risk of thrombotic event occurrence. J Mal Vasc. 2007;32(1):15–22. [PubMed: 17321710]
108.
Galipienzo J, Garcia de Tena J, Flores J, Alvarez C, Garcia-Avello A, Arribas I. Effectiveness of a diagnostic algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in an emergency department. Rom J Intern Med. 2012 Jul;50(3):195–202. [PubMed: 23330286]
109.
Ghanima W, Almaas V, Aballi S, Dorje C, Nielssen BE, Holmen LO, et al Management of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) by D-dimer and multi-slice computed tomography in outpatients: an outcome study. J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Sep;3(9):1926–32. [PubMed: 16102097]
110.
Hogg K, Dawson D, kway-Jones K. Outpatient diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: the MIOPED (Manchester Investigation Of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis) study. Emerg Med J [Internet]. 2006 Feb [cited 2016 Oct 13];23(2):123–7. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2564034 [PMC free article: PMC2564034] [PubMed: 16439741]
111.
Jouveshomme S, Bohn I, Cazaban A. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalised patients: retrospective survey of an institutional standard. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 2007 Dec [cited 2016 Oct 6];30(6):1117–23. Available from: http://erj​.ersjournals​.com/content/erj/30/6/1117.full.pdf [PubMed: 17715169]
112.
Miniati M, Monti S, Bauleo C, Scoscia E, Tonelli L, Dainelli A, et al A diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism based on standardised pretest probability and perfusion lung scanning: a management study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Nov;30(11):1450–6. [PubMed: 14579082]
113.
Miron MJ, Perrier A, Bounameaux H, de Moerloose P, Slosman DO, Didier D, et al Contribution of noninvasive evaluation to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 1999 Jun [cited 2016 Dec 6];13(6):1365–70. Available from: http://erj​.ersjournals​.com/content/erj/13/6/1365.full.pdf [PubMed: 10445613]
114.
Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Le Gal G, Meyer G, Gourdier AL, et al Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2005 Apr 28;352(17):1760–8. Available from: 10.1056/NEJMoa042905 [PubMed: 15858185] [CrossRef]
115.
Vigo M, Pesavento R, Bova C, Porro F, Ghirarduzzi A, Bazzan M, et al The value of four-detector row spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006 Nov;32(8):831–7. [PubMed: 17171597]
116.
Righini M, Le Gal G, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Verschuren F, et al Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2008 Apr 19;371(9621):1343–52. [PubMed: 18424324]
117.
Lechleitner P, Riedl B, Raneburger W, Gamper G, Theurl A, Lederer A. Chest sonography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison with MRI angiography and ventilation perfusion scintigraphy. Ultraschall Med. 2002 Dec;23(6):373–8. [PubMed: 12514752]
118.
Galipienzo J, Garcia de Tena J, Flores J, Álvarez C, Alonso-Viteri S, Ruiz A. Safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism with a negative multislice computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Eur J Intern Med. 2010 Aug;21(4):283–8. [PubMed: 20603036]
119.
Lu GM, Luo S, Meinel FG, McQuiston AD, Zhou CS, Kong X, et al High-pitch computed tomography pulmonary angiography with iterative reconstruction at 80 kVp and 20 mL contrast agent volume. Eur Radiol. 2014 Dec;24(12):3260–8. [PubMed: 25100336]
120.
Thieme SF, Graute V, Nikolaou K, Maxien D, Reiser MF, Hacker M, et al Dual Energy CT lung perfusion imaging - correlation with SPECT/CT. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(2):360–5. [PubMed: 21185141]
121.
Wang F, Fang W, Lv B, Lu JG, Xiong CM, Ni XH, et al Comparison of lung scintigraphy with multi-slice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Nucl Med. 2009 Jul;34(7):424–7. [PubMed: 19542945]
122.
Reinartz P, Wildberger JE, Schaefer W, Nowak B, Mahnken AH, Buell U. Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multislice spiral CT. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2004 Sep [cited 2016 Dec 1];45(9):1501–8. Available from: http://iv​.iiarjournals​.org/content/19/5/873.long [PubMed: 15347717]
123.
Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS, Tarver RD, Williams MD, Shah H, et al Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology [Internet]. 2004 Dec [cited 2016 Dec 1];233(3):806–15. Available from: 10.1148/radiol.2333031744 [PubMed: 15564410] [CrossRef]
124.
Nilsson T, Soderberg M, Lundqvist G, Cederlund K, Larsen F, Rasmussen E, et al A comparison of spiral computed tomography and latex agglutination D-dimer assay in acute pulmonary embolism using pulmonary arteriography as gold standard. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2002 Dec;36(6):373–7. [PubMed: 12626206]
125.
Qanadli SD, Hajjam ME, Mesurolle B, Barre O, Bruckert F, Joseph T, et al Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. Radiology [Internet]. 2000 Nov [cited 2016 Dec 1];217(2):447–55. Available from: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv01447 [PubMed: 11058644] [CrossRef]
126.
Coche E, Verschuren F, Keyeux A, Goffette P, Goncette L, Hainaut P, et al Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology [Internet]. 2003 Dec [cited 2016 Dec 1];229(3):757–65. Available from: 10.1148/radiol.2293020889 [PubMed: 14657313] [CrossRef]
127.
Mahdavi R, Caronia J, Fayyaz J, Panagopoulos G, Lessnau KD, Scharf SC, et al Agreement between SPECT V/Q scan and CT angiography in patients with high clinical suspicion of PE. Ann Nucl Med. 2013 Nov;27(9):834–8. [PubMed: 23934218]
128.
Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV, Johnbeck CB, von der RP, Petersen CL, et al Detection of pulmonary embolism with combined ventilation-perfusion SPECT and low-dose CT: head-to-head comparison with multidetector CT angiography. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2009 Dec [cited 2016 Oct 12];50(12):1987–92. Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/50/12/1987.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 19910421]
129.
Okada M, Kunihiro Y, Nakashima Y, Nomura T, Kudomi S, Yonezawa T, et al Added value of lung perfused blood volume images using dual-energy CT for assessment of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jan;84(1):172–7. [PubMed: 25445893]
130.
Megyeri B, Christe A, Schindera ST, Horkay E, Sikula J, Cullmann JL, et al Accuracy of computed tomography angiography in the detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with high body weight. Eur J Intern Med. 2014 Oct;25(8):724–30. [PubMed: 25179677]
131.
He J, Wang F, Dai HJ, Li M, Wang Q, Yao Z, et al Chinese multi-center study of lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Oct;28(7):1799–805. [PubMed: 22228471]
132.
Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, Valli N, Couffinhal T, Raherisson C, et al Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2000 Apr [cited 2017 Jan 16];174(4):1041–7. Available from: 10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741041 [PubMed: 10749247] [CrossRef]
133.
Stein PD, Beemath A, Quinn DA, Olson RE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, et al Usefulness of multidetector spiral computed tomography according to age and gender for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 1;99(9):1303–5. [PubMed: 17478162]
134.
Gupta A, Raja AS, Khorasani R. Examining clinical decision support integrity: is clinician self-reported data entry accurate? J Am Med Inform Assoc [Internet]. 2014 Jan [cited 2016 Oct 4];21(1):23–6. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3912709 [PMC free article: PMC3912709] [PubMed: 23886922]
135.
Li H, Cheng Y, Liu B, Lv Y, Guo Y, Wang G, et al Diagnostic value of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR pulmonary angiography with liver acquisition volume acceleration sequence on a 3-T MR system for acute pulmonary embolism. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Feb 16];10(1):872–80. Available from: http://www​.ijcem.com/files/ijcem0038614​.pdf
136.
Pasin L, Zanon M, Moreira J, Moreira AL, Watte G, Marchiori E, et al Magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced MR and influence in mortality rates. Lung. 2017 Apr;195(2):193–199. [PubMed: 28116500]
137.
Nyrén S, Nordgren Rogberg A, Vargas Paris R, Bengtsson B, Westerlund E, Lindholm P. Detection of pulmonary embolism using repeated MRI acquisitions without respiratory gating: a preliminary study. Acta Radiol. 2017 Mar;58(3):272–278. [PubMed: 27273375]
138.
Zhang LJ, Luo S, Yeh BM, Zhou CS, Tang CX, Zhao Y, et al Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3-T for acute pulmonary embolism detection: comparison with multidetector CT angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 12;168(5):4775–83. [PubMed: 23958419]
139.
Revel MP, Sanchez O, Lefort C, Meyer G, Couchon S, Hernigou A, et al Diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced, contrast-enhanced perfusion and angiographic MRI sequences for pulmonary embolism diagnosis: results of independent sequence readings. Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2374–82. [PubMed: 23652845]
140.
Revel MP, Sanchez O, Couchon S, Planquette B, Hernigou A, Niarra R, et al Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonary embolism: results of the ‘IRM-EP’ study. J Thromb Haemost [Internet]. 2012 May [cited 2017 Feb 8];10(5):743–50. Available from: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04652.x/epdf [PubMed: 22321816] [CrossRef]
141.
Kluge A, Luboldt W, Bachmann G. Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2006 Jul [cited 2016 Oct 31];187(1):W7–14. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.04.1814 [PubMed: 16794142] [CrossRef]
142.
Grist TM, Sostman HD, MacFall JR, Foo TK, Spritzer CE, Witty L, et al Pulmonary angiography with MR imaging: preliminary clinical experience. Radiology. 1993 Nov;189(2):523–30. [PubMed: 8210385]
143.
Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P, van Ooijen PM, Brouwers-Kuyper EM, Bongaerts AH, et al Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002 May 11;359(9318):1643–7. [PubMed: 12020524]
144.
Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM, Kumar AB, Davis SJ, Fallon MJ, et al Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology. 1999 Feb;210(2):353–9. [PubMed: 10207414]
145.
Meaney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, Stafford-Johnson D, Hamilton BH, Prince MR. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. Abstract presented at: 1997 May 15. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.
146.
Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, et al Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2010 Apr 6 [cited 2016 Oct 4];152(7):434–43. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3138428 [PMC free article: PMC3138428] [PubMed: 20368649]
147.
Ohno Y, Higashino T, Takenaka D, Sugimoto K, Yoshikawa T, Kawai H, et al MR angiography with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for suspected pulmonary embolism: comparison with MDCT and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2004 Jul [cited 2016 Dec 1];183(1):91–8. Available from: 10.2214/ajr.183.1.1830091 [PubMed: 15208117] [CrossRef]
148.
Erdman WA, Peshock RM, Redman HC, Bonte F, Meyerson M, Jayson HT, et al Pulmonary embolism: comparison of MR images with radionuclide and angiographic studies. Radiology. 1994 Feb;190(2):499–508. [PubMed: 8284406]
149.
Pleszewski B, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Qanadli SD, Déry R, Perreault P, Oliva VL, et al Gadolinium-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective study on 48 patients. Clin Imaging. 2006 May;30(3):166–72. [PubMed: 16632150]
150.
Abootalebi A, Golshani K, Karami M, Masoumi B, Aliasgharlou M. Diagnostic validity of ultrasonography in evaluation of pulmonary thromboembolism. Adv Biomed Res [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Oct 4];5:4. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763566 [PMC free article: PMC4763566] [PubMed: 26955625]
151.
Nazerian P, Vanni S, Volpicelli G, Gigli C, Zanobetti M, Bartolucci M, et al Accuracy of point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2014 May;145(5):950–7. [PubMed: 24092475]
152.
Comert SS, Caglayan B, Akturk U, Fidan A, Kiral N, Parmaksiz E, et al The role of thoracic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Ann Thorac Med [Internet]. 2013 Apr [cited 2016 Oct 4];8(2):99–104. Available from: http://www​.thoracicmedicine​.org/temp/AnnThoracMed8299-5029393_135813.pdf [PMC free article: PMC3667453] [PubMed: 23741272]
153.
Pfeil A, Reissig A, Heyne JP, Wolf G, Kaiser WA, Kroegel C, et al Transthoracic sonography in comparison to multislice computed tomography in detection of peripheral pulmonary embolism. Lung. 2010 Jan;188(1):43–50. [PubMed: 19936832]
154.
Reißig A, Heyne JP, Kroegel C. Ancillary lung parenchymal findings at spiral CT scanning in pulmonary embolism. Relationship to chest sonography. Eur J Radiol. 2004 Mar;49(3):250–7. [PubMed: 14962655]
155.
Mohn K, Quiot JJ, Nonent M, Lacut K, Le Gall G, Couturaud F, et al Transthoracic sonography of the lung and pleura in view of a suspected pulmonary embolism: a pilot study. J Ultrasound Med [Internet]. 2003 Jul [cited 2016 Dec 1];22(7):673–8. Available from: http://www​.jultrasoundmed​.org/content/22/7/673.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 12862265]
156.
Reissig A, Heyne JP, Kroegel C. Sonography of lung and pleura in pulmonary embolism: sonomorphologic characterization and comparison with spiral CT scanning. Chest. 2001 Dec;120(6):1977–83. [PubMed: 11742931]
157.
Mathis G, Metzler J, Fussenegger D, Sutterlutti G, Feurstein M, Fritzsche H. Sonographic observation of pulmonary infarction and early infarctions by pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 1993 Jun [cited 2016 Dec 1];14(6):804–8. [PubMed: 8325309]
158.
Lechleitner P, Raneburger W, Gamper G, Riedl B, Benedikt E, Theurl A. Lung sonographic findings in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ultraschall Med. 1998 Apr;19(2):78–82. [PubMed: 9654673]
159.
Kim PS, Gasparis AP, Probeck K, Elitharp D, Tassiopoulos A, Labropoulos N. Accuracy of venous thromboembolism assessment and compliance to prophylaxis in a tertiary care center. Phlebology. 2016;31(8):541–5. [PubMed: 26354287]
160.
Watanabe N, Fettich J, Kucuk NO, Kraft O, Mut F, Choudhury P, et al Modified PISAPED criteria in combination with ventilation scintigraphic finding for predicting acute pulmonary embolism. World J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2015 Sep [cited 2016 Oct 4];14(3):178–83. Available from: http://www​.wjnm.org/temp​/WorldJNuclMed143178-4442071_122020​.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4564920] [PubMed: 26420988]
161.
Skarlovnik A, Hrastnik D, Fettich J, Grmek M. Lung scintigraphy in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Current methods and interpretation criteria in clinical practice. Radiol Oncol [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 7];48(2):113–9. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC4078029/pdf/rado-48-02-113.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4078029] [PubMed: 24991200]
162.
Tondeur MC, Mols PG, Ham HR. Is the perfusion lung-scan still useful for the diagnosis approach towards lung embolism suspicion in the emergency department? JEUR. 2007;20(4):153–7.
163.
Lu Y, Lorenzoni A, Fox JJ, Rademaker J, Vander Els N, Grewal RK, et al Noncontrast perfusion single-photon emission CT/CT scanning: a new test for the expedited, high-accuracy diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2014 May;145(5):1079–88. [PubMed: 24798835]
164.
Sostman HD, Miniati M, Gottschalk A, Matta F, Stein PD, Pistolesi M. Sensitivity and specificity of perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography for acute pulmonary embolism in PIOPED II. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2008 Nov [cited 2016 Oct 7];49(11):1741–8. Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/49/11/1741.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 18927339]
165.
Rubini G, Niccoli AA, Stabile Ianora AA, Rubini D, Gaudiano A, Angelelli G, et al Acute pulmonary embolism: comparison and integration of perfusion lung scintigraphy with multislice spiral CT. Radiol Med (Torino). 2007 Mar;112(2):174–84. [PubMed: 17361378]
166.
Mazurek A, Dziuk M, Witkowska-Patena E, Piszczek S, Gizewska A. The Utility of Hybrid SPECT/CT Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy in Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis. Respiration. 2015;90(5):393–401. [PubMed: 26418469]
167.
van Es J, Douma RA, Hezemans REL, Penaloza A, Motte S, Erkens PGM, et al Accuracy of X-ray with perfusion scan in young patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2015;136(2):221–4. [PubMed: 26026636]
168.
Miniati M, Pistolesi M, Marini C, Di Ricco G, Formichi B, Prediletto R, et al Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Nov;154(5):1387–93. [PubMed: 8912753]
169.
Collart JP, Roelants V, Vanpee D, Lacrosse M, Trigaux JP, Delaunois L, et al Is a lung perfusion scan obtained by using single photon emission computed tomography able to improve the radionuclide diagnosis of pulmonary embolism? Nucl Med Commun. 2002 Nov;23(11):1107–13. [PubMed: 12411840]
170.
Ishiyama M, Matsusako M, Oikado K, Nishi Y, Ohi K, Hirano M, et al Three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging using the dark blood method for detecting pulmonary embolisms: comparison with computed tomography angiography. Jpn J Radiol. 2011 Nov;29(9):667–72. [PubMed: 21956375]
171.
Kumamaru KK, Kumamaru H, Bateman BT, Gronsbell J, Cai T, Liu J, et al Limited hospital variation in the use and yield of CT for pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing total hip or total knee replacement surgery. Radiology. 2016 May 26;152765. [PubMed: 27228331]
172.
Casals-Sole J, Bernaudo D, Camp J, Lozano N, Ballester E, Escolar G. A normal D-Dimer value, measured by a high sensitivity assay, rule out a suspected Venous Thromboembolism episode independently of pretest clinical probability [abstract]. Haematologica. 2009;94:408–9. (Presented at 14th Congress of the European Hematology Association; 2009 Jun 4–7; Berlin, Germany).
173.
Bajc M, Miniati M, Jogi J, Stein PD. Perfusion SPECT in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2013;40(9):1432–7. [PubMed: 23653241]
174.
Le Roux PY, Robin P, Delluc A, Abgral R, Palard X, Tissot V, et al Additional value of combining low-dose computed tomography to V/Q SPECT on a hybrid SPECT-CT camera for pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Nucl Med Commun. 2015 Sep;36(9):922–30. [PubMed: 26049372]
175.
Kumar N, Xie K, Mar W, Anderson TM, Carney B, Mehta N, et al Software-based hybrid perfusion SPECT/CT provides diagnostic accuracy when other pulmonary embolism imaging is indeterminate. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Dec;49(4):303–11. [PMC free article: PMC4630324] [PubMed: 26550050]
176.
Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV, von der Recke P, Petersen CL, Kristoffersen US, et al Comparison of V/Q SPECT and planar V/Q lung scintigraphy in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism. Nucl Med Commun. 2010 Jan;31(1):82–6. [PubMed: 19918207]
177.
PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990 May 23;263(20):2753–9. [PubMed: 2332918]
178.
Gray HW, McKillop JH, Bessent RG, Fogelman I, Smith ML, Moran F. Lung scanning for pulmonary embolism: clinical and pulmonary angiographic correlations. Poster presented at: 1990 Nov. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow. [PubMed: 2274657]
179.
Woods ER, Iles S, Jackson S. Comparison of scintigraphic diagnostic criteria in suspected pulmonary embolism. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1989 Aug;40(4):194–7. [PubMed: 2670080]
180.
Sostman HD, Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Matta F, Hull R, Goodman L. Acute pulmonary embolism: sensitivity and specificity of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in PIOPED II study. Radiology [Internet]. 2008 Mar [cited 2016 Nov 16];246(3):941–6. Available from: 10.1148/radiol.2463070270 [PubMed: 18195380] [CrossRef]
181.
Stein PD, Terrin ML, Gottschalk A, Alavi A, Henry JW. Value of ventilation/perfusion scans versus perfusion scans alone in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1992 May 1;69(14):1239–41. [PubMed: 1575198]
182.
Quirce R, Ibanez-Bravo S, Jimenez-Bonilla J, Martinez-Rodriguez I, Martinez-Amador N, Ortega-Nava F, et al Contribution of V/Q SPECT to planar scintigraphy in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol [Internet]. 2014 May [cited 2016 Oct 4];33(3):153–8. Available from: http://www​.elsevier.es​/es-revista-revista-espanola-medicina-nuclear-e-125-linkresolver-contribution-v-q-spect-planar-scintigraphy-S2253654X14000067 [PubMed: 24485808]
183.
Miles S, Rogers KM, Thomas P, Soans B, Attia J, Abel C, et al A comparison of single-photon emission CT lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2009 Dec;136(6):1546–53. [PubMed: 19525358]
184.
Bajc M, Olsson B, Palmer J, Jonson B. Ventilation/Perfusion SPECT for diagnostics of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice. J Intern Med. 2008 Oct;264(4):379–87. [PubMed: 18823506]
185.
Harris B, Bailey D, Miles S, Bailey E, Rogers K, Roach P, et al Objective analysis of tomographic ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun 1;175(11):1173–80. [PubMed: 17363770]
186.
Reinartz P, Kaiser HJ, Wildberger JE, Gordji C, Nowak B, Buell U. SPECT imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: automated detection of match and mismatch defects by means of image-processing techniques. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2006 Jun [cited 2016 Oct 13];47(6):968–73. Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/47/6/968.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 16741306]
187.
Weinmann P, Moretti JL, Brauner MW. Usefulness of tomographic versus planar lung scintigraphy in suspected pulmonary embolism in a daily practice. The Open Medical Imaging Journal [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2016 Oct 21];9(2):49–55. Available from: http://benthamopen​.com​/contents/pdf/TOMIJ/TOMIJ-2-49.pdf
188.
Ibáñez-Bravo S, Banzo I, Quirce R, Martínez-Rodríguez I, Jiménez-Bonilla J, Martínez-Amador N, et al Ventilation/Perfusion SPECT lung scintigraphy and computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism. Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular. 2016;35(4):215–20. [PubMed: 26838481]
189.
Bajc M, Olsson CG, Olsson B, Palmer J, Jonson B. Diagnostic evaluation of planar and tomographic ventilation/perfusion lung images in patients with suspected pulmonary emboli. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2004 Sep;24(5):249–56. [PubMed: 15383080]
190.
Le Duc-Pennec A, Le Roux PY, Cornily JC, Jaffrelot M, Delluc A, de Saint-Martin L, et al Diagnostic accuracy of single-photon emission tomography ventilation/perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2):381–7. [PubMed: 21852295]
191.
Ling IT, Naqvi HA, Siew TK, Loh NK, Ryan GF. SPECT ventilation perfusion scanning with the addition of low-dose CT for the investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Intern Med J. 2012 Nov;42(11):1257–61. [PubMed: 23157521]
192.
Bhatia KD, Ambati C, Dhaliwal R, Paschkewitz R, Hsu E, Ho B, et al SPECT-CT/VQ versus CTPA for diagnosing pulmonary embolus and other lung pathology: Pre-existing lung disease should not be a contraindication. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016 Aug;60(4):492–7. [PubMed: 27461384]
193.
Bourriot K, Couffinhal T, Bernard V, Montaudon M, Bonnet J, Laurent F. Clinical outcome after a negative spiral CT pulmonary angiographic finding in an inpatient population from cardiology and pneumology wards. Chest. 2003 Feb;123(2):359–65. [PubMed: 12576352]
194.
Donato AA, Scheirer JJ, Atwell MS, Gramp J, Duszak R. Clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative helical computed tomographic results in whom anticoagulation was withheld. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Sep 22;163(17):2033–8. [PubMed: 14504116]
195.
Gimber LH, Travis RI, Takahashi JM, Goodman TL, Yoon HC. Computed tomography angiography in patients evaluated for acute pulmonary embolism with low serum D-dimer levels: a prospective study. Perm J [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2016 Oct 6];13(4):4–10. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2911823 [PMC free article: PMC2911823] [PubMed: 20740096]
196.
Hantous-Zannad S, Esseghaier S, Ridène I, Zidi A, Ben Romdhane K, Baccouche I, et al Acute pulmonary embolism: epidemiologic and tomodensitometric study. Tunis Med. 2010 Dec;88(12):880–4. [PubMed: 21136353]
197.
Huisman MV. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006;295(2):172–9. [PubMed: 16403929]
198.
Meier A, Higashigaito K, Martini K, Wurnig M, Seifert B, Keller D, et al Dual energy CT pulmonary angiography with 6g iodine-A propensity score-matched study. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Jan 4];11(12):e0167214. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC5132396/pdf/pone.0167214.pdf [PMC free article: PMC5132396] [PubMed: 27907049]
199.
Moores L, Kline J, Portillo AK, Resano S, Vicente A, Arrieta P, et al Multidetector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in patients with a high clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(1):114–20. [PubMed: 26559176]
200.
Ost D, Rozenshtein A, Saffran L, Snider A. The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion scans. Am J Med. 2001 Jan;110(1):16–21. [PubMed: 11152860]
201.
Pérez De Llano LA, Veres Racamonde A, Ortiz Piquer M, López Diaz MJ, Janeiro Amela M, Méndez Maroto L, et al Safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients who have clinically suspected pulmonary embolism and negative results on helical computed tomography. Respiration. 2006;73(4):514–9. [PubMed: 16195662]
202.
Pesavento R, De Conti G, Minotto I, Filippi L, Mongiat M, de Faveri D, et al The value of 64-detector row computed tomography for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2011 May;105(5):901–7. [PubMed: 21301781]
203.
Revel MP, Petrover D, Hernigou A, Lefort C, Meyer G, Frija G. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism with four-detector row helical CT: prospective evaluation of 216 outpatients and inpatients1. Radiology [Internet]. 2005 Jan [cited 2016 Dec 8];234(1):265–73. Available from: 10.1148/radiol.2341031880 [PubMed: 15618385] [CrossRef]
204.
Sodhi KS, Gulati M, Aggarwal R, Kalra N, Mittal BR, Jindal SK, et al Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography: utility in acute pulmonary embolism in providing additional information and making alternative clinical diagnosis. Indian J Med Sci. 2010 Jan;64(1):26–32. [PubMed: 22301806]
205.
Woo JK, Chiu RY, Thakur Y, Mayo JR. Risk-benefit analysis of pulmonary CT angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jun;198(6):1332–9. [PubMed: 22623545]
206.
Mitchell AM, Kline JA. Contrast nephropathy following computed tomography angiography of the chest for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jan;5(1):50–4. [PubMed: 17026644]
207.
Yazici S, Kiris T, Emre A, Ceylan US, Akyuz S, Uzun AO, et al Relation of contrast nephropathy to adverse events in pulmonary emboli patients diagnosed with contrast CT. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;34(7):1247–50. [PubMed: 27146455]
208.
Niemann T, Zbinden I, Roser HW, Bremerich J, Remy-Jardin M, Bongartz G. Computed tomography for pulmonary embolism: assessment of a 1-year cohort and estimated cancer risk associated with diagnostic irradiation. Acta Radiol. 2013 Sep;54(7):778–84. [PubMed: 23761544]
209.
Kluge A, Mueller C, Strunk J, Lange U, Bachmann G. Experience in 207 combined MRI examinations for acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2006 Jun [cited 2016 Oct 13];186(6):1686–96. Available from: 10.1148/radiol.2392050118 [PubMed: 16714660] [CrossRef]
210.
Kyrtatos PG, Navalkissoor S, Burniston M, Wagner T. Planar images reprojected from SPECT V/Q data perform similarly to traditional planar V/Q scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Nucl Med Commun. 2013 May;34(5):445–50. [PubMed: 23442545]
211.
Leblanc M, Leveillée F, Turcotte E. Prospective evaluation of the negative predictive value of V/Q SPECT using 99mTc-Technegas. Nucl Med Commun. 2007 Aug;28(8):667–72. [PubMed: 17625390]
212.
Rhee KH, Iyer RS, Cha S, Naidich DP, Rusinek H, Jacobowitz GR, et al Benefit of CT venography for the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease. Clin Imaging. 2007 Jul;31(4):253–8. [PubMed: 17599619]
213.
Shahir K, Goodman LR, Tali A, Thorsen KM, Hellman RS. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: CT pulmonary angiography versus perfusion scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):W214–W220. [PubMed: 20729418]
214.
Cahill AG, Stout MJ, Macones GA, Bhalla S. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy using computed-tomographic angiography or ventilation-perfusion. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;114(1):124–9. [PubMed: 19546768]
215.
Ridge CA, Mcdermott S, Freyne BJ, Brennan DJ, Collins CD, Skehan SJ. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: comparison of pulmonary CT angiography and lung scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Nov;193(5):1223–7. [PubMed: 19843734]
216.
Chan WS, Ray JG, Murray S, Coady GE, Coates G, Ginsberg JS. Suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: clinical presentation, results of lung scanning, and subsequent maternal and pediatric outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2002 May 27;162(10):1170–5. [PubMed: 12020189]
217.
Bajc M, Olsson B, Gottsater A, Hindorf C, Jogi J. V/P SPECT as a diagnostic tool for pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2017 Mar 6];42(8):1325–30. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480826 [PMC free article: PMC4480826] [PubMed: 25916742]
218.
Browne AM, Cronin CG, NiMhuircheartaigh J, Donagh C, Morrison JJ, Lohan DG, et al Evaluation of imaging quality of pulmonary 64-MDCT angiography in pregnancy and puerperium. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2014 Jan [cited 2017 Mar 6];202(1):60–4. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.12.9917 [PubMed: 24370129] [CrossRef]
219.
Grüning T, Mingo RE, Gosling MG, Farrell SL, Drake BE, Loader RJ, et al Diagnosing venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20160021. [PMC free article: PMC5258174] [PubMed: 27055494]
220.
Scarsbrook AF, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV. Perfusion scintigraphy: diagnostic utility in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolic disease. Eur Radiol. 2007 Oct;17(10):2554–60. [PubMed: 17342484]
221.
Bourjeily G, Khalil H, Raker C, Martin S, Auger P, Chalhoub M, et al Outcomes of negative multidetector computed tomography with pulmonary angiography in pregnant women suspected of pulmonary embolism. Lung. 2012 Feb;190(1):105–11. [PubMed: 22006654]
222.
van Mens TE, Scheres LJ, de Jong PG, Leeflang MM, Nijkeuter M, Middeldorp S. Imaging for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 26;1:CD011053. [PMC free article: PMC6464730] [PubMed: 28124411]
223.
Kalb B, Sharma P, Tigges S, Ray GL, Kitajima HD, Costello JR, et al MR imaging of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR pulmonary angiography, contrast-enhanced low-flip angle 3D GRE, and nonenhanced free-induction FISP sequences. Radiology [Internet]. 2012 Apr [cited 2016 Oct 4];263(1):271–8. Available from: 10.1148/radiol.12110224 [PubMed: 22438448] [CrossRef]
224.
Mila M, Bechini J, Vazquez A, Vallejos V, Tenesa M, Espinal A, et al Acute pulmonary embolism detection with ventilation/perfusion SPECT combined with full dose CT: What is the best option? Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular. 2017;36(3):139–45. [PubMed: 28185782]
225.
van der HT, van EN, den EP, van EJ, Mos ICM, Douma RA, et al Is a normal computed tomography pulmonary angiography safe to rule out acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a likely clinical probability? A patient-level meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun 1;117(8). [PubMed: 28569924]
226.
Pelletier-Galarneau M, Zannier E, Zuckier LS, Le GG. Referral Patterns and Diagnostic Yield of Lung Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Thrombosis [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC5405392/pdf/THROMBOSIS2017-1623868​.pdf [PMC free article: PMC5405392] [PubMed: 28491475]
227.
Raymakers AJ, Mayo J, Marra CA, FitzGerald M. Diagnostic strategies incorporating computed tomography angiography for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses. J Thorac Imaging. 2014 Jul;29(4):209–16. [PubMed: 23846107]
228.
Gospodarevskaya E, V, Goergen SK, Harris AH, Chan T, de Campo JF, Wolfe R, et al Economic evaluation of a clinical protocol for diagnosing emergency patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation [Internet]. 2006 Jun 27 [cited 2016 Jul 14];4(12). Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC1550258/pdf/1478-7547-4-12.pdf [PMC free article: PMC1550258] [PubMed: 16803623]
229.
Hull RD, Pineo GF, Stein PD, Mah AF, Butcher MS. Cost-effectiveness of currently accepted strategies for pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2001;27(1):15–23. [PubMed: 11288943]
230.
Duriseti RS, Shachter RD, Brandeau ML. Value of quantitative D-dimer assays in identifying pulmonary embolism: implications from a sequential decision model. Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2016 Nov 17];13(7):755–66. Available from: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.02.011/abstract [PubMed: 16723725] [CrossRef]
231.
Duriseti RS, Brandeau ML. Cost-effectiveness of strategies for diagnosing pulmonary embolism among emergency department patients presenting with undifferentiated symptoms. Ann Emerg Med [Internet]. 2010 Oct [cited 2016 Oct 5];56(4):321–32. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3699695 [PMC free article: PMC3699695] [PubMed: 20605261]
232.
van Erkel AR, Pattynama PM. Cost-effective diagnostic algorithms in pulmonary embolism: an updated analysis. Acad Radiol. 1998 Sep;5: Suppl 2:S321–S327. [PubMed: 9750844]
233.
van Erkel AR, van Rossum AB, Bloem JL, Kievit J, Pattynama PM. Spiral CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology. 1996 Oct;201(1):29–36. [PubMed: 8816516]
234.
Stein PD, Matta E. Noninvasive imaging in pulmonary embolism according to age and gender. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2014;20(2):143–6. [PubMed: 23091281]
235.
Fertility: overview, 2009 to 2011 [Internet]. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2015 Nov 30. [cited 2017 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www​.statcan.gc​.ca/pub/91-209-x/2013001​/article/11784-eng.htm
236.
Lee JA, Zierler BK, Liu CF, Chapko MK. Cost-effective diagnostic strategies in patients with a high, intermediate, or low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011;45(2):113–21. [PubMed: 20810405]
237.
Righini M, Nendaz M, Gal G, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2016 Oct 5];5(9):1869–77. Available from: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02667.x/epdf [PubMed: 17596141] [CrossRef]
238.
Paterson DI, Schwartzman K. Strategies incorporating spiral CT for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Chest. 2001 Jun;119(6):1791–800. [PubMed: 11399706]
239.
Elias A, Molinier L, Bauvin E, Elias M, Duru G, Colin C. Integrating complete lower limb venous ultrasound into diagnostic strategies for pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2004 Jan;91(1):205–7. [PubMed: 14691590]
240.
Perrier A, Nendaz MR, Sarasin FP, Howarth N, Bounameaux H. Cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism including helical computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan 1;167(1):39–44. [PubMed: 12502474]
241.
Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada [Internet]. 4th ed. Ottawa: CADTH; 2017. [cited 2017 Jun 28]. Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/guidelines-economic-evaluation-health-technologies-canada-4th-edition
242.
Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada [Internet]. Ottawa: CADTH; 2006. [cited 2016 Aug 2]. Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/media/pdf/186_EconomicGuidelines_e.pdf
243.
Huisman MV, Klok FA. Diagnostic management of clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost [Internet]. 2009 Jul [cited 2017 Jun 28];7 Suppl 1:312–7. Available from: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03386.x/pdf [PubMed: 19630824] [CrossRef]
244.
Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis and management [Internet]. Hamilton (ON): Thrombosis Canada; 2013. [cited 2017 Jun 28]. Available from: http:​//thrombosiscanada​.ca/guides/pdfs/PE.pdf
245.
Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolic events: economic evaluation [Internet]. Ottawa: CADTH; 2016 Mar. [cited 2016 Aug 2]. (CADTH Technology review; no. 3). Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/sites/default/files​/pdf/TR0005_DOACS_for_DVT_and_PE_Report​.pdf [PubMed: 27099896]
246.
Kabrhel C, McAfee AT, Goldhaber SZ. The contribution of the subjective component of the Canadian Pulmonary Embolism Score to the overall score in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2005 Oct [cited 2017 Jun 1];12(10):915–20. Available from: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.030/abstract [PubMed: 16204134] [CrossRef]
247.
Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Gourdier AL, Cornuz J, et al Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2002 Sep;113(4):269–75. [PubMed: 12361811]
248.
Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, et al VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies. Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886–92. [PubMed: 19404542]
249.
Singh B, Mommer SK, Erwin PJ, Mascarenhas SS, Parsaik AK. Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) in pulmonary embolism--revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Med J [Internet]. 2013 Sep [cited 2016 Nov 17];30(9):701–6. Available from: http://emj​.bmj.com/content/30/9/701​.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 23038695]
250.
Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL. U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations. Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):120–33. [PubMed: 28221093]
251.
Jones JG, Mills CN, Mogensen MA, Lee CI. Radiation dose from medical imaging: a primer for emergency physicians. West J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2012 May [cited 2017 Jul 26];13(2):202–10. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415811 [PMC free article: PMC3415811] [PubMed: 22900113]
252.
Janbabanezhad TA, Shabestani-Monfared A, Deevband MR, Abdi R, Nabahati M. Dose Assessment in Computed Tomography Examination and Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Mazandaran, Iran. J Biomed Phys Eng [Internet]. 2015 Dec [cited 2017 Aug 25];5(4):177–84. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681462 [PMC free article: PMC4681462] [PubMed: 26688796]
253.
Leung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R, Lockwood CJ, Boiselle PM, Hurwitz LM, et al An official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline: evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2011 Nov 15 [cited 2017 Aug 25];184(10):1200–8. Available from: 10.1164/rccm.201108-1575ST [PubMed: 22086989] [CrossRef]
254.
Life tables, Canada, provinces and territories 2009 to 2011 [Internet]. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2015. [cited 2017 Jun 28]. Available from: http://www​.statcan.gc​.ca/pub/84-537-x/84-537-x2013005-eng​.htm
255.
Quinlan DJ, McQuillan A, Eikelboom JW. Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin for treatment of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Feb 3;140(3):175–83. [PubMed: 14757615]
256.
Agnelli G, Prandoni P, Becattini C, Silingardi M, Taliani MR, Miccio M, et al Extended oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jul 1;139(1):19–25. [PubMed: 12834314]
257.
BARRITT DW, JORDAN SC. Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. A controlled trial. Lancet. 1960 Jun 18;1(7138):1309–12. [PubMed: 13797091]
258.
Aujesky D, Smith KJ, Cornuz J, Roberts MS. Cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3):1601–10. [PubMed: 16162764]
259.
Stein PD, Matta F, Alrifai A, Rahman A. Trends in case fatality rate in pulmonary embolism according to stability and treatment. Thromb Res. 2012 Dec;130(6):841–6. [PubMed: 22909825]
260.
Wells GA, Kelly S, Elliott J, Carrier M, Hsieh S, Chen L. Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolic events: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [Internet]. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Heart Institute; 2016. [cited 2017 Jun 28]. Available from: https://www​.ottawaheart​.ca/sites/default​/files/uploads/documents​/Researchers/gwells-doac-vte-scientific-report-2015-2016.pdf
261.
Roman A, Barbera JA, Castillo MJ, Munoz R, Escribano P. Health-related quality of life in a national cohort of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Arch Bronconeumol. 2013 May;49(5):181–8. [PubMed: 23452896]
262.
Johnson JA, Pickard AS. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta, Canada. Med Care. 2000 Jan;38(1):115–21. [PubMed: 10630726]
263.
Hogg K, Kimpton M, Carrier M, Coyle D, Forgie M, Wells P. Estimating quality of life in acute venous thrombosis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 24;173(12):1067–72. [PubMed: 23689427]
264.
Rivero-Arias O, Ouellet M, Gray A, Wolstenholme J, Rothwell PM, Luengo-Fernandez R. Mapping the modified Rankin scale (mRS) measurement into the generic EuroQol (EQ-5D) health outcome. Med Decis Making. 2010 May;30(3):341–54. [PubMed: 19858500]
265.
Consumer price index, health and personal care, by province (Canada) [Internet]. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2017. [cited 2017 Jun 28]. Available from: http://www​.statcan.gc​.ca/tables-tableaux​/sum-som/l01/cst01/econ161a-eng.htm
266.
Exchange rates [Internet]. Ottawa: Bank of Canada; 2017. [cited 2017 Jun 28]. Available from: http://www​.bankofcanada​.ca/rates/exchange/?page_moved=1
267.
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care OCCI costing analysis tool. In: Health data branch web portal [Internet]. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2015 [cited 2017 Jun 28]. Available from: https://hsim​.health.gov.on.ca/hdbportal/ Registration required.
268.
Wilbur K, Lynd LD, Sadatsafavi M. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in medicine patients--a pharmacoeconomic analysis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011 Oct;17(5):454–65. [PubMed: 20699258]
269.
Schedule of benefits: physician services under the Health Insurance Act (December 22, 2015 (effectiveMar 1, 2016)) [Internet]. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2015. [cited 2017 Jun 28]. Available from: http://www​.health.gov​.on.ca/en/pro/programs​/ohip/sob/physserv​/sob_master20160401.pdf
270.
Ontario drug benefit formulary/comparative drug index. effective from May 31, 2017 [Internet]. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 28].
271.
Wu O, Robertson L, Twaddle S, Lowe GD, Clark P, Greaves M, et al Screening for thrombophilia in high-risk situations: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) study. Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(11):1–110. [PubMed: 16595080]
272.
Pengo V, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Marchiori A, Davidson BL, Tiozzo F, et al Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 27;350(22):2257–64. [PubMed: 15163775]
273.
Lobo JL, Zorrilla V, Aizpuru F, Uresandi F, Garcia-Bragado F, Conget F, et al Clinical syndromes and clinical outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism: findings from the RIETE registry. Chest. 2006 Dec;130(6):1817–22. [PubMed: 17167002]
274.
van Erkel AR, Pattynama PM. Cost-effective diagnostic algorithms in pulmonary embolism: an updated analysis. Acad Radiol. 1998 Sep;5: Suppl 2: S321–S327. [PubMed: 9750844]
275.
Wilts IT, Le GG, den Exter PL, van EJ, Carrier M, Planquette B, et al Performance of the age-adjusted cut-off for D-dimer in patients with cancer and suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2017;152:49–51. [PubMed: 28226257]
276.
Righini M, Le GG, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. More on: clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost [Internet]. 2005 Jan [cited 2017 Jun 1];3(1):188–9. Available from: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.01097.x/epdf [PubMed: 15634291] [CrossRef]
277.
Hendriksen JM, Lucassen WA, Erkens PM, Stoffers HE, van Weert HC, Buller HR, et al Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of “Gestalt” and the Wells Rule. Ann Fam Med [Internet]. 2016 May [cited 2017 Jun 28];14(3):227–34. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868561 [PMC free article: PMC4868561] [PubMed: 27184993]
278.
Di MS, Cilia C, Campagna A, D’Arrigo G, Abd ES, Tripepi G, et al Comparison of Wells and Revised Geneva Rule to Assess Pretest Probability of Pulmonary Embolism in High-Risk Hospitalized Elderly Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun;63(6):1091–7. [PubMed: 26032745]
279.
Klok FA, Kruisman E, Spaan J, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Aujesky D, et al Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jan;6(1):40–4. [PubMed: 17973649]
280.
Meyer G, Planquette B, Sanchez O. Long-term outcome of pulmonary embolism. Curr Opin Hematol. 2008 Sep;15(5):499–503. [PubMed: 18695374]
281.
Carrier M, Wells PS, Rodger MA. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside with low pre-test probability and D-dimer: safety and clinical utility of 4 methods to assign pre-test probability. Thromb Res. 2006;117(4):469–74. [PubMed: 15893807]
282.
Stein PD, Huang H, Afzal A, Noor HA. Incidence of acute pulmonary embolism in a general hospital: relation to age, sex, and race. Chest. 1999 Oct;116(4):909–13. [PubMed: 10531152]
283.
CASP qualitative research checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. Oxford (United Kingdom): Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP); 2017 Mar 13. [cited 2017 Nov 7]. Available from: http://docs​.wixstatic​.com/ugd/dded87_25658615020e427da194a325e7773d42.pdf
284.
Strand T, Tornqvist E, Rask M, Roxberg A. The experience of patients with neoplasm metastasis in the spine during a magnetic resonance imaging examination. J RADIOL NURS. 2014;33(4):191–8.
285.
Nightingale JM, Murphy FJ, Blakeley C. ‘I thought it was just an x-ray’: a qualitative investigation of patient experiences in cardiac SPECT-CT imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 2012 Mar;33(3):246–54. [PubMed: 22186908]
286.
Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M. Partner experiences of “near-miss” events in pregnancy and childbirth in the UK: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 Feb 8];9(4):e91735. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3981658 [PMC free article: PMC3981658] [PubMed: 24717799]
287.
Carlsson S, Carlsson E. ‘The situation and the uncertainty about the coming result scared me but interaction with the radiographers helped me through’: a qualitative study on patients’ experiences of magnetic resonance imaging examinations. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Nov;22(21–22):3225–34. [PubMed: 24118524]
288.
Thornton RH, Dauer LT, Shuk E, Bylund CL, Banerjee SC, Maloney E, et al Patient perspectives and preferences for communication of medical imaging risks in a cancer care setting. Radiology [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Feb 2];275(2):545–52. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC4976442/pdf/nihms804378.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4976442] [PubMed: 25803490]
289.
Munn Z, Jordan Z. The patient experience of high technology medical imaging: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Radiography. 2011;17(4):323–31. [PubMed: 27820215]
290.
Törnqvist E, Mansson A, Larsson EM, Hallstrom I. It’s like being in another world--patients’ lived experience of magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):954–61. [PubMed: 16879539]
291.
Garland S, Severn M. Approaches to diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism in Canada: current practice, challenges, and availability of testing. [Internet]. Ottawa: CADTH. Forthcoming 2017. [cited 2017 Jul 28]. Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/approaches-diagnosing-acute-pulmonary-embolism-canada-current-practice-challenges-and-availability
292.
Pfadenhauer L, Rohwer A, Burns J, Booth A, Bakke Lysdahl K, HJofmann B, et al Guidance for the assessment of context and implementation in Health Technology Assessments (HTA) and systematic reviews of complex interventions: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework [Internet]. place unknown: Integrated Health Technology Assessment for Evaluating Complex Technologies (INTEGRATE-HTA); 2016 [cited 2017 Jan 19]. Available from: http://www​.integrate-hta​.eu/wp-content/uploads​/2016/02/Guidance-for-the-Assessment-of-Context-and-Implementation-in-HTA-and-Systematic-Reviews-of-Complex-Interventions-The-Co.pdf
293.
Ahn JS, Edmonds ML, McLeod SL, Dreyer JF. Familiarity with radiation exposure dose from diagnostic imaging for acute pulmonary embolism and current patterns of practice. CJEM Can J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2014 Sep [cited 2016 Nov 30];16(5):393–404. Available from: https://www​.cambridge​.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core​/content​/view/S1481803500003079 [PubMed: 25227648]
294.
Arnason T, Wells PS, Forster AJ. Appropriateness of diagnostic strategies for evaluating suspected venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Feb;97(2):195–201. [PubMed: 17264947]
295.
Ballantine M, Bhimani M, Milne WK. Diagnostic approach to pulmonary embolism in a rural emergency department. Can j rural med [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Nov 15];17(1):17–20. Available from: http://www​.srpc.ca/PDF​/cjrm/vol17n1/pg17.pdf [PubMed: 22188622]
296.
Chen YA, Gray BG, Bandiera G, MacKinnon D, Deva DP. Variation in the utilization and positivity rates of CT pulmonary angiography among emergency physicians at a tertiary academic emergency department. Emerg Radiology. 2015 Jun;22(3):221–9. [PubMed: 25209190]
297.
Ingber S, Selby R, Lee J, Geerts W, Brnjac E. Combination pretest probability assessment and D-dimer did not reduce outpatient imaging for venous thromboembolism in a tertiary care hospital emergency department. CJEM Can J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2014 Jan [cited 2016 Dec 1];16(1):53–62. Available from: https://www​.cambridge​.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core​/content​/view/E554192410CD97381E3D0F418682EB1A​/S1481803500003328a​.pdf/combination-pretest-probability-assessment-and-d-dimer-did-not-reduce-outpatient-imaging-for-venous-thromboembolism-in-a-tertiary-care-hospital-emergency-department.pdf [PubMed: 24424001]
298.
Le Roux PY, Pelletier-Galarneau M, De Laroche R, Hofman MS, Zuckier LS, Roach P, et al Pulmonary scintigraphy for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a survey of current practices in Australia, Canada, and France. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2015 Aug [cited 2016 Dec 2];56(8):1212–7 Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/56/8/1212.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 26135110]
299.
Southern DA, Poole J, Patel A, Waters N, Pilote L, Hull RD, et al Health system capacity and infrastructure for adopting innovations to care for patients with venous thromboembolic disease. Open medicine: a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Nov 15];8(2):e46–e53. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC4085085/pdf/OpenMed-08-46.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4085085] [PubMed: 25009684]
300.
Spencer Netto F, Tien H, Ng J, Ortega S, Scarpelini S, Rizoli SB, et al Pulmonary emboli after blunt trauma: timing, clinical characteristics and natural history. Injury. 2012 Sep;43(9):1502–6. [PubMed: 21722897]
301.
Armao D, Semelka RC, Elias J. Radiology’s ethical responsibility for healthcare reform: tempering the overutilization of medical imaging and trimming down a heavyweight. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2012;35(3):512–7. [PubMed: 22180215]
302.
Gossner J, Nau R. Geriatric chest imaging: When and how to image the elderly lung, age-related changes, and common pathologies. Radiology Research and Practice [Internet]. 2013; 584793. [cited 2016 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC3713368/pdf/RRP2013-584793.pdf [PMC free article: PMC3713368] [PubMed: 23936651]
303.
Berlin L, Murphy DR, Singh H. Breakdowns in communication of radiological findings: an ethical and medico-legal conundrum. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 Dec;1(4):263–8. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799785 [PMC free article: PMC4799785] [PubMed: 27006891]
304.
Blumenthal-Barby JS, Cantor SB, Russell HV, Naik AD, Volk RJ. Decision aids: when ‘nudging’ patients to make a particular choice is more ethical than balanced, nondirective content. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):303–10. [PubMed: 23381523]
305.
Keefer R. Ethical dilemmas in radiology and the vow to do no harm. ACR Radiology [Internet]. 2012 Mar 9 [cited 2017 Aug 22]. Available from: https://www​.acr.org/News-Publications​/News​/News-Articles/2012​/ACR-Bulletin/201203-Do-No-Harm
306.
Rosenthal MS. Patient misconceptions and ethical challenges in radioactive iodine scanning and therapy. J Nucl Med Technol. 2006 Sep;34(3):143–50. [PubMed: 16951283]
307.
Adams DM, Stevens SM, Woller SC, Evans RS, Lloyd JF, Snow GL, et al Adherence to PIOPED II investigators’ recommendations for computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Am J Med. 2013 Jan;126(1):36–42. [PubMed: 23177546]
308.
Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH, Lewis RS, Jha S, Owen JB, Vializ J. Frequency of use of imaging tests in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Effects of physician specialty, patient characteristics and region. Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2016 Nov 14];194(4):1018–26. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.09.3215 [PubMed: 20308505] [CrossRef]
309.
Booker MT, Johnson JO. Optimizing CT Pulmonary Angiogram Utilization in a Community Emergency Department: A Pre- and Postintervention Study. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Jan;14(1):65–71. [PubMed: 27717576]
310.
Bozarth AL, Bajaj N, Wessling MR, Keffer D, Jallu S, Salzman GA. Evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria in a retrospective cohort at an urban academic hospital. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;33(4):483–7. [PubMed: 25745794]
311.
D’Apuzzo MR, Keller TC, Novicoff WM, Browne JA. CT pulmonary angiography after total joint arthroplasty: overdiagnosis and iatrogenic harm? Clin Orthop [Internet]. 2013 Sep [cited 2016 Nov 15];471(9):2737–42. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734436 [PMC free article: PMC3734436] [PubMed: 23661300]
312.
Daley J, Grotberg J, Pare J, Medoro A, Liu R, Hall MK, et al Emergency physician performed tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):106–111. [PubMed: 27793505]
313.
Fanikos J, Rao A, Seger AC, Carter D, Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Hospital costs of acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2013;126(2):127–32. [PubMed: 23331440]
314.
Gaston S, White S. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment: rural nurses’ knowledge and use in a rural acute care hospital. Int J Nurs Pract. 2013;19(1):60–4. [PubMed: 23432890]
315.
Goodacre S, Nelson-Piercy C, Hunt B, Chan WS. When should we use diagnostic imaging to investigate for pulmonary embolism in pregnant and postpartum women? Emerg Med J. 2015;32(1):78–82. [PubMed: 25007912]
316.
Groves AM, Yates SJ, Win T, Kayani I, Gallagher FA, Syed R, et al CT pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in pregnancy: implications from a UK survey of doctors’ knowledge of radiation exposure. Radiology [Internet]. 2006 Sep;240(3):765–70. Available from: 10.1148/radiol.2403050910 [PubMed: 16926327] [CrossRef]
317.
Johnson PT, Zimmerman SL, Heath D, Eng J, Horton KM, Scott WW, et al The iPad as a mobile device for CT display and interpretation: diagnostic accuracy for identification of pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):323–7. [PubMed: 22450843]
318.
Kline JA, Peterson CE, Steuerwald MT. Prospective evaluation of real-time use of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria in an academic emergency department. Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2010 Sep [cited 2017 Jun 1];17(9):1016–9. Available from: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00826.x/epdf [PubMed: 20836787] [CrossRef]
319.
320.
Long B, Koyfman A. Best Clinical Practice: Current Controversies in Pulmonary Embolism Imaging and Treatment of Subsegmental Thromboembolic Disease. J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;52(2):184–193. [PubMed: 27720540]
321.
Matthews S. Essay negates code of patient rights. Nurs N Z. 2006 Jun;12(5):6. [PubMed: 16845731]
322.
Mitchell AM, Kline JA. Systematic bias introduced by the informed consent process in a diagnostic research study. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;15(3):225–30. [PubMed: 18304052]
323.
Mourad M, Adler J. Safe, high quality care around the clock: What will it take to get us there? J Gen Intern Med [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2016 Nov 16];26(9):948–50. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC3157519/pdf/11606​_2011_Article_1795.pdf [PMC free article: PMC3157519] [PubMed: 21751054]
324.
Henzler T, Schoenberg SO, Schoepf UJ, Fink C. Diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness of imaging tests. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Sep;27(5):304–14. [PubMed: 22914124]
325.
Raja AS, Ip IK, Dunne RM, Schuur JD, Mills AM, Khorasani R. Effects of Performance Feedback Reports on Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines in Use of CT for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2015 Nov [cited 2016 Nov 14];205(5):936–40. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.15.14677 [PubMed: 26204114] [CrossRef]
326.
Rohacek M, Buatsi J, Szucs-Farkas Z, Kleim B, Zimmermann H, Exadaktylos A, et al Ordering CT pulmonary angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism: defense versus evidence in the emergency room. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Aug;38(8):1345–51. [PubMed: 22584801]
327.
Sheard L, Prout H, Dowding D, Noble S, Watt I, Maraveyas A, et al The ethical decisions UK doctors make regarding advanced cancer patients at the end of life-The perceived (in) appropriateness of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Nov 15];13, ArtID 22. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC3459796/pdf/1472-6939-13-22.pdf [PMC free article: PMC3459796] [PubMed: 22947200]
328.
Tirada N, Dreizin D, Khati NJ, Akin EA, Zeman RK. Imaging pregnant and lactating patients. Radiographics. 2015 Oct;35(6):1751–65. [PubMed: 26466183]
329.
Yan Z, Ip IK, Raja AS, Gupta A, Kosowsky JM, Khorasani R. Yield of CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Department When Providers Override Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support. Radiology. 2016 Sep 30;151985. [PMC free article: PMC5330300] [PubMed: 27689922]
330.
Albrecht MH, Bickford MW, Nance JW, Jr., Zhang L, De Cecco CN, Wichmann JL, et al State-of-the-Art Pulmonary CT Angiography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):495–504. [PubMed: 27897042]
331.
Alhassan S, Sayf A, Arsene C, Krayem H. Suboptimal implementation of diagnostic algorithms and overuse of computed tomography-pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Annals of Thoracic Medicine [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Feb 1];11(4):254–60. Available from: http://www​.thoracicmedicine​.org/temp/AnnThoracMed114254-4993048_135210.pdf [PMC free article: PMC5070434] [PubMed: 27803751]
332.
Mountain D, Keijzers G, Chu K, Joseph A, Read C, Blecher G, et al RESPECT-ED: Rates of Pulmonary Emboli (PE) and Sub-Segmental PE with Modern Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiograms in Emergency Departments: A Multi-Center Observational Study Finds Significant Yield Variation, Uncorrelated with Use or Small PE Rates. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Jan 31];11(12):e0166483. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5137866 [PMC free article: PMC5137866] [PubMed: 27918576]
333.
Sah S, Fagerlin A, Ubel P. Effect of physician disclosure of specialty bias on patient trust and treatment choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7465–9. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941435 [PMC free article: PMC4941435] [PubMed: 27325783]
334.
Calder KK, Herbert M, Henderson SO. The mortality of untreated pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;45(3):302–10. [PubMed: 15726055]
335.
Itri JN. Patient-centered Radiology. Radiographics. 2015 Oct;35(6):1835–46. [PubMed: 26466190]
336.
Browne AM, Cronin CG, English C, NiMhuircheartaigh J, Murphy JM, Bruzzi JF. Unsuspected pulmonary emboli in oncology patients undergoing routine computed tomography imaging. J Thorac Oncol [Internet]. 2010 Jun [cited 2016 Oct 7];5(6):798–803. Available from: http://ac​.elscdn.com​/S1556086415305062/1-s2​.0-S1556086415305062-main​.pdf?_tid=3f376638-8cc1-11e6-bef2-00000aab0f6b&acdnat​=1475867409​_ff68ac277eb054c81cab4c1450043bab [PubMed: 20421822]
337.
Matthews S. Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: What is the most appropriate imaging protocol? Br J Radiol. 2006;79(941):441–4. [PubMed: 16632627]
338.
Schuster ME, Fishman JE, Copeland JF, Hatabu H, Boiselle PM. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: a survey of practices and policies for CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Dec;181(6):1495–8. [PubMed: 14627562]
339.
Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, Romano-Miller M, Rehani MM. Radiation-associated lens opacities in catheterization personnel: results of a survey and direct assessments. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Feb;24(2):197–204. [PubMed: 23369556]
340.
Lee-Lewandrowski E, Nichols J, Van CE, Grisson R, Louissaint A, Benzer T, et al Implementation of a rapid whole blood D-dimer test in the emergency department of an urban academic medical center: impact on ED length of stay and ancillary test utilization. Am J Clin Pathol [Internet]. 2009 Sep [cited 2016 Nov 14];132(3):326–31. Available from: http://ajcp​.oxfordjournals​.org/content/ajcpath/132/3/326​.full.pdf [PubMed: 19687307]
341.
Brockbank J, Wolowacz S. Economic evaluations of new oral anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or total knee replacement [abstract]. Value in Health Conference. 2015;18(7):A392. (Presented at ISPOR 18th Annual European Congress; 2015 Nov 7–11; Milan, Italy).
342.
Canadian medical imaging inventory: 2015 [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): CADTH; 2016 Mar 31. [cited 2017 Nov 10]. (In brief a summary of the evidence). Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/sites/default/files​/pdf/cmii_in_brief_e.pdf
343.
Chenaghlou M, Parizad R, Jafarabadi MA. Risk factors and prevention of pulmonary embolism in young adults. Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences. 2017 Jan;4(1):7–12.
344.
Goldhaber SZ, Fanikos J. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2004;110:e445–7. [PubMed: 15492324]
345.
Hess S, Frary EC, Gerke O, Madsen PH. State-of-the-art Imaging in pulmonary embolism: ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography versus computed tomography angiography - controversies, results, and recommendations from a systematic review. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2016 Nov;42(8):833–845. [PubMed: 27764879]
346.
Yue K. Diagnosis efficiency for pulmonary embolism using magnetic resonance imaging method: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Nov 25];8(8):14416–23. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4613114 [PMC free article: PMC4613114] [PubMed: 26550429]
347.
Li J, Feng L, Li J, Tang J. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for acute pulmonary embolism - a systematic review and meta-analysis. VASA. 2016;45(2):149–54. [PubMed: 27058801]
348.
Kan Y, Yuan L, Meeks JK, Li C, Liu W, Yang J. The accuracy of V/Q SPECT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Acta Radiol. 2015 May;56(5):565–72. [PubMed: 24917606]
349.
Niemann T, Egelhof T, Bongartz G. Transthoracic sonography for the detection of pulmonary embolism--a meta-analysis. Ultraschall Med. 2009 Apr;30(2):150–6. [PubMed: 19253205]
350.
Jiang L, Ma Y, Zhao C, Shen W, Feng X, Xu Y, et al Role of Transthoracic Lung Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Jul 6];10(6):e0129909. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468196 [PMC free article: PMC4468196] [PubMed: 26076021]
351.
Kneeland PP, Fang MC. Current issues in patient adherence and persistence: focus on anticoagulants for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolism. Patient Prefer Adherence [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2017 Dec 11];4:51–60. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC2846139/pdf/ppa-4-051.pdf [PMC free article: PMC2846139] [PubMed: 20361065]
352.
Parilla BV, Fournogerakis R, Archer A, Sulo S, Laurent L, Lee P, et al Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful? AJP Rep [Internet]. 2016 Apr [cited 2017 Jul 17];6(2):e160–e164. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844549 [PMC free article: PMC4844549] [PubMed: 27119048]
353.
Toney LK, Kim RD, Palli SR. The economic value of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography imaging in pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1110–1123. [PMC free article: PMC5601189] [PubMed: 28650562]
354.
Onabola CO. Greening Medical Imaging in BC’s Lower Mainland Health Authorities [Internet]. Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 2017. [cited 2017 Nov 6]. Available from: https://sustain​.ubc.ca/sites/sustain​.ubc​.ca/files/Sustainability%20Scholars​/2017​_Sustainability_Scholars​/Final_Reports/Greening​%20Medical%20Imaging​%20in%20BC%20Lower​%20Mainland%20Health​%20Authorities_Onabola_%202017%20SS
355.
Addendum to optimal strategies for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a health technology assessment - project protocol. Ethics review [Internet]. Ottawa: CADTH; 2016 Oct. [cited 2016 Nov 23]. (CADTH optimal use, vol. 6, no. 3a). Available from: https://www​.cadth.ca​/addendum-optimal-strategies-diagnosis-acute-pulmonary-embolism-health-technology-assessment-project [PubMed: 27831677]
356.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2009 Jul 21 [cited 2016 Aug 8];6(7):e1000097. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2707599 [PMC free article: PMC2707599] [PubMed: 19621072]
357.
van Es N, van der Hulle T, Büller H, Klok FA, Huisman MV, Galipienzo J, et al Stand-alone D-dimer testing to rule out acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Feb;15(2):323–328. [PubMed: 27873439]
358.
Adams D, Welch JL, Kline JA. Clinical utility of an age-adjusted D-dimer in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(3):232–4. [PubMed: 24439717]
359.
Akgul O, Uyarel H. D-dimer: a novel predictive marker for cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(5):4930–1. [PubMed: 23916776]
360.
Ayaram D, Bellolio MF, Murad MH, Laack TA, Sadosty AT, Erwin PJ, et al Triple rule-out computed tomographic angiography for chest pain: a diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;20(9):861–71. [PubMed: 24050793]
361.
Barnes GD, Izzo B, Conte ML, Chopra V, Holbrook A, Fagerlin A. Use of decision aids for shared decision making in venous thromboembolism: A systematic review. Thromb Res. 2016 Jul;143:71–5. [PubMed: 27203185]
362.
Becattini C, Lignani A, Masotti L, Forte MB, Agnelli G. D-dimer for risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012 Jan;33(1):48–57. [PubMed: 22109384]
363.
Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le GG, Nendaz M, Perneger T, Bounameaux H, et al Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 May;8(5):957–70. [PubMed: 20149072]
364.
Carrier M, Righini M, Wells PS, Perrier A, Anderson DR, Rodger MA, et al Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Aug;8(8):1716–22. [PubMed: 20546118]
365.
Challen K, Goodacre SW. Predictive scoring in non-trauma emergency patients: a scoping review. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(10):827–37. [PubMed: 21212227]
366.
Crawford F, Andras A, Welch K, Sheares K, Keeling D, Chappell FM. D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;8:CD010864. [PMC free article: PMC6457638] [PubMed: 27494075]
367.
Douketis J. Review: Positive D-dimer results predict recurrence after first unprovoked VTE regardless of test timing or cutpoint, or patient age. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(2):JC1–JC5. [PubMed: 21242359]
368.
Current evidence does not support the use of a negative d-dimer to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(3):245–6. [PubMed: 21367802]
369.
Graham SM, Mwilu R, Liles WC. Clinical utility of biomarkers of endothelial activation and coagulation for prognosis in HIV infection: a systematic review. Virulence. 2013 Aug 15;4(6):564–71. [PMC free article: PMC5359730] [PubMed: 23732995]
370.
Hallifax RJ, Talwar A, Rahman NM. The role of computed tomography in assessing pleural malignancy prior to thoracoscopy. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2015 Jul;21(4):368–71. [PubMed: 26016581]
371.
Hendriksen JM, Geersing GJ, Lucassen WA, Erkens PM, Stoffers HE, van Weert HC, et al Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary care. Bmj [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Oct 14];351:h4438. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561760 [PMC free article: PMC4561760] [PubMed: 26349907]
372.
Corrigendum to prognostic clinical prediction rules to identify a low-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(1):218–20.
373.
Klok FA, Mos IC, Huisman M, V. Brain-type natriuretic peptide levels in the prediction of adverse outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(4):425–30. [PubMed: 18556626]
374.
Kohn CG, Mearns ES, Parker MW, Hernandez AV, Coleman CI. Prognostic accuracy of clinical prediction rules for early post-pulmonary embolism all-cause mortality: a bivariate meta-analysis. Chest. 2015 Apr;147(4):1043–62. [PubMed: 25317677]
375.
Manara A, D’hoore W, Thys F. Capnography as a diagnostic tool for pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;62(6):584–91. [PubMed: 23769645]
376.
Mos IC, Klok FA, Kroft LJ, DE RA, Dekkers OM, Huisman MV. Safety of ruling out acute pulmonary embolism by normal computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with an indication for computed tomography: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Sep;7(9):1491–8. [PubMed: 19552684]
377.
Mos IC, Douma RA, Erkens PM, Kruip MJ, Hovens MM, van Houten AA, et al Diagnostic outcome management study in patients with clinically suspected recurrent acute pulmonary embolism with a structured algorithm. Thromb Res. 2014 Jun;133(6):1039–44. [PubMed: 24735976]
378.
Ouatu A, Tanase DM, Ionescu SD, Rezus C, Ambarus V, Arsenescu-Georgescu C. The importance of clinical prediction models in non-fatal pulmonary embolism: an analysis of the best known clinical scores. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2014 Oct;118(4):932–41. [PubMed: 25581950]
379.
Pulivarthi S, Gurram MK. Effectiveness of D-Dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update. N A J Med Sci (Hamilt) [Internet]. 2014 Oct [cited 2016 Oct 4];6(10):491–9. Available from: http://www​.najms.org​/temp/NorthAmJMedSci610491-4195742​_113917.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4215485] [PubMed: 25489560]
380.
Rehnberg JV, Vondy A. Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 3: Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) for excluding pulmonary embolism. Emerg Med J. 2014 Jan;31(1):81–2. [PubMed: 24367015]
381.
Schouten HJ, Geersing GJ, Koek HL, Zuithoff NP, Janssen KJ, Douma RA, et al Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj [Internet]. 2013;346:f2492. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643284 [PMC free article: PMC3643284] [PubMed: 23645857]
382.
Self WH, Barrett TW. Annals of Emergency Medicine journal club. Is “PERC negative” adequate to rule out pulmonary embolism in the emergency department? Evaluating meta-analysis for studies of clinical prediction models. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):129–31. [PubMed: 22720850]
383.
Self WH, Barrett TW. Is “PERC negative” adequate to rule out pulmonary embolism in the emergency department? Evaluating meta-analysis for studies of clinical prediction models. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(1):129–31. [PubMed: 22720850]
384.
Sharma A, Chatterjee S, Lichstein E, Mukherjee D. Extended thromboprophylaxis for medically ill patients with decreased mobility: does it improve outcomes? J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(10):2053–60. [PubMed: 22863355]
385.
Singh B, Parsaik AK, Agarwal D, Surana A, Mascarenhas SS, Chandra S. Diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;59(6):517–20. [PubMed: 22177109]
386.
Squizzato A, Donadini MP, Galli L, Dentali F, Aujesky D, Ageno W. Prognostic clinical prediction rules to identify a low-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jul;10(7):1276–90. [PubMed: 22498033]
387.
Stevens SM. 2011 - Review: Gestalt or clinical decision rules have limited sensitivity and specificity for detecting acute PE [Philadelphia, Pennsylvania]. ACP J Club. 2012 Jan 17;156(1):1. Available from: http://search​.ebscohost​.com/login.aspx?direct​=true&db​=cin20&AN=104527902&site=ehost-live [PubMed: 22250173]
388.
Tafur A. Systematic review: a low wells score and a negative D-dimer was not safe in patients with cancer for ruling out DVT. Evid Based Med. 2014;19(5):188. [PubMed: 24917604]
389.
van Es N, van der Hulle T, van Es J, den Exter PL, Douma RA, Goekoop RJ, et al Excluding pulmonary embolism in cancer patients using the Wells rule and age-adjusted D-dimer testing: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2016 Apr;140: Suppl 1:S179. [PubMed: 27161697]
390.
van Es N, Kraaijpoel N, Klok FA, Huisman MV, den Exter PL, Mos IC, et al The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Apr;15(4):678–684. [PubMed: 28106338]
391.
van Leent MW, Stevanovic J, Jansman FG, Beinema MJ, Brouwers JR, Postma MJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Dabigatran Compared to Vitamin-K Antagonists for the Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis in the Netherlands Using Real-World Data. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Oct 4];10(8):e0135054. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4524689 [PMC free article: PMC4524689] [PubMed: 26241880]
392.
Wessler BS, Lai YL, Kramer W, Cangelosi M, Raman G, Lutz JS, et al Clinical prediction models for cardiovascular disease: The Tufts PACE CPM database. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2016 Oct 4];8(4):368–75. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC4512876/pdf/nihms-692018.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4512876] [PubMed: 26152680]
393.
Witt DM. Review: Positive D-dimer results predict recurrence after first unprovoked VTE regardless of test timing or cutpoint, or patient age [Philadelphia, Pennsylvania]. ACP J Club. 2011 Jan 18;154(1):4. [PubMed: 21242359]
394.
Zhou XY, Ben SQ, Chen HL, Ni SS. The prognostic value of pulmonary embolism severity index in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Respir Res [Internet]. 2012;13:111. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3571977 [PMC free article: PMC3571977] [PubMed: 23210843]
395.
Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, Farsad K, Orr E, Gilman M, Shepard JA. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography. An assessment of the radiology report. Acad Radiol. 2009;16(11):1309–15. [PubMed: 19692272]
396.
Albrizio M, Mizzi A. Rate of computed tomography pulmonary angiographies (CTPA) positive for pulmonary embolism and predictive scores. Radiol Med. 2007 Oct;112(7):982–7. [PubMed: 17952681]
397.
Alhadad A, Miniati M, Alhadad H, Gottsater A, Bajc M. The value of tomographic ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy (V/PSPECT) for follow-up and prediction of recurrence in pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2012 Dec;130(6):877–81. [PubMed: 23026380]
398.
Summaries for patients. Evaluation of patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: best practice advice from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):I34. [PubMed: 26414918]
399.
Summaries for patients. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 6;152(7):I44. [PubMed: 20368644]
400.
Arnason T, Wells PS, Forster AJ. Appropriateness of diagnostic strategies for evaluating suspected venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97(2):195–201. [PubMed: 17264947]
401.
Astani SA, Davis LC, Harkness BA, Supanich MP, Dalal I. Detection of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: comparing radiation doses of CTPA and pulmonary scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun. 2014 Jul;35(7):704–11. [PubMed: 24743314]
402.
Bajc M. Potential of hybrid V/P SPECT-low-dose CT in lung diagnostics. Breathe [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Oct 12];9(1):49–60. Available from: http://breathe​.ersjournals​.com/content/breathe/9/1/48​.full.pdf
403.
Baliga RR. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg. ACC Cardiosource Rev J. 2008;17(6):31–2. [PubMed: 18424324]
404.
Bannas P, Schiebler ML, Motosugi U, Francois CJ, Reeder SB, Nagle SK. Pulmonary MRA: differentiation of pulmonary embolism from truncation artefact. Eur Radiol [Internet]. 2014 Aug [cited 2016 Oct 4];24(8):1942–9. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362685 [PMC free article: PMC4362685] [PubMed: 24863886]
405.
Bates DD, Tkacz JN, LeBedis CA, Holalkere N. Suboptimal CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis of outcomes in a large academic medical center. Emerg Radiol. 2016 Dec;23(6):603–607. [PubMed: 27465236]
406.
Begic A, Opankovic E, Cukic V, Rustempasic M, Basic A, Miniati M, et al Impact of ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography on treatment duration of pulmonary embolism. Nucl Med Commun [Internet]. 2015 Feb [cited 2016 Oct 4];36(2):162–7. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280272 [PMC free article: PMC4280272] [PubMed: 25321156]
407.
Blackmore CC. Evidence-based imaging and cost-effectiveness analysis in cardiopulmonary imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2012;27(5):272–6. [PubMed: 22914120]
408.
Blum AG, Delfau F, Grignon B, Beurrier D, Chabot F, Claudon M, et al Spiral-computed tomography versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of acute massive pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jul 1;74(1):96–8. [PubMed: 8017318]
409.
Boldt BM, Cox CW, Dedekam EA, Tsytsik B, Mysliwiec V. Pulmonary embolism at follow-up outpatient CT pulmonary angiography: implications on patient risk stratification. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013 Sep;24(6):633–7. [PubMed: 23912133]
410.
Bova C, Greco F, Misuraca G, Serafini O, Crocco F, Greco A, et al Diagnostic utility of echocardiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med. 2003 May;21(3):180–3. [PubMed: 12811708]
411.
Stawicki SP, Seamon MJ, Kim PK, Meredith DM, Chovanes J, Schwab CW, et al Transthoracic echocardiography for pulmonary embolism in the ICU: finding the “right” findings. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jan;206(1):42–7. [PubMed: 18155567]
412.
Branch KR, Strote J, Shuman WP, Mitsumori LM, Busey JM, Rue T, et al Diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes of ECG-gated, whole chest CT in the emergency department. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 Oct 4];8(4). Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC3629052/pdf/pone.0061121.pdf [PMC free article: PMC3629052] [PubMed: 23613797]
413.
Cereser L, Bagatto D, Girometti R, Como G, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M. Chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic yield and proportion of other clinically relevant findings. Radiol Med (Torino). 2011 Mar;116(2):219–29. [PubMed: 21311990]
414.
Christiansen F. Diagnostic imaging of acute pulmonary embolism. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1997;410:1–33. [PubMed: 9105183]
415.
Callejas MF, Errazuriz JI, Castillo F, Otarola C, Riquelme C, Ortega C, et al Incidental venous thromboembolism detected by PET-CT in patients with cancer: prevalence and impact on survival rate. Thromb Res. 2014 May;133(5):750–5. [PubMed: 24565275]
416.
Cueto SM, Cavanaugh SH, Benenson RS, Redclift MS. Computed tomography scan versus ventilation-perfusion lung scan in the detection of pulmonary embolism. J Emerg Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):155–64. [PubMed: 11489406]
417.
Darze ES, Braghiroli JF, Almeida RV, Araujo EP, Toscano SM, Araujo-Neto CA. Clinical outcomes after investigation for pulmonary embolism using CT angiography and venography. Arq Bras Cardiol [Internet]. 2012 Aug [cited 2016 Oct 4];99(2):740–6. Available from: http://www​.scielo.br​/pdf/abc/v99n2/en_aop05512.pdf [PubMed: 22735868]
418.
Douma RA, Hofstee HM, Schaefer-Prokop C, van Waesberghe JH, Lely RJ, Kamphuisen PW, et al Comparison of 4- and 64-slice CT scanning in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jan;103(1):242–6. [PubMed: 20062931]
419.
Douma RA, Hofstee HM, Schaefer-Prokop C, van Waesberghe JH, Lely RJ, Kamphuisen PW, et al Comparison of 4- and 64-slice CT scanning in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jan;103(1):242–6. [PubMed: 20062931]
420.
Drucker EA, Rivitz SM, Shepard JA, Boiselle PM, Trotman-Dickenson B, Welch TJ, et al Acute pulmonary embolism: assessment of helical CT for diagnosis. Radiology. 1998 Oct;209(1):235–41. [PubMed: 9769837]
421.
Duralde XA, McClelland WB, Jr. The clinical results of arthroscopic transtendinous repair of grade III partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Feb;28(2):160–8. [PubMed: 22078003]
422.
Easther S, Langdana F, Beasley R, Maharaj D, Entwisle J, Abels P. The diagnostic role of ventilation/perfusion scans versus computed tomography pulmonary angiography in obstetric patients investigated for pulmonary embolism at Wellington Hospital from 2010 to 2012. N Z Med J. 2016;129(1433):62–8. [PubMed: 27349162]
423.
Elias A, Cazanave A, Elias M, Chabbert V, Juchet H, Paradis H, et al Diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism using clinical assessment, plasma D-dimer assay, complete lower limb venous ultrasound and helical computed tomography of pulmonary arteries. A multicentre clinical outcome study. Thromb Haemost. 2005 May;93(5):982–8. [PubMed: 15886818]
424.
Emet M, Ozucelik DN, Sahin M, Oran M, Sivri B. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Adv Ther. 2007 Nov;24(6):1173–80. [PubMed: 18165199]
425.
Engelke C, Rummeny EJ, Marten K. Pulmonary embolism at multi-detector row CT of chest: one-year survival of treated and untreated patients. Radiology [Internet]. 2006 May [cited 2016 Oct 13];239(2):563–75. Available from: 10.1148/radiol.2392050118 [PubMed: 16569782] [CrossRef]
426.
Ersoy H, Goldhaber SZ, Cai T, Luu T, Rosebrook J, Mulkern R, et al Time-resolved MR angiography: a primary screening examination of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2007 May [cited 2016 Oct 6];188(5):1246–54. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.06.0901 [PubMed: 17449767] [CrossRef]
427.
Fabiá Valls MJ, van der Hulle T, den Exter PL, Mos IC, Huisman MV, Klok FA. Performance of a diagnostic algorithm based on a prediction rule, D-dimer and CT-scan for pulmonary embolism in patients with previous venous thromboembolism. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2015 Feb;113(2):406–13. [PubMed: 25373512]
428.
Feragalli B, Galluzzo M, Scaglione M. MDCT venography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: diagnostic impact of pelvic vein evaluation in thromboembolic disease detection. Panminerva Med. 2012 Dec;54(1 Suppl 4):67–72. [PubMed: 23241937]
429.
Ferreira EV, Gazzana MB, Sarmento MB, Guazzelli PA, Hoffmeister MC, Guerra VA, et al Alternative diagnoses based on CT angiography of the chest in patients with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism. J Bras Pneumol [Internet]. 2016 Jan;42(1):35–41. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805385 [PMC free article: PMC4805385] [PubMed: 26982039]
430.
Ferretti GR, Bosson JL, Buffaz PD, Ayanian D, Pison C, Blanc F, et al Acute pulmonary embolism: role of helical CT in 164 patients with intermediate probability at ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and normal results at duplex US of the legs. Radiology. 1997 Nov;205(2):453–8. [PubMed: 9356628]
431.
Flavell RR, Behr SC, Brunsing RL, Naeger DM, Pampaloni MH. The incidence of pulmonary embolism and associated FDG-PET findings in IV contrast-enhanced PET/CT. Acad Radiol. 2014 Jun;21(6):718–25. [PubMed: 24809314]
432.
Friera A, Olivera MJ, Suárez C, Ruiz-Giménez N, Caballero P, Thromboembolic Study Group of La Princesa Hospital. Clinical validity of negative helical computed tomography for clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism. Respiration. 2004 Jan;71(1):30–6. [PubMed: 14872108]
433.
Garg KC, Das KM. 64-slice CT diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care. 2008;8(1):38–41.
434.
Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, Subber SW, Russ PD, Johnston RJ, et al Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning--correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology. 1998 Jul;208(1):201–8. [PubMed: 9646814]
435.
Garg K, Sieler H, Welsh CH, Johnston RJ, Russ PD. Clinical validity of helical CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism: implications for patient treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 1999 Jun [cited 2017 Jan 16];172(6):1627–31. Available from: 10.2214/ajr.172.6.10350303 [PubMed: 10350303] [CrossRef]
436.
Ghazvinian R, Gottsater A, Elf J. Is it safe to withhold long-term anticoagulation therapy in patients with small pulmonary emboli diagnosed by SPECT scintigraphy? Thrombosis Journal [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Oct 7];14:12. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC4886445/pdf/12959_2016_Article_86​.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4886445] [PubMed: 27247527]
437.
Glaser JE, Chamarthy M, Haramati LB, Esses D, Freeman LM. Successful and safe implementation of a trinary interpretation and reporting strategy for V/Q lung scintigraphy. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2016 Oct 7];52(10):1508–12. Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/52/10/1508.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 21803837]
438.
Gleeson FV, Turner S, Scarsbrook AF. Improving the diagnostic performance of lung scintigraphy in suspected pulmonary embolic disease. Clin Radiol. 2006 Dec;61(12):1010–5. [PubMed: 17097421]
439.
Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, Liu Y, McAuliffe TL, O’Brien DJ. Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram--prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology [Internet]. 2000 May [cited 2016 Dec 1];215(2):535–42. Available from: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma23535 [PubMed: 10796937] [CrossRef]
440.
Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, Artaud D, Beregi JP, Hossein-Foucher C, et al Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology. 1996 Sep;200(3):699–706. [PubMed: 8756918]
441.
Grimm LJ, Coleman RE. Assessing the utility of the ventilation phase in ventilation-perfusion imaging for acute pulmonary embolism. Nucl Med Commun. 2013 Jan;34(1):1–4. [PubMed: 23111382]
442.
Gruettner J, Fink C, Walter T, Meyer M, Apfaltrer P, Schoepf UJ, et al Coronary computed tomography and triple rule out CT in patients with acute chest pain and an intermediate cardiac risk profile. Part 1: Impact on patient management. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(1):100–5. [PubMed: 22749769]
443.
Gruettner J, Walter T, Bolte M, Haghi D, Sudarski S, Henzler T. Incidence of pulmonary embolism in an emergency department cohort evaluated with a simple symptom-based diagnostic algorithm. In Vivo. 2013 Mar;27(2):215–20. [PubMed: 23422481]
444.
Hansch A, Betge S, Poehlmann G, Neumann S, Baltzer P, Pfeil A, et al Combined magnetic resonance imaging of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary arteries after a single injection of a blood pool contrast agent. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(2):318–25. [PubMed: 20694795]
445.
Hata T, Ikeda M, Nakamori S, Suzuki R, Kim T, Yasui M, et al Single-photon emission computed tomography in the screening for postoperative pulmonary embolism. Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Nov;51(11):2073–80. [PubMed: 16977506]
446.
Hayes SA, Soff GA, Zabor EC, Moskowitz CS, Liu CC, Ginsberg MS. Clinical consequences of an indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram in cancer patients. Clin Imaging [Internet]. 2014 Sep [cited 2016 Oct 4];38(5):637–40. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431545 [PMC free article: PMC4431545] [PubMed: 24928823]
447.
Hirsch AM, Kahn SR, Morris T, Wells PS, Rodger M, Kovacs MJ, et al PEDS (pulmonary embolism diagnosis study) a randomized controlled trial of CT pulmonary angiography and V/Q scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;A783p.
448.
Hochuli M, Duewell S, Frauchiger B. Quantitative d-dimer levels and the extent of venous thromboembolism in CT angiography and lower limb ultrasonography. VASA. 2007 Nov;36(4):267–74. [PubMed: 18357919]
449.
Hofman MS, Beauregard JM, Barber TW, Neels OC, Eu P, Hicks RJ. 68Ga PET/CT ventilation-perfusion imaging for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study with comparison to conventional scintigraphy. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2011 Oct [cited 2016 Oct 7];52(10):1513–9. Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/52/10/1513.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 21908388]
450.
Holmquist F, Hansson K, Pasquariello F, Bjork J, Nyman U. Minimizing contrast medium doses to diagnose pulmonary embolism with 80-kVp multidetector computed tomography in azotemic patients. Acta Radiol. 2009 Mar;50(2):181–93. [PubMed: 19169917]
451.
Hou DJ, Tso DK, Davison C, Inacio J, Louis LJ, Nicolaou S, et al Clinical utility of ultra high pitch dual source thoracic CT imaging of acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: are we one step closer towards a non-gated triple rule out? Eur J Radiol. 2013 Oct;82(10):1793–8. [PubMed: 23743054]
452.
Howarth DM, Booker JA, Voutnis DD. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolus using ventilation/perfusion lung scintigraphy: more than 0.5 segment of ventilation/perfusion mismatch is sufficient. Intern Med J. 2006 May;36(5):281–8. [PubMed: 16650192]
453.
Hsiao SH, Lee CY, Chang SM, Yang SH, Lin SK, Chiou KR. Usefulness of pulmonary arterial flow discordance to identify pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Feb 15;99(4):579–83. [PubMed: 17293207]
454.
Hunsaker AR, Zou KH, Poh AC, Trotman-Dickenson B, Jacobson FL, Gill RR, et al Routine pelvic and lower extremity CT venography in patients undergoing pulmonary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2008 Feb [cited 2016 Oct 7];190(2):322–6. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.07.2568 [PubMed: 18212216] [CrossRef]
455.
Hussein W, Dalouk KA, O’Brien A. Negative predictive value of CTPA in pulmonary embolism in an Irish population. Ir Med J. 2008 Mar;101(3):92–3. [PubMed: 18543431]
456.
Ingrisch M, Maxien D, Meinel FG, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K, Dietrich O. Detection of pulmonary embolism with free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2016;43(4):887–93. [PubMed: 26391931]
457.
Inonu H, Acu B, Pazarli AC, Doruk S, Erkorkmaz U, Altunkas A. The value of the computed tomographic obstruction index in the identification of massive pulmonary thromboembolism. Diagn Interv Radiol [Internet]. 2012 May [cited 2016 Oct 4];18(3):255–60. Available from: http://www​.dirjournal​.org/sayilar/43/buyuk/pdf_DIR_433.pdf [PubMed: 22249888]
458.
Jia CF, Li YX, Yang ZQ, Zhang ZH, Sun XX, Wang ZQ. Prospective evaluation of unsuspected pulmonary embolism on coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Mar;36(2):187–90. [PubMed: 22446357]
459.
Jögi J, Jonson B, Ekberg M, Bajc M. Ventilation-perfusion SPECT with 99mTc-DTPA versus Technegas: a head-to-head study in obstructive and nonobstructive disease. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2010 May [cited 2016 Oct 7];51(5):735–41. Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/51/5/735.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 20395338]
460.
Jogi J, Markstad H, Tufvesson E, Bjermer L, Bajc M. The added value of hybrid ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT in patients with stable COPD or apparently healthy smokers. Cancer-suspected CT findings in the lungs are common when hybrid imaging is used. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Oct 4];10:25–30. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4279608 [PMC free article: PMC4279608] [PubMed: 25565797]
461.
Jones C, Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Keesara SR, Rhee P, Brown C, et al Combined CT venography and CT pulmonary angiography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis in injured patients. Am Surg. 2008 Oct;74(10):935–8. [PubMed: 18942617]
462.
Jordan EJ, Godelman A, Levsky JM, Zalta B, Haramati LB. CT pulmonary angiography in pregnant and postpartum women: low yield, high dose. Clin Imaging. 2015 Mar;39(2):251–3. [PubMed: 25482354]
463.
Junger M, Diehm C, Storiko H, Hach-Wunderle V, Heidrich H, Karasch T, et al Mobilization versus immobilization in the treatment of acute proximal deep venous thrombosis: a prospective, randomized, open, multicentre trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Mar;22(3):593–602. [PubMed: 16574042]
464.
Kado R, Siegwald E, Lewis E, Goodsitt MM, Christodoulou E, Kazerooni E, et al Utility and associated risk of pulmonary embolism computed tomography scans in the Michigan lupus cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Mar;68(3):406–11. [PubMed: 26239640]
465.
Kamel EM, Schmidt S, Doenz F, Adler-Etechami G, Schnyder P, Qanadli SD. Computed tomographic angiography in acute pulmonary embolism: do we need multiplanar reconstructions to evaluate the right ventricular dysfunction? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 May;32(3):438–43. [PubMed: 18520553]
466.
Kaul D, Grupp U, Kahn J, Ghadjar P, Wiener E, Hamm B, et al Reducing radiation dose in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and lower tube potential in computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2014 Nov;24(11):2685–91. [PubMed: 25007868]
467.
Kiley CA, Lowry KJ, Mysliwiec V. Examination of hospital referral practices for CT pulmonary angiography. J Hosp Med. 2007 Jul;2(4):253–7. [PubMed: 17702044]
468.
Kim HJ, Walcott-Sapp S, Leggett K, Bass A, Adler RS, Pavlov H, et al The Use of spiral computed tomography scans for the detection of pulmonary embolism. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:(6 Suppl):31–5. [PubMed: 18722301]
469.
Kindermann DR, McCarthy ML, Ding R, Frohna WJ, Hansen J, Maloy K, et al Emergency department variation in utilization and diagnostic yield of advanced radiography in diagnosis of pulmonary embolus. J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;46(6):791–9. [PubMed: 24636611]
470.
King-Im JM, Freeman SJ, Boylan T, Cheow HK. Quality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy. Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec;18(12):2709–15. [PubMed: 18651151]
471.
Kligerman S, Lahiji K, Weihe E, Lin CT, Terpenning S, Jeudy J, et al Detection of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography: improvement using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm compared with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction algorithms. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Jan;30(1):60–8. [PubMed: 25423129]
472.
Kline JA, Webb WB, Jones AE, Hernandez-Nino J. Impact of a rapid rule-out protocol for pulmonary embolism on the rate of screening, missed cases, and pulmonary vascular imaging in an urban US emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;44(5):490–502. [PubMed: 15520709]
473.
Kluge A, Muller C, Hansel J, Gerriets T, Bachmann G. Real-time MR with TrueFISP for the detection of acute pulmonary embolism: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol. 2004 Apr;14(4):709–18. [PubMed: 14658001]
474.
Koch C, Schramm R, Roller FC, Hecker A, Henrich M, Schneck E, et al Impact of unsuspected subsegmental pulmonary embolism in ICU patients. Anaesthesist. 2016 Feb;65(2):122–8. [PubMed: 26661080]
475.
Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A. Management of pulmonary embolism: recent evidence and the new European guidelines. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 2014 Dec [cited 2016 Aug 16];44(6):1385–90. Available from: http://erj​.ersjournals​.com/content/erj/44/6/1385.full.pdf [PubMed: 25435521]
476.
Kooiman J, Klok FA, Mos IC, van der MA, DE RA, Sijpkens YW, et al Incidence and predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy following CT-angiography for clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost [Internet]. 2010 Feb [cited 2016 Oct 7];8(2):409–11. Available from: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03698.x/epdf [PubMed: 19943871] [CrossRef]
477.
Korkeila PJ, Saraste MK, Nyman KM, Koistinen J, Lund J, Juhani Airaksinen KE. Transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of thrombosis associated with permanent transvenous pacemaker electrodes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Nov;29(11):1245–50. [PubMed: 17100678]
478.
Krestan CR, Klein N, Fleischmann D, Kaneider A, Novotny C, Kreuzer S, et al Value of negative spiral CT angiography in patients with suspected acute PE: analysis of PE occurrence and outcome. Eur Radiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):93–8. [PubMed: 12942280]
479.
Krishan S, Panditaratne N, Verma R, Robertson R. Incremental value of CT venography combined with pulmonary CT angiography for the detection of thromboembolic disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May;196(5):1065–72. [PubMed: 21512072]
480.
Kroschel U, Seitz K, Reuss J, Rettenmaier G. [Sonographic imaging of lung emboli. Results of a prospective study]. Ultraschall Med. 1991 Dec;12(6):263–8. German. [PubMed: 1796285]
481.
Kwon WJ, Jeong YJ, Kim KI, Lee IS, Jeon UB, Lee SH, et al Computed tomographic features of pulmonary septic emboli: comparison of causative microorganisms. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 May;31(3):390–4. [PubMed: 17538285]
482.
Lang O, Balon HR, Píichová R, Krizova H, Kuníková I. Lung tissue density measured by low-dose CT during pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT as a tool for differentiation pulmonary embolism from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A pilot study. Cor et Vasa. 2013 [cited 2016 Oct 12];55(6):e492–e496.
483.
Lapergue B, Decroix JP, Evrard S, Wang A, Bendetowicz D, Offroy MA, et al Diagnostic yield of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism by combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Eur Neurol. 2015;74(1–2):69–72. [PubMed: 26228469]
484.
Le Roux P-Y, Delluc A, Abgral R, Reffad A, Cornily JC, Querellou S, et al Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose of venous thromboembolism. Medecine Nucleaire. 2011;35(4):179–85. French.
485.
Le Roux PY, Abgral R, Jaffrelot M, Delluc A, Gut-Gobert C, Querellou S, et al Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: planar images generated from V/Q SPECT are not a reliable substitute for traditional planar V/Q scan. Nucl Med Commun. 2012 Jul;33(7):695–700. [PubMed: 22441133]
486.
Le Roux PY, Robin P, Delluc A, Tardy B, Abgral R, Couturaud F, et al Performance of 18F fluoro-2-desoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res. 2015 Jan;135(1):31–5. [PubMed: 25455997]
487.
Lee EY, Khong PL. The value of 18F-FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT in detection of tumor thrombus. Clin Nucl Med. 2013 Feb;38(2):e60–e65. [PubMed: 23334142]
488.
Lemb M, Pohlabeln H. Pulmonary thromboembolism: a retrospective study on the examination of 991 patients by ventilation/perfusion SPECT using Technegas. NuklearMedizin. 2001 Dec;40(6):179–86. [PubMed: 11797505]
489.
Lessler AL, Isserman JA, Agarwal R, Palevsky HI, Pines JM. Testing low-risk patients for suspected pulmonary embolism: a decision analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;55(4):316–26. [PubMed: 20061065]
490.
Lim KY, Kligerman SJ, Lin CT, White CS. Missed pulmonary embolism on abdominal CT. Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 7];202(4):738–43. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.13.11436 [PubMed: 24660700] [CrossRef]
491.
Lombard J, Bhatia R, Sala E. Spiral computed tomographic pulmonary angiography for investigating suspected pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2003 Jun;54(3):147–51. [PubMed: 12866238]
492.
Lomis NN, Yoon HC, Moran AG, Miller FJ. Clinical outcomes of patients after a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999 Jun;10(6):707–12. [PubMed: 10392937]
493.
Macdonald WB, Patrikeos AP, Thompson RI, Adler BD, van der Schaaf AA. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: ventilation perfusion scintigraphy versus helical computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Australas Radiol. 2005 Feb;49(1):32–8. [PubMed: 15727607]
494.
Mao X, Wang S, Jiang X, Zhang L, Xu W. Diagnostic value of dual-source computerized tomography combined with perfusion imaging for peripheral pulmonary embolism. Iranian Journal of Radiology. 2016;13(2). [PMC free article: PMC5039736] [PubMed: 27703656]
495.
Mathis G, Metzler J, Feurstein M, Fussenegger D, Sutterlutti G. [Lung infarcts detected with ultrasonography]. Ultraschall Med. 1990 Dec;11(6):281–3 German. [PubMed: 2087652]
496.
Mathis G, Bitschnau R, Gehmacher O, Scheier M, Kopf A, Schwarzler B, et al Chest ultrasound in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in comparison to helical CT. Ultraschall Med. 1999 Apr;20(2):54–9. [PubMed: 10407975]
497.
Mathis G, Blank W, Reissig A, Lechleitner P, Reuss J, Schuler A, et al Thoracic ultrasound for diagnosing pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicenter study of 352 patients. Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3):1531–8. [PubMed: 16162754]
498.
Meinel FG, Nance JW, Schoepf UJ, Hoffmann VS, Thierfelder KM, Costello P, et al Predictive Value of Computed Tomography in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2015 Jul;128(7):747–59. [PubMed: 25680885]
499.
Meysman M, Everaert H, Buls N, Nieboer K, de MJ. Comparison of ventilation-perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (V/Q SPECT) versus dual-energy CT perfusion and angiography (DECT) after 6 months of pulmonary embolism (PE) treatment. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Sep;84(9):1816–9. [PubMed: 26074385]
500.
Miniati M, Monti S, Pratali L, Di RG, Marini C, Formichi B, et al Value of transthoracic echocardiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of a prospective study in unselected patients. Am J Med. 2001 May;110(7):528–35. [PubMed: 11343666]
501.
Minshall CT, Doben AR, Leon SM, Fakhry SM, Eriksson EA. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography: more than a screening tool for pulmonary embolus. J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):196–200. [PubMed: 25449879]
502.
Moon KT. SPECT V/Q scintigraphy is an option for diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82(5):531–2.
503.
Morales-Borrero WJ, Maldonado-Vargas JA. Diagnostic yield of pulmonary CT angiography in the evaluation of pulmonary embolisms treated at the Puerto Rico Medical Center from 2008 to 2012. P R Health Sci J. 2016 Mar;35(1):16–9. [PubMed: 26932279]
504.
Morris TA, Gerometta M, Smart RC, Eisenberg P, Roach PJ, Tsui WW, et al Pulmonary Emboli Imaging with 99mTc-labelled Anti-D-dimer (DI-80B3) Fab’ Followed by SPECT. Heart Lung and Circulation. 2011;20(8):503–11. [PubMed: 21570351]
505.
Morris TA, Gerometta M, Yusen RD, White RH, Douketis JD, Kaatz S, et al Detection of pulmonary emboli with 99mTc-labeled anti-D-dimer (DI-80B3)Fab’ fragments (ThromboView). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep 15;184(6):708–14. [PubMed: 21680946]
506.
Mortensen J, Gutte H. SPECT/CT and pulmonary embolism. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2014;41:(Suppl 1):S81–S90. [PMC free article: PMC4003400] [PubMed: 24213621]
507.
Muangman N, Totanarungroj K. Cost effectiveness of combined CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and indirect CTV in patient with intermediate to high probability for pulmonary embolism. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Oct;95(10):1321–6. [PubMed: 23193748]
508.
Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, Maitre S, Girard P, Leroyer C, et al Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1914–20. [PubMed: 12493257]
509.
Nazaroglu H, Ozmen CA, Akay HO, Kilinc I, Bilici A. 64-MDCT pulmonary angiography and CT venography in the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Mar;192(3):654–61. [PubMed: 19234261]
510.
Nobre C, Thomas B. Ultrasound in suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2014;146(3):e109. [PubMed: 25180736]
511.
Palla A, Marconi L, Bigazzi F, Pistolesi M. Lung scintigraphy in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: pathophysiological and practical evidence. Clinical and Translational Imaging. 2014;2(5):363–7.
512.
Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ, de MP, Lepage R, Slosman D, et al Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet. 1999 Jan 16;353(9148):190–5. [PubMed: 9923874]
513.
Perrier A, Roy PM, Aujesky D, Chagnon I, Howarth N, Gourdier AL, et al Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med. 2004 Mar 1;116(5):291–9. [PubMed: 14984813]
514.
Precious BJ, Raju R, Leipsic J. Recent advances in thoracic x-ray computed tomography for pulmonary imaging. Can Respir J [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 7];21(5):307–9. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC4198234/pdf/crj-21-307.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4198234] [PubMed: 24791258]
515.
Prevedello LM, Raja AS, Ip IK, Sodickson A, Khorasani R. Does clinical decision support reduce unwarranted variation in yield of CT pulmonary angiogram? Am J Med [Internet]. 2013 Nov [cited 2017 Jan 16];126(11):975–81. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC4438082/pdf/nihms-526508.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4438082] [PubMed: 24157288]
516.
Quinn RJ, Nour R, Butler SP, Glenn DW, Travers PL, Wellings G, et al Pulmonary embolism in patients with intermediate probability lung scans: diagnosis with Doppler venous US and D-dimer measurement. Radiology. 1994 Feb;190(2):509–11. [PubMed: 8284407]
517.
Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, Kipfmueller F, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ, et al Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005 Apr 27;293(16):2012–7. [PubMed: 15855435]
518.
Raja AS, Ip IK, Prevedello LM, Sodickson AD, Farkas C, Zane RD, et al Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. Radiology [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Nov 16];262(2):468–74. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC3267081/pdf/110951.pdf [PMC free article: PMC3267081] [PubMed: 22187633]
519.
Ranji SR, Shojania KG, Trowbridge RL, Auerbach AD. Impact of reliance on CT pulmonary angiography on diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a Bayesian analysis. J Hosp Med. 2006 Mar;1(2):81–7. [PubMed: 17219477]
520.
Reagle Z, Tringali S, Gill N, Peterson MW. Diagnostic yield and renal complications after computed tomography pulmonary angiograms performed in a community-based academic hospital. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Oct 4];2. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3714054 [PMC free article: PMC3714054] [PubMed: 23882362]
521.
Reichelt A, Hoeper MM, Galanski M, Keberle M. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: evaluation with 64-detector row CT versus digital substraction angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jul;71(1):49–54. [PubMed: 18462902]
522.
Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique--comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 1992 Nov;185(2):381–7. [PubMed: 1410342]
523.
Remy-Jardin M, Tillie-Leblond I, Szapiro D, Ghaye B, Cotte L, Mastora I, et al CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value. Eur Radiol. 2002 Aug;12(8):1971–8. [PubMed: 12136315]
524.
Richard MC, Lambert R, Rey E, Turpin S. Is perfusion scintigraphy sufficient in pregnant or post-partum women? Medecine Nucleaire. 2015;39(6):479–85. French.
525.
Ritchie G, McGurk S, McCreath C, Graham C, Murchison JT. Prospective evaluation of unsuspected pulmonary embolism on contrast enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) scanning. Thorax [Internet]. 2007 Jun [cited 2016 Oct 6];62(6):536–40. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2117210 [PMC free article: PMC2117210] [PubMed: 17158631]
526.
Rodger MA, Bredeson CN, Jones G, Rasuli P, Raymond F, Clement AM, et al The bedside investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis study: a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing combinations of 3 bedside tests vs ventilation-perfusion scan for the initial investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jan 23;166(2):181–7. [PubMed: 16432086]
527.
Rubins JB. The current approach to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: lessons from PIOPED II. Postgrad Med. 2008 Apr;120(1):1–7. [PubMed: 18467802]
528.
Ruiz Y, Caballero P, Caniego JL, Friera A, Olivera MJ, Tagarro D, et al Prospective comparison of helical CT with angiography in pulmonary embolism: global and selective vascular territory analysis. Interobserver agreement. Eur Radiol. 2003 Apr;13(4):823–9. [PubMed: 12664123]
529.
Sakuma M, Nakamura M, Nakanishi N, Miyahara Y, Tanabe N, Yamada N, et al Diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for acute pulmonary thromboembolism. Intern Med [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2016 Oct 13];45(12):749–58. Available from: https://www​.jstage.jst​.go.jp/article/internalmedicine​/45/12/45_12_749/_pdf [PubMed: 16847363]
530.
Salaun PY, Le Duc-Pennec A, Le Gal G, Couturaud F, Guillo P, Mottier D, et al Management of suspected pulmonary embolism patients with low clinical and low V/Q probability. Thromb Res. 2008;122(4):450–4. [PubMed: 18068217]
531.
Sampson FC, Goodacre SW, Thomas SM, van Beek EJ. The accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of suspected deep vein thrombosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2007 Jan;17(1):175–81. [PubMed: 16628439]
532.
Sangwaiya MJ, Kalra MK, Sharma A, Halpern EF, Shepard JA, Digumarthy SR. Dual-energy computed tomographic pulmonary angiography: a pilot study to assess the effect on image quality and diagnostic confidence. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Jan;34(1):46–51. [PubMed: 20118721]
533.
Sasbou T, Tachinante R, Tazi Saoud A, Ksayr R, Ben Rais Aouad N. Place of scintigraphy in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnant women-About 17 cases. Medecine Nucleaire. 2013;37(10–11):439–45. French.
534.
Sawyer KN, Shah P, Qu L, Kurz MC, Clark CL, Swor RA. Triple rule ot versus CT angiogram plus stress test for evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department. West J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2015 Sep [cited 2016 Oct 4];16(5):677–82. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4644034 [PMC free article: PMC4644034] [PubMed: 26587090]
535.
Schiebler ML, Ahuja J, Repplinger MD, Francois CJ, Vigen KK, Grist TM, et al Incidence of actionable findings on contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography ordered for pulmonary embolism evaluation. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Aug;85(8):1383–9. [PMC free article: PMC7304888] [PubMed: 27423676]
536.
Schonfeld C, Cebotari S, Voskrebenzev A, Gutberlet M, Hinrichs J, Renne J, et al Performance of perfusion-weighted Fourier decomposition MRI for detection of chronic pulmonary emboli. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jul;42(1):72–9. [PubMed: 25227559]
537.
Scialpi M, Rebonato A, Cagini L, Brunese L, Piscioli I, Pierotti L, et al Split-bolus single-pass multidetector-row CT protocol for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Iranian Journal of Radiology [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Oct 7];13(1):e19844. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC4837285/pdf/iranjradiol-13-01-19844.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4837285] [PubMed: 27110334]
538.
Scott K, Rutherford N, Fagermo N, Lust K. Use of imaging for investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Med [Internet]. 2011 Mar [cited 2016 Oct 6];4(1):20–3. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989656 [PMC free article: PMC4989656] [PubMed: 27579091]
539.
Sellem A, Elajmi W, Mahjoub Y, Hammami H. Diagnosis pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: contribution of lung scintigraphy. Retrospective study about 116cases. Medecine Nucleaire. 2013;37(10–11):432–8. French.
540.
Serra W, Crisafulli E, Sverzellati N, Ugolotti PT, Tzani P, Marangio E, et al Transthoracic echocardiography and chest computed tomography arteriography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a two-year follow-up study. Respiration. 2016;92(4):235–240. [PubMed: 27603702]
541.
Shahir K, Goodman LR, Lam CA, Midia EC. Dose reduction of 69% for computed tomography pulmonary angiography: reduced z-axis computed tomography pulmonary angiography retains accuracy in those younger than 40 years. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 Sep;37(5):765–9. [PubMed: 24045255]
542.
Shao W, Zhang F, Zuo S, Wang X, Song J. Lower limb deep vein thrombosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism detected with 99mTc-MAA simultaneously with lung perfusion scan. Hell J Nucl Med. 2012;15(3):220–3+270. [PubMed: 23106054]
543.
Shapiro MD, Dodd JD, Kalva S, Wittram C, Hsu J, Nasir K, et al A comprehensive electrocardiogram-gated 64-slice multidetector computed tomography imaging protocol to visualize the coronary arteries, thoracic aorta, and pulmonary vasculature in a single breath hold. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Mar;33(2):225–32. [PubMed: 19346850]
544.
Silva S, Biendel C, Ruiz J, Olivier M, Bataille B, Geeraerts T, et al Usefulness of cardiothoracic chest ultrasound in the management of acute respiratory failure in critical care practice. Chest. 2013 Sep;144(3):859–65. [PubMed: 23670087]
545.
Sinzinger H, Berent R, Kummer F. Value of ventilation/perfusion SPECT for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2015;42(6):977–8. [PubMed: 25708178]
546.
Slater S, Oswal D, Bhartia B. A retrospective study of the value of indirect CT venography: a British perspective. Br J Radiol [Internet]. 2012 Jul [cited 2016 Oct 4];85(1015):917–20. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474055 [PMC free article: PMC3474055] [PubMed: 21896661]
547.
Hoo GW, Wu CC, Vazirani S, Li Z, Barack BM. Does a clinical decision rule using D-dimer level improve the yield of pulmonary CT angiography? AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2011 May [cited 2017 Jan 16];196(5):1059–64. Available from: 10.2214/AJR.10.4200 [PubMed: 21512071] [CrossRef]
548.
Sostman HD, Layish DT, Tapson VF, Spritzer CE, DeLong DM, Trotter P, et al Prospective comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996 Mar;6(2):275–81. [PubMed: 9132089]
549.
Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG, Wakefield TW, Tapson VF, Sostman HD, et al Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II investigators. Am J Med. 2006 Dec;119(12):1048–55. [PubMed: 17145249]
550.
Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Sostman HD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al Methods of prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis III (PIOPED III). Semin Nucl Med [Internet]. 2008 Nov [cited 2016 Oct 7];38(6):462–70. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2605689 [PMC free article: PMC2605689] [PubMed: 19331840]
551.
Steiner P, Phillips F, Wesner D, Lund GK, Kreymann G, Nicolas V, et al [Primary diagnosis and follow-up in acute pulmonary embolism: comparison of digital subtraction angiography and spiral CT]. Rofo. 1994 Oct;161(4):285–91. German. [PubMed: 7948973]
552.
Stone E, Roach P, Bernard E, Briggs G, Havryk A, Faulder K, et al Use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolismin patients with an intermediate probability ventilation/perfusion scan. Intern Med J. 2003 Mar;33(3):74–8. [PubMed: 12603578]
553.
Su J, Zhai RY, Jiang T, Ma ZH, Liu M. Suspected pulmonary thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis: a comprehensive 64-slice multidetector computed tomography diagnosis in gynecologic patients. Chin Med J [Internet]. 2015 Jun 5 [cited 2016 Oct 4];128(11):1549–51. Available from: http://www​.cmj.org/temp​/ChinMedJ128111549-4431971_121839.pdf [PMC free article: PMC4733758] [PubMed: 26021515]
554.
Subedi D, Bell D, Lewinski MJB, Aslam S, Murchison JT. Use of SimpliRED D-dimer assay and computerised tomography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Acute Med. 2009;8(2):84–6. [PubMed: 21603677]
555.
Subramaniam RM, Chou T, Swarbrick M, Karalus N. Pulmonary embolism: accuracy and safety of a negative CT pulmonary angiogram and value of a negative D-dimer assay to exclude CT pulmonary angiogram-detectable pulmonary embolism. Australas Radiol. 2006 Oct;50(5):424–8. [PubMed: 16981937]
556.
Sun S, Semionov A, Xie X, Kosiuk J, Mesurolle B. Detection of central pulmonary embolism on non-contrast computed tomography: a case control study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;30(3):639–46. [PubMed: 24390296]
557.
Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF, Ryu JH, Pickett DD, Schleck CD, Ilstrup DM, et al Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Feb;77(2):130–8. [PubMed: 11838646]
558.
Szucs-Farkas Z, Schaller C, Bensler S, Patak MA, Vock P, Schindera ST. Detection of pulmonary emboli with CT angiography at reduced radiation exposure and contrast material volume: comparison of 80 kVp and 120 kVp protocols in a matched cohort. Invest Radiol. 2009 Dec;44(12):793–9. [PubMed: 19884825]
559.
Szucs-Farkas Z, Christe A, Megyeri B, Rohacek M, Vock P, Nagy EV, et al Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography pulmonary angiography with reduced radiation and contrast material dose: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Invest Radiol. 2014 Apr;49(4):201–8. [PubMed: 24473367]
560.
Takagi H, Umemoto T. An algorithm for managing suspected pulmonary embolism. JAMA. 2006;295(22):2603–4. [PubMed: 16772621]
561.
Takahashi EA, Yoon HC. Four-year cumulative radiation exposure in patients undergoing computed tomography angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism. Radiology Research and Practice [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 Oct 7];482403. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC3745975/pdf/RRP2013-482403.pdf [PMC free article: PMC3745975] [PubMed: 23984065]
562.
Tarr GP, Modahl L, Jones P. Wells score, D-dimer testing and computer tomographic pulmonary angiography appropriateness in the Auckland Hospital Adult Emergency Department. N Z Med J [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Oct 14];128(1413):81–3. Available from: https://www​.nzma.org​.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file​/0015/42171/Tarr.pdf [PubMed: 26101126]
563.
Thomeer MG, Pattynama PM, Hartmann IJ, Kieft GJ, Van Strijen MJ. High incidence of isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli on multi-slice spiral CT: a comparative clinical study. Thromb Haemost. 2006 May;95(5):914–5. [PubMed: 16676095]
564.
Tiseo M, Bersanelli M, Pesenti BM, Bartolotti M, De LG, Gelsomino F, et al Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in lung cancer: prevalence and analysis of clinical and radiological characteristics in 141 outpatients. Tumori. 2012 Sep;98(5):594–600. [PubMed: 23235754]
565.
Tresoldi S, Kim YH, Baker SP, Kandarpa K. MDCT of 220 consecutive patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: incidence of pulmonary embolism and of other acute or non-acute thoracic findings. Radiol Med (Torino). 2008 Apr;113(3):373–84. [PubMed: 18493774]
566.
Tunariu N, Gibbs SJ, Win Z, Gin-Sing W, Graham A, Gishen P, et al Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is more sensitive than multidetector CTPA in detecting chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease as a treatable cause of pulmonary hypertension. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2007 May [cited 2016 Oct 6];48(5):680–4. Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/48/5/680.full.pdf+html [PubMed: 17475953]
567.
Turkstra F, Kuijer PM, van Beek EJ, Brandjes DP, ten Cate JW, Buller HR. Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1997 May 15;126(10):775–81. [PubMed: 9148650]
568.
van Belle A., Buller HR, Huisman MV, Huisman PM, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, et al Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):172–9. [PubMed: 16403929]
569.
Perrier A, Miron MJ, Desmarais S, de MP, Slosman D, Didier D, et al Using clinical evaluation and lung scan to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism: is it a valid option in patients with normal results of lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography? Arch Intern Med. 2000 Feb 28;160(4):512–6. [PubMed: 10695691]
570.
van Rossum AB, Treurniet FE, Kieft GJ, Smith SJ, Schepers-Bok R. Role of spiral volumetric computed tomographic scanning in the assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism and an abnormal ventilation/perfusion lung scan. Thorax [Internet]. 1996 Jan [cited 2017 Jan 16];51(1):23–8. Available from: https://www​.ncbi.nlm​.nih.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC472794/pdf/thorax00320-0031.pdf [PMC free article: PMC472794] [PubMed: 8658363]
571.
Viau P, Franken P, Padovani B, Koulibaly PM, Benoliel J, Razzouk M, et al Hybrid imaging for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: contribution of CT combined to V/P SPECT. Med Nucl. 2011;35(3):117–25. French.
572.
Vongchaiudomchoke T, Boonyasirinant T. Positive Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Clinical Prediction Rules, Thromboembolic Risk Factors, and Implications for Appropriate Use. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jan;99(1):25–33. [PubMed: 27455821]
573.
Wu L, Yao Y, Chen G, Fan X, Zheng L, Ding L, et al Intracardiac thrombosis in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;25(12):1359–62. [PubMed: 25081060]
574.
Wu HW, Cheng JJ, Li JY, Yin Y, Hua J, Xu JR. Pulmonary embolism detection and characterization through quantitative iodine-based material decomposition images with spectral computed tomography imaging. Invest Radiol. 2012;47(1):85–91. [PubMed: 22107805]
575.
Yasui T, Tanabe N, Terada J, Yanagawa N, Shimizu H, Matsubara H, et al Multidetector-row computed tomography management of acute pulmonary embolism. Circ J [Internet]. 2007 Dec [cited 2016 Oct 7];71(12):1948–54. Available from: https://www​.jstage.jst​.go.jp/article/circj​/71/12/71_12_1948/_pdf [PubMed: 18037752]
576.
Zhu L, Wang C, Yang Y, Wu Y, Zhai Z, Dai H, et al Value of transthoracic echocardiography in therapy regimens evaluation in pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008 Dec;26(3):251–6. [PubMed: 17705052]
577.
Doyle NM, Ramirez MM, Mastrobattista JM, Monga M, Wagner LK, Gardner MO. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;191(3):1019–23. [PubMed: 15467583]
578.
Larcos G, Chi KK, Shiell A, Berry G. Suspected acute pulmonary emboli: cost-effectiveness of chest helical computed tomography versus a standard diagnostic algorithm incorporating ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Aust N Z J Med. 2000 Apr;30(2):195–201. [PubMed: 10833110]
579.
Ward MJ, Sodickson A, Diercks DB, Raja AS. Cost-effectiveness of lower extremity compression ultrasound in emergency department patients with a high risk of hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(1):22–31. [PubMed: 21414059]
580.
Nijkeuter M, Ginsberg JS, Huisman MV. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Mar;4(3):496–500. [PubMed: 16405518]
Copyright © 2018 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

The copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document for non-commercial purposes only, provided it is not modified when reproduced and appropriate credit is given to CADTH and its licensors.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Bookshelf ID: NBK538862

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (11M)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...