U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Responsibilities of EMS at Crash Sites

; .

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: February 15, 2025.

Introduction

Emergency medical services (EMS) have several responsibilities at the crash site, whether involving an automobile, aircraft, boat, or other types of vehicles. The key responsibilities of EMS covered in this resource include scene safety evaluation, triage coordination, prehospital medical treatment, and crash site investigation.

Issues of Concern

Scene Safety Evaluation

Scene safety evaluation should begin before EMS responders arrive at the incident site. Based on the available information, the review begins by determining whether it is safe for EMS responders to proceed to the scene and what safety equipment is required. Crash sites are highly dynamic environments that may change from safe to unsafe. Accordingly, the scene safety evaluation should be continuously addressed and monitored. If the situation becomes unsafe, personnel must be given as much warning as possible to withdraw.

Crash sites often contain a combination of hazards, including wreckage, hazardous material, fire, and noxious fumes. Depending on the location, season, and time of day, different environmental hazards may also be present, such as those found in urban, marine, mountain, desert, winter, or nighttime settings. Most modern EMS agencies have access to the equipment required to keep personnel safe in all but the most extreme environments. Understanding when to wear the appropriate protective gear minimizes risks to both rescuers and victims.

Personal protective equipment is the foundational safety gear commonly used in most EMS response scenarios. However, each crash site is different in scope and severity, affecting the decision of which gear to wear. For instance, if the crash site spans a large area, as is typical for an aircraft crash, EMS personnel may also require radio communication, fire suppression, construction machinery, and casualty collection transport to provide a safe and effective response.

EMS agencies play a crucial role in ensuring the safety and medical treatment of all personnel at a crash site, including firefighters, law enforcement officers, bystanders, and media personnel. Minimizing the risk of injuries to personnel and bystanders at a crash site prevents time and resources from being focused on the victims.[1]

Triage

Most crash sites are mass casualty incidents with injuries ranging from uninjured to deceased. EMS providers must triage patients quickly and efficiently to help prevent local resources from becoming overwhelmed. A common mistake observed in previous mass casualty incident responses is prioritizing uninjured patients for transport while leaving critically injured individuals untreated in the field.[2]

There is no universally accepted triage system, and triage procedures may vary from hospital to hospital within the same region.[3] Although no evidence indicates that one triage system is superior to another, using multiple triage systems during the same mass casualty incident leads to confusion and disorder, ultimately delaying patient care.[4][5] Each EMS agency must train its respective responders to understand the local triage system and provide a unified response to a mass casualty incident. Although each mass casualty incident differs in scope and available resources, as a general guideline, a triage system includes relevant triage categories and category collection points.

EMS personnel assign mass casualty incident victims to a triage category upon their initial presentation. Each triage protocol may vary in terms of the data used to categorize patients. Category metrics may include the Glasgow Coma Score, vital signs, and visible injuries. This initial assessment efficiently minimizes delay in patients receiving definitive treatment and allows EMS responders to move to the next victim. Triage categories are marked and highly visible for appropriate transportation and patient care. These category designations can be a system of color-coding, numbering, lettering, or transporting the patient to a designated category collection point. As part of their survey and planning, EMS leaders designate collection points accessible from the crash site and for transport to medical facilities. Compounding the challenge of mass casualty incident triage logistics is the potential for a patient's condition to deteriorate as time elapses. Therefore, EMS duties include continuously monitoring patients during triage and transport.

The study of real-world examples shows that without prior training or a unified triage protocol, responders transport patients on a first-come, first-served basis, and critical patients encounter treatment delays. On-scene emergency medical personnel are responsible for administering and maintaining a uniform triage plan for each mass casualty incident and managing the crash site to maximize the survivability of victims.[6]

Prehospital Medical Treatment

EMS personnel are responsible for providing pre-hospital medical care to all crash survivors. As with all other EMS scenarios, medical care begins at the initial encounter and continues throughout the patient's transport to the medical facility. According to the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol, responders treat life-threatening injuries first before transporting the patient from the crash site to a collection point. Less severe injuries are treated at appropriate stages of patient evacuation according to the triage system in place.

Specific to aircraft crash victims, data from the post-crash analysis show that lower extremity fractures are the most common injury of hospitalized aircraft crash survivors. Other frequently reported injuries include head injuries, open wounds, upper extremity fractures, internal organ damage, and burns.[7] Rotary aircraft crash victims have a high potential for spinal column injuries, and it is important to consider c-spine immobilization for transport.[6][8]Trauma victims commonly have multiple distracting injuries. EMS providers are trained to conduct a thorough assessment, determine each patient's injury severity, identify immediate treatment needs, and stabilize patients for transport to definitive care facilities.

Crash Site Investigation

The investigation of a crash scene and the cause of the accident may vary based on the incident. In the case of an aircraft crash, investigators not only examine the events leading up to the crash, which can span several years, but they also examine the immediate aftermath, including eyewitness accounts from EMS first responders on the scene. During the triage process, the deceased are left in their original position, with only minimal movement to perform necessary evaluations. The investigation that follows evaluates the passengers' positions relative to the crash and extrapolates the cause of injury or death. By this same token, investigators may ask EMS responders to recall the location of debris moved or altered to reach potential survivors. The investigations of crash sites have led to improvements in processes, materials, and training, ultimately helping to prevent future loss of life.[9]

Clinical Significance

EMS has several responsibilities, including triage, patient care, and preparing victims for transport. EMS plays a crucial role at the crash site, and when executed properly, this response can maximize the number of lives saved and reduce morbidity.

Review Questions

References

1.
Neely KA. Scene control in prehospital care. Top Emerg Med. 1987 Apr;9(1):79-86. [PubMed: 10281997]
2.
Lee WH, Chiu TF, Ng CJ, Chen JC. Emergency medical preparedness and response to a Singapore airliner crash. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Mar;9(3):194-8. [PubMed: 11874774]
3.
Tinkoff GH, O'Connor RE. Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department. J Trauma. 2002 Jun;52(6):1153-8; discussion 1158-9. [PubMed: 12045646]
4.
Garner A, Lee A, Harrison K, Schultz CH. Comparative analysis of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):541-8. [PubMed: 11679866]
5.
Shah AA, Rehman A, Sayyed RH, Haider AH, Bawa A, Zafar SN, Zia-Ur-Rehman, Ali K, Zafar H. Impact of a predefined hospital mass casualty response plan in a limited resource setting with no pre-hospital care system. Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):156-61. [PubMed: 25225172]
6.
Postma IL, Winkelhagen J, Bijlsma TS, Bloemers FW, Heetveld MJ, Goslings JC. Delayed diagnosis of injury in survivors of the February 2009 crash of flight TK 1951. Injury. 2012 Dec;43(12):2012-7. [PubMed: 22005153]
7.
Baker SP, Brady JE, Shanahan DF, Li G. Aviation-related injury morbidity and mortality: data from U.S. health information systems. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009 Dec;80(12):1001-5. [PMC free article: PMC2810202] [PubMed: 20027845]
8.
Scullion JE, Heys SD, Page G. Pattern of injuries in survivors of a helicopter crash. Injury. 1987 Jan;18(1):13-4. [PubMed: 3440607]
9.
Sahiar F, Garrison R, Lehman LD, Véronneau SJ, Canfield DV. The value of experienced medical personnel during the investigation of general aviation accidents. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002 Sep;73(9):881-5. [PubMed: 12234039]

Disclosure: Stephen Clark declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Rachel Meeks declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK537069PMID: 30725754

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...