Continuing Education Activity

Medial epicondylitis, also known as golfer's or pitcher's elbow, is a tendinopathy involving the medial common flexor origin and arises in both athletic and occupational settings. Medial epicondylitis develops gradually as repetitive wrist flexion and forearm pronation generate microtrauma and degenerative change at the flexor–pronator origin. Patients commonly present with gradual-onset aching pain along the medial elbow, sometimes accompanied by swelling or symptoms of ulnar nerve irritation extending toward the wrist. Although medial epicondylitis may cause significant discomfort and functional limitations at work or in sport, most cases are self-limited and respond to conservative management, including activity modification, individualized physical therapy, and targeted nonoperative modalities. When symptoms persist despite adequate rehabilitation, surgical intervention remains a reliable option, offering favorable patient-reported outcomes with low complication rates.

This course provides participants with a clear understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and evidence-based management of medial epicondylitis. The activity emphasizes thoughtful evaluation strategies, appropriate selection of conservative interventions, and indications for surgical referral. The curriculum also highlights how collaboration with an interprofessional team, such as physical therapists, primary care clinicians, and orthopedic specialists, supports more accurate diagnosis, coordinated treatment planning, and improved patient function. Through integrated perspectives, patient care becomes more efficient, more comprehensive, and better aligned with long-term recovery goals, ultimately enhancing overall clinical outcomes.

Objectives:

• Identify common etiologic and epidemiologic factors associated with medial epicondylitis in athletes and workers.
• Differentiate medial epicondylitis from other causes of medial elbow pain by recognizing its characteristic clinical presentation and using diagnostic tools.
• Develop an evidence-based, stepwise nonoperative and operative management plan, including rehabilitation and return-to-sport guidance. 
• Implement effective interprofessional communication and collaboration to improve understanding of the condition, support accurate diagnostic evaluation, and enhance treatment efficacy and outcomes for patients with medial epicondylitis.

Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction

Medial epicondylitis, also known as golfer's elbow or pitcher's elbow, is a tendinopathy involving the common flexor-pronator origin at the medial epicondyle of the distal humerus. Medial epicondylitis results from repetitive overload of the flexor-pronator musculotendinous unit and is characterized by medial elbow pain, localized tenderness over the common flexor origin, and pain with resisted wrist flexion and forearm pronation.[1]

The medial epicondyle serves as the common origin of the pronator teres, flexor carpi radialis, palmaris longus, and flexor digitorum superficialis, all innervated by the median nerve, and also the humeral head of the flexor carpi ulnaris, which is innervated by the ulnar nerve.[2] The confluence of these muscles forms a common flexor tendon approximately 3 cm long that crosses the medial ulnohumeral joint and lies adjacent and anterior to the ulnar collateral ligament, acting as a dynamic stabilizer against valgus stress.[2][3] Although classically associated with golf and overhead throwing, most cases arise in non-athletes, particularly those engaged in repetitive, forceful gripping and manual labor.[4] The condition is less common and generally more challenging to manage than lateral epicondylitis.[4]

Etiology

Medial epicondylitis is caused by chronic overload and microtrauma of the flexor-pronator origin at the medial epicondyle.[4] Pain at the medial epicondyle may arise from either the common flexor tendon or the ulnar collateral ligament. Both originate from the medial epicondyle, with the common flexor tendon located more anteriorly and the ulnar collateral ligament more posteriorly. Precise localization of tenderness helps distinguish between tendinopathy and ligamentous injury.[2] 

Sports-Related Causes

Repetitive valgus loading and forceful wrist flexion or pronation predispose athletes to medial epicondylitis, including those involved in golf during the backswing and pre-impact phases, overhead throwing such as pitching in the late cocking and acceleration phases, racquet sports like tennis and squash, and activities such as javelin throwing, archery, bowling, weightlifting, and American football where throwing and blocking generate similar stresses. Overhead-throwing athletes may simultaneously sustain ulnar collateral ligament injury due to high valgus loads, and concomitant pathology is common.[4]

Occupational and Environmental Factors

More than 90% of medial epicondylitis cases are non–sports-related, and the condition is strongly associated with repetitive forceful gripping, manual handling of loads greater than 20 kg (44 lb), use of vibrating tools or exposure to elbow vibration, and labor-intensive work such as carpentry, plumbing, construction, and similar trades.[4][5] Additional occupational risk factors include heavy physical work, high repetition, elevated body mass index, smoking, preexisting comorbidities, and psychosocial work stressors.[5]

Systemic and Individual Factors

Tobacco use and type 2 diabetes have been associated with an increased risk of tendinopathy, including medial epicondylitis.[4] Poor conditioning, inadequate flexibility, and improper technique or equipment also contribute to athletic injuries.[6]

Epidemiology

Medial epicondylitis is significantly less common than lateral epicondylitis, accounting for approximately 10% to 20% of all epicondylitis cases.[4] Population-based studies report an overall prevalence of less than 1%, but it may reach 3.8% to 8.2% in high-risk occupational or athletic groups.[4] Medial epicondylitis is less prevalent among individuals with higher educational attainment and does not appear directly related to leisure exercise alone.[5]

Key epidemiologic features show that incidence peaks in middle age, particularly between 45 and 64 years, with the dominant arm affected in roughly 75% of cases and men experiencing the condition more often than women at an approximate 2:1 ratio; higher rates also occur in occupations requiring repetitive, forceful upper-extremity use and in overhead or swinging athletes.[4][7]

Pathophysiology

The primary mechanism of medial epicondylitis is chronic, repetitive eccentric loading of the flexor-pronator musculotendinous unit during wrist and finger flexion, forearm pronation, and valgus stress at the elbow, leading to supraphysiologic forces to create microscopic tendon failure and intratendinous microtears.[4][8] Over time, the tendon develops disorganized collagen with loss of normal parallel alignment, collagen fragmentation, increased mucoid ground substance and non-collagenous matrix, fibroblastic and vascular hyperplasia consistent with angiofibroblastic hyperplasia, and occasionally focal necrosis or calcification.

Historically, medial epicondylitis was believed to be inflammatory (tendinitis), but histopathological studies show that classic inflammatory infiltrates are minimal or absent. The condition is therefore best understood as a degenerative tendinosis rather than an acute inflammatory process.[8]  Additional considerations include the recognition that, although earlier concepts emphasized the pronator teres and flexor carpi radialis as the primary structures involved, newer evidence indicates that most components of the common flexor origin may be affected except for the variably present palmaris longus, and that degeneration within the flexor-pronator mass can diminish its role in providing dynamic valgus stability to the elbow, potentially coexisting with or exacerbating ulnar collateral ligament pathology, particularly in overhead athletes.[4][9] 

History and Physical

Medial epicondylitis typically causes activity-related medial elbow pain that may interfere with work or sport but rarely results in severe disability.[4]

History

Patients commonly report:

• Gradual onset of aching pain over the medial elbow, sometimes following a specific overuse episode
• Pain localized near the medial epicondyle that may radiate into the proximal forearm
• Pain exacerbated by activities involving gripping, wrist flexion, and forearm pronation, such as lifting, turning a doorknob, golf swing, or throwing
• In throwers, pain during the late cocking and early acceleration phase
• Grip weakness, subjective hand or wrist weakness, and stiffness around the elbow
• Intermittent paresthesias of the ring and small fingers when concomitant ulnar neuritis is present.[2] 

Symptoms may begin insidiously or acutely and can be intermittent early in the course, progressing to more persistent pain if untreated.

Physical Examination 

Inspection is often normal in chronic cases. In more acute or severe presentations, localized swelling, warmth, or mild erythema may be present. Key examination findings include the following.

• Point tenderness 5 to 10 mm distal and anterior to the medial epicondyle, along the common flexor tendon origin (often over pronator teres and flexor carpi radialis).
• Pain with resisted wrist flexion and forearm pronation with the elbow extended and forearm supinated—a classic provocative maneuver.
• Pain with passive wrist extension and forearm supination (stretching the flexor-pronator origin).
• Range of motion: Typically full early; chronic cases may show limited terminal elbow extension, mild flexion contracture, and guarding with terminal wrist extension.
• Throwing-specific tests: A positive bounce test (reproduction of symptoms when the elbow is quickly taken from flexion to full extension under valgus stress) can be observed in throwers and suggests associated pathology.[2][8][2]

Because ulnar neuropathy is a common concomitant condition (approximately 20% of patients), a careful ulnar nerve examination is essential. Key components include:

• Tinel sign at the cubital tunnel
• Two-point discrimination in the ulnar distribution
• Assessment of hypothenar eminence bulk and intrinsic muscle strength
• Froment sign in advanced cases, indicating intrinsic weakness [2]

Valgus stability should be assessed with valgus stress testing and the moving valgus stress test to evaluate for ulnar collateral ligament injury, particularly in throwers.[9]

Evaluation

The diagnosis of medial epicondylitis is primarily clinical, based on a compatible history and physical examination. Imaging and ancillary studies are used to confirm the diagnosis, evaluate severity, and identify associated pathologies, such as ulnar collateral ligament injury or ulnar neuritis.[4][8] 

Plain Radiographs

Standard anterior to posterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow are recommended primarily to exclude other pathology, as most radiographs appear normal in early or mild disease. However, up to 25% may demonstrate calcification at the common flexor tendon or ulnar collateral ligament, particularly in chronic cases or throwing athletes.[10][11]  Additional findings, such as sclerotic changes at the medial epicondyle, osteophytes, or loose bodies, may be observed in chronic overuse or arthritic conditions. Lateral views are useful for ruling out a medial epicondyle fracture, posttraumatic deformity, and osteoarthritis.[8]

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred advanced imaging modality for medial epicondylitis and related pathology, particularly in athletes, as T2-weighted and STIR sequences demonstrate intermediate-to-high signal intensity at the common flexor tendon origin consistent with edema, tendinosis, or partial tearing. MRI distinguishes isolated flexor-pronator tendinopathy from ulnar collateral ligament sprain or tear, osteochondral lesions, and intra-articular loose bodies, and provides essential detail for surgical planning in refractory cases and in high-demand throwers, where precise assessment of ulnar collateral ligament involvement is critical.[4][9]

Ultrasonography

Musculoskeletal ultrasound is an accessible, dynamic, and cost-effective imaging modality that allows visualization of tendon thickening, hypoechoic regions, and neovascularization consistent with tendinosis, while also identifying partial tears, calcifications, and adjacent soft-tissue pathology, and enabling dynamic assessment of tendon motion and ulnar collateral ligament stability. However, operator-dependent ultrasound can achieve sensitivities and specificities above 90% for tendinopathy in experienced hands.[2][4] Other studies, such as bone scans and computed tomography, are rarely required but may help evaluate alternative diagnoses such as stress fractures or complex bony deformity, and electrodiagnostic studies, including nerve conduction studies and electromyogram, are appropriate when significant ulnar neuropathy is suspected or when differentiation from cervical radiculopathy or more proximal neuropathies is needed.[2][4]

Treatment / Management

More than 90% of patients improve with nonoperative treatment. Surgery is reserved for persistent, function-limiting symptoms despite an adequate course of conservative care.[12] 

Nonoperative Management

Nonoperative management should be individualized according to symptom severity, functional demands, and patient comorbidities, beginning with activity modification, in which avoidance or reduction of repetitive gripping, forceful wrist flexion or pronation, heavy lifting, and high-velocity throwing is essential in the acute phase, often requiring temporary work adjustments or sport restriction.[8] Bracing options such as a counterforce forearm strap placed just distal to the elbow can reduce load transmission to the common flexor origin, while night splinting with a neutral or slightly extended wrist position may lessen nocturnal pain and ongoing microtrauma.[8] Physical therapy remains central and progresses in phases, beginning with pain control through ice, relative rest, gentle active and passive range-of-motion exercises, and soft-tissue mobilization of the flexor-pronator mass. The program then advances to strengthening, emphasizing eccentric loading of the wrist flexors and pronators, which is particularly effective for chronic tendinopathy, and is supplemented by isometric and isotonic exercises. Proximal kinetic-chain strengthening for the shoulder and scapulothoracic stabilizers is also incorporated, which is especially important for throwers.[4][8][13][14] Functional progression includes return-to-sport drills, technique correction, and workload monitoring. Pharmacological options such as acetaminophen and short nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug courses may ease pain, though the underlying pathology is degenerative, and opioids are not recommended.[4][8]

Injection therapies are generally used after adequate trials of activity modification and rehabilitation, with corticosteroid injections offering short-term relief of less than 6 to 8 weeks but lacking durable benefit and sometimes correlating with higher recurrence rates.[8][15] Platelet-rich plasma has become a popular biological option that may enhance tendon healing and, according to systematic reviews, can provide short- to mid-term outcomes comparable to surgery for refractory cases, though study heterogeneity remains high.[15] Dry needling, or percutaneous needle fenestration, seeks to disrupt degenerative tissue and stimulate healing, and may outperform corticosteroids in some chronic tendinopathies. In contrast, ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy systems offer a minimally invasive option before considering open surgery.[16][17] Other biological or injection-based modalities, such as prolotherapy or botulinum toxin, remain experimental with mixed results.[16] Adjunctive electrophysical treatments include extracorporeal shockwave therapy, which may help in tendinopathy lasting more than 6 months by promoting regeneration and reducing calcification. At the same time, therapeutic ultrasound, iontophoresis, phonophoresis, and electrical stimulation may provide short-term symptom relief but lack consistent evidence of lasting benefit.[8][13][17]

Operative Management

Operative management is reserved for patients whose symptoms continue to significantly impair function and quality of life despite 3 to 6 months of appropriate nonoperative care, with timing and expectations requiring careful discussion in high-demand athletes.[18][19] Open debridement with partial release or repair of the common flexor origin remains the traditional gold standard for recalcitrant medial epicondylitis. The procedure involved exposure of the common flexor origin, removal of degenerative tissue, and either tendon release with debridement or anatomic repair to the medial epicondyle using suture anchors or double-row techniques, sometimes supplemented by microfracture to promote healing.[1][20] Clinical series show substantial improvements in pain, function, and strength, with Mayo Elbow Performance Scores rising from 50s to 60s preoperatively to the high 80s to 90s afterward.[12]

Arthroscopic and percutaneous approaches offer alternatives to open surgery, providing reduced soft-tissue dissection, the ability to treat concomitant intra-articular pathology, and comparable improvements in pain and function in appropriately selected patients.[1] Comparative studies indicate that arthroscopic debridement can achieve outcomes similar to those of open procedures, with low complication rates. However, technical expertise is essential, and meticulous protection of the ulnar and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves is required.[18][19] When significant ulnar neuritis or cubital tunnel syndrome coexists, decompression with or without anterior transposition may be performed at the same time, which may slightly increase complication rates but is often necessary in advanced cases.[2]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for medial elbow pain is broad. Careful history-taking, physical examination, and targeted imaging and electrodiagnostic testing help differentiate these conditions.[2][8] Differential diagnosis for medial epicondylitis includes:

Neuropathic

• C6 or C7 cervical radiculopathy
• Cubital tunnel syndrome (ulnar neuropathy at the elbow)
• Ulnar neuritis or tardy ulnar nerve palsy
• Median neuropathy or anterior interosseous nerve entrapment

Ligamentous and instability

• Ulnar collateral ligament (medial collateral ligament) sprain, partial tear, or insufficiency
• Valgus extension overload syndrome in throwers

Intra-articular

• Elbow osteoarthritis
• Arthrofibrosis or adhesive capsulitis-like stiffness
• Loose bodies or osteochondral lesions

Osseous

• Medial epicondyle avulsion fracture (especially in skeletally immature athletes)
• Olecranon fracture with valgus instability patterns
• Osteophytes, particularly in valgus extension overload

Myofascial and tendinous

• Flexor or pronator muscle strain
• Lateral epicondylitis (referred pain or concomitant pathology)
• Triceps tendonitis

Other

• Synovitis (inflammatory arthropathy)
• Infection (septic arthritis, osteomyelitis)
• Dermatologic conditions (eg, herpes zoster) over the medial elbow region

Prognosis

The overall prognosis for medial epicondylitis is favorable. Most patients can return to their prior work or sport levels with appropriate conservative treatment and rehabilitation.[14] Long-term recurrent symptoms are possible, particularly if risk factors are not mitigated or if a rapid return to high-demand activity is unsupported by adequate conditioning. Key prognostic considerations include the following:

Response to Conservative Care

The majority of patients improve with activity modification, bracing, and structured physical therapy. Recurrences can occur, particularly if risk factors are not addressed.

Patient-Related Factors

Higher body mass index (>30) and older age (>65 years) are associated with an increased risk of injection failure and subsequent need for surgery. 

Occupational Demands

Patients in high-repetition, high-load occupations may require work modification and more prolonged rehabilitation.

Athletic Demands

Overhead athletes, especially pitchers, may have more prolonged recovery and require meticulous attention to throwing mechanics and workload.

Surgical Outcomes

Operative treatment for recalcitrant cases yields high rates of pain relief, functional improvement, and return to work/sport, with relatively low complication rates when appropriate rehabilitation is provided.[1][18] 

Complications

Complications may arise from the disease itself or from its treatment.[2][8] Systematic reviews report overall surgical complication rates of approximately 3% to 4.3%, increasing toward 11% when ulnar nerve transposition is performed concurrently.[21]

Disease-Related Complications 

• Persistent or recurrent medial elbow pain
• Ulnar neuropathy or cubital tunnel syndrome
• Ulnar collateral ligament injury or instability, especially in throwers
• Coexisting conditions such as lateral epicondylitis, rotator cuff tendinopathy, or carpal tunnel syndrome due to overlapping risk factors

Nonoperative Treatment–Related Complications 

• Skin irritation or discomfort from bracing or taping
• Local depigmentation or subcutaneous atrophy after corticosteroid injection
• Transient symptom flare after injection or extracorporeal shockwave therapy

Operative Treatment–Related Complications 

• Persistent or recurrent symptoms despite surgery
• Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve neuropathy (numbness or dysesthesia over the medial forearm)
• Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury or transient ulnar neuropathy
• Infection, hematoma, or wound healing problems
• Incomplete symptom relief or stiffness

Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care

All patients, particularly overhead athletes, benefit from comprehensive kinetic-chain rehabilitation that includes strengthening of the scapula, rotator cuff, and core. Postoperative protocols vary by surgeon and technique, but typical elements include a brief period of immobilization, typically 1 to 2 weeks in a posterior splint or brace to protect the repair, followed by early initiation of gentle, active-assisted elbow and wrist range of motion after splint removal to minimize stiffness. Progressive strengthening generally begins around 6 weeks postoperatively, emphasizing concentric and then eccentric strengthening of the flexor-pronator mass, with a gradual return to occupational and sport-specific activities between 3 and 6 months, based on healing, strength, and symptom resolution.[4]

Deterrence and Patient Education

No definitive, evidence-based primary prevention guidelines exist for medial epicondylitis. However, patients should be educated that medial epicondylitis is typically a chronic overuse condition, improvement can be gradual over weeks to months, and adherence to therapy and activity modification is essential for durable recovery. Several strategies may reduce risk and recurrence.

Workplace Modifications

• Limiting repetitive forceful gripping and heavy lifting when possible
• Use of ergonomic tools and vibration-dampening equipment
• Scheduled rest breaks and task rotation in high-risk occupations 

Athletic Considerations

• Proper technique, coaching, and equipment, such as racquet grip size or golf club fit
• Gradual training progression and avoidance of sudden increases in volume or intensity
• Comprehensive conditioning programs emphasizing flexibility and strength of the shoulder girdle, core, and forearm musculature

Recurrence Prevention

• Continued home exercise programs focusing on eccentric strengthening and stretching after symptom resolution
• Timely attention to early recurrence of pain, with temporary activity modification rather than playing through significant pain
• Counseling on smoking cessation and weight management, given their associations with tendinopathy [4][8]

Pearls and Other Issues

Key facts about medial epicondylitis include:

Degenerative Nature

Medial epicondylitis is primarily a degenerative tendinosis rather than an inflammatory condition. This distinction explains the limited role of anti-inflammatory medications and underscores the importance of mechanical loading and structured rehabilitation.

Concomitant Pathology

Evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament and ulnar nerve is essential, particularly in throwers, as associated pathology is common and can alter management.

Ultrasound Utility

Musculoskeletal ultrasound is an effective office-based tool for confirming tendinosis, identifying partial tears or calcifications, and guiding injections or percutaneous tenotomy.

Injection Therapies

Corticosteroid injections can provide short-term pain relief but should be used cautiously due to questionable long-term benefit and potential tendon weakening.

Emerging Interventions

Platelet-rich plasma and dry needling or percutaneous tenotomy are increasingly used for chronic cases, with evidence still evolving.

Surgical Management

Surgical debridement and repair reliably improve pain and function in refractory cases. Complication rates are relatively low when patients are appropriately selected and rehabilitation is optimized.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Management of medial epicondylitis benefits from coordinated interprofessional care. Clear communication among team members regarding diagnosis, treatment expectations, rehabilitation progression, and return-to-work or return-to-sport timelines improves outcomes and enhances patient satisfaction. Shared decision-making, particularly when injections or surgery are being considered, ensures that treatment planning appropriately reflects patient goals, occupational demands, and sports participation requirements.[4][8]

Primary care clinicians and emergency clinicians often provide the initial evaluation, initiate early conservative therapy, and identify patients whose persistent or atypical symptoms warrant referral. Sports medicine clinicians and orthopedic surgeons confirm the diagnosis, evaluate for associated ulnar collateral ligament or ulnar nerve pathology, interpret advanced imaging, and oversee nonoperative and operative treatment strategies. Rehabilitation is guided by physical and occupational therapy, incorporating eccentric strengthening, kinetic-chain conditioning, and task-specific retraining to restore function. Imaging accuracy and procedural support are enhanced through musculoskeletal radiology, which ensures optimized ultrasound and MRI evaluation and provides image-guided interventions when appropriate. Nurses and athletic trainers reinforce patient education on bracing, splint use, medication adherence, and home exercise compliance while monitoring progress and readiness for return to activity. Medication selection, monitoring for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug–related adverse effects, and counseling on safe use and tapering are further supported by pharmacy services, contributing to a coordinated, interprofessional approach that improves outcomes for individuals with medial epicondylitis.

Review Questions

• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
• Click here for a simplified version.
• Comment on this article.

References

1.

Arevalo A, Rao S, Willier DP, Schrock CI, Erickson BJ, Jack RA, Cohen SB, Ciccotti MG. Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes for Medial Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(9):2506-2515. [PubMed: 35658623]

2.

Alrabaa RG, Dantzker N, Ahmad CS. Injuries and Conditions Affecting the Elbow Flexor/Pronator Tendons. Clin Sports Med. 2020 Jul;39(3):549-563. [PubMed: 32446574]

3.

Lin F, Kohli N, Perlmutter S, Lim D, Nuber GW, Makhsous M. Muscle contribution to elbow joint valgus stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):795-802. [PubMed: 17936028]

4.

Amin NH, Kumar NS, Schickendantz MS. Medial epicondylitis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Jun;23(6):348-55. [PubMed: 26001427]

5.

Shiri R, Viikari-Juntura E, Varonen H, Heliövaara M. Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Dec 01;164(11):1065-74. [PubMed: 16968862]

6.

Plancher KD, Halbrecht J, Lourie GM. Medial and lateral epicondylitis in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 1996 Apr;15(2):283-305. [PubMed: 8726318]

7.

Wu VJ, Thon S, Finley Z, Bohlen H, Schwartz Z, O'Brien MJ, Savoie FH. Double-Row Repair for Recalcitrant Medial Epicondylitis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;7(12):2325967119885608. [PMC free article: PMC6928541] [PubMed: 31903395]

8.

Konarski W, Poboży T, Poboży K, Domańska J, Konarska K. Current concepts of natural course and in management of medial epicondylitis: a clinical overview. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023;15:84275. [PMC free article: PMC10495044] [PubMed: 37701778]

9.

Kheterpal AB, Bredella MA. Overuse Injuries of the Elbow. Radiol Clin North Am. 2019 Sep;57(5):931-942. [PubMed: 31351542]

10.

Ciccotti MG, Ramani MN. Medial epicondylitis. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2003 Dec;7(4):190-6. [PubMed: 16518220]

11.

Kane SF, Lynch JH, Taylor JC. Evaluation of elbow pain in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2014 Apr 15;89(8):649-57. [PubMed: 24784124]

12.

Vinod AV, Ross G. An effective approach to diagnosis and surgical repair of refractory medial epicondylitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Aug;24(8):1172-7. [PubMed: 26189803]

13.

Hoogvliet P, Randsdorp MS, Dingemanse R, Koes BW, Huisstede BM. Does effectiveness of exercise therapy and mobilisation techniques offer guidance for the treatment of lateral and medial epicondylitis? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;47(17):1112-9. [PubMed: 23709519]

14.

Clifford C, Challoumas D, Paul L, Syme G, Millar NL. Effectiveness of isometric exercise in the management of tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020;6(1):e000760. [PMC free article: PMC7406028] [PubMed: 32818059]

15.

Tarpada SP, Morris MT, Lian J, Rashidi S. Current advances in the treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis. J Orthop. 2018 Mar;15(1):107-110. [PMC free article: PMC5895908] [PubMed: 29657450]

16.

Sousa Filho LF, Barbosa Santos MM, Dos Santos GHF, da Silva Júnior WM. Corticosteroid injection or dry needling for musculoskeletal pain and disability? A systematic review and GRADE evidence synthesis. Chiropr Man Therap. 2021 Dec 02;29(1):49. [PMC free article: PMC8638538] [PubMed: 34857021]

17.

Dingemanse R, Randsdorp M, Koes BW, Huisstede BM. Evidence for the effectiveness of electrophysical modalities for treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;48(12):957-65. [PubMed: 23335238]

18.

Rippke JN, Burkhart KJ. [Epicondylosis : Open surgical procedure-when and how for lateral and medial epicondylitis?]. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 May;52(5):394-403. [PubMed: 37074370]

19.

Kim BS, Jung KJ, Lee C. Open procedure vs. arthroscopic débridement for chronic medial epicondylitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Feb;32(2):340-347. [PubMed: 36279988]

20.

Alrabaa RG, Sonnenfeld J, Trofa D, Ahmad C. Elbow Common Flexor Tendon Repair Technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Nov;8(11):e1367-e1371. [PMC free article: PMC6926370] [PubMed: 31890509]

21.

Barakat A, Jha G, Raval P, Abourisha E, Divall P, Singh HP, Pandey R. Systematic review of surgical techniques for medial epicondylitis: evaluating the impact of preoperative injections and concomitant ulnar neuritis on postoperative outcomes. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Sep;107(7):457-468. [PMC free article: PMC12400455] [PubMed: 40131732]

Disclosure: Daniel Li declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Ahmad Hammad declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Kimberly Kaiser declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.