NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
On May 28-29, 2008, AHRQ hosted a working meeting to discuss particularly challenging methodological issues in assessing medical tests. This working meeting included a group of investigators from the Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs), other experts in government, industry, and academia and also marked the launch of a Medical Test Evaluation Work Group within the EPC program. This Work Group was charged with developing guidance for conducting comparative effectiveness reviews of medical test technologies for the AHRQ Effective Health Care Program. A series of scientific publications (white papers) were commissioned for the meeting. These white papers have been published in Medical Decision Making and were intended to serve as background papers for the Work Group, which is expected to complete their draft guidance in the first part of 2010.
Contents
- Decision-Analytic Modeling to Evaluate Benefits and Harms of Medical Tests—Uses and LimitationsThomas A Trikalinos, MD, Uwe Siebert, MD, MPH, MSc, ScD, and Joseph Lau, MD.Published: November 9, 2009.
- Using the Principles of Randomized Controlled Trial Design To Guide Test EvaluationSarah J Lord, MBBS, MS, Les Irwig, MBBCh, PhD, and Patrick MM Bossuyt, PhD.Published: November 9, 2009.
- Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical TestsJeroen G Lijmer, MD, PhD, Mariska Leeflang, PhD, and Patrick MM Bossuyt, PhD.Published: November 9, 2009.
- Additional Patient Outcomes and Pathways in Evaluations of TestingPatrick MM Bossuyt, PhD and Kirsten McCaffery, PhD.Published: November 9, 2009.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews[ 2012]Review Methods Guide for Medical Test ReviewsChang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA. 2012 Jun
- Review Understanding Health-Systems' Use of and Need for Evidence To Inform Decisionmaking[ 2017]Review Understanding Health-Systems' Use of and Need for Evidence To Inform DecisionmakingWhite CM, Sanders Schmidler GD, Butler M, Wang Z, Robinson K, Mitchell MD, Berkman N, Henderson J, Fiordalisi C, Hartling L, et al. 2017 Oct
- Review Prioritization Criteria Methodology for Future Research Needs Proposals Within the Effective Health Care Program: PiCMe-Prioritization Criteria Methods[ 2013]Review Prioritization Criteria Methodology for Future Research Needs Proposals Within the Effective Health Care Program: PiCMe-Prioritization Criteria MethodsAndrews J. 2013 Jan
- Review Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update.[Methods Guide for Effectivenes...]Review Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update.Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari M, McDonagh M, Balk E, Whitlock E, Reston J, Bass E, Butler M, Gartlehner G, et al. Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. 2008
- Review Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions.[Methods Guide for Effectivenes...]Review Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions.Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, Chang S, Hartling L, McPheeters M, Santaguida PL, Shamliyan T, Singh K, Tsertsvadze A, et al. Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. 2008
- Medical Tests-White Paper SeriesMedical Tests-White Paper Series
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...