Regional analgesia – establishing regional analgesia in labour (intrathecal opioids versus epidural local anaesthetics)

Bibliographic reference Study type Evidence level Number of women Women’s characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of follow-up Outcome measures Effect size Source of funding Additional comments
Bucklin BA;Chestnut DH;Hawkins JL; 2002 Jan212Systemati c review - meta- analysisEvidence level: 1+7 trialswomen in labour requiring analgesiaIntervention: intrathecal opioidsComparison: epidural local anaestheticsFollow-up period: intrapartumOutcome Measures: analgesia, mode of birth, adverse eventsspontaneous vaginal birth
RR 1.10 [0.34 to 1.85]

RR 14.10 [13.39 to 14.80]

RR 0.94 [0.01 to 1.88]
not stated

From: Evidence tables

Cover of Intrapartum Care
Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth.
NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 55.
National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK).
London: RCOG Press; 2007 Sep.
Copyright © 2007, National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health.

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the publisher or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK []. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to the publisher at the UK address printed on this page.

The use of registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant laws and regulations and therefore for general use.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.