NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Excerpt
This Addendum to the Third Edition of the Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide was performed under a contract from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) with the purpose of presenting new, emerging themes related to designing and conducting registries. First published in 2007, the User’s Guide, with translations available in Chinese and Korean, serves as a reference for planning, developing, maintaining, and evaluating registries developed to collect data about patient outcomes. The second (2010) and third (2014) editions incorporated updates to existing topics and included new chapters on methodological and technological advances in registry science.
We are pleased to present 5 new chapters that address emerging topics in registries, including increasing the focus on patients in registries including engaging with patients throughout the design and conduct of registries, methodological considerations for using digital health technologies, designing patient-centric studies, and building registry networks.
Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Preface
- 1. The Increasing Focus on the Patient in Patient RegistriesSarah E. Daugherty; Sara B. Lee; Ben Nowell; Holly Peay; Dan Solomon; Tanika Gray Valbrun; Priscilla Velentgas; Danielle Whicher.
- 2. Engaging Patients as Partners Throughout the Registry Life CycleNancy Santanello; Joan Largent; Evan Myers; Jaye Bea Smalley.
- 3. Digital Health and Patient Registries: Today, Tomorrow, and the FutureJennifer Christian; Nabarun Dasgupta; Melissa Jordan; Maneesh Juneja; Wendy Nilsen; John Reites.
- Introduction
- The Rise of Digital Health
- Utilization of Digital Health in Clinical Research
- Examples of Digital Health Uses in Global Patient Registries
- Advantages of Using Digital Health in Patient Registries
- Current Limitations and Challenges To Using Digital Health in Patient Registries
- A Look at the Future of Digital Health
- Conclusion
- Digital Health Approach Worksheet
- References for Chapter 3
- 4. Direct-to-Patient Registry and Other Patient-Centric DesignsNancy Dreyer; Patricia Franklin; Kevin Haynes; Paul Mehta; Mary Beth Ritchey.
- 5. Registry NetworksSeth Blumenthal; Kathleen Blake; Christina Mack; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Caleb Stowell.
- List of Reviewers
Suggested citation:
Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Leavy MB, Christian JB (eds). 21st Century Patient Registries. EBook addendum to Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide, 3rd Edition. (Prepared by L&M Policy Research, LLC under Contract No. 290-2014-00004-C.) AHRQ Publication No. 17(18)-EHC013-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; March 2018. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov.
The Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) conducts and supports research focused on the outcomes, effectiveness, comparative clinical effectiveness, and appropriateness of pharmaceuticals, devices, and health care services. More information on the Effective Health Care Program can be found at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov.
This report is based on research conducted by the L&M Policy Research, LLC, and partners OM1 and IQVIA, under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2014-00004-C). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), its board of Governors, or Methodology Committee.
None of the authors have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report.
This report may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials that are clearly noted in the report. Further reproduction of those copyrighted materials is prohibited without the express permission of copyright holders.
- 1
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; www
.ahrq.gov
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- [How to read and understand Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide (2nd Edition)].[Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2013][How to read and understand Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide (2nd Edition)].Yang W, Xie YM, agency for healthcare research and quality. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2013 Sep; 38(18):2958-62.
- Review Multinational Registries: Challenges and Opportunities: Addendum to Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide, Third Edition[ 2018]Review Multinational Registries: Challenges and Opportunities: Addendum to Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide, Third EditionLeavy MB. 2018 Feb
- Recent Trends in Patient Registries for Health Services Research.[Methods Inf Med. 2021]Recent Trends in Patient Registries for Health Services Research.Stausberg J, Harkener S, Semler SC. Methods Inf Med. 2021 Jun; 60(S 01):e1-e8. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
- Evaluation of the New North Carolina Burn Registry.[J Burn Care Res. 2017]Evaluation of the New North Carolina Burn Registry.Chrisco L, Travers D, Grant EJ. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jul/Aug; 38(4):e765-e771.
- Review Managing Missing Data in Patient Registries: Addendum to Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide, Third Edition[ 2018]Review Managing Missing Data in Patient Registries: Addendum to Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide, Third EditionMack C, Su Z, Westreich D. 2018 Feb
- 21st Century Patient Registries21st Century Patient Registries
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...