NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
What foods should Americans eat to promote their health, and in what amounts? What is the scientific evidence that supports specific recommendations for dietary intake to reduce the risk of multifactorial chronic disease? These questions are critically important because dietary intake has been recognized to have a role as a key determinant of health.
As the primary federal source of consistent, evidence-based information on dietary practices for optimal nutrition, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) have the promise to empower Americans to make informed decisions about what and how much they eat to improve health and reduce the risk of chronic disease. The adoption and widespread translation of the DGA requires that they be universally viewed as valid, evidence-based, and free of bias and conflicts of interest to the extent possible. However, this has not routinely been the case.
A first short report meant to inform the 2020 review cycle explored how the advisory committee selection process can be improved to provide more transparency, eliminate bias, and include committee members with a range of viewpoints. This second and final report recommends changes to the DGA process to reduce and manage sources of bias and conflicts of interest, improve timely opportunities for engagement by all interested parties, enhance transparency, and strengthen the science base of the process.
Contents
- The National Academies of SCIENCES • ENGINEERING • MEDICINE
- COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE PROCESS TO UPDATE THE DIETARY GUIDELINES FOR AMERICANS
- Reviewers
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Summary
- 1. Introduction
- Part I
- Part II
- 5. Current Process for Developing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: Key Findings
- 6. Current Approaches to Examining the Evidence: Key Findings
- OVERVIEW OF THE TYPES OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND ANALYSES USED BY THE DGAC
- ASSESSMENT OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEW METHODS
- ASSESSMENT OF THE NEL PROCESS FOR UPDATING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
- ASSESSMENT OF THE NEL PROCESS FOR USING EXISTING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, META-ANALYSES, AND REPORTS
- EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGY AND USE OF FOOD PATTERN MODELING
- DESCRIPTIVE DATA ANALYSES: EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGY AND USE
- QUALITY OF DIETARY DATA ACROSS ALL TYPES OF EVIDENCE
- CONCLUSION
- REFERENCES
- 7. Recent Approaches to Assessing Nutritional Adequacy and Exploring Chronic Disease
- APPENDIXES
- Appendix A. Glossary
- Appendix B. Public Workshop Agenda and Comments
- Appendix C. DGAC Topics and Questions
- Appendix D. Dietary Guidelines for Americans Guidelines and Key Recommendations
- Appendix E. Additional Information About the Dietary Reference Intakes
- Appendix F. Committee Member and Staff Biographies
- Appendix G. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
Suggested citation:
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Redesigning the process for establishing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/24883.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Optimizing the Process for Establishing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: The Selection Process[ 2017]Review Optimizing the Process for Establishing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: The Selection ProcessNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Food and Nutrition Board, Committee to Review the Process to Update the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 2017 Nov 16
- Review Perspective: Impact of the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Report on the Process for the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee.[Adv Nutr. 2021]Review Perspective: Impact of the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Report on the Process for the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee.Schneeman BO, Ard JD, Boushey CJ, Bailey RL, Novotny R, Snetselaar LG, de Jesus JM, Stoody EE. Adv Nutr. 2021 Jul 30; 12(4):1051-1057.
- American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.[J Clin Oncol. 2003]American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15; 21(12):2377-86. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
- [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008][Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7:S225-46. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
- Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.[Eur J Health Econ. 2008]Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1:5-29.
- Redesigning the Process for Establishing the Dietary Guidelines for AmericansRedesigning the Process for Establishing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...