Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is documented to be associated with several precancerous lesions (CIN, VIN and VaIN), cancer and genital warts. In this economic evaluation, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of administering a catch-up vaccine to females aged 26 years or younger in addition to the current practice of vaccinating 12 year-old- girls compared to maintaining the current practice.
Currently, two vaccines are available in the Norwegian market with documented effect against HPV-infection: the quadrivalent vaccine, directed at HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18, and the bivalent vaccine, directed at HPV 16 and 18. In this report, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of the quadrivalent vaccine for the target population. The cost-effectiveness of the bivalent vaccine is nevertheless discussed in one of the scenario analyses we conducted.
The main results of the evaluation are the following:
- From a public health budget perspective and given the current public price of NOK 1 010.9/dose of the quadrivalent vaccine, introducing a catch-up vaccine for the target population is cost-effective if one is willing to pay NOK 578 391 for a gained quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
- For a willingness-to-pay of NOK 578 391/QALY and from a public health budget perspective, the bivalent vaccine may be considered cost-effective if its price is no higher than approximately NOK 780/dose.
- From a societal perspective, i.e. when costs to patients for time used under treatment and the work-related productivity costs due to disease are included, the catch-up vaccine is cost-effective if one is willing to pay NOK 553 691 per gained QALY.
Preliminary version: HTML in process
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Cost-Effectiveness of HPV-Vaccination of Boys Aged 12 in a Norwegian Setting[ 2015]Review Cost-Effectiveness of HPV-Vaccination of Boys Aged 12 in a Norwegian SettingJiménez E, Torkilseng EB, Klemp M. 2015 Jan
- Comparative cost-effectiveness of the quadrivalent and bivalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a transmission-dynamic modeling study.[Vaccine. 2013]Comparative cost-effectiveness of the quadrivalent and bivalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a transmission-dynamic modeling study.Brisson M, Laprise JF, Drolet M, Van de Velde N, Franco EL, Kliewer EV, Ogilvie G, Deeks SL, Boily MC. Vaccine. 2013 Aug 20; 31(37):3863-71. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
- Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Germany.[Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017]Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Germany.Damm O, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Kretzschmar MEE, Kaufmann AM, Deleré Y, Ultsch B, Wichmann O, Krämer A, Greiner W. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017; 15:18. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
- Potential cost-effectiveness of the nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.[Int J Cancer. 2014]Potential cost-effectiveness of the nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.Drolet M, Laprise JF, Boily MC, Franco EL, Brisson M. Int J Cancer. 2014 May 1; 134(9):2264-8. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
- Review Cost-Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination in Norway[ 2007]Review Cost-Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination in NorwayKlemp Gjertsen M, Neilson AR, Freiesleben de Blasio B. 2007
- Cost-Effectiveness of a HPV-Vaccination Catch-Up Program for Females Aged 26 Yea...Cost-Effectiveness of a HPV-Vaccination Catch-Up Program for Females Aged 26 Years or Younger in a Norwegian Setting
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...