NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Anaya JM, Shoenfeld Y, Rojas-Villarraga A, et al., editors. Autoimmunity: From Bench to Bedside [Internet]. Bogota (Colombia): El Rosario University Press; 2013 Jul 18.
Introduction
Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are chronic complex inflammatory diseases. They are considered to be either specific or systemic and characterized by inducing immune humoral (B cell) or cell (T cells) responses. Although their etiology is unknown, they are well known to have environmental and polygenic components that are involved in defining susceptibility or protection. Thus, the sum of the genes involved in ADs makes up the genetic component that defines them. ADs are presented with a multifactorial genetic inheritance pattern which does not completely follow a classical Mendelian model.
Furthermore, studies in monozygotic and dizygotic twins have estimated the relative contribution of genetic effects as seen in Table 1 (1). Among the most relevant and studied genetic factors for ADs are genes located in the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) and, in particular, loci from Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I and class II. An extensive list of ADs has been associated with different variants of the HLA genes, particularly, class II genes (2). Note that the set of alleles associated with various ADs may vary from one population to another, and within the same population, different alleles might be associated with different ADs. Moreover, the genetic effect of HLA might also be involved in changing and defining the relationship between the environmental factors associated with ADs.
Table 1
Concordance rates in monozygotic and dizygotic twins in various ADs.
Genetic mapping of the MHC has identified multiple genes as shown in chapter 10. Advances in molecular techniques, based on the genetic sequence and conformation of the different epitopes of HLA molecules and genes that encode them, have enabled the development of molecular and functional analysis. Together with genetic and molecular epidemiology, they have made it possible to establish and hypothesize the plausible mechanisms of association between HLA genetic variants and the pathophysiology of ADs, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), multiple sclerosis (MS), celiac disease (CD), Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), etc., or HLA and autoinflammatory diseases such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, the molecular mechanisms associated with these diseases are not fully resolved. The struggle in identifying genes presenting a primary and secondary association as well as the high linkage disequilibrium (LD) observed throughout the whole MHC region coupled with the interaction of these molecules with infectious agents and/or allergens and other environmental factors has hampered the definition of these mechanisms.
The association hypothesis has been substantiated in: 1) the susceptibility or protection that may result from the combination of several molecules encoded by several HLA (class I and/or class II) or non-HLA (TAP1 and TAP2) loci in the MHC region (3), 2) the different functions of the immune response and the processing and presentation of antigens (4), and 3) the distinction between self and non-self, and the activation of autoreactive T cells (3,4). Likewise, it has been thought that some peptide sequences that originated from infectious organisms (i.e., viral or bacterial) might present high similarity to peptides generated from self-proteins. The former would engender the chance of an immune response (i.e., molecular mimicry) leading to the presentation of these self-proteins in the context of HLA molecules despite their different origins (5).
Epidemiological analysis
Evaluation of the role of the HLA molecules and alleles in susceptibility or protection against any disease, particularly ADs, is a key component in the definition of the population at risk. Therefore, conventional epidemiological analysis of age, sex, ethnicity, and geographical origin might elucidate multiple environmental factors associated with these diseases. Furthermore, these variables should go hand in hand with molecular epidemiology which seeks to understand the genetic distribution in a population and its correlation with the distribution of the disease and associated alleles.
Molecular epidemiology is based on the study of homogeneous populations. The preferred groups are those that are genetically and geographically isolated such as indigenous communities, which make it possible to identify polymorphisms, new alleles, new sequences, extended haplotypes and determine the genetic and functional expression of HLA molecules in these populations. In addition, molecular epidemiology allows us to evaluate the natural dynamic of the population and frame it in a system which generates data such as the Hardy Weinberg proportions, genetic drift, inbreeding, and positive/negative selection for certain alleles (Box 1) (6). All these factors can lead to different patterns of association with the disease or the functional behavior of antigen presentation and immune response affected in pathologies such as ADs.
Box 1
Complotype Describes haplotypical combinations of genetic variants of the MHC-linked complement genes.
Molecular interaction: MHC-peptides and autoimmune diseases
Given the characteristics of the interaction of peptides with the MHC molecules reviewed in chapter 10, it is clear that many efforts to explain the molecular association of these alleles with ADs are focused on the identification of autoantigens and HLA molecules that present them as will be reviewed below.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
Relevant HLA genes involved in susceptibility to RA are HLA-DRB1*04:01, *04:04, and *04:08 in Caucasians; HLA-DRB1*04:05 in Spaniards and Japanese; HLA-DRB1*01:01 and *01:02 in Israelis; HLA-DRB1*14:02 in some Native Americans such as Pima and Yakima Indians; HLA-DRB1*10:01 in Greeks (7); and HLA-DRB1*01:01, *04:01, *04:04, and *04:05 in Latin Americans (8). Although the pathogenic mechanisms of these alleles in RA are still unresolved, different hypotheses have been postulated as follows: first, presentation of arthritogenic antigens; second, alterations of peptide affinity during T cell repertoire selection; and third, molecular mimicry with microorganism peptide residues. Another approach is the classical shared epitope (SE) hypothesis, proposed by Gregersen, et al. (9), who by comparing aminoacid sequences encoded by the disease-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles listed above, demonstrated a conserved motif (L-LE-[Q/R]-[R/K]-R-A-A) including residues 70–74 in the third hypervariable region of the DRβ1 chain.
In addition, the HLA-DRB1 locus also harbors some protective alleles known as the DERAA sequence at the same position in the third hypervariable region of the DRB1 chain residues 70–74, specifically, aspartic acid (D) at position 70. The DERAA alleles are HLA-DRB1*01:03, *04:02, *11:02, *11:03, *13:01, *13:02, and *13:04. People carrying HLA-DRB1 alleles that express this DERAA sequence display a lower susceptibility to RA and have less severe disease than people with SE-negative and DERAA-negative HLA-DRB1 alleles (10). Alleles associated with SE and DERAA sequence are listed in Table 2 (11).
Table 2
SE and SE-negative HLA-DRB1 alleles.
It has been suggested that alleles carrying the SE induce the activation of autoreactive T cells. This is complemented by crystallographic studies in which it has been observed that a glutamine (Q) at position 70 and an arginine or lysine residue (R/K) at position 71 of the β chain establish a direct interaction with the T cell receptor (TCR) by selecting a specific population of T lymphocytes “SE recognizers.”
Other studies have shown that changes at residues 70 to 74 of the β-chain of the SE alleles can generate a total change in the range of peptides that are initially presented by these molecules through directed mutagenesis (12). In the SE, both its residues defined by specific genotypes and the LD that these alleles may have with other loci — either as HLA and non-HLA — are important. This type of genetic pattern also affects the risk depending on the genotypic conformation. For example, if the individual has one or both alleles for SE, the risk effect for the SE homozygous individual is 50% less and for the heterozygous one, 30% adducing a penetrance variability dependent on genotype status. Therefore, it can be concluded that the relative risk (RR) can be high with respect to the presence of SE but not enough for RA to be present in 100% of individuals who carry it (7).
Further, when the relationship between anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) and HLA-DRB1 have been studied, they have revealed that the association between DRB1 SE alleles and RA was restricted to ACPA-positive RA but not ACPA-negative RA patients in different populations (13). Just 12.7% of the phenotypic variance can be explained by susceptibility loci within the MHC region compared to ~4% for non-MHC loci. This leaves most of the MHC association to be explained by HLA-DRB1 in RA (14). Furthermore, there is evidence that four amino acids at positions 11, 13, 71, and 74 in the HLA-DRB1 molecule are important for the susceptibility to RA in ACPA-positive patients (Figure 1). These amino acids have side-chains pointing into the groove and are thus important for and possibly define the peptide binding properties of the HLA molecule. Moreover, amino acids 71 and 74 are part of the SE and, as mentioned above, are implicated in conferring risk to RA. The association at these four positions with ACPA-positive RA patients is different and depends on the HLA-DRB1 polymorphisms. Thus, HLA-DRB1*04:01, *04:08,*04:05, and *04:04 are the risk alleles most significantly associated with ACPA-positive RA in European individuals. Additional associations for HLA-B*08 and for a group of HLA-DP1 alleles with ACPA-positive RA have also been reported. For both molecules encoded by these HLA genes, there is a substitution in position 9 which may allow a functional impact on antigenic peptide presentation to T Cells (15) (Figure 1).
According to new insights into the functional role of the SE in RA pathogenesis, this is transduced not by means of an adaptative response but by an innate response transduction. De Almeida et al., suggested that in dendritic cells (DC), a SE-triggered signaling is transduced via cell surface calreticulin (CRT), a molecule involved in clearance of apoptotic cells. Signaling by CRT ligation would occur with the SE through the P-domain of CRT. Following an initial binding, activation of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production is initiated, leading to two different outputs. In CD11c(+)CD8(+) DCs, the SE inhibits the enzymatic activity of indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO), a key enzyme in immune tolerance and T cell regulation, whereas in CD11c(+)CD8(−) DCs, the ligand activates the production of IL-6 and IL-17 (16). Likewise, the same group demonstrated that the SE ligand interacts with cell-surface CRT on osteoclasts (OC) and activates NO and ROS production. The former is supported by the fact that SE activates Th17-dependent osteoclastogenesis by enhancing the differentiation of RANKL-expressing IL-17–producing T cells (17) (Figure 2).
Multiple sclerosis (MS)
This condition corresponds to an autoimmune pathology with a predominant immune cell response characterized by the presence of autoreactive T cells that react against the myelin basic protein (MBP), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), and the proteolipid protein (PLP). The HLA-DRB1*15:01 and HLA-DQB1*06:02 alleles, which are in LD, are the main alleles associated with risk for MS in Caucasians and Latin Americans (18). Recently, in a large combined multinational cohort in the International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (IMSGC) GWAS study, the HLA-DRB1*13:03 allele was also identified as being associated with MS (OR=2.43). Furthermore, HLA-DRB1*01:08 (OR=1.18) and HLA-DRB1*03:01 (which is strongly linked to HLA-DQB1*02:01; OR=1.26) showed significant associations. Evidence of an additive effect for each additional allele was also described (19). In the Sardinia region of Italy, where MS prevalence is high, HLA-DRB1*04, HLA-DRB1*03:01, and HLA-DRB1*13:01 (in addition to HLA-DRB1*15:01) positive associations with MS have been reported (20).
Several studies have explored phenotype-genotype correlation for associated HLA alleles in MS and reported that HLA-DRB1*15 has been associated with younger age at onset and a worse Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score as well as severe morbidity in patients with primary progressive MS (21). Both the carriage of HLA-DRB1*15 and the presence of oligoclonal bands in the cerebrospinal fluid have been reported to hasten disease progression (22).
MS studies in animal models [i.e., experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE)] and human models have focused on the 84–102 MBP peptide, known as immunodominant epitope ENPVVHFFKNIVTPR, based on which the crystallographically complex HLA-DRB1*15:01 - MBP peptide has been disclosed. The most prominent feature of this peptide is the capability of the P4 pocket DRB1*15:01 molecule to bind hydrophobic residues due to the presence of an alanine (Ala), which receives the phenylalanine residue (Phe) peptide of MBP (2,23). The P4 not only accommodates the Phe, but because of its size, it can also incorporate residues, e.g., Ala (aromatic) and Lys, which interact perfectly with the negative charge of the pocket. Still, the role of the P4 anchor residues is not a prerequisite for developing the disease, so it is assumed that there are additional factors that may or may not be associated with HLA that can trigger the disease.
The potential of peptide-based therapy for treatment of MS and its relationship with the MHC molecules has been explored. Copaxone, is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug for treatment of MS. The synthetic random amino acid copolymer, Copolymer 1 (Cop 1, Copaxone, glatiramer acetate) was the first drug based on four amino acids (L-alanine, L-lysine, L-glutamic acid, and L lysine) from MBP. Cop-1 suppresses EAE, slows the progression of disability, and reduces the relapse rate in MS. Cop 1 binds to various class II MHC molecules including HLA-DRB1*15:01, inhibits the T cell responses to several myelin antigens, shifts Th1 response to Th2, and upregulates T regulatory cell expression. Later, it was proved that Cop-1 causes demyelination arrest and induces remyelination when given to EAE mice (24).
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
The HLA, as per almost all the ADs, has been shown to exert the strongest genetic association and effect on SLE to date. The top association was found at HLA-DRB1. Studies examining HLA class II have consistently replicated the HLA-DR2 (DRB1*15:01), HLA-DR3 (DRB1*03:01), HLA-DRB1*08:01, and HLA-DQA1*01:02 alleles associated with the disease in American and European populations with a two fold RR conferred by each allele (25–28). The extended HLA 8.1 AH (ancestral haplotype) is considered a common European haplotype implicated in SLE susceptibility (See section below). GWAS in both European and Asian populations has shown that the strongest contribution to risk for SLE resides in the HLA region and consists of multiple genetic effects (29). The long-range LD within the HLA region has made assessing the relative contribution of each component gene to disease susceptibility difficult. However, the available evidence suggests that genetic variants such as HLA-DR2 and HLA-DR3, HLA-DPB1, HLA-G, and class III (such as MSH5 and SKIV2L) genes, in particular, predispose an individual to SLE (30).
Moreover, the role of SLE-associated HLA class II alleles in initiating SLE-relevant autoantibody responses has been demonstrated in humanized mice expressing the HLA-DR3 transgene but no other DR or DQ alleles (31). Microarray studies done on SLE patients have revealed that the MHC class I genes are under expressed when compared with controls (32). The MHC class I region is required for the detection of intracellular pathogens by CD8+ T cells, and its absence seems to lead to a failure to defend against such pathogens. A certain gene transcription signature in CD8+ T cells has been linked to SLE disease prognosis (33).
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D)
Several alleles have been associated with and linked to susceptibility to T1D including HLA-DQB1*03:02 and DQB1*02:01 (34,35). It is known that individuals with both alleles have a higher RR of developing the disease when compared to the general population. Similarly, many DRB1*04 alleles, which are in LD with the DQB1*03:02 allele may modify the RR for the disease. In summary, the HLA association with T1D is one of the most complex. It was initially suggested that HLA-B8, HLA-B18, and HLA-B15 (B62) were higher in patients with this disease (36). Then, as the molecular tests were developed, the association expanded to HLA-DR3 alleles (i.e., HLA-DRB1*03:01), HLA-DR4 (HLA-DRB1*04), HLA DQB1*02:01, and HLA-DQB1*03:02. Although the quantity of alleles found associated with T1D in the DR and DQ loci is high, the role of the locus or loci conferring susceptibility/protection is unclear given that they are presented with low effects when compared to the identified susceptibility haplotypes of T1D (Table 3) (37). This can be explained by the variety of existing alleles in the HLA, population changes, and the pattern of inheritance for both susceptibility and protection alleles such as HLA-DRB1*15:01 and/or HLA-DQB1*06:02 (36,38).
Table 3
MHC markers associated with autoimmune type 1 diabetes mellitus and their relative risks (RR).
Studies of human cell lines of T lymphocytes restricted by DR and DQ alleles have reported autoantigens associated with the disease including insulin, glutamate decarboxylase (GAD65), and tyrosine phosphatase pancreatic islet antigens known as IA-2. In addition, transgenic mice experiments for HLA-DQ*03:02 helped identify the presence of GAD specific T lymphocytes (39) while others suggest that the peptide Ins B9.23 could be an immunodominant autoantigen restricted to HLA-DQ (40).
Initial reports indicate that HLA-DQ*03:02 is the preferred molecule for peptides with a negative charge in the anchor residue which binds to the P9 pocket (41). These observations are supported by binding experiments between Insulin B chain (residues 9–23, SHLVEALYLVCGERG) and the HLA molecule DQ*03:02 (42). Negatively charged peptides in the same position could make a bridge between the MHC molecule and Arg, which would help to stabilize the complex. This would increase its half-life in contrast to what was observed with peptides that had no negative charge. Furthermore, the molecules of HLA-DQ*03:02 are larger at P4, which allows them to accommodate hydrophobic peptide residues such as phenylalanine (Phe) and tyrosine (Tyr) while unable to accept positively charged residues. The P1 of the DQB1*03:02 molecules is highly polar. Therefore, it may contain positively charged residues such as histidine (His) and arginine (Arg). It has also been possible to establish a molecular characteristic for the molecule corresponding to the protective allele which is that, unlike DQ*03:02, DQ*06:02 prefers aliphatic residues attached to P9 (43). Similarly, the 57 residue of the β chain of the DQ molecules also contributes to the pattern of peptides bound by these molecules. However, studies suggest that P9 is what determines the selection of autoreactive peptides involved in the development of T1D.
Sjögren’s syndrome (SS)
SS is an autoimmune exocrinopathy characterized by a lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration of the salivary and lachrymal glands. This is accompanied by de novo production of autoantibodies leading to keratoconjuntivitis sicca and xerostomia. A recent meta-analysis of association studies from around the world identified associations between HLA Class II and SS. A total of 1,166 cases and 6,470 controls from 23 studies were analyzed including 16 different populations. At the allelic level, DQA1*05:01, DQB1*02:01, and DRB1*03:01 alleles were found to be risk factors for the disease. Conversely, the DQA1*02:01, DQA1*03:01, and DQB1*05:01 alleles were protective factors (44). However, there are other risk alleles/haplotypes specific for each population such as DRB3*01:01 in Norwegians (45), DRB3*01:01 and DQB1*06:02 in Danes (46), DRB1*04:05-DQB1*04:01 in Japanese (47), DRB1*08:03-DQB1*06:01 in Chinese (47), and DRB1*11:01, DRB1*11:04, DQB1*03:01 in Israeli, Jews, and Greek (48).
Particular HLA class II alleles may play an important role in the regulation of the immune responses against the Ro and La ribonucleoproteins. The generation of these autoantibodies has been correlated with the alleles DRB1*03, DQA1*05:01, and DQB1*02:01 in SS patients (49–52). Likewise, while HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR8 were correlated with anti-Ro and anti-La responses in patients with SS and SLE, HLA-DR2 is associated with anti-Ro responses in the absence of anti-La (53). Furthermore, an induction of strong T and B cell responses by a human recombinant Ro60 protein was observed in transgenic mice carrying DR2, DR3, or DQ8 HLA genes but not in mice carrying DQ6 genes (54). Thereafter, using two different artificial neural networks (NetMHCIIpan and the Immune Epitope Database Analysis Resource), five La peptides (La18–32, La49–63, La101–115, La153–167, La241–255), and three Ro peptides (Ro125–139, Ro244–258, Ro523–537) with the ability to bind strongly to HLA-DRB1*03:01 risk allele were identified (44). Thus, differences in the biochemical characteristics of critical amino acids are directly related to either the risk or protection conferred by HLA Class II alleles associated with SS.
Celiac disease (CD)
CD is a complex disorder of the small intestine caused by an inappropriate immune response to ingested wheat gluten (See chapter 33). CD has a strong genetic component as illustrated by a monozygotic twin concordance of nearly 90% compared to 10% in first-degree relatives (55). A significant proportion of the genetic predisposition comes from HLA genes. HLA-DQ2 (encoded by HLA-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*02:01) or HLA-DQ8 (encoded by DQA1*03:01-DQB1*03:02) is expressed in 30%–35% of the populations where CD is prevalent with only 2%–5% of gene carriers developing CD. This implicates other genetic as well as environmental factors as contributors to the manifestation of CD (56).
The principal disease triggering component of wheat gluten belongs to a family of closely related proline-rich and glutamine-rich proteins called gliadins. When genetically predisposed individuals who express HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 are exposed to certain gliadin epitopes, these epitopes are presented on the surface of antigen presenting cells (APC) in the lamina propria. These, in turn stimulate proliferation of gliadin-specific CD4 T cells in the mucosa. A 33-mer peptide of α2-gliadin, in particular, which is extremely resistant to gastrointestinal digestion because of its rich proline content, is the most powerful immunodominantgliadin peptide. In CD patients, undigested gliadin fragments present in the intestinal lumen can be transported and released intact in the mucosa thereby triggering an immune response and perpetuating intestinal inflammation (57).
DQ2 and DQ8 molecules can only bind gliadin peptides if they have been enzymatically modified by tissue transglutaminase (TG2). This pleiotropic enzyme, which is present in many organs including the small intestine, catalyzes a deamination of certain glutamine residues, the most abundant amino acid in gluten, by converting them into glutamate residues. When deamidated, most of the resultant negatively charged gluten peptides bind more strongly to HLA-DQ2 (or HLA-DQ8), which leads to a more rigorous gluten-specific CD4+ Th1 T Cell activation (58).
Although DQ2- and DQ8-restricted T cells can recognize the same gliadin peptides in exactly the same registers (for instance peptides that share the core sequence QQPQQPFPQ), these peptides have been deamidated at different positions: deamidation at position P4 or P6 is mandatory for recognition by DQ2-restricted T cells, whereas deamidation at position P1 and/or P9 is critical for DQ8-restricted recognition. In addition, most of the characterized DQ2-restricted gliadin T Cell epitopes have proline residues at P1, whereas DQ8 is unlikely to tolerate a proline at P1 and so selects other sequences that are more likely to be sensitive to proteases, in particular, aminopeptidases (59).
Altogether, these data are significant for clinical practice because HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 are such strong disease risk factors that their absence has a negative predictive value for CD that is close to 100%. In addition, this knowledge will allow the design of new therapeutic approaches (60).
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
AD association with class I HLA alleles is rare, except in (AS), considered an autoinflammatory disease rather than an AD. HLA-B*27 has been observed in 96% of patients suffering from AS. It is clear that not all of the B*27 alleles are associated with the pathology. This is the main reason why the conformational differences in the α-chains have been analyzed. Lys at position 70 on the α-chain is a common residue of the B*27 allele group. Yet, specific combinations of polymorphic residues correspond to His 9, Glu 45, Cys 67, and Ala 71 and all are grouped to form pocket P2 of the molecule. The Glu 45 and Cys 67 are located in the deepest part of P2 and receive higher affinity anchor residues of peptides containing Arg. Furthermore, the Lys 70 which is common to all B*27 interacts with Asp 74 but does not seem to be critical in the association with AS in contrast to what is observed when the position has a Tyr 74 belonging to the B*27:01 allele which associates with MS. Although B*27 associations appear to be strictly dependent on the conformation of their residues, this leads us to think that autoantigenic peptides should be an important component in the susceptibility and pathophysiology of AS. So far these autoantigens have not been identified (61,62).
HLA commonalities among autoimmune diseases
Ancestral 8.1. haplotype
Conserved DNA sequences that act as extended haplotypes or ancestral haplotypes (AHs) are a typical feature of the MHC because of a high LD phenomena observed between loci and alleles throughout the region. It is believed that about 30% of the MHC haplotypes are AH in populations such as Caucasian (63). The AH made by the MHC is identified as having identical allelic variants in the regions that are mapped between HLA-B and HLA-DRB1. Some of these AHs are accepted as susceptibility markers for ADs (64). The existence of these AHs has allowed alleles such as HLA-DRB1*03:01 and *04:01 to be established (65,66).
The association of AHs with ADs has been studied more in the Caucasian population, and it has been established that the 8.1 AH is made up of HLA-A*01,-C*07,-B*08 in the class I region and DRB1*03:01-DRB3*01:01-DQA1*05:011-DQB1*02:01-DPA1*01-DPB1*03:01-TAP1*01:01 TAP2*02:01 in the class II region including genes composed of C2-C4A-TNF2 in the class III region. This haplotype is associated with SLE, SS, and T1D. Functionally, it can be seen that HLA class II alleles that are part of this AH are the same as those susceptibility alleles discussed for each aforementioned AD. Furthermore, these alleles that constitute the extended haplotype possess well defined immunological characteristics (Table 4) that can be associated with the pathophysiology of ADs (64).
Table 4
Ancestral haplotype 8.1 immunological characteristics.
Another AH associated with ADs is the AH 7.2, which consists of the HLA-A*03:01-C*07-B*07:02 in class I and DRB1*15:01-DRB5*01:01-DQA1*01:02-DRB6*02:01-DQB1*06:02-DPA1*01-DPB1*04:01 for class II and includes the TNF1 gene in the class III region. This AH is associated with susceptibility to SLE and MS although its importance lies in the association with infectious diseases such as leprosy and tuberculosis, and it also behaves as protective for T1D (67). Although their molecular function is not clear, this AH seems to behave like a slow stimulator of the innate and acquired immune response since there is a diminished synthesis of complement factors C4A and C4B. In addition, the synthesis of cytokines and chemotactic factors is less effective which may partially explain the susceptibility to infectious diseases.
Many studies have been done to establish the role of these AH. Therefore, after obtaining the complete sequence draft for the human genome, eight well characterized AHs for the MHC were reported as part of the human MHC Haplotype Project (Table 5). Further characterization of these AH in different populations and deciphering of their different functions (68) including the gene mapping in the class III region is crucial for a better understanding of the association between MHC and ADs.
Table 5
Different HLA-homozygous typing haplotypes provided by The MHC Haplotype Project.
Shared HLA alleles in ADs
Through a meta-analysis, the genetic commonalities in ADs were analyzed by examining the contributions from HLA-II alleles which confer associated risk or protection on six ADs: RA, SLE, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), MS, SS, and T1D in the Latin American (LA) population. A total of 3,727 cases and 8,465 controls were analyzed and different types of association between alleles and ADs were found (Table 6). These included three risk alleles for two or more ADs, four opposite associations (the same allele is a risk factor for one AD but a protective factor for another AD), thirteen risk alleles for a particular AD, and eight protective alleles that are disease-specific (8). The associations were grouped in the network in Figure 3.
Table 6
Associations between HLA class II and six ADs: SLE, RA, T1D, AIH, SS, and MS.

Figure 3
The complex interplay of HLA in six autoimmune diseases in Latin Americans.
Some HLA class II alleles for ADs in LA are similar to those reported for other population groups regardless of latitudinal gradient and admixture. For instance, DRB1*03:01, DRB1*04:05, DRB1*04:01, and DQB1*02:01 risk alleles for T1D in LA also confer susceptibility in Caucasians and Asians (69). DRB1*03:01 allele, which has been described as a risk factor for SS in the Colombian population, was also associated with the disease at the global level (44). However, there are other genes that influence the development of ADs in a particular population which are not replicated in another one (i.e., PADI4 and SLC22A4 genes) (70).
Two alleles were found to influence the risk of developing three different diseases. The DRB1*03:01 allele was found to be a risk for SLE, SS, and T1D while DRB1*04:05 allele was associated with AIH, T1D, and RA. In addition to sharing HLA alleles, these ADs share other characteristics which reinforce the common origin of ADs theory (Table 7). At the genetic level, AD association with non-HLA genes has been observed. For instance, PTPN22 1858T/C (71) and TNF-α -308G/A (72–74) are associated with SLE, SS, and T1D. Likewise, the CTLA4 gene has been reported to be a risk factor for AIH, T1D, and RA (14,75,76). Another consideration concerning genetic findings is the familial aggregation. Relatives of patients with ADs have a higher risk than general population of developing the same or other ADs (77). At the clinical level, shared autoantibodies in ADs have also been described. Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are present in multiple ADs such as SLE, SS, RA, T1D, AIH, and MS (8).
Table 7
Relationship between genetic and clinical features with HLA-ADs associations.
Regarding opposite associations, DQB1*06:02 and DRB1*15 alleles were found to be risk factors for MS but protective factors for T1D. These results are similar to those from other studies reporting that other MHC genes such as CDSN and HLA-DMB (rs3130981-A and rs151719-G respectively) are risk factors for MS but protective ones for T1D. However, there is also evidence of the inverse relationship. For instance, TAP2 (rs10484565-T), VARS2 (rs1264303-G), NOTCH4 (rs2071286-A), BTNL2 (rs2076530-G), and TRIM40 (rs757262-T) were found to be risk factors for T1D but protective factors for MS (78). Despite the presence of these genetically opposite associations, it is important to mention that clinical evidence supporting the coexistence of MS and T1D has been reported (79). Thus, these pleiotropic effects may be explained by the combined action of different alleles of several genes and environmental factors that change the biological context of the SNPs in different individuals and populations (Table 7).
In summary, the results of this meta-analysis validate the common origin of the AD paradigm. The finding of significant risk and protective alleles in LA and the fact that they are shared with other populations around the world highlights the primary role of some HLA regions in genetic susceptibility to ADs regardless of latitudinal gradient and ethnicity.
References
- 1.
- Bogdanos DP, Smyk DS, Rigopoulou EI, et al. Twin studies in autoimmune disease: genetics, gender and environment. J Autoimmun. 2012;38:J156–69. [PubMed: 22177232]
- 2.
- Gebe JA, Swanson E, Kwok WW. HLA class II peptide-binding and autoimmunity. Tissue antigens. 2002;59:78–87. [PubMed: 12028533]
- 3.
- Klein J, Sato A. The HLA system. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:782–6. [PubMed: 10984567]
- 4.
- Davidson A, Diamond B. Autoimmune diseases. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:340–50. [PubMed: 11484692]
- 5.
- Sfriso P, Ghirardello A, Botsios C, et al. Infections and autoimmunity: the multifaceted relationship. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;87:385–95. [PubMed: 20015961]
- 6.
- Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA. Overview of mapping common and genetically complex disease genes. In: Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA, editors. Approaches to Gene Mapping in Complex Human Diseases. 1st ed. Wiley-Liss; 1998. pp. 1–16.
- 7.
- Newton JL, Harney SMJ, Wordsworth BP, Brown MA. A review of the MHC genetics of rheumatoid arthritis. Genes Immun. 2004;5:151–7. [PubMed: 14749714]
- 8.
- Cruz-Tapias P, Pérez-Fernández OM, Rojas-Villarraga A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez A, Arango MT, Anaya JM. Shared HLA Class II in Six Autoimmune Diseases in Latin America: A Meta-Analysis. Autoimmune Dis. 2012:569728. [PMC free article: PMC3345213] [PubMed: 22577522]
- 9.
- Gregersen PK, Silver J, Winchester RJ. The shared epitope hypothesis. An approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30:1205–13. [PubMed: 2446635]
- 10.
- Feitsma AL, Van der Helm-van Mil AHM, Huizinga TWJ, De Vries RRP, Toes REM. Protection against rheumatoid arthritis by HLA: nature and nurture. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:iii61–3. [PubMed: 19022816]
- 11.
- Holoshitz J. The rheumatoid arthritis HLA-DRB1 shared epitope. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2010;22:293–8. [PMC free article: PMC2921962] [PubMed: 20061955]
- 12.
- Hammer J, Bono E, Gallazzi F, Belunis C, Nagy Z, Sinigaglia F. Precise prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II-peptide interaction based on peptide side chain scanning. J Exp Med. 1994;180:2353–8. [PMC free article: PMC2191799] [PubMed: 7964508]
- 13.
- Huizinga TWJ, Amos CI, Van der Helm-van Mil AHM, et al. Refining the complex rheumatoid arthritis phenotype based on specificity of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope for antibodies to citrullinated proteins. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3433–8. [PubMed: 16255021]
- 14.
- Stahl EA, Raychaudhuri S, Remmers EF, et al. Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies seven new rheumatoid arthritis risk loci. Nat Genet. 2010;42:508–14. [PMC free article: PMC4243840] [PubMed: 20453842]
- 15.
- Raychaudhuri S, Sandor C, Stahl EA, et al. Five amino acids in three HLA proteins explain most of the association between MHC and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet. 2012;44:291–6. [PMC free article: PMC3288335] [PubMed: 22286218]
- 16.
- De Almeida DE, Ling S, Pi X, Hartmann-Scruggs AM, Pumpens P, Holoshitz J. Immune dysregulation by the rheumatoid arthritis shared epitope. J immunol. 2010;185:1927–34. [PMC free article: PMC3111926] [PubMed: 20592276]
- 17.
- Holoshitz J, Liu Y, Fu J, et al. An HLA-DRB1-coded signal transduction ligand facilitates inflammatory arthritis: a new mechanism of autoimmunity. J immunol. 2013;190:48–57. [PMC free article: PMC3529776] [PubMed: 23180817]
- 18.
- Rojas OL, Rojas-Villarraga A, Cruz-Tapias P, et al. HLA class II polymorphism in Latin American patients with multiple sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:407–13. [PubMed: 19896562]
- 19.
- Sawcer S, Hellenthal G, Pirinen M, et al. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2011;476:214–9. [PMC free article: PMC3182531] [PubMed: 21833088]
- 20.
- Brassat D, Salemi G, Barcellos LF, et al. The HLA locus and multiple sclerosis in Sicily. Neurology. 2005;64:361–3. [PubMed: 15668443]
- 21.
- Vasconcelos CCF, Fernández O, Leyva L, Thuler LCS, Alvarenga RMP. Does the DRB1*1501 allele confer more severe and faster progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis patients? HLA in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;214:101–3. [PubMed: 19616314]
- 22.
- Imrell K, Greiner E, Hillert J, Masterman T. HLA-DRB115 and cerebrospinal-fluid-specific oligoclonal immunoglobulin G bands lower age at attainment of important disease milestones in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;210:128–30. [PubMed: 19327846]
- 23.
- Vogt AB, Kropshofer H, Kalbacher H, et al. Ligand motifs of HLA-DRB5*0101 and DRB1*1501 molecules delineated from self-peptides. J immunol. 1994;153:1665–73. [PubMed: 7519208]
- 24.
- Aharoni R, Herschkovitz A, Eilam R, et al. Demyelination arrest and remyelination induced by glatiramer acetate treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:11358–63. [PMC free article: PMC2516229] [PubMed: 18678887]
- 25.
- Fernando MMA, Stevens CR, Sabeti PC, et al. Identification of two independent risk factors for lupus within the MHC in United Kingdom families. PLoS genet. 2007;3:e192. [PMC free article: PMC2065882] [PubMed: 17997607]
- 26.
- Deng Y, Tsao BP. Genetic susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus in the genomic era. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:683–92. [PMC free article: PMC3135416] [PubMed: 21060334]
- 27.
- Morris DL, Taylor KE, Fernando MMA, et al. Unraveling multiple MHC gene associations with systemic lupus erythematosus: model choice indicates a role for HLA alleles and non-HLA genes in Europeans. Am J Med Genet. 2012;91:778–93. [PMC free article: PMC3487133] [PubMed: 23084292]
- 28.
- Bronson PG, Komorowski LK, Ramsay PP, et al. Analysis of maternal-offspring HLA compatibility, parent-of-origin effects, and noninherited maternal antigen effects for HLADRB1 in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:1712–7. [PMC free article: PMC2948464] [PubMed: 20191587]
- 29.
- Guerra SG, Vyse TJ. Cunninghame Graham DS. The genetics of lupus: a functional perspective. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14:211. [PMC free article: PMC3446495] [PubMed: 22640752]
- 30.
- Fernando MMA, Freudenberg J, Lee A, et al. Transancestral mapping of the MHC region in systemic lupus erythematosus identifies new independent and interacting loci at MSH5, HLADPB1 and HLA-G. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:777–84. [PMC free article: PMC3329227] [PubMed: 22233601]
- 31.
- Jiang C, Deshmukh US, Gaskin F, et al. Differential responses to Smith D autoantigen by mice with HLA-DR and HLA-DQ transgenes: dominant responses by HLA-DR3 transgenic mice with diversification of autoantibodies to small nuclear ribonucleoprotein, double-stranded DNA, and nuclear antigens. J immunol. 2010;184:1085–91. [PMC free article: PMC2842881] [PubMed: 20007529]
- 32.
- Chaussabel D, Quinn C, Shen J, et al. A modular analysis framework for blood genomics studies: application to systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity. 2008;29:150–64. [PMC free article: PMC2727981] [PubMed: 18631455]
- 33.
- McKinney EF, Lyons PA, Carr EJ, et al. A CD8+ T cell transcription signature predicts prognosis in autoimmune disease. Nat Med. 2010;16:586–91. [PMC free article: PMC3504359] [PubMed: 20400961]
- 34.
- Barnett AH, Eff C, Leslie RD, Pyke DA. Diabetes in identical twins. A study of 200 pairs. Diabetologia. 1981;20:87–93. [PubMed: 7193616]
- 35.
- Wagener DK, Sacks JM, LaPorte RE, Macgregor JM. The Pittsburgh study of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Risk for diabetes among relatives of IDDM. Diabetes. 1982;31:136–44. [PubMed: 6759229]
- 36.
- Nerup J, Platz P, Andersen OO, et al. HL-A antigens and diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1974;2:864–6. [PubMed: 4137711]
- 37.
- Larsen CE, Alper CA. The genetics of HLA-associated disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2004;16:660–7. [PubMed: 15342014]
- 38.
- Erlich HA, Griffith RL, Bugawan TL, Ziegler R, Alper C, Eisenbarth G. Implication of specific DQB1 alleles in genetic susceptibility and resistance by identification of IDDM siblings with novel HLA-DQB1 allele and unusual DR2 and DR1 haplotypes. Diabetes. 1991;40:478–81. [PubMed: 2010048]
- 39.
- Herman AE, Tisch RM, Patel SD, et al. Determination of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 peptides presented by the type I diabetes-associated HLA-DQ8 class II molecule identifies an immunogenic peptide motif. J immunol. 1999;163:6275–82. [PubMed: 10570321]
- 40.
- Alleva DG, Crowe PD, Jin L, et al. A disease-associated cellular immune response in type 1 diabetics to an immunodominant epitope of insulin. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:173–80. [PMC free article: PMC198872] [PubMed: 11160133]
- 41.
- Kwok WW, Domeier ML, Raymond FC, Byers P, Nepom GT. Allele-specific motifs characterize HLA-DQ interactions with a diabetes-associated peptide derived from glutamic acid decarboxylase. J immunol. 1996;156:2171–7. [PubMed: 8690906]
- 42.
- Lee KH, Wucherpfennig KW, Wiley DC. Structure of a human insulin peptide-HLA-DQ8 complex and susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:501–7. [PubMed: 11376336]
- 43.
- Ettinger RA, Kwok WW. A peptide binding motif for HLADQA1*0102/DQB1*0602, the class II MHC molecule associated with dominant protection in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J immunol. 1998;160:2365–73. [PubMed: 9498778]
- 44.
- Cruz-Tapias P, Rojas-Villarraga A, Maier-Moore S, Anaya JM. HLA and Sjögren’s syndrome susceptibility. A meta-analysis of worldwide studies. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11:281–7. [PubMed: 22001416]
- 45.
- Nakken B, Jonsson R, Brokstad KA, et al. Associations of MHC class II alleles in Norwegian primary Sjögren’s syndrome patients: implications for development of autoantibodies to the Ro52 autoantigen. Scand J Immunol. 2001;54:428–33. [PubMed: 11555411]
- 46.
- Morling N, Andersen V, Fugger L, et al. Immunogenetics of rheumatoid arthritis and primary Sjögren’s syndrome: DNA polymorphism of HLA class II genes. Dis Markers. 1991;9:289–96. [PubMed: 1686751]
- 47.
- Kang HI, Fei HM, Saito I, et al. Comparison of HLA class II genes in Caucasoid, Chinese, and Japanese patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. J immunol. 1993;150:3615–23. [PubMed: 8468491]
- 48.
- Roitberg-Tambur A, Friedmann A, Safirman C, et al. Molecular analysis of HLA class II genes in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. A study of Israeli Jewish and Greek non-Jewish patients. Hum Immunol. 1993;36:235–42. [PubMed: 8340232]
- 49.
- Harley JB, Reichlin M, Arnett FC, Alexander EL, Bias WB, Provost TT. Gene interaction at HLA-DQ enhances autoantibody production in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Science. 1986;232:1145–7. [PubMed: 3458307]
- 50.
- Reveille JD, Macleod MJ, Whittington K, Arnett FC. Specific amino acid residues in the second hypervariable region of HLA-DQA1 and DQB1 chain genes promote the Ro (SS-A)/La(SS-B) autoantibody responses. J immunol. 1991;146:3871–6. [PubMed: 2033256]
- 51.
- Bolstad AI, Wassmuth R, Haga HJ, Jonsson R. HLA markers and clinical characteristics in Caucasians with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. The J Rheumatol. 2001;28:1554–62. [PubMed: 11469461]
- 52.
- Gottenberg JE, Busson M, Loiseau P, et al. In primary Sjögren’s syndrome, HLA class II is associated exclusively with autoantibody production and spreading of the autoimmune response. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:2240–5. [PubMed: 12905478]
- 53.
- Mavragani CP, Tzioufas AG, Moutsopoulos HM. Sjögren’s syndrome: autoantibodies to cellular antigens. Clinical and molecular aspects. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2000;123:46–57. [PubMed: 11014971]
- 54.
- Paisansinsup T, Deshmukh US, Chowdhary VR, Luthra HS, Fu SM, David CS. HLA class II influences the immune response and antibody diversification to Ro60/Sjögren’s syndrome-A: heightened antibody responses and epitope spreading in mice expressing HLA-DR molecules. J immunol. 2002;168:5876–84. [PubMed: 12023392]
- 55.
- Greco L, Romino R, Coto I, et al. The first large population based twin study of coeliac disease. Gut. 2002;50:624–8. [PMC free article: PMC1773191] [PubMed: 11950806]
- 56.
- Wolters VM, Wijmenga C. Genetic background of celiac disease and its clinical implications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:190–5. [PubMed: 18184122]
- 57.
- Shan L, Molberg O, Parrot I, et al. Structural basis for gluten intolerance in celiac sprue. Science. 2002;297:2275–9. [PubMed: 12351792]
- 58.
- Molberg O, Mcadam SN, Körner R, et al. Tissue transglutaminase selectively modifies gliadin peptides that are recognized by gut-derived T cells in celiac disease. Nat Med. 1998;4:713–7. [PubMed: 9623982]
- 59.
- Kim CY, Quarsten H, Bergseng E, Khosla C, Sollid LM. Structural basis for HLA-DQ2-mediated presentation of gluten epitopes in celiac disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4175–9. [PMC free article: PMC384714] [PubMed: 15020763]
- 60.
- Schuppan D, Junker Y, Barisani D. Celiac disease: from pathogenesis to novel therapies. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1912–33. [PubMed: 19766641]
- 61.
- Buxton SE, Benjamin RJ, Clayberger C, Parham P, Krensky AM. Anchoring pockets in human histocompatibility complex leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I molecules: analysis of the conserved B (“45”) pocket of HLA-B27. J Exp Med. 1992;175:809–20. [PMC free article: PMC2119159] [PubMed: 1371304]
- 62.
- Jardetzky TS, Lane WS, Robinson RA, Madden DR, Wiley DC. Identification of self peptides bound to purified HLA-B27. Nature. 1991;353:326–9. [PubMed: 1922338]
- 63.
- Yunis EJ, Larsen CE, Fernandez-Viña M, et al. Inheritable variable sizes of DNA stretches in the human MHC: conserved extended haplotypes and their fragments or blocks. Tissue antigens. 2003;62:1–20. [PubMed: 12859592]
- 64.
- Candore G, Lio D, Colonna Romano G, Caruso C. Pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases associated with 8.1 ancestral haplotype: effect of multiple gene interactions. Autoimmun Rev. 2002;1:29–35. [PubMed: 12849055]
- 65.
- Rotter JI, Anderson CE, Rubin R, Congleton JE, Terasaki PI, Rimoin DL. HLA genotypic study of insulin-dependent diabetes the excess of DR3/DR4 heterozygotes allows rejection of the recessive hypothesis. Diabetes. 1983;32:169–74. [PubMed: 6402405]
- 66.
- Payami H, Thomson G, Motro U, Louis EJ, Hudes E. The affected sib method. IV. Sib trios. Ann Hum Genet. 1985;49:303–14. [PubMed: 3865624]
- 67.
- Dawkins R, Leelayuwat C, Gaudieri S, et al. Genomics of the major histocompatibility complex: haplotypes, duplication, retroviruses and disease. Immunol Rev. 1999;167:275–304. [PubMed: 10319268]
- 68.
- Stewart CA, Horton R, Allcock RJN, et al. Complete MHC haplotype sequencing for common disease gene mapping. Genome Res. 2004;14:1176–87. [PMC free article: PMC419796] [PubMed: 15140828]
- 69.
- Rojas-Villarraga A, Botello-Corzo D, Anaya JM. HLA-Class II in Latin American patients with type 1 diabetes. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:666–73. [PubMed: 20561992]
- 70.
- Delgado-Vega A, Sánchez E, Löfgren S, Castillejo-López C, Alarcón-Riquelme ME. Recent findings on genetics of systemic autoimmune diseases. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22:698–705. [PMC free article: PMC2997852] [PubMed: 20933377]
- 71.
- Serrano NC, Millan P, Páez MC. Non-HLA associations with autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2006;5:209–14. [PubMed: 16483921]
- 72.
- Price P, Witt C, Allcock R, et al. The genetic basis for the association of the 8.1 ancestral haplotype (A1, B8, DR3) with multiple immunopathological diseases. Immunol Rev. 1999;167:257–74. [PubMed: 10319267]
- 73.
- Correa PA, Gomez LM, Cadena J, Anaya JM. Autoimmunity and tuberculosis. Opposite association with TNF polymorphism. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:219–24. [PubMed: 15693080]
- 74.
- Feng RN, Li Y, Sun C-H. TNF 308 G/A polymorphism and type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;85:e4–7. [PubMed: 19477545]
- 75.
- Donaldson PT. Genetics in autoimmune hepatitis. Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22:353–64. [PubMed: 12447707]
- 76.
- Howson JMM, Walker NM, Smyth DJ, Todd JA. Analysis of 19 genes for association with type I diabetes in the Type I Diabetes Genetics Consortium families. Genes Immun. 2009;10(Suppl 1):S74–84. [PMC free article: PMC2810493] [PubMed: 19956106]
- 77.
- Wandstrat A, Wakeland E. The genetics of complex autoimmune diseases: non-MHC susceptibility genes. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:802–9. [PubMed: 11526390]
- 78.
- Sirota M, Schaub MA, Batzoglou S, Robinson WH, Butte AJ. Autoimmune disease classification by inverse association with SNP alleles. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000792. [PMC free article: PMC2791168] [PubMed: 20041220]
- 79.
- Sastre-Garriga J, Tintoré M, Montalban X. Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type II and multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2001;248:330–1. [PubMed: 11374100]
- HLA Association with Autoimmune Diseases - AutoimmunityHLA Association with Autoimmune Diseases - Autoimmunity
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...
