NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Rh Incompatibility

; ; .

Author Information

Last Update: January 27, 2020.

Introduction

Rhesus (Rh) incompatibility refers to the discordant pairing of maternal and fetal Rh type. It is associated with the development of maternal Rh sensitization and hemolytic disease of the neonate (HDN). An individual can be classified as Rh-positive if their erythrocytes express the Rh D antigen; otherwise, an individual is Rh-negative if they do not. This phenomenon becomes clinically significant if a mother that is Rh-negative becomes sensitized to the D antigen and subsequently, produces anti-D antibodies (i.e., alloimmunization) that can bind to and potentially lead to the destruction of Rh-positive erythrocytes. This is of particular concern if a Rh-negative mother is carrying a Rh-positive fetus, which can result in consequences along the spectrum of HDN ranging from self-limited hemolytic anemia to severe hydrops fetalis.

Etiology

As previously mentioned, maternal sensitization occurs in Rh-negative mothers due to exposure to the Rh D antigen. This typically occurs when the Rh-negative mother is carrying a Rh-positive fetus or has been exposed to Rh-positive blood differently. However, if the exposure to the Rh D antigen occurs during the mother’s first pregnancy, the adverse consequences of Rh incompatibility do not typically affect that initial pregnancy because the fetus often is delivered before the development of the anti-D antibodies. Once the mother has been sensitized, future pregnancies are at risk for the development of HDN secondary to Rh incompatibility if the fetus is Rh-positive.[1]

Epidemiology

Rh incompatibility is dependent on the prevalence of Rh-negative blood types, which varies among different populations. Researchers estimate that the frequency of the Rh-negativity occurs more frequently among those of Caucasian (North American and European) descent (15% to 17%) compared to those of African (4% to 8%) or Asian descent (0.1% to 0.3%). Worldwide, the prevalence of Rh disease is estimated to be 276 per 100,000 live births, which is significant considering that an estimated 50% of untreated cases of HDN will either die or develop brain damage due to the disease. In comparison, the prevalence of Rh disease in developed countries has been reduced to 2.5 per 100,000 live births, which can be attributed to higher-quality perinatal-neonatal care.[2][3]

Pathophysiology

When a Rh-negative mother is exposed to the Rh D antigen, the D antigen is perceived as a foreign threat similar to how bacteria and viruses are perceived. This leads to a series of activations of immunogenic pathways that culminates in the production of anti-D antibodies. Those antibodies can bind to the D antigen present on the erythrocytes of Rh-positive fetuses to further activate immunologic pathways that lead to the hemolysis of the fetal erythrocytes.

History and Physical

Rh-negative mothers that have become sensitized to the D antigen may have been exposed to the D antigen in many ways. Taking a detailed history may reveal potential sensitizing events such as:

Exposure to fetal Rh-positive blood

  • Delivery (i.e., vaginal, Cesarean section)
  • Threatened miscarriage, miscarriage
  • Antepartum hemorrhage (e.g., placenta previa, abruption, vasa previa, uterine rupture)
  • Trauma
  • External cephalic version
  • Invasive procedures (e.g., chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis)
  • Ectopic Pregnancy
  • Molar pregnancy 

 Nonfetal exposure to Rh-positive blood

  • Transfusion
  • Bone marrow transplantation
  • Needle-stick injury 

While Rh incompatibility does not typically lead to clinical signs and symptoms in the Rh-negative mother, the consequences on the Rh-positive fetus can be substantial. While the topic of HDN is one that will be discussed elsewhere, some clinical features of HDN secondary to Rh incompatibility include lethargy, pallor, jaundice, scleral icterus, tachycardia, tachypnea, and hypotension. Hydrops fetalis is severe, life-threatening hemolytic anemia (that presents with at least two of the following: edema, pericardial effusions, pleural effusions, ascites) and is associated with a significant mortality rate estimated to be more than 50%. [4][5]

Evaluation

As previously mentioned, Rh incompatibility is centered on the Rh status. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends a Rh(D) blood type and antibody screen for all pregnant women at the initial prenatal visit (grade A). Additionally, the USPSTF recommends repeat antibody testing for all unsensitized Rh-negative mothers at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation, unless the father is Rh-negative (grade B). Antibody testing should also be performed at delivery. There are numerous outcomes after initial testing:

  • If a mother is found to be Rh-positive, there is no risk of alloimmunization regardless of the Rh type of the fetus
  • If the mother is Rh-negative, then alloimmunization can be assessed by an antibody screen
  • If the Rh-negative mother is antibody positive, then a confirmatory study, such as a Coombs test, is needed to direct further management and monitoring of the pregnancy
  • If the Rh-negative mother is antibody negative, paternal Rh testing can be performed as well.

If the father is also Rh-negative, then there is no risk for alloimmunization and complications of Rh incompatibility. On the other hand, a Rh-positive father gives the fetus a 50% risk of having Rh-positive erythrocytes and higher risk for the complications of Rh incompatibility. If the father is Rh-positive or the father’s Rh status cannot be determined, then more invasive testing may be needed.

For Rh-negative mothers that have potentially been exposed to fetal Rh-positive blood, one must assess fetomaternal hemorrhage. This assessment can be done with the rosette test for screening. Positive screens can be confirmed with the Kleihauer-Betke (KB) test or flow cytometry to determine the percentage of fetal blood cells (based on detecting fetal hemoglobin F) in the maternal circulation and the next steps in management.[6]

In a patient’s first affected pregnancy, surveillance of maternal antibody titers is recommended. Titers are repeated every month until 24 weeks of gestation and repeated more frequently in the third trimester. In a patient with a history of HDN, maternal titers are not utilized for determining the appropriate time to initiate fetal surveillance in a subsequent pregnancy. Fetal surveillance includes serial Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) dopplers every 1 to 2 weeks beginning at 24 weeks gestation and antenatal testing beginning at 32 weeks gestation. MCA peak systolic velocity of greater than 1.5 MoM is an indication for cordocentesis to determine fetal hematocrit and the need for intrauterine transfusion. 

Treatment / Management

As alluded to earlier, one of the main principles of the management of Rh incompatibility is the prevention of maternal sensitization. Rh D immunoglobulin (RhIg) has made a significant impact on preventing Rh disease. RhIg consists of anti-Rh D antibodies that target Rh-positive erythrocytes to prevent maternal sensitization. It has reduced the rate of alloimmunization from 16% to less than 1%. Furthermore, RhIg immunoprophylaxis has decreased the prevalence of HDN attributed to anti-D antibodies to less than 1%.

If a mother has the potential to have Rh incompatibility during pregnancy, prophylactic RhIg should be administered to unsensitized Rh-negative women at 28 weeks gestation. If the neonate is found to be Rh-positive after delivery, those same unsensitized Rh-negative women should be given RhIg within 72 hours of delivery. The suggested RhIg dose in the United States is 300 mcg, which should be sufficient in covering up to 15 mL of Rh-positive erythrocytes (i.e., 30 mL of whole fetal blood). In addition, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that all Rh-negative women giving birth to Rh-positive infants should initially undergo a qualitative screening test (rosette assay) and if indicated proceed with quantitative testing (KB test) to determine the correct number of doses of immune globulin required.  

The same principle of RhIg immunoprophylaxis can be applied to Rh-negative mothers who have had high-risk events that could have potentially led to fetomaternal hemorrhage as previously discussed. The recommendations of ACOG for the dosing of RhIg vary depending on the scenario of potential fetomaternal hemorrhage. Smaller doses are considered for events that occur earlier in the pregnancy since the total fetal-placental blood volume is 3 mL (1.5 mL of fetal erythrocytes) at 12 weeks; therefore, at least 50 mcg should be considered for first-trimester events and 300 mcg if after 12 weeks.[7][8]

Pearls and Other Issues

Immunoprophylaxis via RhIg is of value when alloimmunization has not yet occurred. If a Rh-negative mother has been found to have positive anti-D antibody titers, then RhIg treatment will not be effective, and those mothers should not be given RhIg. Accordingly, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists advises routine antibody testing before giving RhIg.

Even with the availability of RhIg for the management of potential Rh incompatibility, the risks of alloimmunization have not been completely eliminated. Contributing factors include inappropriate RhIg administration (i.e., dosing, timeline according to recommendations) and occult fetomaternal bleeding that occurs before the advised RhIg dosing at 28 weeks. Often, the potential source of bleeding cannot be determined.

Most of the discussion of the antibodies involved have been non-specific thus far; however, it is important to make some distinction between the different types of antibodies. If a Rh-negative mother is antibody positive for IgG, this is of clinical concern because IgG antibodies can cross the placenta and cause HDN. However, it is possible that an antibody screen can be positive for IgM antibodies (i.e., Lewis antibodies); however, these are not of clinical consequence since they do not cross the placenta.[9][10]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The obstetrician, maternity nurse, and the labor & Delivery nurse should all be familiar with Rhesus incompatibility. One of the main principles of the management of Rh incompatibility is the prevention of maternal sensitization. Rh D immunoglobulin (RhIg) has made a significant impact on preventing Rh disease. RhIg consists of anti-Rh D antibodies that target Rh-positive erythrocytes to prevent maternal sensitization. It has reduced the rate of alloimmunization from 16% to less than 1%. Furthermore, RhIg immunoprophylaxis has decreased the prevalence of HDN attributed to anti-D antibodies to less than 1%. An interprofessional team approach will diminish complications from this disorder. [Level V]

Questions

To access free multiple choice questions on this topic, click here.

References

1.
Urbaniak SJ, Greiss MA. RhD haemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn. Blood Rev. 2000 Mar;14(1):44-61. [PubMed: 10805260]
2.
Bhutani VK, Zipursky A, Blencowe H, Khanna R, Sgro M, Ebbesen F, Bell J, Mori R, Slusher TM, Fahmy N, Paul VK, Du L, Okolo AA, de Almeida MF, Olusanya BO, Kumar P, Cousens S, Lawn JE. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and Rhesus disease of the newborn: incidence and impairment estimates for 2010 at regional and global levels. Pediatr. Res. 2013 Dec;74 Suppl 1:86-100. [PMC free article: PMC3873706] [PubMed: 24366465]
3.
Zipursky A, Paul VK. The global burden of Rh disease. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011 Mar;96(2):F84-5. [PubMed: 21037283]
4.
Hendrickson JE, Delaney M. Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn: Modern Practice and Future Investigations. Transfus Med Rev. 2016 Oct;30(4):159-64. [PubMed: 27397673]
5.
Czernik C, Proquitté H, Metze B, Bührer C. Hydrops fetalis--has there been a change in diagnostic spectrum and mortality? J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2011 Feb;24(2):258-63. [PubMed: 20446894]
6.
Stroustrup A, Plafkin C, Savitz DA. Impact of physician awareness on diagnosis of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Neonatology. 2014;105(4):250-5. [PMC free article: PMC4012333] [PubMed: 24526231]
7.
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 181: Prevention of Rh D Alloimmunization. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):e57-e70. [PubMed: 28742673]
8.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 75: Management of alloimmunization during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):457-64. [PubMed: 16880320]
9.
Fyfe TM, Ritchey MJ, Taruc C, Crompton D, Galliford B, Perrin R. Appropriate provision of anti-D prophylaxis to RhD negative pregnant women: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Dec 10;14:411. [PMC free article: PMC4265333] [PubMed: 25491600]
10.
de Haas M, Finning K, Massey E, Roberts DJ. Anti-D prophylaxis: past, present and future. Transfus Med. 2014 Feb;24(1):1-7. [PubMed: 25121157]
Copyright © 2020, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, a link is provided to the Creative Commons license, and any changes made are indicated.

Bookshelf ID: NBK459353PMID: 29083656

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...