Table 25aBaseline characteristics of patients in trials in the therapy review: Tachyphylaxis to LABA

Author YearAge (mean±SD)
Males: N (%)
Asthma statusPulmonary function (%predicted FEV1/mean±SD)Max % fall FEV1 (mean±SD)Smoking status: N (%)Atopic status: N (%)ICS history: N (%)
Formoterol vs. placebo
Garcia54 2001F: 22.8±6.1
P: 25.4±5.2
F: 3/10 (30)
P: 5/9 (56)
Stable x 1 mo and throughout trialF: 104.4±19.4
P: 97.7±13.4
Control ECT
F: 21.5±10.0
P: 18.11±10.0
NRNRF: 3/10 (30)
P: 3/9 (33.3)
Salmeterol vs. placebo
Nelson55 199829±8.9
9/20 (45)
Stable but with mixed severity93±13.4Control ECT 24±8.9Non-smokersMixed6/20 (30)
Ramage57 199425.8±5.0
8/12 (66.7)
Stable mild105.7±20.5Placebo ECT 34.8±17.0Non-smokers7/12 (58.3)3/12 (25)
Selvaggio58 2003Range 6–16
NR
NRNRPlacebo ECT 36.6±7.6NRNRNR
Simons59 199713.1±1.3
7/16 (43.8)
Stable93.4±12.7Placebo ECT 24±12NR16/16 (100)16/16 (100)
Salmeterol vs. montelukast
Edelman53 2000Salm: 26; range 15‐ 46
M: 26.5, range 15–46
Salm: 54/94 (57)
M: 46/97 (47)
Stable with range of severitySalm: 88.0±13.5
M: 87.1±11.2
Control ECT
Salm: 36.6±12.3
M: 37.0±11.5
Non-smokers ≥1yrNRNone
Villaran60 1999All: 27±5.4
Salm: 45/95 (47)
M: 53/102 (52)
Stable mildSalm: 87.2±14
M: 86.6±13.7
Control ECT
Salm: 30.5±10.5
M: 33.3±12.1
Past: 170/197 (86)
Never 27/197 (13.7)
NRSalm: 6/95 (6.3)
M: 14/102 (13.7)

ECT = exercise challenge test; F = formoterol; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; M = montelukast; mo = month(s); NR = not reported; P = placebo; salm = salmeterol; SD = standard deviation

From: 3, Results

Cover of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction and Asthma
Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction and Asthma.
Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 189.
Dryden DM, Spooner CH, Stickland MK, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.