Table 16Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy

Author, YearGroupsNOperative Time (min ± SD)Decrease in Hemoglobin/ HematocritBlood Transfusions n (%)Perioperative Complications n (%)* Hospital Stay (mean days ± SD)
Intraoperative Complications n (%)†‡Postoperative Complications n (%)**, ††
Benassi et al., 2002155Vaginal hysterectomy 60 86 ± 25.32 No difference in hemoglobin levels at postoperative day 1 (P= 0.897), or in the difference between pre- and postoperative levels (P = 0.848)2 (3.3) 0 2 (3.3) 3.4 ± 0.7
Abdominal hysterectomy 59 102 ± 31.02 4 (6.8) 0 6 (10.1) 4.3 ± 1.5
P < 0.001P NRNAP = 0.136P < 0.001
Harmanli et al., 2004161Vaginal hysterectomy 88 114.3 ± 46.3 1.9 ± 1.2 (decrease in Hgb) 8 (9.2) Only risk of ileus (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.08–5.43) was significantly higher for women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy compared to vaginal hysterectomy1.9 ± 0.9
Abdominal hysterectomy 200 137.4 ± 69.8 1.6 ± 1.4 (decrease in Hgb) 23 (11.5) 3.7 ± 1.3
P NSP = 0.03P NSP = 0.0001
Taylor et al., 2003166Vaginal hysterectomy 139 172 ± 70.0 7.5 ± 4.6 (decrease in hematocrit) Intraoperative and postoperative transfusion reported separately, no significant differences between groups8 (5.8) 10 (7.2) 2.6 ± 1.5
Abdominal hysterectomy 208 173 ± 66.6 8.3 ± 5.9 (decrease in hematocrit) 16 (7.7) 48 (23.1) 3.9 ± 2.6
P = 0.88P = 0.18P = 0.53; OR, 1.4 (0.6, 3.3)P < 0.001; OR, 3.9 (1.9, 7.9)P < 0.001

CI, confidence interval; Hgb, hemoglobin; min, minutes; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; n, number; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation.

*

Postoperative febrile morbidity, bleeding requiring transfusion, ureteral injury, bladder injury, venous thromboembolism, ileus, hematoma, urinary tract infection, readmission.

Major vessel injury, ureteral injury, bladder injury, bowel injury.

Intraoperative transfusion, conversion to total abdominal hysterectomy, cystotomy, ureteral obstruction, bowel laceration.

**

Vaginal cuff hematoma, pelvic hematoma, wound infection, wound dehiscence.

††

Postoperative transfusion, pelvic hematoma, reoperation, febrile morbidity, other.

From: 3, Results

Cover of Management of Uterine Fibroids
Management of Uterine Fibroids: An Update of the Evidence.
Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 154.
Viswanathan M, Hartmann K, McKoy N, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.