Table 13BUtilization of chiropractic/manipulation in persons with unspecified back pain

Author
Year
Country
Use with Conventional CareConcurrent use with Other CAM
Studies from the United States
Bruce10
2005
U.S.
Not collectedNot reported but data presented indicated respondents had used 1 or more CAM therapy
Cherkin44
2002
U.S.
NSBPNSCAM
Hawk25
2000
U.S.
NSBPNSCAM
Hurwitz29
1997
U.S.
Not reportedNot reported
Shekelle34
1995
U.S.

Shekelle43
1995
U.S.
Not reportedNot reported
Shekelle38
1991
U.S.
Not reportedNot reported
Sherman15
U.S.
2006
Not reportedPhysiotherapeutics (hot, cold, electrical stimulation, ultrasound)
Arizona 5%
Massachusetts 4%
Studies conducted outside the United States
Foltz118
2005
Canada
CAM users reporting visit to:
Any physician: 6.2% (95% CI 6.0–6.4)
GP: 5.1% (95% CI 5.0–5.3)
Specialists: 1.1% (95% CI 1.0–1.2)
PT: 2.4% (95% CI 2.2–2.4)
Psychologists: 0.3% (95% CI 0.3–0.3)
Concurrent use evident but data not stratified by type of CAM therapy
Giles126
2003
Australia
Not reportedNot specified
Ong136
2005
U.K.
Not reported11.4% of respondents had sought osteopathy or D.C. care, and 2% had sought osteopathy or D.C. care and PT care

Abbreviations: CAM = Complementary and Alternative Therapy; D.C. = Doctor of Chiropractic; GP = General Practitioner; NSBP = Data not stratified by back pain; NSCAM = Not stratified by CAM therapy; PT = Physical Therapist

From: 3, Results

Cover of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Back Pain Utilization Report
Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Back Pain Utilization Report.
Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 177.
Santaguida PL, Gross A, Busse J, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.