NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Outdoor air pollution. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2016. (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 109.)
4.3.1. Oxidative stress and inflammation
(a) Pulmonary oxidative stress and inflammation in humans
See Table 4.17.
Table 4.17
Oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate from humans exposed to air pollution.
Studies on oxidative stress in humans who have been exposed to air pollution have mainly applied biomarkers of oxidatively damaged lipids or inflammation markers in exhaled breath or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). The publications are grouped into controlled exposure, panel, and cross-sectional studies.
Among the controlled exposure studies are some that have obtained direct measurements of pulmonary inflammation by analysis of BALF cell counts. The Working Group has included studies on bronchial instillation of PM in humans for the purpose of bridging observations in animal models on the same exposure, although it recognizes that extrapolation to real-life human exposures is challenging. Ghio & Devlin (2001) reported results from a study in which young and healthy people were exposed by bronchial instillation to aqueous extracts of PM10 collected before, during, and after a steel mill strike in Utah Valley, Utah, USA (Ghio & Devlin, 2001). The particles that were collected before and after the strike were associated with higher levels of neutrophils, pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1 beta [IL-1β], tumour necrosis factor [TNF], and IL-8), and protein (a marker of epithelial damage) in the BALF at 24 hours after the instillation of 500 µg of particle extract into the lungs of non-smoking volunteers. Extracts from periods when the steel mill was operating had high concentrations of metals, and the extracts generated ROS in acellular conditions, which was diminished by addition of DFO (a metal chelator) or dimethylthiourea (an antioxidant) (Ghio & Devlin, 2001). Schaumann et al. (2004) instilled into the lungs of 12 healthy volunteers PM2.5 (100 µg, corresponding to 24 hours of inhalation of 100 µg/m3) from two locations in Germany, characterized as being an area with mining and smelter industry and a non-polluted area. The instillation increased the total number of cells in BALF, whereas there was no difference in differential cell counts of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes. Nevertheless, it was only instillation of particles from a polluted area that was associated with increased concentrations of some pro-inflammatory cytokines in BALF (IL-6 and TNF, but not IL-1 and IL-8) and increased ex vivo ROS production in zymosan-stimulated BAL cells. There were unaltered levels of markers of cell damage in the BALF (protein, albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase activity), and the glutathione concentration was unaltered (Schaumann et al., 2004). A study on inhalation exposure to concentrated outdoor particles (23–311 µg/m3) from Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, for 2 hours with moderate exercise (exercise 15 minutes; rest 15 minutes) and analysis of pulmonary inflammation 18 hours after cessation of the exposure showed a mild increase in neutrophils in BALF, whereas there were unaltered levels of IL-6, IL-8, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (Ghio et al., 2000). Another study in 19 healthy non-smoking volunteers from Chapel Hill on outdoor UFP (40 848–205 648 UFP/cm3; 1–50 µg/m3) showed a moderate increase in the concentration of IL-8 in BALF, whereas there were unaltered levels of IL-6 and PGE2 (Samet et al., 2009).
A non-invasive way to study the effect of air pollution is by analysis of markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in exhaled air. As this is a relatively easy method, it has been used in epidemiological studies as well as studies on controlled exposures to air pollution. It was shown that healthy young subjects had elevated levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) after exercise at a location with high traffic-generated UFP (252 290 UFP/cm3) compared with the same type of exercise at a location with less traffic (7382 particles/cm3) (Rundell et al., 2008). This study also showed lower concentrations of exhaled NO and nitrate, which was hypothesized to be due to the formation of peroxynitrite (Rundell et al., 2008). Another study of controlled exposure to elderly men with stable coronary heart disease showed that inhalation of CAPs (190 µg/m3) increased the concentration of 8-isoprostanes in EBC at 6 hours and 24 hours, whereas there was no effect on 3-nitrotyrosine levels (Mills et al., 2008). Exposure to air in a road tunnel in Stockholm, Sweden (80 µg/m3 of PM2.5 for 2 hours), had no effect on exhaled NO in people with asthma, and there were inconsistent associations between exposure and levels of IL-10, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF in nasal lavage fluid (Larsson et al., 2010). Strak et al. (2012) studied subjects who were exposed to outdoor air at a traffic site or an urban site (5 hours, with intermittent exercise); they showed associations between the particle number concentration and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO).
The Beijing Olympics in 2008 has formed the basis for studies on the association between improvements in outdoor air quality and biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation. A study in 125 healthy adults showed that the EBC content of NO, nitrates, nitrites, MDA, and 8-isoprostanes (using an ELISA method) was lower in young and healthy subjects during the Olympics compared with periods before and after the Olympics (Gong et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2012).
Panel studies have typically focused on subjects with lung or cardiovascular diseases. It was shown that there was a positive association between personal PM2.5 exposure and exhaled NO in children (aged 9–13 years) with asthma from Seattle, Washington, USA, who did not take corticosteroid medication (Koenig et al., 2003, 2005; Mar et al., 2005). Another panel study in Ontario, Canada, showed no association between air pollution exposure and FeNO; there was a positive association between levels of air pollution exposure components (PM2.5, NO2, and SO2) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS; an oxidative stress marker) in EBC, which was not a particularly reliable assay for detection of lipid peroxidation products (Liu et al., 2009a). Positive associations between levels of PM2.5 and ozone, based on stationary monitoring data, and MDA levels in EBC were observed in children with asthma in Mexico City (Romieu et al., 2008). A study in elderly subjects with asthma or COPD in Seattle, Washington, USA, showed an association between outdoor concentrations of PM2.5 and FeNO, whereas there was no association between FeNO and personal exposure to PM2.5 (Jansen et al., 2005). In addition, elderly subjects with coronary artery disease in the Los Angeles basin, California, USA had a positive association between exposure markers (PM2.5 and ozone) and FeNO (Delfino et al., 2010a). Studies of healthy children in Steubenville, Ohio, USA, or Mexico City also indicated positive associations between air pollution exposure and FeNO (Adamkiewicz et al., 2004; Barraza-Villarreal et al., 2008), whereas there was no association between levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in EBC and air pollution exposure among students in Christchurch, New Zealand (Epton et al., 2008).
A cross-sectional study of subjects with lung diseases (asthma or COPD) in four European cities showed an association between levels of coarse particles at a central monitoring station and levels of NOx in EBC, whereas there was no association with personal exposure to PM2.5, PM10, or coarse fraction as measured either near or inside the homes (Manney et al., 2012). Another cross-sectional study on children in the Netherlands showed a positive association between PM10 exposure and exhaled NO; children from an urban area had higher nasal lavage levels of IL-8 and NOx compared with children from a suburban area (Steerenberg et al., 2001).
(b) Systemic effects of inflammation in humans
The studies on systemic inflammation have mainly centred on markers of cardiovascular diseases, including acute-phase proteins (fibrinogen and C-reactive protein [CRP]), platelets, von Willebrand factor, haematocrit, whole blood viscosity, and leukocyte counts (Delfino et al., 2005). The measurement of CRP especially has been popular because it is used clinically, it can increase by more than 3 orders of magnitude during an acute-phase response, and it has a relatively short half-life in plasma (~19 hours). A recent review of the association between air pollution levels and CRP levels in humans encompassed a total of 44 publications, stratified into cross-sectional, panel, and randomized cross-over trials (Li et al., 2012). The most important conclusions from that survey were that there was an association between air pollution exposure and elevated levels of CRP in children in cross-sectional studies, whereas there were inconsistent results in adults, which might be related to the inclusion of subjects with prescribed statins or anti-inflammatory drugs. It was also noted that the randomized cross-over trials mainly showed no association between air pollution exposure and CRP levels in plasma, which could be because these studies had few subjects and relatively short exposure duration (Li et al., 2012). One of the studies on controlled exposure used relatively high concentrations of CAPs (190 µg/m3 for 2 hours) and found no change in serum levels of CRP and total leukocyte counts, although there was a transient and marginal increase in the number of monocytes in blood (Mills et al., 2008). In addition, two studies on indoor air filtration for 24–48 hours with relatively low exposure gradients of traffic-generated emissions in Copenhagen, Denmark, showed no effect on levels of CRP, IL-6, TNF, and fibrinogen (Bräuner et al., 2008a, b). A 7-day intervention period with air filtration in homes of a wood smoke-affected area in British Columbia, Canada, found an association between the indoor concentration of fine particles and CRP levels, whereas there was no association with IL-6 levels (Allen et al., 2011).
The production of CRP is regulated in response to elevated levels of IL-6, IL-1, and TNF. A study indicated that children in Mexico City, compared with children in a low-pollution city, had a systemic pro-inflammatory state as determined by elevated plasma/serum levels of TNF, IL-1β, PGE2, and CRP (Calderón-Garcidueñas et al., 2008). A very large study of subjects in Lausanne, Switzerland, with 6183 adult participants showed associations between short-term exposures to PM10 and elevated levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF, whereas there was no effect on CRP levels (Tsai et al., 2012). Other studies of people with coronary artery disease also found associations between exposure to small particles (PM0.25) and levels of CRP, IL-6, and TNF in plasma (Delfino et al., 2008, 2009, 2010b). A study in Singapore showed that subjects had elevated serum levels of TNF, IL-1β, and IL-6 during a period with haze, with high outdoor air pollution concentrations (PM10, 125 µg/m3), compared with a period afterwards with a low air pollution level (PM10, 14 µg/m3) (van Eeden et al., 2001). However, there are also studies showing inconsistent associations between air pollution exposure and levels of CRP, IL-6, IL-8, serum amyloid A, and fibrinogen (Huttunen et al., 2012; Rückerl et al., 2006, 2007; Strak et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2012) or no association with levels of CRP, IL-6, IL-10, TNF, and fibrinogen (Liu et al., 2007, 2009b; Zuurbier et al., 2011).
Studies on oxidative stress biomarkers in biomonitoring include oxidation products of lipids, proteins, and DNA. Several studies of these products from areas in the Czech Republic have shown positive associations between air pollution exposure and oxidative stress markers (Bagryantseva et al., 2010; Rossner et al., 2007, 2011c, 2013b).
(c) Pulmonary inflammation and ROS production in experimental systems
(i) Pulmonary inflammation in experimental animals
Numerous studies have assessed pulmonary inflammation in animals after exposure to urban air particles (see Supplemental Table S20, available online). Notably, there is a clear effect on pulmonary inflammation after both inhalation and instillation exposure. This is observed by an increased number of leukocytes in BALF or elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Increased inflammation has been observed after inhalation of CAPs from Bilthoven (Netherlands), Boston (Massachusetts, USA), Tuxedo (New York, USA), and Manhattan (New York, USA), with concentration ranges of approximately 100–1200 µg/m3 (Cassee et al., 2005; Clarke et al., 1999, 2000a, b; Gordon et al., 1998; Rhoden et al., 2004; Saldiva et al., 2002; Shukla et al., 2000).
Studies in mice intratracheally instilled with EHC93 (1 mg/mouse) have shown that the soluble fraction of the total dust sample was more inflammogenic than the insoluble fraction (Adamson et al., 1999a). Especially the content of zinc was found to be an important contributor to the inflammogenicity, although redox-active transition metals also had some effect on the inflammation response after intratracheal instillation of EHC93 (1 mg/mouse) (Adamson et al., 2000). The intratracheal instillation of SRM 1648 (1.6 mg/lung) in mice has also been associated with pulmonary inflammation in terms of increased concentrations of IL-6, TNF, and MIP2 in BALF (Becher et al., 2007).
Another study of PM from Duisburg (Germany), Prague (Czech Republic), Amsterdam (Netherlands), Helsinki (Finland), Barcelona (Spain), and Athens (Greece) showed that the coarse particles were more inflammogenic than the fine particles by intratracheal instillation (1–10 mg/kg for 4, 12, or 24 hours) in mice (Happo et al., 2007). Other studies also have indicated that coarse particles instilled intratracheally (100 µg/mouse) were more inflammogenic than fine particles (Farina et al., 2011). In addition to the potency of particles with different sizes, the studies in Europe have also revealed both temporal and spatial variation in the potency of PM (Farina et al., 2011; Happo et al., 2007).
Other studies on differences between particles have shown that desert dust from Arizona, USA, or Shapotou, China, was associated with pulmonary inflammation after instillation of 0.1 mg/mouse 4 times over 8 weeks (Ichinose et al., 2008). Instillation of 32–100 µg/mouse of residual oil fly ash (ROFA) or SRM 1649 was associated with a higher degree of pulmonary inflammation than the same dose of World Trade Center fine particles (Gavett et al., 2003).
A few studies have used intranasal instillation, showing that PM2.5 from the air in São Paulo (Brazil), PM from Buenos Aires (Argentina), or CAPs from Boston (Massachusetts, USA) increased the level of pulmonary inflammation (Martin et al., 2007; Martin et al., 2010; Riva et al., 2011; Sigaud et al., 2007).
Experimental studies also indicate that the pulmonary inflammation depends on oxidative stress, as indicated by a study where mice with overexpression of SOD compared with wild-type counterparts had lower levels of neutrophils, TNF, and MIP2 in BALF after an intratracheal instillation of 50 µg/mouse (Ghio et al., 2002). Similarly, pre-treatment with antioxidants decreased the level of particle-mediated pulmonary inflammation after the intratracheal instillation (10–100 µg/mouse) of urban air PM (Dick et al., 2003).
A study in Porto Alegre, Brazil, with relatively high outdoor particle concentrations (110–140 µg/m3), showed increased pulmonary inflammation in rats (Pereira et al., 2007). However, it has also been reported that exposure to CAPs from Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA (493 µg/m3, 8 hours/day for 13 days), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA (475–907 µg/m3, 6 hours/day for 2–3 days), or Bilthoven, Netherlands (399–3612 µg/m3, 6 hours/day for 2 days) was not associated with pulmonary inflammation in rats (Heidenfelder et al., 2009; Kodavanti et al., 2000; Kooter et al., 2006). The exposure concentrations do not appear to be different between the studies with null effect and studies that have shown pulmonary inflammation. A study on short-term inhalation exposure to EHC93 (57 µg/m3 for 4 hours) was associated with an increased number of neutrophils in the air space and tissue of rats (Adamson et al., 1999b). Likewise, there was an increased level of pulmonary inflammation after inhalation (12 mg/m3 for 6 hours) of ROFA or the corresponding dose administered by intratracheal instillation (110 µg/rat) (Costa et al., 2006). The effect on pulmonary inflammation was highest at 24 hours after the exposure, and it decreased gradually over the next 72 hours (Costa et al., 2006).
Relatively high bolus dose instillations of EHC93 (5–10 mg/kg) have indicated a bell-shaped response in regard to the number of cells in BALF, with the highest effect at 24–48 hours, whereas time points before (4 hours) and after (days 4–7) indicated lower effects on pulmonary inflammation (Bagate et al., 2004; Gerlofs-Nijland et al., 2005; Ulrich et al., 2002). Intratracheal instillation of the water-soluble fraction of TSP from Provo, Utah, USA, was associated with higher levels of neutrophils in BALF compared with instillation of the insoluble fraction of particles (Ghio et al., 1999).
A study of particles that were collected in Amsterdam (Netherlands), Lodz (Poland), Oslo (Norway), and Rome (Italy) showed that fine particles were more inflammogenic than coarse particles on a mass basis in rats by intratracheal instillation (Halatek et al., 2011). This study also revealed seasonal variability of particles for the influx of neutrophils in BALF, especially in Oslo, whereas the levels of TNF and MIP2 in BALF depended on both the season and the location (Halatek et al., 2011). However, another study of intratracheal instillation in spontaneously hypersensitive rats of particles (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) collected in Munich (Germany), Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht (Netherlands), Dordrecht (Netherlands), Rome (Italy), and Lycksele (Sweden) showed that coarse particles were more inflammogenic than fine particles (Gerlofs-Nijland et al., 2007). Coarse particles were shown to be more inflammogenic than fine particles by intratracheal instillation in rats (Schins et al., 2004). Also, both temporal and spatial variation in the potency of PM has been shown (Gerlofs-Nijland et al., 2007; Halatek et al., 2011). A study in Beijing, China, showed higher levels of TNF, IL-6, and IL-1 in lung homogenate after intratracheal instillation of PM2.5 compared with the same dose of PM10 (7.5 mg/kg), and particles collected closest to traffic generated the highest level of inflammation (Zhang et al., 2011). Intratracheal instillation of ROFA (500 µg/rat) was associated with increased levels of neutrophils in BALF as well as elevated levels of IL-6, TNF, CCL2, and IL-1β (Roberts et al., 2003).
Collectively, there is compelling evidence for an association between exposure to air pollution particles and pulmonary inflammation in experimental animals.
(ii) ROS production in experimental animals
Relatively few studies have undertaken analysis of ROS production in vivo after pulmonary exposure. Inhalation of CAPs (300 µg/m3 for 5 hours) or ROFA (1.7 mg/m3 for 30 minutes) was associated with increased production of ROS in lung tissue, assessed by chemiluminescence (Gurgueira et al., 2002). Another study exposed rats to oil fly ash (500 µg/rat) by intratracheal instillation and subsequently injected 4-POBN (a spin trap) in the peritoneum at 1 hour before the rats were killed. Lung homogenates from exposed rats showed the presence of carbon-centred alkyl radicals, which were suspected to have been derived from peroxidation of lipids (Kadiiska et al., 2004).
(iii) Markers of inflammation in cultured cells
Studies on markers of inflammatory responses in cultured cells, summarized in Supplemental Table S21 (available online), evaluated a variety of cytokines. A substantial number of studies have documented increased levels of biomarkers of inflammation, in regard to cytokines, chemokines, and production of NO in various cell lines or primary cell cultures from rodents after exposure to authentic air pollution particles or model particles such as EHC93, SRM 1648, SRM 1649, or ROFA (Auger et al., 2006; Baulig et al., 2003; Becher et al., 2007; Brown et al., 2004, 2007; Fujii et al., 2001, 2002; Garçon et al., 2006; Jalava et al., 2005; Karlsson et al., 2006; Schneider et al., 2005; van Eeden et al., 2001; Watterson et al., 2007). Exposure of lung epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages in co-cultures to ROFA or SRM 1649 increased the secretion of MIP2 and TNF. This effect was not observed in lung epithelial cells or alveolar macrophages in mono-cultures (Tao & Kobzik, 2002). Higher levels of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β were also observed in A549/THP-1 in co-cultures compared with THP-1 mono-cultures after exposure to PM samples from Milan, Italy (Longhin et al., 2013).
Collectively, there is compelling evidence that exposure to PM in cultured cells is associated with inflammatory reactions, assessed mainly as secretion of cytokines and chemokines, which may be elicited secondary to oxidative stress in the cells. This association between exposure to PM and secretion of cytokines is observed especially in lung epithelial cells and macrophages. The inflammation potential seems to be higher for coarse particles compared with fine particles, which is likely to be related to the content of endotoxin in the coarse fraction. There is also some experimental evidence linking the inflammation reaction in cultured cells to oxidative stress and metal-catalysed ROS production, although it should be noted that the observations are mixed and the linkage between oxidative stress and inflammation might depend on both the physical–chemical properties of PM samples and their constituents.
(iv) ROS production in cultured cells
Studies on ROS production in cultured cells are summarized in Supplemental Table S22 (available online). It has been shown that exposure to air pollution particles was associated with intracellular ROS production, detected as oxidation products of 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCFH) or dihydroethidium, or chemiluminescence in different human cells (Auger et al., 2006; Baulig et al., 2003; Becker et al., 1996, 2005; Goldsmith et al., 1997; Kamdar et al., 2008; Karlsson et al., 2008; Ohyama et al., 2007; Shukla et al., 2000; Yi et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2008). Model particles such as SRM 1648, SRM 1649, EHC93, and various types of fly ashes have also been associated with intracellular ROS production (Baulig et al., 2003; Becher et al., 2007, Becker et al., 1996, 2005; Di Pietro et al., 2009; Dwivedi et al., 2012; Li et al., 2006; Schneider et al., 2005).
A few studies have assessed the ROS production potential of EOM in cultured cells. This revealed increased ROS production by extracts from both urban and rural sites in MCF-7 cells (Chen et al., 2013), PM10 from an industrial area in HepG2 cells (Jiang et al., 2011), and road tunnel particles in A549 cells (Shang et al., 2013).
Collectively, there is compelling evidence for intracellular ROS production in cells exposed to PM.
(v) Acellular ROS production
Studies on acellular ROS production are summarized in Supplemental Table S23 (available online). ROS can be detected by electron spin resonance (ESR) signals, which are typically obtained in experimental conditions with H2O2 as co-oxidant and 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) as spin trap, indicating that the assay depends mainly on the presence of transition metals in the samples (Knaapen et al., 2002; Valavanidis et al., 2000, 2005). This is supported by observations that coal fly ash produced ROS, which correlated with the release of iron (Dwivedi et al., 2012; van Maanen et al., 1999). Nevertheless, other transition metals can be the dominant source of ROS production, which has been observed for PM2.5 samples that were collected in the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA (Shen et al., 2011; Shen & Anastasio 2011, 2012). In addition, treatment with DFO, catalase, or antioxidants (DMSO or dimethylthiourea) diminished the ROS production of air pollution particles measured by ESR or other assays, such as oxidation products of DCFH or deoxyribose (Ball et al., 2000; Frampton et al., 1999; Ghio & Devlin, 2001; Imrich et al., 2007; Knaapen et al., 2002; Lindbom et al., 2007).
Collectively, there is strong evidence that PM generates ROS in suspensions by at least two mechanisms, encompassing transition metal catalysis or redox cycling by quinones.
In summary, controlled short-term inhalation exposures to CAPs or instillation of PM from especially urban areas in Europe and the USA have been associated with increased levels of pulmonary inflammation and oxidative stress. These observations are supported by results from cross-sectional and panel studies that show signs of pulmonary inflammation, whereas there are only few studies on oxidative stress end-points. There is strong evidence for pulmonary inflammation in animals after either inhalation or intratracheal instillation (or similar ways of exposure) of PM from urban air in Argentina, Brazil, China, Europe, and the USA. Aqueous suspensions of PM from urban areas in China, Europe, Japan, and the USA have been associated with increased ROS production in cultured cells. Organic extracts of PM from cities in China have likewise increased the intracellular ROS production. Aqueous suspensions of PM from urban areas, mainly in Europe and the USA, have promoted inflammation reactions in cultured macrophages or airway epithelial cells. A few studies on PM from China, Mexico, and Senegal also indicate inflammation in cultured cells. In comparison, very few studies have assessed the effect of organic extracts of PM on inflammation, and the results have been mixed. Aqueous suspensions of PM from urban areas, mainly in Europe and the USA, have been shown to generate ROS production in acellular conditions.
4.3.2. Non-cancer effects
Exposure to current-day concentrations of outdoor air pollution has been linked with a variety of non-cancer health effects ranging in severity from subclinical physiological changes to mortality, particularly involving cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, with evidence of additional effects on immunological, reproductive, and other systems (American Thoracic Society, 2000; WHO, 2006; Samet & Krewski, 2007) (see Supplemental Figure S3, available online) Exposure to outdoor particulate air pollution has been estimated to have contributed 3.2 million premature deaths and 74.4 million lost years of healthy life worldwide in 2010, due to cardiovascular disease, COPD, and acute lower respiratory infections, in addition to lung cancer (Lim et al., 2012). Although mortality and hospitalization have been the most studied effects of air pollution and have important public health impacts, the number of people affected by less-severe effects is larger (WHO, 2006).
(a) Cardiorespiratory effects
The cardiovascular and respiratory effects of outdoor air pollution have been examined in many studies worldwide using diverse research designs and are summarized in numerous reviews and regulatory documents (e.g. Brook, 2008; Brook et al., 2010; EPA, 2006; Hoek et al., 2013; Lai et al., 2013; WHO, 2006). The effects of airborne PM have been most extensively studied. Exposure to PM is linked with increases in all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality, as well as with other cardiovascular and respiratory effects, including hospitalization for acute respiratory events, decreased lung function, ischaemic events, stroke, arrhythmia, and reduced heart rate variability (Brook, 2008; Hoek et al., 2013; Pieters et al., 2012; Samet & Krewski, 2007; WHO, 2006). Positive associations have also been observed between exposure to NOx and mortality from all causes and ischaemic health disease (Hoek et al., 2013; Mustafic et al., 2012). However, because NO2 is closely correlated with other air pollutants from traffic-related sources, it is difficult to determine whether the effects are due specifically to NO2, to other air pollutants, or to the complex mixture of pollutants (WHO, 2006).
(b) Reproductive effects
Prenatal exposure to air pollution has been hypothesized to affect the unborn child through several mechanisms, including oxidative stress, inflammatory processes, endocrine disruption, and germ-cell changes (Schwartz, 2004; Slama et al., 2008). Research on this topic is still inconclusive, but there is some evidence that prenatal exposure to outdoor air pollution increases the risk of preterm delivery, fetal growth deficit, and cardiac birth deficit (Wigle et al., 2008). A meta-analysis based on 62 studies estimated that exposure to PM, NO2, and CO during pregnancy was associated with low birth weight and that exposure to PM and CO was associated with preterm birth (Stieb et al., 2012). Another systematic review of air pollution exposures and birth outcomes reported similar conclusions regarding low birth weight and preterm birth, as well as associations of small-for-gestational-age births with prenatal exposure to PM and of preterm birth with exposure to SO2 (Shah & Balkhair, 2011). Transcriptomics allows for more mechanistic and holistic studies by analysing several genes that are upregulated or downregulated in exposed populations, for example as performed in the well-characterized Czech populations, including gene profiling of newborns (Šrám et al., 2013). These studies are explorative.
(c) Immunotoxic effects
Associations between exposures to outdoor air pollution and biomarkers of immunotoxicity associated with inflammatory responses, for example cytokines, have been reported in several studies.
(d) Endocrine effects
Statistically significant associations between long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution at the residence and diabetes mortality were reported in a Danish follow-up study of 52 061 cohort participants (Raaschou-Nielsen et al., 2013a). An association of type 2 diabetes in women with traffic-related air pollution measured by NO2 has also been reported (Brook et al., 2008). Urinary excretion of 17-ketosteroids and 17-hydroxycorticosteroids, markers of adrenal cortex functions, was reported to be significantly lower in male children living in polluted areas compared with children living in clean areas (Watanabe, 2000), but the paper lacks important details about the study population.
4.3.3. Genotoxic and other deleterious effects on germ cells
Several lines of evidence have suggested that air pollution may cause deleterious effects to germ cells in wildlife, experimental animals, and humans (reviewed in Samet et al., 2004; Somers & Cooper, 2009; Somers, 2011). The studies of outdoor air pollution-induced genetic effects in germ cells are summarized in Table 4.18 and Supplemental Table S24 (available online).
Table 4.18
Genotoxic effects in germ cells of humans exposed to polluted outdoor air.
(a) DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations in human sperm
See Table 4.18.
Several studies in the Czech Republic have evaluated the association of outdoor air pollution exposure with chromatin damage in humans by SCSA. A preliminary study showed an increased percentage of sperm with abnormal chromatin structure (denatured DNA susceptibility) (expressed as COMPαt, cells outside the main population of cells) at periods of high air pollution in Teplice (Selevan et al., 2000). High COMPαt (> 30) has been associated with infertility and spontaneous abortion (Evenson et al., 1999). A subsequent 2-year follow-up study confirmed that there was a significant association between exposure to periods of air pollution and the increased DNA damage in human sperm; however, there was no association between aneuploidy in sperm and outdoor air pollution (Rubes et al., 2005). Rubes et al. also showed that men with the GSTM1 null genotype exhibited increased susceptibility to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure (Rubes et al., 2007). Furthermore, significantly higher sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) values were observed in the winter compared with in the spring for police officers working outdoors in Prague (Rubes et al., 2010). A study in male traffic police in Prague showed that they had higher frequencies of aneuploidy in their sperm when sampled in January, when the PM10 concentrations were high, compared with in March, when the PM10 concentrations were low (Rubes et al., 1996; Srám et al., 1999).
(b) Mutations in male germ cells and the germline in animals
Studies of sentinel wildlife and laboratory rodents exposed to outdoor air (summarized in Supplemental Table S24, available online) have provided evidence for elevated germline mutation induced by air pollution (Somers & Cooper, 2009; Somers, 2011). Increased rates of germline mutations at minisatellite loci (tandem repetitive DNA loci) were seen in herring gulls (Larus argentatus) collected from industrial areas with high levels of air pollution, and minisatellite mutation rates decreased with increasing distance from the industrial coking oven and urbanization site (Yauk & Quinn, 1996; Yauk et al., 2000). When laboratory mice were exposed to outdoor air in a polluted industrial area near steel mills, a significant 1.5–2.0-fold elevation in heritable mutation frequency in the offspring was observed, primarily through ESTR mutation events in the paternal germline (Somers et al., 2002). This heritable mutation frequency was significantly reduced when mice were exposed in situ to air from a polluted area treated by a HEPA filtration system that removed 99.97% of particles 0.3 µm in diameter (Somers et al., 2004). [The Working Group noted that airborne PM was an important factor in induction of germline ESTR mutations.] Taken together, the series of studies indicate that exposure to outdoor air pollution could cause damage to male gametes, as shown in observed germline mutations and DNA damage in sperm of mice, although their contributions to fertility and reproduction are still unknown.
(c) Sperm abnormality in animals
In a sperm morphology study of mice treated with extracts of air samples collected in Shanghai, China, an increased frequency of germ-cell deformations was observed for most sites in the winter (Mao et al., 1993). A subsequent animal experimental study in Taiyuan, China, showed that intraperitoneal treatment of male Kunming mice with particle extracts from the residential area downwind of a coal combustion power plant induced sperm abnormality, CAs of spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes, and MN in spermatids (Sun et al., 1995). Elevated frequencies of head and tail deformities in the sperm were observed in feral mice living in an area with air highly polluted by automobile traffic in Rome, Italy (Ieradi et al., 1996).
In summary, a series of studies in humans, wildlife, and experimental animals indicate that outdoor air pollution might cause heritable mutations, sperm abnormalities, and germ-cell DNA damage. The evidence for heritable mutation derives from studies examining gulls as well as inbred and outbred mice.
4.3.4. Oncogenic cell transformation
Studies that used cultured animal cells to assess the ability of outdoor air to induce malignant cell transformation are summarized in Supplemental Table S25 (available online). Several such studies have demonstrated that organic extracts of urban air PM can induce oncogenic transformation of cultured animal cells. Moreover, some studies have demonstrated that the resultant transformed cells can form malignant tumours in vivo.
- Other data relevant to carcinogenicity - Outdoor air pollutionOther data relevant to carcinogenicity - Outdoor air pollution
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...