U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

First Initiative Peritoneal Dialysis versus Hemodialysis for the Treatment of Renal Failure: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2016 Feb 8.

Cover of First Initiative Peritoneal Dialysis versus Hemodialysis for the Treatment of Renal Failure: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

First Initiative Peritoneal Dialysis versus Hemodialysis for the Treatment of Renal Failure: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines [Internet].

Show details

METHODS

Literature Search Methods

A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) databases, Canadian and major international health technology agencies, as well as a focused Internet search. To address research question one, methodological filters were applied to limit retrieval to health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. In addition, a focused search for non-randomized studies was conducted wherein main concepts appeared in title or major subject heading and a non-randomized studies filter was applied. To address research questions two and three, methodological filters were applied to limit retrieval to guidelines. Where possible, retrieval was limited to the human population. The search was also limited to English language documents published between January 1, 2011 and January 8, 2016.

Rapid Response reports are organized so that the evidence for each research question is presented separately.

Selection Criteria and Methods

One reviewer screened citations and selected studies. In the first level of screening, titles and abstracts were reviewed and potentially relevant articles were retrieved and assessed for inclusion. The final selection of full-text articles was performed by a second reviewer based on the inclusion criteria presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Selection Criteria.

Table 1

Selection Criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

Articles were excluded if they did not meet the selection criteria outlined in Table 1, they were duplicate publications, or were published prior to 2011.

Critical Appraisal of Individual Studies

All the included studies had non-randomized designs and they were critically appraised using the Downs and Black checklist for measuring study quality.8 Summary scores were not calculated for the included studies; rather, a review of the strengths and limitations of each included study were described narratively. The strengths and limitations of the individual studies are summarized in Appendix 3.

Copyright © 2015 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

Copyright: This report contains CADTH copyright material and may contain material in which a third party ow ns copyright. This report may be used for the purposes of research or private study only. It may not be copied, posted on a web site, redistributed by email or stored on an electronic system without the prior written permission of CADTH or applicable copyright owner.

Links: This report may contain links to other information available on the websites of third parties on the Internet. CADTH does not have control over the content of such sites. Use of third party sites is governed by the owners’ own terms and conditions.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Bookshelf ID: NBK343878

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (458K)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...