Table 4Summary of the strength of evidence: iso-osmolar contrast media versus low-osmolar contrast media

OutcomeRCTs (N)Study LimitationsDirectnessConsistencyPrecisionStrength of Evidence*Summary of Key Outcomes
Development of CIN25 (5,097)MediumDirectConsistentPreciseModerateModerate strength of evidence that IOCM had a slightly lower risk of CIN than LOCM; the point estimate of this reduction did not exceed a minimally important relative risk difference of 25% and is unlikely to be clinically important.
Development of CIN (IV administration)6 (790)MediumDirectConsistentImpreciseLowLow strength of evidence that IV IOCM had a slightly lower risk of CIN than IV LOCM; the point estimate of this reduction did not exceed a minimally important relative risk difference of 25% and is unlikely to be clinically important.
Development of CIN (IA administration)18 (4,194)MediumDirectConsistentPreciseModerateModerate strength of evidence that IA IOCM had a slightly lower risk of CIN than IA LOCM; the point estimate of this reduction did not exceed a minimally important relative risk difference of 25% and is unlikely to be clinically important.
Need for RRT5 (1,740)MediumDirectConsistentImpreciseLowLow strength of evidence that the need for RRT does not differ between IOCM and LOCM.
Cardiovascular outcomes7 (2,258)MediumDirectConsistentImpreciseLowLow strength of evidence that cardiovascular outcomes do not differ between IOCM and LOCM.
Mortality8 (2,028)MediumDirectConsistentImpreciseLowLow strength of evidence that mortality does not differ between IOCM and LOCM.
Adverse events12 (3,363)MediumDirectConsistentImpreciseLowLow strength of evidence that adverse event rates do not differ between IOCM and LOCM.

CIN = contrast induced nephropathy; IA = intra-arterial; IOCM = iso-osmolar contrast medium; IV = intravenous; LOCM = low-osmolar contrast medium; NA = not assessed; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RRT = renal replacement therapy

*

Due to heterogeneity in the study limitations across studies, the median study limitation value was chosen when distribution across studies was normal. In the instance where there is a split between study limitation scores, the more conservative study limitation designation was chosen.

From: Results

Cover of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: Comparative Effects of Different Contrast Media [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 155.
Eng J, Subramaniam RM, Wilson RF, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.