NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
The past half-century has witnessed a dramatic increase in the scale and complexity of scientific research. The growing scale of science has been accompanied by a shift toward collaborative research, referred to as “team science.“ Scientific research is increasingly conducted by small teams and larger groups rather than individual investigators, but the challenges of collaboration can slow these teams' progress in achieving their scientific goals. How does a team-based approach work, and how can universities and research institutions support teams?
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science synthesizes and integrates the available research to provide guidance on assembling the science team; leadership, education and professional development for science teams and groups. It also examines institutional and organizational structures and policies to support science teams and identifies areas where further research is needed to help science teams and groups achieve their scientific and translational goals. This report offers major public policy recommendations for science research agencies and policymakers, as well as recommendations for individual scientists, disciplinary associations, and research universities. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science will be of interest to university research administrators, team science leaders, science faculty, and graduate and postdoctoral students.
Contents
- THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
- COMMITTEE ON THE SCIENCE OF TEAM SCIENCE
- BOARD ON BEHAVIORAL, COGNITIVE, AND SENSORY SCIENCES
- Acknowledgments
- Summary
- I. Setting the Stage
- II. The Individual and Team Levels
- 3. Overview of the Research on Team Effectiveness
- 4. Team Composition and Assembly
- 5. Professional Development and Education for Team Science
- 6. Team Science Leadership
- DEFINING LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
- RESEARCH FINDINGS ON GENERAL LEADERSHIP AND POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR TEAM LEADERSHIP
- RESEARCH FINDINGS ON TEAM LEADERSHIP
- RESEARCH FINDINGS ON TEAM SCIENCE LEADERSHIP
- LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR TEAM SCIENCE LEADERS
- ADDRESSING THE SEVEN FEATURES THAT CREATE CHALLENGES FOR TEAM SCIENCE
- SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION
- III. The Institutional and Organizational Level
- 7. Supporting Virtual Collaboration
- SPECIAL CHALLENGES FOR GEOGRAPHICALLY DISPERSED LARGER GROUPS OR TEAMS
- INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS TO MEET THE CHALLENGES
- LEADERSHIP STRATEGIES TO MEET THE CHALLENGES
- HOW ORGANIZATIONS CAN SUPPORT VIRTUAL COLLABORATION
- TECHNOLOGY TO SUPPORT VIRTUAL COLLABORATION
- HOW TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL PRACTICES CAN ADDRESS THE CHALLENGES OF VIRTUAL COLLABORATION
- SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 8. Institutional and Organizational Support for Team Science
- 9. Funding and Evaluation of Team Science
- 7. Supporting Virtual Collaboration
- IV. A Path Forward
- References
- Appendix Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
This study was supported by the National Science Foundation under Contract No. OCI-1248170 and by Elsevier. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.
Suggested citation:
National Research Council. (2015). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Committee on the Science of Team Science, N.J. Cooke and M.L. Hilton, Editors. Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.[Am Psychol. 2018]Review The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.Hall KL, Vogel AL, Huang GC, Serrano KJ, Rice EL, Tsakraklides SP, Fiore SM. Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun; 73(4):532-548.
- Scientific Training in the Era of Big Data: A New Pedagogy for Graduate Education.[Big Data. 2017]Scientific Training in the Era of Big Data: A New Pedagogy for Graduate Education.Aikat J, Carsey TM, Fecho K, Jeffay K, Krishnamurthy A, Mucha PJ, Rajasekar A, Ahalt SC. Big Data. 2017 Mar; 5(1):12-18. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary: Enhancing Opportunities for Training and Retention of a Diverse Biomedical Workforce.[Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016]National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary: Enhancing Opportunities for Training and Retention of a Diverse Biomedical Workforce.Duncan GA, Lockett A, Villegas LR, Almodovar S, Gomez JL, Flores SC, Wilkes DS, Tigno XT. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr; 13(4):562-7.
- Advice for running a successful research team.[Nurse Res. 2015]Advice for running a successful research team.Stanley D, Anderson J. Nurse Res. 2015 Nov; 23(2):36-40.
- Review An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all.[J Clin Transl Sci. 2021]Review An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all.Begerowski SR, Traylor AM, Shuffler ML, Salas E. J Clin Transl Sci. 2021; 5(1):e198. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
- Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team ScienceEnhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...