NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Chemical Agents and Related Occupations. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012. (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 100F.)

Cover of Chemical Agents and Related Occupations

Chemical Agents and Related Occupations.

Show details

ETHYLENE OXIDE

Ethylene oxide was considered by previous IARC Working Groups in 1976, 1984, 1987, 1994, and 2007 (IARC, 1976, 1985, 1987, 1994, 2008). Since that time new data have become available, which have been incorporated in this Monograph, and taken into consideration in the present evaluation.

1. Exposure Data

1.1. Identification of the agent

From IARC (2008), unless indicated otherwise

  • Chem. Abstr. Serv. Reg. No.: 75-21-8
  • Chem. Abstr. Serv. Name: Oxirane
  • Synonyms: 1,2-Epoxyethane

Image 978-9283201380-C028-F001.jpg

  • C2H4O
  • Relative molecular mass: 44.06
  • Description: Colourless, flammable gas (O’Neill, 2006)
  • Boiling-point: 10.6 °C (Lide, 2008)
  • Solubility: Soluble in water, acetone, benzene, diethyl ether, and ethanol (Lide, 2008)
  • Conversion factor: mg/m3 = 1.80 × ppm; calculated from: mg/m3 = (relative molecular weight/24.45) × ppm, assuming standard temperature (25 °C) and pressure (101.3 kPa).

1.2. Uses

Ethylene oxide is an important raw material used in the manufacture of chemical derivatives that are the basis for major consumer goods in virtually all industrialized countries. More than half of the ethylene oxide produced worldwide is used in the manufacture of mono-ethylene glycol. Conversion of ethylene oxide to ethylene glycols represents a major use for ethylene oxide in most regions: North America (65%), western Europe (44%), Japan (63%), China (68%), Other Asia (94%), and the Middle East (99%). Important derivatives of ethylene oxide include di-ethylene glycol, tri-ethylene glycol, poly(ethylene) glycols, ethylene glycol ethers, ethanol-amines, and ethoxylation products of fatty alcohols, fatty amines, alkyl phenols, cellulose and poly(propylene) glycol (Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2005; Devanney, 2010).

A very small proportion (0.05%) of the annual production of ethylene oxide is used directly in the gaseous form as a sterilizing agent, fumigant and insecticide, either alone or in non-explosive mixtures with nitrogen, carbon dioxide or dichlorofluoromethane (Dever et al., 2004). It is used to sterilize drugs, hospital equipment, disposable and reusable medical items, packaging materials, foods, books, museum artefacts, scientific equipment, clothing, furs, railcars, aircraft, beehives and other items (Lacson, 2003).

1.3. Human exposure

1.3.1. Occupational exposure

Most of the data on occupational exposure are related to the production of ethylene oxide and its use in industrial and hospital sterilization. Data were not available on exposures that are incurred outside North America and Europe, where almost half of the global amount of ethylene oxide is produced (IARC, 2008).

CAREX (CARcinogen EXposure) is an international information system on occupational exposure to known and suspected carcinogens, with data collected from 1990 to 1993 in the European Union (EU). The CAREX database provides selected exposure data and documented estimates of the number of exposed workers by country, carcinogen, and industry (Kauppinen et al., 2000). Table 1.1 presents the results for ethylene oxide for the top-10 industries in the EU (CAREX, 1999). From the US National Occupational Exposure Survey (1981–1983), it was estimated that approximately 270 000 workers (including approximately 120 000 women) in the USA were potentially exposed to ethylene oxide (NIOSH, 1990).

Table 1.1. Estimated numbers of workers exposed to ethylene oxide in the European Union (top 10 industries).

Table 1.1

Estimated numbers of workers exposed to ethylene oxide in the European Union (top 10 industries).

More recent data on employment in the industrial sectors that use ethylene oxide have been published by the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2005). Estimated employment figures were: 1100 ethylene oxide-production workers, 4000 ethoxylators, who use ethylene oxide to make chemical derivatives, and 40 000 workers using ethylene oxide as a sterilant or fumigant in hospitals. In addition, approximately 2700 workers were employed in commercial sterilization by manufacturers of medical and pharmaceutical products and producers of food spices, as contract sterilizers, and in other sterilization and fumigation facilities (IARC, 2008).

(a) Production of ethylene oxide and its derivatives

The IARC Monographs Volumes 60 and 97 provide detailed descriptions of studies on historical occupational exposures to ethylene oxide (IARC, 1994, 2008).

Table 1.2 (available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100F/100F-23-Table1.2.pdf) summarizes reported exposure levels in industries where ethylene oxide and its derivatives are manufactured. Exposures vary with job category: workers involved in loading and distribution of ethylene oxide have the highest exposure. Where comparisons over time are possible, exposures appear to have decreased, presumably as control measures have been improved, with the most recent time-weighted average (TWA) values in the range of 1 ppm or less. Exposure to a large variety of chemicals other than ethylene oxide may occur, depending on the types of industrial process and job. These other chemicals include unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons (e.g. ethylene, propylene), other epoxides (e.g. propylene oxide), chlorohydrins (e.g. epichlorohydrin and ethylene chlorohydrin), chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (e.g. dichloromethane, dichloroethane), glycols and ethers (e.g. ethylene glycol, glycol ethers, bis(2-chloroethyl)ether), aldehydes (e.g. formaldehyde), amines (e.g. aniline), aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g. benzene, styrene), alkyl sulfates and other compounds (Shore et al., 1993).

(b) Use of ethylene oxide for industrial sterilization

Industrial workers may be exposed to ethylene oxide during sterilization of a variety of items such as medical equipment and products (e.g. surgical instruments, single-use medical devices), disposable health-care products, pharmaceutical and veterinary products, food spices and animal feed (see Table 1.3, available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100F/100F-23-Table1.3.pdf). Short-term exposures may be high for some workers. Despite recent reductions in exposure, in some countries and for some job categories high exposures to ethylene oxide may still occur.

Workers involved in the sterilization of medical products may also be exposed to gases that are present with ethylene oxide in the sterilizing mixture, such as chlorofluorocarbons and carbon dioxide (Heiden Associates, 1988), and – in the past – to methyl formate, as reported in a study from Sweden (Hagmar et al., 1991).

(c) Use of ethylene oxide in hospitals

Ethylene oxide is widely used in hospitals as a gaseous sterilant for heat-sensitive medical items, surgical instruments and other objects and fluids that come in contact with biological tissues. Large sterilizers are found in central supply areas of most hospitals, and smaller sterilizers are found in clinics, operating rooms, tissue banks and research facilities (Glaser, 1979).

The IARC Monograph Volume 97 (IARC, 2008) summarized levels of exposure to ethylene oxide in hospitals. The more recent studies from Japan and France suggest that the 8-hour TWA concentrations are often below 1 mg/m3 in hospitals.

Exposure to ethylene oxide appears to result mainly from peak emissions during operations such as opening the door of the sterilizer and unloading and transferring sterilized material. Proper engineering controls and work practices result in full-shift exposure levels of less than 0.1 ppm [0.18 mg/m3] and short-term exposure concentration of less than 2 ppm [3.6 mg/m3] (Mortimer & Kercher, 1989). In a survey of 125 hospitals in the USA, however, use of personal protective equipment was found to be limited to wearing gloves while transferring sterilized items, but respirators were not used (Elliott et al., 1988).

As in industrial sterilization facilities, sterilizer operators in hospitals may also be exposed to other gases present in the sterilizing mixture, e.g. chlorofluorocarbons – banned by the Montreal Protocol in 1989 – and carbon dioxide (Wolfs et al., 1983; Deschamps et al., 1989). Some operating-room personnel handling ethylene oxide may also be exposed to anaesthetic gases and X-rays (Sarto et al., 1984a; Chessor et al., 2005), and some may have occasional exposure to low concentrations of formaldehyde (Gardner et al., 1989).

1.3.2 Non-occupational exposure

Most ethylene oxide is released into the atmosphere (WHO, 2003). Ethylene oxide degrades in the atmosphere by reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals. The half-life of ethylene oxide in the atmosphere, assuming ambient concentrations of 5 × 105 hydroxyl radicals/cm3, was reported to be 211 days. Neither rain nor absorption into aqueous aerosols is capable of removing ethylene oxide from the atmosphere (National Library of Medicine, 2005).

Mainstream tobacco smoke contains 7 mg/cigarette ethylene oxide (IARC, 2004). With the possible exception of cigarette smoke, other non-occupational sources of exposure to ethylene oxide (e.g. residues in spices and other food products (Jensen, 1988; Fowles et al., 2001) and in skin-care products (Kreuzer, 1992) are expected to be minor. Ethylene oxide is formed during the combustion of fossil fuel, but the amount is expected to be negligible (WHO, 2003). Hospital patients may be exposed during dialysis when the equipment has been sterilized with ethylene oxide (IPCS-CEC, 2001).

2. Cancer in Humans

Epidemiological evidence of the risk for human cancer from ethylene oxide derives principally from the follow-up of 14 cohorts of exposed workers, either in chemical plants where ethylene oxide was produced or converted into derivatives, or in facilities where it was used as a sterilant. Many of the workers employed at chemical factories were also exposed to other chemicals. The IARC Monograph Volume 97 (IARC, 2008) concluded that there is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide.

The most informative epidemiological investigation of ethylene oxide and cancer risk was a study by NIOSH of more than 18 000 employees at 14 industrial facilities where ethylene oxide was used to sterilize medical supplies or food spices, or to test the sterilizing equipment (Steenland et al., 1991; Stayner et al., 1993). This investigation benefited from greater statistical power than did other studies, as a consequence of its large sample size. In addition, there was a lower potential for confounding by concomitant exposure to other chemicals, while detailed quantitative assessments were made of individual exposures to ethylene oxide. For these reasons, the Working Group gave greatest weight to the findings of this study when assessing the balance of epidemiological evidence on ethylene oxide, although findings from other studies were also taken into account.

2.1. Lympho-haematopoietic malignancies

Steenland et al. (1991) reported on the initial mortality results for the NIOSH ethylene-oxide cohort. There were 343 deaths from cancer (380.3 expected; SMR, 0.90; 95%CI: 0.81–1.00). SMRs were not statistically significantly increased for lymphatic and haematopoietic cancers combined (SMR, 1.06; 95%CI: 0.75–1.47), for lymphosarcoma-reticulosarcoma [ICD-9 200] (SMR, 1.52; 95%CI: 0.65–3.00), Hodgkin lymphoma (SMR, 1.14; 95%CI: 0.31–2.92), leukaemia (SMR, 0.97; 95%CI: 0.52–1.67), non-Hodgkin lymphoma [ICD-9 202] (SMR, 1.20; 95%CI: 0.57–2.37) or myeloma (SMR, 0.59; 95%CI: 0.12–1.73). No significant trend in mortality was observed in relation to duration of exposure, but the SMR for leukaemia (1.79, based on five deaths) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1.92, based on five deaths) were higher after allowance for a latency of more than 20 years. Among the sterilizer operators, mortality ratios were 2.78 (two deaths observed) for leukaemia and 6.68 (two deaths) for lymphosarcoma/reticulosarcoma. In a further analysis of the same study (Stayner et al., 1993), an exposure–response analysis was conducted with the use of previously derived quantitative estimates of individual exposure to ethylene oxide (Greife et al., 1988). Analysis was limited to 13 of the facilities studied, since exposure information at one facility was inadequate. Mortality from lymphatic and haematopoietic cancer was greatest in the group with the highest category of cumulative exposure to ethylene oxide (> 8500 ppm–days) (13 deaths; SMR, 1.24; 95%CI: 0.66–2.13), but the trend across three categories of cumulative exposure was weak (χ2, 0.97; P = 0.32). A similar pattern was observed for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but not for leukaemia. In addition, a Cox proportional-hazard model was used to examine risk in relation to cumulative exposure (ppm–days), average exposure (ppm), maximal exposure (ppm) and duration of exposure (days) to ethylene oxide. A significant positive trend in risk with increasing cumulative exposure to ethylene oxide was observed for all neoplasms of the lymphatic and haematopoietic tissues [P < 0.05, two-tailed]. Moreover, this trend was strengthened [P < 0.01] when the analysis was restricted to neoplasms of lymphoid-cell origin (lymphocytic leukaemia, ICD-9 204; non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ICD-9 200, 202). The exposure–response relationship between cumulative exposure to ethylene oxide and leukaemia was positive but non-significant [P = 0.23]. The regression coefficients for neoplasms of the lymphatic and haematopoietic tissues for duration of exposure, average exposure, and maximal exposure were either weakly positive or negative.

Extending the mortality assessments through 1998, an updated life-table analysis of cancer mortality in the cohort was carried out (Steenland et al., 2004) (see Table 2.1, available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100F/100F-23-Table2.1.pdf). There were 860 deaths from cancer overall (SMR, 0.98; 95%CI: 0.92–1.03), and a statistically significant excess was found only for cancer of the bone (SMR, 2.82; 95%CI: 1.23–5.56, based on six observed deaths). In an internal analysis (excluding one small plant for which exposure data were not available), mortality from lymphatic and haematopoietic cancer was associated with log-cumulative exposures to ethylene oxide lagged by 15 years in men (p for trend = 0.02), but not in women. However, duration of exposure, peak exposure, and average or cumulative exposure did not predict mortality from lymphatic and haematopoietic cancer. A similar pattern was observed for lymphoid-cell tumours specifically (including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, myeloma and lymphocytic leukaemia), with risks of 3.76 (95%CI: 1.03–13.64; p for trend = 0.13). [The Working Group noted that the exposure assessment in the Steenland et al. (2004) update was limited by the assumption that exposure levels did not change during extended follow-up for about 25% of workers who were exposed at the time of the last actual exposure-data collection. Follow-up taking place long after the period of highest exposure may have attenuated results in the most recent publication.]

A cohort of ethylene oxide-production workers in the Kanawha Valley Union Carbide facility (UC) in West Virginia (USA) was studied by Greenberg et al. (1990), Teta et al. (1993), and most recently by Swaen et al. (2009). The latter report updated the cohort to include 2063 men employed between 1940 and 1988, and updated mortality information through 2003. No indications were found for excess cancer risks from exposure to ethylene oxide, including risks for lympho-haematopoietic malignancies, by SMR analysis. Combining primary data from the NIOSH and UC cohorts Valdez-Flores et al. (2010) also reported no excess cancer risks by SMR-based analysis for these cohorts followed respectively to 1998 (Steenland et al., 2004) and 2003 (Swaen et al., 2009). Other cohort studies did not consistently point at an increased risk for specific haematolymphoproliferative malignancies, although moderate elevations of risk were reported in some investigations (see Table 2.1 online).

A meta-analysis on the data available on nearly 33 000 workers from Germany, Italy, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the USA was performed by Teta et al. (1999). The meta-SMR for all leukaemia was 1.08 (95%CI: 0.61–1.93, based on 35 deaths); for non-Hodgkin lymphoma it was 1.34 (95%CI: 0.96–1.89, based on 33 deaths).

[The Working Group noted that evaluation of the possible risks for lymphatic and haematopoietic cancer was hampered by inconsistencies in the histopathological classification of diagnoses over time. The interpretation of results for these malignancies was constrained by the diagnostic groupings that had been used by researchers when the studies were conducted.]

2.2. Cancer of the breast

Studies from four cohorts of workers exposed to ethylene oxide provided useful information on the association between this exposure and breast cancer (Gardner et al., 1989; Hagmar et al., 1991, 1995; Norman et al., 1995; Steenland et al., 2003, 2004; Coggon et al., 2004; see Table 2.2, available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100F/100F-23-Table2.2.pdf). The NIOSH study (Steenland et al., 2004) and a cohort study of hospital-based sterilization workers in the United Kingdom (Gardner et al., 1989; Coggon et al., 2004) examined mortality from breast cancer and found no overall excess risk. Three studies examined the incidence of breast cancer: the NIOSH study (Steenland et al., 2003) and a cohort study from Sweden (Hagmar et al., 1991, 1995) found no overall excess risk, while another cohort study from New York State, USA, found an excess risk of about 60%, which was borderline significant (Norman et al., 1995). Internal analyses with inclusion of questionnaire data were carried out in the NIOSH study (Steenland et al., 2003) showing increased relative risks for breast cancer at the highest level of cumulative exposure to ethylene oxide (> 11620 ppm–days, 15-year lag, OR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.12–3.10), with a significant exposure–response relationship [P for trend = 0.002), after controlling for parity and history of breast cancer in a first-degree relative.

2.3. Other cancers

Several cohort studies provided data on exposure to ethylene oxide and mortality from other cancers (stomach, brain, pancreas; see Table 2.2, available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100F/100F-23-Table2.2.pdf). There was no consistent evidence of an association of these cancers with exposure to ethylene oxide.

2.4. Synthesis

The Working Group found some epidemiological evidence for associations between exposure to ethylene oxide and lymphatic and haematopoietic cancers, and specifically lymphoid tumours (i.e. non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia).

3. Cancer in Experimental Animals

Carcinogenicity studies with mice and rats exposed to ethylene oxide by inhalation, oral gavage, and subcutaneous injection were previously reviewed (IARC, 1994, 2008). Results of adequately conducted carcinogenicity studies are summarized in Table 3.1. There have been no additional carcinogenicity studies in animals reported since the previous evaluation in IARC Monograph Volume 97 (IARC, 2008).

Table 3.1. Carcinogenicity studies in experimental animals exposed to ethylene oxide by inhalation, oral gavage and subcutaneous injection.

Table 3.1

Carcinogenicity studies in experimental animals exposed to ethylene oxide by inhalation, oral gavage and subcutaneous injection.

3.1. Inhalation exposure

In two inhalation studies in mice, there was an increased incidence of alveolar bronchiolar carcinomas and combined adenomas and carcinomas in male and female B6C3F1 mice (NTP, 1987) and of lung adenomas in strain A/J female mice (Adkins et al., 1986). Treatment-related increases in lymphomas, Harderian gland cystadenoma, mammary gland carcinomas and uterine adenocarcinomas were also seen in B6C3F1 mice (NTP, 1987; Picut et al., 2003).

In two inhalation studies in F344 rats (Lynch et al., 1984; Snellings et al., 1984; Garman, et al., 1985, 1986), there was an increased incidence in gliomas [not further specified], mononuclear cell leukaemia and peritoneal mesotheliomas. A treatment-related increase in subcutaneous fibromas also occurred in male rats (Snellings et al., 1984).

3.2. Other routes of exposure

In one study, subcutaneous injection of ethylene oxide in female NMRI mice resulted in a dose-related increase in the incidence of sarcomas at the injection site (Dunkelberg, 1981).

In one study with female Sprague-Dawley rats that received ethylene oxide by gavage, there was a treatment-related increase in fore-stomach squamous-cell carcinomas (Dunkelberg, 1982).

4. Other Relevant Data

Experimental studies on ethylene oxide have been evaluated previously in IARC Monograph Volumes 60 and 97 (IARC, 1994, 2008). There is an extensive body of data on the mechanism of ethylene oxide-induced carcinogenicity encompassing toxicokinetics, DNA-adduct formation, biomarkers, genotoxicity, and molecular biology. Ethylene oxide is a direct alkylating agent that reacts with nucleophiles without the need for metabolic transformation. It has been shown to have genotoxic and mutagenic activity in numerous assays in both somatic and germ cells, and prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms (IARC, 1994, 2008). Ethylene oxide is active in a wide range of in vitro and in vivo systems. Increases in both gene mutations and chromosomal alterations, two general classes of cancer-related genetic changes, have been observed. The direct reaction of ethylene oxide with DNA is thought to initiate the cascade of genetic and related events that lead to cancer (Swenberg et al., 1990). Thus, formation of DNA adducts and resultant mutations are key steps in the mechanism of carcinogenicity for this agent.

4.1. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion

Ethylene oxide is readily taken up by the lungs and is absorbed relatively efficiently into the blood. A study of workers exposed to ethylene oxide revealed an alveolar retention of 75–80%, calculated from hourly measurements of ethylene oxide in ambient air, which ranged from 0.2 to 24.1 mg/m3 [0.11–13.2 ppm], and in alveolar air, which ranged from 0.05 to 6 mg/m3 [0.03–3.3 ppm] (Brugnone et al., 1985, 1986). At steady-state, therefore, 20–25% of inhaled ethylene oxide that reached the alveolar space was exhaled as the unchanged compound and 75–80% was taken up by the body and metabolized. Blood samples taken from workers at four hours after the work-shift gave venous blood/alveolar air coefficients of 12–17 and venous blood/environmental air coefficients of 2.5–3.3.

The mammalian metabolic pathways of ethylene oxide are shown in Fig. 4.1 and can be summarized as follows: Ethylene oxide is converted (a) by enzymatic and non-enzymatic hydrolysis to ethylene glycol, which is partly excreted as such and partly metabolized further via glycolaldehyde, glycolic acid and glyoxalic acid to oxalic acid, formic acid and carbon dioxide; and (b) by conjugation with glutathione (GSH) followed by further metabolism to S-(2-hydroxyethyl)cysteine, S-(2-carboxymethyl)cysteine and N-acetylated derivatives (N-acetyl-S-(2-hydroxyethyl)cysteine (also known as S-(2-hydroxyethyl)mercapturic acid or HEMA) and N-acetyl-S-(2-carboxymethyl)cysteine) (Wolfs et al., 1983; Popp et al., 1994), which are partly converted to thio-diacetic acid (Scheick et al., 1997).

Fig. 4.1

Fig. 4.1

Metabolism of ethylene oxide

Concentrations of ethylene glycol were determined at the end of day 3 of a normal working week in blood samples from sterilization personnel exposed to ethylene oxide. TWA concentrations of ethylene oxide determined over eight hours ranged from 0.3 to 52 ppm [0.55–95.2 mg/m3] (overall mean, 4.2 ppm [7.7 mg/m3]). The mean concentrations of ethylene glycol in the blood of exposed subjects were twice as high (90 mg/L) as those in controls (45 mg/L) (Wolfs et al., 1983).

The concentration of thioethers excreted in urine collected at the end of sterilization processes was found to be twice as high in non-smoking personnel (10.2 mmol/mol creatinine) exposed to peak concentrations of 1–200 ppm [1.83–366 mg/m3] ethylene oxide as the thioether concentration in unexposed workers (5.46 mmol/mol creatinine). The concentration of ethylene oxide in air was not monitored routinely (Burgaz et al., 1992).

The glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity towards ethylene oxide in cytosolic fractions from human livers was low (too low to determine the Michaelis-Menten constant [Km] value). The maximum velocity (Vmax) varied from 7.6 to 10.6 nmol/min/mg protein. Epoxide-hydrolase (EH) activity in the microsomal fraction of human liver averaged 1.8 nmol/min/mg protein. The Km for hydrolysis was estimated to be approximately 0.2 mM, but non-enzymatic hydrolysis was considerable and precluded accurate measurement (Fennell & Brown, 2001).

Metabolism of ethylene oxide to the GSH conjugate and ethylene glycol is generally considered to be the major pathway for the elimination of DNA-reactive ethylene oxide. However, strongly suggestive evidence in vitro was presented by Hengstler et al. (1994) that glycolaldehyde is formed by further metabolism of ethylene glycol and that this derivative leads to DNA–protein crosslinks and DNA strand-breaks (as measured with the alkaline elution assay) after in-vitro incubation with human mononuclear peripheral blood cells.

4.2. Genetic and related effects

4.2.1. GST polymorphisms

Ethylene oxide is a substrate of the GST iso-enzyme T1 (Hayes et al., 2005). This detoxifying enzyme is polymorphic and a relatively large proportion of the population (about 20% of Caucasians, almost 50% of Asians) has a homozygous deletion (GSTT1-null genotype) (Bolt & Thier, 2006). As expected, these individuals show a significantly higher amount of hydroxyethyl valine in their haemoglobin due to the presence of endogenous ethylene oxide (Thier et al., 2001). Nevertheless, the influence of this genetic trait on the formation of this type of adduct as a result of exposure to exogenous ethylene oxide at the workplace is much less clear, as discussed below.

In the cytoplasm of erythrocytes obtained from 36 individuals, ethylene oxide was eliminated three to six times faster in samples from so-called conjugators (defined by a standardized conjugation reaction of methyl bromide and GSH; 75% of the population) than in those from the remaining 25% (who lack this GST-specific activity). In the latter samples, the rate of disappearance did not differ from that of controls. In this experiment, the disappearance of ethylene oxide was investigated in the gas phase, in closed vials that contained GSH and cytoplasm of erythrocytes (Hallier et al., 1993).

Studies on the genotoxicity of ethylene oxide were reviewed in detail in IARC Monograph Volume 97 (IARC, 2008). Studies with peripheral blood of exposed workers have shown that exposure to ethylene oxide is associated with an elevated number of chromosomal aberrations including breaks, gaps, exchanges, and supernumerary chromosomes. An increased frequency of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) in the peripheral lymphocytes of workers handling ethylene oxide was also reported.

4.2.2. DNA-adduct formation

In-vitro and in-vivo studies have shown that ethylene oxide can bind to cellular macromolecules, which results in a variety of DNA, RNA and protein adducts. The major DNA adduct recovered in vivo is N7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine (7-HEG), while some minor adducts such as N3-(2-hydroxyethyl)adenine (3-HEA) and O6-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine (O6-HEG), are detected at much lower levels (Walker et al., 1992). In-vitro studies indicate that other minor adducts can also be formed from the reaction of ethylene oxide with the N1 and N6 positions of adenine and the N3 position of cytosine, uracil and thymine (IARC, 1994; Tates et al., 1999; Kolman et al., 2002).

Tompkins et al. (2009) suggested that the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide could be attributed to formation of multiple 2-hydroxyethyl (HE) DNA adducts such as 3-HEA and O6-HEG. Boysen et al. (2009) argued that there is little evidence that 7-HEG adducts cause mutations since – unlike the N1, N2, or O6 positions of guanine – they do not participate in hydrogen bonding in the DNA double-helix and easily de-purinate. These authors conclude that the formation of N7-guanine adducts cannot be used in isolation as a quantitative biomarker for pro-mutagenic DNA lesions or mutagenic response. Marsden et al. (2009) used a dual-isotope approach to distinguish between endogenously formed background levels of 7-HEG and exogenously formed 7-HEG adducts in rats following exposure to [14C]-labelled ethylene oxide. By combining liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography/accelerator mass spectrometry analysis, both the endogenous and exogenous N7-HEG adducts were quantified in tissues of [14C]ethylene oxide-treated rats. Levels of [14C]-7-HEG induced in spleen, liver, and stomach DNA were insignificant compared with the measured background levels of N7-HEG naturally present.

The exact mechanism by which the other ethylene oxide-induced DNA adducts such as 3-HEA and O6-HEG may lead to mutation is unknown. Several mechanisms could be involved, including the mispairing of altered bases or the formation of apurinic/apyrimidinic sites via DNA repair or chemical depurination/ depyrimidination combined with the insertion of another base, which would typically be an adenine opposite an apurinic site (Tates et al., 1999; Houle et al., 2006). These lesions can also lead to the formation of DNA single-strand breaks and, subsequently, to chromosomal breakage. In addition, the putative ethylene oxide metabolite, glycolaldehyde, has been shown to form DNA–protein crosslinks and DNA single-strand breaks (Hengstler et al., 1994).

4.2.3. Cytogenetic alterations and mutations

Studies of human exposure to ethylene oxide have focused on individuals employed in the operation of hospital- or factory-based sterilization units, and on workers who were involved in manufacturing or processing of ethylene oxide. The studies show that exposure to ethylene oxide results in chromosomal alterations that are related to both the level and duration of exposure, while a single study suggested that exposure to ethylene oxide causes gene mutations.

(a) Sister chromatid exchange

The induction of increased frequencies of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) has been found to be a sensitive indicator of genotoxic exposure to ethylene oxide in humans (Tates et al., 1991). In several studies, significant differences were found in SCE frequencies in individuals and/or groups exposed to levels of ethylene oxide higher than the designated low-exposure group from the same or a similar environments (Yager et al., 1983; Sarto et al., 1984a; Stolley et al., 1984; Tates et al., 1991; Schulte et al., 1992). These findings support the observation that SCE frequencies varied with level and frequency of exposure to ethylene oxide. In two studies SCE frequencies were investigated over time: they remained elevated for at least six months even when exposures diminished or ceased after the first assessment (Sarto et al., 1984b; Stolley et al., 1984).

(b) Chromosomal aberrations

Chromosomal aberration frequencies correlate with exposure concentrations of ethylene oxide and/or duration of the exposure (Clare et al., 1985; Galloway et al., 1986; Tates et al., 1991; Lerda & Rizzi, 1992). As reported for SCE, the validity of these comparisons is supported by the observation that some investigators found significant increases in chromosomal aberrations in high-dose groups but not in low-dose groups exposed in the same or similar environments (Sarto et al., 1984b; Galloway et al., 1986). In workers exposed to a range of concentrations of ethylene oxide [0.01–200 ppm; 0.02–366 mg/m3] the presence of chromosomal aberrations was evaluated; in most of the workers significant increases in chromosomal aberrations were found (Pero et al., 1981; Högstedt et al., 1983, 1990; Sarto et al., 1984b; Richmond et al., 1985; Galloway et al., 1986; Karelová et al., 1987; Tates et al., 1991; Lerda & Rizzi, 1992; Ribeiro et al., 1994; Major et al., 1996). In one study, such increases were found in individuals exposed to concentrations of ethylene oxide of approximately 1 ppm [1.83 mg/m3] and even lower (Högstedt et al., 1983). However, in other studies of workers exposed to these low concentrations of ethylene oxide, evidence of increased chromosomal aberrations was not found (Van Sittert et al., 1985; Mayer et al., 1991).

(c) Micronuclei

Few investigators have evaluated the impact of exposure to ethylene oxide on the frequency of micronucleated cells, and the available studies reported positive or no effects. Högstedt et al. (1990) and Ribeiro et al. (1994) found an increased frequency of micronucleated lymphocytes in workers, while Tates et al. (1991) found significant increases in micronucleus frequency in workers exposed to high, but not to low doses. Exposure concentrations in all these studies varied widely, ranging from < 1 ppm to 400 ppm [1.83–732 mg/m3] ethylene oxide. Studies that evaluated micronucleus formation in individuals exposed to ethylene oxide at concentrations ≤ 1 ppm were negative (Högstedt et al., 1983; Sarto et al., 1990, 1991; Tates et al., 1995).

In two studies micronucleus formation was determined in cells other than lymphocytes. Ribeiro et al. (1994) evaluated both peripheral blood lymphocytes and exfoliated buccal cells in individuals exposed to 2–5 ppm [3.66–9.15 mg/m3] ethylene oxide (TWA); micronucleus frequencies in buccal cells were not associated with the exposure, while those in lymphocytes showed a significant positive association. Sarto et al. (1990) found a significant increase in micronucleus frequency in nasal mucosal cells, but not in exfoliated buccal cells of workers exposed to ethylene oxide at concentrations below 0.38 ppm [0.7 mg/m3] (TWA).

(d) Gene mutations

The question whether occupational exposure to ethylene oxide is associated with the induction of gene mutations has been addressed in three reports. In the first study, the T-cell cloning assay was used to measure HPRT mutant frequencies in peripheral blood lymphocytes from nine ethylene oxide-exposed hospital workers and 15 ethylene oxide-exposed factory workers (Tates et al., 1991). Hospital workers included nurses and technicians involved in the sterilization of medical equipment and exposed to ethylene oxide once or twice a week for about 10 minutes. The concentrations of ethylene oxide ranged from 20 to 25 ppm [36.6–45.8 mg/m3] in the sterilization room and from 22 to 72 ppm [40.3–131.8 mg/m3] in front of the sterilizer immediately after opening. The hospital workers were matched for age, sex and smoking habits with a control group of eight unexposed administrative workers. The factory workers were employed at a plant that was involved in the production of ethylene oxide-sterilized disposable medical equipment, and were similarly matched with a group of 15 unexposed controls in the same factory. During a four-month monitoring period (equivalent to the lifespan of erythrocytes in humans), five workers were engaged in ‘daily’ sterilization activities, two workers were involved in ‘daily’ sterilization except for leave periods of 7 or 11 days, and the eight remaining workers were ‘occasionally’ exposed to ethylene oxide during exposure control, packing and quality control of sterilized products. Before the collection of samples in early 1990, the mean duration of exposure of factory workers to ethylene oxide had been 12 years (range, 3–27 years), with average ambient exposure levels from 1989 onwards that were estimated at about 17 ppm [~31 mg/m3]. Based on measurements of N-(2-hydroxyethy)valine–haemoglobin adducts, which integrate exposure over time, average exposures to ethylene oxide in the four months before blood sampling were estimated at a 40-hour TWA of 0.025 ppm [0.046 mg/m3] for hospital workers and 5 ppm [9.15 mg/m3] for factory workers (Tates et al., 1991). The average HPRT mutant frequencies in hospital workers (12.4 ± 9.9 × 10−6) and factory workers (13.8 ± 4.4 × 10−6) were remarkably similar and showed increases of 55% and 60%, respectively, above the background frequency in their respective control groups (8.0 ± 3.6 × 10−6 and 8.6 ± 4.4 × 10−6); however, the mutagenic response was significantly elevated only in the factory workers, which was probably due to the higher exposure concentrations and tissue doses of ethylene oxide in these workers.

In a follow-up study of workers in an ethylene oxide-production plant, Tates et al. (1995) used the T-cell cloning assay to measure HPRT mutant frequencies in three exposed groups and one unexposed group (seven subjects per group). Group-I workers were incidentally exposed to acute high concentrations of ethylene oxide, while workers in Groups II and III had been chronically exposed to low concentrations of ethylene oxide for < 5 years and > 15 years, respectively. No significant differences in mutant frequencies were observed between any combination of worker or control groups, which implies that incidental exposure to high levels of ethylene oxide (28−429 ppm; 52–785 mg/m3) or chronic exposure to low concentrations of ethylene oxide (< 0.005−0.02 ppm; < 0.01–0.04 mg/m3) did not cause any measurable permanent gene mutation in lymphocytes at this locus.

In-vivo mutation-induction studies with reporter genes such as Hprt or the LacI-transgene have shown that ethylene oxide can significantly increase the frequency of mutations in both mice and rats (Walker & Skopek, 1993; Sisk et al., 1997; Walker et al., 1997a, b; Tates et al., 1999; Recio et al., 2004). The type of mutation that is recovered appears to be influenced by the assay system used. In mouse splenic and/or thymic T lymphocytes, mutations in Hprt could be detected after shorter exposures (a 4-week inhalation exposure or multiple intra-peritoneal injections over the course of one week) and appeared to consist of larger deletion mutations as well as base-pair substitutions and frame-shift mutations (Walker & Skopek, 1993; Walker et al., 1997a, b). The latter point mutations appeared to originate primarily from either altered G or A nucleobases (Walker & Skopek, 1993; IARC, 1994). In the inhalation study, no significant increases in LacI mutations were seen in the spleen, bone marrow or germ cells of mice after four weeks of exposure to ethylene oxide (Sisk et al., 1997). A modest but significant increase in LacI mutants was seen in the lungs of mice exposed to 200 ppm [366 mg/m3] ethylene oxide. In a follow-up study with prolonged exposure (up to 48 weeks), significant increases in LacI mutants were seen in the bone marrow and testes of the ethylene oxide-exposed transgenic mice (Recio et al., 2004). DNA-sequence analysis of mutants obtained from the bone marrow showed that only AT→TA transversions were recovered at a significantly increased frequency in the exposed mice. A unique mutational spectrum was not seen in the testes.

An elevated frequency of mutations or a change in mutational spectra has been seen in the tumours of ethylene oxide-treated mice (Houle et al., 2006; Hong et al., 2007). In the study by Hong et al. (2007), K-Ras mutations were detected in 100% (23/23) of ethylene oxide-induced lung tumours compared with 25% (27/108) of spontaneous tumours. Codon-12 G→T transversions occurred frequently in the ethylene oxide-induced lung neoplasms (21/23) but infrequently in spontaneous lung neoplasms (1/108). Similarly, K-Ras mutations were found in 86% (18/21) of Harderian gland tumours from ethylene oxide-treated animals, but were seen in only 7% (2/27) of the spontaneous tumours in this organ. Codon-13 G→C and codon-12 G→T transversions were common in the ethylene oxide-induced Harderian gland tumours, but they were absent in the spontaneous tumours in this organ (0/27). K-Ras mutations were also seen in 83% (5/6) of ethylene oxide-induced uterine tumours, all of which showed a G→C transition in codon 13. The incidence in spontaneous uterine tumours was not reported. A similar study by Houle et al. (2006) provided evidence of the involvement of H-Ras and p53 mutations in mammary gland tumours induced by ethylene oxide in mice. The mutation frequency was only slightly elevated for H-Ras (33% in treated vs 26% in controls) or p53 (67% in the ethylene oxide-treated versus 58% in the control animals), but the mutational spectra in tumours obtained from control and treated animals differed significantly. The mutational spectra were generally consistent with a targeting of G and A bases by ethylene oxide (Houle et al., 2006; Hong et al., 2007). The high frequency of mutation in these genes, particularly mutations in the critical codons of K-Ras and inactivation of p53, indicate that mutations are induced in the tumours of ethylene oxide-treated mice and that the changes probably play an important role in ethylene oxide-induced tumour development in these tissues.

Acute myelogenous leukaemia in patients previously treated with alkylating agents frequently shows specific characteristics that allow it to be distinguished from acute myelogenous leukaemia induced by other agents (such as topoisomerase II-inhibitors) or occurring spontaneously (Pedersen-Bjergaard & Rowley, 1994; Pedersen-Bjergaard et al., 2006). One of the hallmarks of leukaemias induced by alkylating agents is that they frequently show loss of chromosomes 5 or 7 (−5, −7) or loss of part of the long arms of these chromosomes (5q-, 7q-). In addition, mutations in p53 are frequently seen in leukaemias with the −5/5q- karyotype, and mutations in p53 and Ras are seen in a subset of those that exhibit the −7/7q- karyotype (Christiansen et al., 2001; Pedersen-Bjergaard et al., 2006). Although ethylene oxide has not been investigated specifically for its ability to induce losses of chromosomes 5 or 7, or deletions of the long arms of these chromosomes (5q- or 7q-), it has been reported to induce similar types of chromosomal alteration and deletions in a variety of experimental models and/or in the lymphocytes of exposed workers (IARC, 1994; Major et al., 1996, 1999). The detection of elevated levels of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of ethylene oxide-exposed workers is of particular interest, as individuals with increased levels of chromosomal aberrations or micronuclei in these cells are at an increased risk for cancer (Hagmar et al., 1998; Liou et al., 1999; Smerhovsky et al., 2001; Hagmar et al., 2004; Boffetta et al., 2007; Bonassi et al., 2007).

A comparison of the evidence for ethylene oxide-induced genetic and related changes in experimental animals and humans is summarized in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1. Comparison of the evidence for key events – cytogenetic, genetic, and related changes – induced by ethylene oxide in humans, human cells, and experimental animals.

Table 4.1

Comparison of the evidence for key events – cytogenetic, genetic, and related changes – induced by ethylene oxide in humans, human cells, and experimental animals.

In conclusion, the numerous studies on ethylene oxide that focused on toxicokinetics, DNA-adduct formation, biomarkers, genotoxicity, and molecular biology provide strong evidence that the carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide, a direct-acting alkylating agent, involves a genotoxic mechanism of action. The direct reaction of ethylene oxide with DNA is thought to initiate the cascade of genetic and related events that lead to cancer. Ethylene oxide induces a dose-related increase in the frequency of ethylene oxide-derived haemoglobin adducts in exposed humans and rodents, induces a dose-related increase in the frequency of ethylene oxide-derived DNA adducts in exposed rodents, consistently acts as a mutagen and clastogen at all phylogenetic levels, induces heritable translocations in the germ cells of exposed rodents, and induces a dose-related increase in the frequency of sister chromatid exchange, chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus formation in the lymphocytes of exposed workers.

5. Evaluation

There is limited evidence in humans for a causal association of ethylene oxide with lymphatic and haematopoietic cancers (specifically lymphoid tumours, i.e. non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia), and breast cancer.

There is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide.

There is strong evidence that the carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide, a direct-acting alkylating agent, operates by a genotoxic mechanism. A dose-related increase in the frequency of ethylene oxide-derived haemoglobin adducts has been observed in exposed humans and rodents, and a dose-related increase in the frequency of ethylene oxide-derived DNA adducts has been demonstrated in exposed rodents. Ethylene oxide consistently acts as a mutagen and clastogen at all phylogenetic levels, it induces heritable translocations in the germ cells of exposed rodents, and a dose-related increase in the frequency of sister chromatid exchange, chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus formation in the lymphocytes of exposed workers.

Ethylene oxide is carcinogenic to humans (Group 1).

In making the overall evaluation, the Working Group considered that there is sufficient evidence for the carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide in experimental animals, and relied heavily on the compelling data in support of the genotoxic mechanism described above.

References

  • Adkins B Jr, Van Stee EW, Simmons JE, Eustis SL. Oncogenic response of strain A/J mice to inhaled chemicals. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1986;17:311–322. [PubMed: 3083111]
  • Boffetta P, van der Hel O, Norppa H, et al. Chromosomal aberrations and cancer risk: results of a cohort study from Central Europe. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:36–43. [PubMed: 17071846] [CrossRef]
  • Bolt HM, Thier R. Relevance of the deletion polymorphisms of the glutathione S-transferases GSTT1 and GSTM1 in pharmacology and toxicology. Curr Drug Metab. 2006;7:613–628. [PubMed: 16918316] [CrossRef]
  • Bonassi S, Znaor A, Ceppi M, et al. An increased micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer in humans. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:625–31. [PubMed: 16973674] [CrossRef]
  • Boysen G, Pachkowski BF, Nakamura J, Swenberg JA. The formation and biological significance of N7-guanine adducts. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2009;678:76–94. [PMC free article: PMC2739241] [PubMed: 19465146] [CrossRef]
  • Brugnone F, Perbellini L, Faccini G, Pasini F. Concentration of ethylene oxide in the alveolar air of occupationally exposed workers. Am J Ind Med. 1985;8:67–72. [PubMed: 4025340] [CrossRef]
  • Brugnone F, Perbellini L, Faccini GB, et al. Ethylene oxide exposure. Biological monitoring by analysis of alveolar air and blood. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1986;58:105–112. [PubMed: 3744564] [CrossRef]
  • Burgaz S, Rezanko R, Kara S, Karakaya AE. Thioethers in urine of sterilization personnel exposed to ethylene oxide. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1992;17:169–172. [PubMed: 1639877] [CrossRef]
  • CAREX (1999). Carex: industry specific estimates – Summary. Available at http://www​.ttl.fi/en​/chemical_safety/carex​/Documents/5_exposures​_by_agent_and_industry.pdf .
  • Chessor E, Verhoeven M, Hon C-Y, Teschke K. Evaluation of a modified scavenging system to reduce occupational exposure to nitrous oxide in labor and delivery rooms. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005;2:314–322. [PubMed: 16020092] [CrossRef]
  • Christiansen DH, Andersen MK, Pedersen-Bjergaard J. Mutations with loss of heterozygosity of p53 are common in therapy-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia after exposure to alkylating agents and significantly associated with deletion or loss of 5q, a complex karyotype, and a poor prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1405–1413. [PubMed: 11230485]
  • Clare MG, Dean BJ, de Jong G, van Sittert NJ. Chromosome analysis of lymphocytes from workers at an ethylene oxide plant. Mutat Res. 1985;156:109–116. [PubMed: 4000173] [CrossRef]
  • Coggon D, Harris EC, Poole J, Palmer KT. Mortality of workers exposed to ethylene oxide: extended follow up of a British cohort. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:358–362. [PMC free article: PMC1740757] [PubMed: 15031395] [CrossRef]
  • Deschamps D, Laurent A-M, Festy B, Conso F. Study of six ethylene oxide sterilization units in the Poor Law Administration of Paris] (Fre.). Archives des Maladies Professionnelles. 1989;50:641–649.
  • Devanney MT (2010). CEH Marketing Research Report – Ethylene Oxide (Abstract). Zürich: SRI Consulting.
  • Dever JP, George KF, Hoffman WC, Soo H (2004). Ethylene oxide. In: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 10, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 632–673 (online)
  • Dunkelberg H. Carcinogenic activity of ethylene oxide and its reaction products 2-chloro-ethanol, 2-bromoethanol, ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol. I. Carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide in comparison with 1,2-propylene oxide after subcutaneous administration in mice. Zbl Bakt Hyg I Abt Orig B. 1981;174:383–404. [ ] [PubMed: 7342570]
  • Dunkelberg H. Carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide and 1,2-propylene oxide upon intragastric administration to rats. Br J Cancer. 1982;46:924–933. [PMC free article: PMC2011226] [PubMed: 7150486]
  • Elliott LJ, Ringenburg VL, Morelli-Schroth P, et al. Ethylene oxide exposures in hospitals. Appl Ind Hyg. 1988;3:141–145.
  • Fennell TR, Brown CD. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for ethylene oxide in mouse, rat, and human. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001;173:161–175. [PubMed: 11437638] [CrossRef]
  • Fowles J, Mitchell J, McGrath H. Assessment of cancer risk from ethylene oxide residues in spices imported into New Zealand. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2001;39:1055–1062. [PubMed: 11527564] [CrossRef]
  • Galloway SM, Berry PK, Nichols WW, et al. Chromosome aberrations in individuals occupationally exposed to ethylene oxide, and in a large control population. Mutat Res. 1986;170:55–74. [PubMed: 3960044] [CrossRef]
  • Gardner MJ, Coggon D, Pannett B, Harris EC. Workers exposed to ethylene oxide: a follow up study. Br J Ind Med. 1989;46:860–865. [PMC free article: PMC1009883] [PubMed: 2611160]
  • Garman RH, Snellings WM, Maronpot RR. Brain tumors in F344 rats associated with chronic inhalation exposure to ethylene oxide. Neurotoxicology. 1985;6:117–137. [PubMed: 3887231]
  • Garman RH, Snellings WM, Maronpot RR. Frequency, size and location of brain tumours in F-344 rats chronically exposed to ethylene oxide. Food Chem Toxicol. 1986;24:145–153. [PubMed: 3957162]
  • Glaser ZR. Ethylene oxide: Toxicology review and field study results of hospital use. Journal of Environmental Pathology and Toxicology. 1979;12:173–208. [PubMed: 117070]
  • Greenberg HL, Ott MG, Shore RE. Men assigned to ethylene oxide production or other ethylene oxide related chemical manufacturing: a mortality study. Br J Ind Med. 1990;47:221–230. [PMC free article: PMC1035141] [PubMed: 2337530]
  • Greife AL, Hornung RW, Stayner LG, Steenland KN. Development of a model for use in estimating exposure to ethylene oxide in a retrospective cohort mortality study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1988;14 Suppl 1:29–30. [PubMed: 3393872]
  • Hagmar L, Bonassi S, Strömberg U, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer: a report from the European Study Group on Cytogenetic Biomarkers and Health (ESCH). Cancer Res. 1998;58:4117–4121. [PubMed: 9751622]
  • Hagmar L, Mikoczy Z, Welinder H. Cancer incidence in Swedish sterilant workers exposed to ethylene oxide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1995;52:154–156. [PMC free article: PMC1128178] [PubMed: 7735385] [CrossRef]
  • Hagmar L, Strömberg U, Bonassi S, et al. Impact of types of lymphocyte chromosomal aberrations on human cancer risk: results from Nordic and Italian cohorts. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2258–63. [PubMed: 15026371] [CrossRef]
  • Hagmar L, Welinder H, Lindén K, et al. An epidemiological study of cancer risk among workers exposed to ethylene oxide using hemoglobin adducts to validate environmental exposure assessments. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991;63:271–277. [PubMed: 1743769] [CrossRef]
  • Hallier E, Langhof T, Dannappel D, et al. Polymorphism of glutathione conjugation of methyl bromide, ethylene oxide and dichloromethane in human blood: influence on the induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) in lymphocytes. Arch Toxicol. 1993;67:173–178. [PubMed: 8494496] [CrossRef]
  • Hayes JD, Flanagan JU, Jowsey IR. Glutathione transferases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:51–88. [PubMed: 15822171] [CrossRef]
  • Heiden Associates (1988). A Medical Products Industry Profile for Evaluating Compliance with Two Ethylene Oxide Workplace STEL Scenarios: 10 ppm STEL and 5 ppm STEL. Washington, DC.
  • Hengstler JG, Fuchs J, Gebhard S, Oesch F. Glycolaldehyde causes DNA-protein crosslinks: a new aspect of ethylene oxide genotoxicity. Mutat Res. 1994;304:229–234. [PubMed: 7506366]
  • Högstedt B, Bergmark E, Törnqvist M, Osterman-Golkar S. Chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in lymphocytes in relation to alkylation of hemoglobin in workers exposed to ethylene oxide and propylene oxide. Hereditas. 1990;113:133–138. [PubMed: 2079438] [CrossRef]
  • Högstedt B, Gullberg B, Hedner K, et al. Chromosome aberrations and micronuclei in bone marrow cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes in humans exposed to ethylene oxide. Hereditas. 1983;98:105–113. [PubMed: 6853215] [CrossRef]
  • Hong H-HL, Houle CD, Ton T-VT, Sills RC. K-ras mutations in lung tumors and tumors from other organs are consistent with a common mechanism of ethylene oxide tumorigenesis in the B6C3F1 mouse. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35:81–5. [PMC free article: PMC2099306] [PubMed: 17325976] [CrossRef]
  • Houle CD, Ton T-VT, Clayton N, Huff J, Hong H-H, Sills R. Frequent p53 and H-ras mutations in benzene- and ethylene oxide-induced mammary gland carcinomas from B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34:752–62. [PubMed: 17162533] [CrossRef]
  • IARC. Cadmium, nickel, some epoxides, miscellaneous industrial chemicals and general considerations on volatile anaesthetics. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Man. 1976;11:1–306. [PubMed: 992654]
  • IARC. Allyl compounds, aldehydes, epoxides and peroxides. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum. 1985;36:1–369.
  • IARC. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC Monographs volumes 1 to 42. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum Suppl. 1987;7:1–440. [PubMed: 3482203]
  • IARC. Some industrial chemicals. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1994;60:1–560. [PMC free article: PMC7681540] [PubMed: 7869568]
  • IARC. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2004;83:1–1438. [PMC free article: PMC4781536] [PubMed: 15285078]
  • IARC. 20081,3-Butadiene, ethylene oxide and vinyl halides (vinyl fluoride, vinyl chloride and vinyl bromide). IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 971–510.PMID: 20232717. [PMC free article: PMC4782275] [PubMed: 20232717]
  • IPCS-CEC (2001). International Chemical Safety Card 0155. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Jensen KG. Determination of ethylene oxide residues in processed food products by gas-liquid chromatography after derivatization. Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung. 1988;187:535–540. [PubMed: 3223093] [CrossRef]
  • Karelová J, Jablonická A, Vargová M. Results of cytogenetic testing of workers exposed to ethylene oxide. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1987;31:119–126. [PubMed: 3611756]
  • Kauppinen T, Toikkanen J, Pedersen D, et al. Occupational exposure to carcinogens in the European Union. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2000;57:10–18. [PMC free article: PMC1739859] [PubMed: 10711264] [CrossRef]
  • Kolman A, Chovanec M, Osterman-Golkar S. Genotoxic effects of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and epichlorohydrin in humans: update review (1990–2001). Mutat Res. 2002;512:173–94. [PubMed: 12464351] [CrossRef]
  • Kreuzer PE (1992). Permeation kinetics of ethylene oxide in gaseous form and dissolved other matrices through the skin of rats, hamsters and humans. (GSF-Bericht 19/92), Neuherberg: GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit.
  • Lacson J (2003). CEH Marketing Research Report — Ethylene Oxide, Zurich: SRI Consulting.
  • Lerda D, Rizzi R. Cytogenetic study of persons occupationally exposed to ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1992;281:31–37. [PubMed: 1371589] [CrossRef]
  • Lide DR, editor (2008). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 89th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 3–408.
  • Liou SH, Lung JC, Chen YH, et al. Increased chromosome-type chromosome aberration frequencies as biomarkers of cancer risk in a blackfoot endemic area. Cancer Res. 1999;59:1481–1484. [PubMed: 10197617]
  • Lynch DW, Lewis TR, Moorman WJ, et al. Carcinogenic and toxicologic effects of inhaled ethylene oxide and propylene oxide in F344 rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1984;76:69–84. [PubMed: 6484993]
  • Major J, Jakab MG, Tompa A. Genotoxicological investigation of hospital nurses occupationally exposed to ethylene-oxide: I. Chromosome aberrations, sister-chromatid exchanges, cell cycle kinetics, and UV-induced DNA synthesis in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1996;27:84–92. [PubMed: 8603670] [CrossRef]
  • Major J, Jakab MG, Tompa A. The frequency of induced premature centromere division in human populations occupationally exposed to genotoxic chemicals. Mutat Res. 1999;445:241–249. [PubMed: 10575433]
  • Marsden DA, Jones DJ, Britton RG, Ognibene T, Ubick E, Johnson GE, et al. Dose-response relationships for N7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine induced by low-dose [14C]ethylene oxide: evidence for a novel mechanism of endogenous adduct formation. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3052–9. [PubMed: 19276345] [CrossRef]
  • Mayer J, Warburton D, Jeffrey AM, et al. Biologic markers in ethylene oxide-exposed workers and controls. Mutat Res. 1991;248:163–176. [PubMed: 2030705] [CrossRef]
  • Mortimer VD Jr, Kercher SL (1989). Control Technology for Ethylene Oxide Sterilization in Hospitals (NIOSH Publ. No. 89-120). Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health .
  • National Library of Medicine (2005). Hazardous Substances Data Bank Database, Bethesda, MD. Available at http://toxnet​.nlm.nih​.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search.
  • NIOSH (1990) National Occupational Exposure Survey (1981-1983), Cincinnati, OH, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. http://www​.cdc.gov/noes/noes2/32550occ​.html.
  • Norman SA, Berlin JA, Soper KA, et al. Cancer incidence in a group of workers potentially exposed to ethylene oxide. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1995;24:276–284. [PubMed: 7635586] [CrossRef]
  • NTP. NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Ethylene Oxide (CAS No. 75–21–8) in B6C3F1 Mice (Inhalation Studies). Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 1987;326:1–114. [PubMed: 12748727]
  • O’Neill MJ, editor (2006). The Merck Index, 14th ed. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc., p. 651.
  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2005). Regulatory Review of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Ethylene Oxide Standard (29 CFR 1910.1047), Washington DC.
  • Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Christiansen DH, Desta F, Andersen MK. Alternative genetic pathways and cooperating genetic abnormalities in the pathogenesis of therapy-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2006;20:1943–9. [PubMed: 16990778] [CrossRef]
  • Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Rowley JD. The balanced and the unbalanced chromosome aberrations of acute myeloid leukemia may develop in different ways and may contribute differently to malignant transformation. Blood. 1994;83:2780–2786. [PubMed: 8180374]
  • Pero RW, Widegren B, Högstedt B, Mitelman F. In vivo and in vitro ethylene oxide exposure of human lymphocytes assessed by chemical stimulation of unscheduled DNA synthesis. Mutat Res. 1981;83:271–289. [PubMed: 7300850] [CrossRef]
  • Picut CA, Aoyama H, Holder JW, et al. Bromoethane, chloroethane and ethylene oxide induced uterine neoplasms in B6C3F1 mice from 2-year NTP inhalation bioassays: pathology and incidence data revisited. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2003;55:1–9. [PubMed: 12940622]
  • Popp W, Vahrenholz C, Przygoda H, et al. DNA-protein cross-links and sister chromatid exchange frequencies in lymphocytes and hydroxyethyl mercapturic acid in urine of ethylene oxide-exposed hospital workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1994;66:325–332. [PubMed: 7896417] [CrossRef]
  • Recio L, Donner M, Abernethy D, et al. In vivo mutagenicity and mutation spectrum in the bone marrow and testes of B6C3F1 lacI transgenic mice following inhalation exposure to ethylene oxide. Mutagenesis. 2004;19:215–22. [PubMed: 15123787] [CrossRef]
  • Ribeiro LR, Salvadori DM, Rios AC, et al. Biological monitoring of workers occupationally exposed to ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1994;313:81–87. [PubMed: 8047079]
  • Richmond GW, Abrahams RH, Nemenzo JH, Hine CH. An evaluation of possible effects on health following exposure to ethylene oxide. Arch Environ Health. 1985;40:20–25. [PubMed: 3994416]
  • Sarto F, Cominato I, Pinton AM, et al. Workers exposed to ethylene oxide have increased incidence of sister chromatid exchange. IARC Sci Publ. 1984;59:413–419. a. [PubMed: 6545292]
  • Sarto F, Cominato I, Pinton AM, et al. Cytogenetic damage in workers exposed to ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1984;138:185–195. b. [PubMed: 6513974] [CrossRef]
  • Sarto F, Tomanin R, Giacomelli L, et al. The micronucleus assay in human exfoliated cells of the nose and mouth: application to occupational exposures to chromic acid and ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1990;244:345–351. [PubMed: 2385249] [CrossRef]
  • Sarto F, Törnqvist MA, Tomanin R, et al. Studies of biological and chemical monitoring of low-level exposure to ethylene oxide. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991;17:60–64. [PubMed: 2047808] [CrossRef]
  • Scheick C, Spiteller G, Dasenbrock C. Thiodiacetic acid–a metabolite of Ethylene oxide. Z Naturforsch C. 1997;52:70–76. [PubMed: 9090069]
  • Schulte PA, Boeniger M, Walker JT, et al. Biologic markers in hospital workers exposed to low levels of ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1992;278:237–251. [PubMed: 1373860] [CrossRef]
  • Shore RE, Gardner MJ, Pannett B. Ethylene oxide: an assessment of the epidemiological evidence on carcinogenicity. Br J Ind Med. 1993;50:971–997. [PMC free article: PMC1035533] [PubMed: 8280635]
  • Sisk SC, Pluta LJ, Meyer KG, et al. Assessment of the in vivo mutagenicity of ethylene oxide in the tissues of B6C3F1 lacI transgenic mice following inhalation exposure. Mutat Res. 1997;391:153–164. [PubMed: 9268040]
  • Smerhovsky Z, Landa K, Rössner P, Brabec M, Zudova Z, Hola N, et al. Risk of cancer in an occupationally exposed cohort with increased level of chromosomal aberrations. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:41–5. [PMC free article: PMC1242049] [PubMed: 11171523] [CrossRef]
  • Snellings WM, Weil CS, Maronpot RR. A two-year inhalation study of the carcinogenic potential of ethylene oxide in Fischer 344 rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1984;75:105–117. [PubMed: 6464016]
  • Stayner L, Steenland K, Greife A, et al. Exposure-response analysis of cancer mortality in a cohort of workers exposed to ethylene oxide. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138:787–798. [PubMed: 8237967]
  • Steenland K, Stayner L, Deddens J. Mortality analyses in a cohort of 18 235 ethylene oxide exposed workers: follow up extended from 1987 to 1998. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:2–7. [PMC free article: PMC1757803] [PubMed: 14691266]
  • Steenland K, Stayner L, Greife A, et al. Mortality among workers exposed to ethylene oxide. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1402–1407. [PubMed: 2020295]
  • Steenland K, Whelan E, Deddens J, et al. Ethylene oxide and breast cancer incidence in a cohort study of 7576 women (United States). Cancer Causes & Control. 2003;14:531–539. [PubMed: 12948284] [CrossRef]
  • Stolley PD, Soper KA, Galloway SM, et al. Sister-chromatid exchanges in association with occupational exposure to ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1984;129:89–102. [PubMed: 6493252] [CrossRef]
  • Swaen GM, Burns C, Teta JM, et al. Mortality study update of ethylene oxide workers in chemical manufacturing: a 15 year update. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51:714–723. [PubMed: 19430313] [CrossRef]
  • Swenberg JA, Fedtke N, Fennell TR, Walker VE (1990). Relationships between carcinogen exposure, DNA adducts and carcinogenesis. In: Progress in Predictive Toxicology. Clayson DB, Munro IC, Shubik P, Swenberg JA, editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publications, pp. 161–184.
  • Tates AD, Boogaard PJ, Darroudi F, et al. Biological effect monitoring in industrial workers following incidental exposure to high concentrations of ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1995;329:63–77. [PubMed: 7770077] [CrossRef]
  • Tates AD, Grummt T, Törnqvist M, et al. Biological and chemical monitoring of occupational exposure to ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1991;250:483–497. [PubMed: 1719390] [CrossRef]
  • Tates AD, van Dam FJ, Natarajan AT, et al. Measurement of HPRT mutations in splenic lymphocytes and haemoglobin adducts in erythrocytes of Lewis rats exposed to ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1999;431:397–415. [PubMed: 10636004]
  • Teta MJ, Benson LO, Vitale JN. Mortality study of ethylene oxide workers in chemical manufacturing: a 10 year update. Br J Ind Med. 1993;50:704–709. [PMC free article: PMC1012173] [PubMed: 8398856]
  • Teta MJ, Sielken RL Jr, Valdez-Flores C. Ethylene oxide cancer risk assessment based on epidemiological data: application of revised regulatory guidelines. Risk Anal. 1999;19:1135–1155. [PubMed: 10765453] [CrossRef]
  • Thier R, Balkenhol H, Lewalter J, et al. Influence of polymorphisms of the human glutathione transferases and cytochrome P450 2E1 enzyme on the metabolism and toxicity of ethylene oxide and acrylonitrile. Mutat Res. 2001;482:41–46. [PubMed: 11535247] [CrossRef]
  • Tompkins EM, McLuckie KIE, Jones DJL, et al. Mutagenicity of DNA adducts derived from ethylene oxide exposure in the pSP189 shuttle vector replicated in human Ad293 cells. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2009;678:129–37. [PubMed: 19477295] [CrossRef]
  • Valdez-Flores C, Sielken RL Jr, Teta MJ. Quantitative Cancer Risk Assessment based on NIOSH and UCC Epidemiological Data for Workers Exposed to Ethylene Oxide. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2010, 56:312-320. [PubMed: 19840826] [CrossRef]
  • Van Sittert NJ, de Jong G, Clare MG, et al. Cytogenetic, immunological, and haematological effects in workers in an ethylene oxide manufacturing plant. Br J Ind Med. 1985;42:19–26. [PMC free article: PMC1007411] [PubMed: 3965011]
  • Walker VE, Fennell TR, Upton PB, et al. Molecular dosimetry of ethylene oxide: formation and persistence of 7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine in DNA following repeated exposures of rats and mice. Cancer Res. 1992;52:4328–4334. PMID​:1643630 [PubMed: 1643630]
  • Walker VE, Meng Q, Clement NL. Spectra of mutations in hprt exon 3 of T-cells from F344 rats and lacI transgenic and nontransgenic B6C3F1 mice exposed by inhalation to ethylene oxide. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 1997;29 Suppl. 28:54. b.
  • Walker VE, Sisk SC, Upton PB, et al. In vivo mutagenicity of ethylene oxide at the hprt locus in T-lymphocytes of B6C3F1 lacI transgenic mice following inhalation exposure. Mutat Res. 1997;392:211–222. a. [PubMed: 9294020]
  • Walker VE, Skopek TR. A mouse model for the study of in vivo mutational spectra: sequence specificity of ethylene oxide at the hprt locus. Mutat Res. 1993;288:151–162. [PubMed: 7686258]
  • WHO (2003). Ethylene Oxide (Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 54), Geneva. Available at http://www.inchem.org.
  • Wolfs P, Dutrieux M, Scailteur V, et al. [Monitoring of workers exposed to ethylene oxide in a plant distributing sterilizing gases and in units for sterilizing medical equipment (Fre.). Archives des Maladies Professionnelles. 1983;44:321–328.
  • Yager JW, Hines CJ, Spear RC. Exposure to ethylene oxide at work increases sister chromatid exchanges in human peripheral lymphocytes. Science. 1983;219:1221–1223. [PubMed: 6828851] [CrossRef]
© International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2012. For more information contact publications@iarc.fr.
Bookshelf ID: NBK304417

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (7.0M)

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...