NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Research Council (US) Committee on Capitalizing on Science, Technology, and Innovation: An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2004.

Cover of An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology

An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology.

Show details

EBibliography

  1. Acs Z, Audretsch D. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991.
  2. Alic JA, Branscomb L, Brooks H, Carter Ashton B, Epstein Gerald L. Beyond Spinoff: Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1992.
  3. Arrow K. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1962. "Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention"; pp. 609–625.
  4. Arrow K. "The theory of discrimination". In: Ashenfelter O, Rees A, editors. Discrimination In Labor Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1973. pp. 3–31.
  5. Audretsch DB. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
  6. Audretsch DB, Feldman Maryann P. "R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production". American Economic Review. 1996;86(3):630–640.
  7. Audretsch DB, Stephan Paula E. "Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology". American Economic Review. 1996;86(3):641–642.
  8. Audretsch D, Thurik R. Innovation, Industry Evolution, and Employment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.
  9. Barfield C, Schambra W, editors. The Politics of Industrial Policy. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research; 1986.
  10. Baron J. “DoD SBIR/STTR Program Manager”. Comments at the Methodology Workshop on the Assessment of Current SBIR Program Initiatives; Washington, D.C. Oct, 1998.
  11. Barry CB. “New directions in research on venture capital finance” Financial Management. 1994;23(Autumn):3–15.
  12. Bator F. “The anatomy of market failure” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1958;72:351–379.
  13. Bingham R. Industrial Policy American Style: From Hamilton to HDTV. New York: M.E. Sharpe; 1998.
  14. Birch D. “Who Creates Jobs” The Public Interest. 1981;65(Fall):3–14.
  15. Branscomb LM, Morse Kenneth P, Roberts Michael J, Boville D. Managing Technical Risk: Understanding Private Sector Decision Making on Early Stage Technology Based Projects. Washington, D.C: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce; 2000.
  16. Branscomb LM, Auerswald Philip E. Taking Technical Risks: How Innovators, Managers, and Investors Manage Risk in High-Tech Innovations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001.
  17. Branscomb LM, Keller J. Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
  18. Brav A, Gompers PA. “Myth or reality?: Long-run underperformance of initial public offerings; Evidence from venture capital and nonventure capital-backed IPOs” Journal of Finance. 1997;52:1791–1821.
  19. Brown G, Turner J. “Reworking the Federal Role in Small Business Research” Issues in Science and Technology. 1999;(Summer):51–58.
  20. Bush V. Science—the Endless Frontier. Washington, D.C: 1946. Republished in 1960 by U.S. National Science Foundation.
  21. Caballero RJ, Jaffe Adam B. “How high are the giants' shoulders: an empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth” In: Blanchard OJ, Fischer S, editors. NBER Macroeconomic Annual 1993. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1993.
  22. Caves RE. “Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms” Journal of Economic Literature. 1998;36(4):1947–1982.
  23. Clinton William Jefferson. Economic Report of the President. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1994.
  24. Coburn C, Bergland D. Partnerships: A Compendium of State and Federal Cooperative Technology Programs. Columbus, OH: Battelle; 1995.
  25. Cohen LR, Noll RG. The Technology Pork Barrel. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution; 1991.
  26. Cooper RS. Purpose and performance of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. Small Business Economics. 20:137–151.
  27. Council of Economic Advisers. Supporting Research and Development to Promote Economic Gowth: The Federal Government's Role. Washington, D.C.: 1995.
  28. David P, Hall B, Toole A. “Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence” Research Policy. 2000;29(4-5):497–530.
  29. Davis SJ, Haltiwanger J, Schuh S. “Small Business and Job Creation: Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing the Facts” Business Economics. 1994;29(3):113–22.
  30. Dertouzos M. Made in America: The MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press: 1989.
  31. Eckstein. DRI Report on U.S. Manufacturing Industries. New York: McGraw Hill; 1984.
  32. Eisinger PK. The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State: State and Local Economic Development Policy in the United State. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1988.
  33. Feldman MP. “Knowledge complementarity and innovation” Small Business Economics. 1994a;6(5):363–372.
  34. Feldman MP. The Geography of Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 1994b.
  35. Feldman MP, Kelley Maryellen R. “Leveraging Research and Development: Assessing the Impact of the U.S. Advanced Technology Program” Small Business Economics. 2003;20(2)
  36. Fenn GW, Liang N, Prowse S. The Economics of the Private Equity Market. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; 1995.
  37. Flamm K. Creating the Computer. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution; 1988.
  38. Freear J, Wetzel WE Jr. “Who bankrolls high-tech entrepreneurs?” Journal of Business Venturing. 1990;5:77–89.
  39. Freeman C, Soete L. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997.
  40. Galbraith JK. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1957.
  41. Gans JS, Stern S. When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit?: Evidence from the SBIR program. Economic Innovation and New Technology. 2003;12(4):361–384.
  42. Garcia-Quevedo J. “Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence” Kyklos. 2004;57
  43. Geroski PA. "What do we know about entry?". International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1995;13(4):421–440.
  44. Gompers PA. “Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital” Journal of Finance. 1995;50:1461–1489.
  45. Gompers PA, Lerner J. “The use of covenants: An empirical analysis of venture partnership agreements” Journal of Law and Economics. 1996;39:463–498.
  46. Gompers PA, Lerner J. “An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture capital partnership” Journal of Financial Economics. 1999;51(1):3–7.
  47. Gompers PA, Lerner J. Harvard University; 1998a. “Capital formation and investment in venture markets: A report to the NBER and the Advanced Technology Program” Unpublished working paper.
  48. Gompers PA, Lerner J. Harvard University; 1998b. “What drives venture capital fund-raising?” Unpublished working paper.
  49. Gompers PA, Lerner J. The Venture Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.
  50. Good ML. Prepared testimony before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space (Photocopy, U.S. Department of Commerce) 1995
  51. Graham OL. Losing Time: The Industrial Policy Debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992.
  52. Greenwald BC, Stiglitz JE, Weiss A. “Information imperfections in the capital market and macroeconomic fluctuations” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings. 1984;74:194–199.
  53. Griliches Z. The Search for R&D Spillovers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990.
  54. Hall BH. Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley; 1992. “Investment and research and development: Does the source of financing matter?” Working Paper No. 92-194.
  55. Hall BH. “Industrial research during the 1980s: Did the rate of return fall?” Brookings Papers: Microeconomics. 1993;2:289–343.
  56. Hamberg Dan. “Invention in the industrial research laboratory” Journal of Political Economy. 1963;(April):95–115.
  57. Hao KY, Jaffe AB. “Effect of liquidity on firms' R&D spending” Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 1993;2:275–282.
  58. Hebert RF, Link Albert N. “In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship” Small Business Economics. 1989;1(1):39–49.
  59. Himmelberg CP, Petersen BC. “R&D and internal finance: A panel study of small firms in high-tech industries” Review of Economics and Statistics. 1994;76:38–51.
  60. Hubbard RG. “Capital-market imperfections and investment” Journal of Economic Literature. 1998;36:193–225.
  61. Huntsman B, Hoban JP Jr. “Investment in new enterprise: Some empirical observations on risk, return, and market structure” Financial Management. 1980;9(Summer):44–51.
  62. Jaffe AB. Washington, D.C.: Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce; 1996. “Economic analysis of research spillovers—Implications for the Advanced Technology Program”
  63. Jaffe AB. “The importance of 'spillovers' in the policy mission of the Advanced Technology Program” Journal of Technology Transfer. 1998;(Summer)
  64. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002.
  65. Jewkes J, Sawers D, Stillerman R. The Sources of Invention. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1958.
  66. Kleinman DL. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1995.
  67. Kortum Samuel, Lerner Josh. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc; 1998. “Does Venture Capital Spur Innovation?” NBER Working Papers 6846.
  68. Krugman P. Rethinking International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990.
  69. Krugman P. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991.
  70. Lach S. “Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of Industrial Economics. 2002 December:369–390.
  71. Langlois RN, Robertson Paul L. “Stop Crying over Spilt Knowledge: A Critical Look at the Theory of Spillovers and Technical Change”. Paper prepared for the MERIT Conference on Innovation, Evolution, and Technology; Maastricht, Netherlands. August 25-27.1996.
  72. Lebow I. Information Highways and Byways: From the Telegraph to the 21st Century. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering; 1995.
  73. Lerner J. “The syndication of venture capital investments” Financial Management. 1994;23(Autumn):16–27.
  74. Lerner J. “Venture capital and the oversight of private firms” Journal of Finance. 1995;50:301–318.
  75. Lerner J. National Bureau of Economic Research; 1996. “The government as venture capitalist: The long-run effects of the SBIR program” Working paper no. 5753.
  76. Lerner J. “Angel financing and public policy: An overview” Journal of Banking and Finance. 1998;22(6– 8):773–784.
  77. Lerner J. “The government as venture capitalist: The long-run effects of the SBIR program” Journal of Business. 1999;72(3):285–297.
  78. Lerner J. SBIR: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1999. “Public venture capital: Rationales and evaluation,”
  79. Levy DM, Terleckyk N. “Effects of government R&D on private R&D investment and productivity: A macroeconomic analysis” Bell Journal of Economics. 1983;14:551–561.
  80. Liles P. Sustaining the Venture Capital Firm. Cambridge, MA: Management Analysis Center; 1977.
  81. Link AN. “Public/Private Partnerships as a Tool to Support Industrial R&D: Experiences in the United States”. Paper prepared for the working group on Innovation and Technology Policy of the OECD Committee for Science and Technology Policy; Paris. 1998.
  82. Link AN, Scott John T. Overcoming Market Failure: A Case Study of the ATP Focused Program on Technologies for the Integration of Manufacturing Applications (TIMA). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Technology; Oct, 1998a. Draft final report submitted to the Advanced Technology Program.
  83. Link AN, Scott John T. “Assessing the infrastructural needs of a technology-based service sector: A new approach to technology policy planning” STI Review. 1998b;22:171–207.
  84. Link AN, Scott John T. Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic; 1998c.
  85. Link AN, Rees J. “Firm size, university based research and the returns to R&D” Small Business Economics. 1990;2(1):25–32.
  86. Malone T. The Microprocessor: A Biography. Hamburg, Germany: Springer Verlag/Telos; 1995.
  87. Mansfield E, Rapoport J, Romeo A, Wagner S, Beardsley G. “Social and private rates of return from industrial innovations” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1977;91:221–240.
  88. Mansfield E. “How Fast Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?” Journal of Industrial Economics. 1985;34(2)
  89. Mansfield E. Estimating Social and Private Returns from Innovations Based on the Advanced Technology Program: Problems and Opportunities. 1996 Unpublished report.
  90. Martin J. “David Birch” Fortune Small Business. 2002 December 1
  91. McCraw T. Mercantilism and the market: antecedents of American industrial policy. In: Barfield C, Schambra W, editors. The Politics of Industrial Policy. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research; 1986.
  92. Mervis JD. “A $1 Billion 'Tax' on R&D Funds” Science. 1996;272:942–944. [PubMed: 8638132]
  93. Mowery D. “Collaborative R&D: how effective is it,” Issues in Science and Technology. 1998;(Fal):37–44.
  94. Mowery D, Rosenberg N. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
  95. Mowery D, Rosenberg N. Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
  96. Myers S, Stern RL, Rorke ML. Lake Forest, Illinois: Mohawk Research Corporation; 1983. A Study of the Small Business Innovation Research Program.
  97. Myers SC, Majluf N. “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have,” Journal of Financial Economics. 1984;13:187–221.
  98. National Research Council. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1986.
  99. National Research Council. Semiconductor Industry and the National Laboratories: Part of a National Strategy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1987.
  100. National Research Council. Mathematical Sciences, Technology, and Economic Competitiveness. Glimm G, editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1991.
  101. National Research Council. Allocating Federal Funds for R&D. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1995.
  102. National Research Council. Conflict and Cooperation in National Competition for High-Technology Industry. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1996.
  103. National Research Council. Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Third Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1997.
  104. National Research Council. The Advanced Technology Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Wessner Charles W., editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1999.
  105. National Research Council. Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1999.
  106. National Research Council. Industry-Laboratory Partnerships: A Review of the Sandia Science and Technology Park Initiative. Wessner Charles W., editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1999.
  107. National Research Council. New Vistas in Transatlantic Science and Technology Cooperation. Wessner Charles W., editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1999.
  108. National Research Council. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Wessner Charles W., editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1999.
  109. National Research Council. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: A Review of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative. Wessner Charles W., editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2000.
  110. National Research Council. U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance. Mowery David C., editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2000.
  111. National Research Council. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Wessner Charles W., editor. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
  112. National Research Council. Attracting Science and Mathematics PhDs to Secondary School Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
  113. National Research Council. Building a Workforce for the Information Economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
  114. National Research Council. Capitalizing on New Needs and New Opportunities: Government-Industry Partnerships in Biotechnology and Information Technologies. Wessner Charles W., editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001. [PubMed: 24967478]
  115. National Research Council. A Review of the New Initiatives at the NASA Ames Research Center. Wessner Charles W., editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
  116. National Research Council. Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
  117. National Research Council. Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy Research 1978 to 2000. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
  118. National Research Council. Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies: Summary Report. Wessner Charles W., editor. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2002.
  119. National Research Council. Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy. Jorgenson Dale W, Wessner Charles W., editors. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2002.
  120. Nelson RR. New York: Pergamon; 1982. Government and Technological Progress.
  121. Nelson RR. “Institutions supporting technical advances in industry”. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings; 1986. p. 188.
  122. Nelson RR, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. National Innovation System: A Comparative Study.
  123. Office of the President. U.S. Technology Policy. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President; 1990.
  124. Office of Management and Budget. Economic analysis of federal regulations under Executive Order 12866. Mimeo; 1996.
  125. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Innovation in Small and Medium Firms. Paris: OECD; 1982.
  126. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Small Business Job Creation and Growth: Facts, Obstacles, and Best Practices. Paris: OECD; 1997.
  127. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Technology, Productivity and Job Creation: Toward Best Policy Practice. Paris: OECD; 1998.
  128. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Venture capital in OECD countries. Paris: OECD; 1995.
  129. Perret G. New York: Random House; 1989. A Country Made by War: From the Revolution to Vietnam—The Story of America's Rise to Power.
  130. Powell WW, Brantley P. “Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning through networks?” In: Nohria N, Eccles RG, editors. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1992. pp. 366–394.
  131. Waterhouse P. Washington, D.C.: Small Business High Technology Institute; 1985. Survey of small high-tech businesses shows Federal SBIR awards spurring job growth, commercial sales.
  132. Roberts EB. "Entrepreneurship and technology” Research Management. 1968;(July):249–266.
  133. Romer P. “Endogenous technological change” Journal of Political Economy. 1990;98:71–102.
  134. Rosenbloom R, Spencer W. Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research at the End of an Era. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 1996.
  135. Rubenstein AH. Boston Mass.: Federal Reserve Bank; 1958. Problems Financing New Research-Based Enterprises in New England.
  136. Sahlman WA. “The structure and governance of venture capital organizations” Journal of Financial Economics. 1990;27:473–521.
  137. Saxenian A. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994.
  138. Scherer FM. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. New York: Rand McNally College Publishing; 1970.
  139. Scott JT. Environmental Research and Development: US Industrial Research, the Clean Air Act and Environmental Damage. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2003.
  140. Siegel DS, Waldman D, Youngdahl W. “The Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies: Human Resource Management Implications,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1997 August;44(3):288–298.
  141. Small Business Administration. Small Business Innovation Development Act: Tenth-Year Results. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (and earlier years); 1994.
  142. Small Business Administration. Results of Three-Year Commercialization Study of the SBIR progam. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1992.
  143. Stiglitz JE, Weiss A. “Credit rationing in markets with incomplete information” American Economic Review. 1981;71:393–409.
  144. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row; 1950.
  145. Scott JT. “Financing and leveraging public/private partnerships: The hurdle-lowering auction” STI Review. 1998;23:67–84.
  146. Sohl J. Venture Capital. 1999;1(2)
  147. Sohl J, Freear J, Wetzel WE Jr. “Angles on Angels: Financing Technology-Based Ventures - An Historical Perspective” Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance. 2002;4(4)
  148. Stiglitz JE, Weiss A. “Credit rationing in markets with incomplete information” Ameircan Economic Review. 1981;71:393–409.
  149. Stowsky J. Mimeo: University of California; 1996. “Politics and Policy: The Technology Reinvestment Program and the Dilemmas of Dual Use”
  150. Tassey G. The Economics of R&D Policy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books; 1997.
  151. Tirman J. The Militarization of High Technology. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1984.
  152. Tyson Laura, Petrin T, Rogers H. “Promoting entrepreneurship in Eastern Europe” Small Business Economics. 1994;6:165–184.
  153. U.S. Congress, House. SBIR and Commercialization: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Technology and Competitiveness of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, on the Small Business Innovation Research [SBIR] Program. (testimony of James A. Block, President of Creare Inc.); 1992. pp. 356–361.
  154. U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Small Business. Small Business Research Act of 1981. S.R. 194, 97th Congress; 1981.
  155. U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Small Business. Small Business Research Act of 1981. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; Sep 25, 1981. Senate Report 97–194.
  156. U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Small Business. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; Aug 4, 1999. Senate Report 106–330.
  157. U.S. Congressional Budget Office. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congressional Budget Office; 1985. Federal financial support for high-technology industries.
  158. U.S. General Accounting Office. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1987. Federal research: Small Business Innovation Research participants give program high marks.
  159. U.S. General Accounting Office. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1989. Federal research: Assessment of Small Business Innovation Research program.
  160. U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: DoD's Small Business Innovation Research Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1997. RCED–97–122.
  161. U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: Evaluations of Small Business Innovation Research Can Be Strengthened. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1999. RCED–99–198.
  162. U. S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: Observations on the Small Business Innovation Research Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1998. RCED–98–132.
  163. U.S. General Accounting Office. Small Business Innovation Research Shows Success But Can Be Strengthened. Washington, D.C.: U.S General Accounting Office; 1992. RCED–92–32.
  164. U.S. Small Business Administration. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1994. Small Business Innovation Development Act: Tenth-year results.
  165. Small Business Administration. SBA Office of Advocacy; May, 2003. “Small Business by the Numbers”
  166. Venture Economics. Exiting venture capital investments. Wellesley, MA: Venture Economics; 1988.
  167. Venture Economics. “Special Report: Rose-colored asset class” Venture Capital Journal. 1996;36(July):32–34.
  168. VentureOne. San Francisco: VentureOne; 1997. National Venture Capital Association 1996 annual report.
  169. Wallsten SJ. The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. Rand Journal of Economics. 2000;31(1)
  170. Wallsten SJ. “Rethinking the Small Business Innovation Research Program,” In: Branscomb, Keller, editors. Investing In Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1998.
  171. Wallsten SJ. Stanford University; 1996. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Encouraging Technological Innovation and Commercialization in Small Firms. Unpublished working paper.
Copyright © 2004, National Academy of Sciences.
Bookshelf ID: NBK25489

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.1M)

Related information

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...