NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Research Council (US) Committee on Bridges to Independence: Identifying Opportunities for and Challenges to Fostering the Independence of Young Investigators in the Life Sciences. Bridges to Independence: Fostering the Independence of New Investigators in Biomedical Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2005.

Cover of Bridges to Independence

Bridges to Independence: Fostering the Independence of New Investigators in Biomedical Research.

Show details

References

  1. Alberts BM. Limits to growth: In biology, small science is good science. Cell. 1985;41(2, June):337–338. [PubMed: 3986906]
  2. Alberts B. Harnessing Science for a More Rational World. 2003 President's Address, 140th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Sciences; April 23, 2003; Washington, DC. 2003. http://www4​.nationalacademies​.org/nas/nashome​.nsf/urllinks/NAS5LWKA9.
  3. American Cancer Society, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute(ACS/BWF/HHMI) . The Role of the Private Sector in Training the Next Generation of Biomedical Scientists. Proceedings of a conference sponsored by the American Cancer Society, the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute; February 2000.2000.
  4. Association of American Universities (AAU) Committee on Postdoctoral Education: Report and Recommendations; March 31, 1998; 1998. http://www​.aau.edu/reports/Postdocrpt​.html.
  5. Babco E. Data on Postdoctoral Experiences. Presentation at NIH meeting on Post Docs: Training and Opportunities in the 21st Century; October 23–24, 2003; Bethesda, MD. 2003.
  6. Brainard J. What the NIH bought with double the money. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2004;50(22, February 6):A17.
  7. Burroughs Wellcome Fund (BWF) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Making the Right Moves: A Practical Guide to Scientific Management for Postdocs and New Faculty. Research Triangle Park, NC: Burroughs Wellcome Fund; and Chevy Chase, MD: Howard Hughes Medical Institute; 2004. http://www​.hhmi.org/labmanagement.
  8. Carlson LT. Meeting the Data Needs: Opportunities and Challenges at the National Science Foundation Chapter 9. In: Kelly Terrence K, Butz William P, Carroll S, Adamson David M, Bloom G., editors. The U.S. Scientific and Technical Workforce: Improving Data for Decisionmaking. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, CF-194-OSTP/SF; June , 2004. pp. 69–81.
  9. Check E. David versus Goliath. Nature. 2004;432(7017, 2 December):546–548. [PubMed: 15577877]
  10. Coleman J. NIH Extra Grant Review: “Is 9 Months Too Long?” Zerhouni Asks. Washington Fax. Jan 28, 2005.
  11. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) Reshaping the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/4935.html.
  12. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers: A Guide for Postdoctoral Scholars, Advisers, Institutions, Funding Organizations, and Disciplinary Societies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/9831.html.
  13. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research; Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/11153.html.
  14. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) Molecular Medicine 2020: A Vision for the Future of Medical Research and Human Health. 1998. http://www​.faseb.org​/opa/MolecularMedicine.html.
  15. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) FASEB policy statement on postdoctoral training. Apr 3, 2001. http://www.faseb.org/opartrain_ pol.html.
  16. Finn MG. Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities, 2001. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education; 2003. http://www​.orau.gov/orise​/pubs/stayrate03.pdf.
  17. Freeman RB. Data! Data! My Kingdom for Data! Data Needs for Analyzing the S&E Job Market Chapter 5. In: Kelly Terrence K, Butz William P, Carroll S, Adamson David M, Bloom G., editors. The U.S. Scientific and Technical Workforce: Improving Data for Decisionmaking. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, CF-194-OSTP/SF; Jun, 2004. pp. 32–44.
  18. Freeman R, Weinstein E, Marincola E, Rosenbaum J, Solomon F. Competition and careers in biosciences. Science. 2001;294(5550, 14 December):2293–2294. [PubMed: 11743184]
  19. Garrison HH, Gerbi Susan A, Kincade Paul W. In an era of scientific opportunity, are there opportunities for biomedical scientists? FASEB Journal. 2003;17(15, December):2169–2173. [PubMed: 14525935]
  20. Gerbi SA, Garrison Howard H, Perkins John P. Workforce alternatives to graduate students? Science. 2001;292(5521, 25 May):1489–1490. [PubMed: 11379627]
  21. Goldman E, Marshall E. NIH grantees: Where have all the young ones gone? Science. 2002;298(5591, 4 October):40–41. [PubMed: 12364762]
  22. Hawkins A. New investigators majority of 2001–2003 new grant applicants, NIGMS Director Berg reports. Washington Fax. Sep 15, 2004.
  23. Henry CM. Improving the postdoc. Chemical & Engineering News. 2004;82(4, January 26):47–48.
  24. Institute of Medicine. Funding Health Sciences Research: A Strategy to Restore Balance. Committee on Policies for Allocating Health Sciences Research Funds; Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/1625.html.
  25. Jenkins SC. Nobel laureates meet with Bush Administration officials on research funding. Washington Fax. Nov 25, 2003.
  26. Jenkins SC. Funding for National Research Service postdoc benefits hard to find, NIH says. Washington Fax. Jan 22, 2004.
  27. Kelly TK, Butz William P, Carroll S, Adamson David M, Bloom G, editors. The U.S. Scientific and Technical Workforce: Improving Data for Decisionmaking. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, CF-194-OSTP/SF; Jun, 2004.
  28. Klotz E. Postdocs Are Not All Created Equal—Postdoc Status, Part 1. Science's Next Wave. Nov 10, 2000. http://nextwave​.sciencemag​.org/cgi/content​/full/2000/11/08/12.
  29. Laas M. NIBIB Council Eyes Young Investigator Grant Application Assistance. Washington Fax. Feb 1, 2005.
  30. Levin SG, Stephan Paula E. Are the Foreign Born a Source of Strength for U.S. Science? Science. 1999;285(5431, 20 August):1213–1214.
  31. Liu M, Mallon William T. Tenure in Transition: Trends in Basic Science Faculty Appointment Policies at U.S. Medical Schools. Academic Medicine. 2004;79(3, March):205–213. [PubMed: 14985192]
  32. Lucille P. Markey Charitable Trust. Final Report, 1983–1996. 1996.
  33. Malik KF, Pion G. Reorganization of Peer Review for the Neurosciences at the Center for Scientific Review (CSR): A Retrospective Evaluation. Jul 3, 2003. http://www​.csr.nih.gov​/EVENTS/Neuroscience​_Evaluation_7_03_03.pdf.
  34. Marincola E, Solomon F. The career structure in biomedical research: Implications for training and trainees. The American Society for Cell Biology Survey on the State of the Profession. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 1998a;9(November):3003–3006. [PMC free article: PMC25580] [PubMed: 9802891]
  35. Marincola E, Solomon F. Training for today's marketplace. Science. 1998b;281(5377, 31 July):645. [PubMed: 9714672]
  36. Mervis J. Risky business. Science. 2004a;306(5694, 8 October):220–221. [PubMed: 15472055]
  37. Mervis J. New NIH Training Grants Open to Foreign Students. Science. 2004b;304(5673, 14 May):942. [PubMed: 15143248]
  38. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Report of the NIH Working Group on New Investigators. Jun 4, 1997. http://www​.nigms.nih​.gov/news/reports/newinves.html.
  39. National Institutes of Health (NIH) NIH Statement in Response to the NAS Report: Addressing the Nation's Changing Needs for Biomedical and Behavioral Scientists. 2001. Notice NOT-OD-01-027, released March 22, 2001 http://grants​.nih.gov​/grants/guide/notice-files​/NOT-OD-01-027.html.
  40. National Postdoctoral Association (NPA) Policy Recommendations to the National Institutes of Health. 2003. http://www​.nationalpostdoc​.org/white_paper.
  41. National Research Council. The Funding of Young Investigators in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences. Committee on the Funding of Young Investigators in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences; Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1994. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/4746.html.
  42. National Research Council. Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists. Committee on Dimensions, Causes, and Implications of Recent Trends in Careers of Life Scientists; Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/6244.html.
  43. National Research Council. Addressing the Nation's Changing Needs for Biomedical and Behavioral Scientists; Committee on National Needs for Biomedical and Behavioral Scientists; Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/9827.html.
  44. National Research Council. Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs: A Methodology Study. In: Ostriker Jeremiah P, Kuh Charlotte V., editors. Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs; Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/10859.html. [PubMed: 20669476]
  45. National Research Council. Advancing the Nation's Health Needs: NIH Research Training Programs. Committee for Monitoring the Nation's Changing Needs for Biomedical, Behavioral, and Clinical Personnel; Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/11275.html. [PubMed: 20669451]
  46. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (NRC/IOM) Enhancing the Vitality of the National Institutes of Health: Organizational Change to Meet New Challenges. Committee on the Organizational Structure of the National Institutes of Health; Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. http://www​.nap.edu/catalog/10779.html. [PubMed: 20669477]
  47. National Science Board. Two volumes. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. (volume 1, NSB 04-1; volume 2, NSB 04-1A)
  48. National Science Foundation (NSF) Postdoctoral Appointments: Roles and Opportunities—A Report on an NSF Workshop; May 11–13, 2003; Arlington, VA. 2003. http://www​.MerrimackLLC​.com/2003/postdoc-workshop.html.
  49. National Science Foundation (NSF) Postdoctoral Appointments: Policies and Practices— Report On a Workshop; November 15–17, 2004; Arlington, VA. 2004. http://www​.MerrimackLLC​.com/2004/postdoc-workshop.html.
  50. Petsko GA. A piece of the action. Genome Biology. 2001 November 22;2(12) [PMC free article: PMC138986] [PubMed: 11790246]
  51. Pion G, Ionescu-Pioggia M. Bridging postdoctoral training and a faculty position: Initial outcomes of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Awards in the Biomedical Sciences. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(2, February):177–186. [PubMed: 12584096]
  52. Russo E. Victims of success. Nature. 2003;422(6929, 20 March):354–355. [PubMed: 12646932]
  53. Singer M. The evolution of postdocs. Science. 2004;306(5694, 8 October):232. [PubMed: 15472063]
  54. Stephen PE, Levin Sharon G. Age and the Nobel Prize revisited. Scientometrics. 1993;28(3):387–399.
  55. Stephan PE, Levin Sharon G. Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated. Population Research and Policy Review. 2001;20(1–2, April):59–79.
Copyright © 2005, National Academy of Sciences.
Bookshelf ID: NBK22683

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (5.1M)

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...