NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Pain--it is the most common complaint presented to physicians. Yet pain is subjective--it cannot be measured directly and is difficult to validate. Evaluating claims based on pain poses major problems for the Social Security Administration (SSA) and other disability insurers. This volume covers the epidemiology and physiology of pain; psychosocial contributions to pain and illness behavior; promising ways of assessing and measuring chronic pain and dysfunction; clinical aspects of prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation; and how the SSA's benefit structure and administrative procedures may affect pain complaints.
Contents
- INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
- PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- SUMMARY
- 1. Introduction
- PART I. THE PROBLEM OF PAIN FOR THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
- PART II. THE EXTENT AND COST OF THE PROBLEM
- PART III. INFLUENCES ON PAIN AND PAIN BEHAVIOR
- PART IV. ASSESSING AND TREATING PAIN AND DYSFUNCTION
- 10. Chronic Pain in Medical Practice
- 11. Measuring Pain And Dysfunction
- 12. Rehabilitation Approaches And Issues In Chronic Pain
- The Rehabilitation Approach
- Pain Management Programs: an Overview
- Rehabilitation Techniques for Patients with Chronic Pain
- Outcomes of Pain Management Programs
- Employment and Compensation as Incentives or Disincentives in Outcomes of Pain Management Programs
- Rehabilitation Issues Important to the Ssa
- References
- PART V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 13. Conclusions and Recommendations
- Recommendation 1 Data Collection at the SSA
- Recommendation 2 No New Listings for Pain or Illness Behavior
- Recommendation 3 Significant Pain' Should Trigger an Assessment
- Recommendation 4 Demonstration Projects
- Recommendation 5 Research Agenda
- Recommendation 6 Education to Improve the Clinical Care and Treatment of Chronic Pain Patients
- 13. Conclusions and Recommendations
- APPENDIX MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROMES DUE TO TRIGGER POINTS
This volume is the final report of a study conducted under Contract No. 600-85-0263 with the Social Security Administration, Department of Health and Human Services.
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
The Institute of Medicine was chartered in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to enlist distinguished members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. In this, the Institute acts under both the Academy's 1863 congressional charter responsibility to be an adviser to the federal government and its own initiative in identifying issues of medical care, research, and education.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Results of the Office of Policy's 2001 User Satisfaction Survey.[Soc Secur Bull. 2001]Results of the Office of Policy's 2001 User Satisfaction Survey.Waldron H. Soc Secur Bull. 2001-2002; 64(4):33-47.
- The effect of welfare reform on SSA's disability programs: design of policy evaluation and early evidence.[Soc Secur Bull. 2000]The effect of welfare reform on SSA's disability programs: design of policy evaluation and early evidence.Davies P, Iams H, Rupp K. Soc Secur Bull. 2000; 63(1):3-11.
- The development and use of industry data by the Social Security Administration.[Soc Secur Bull. 1992]The development and use of industry data by the Social Security Administration.Dill LM. Soc Secur Bull. 1992 Winter; 55(4):43-52.
- Review Mental Retardation: Determining Eligibility for Social Security Benefits[ 2002]Review Mental Retardation: Determining Eligibility for Social Security BenefitsNational Research Council (US) Committee on Disability Determination for Mental Retardation, Reschly DJ, Myers TG, Hartel CR. 2002
- Review Review of Disability Evaluation Study Design: Third Interim Report[ 1999]Review Review of Disability Evaluation Study Design: Third Interim ReportInstitute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Wunderlich GS, Kalsbeek WD. 1999
- Pain and DisabilityPain and Disability
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...