NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Bast RC Jr, Kufe DW, Pollock RE, et al., editors. Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. 5th edition. Hamilton (ON): BC Decker; 2000.
Hormones of the Adrenal Cortex
For nearly 50 years, cortisol and its synthetic analogues have been in widespread clinical use for the treatment of a variety of disorders. During this time, research has greatly expanded our understanding of the physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology of steroids, resulting in numerous publications which discuss the therapeutic uses and toxicologic hazards of corticosteroids. This chapter will review the physiologic and pharmacologic actions of corticosteroids and then discuss the use of these agents in the treatment of neoplasms. Finally, the current understanding of the mechanism of action of these hormones will be considered in the context of their therapeutic efficacy.
In the 1850s, observations by Addison1 of patients with destructive diseases of the adrenal gland and experiments done by Brown-Séquard2 on adrenalectomized animals revealed the requirement of functional adrenal glands for survival. By the 1930s, the effects of adrenal insufficiency were found to be separable into two distinct categories: those due to electrolyte imbalances and those resulting from altered carbohydrate metabolism.3,4 In 1932, Cushing5 described the syndrome of hypercorticism, and in the 1940s and 1950s, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) was discovered in the anterior pituitary, and its role in the stimulation of the adrenal cortex was demonstrated.6,7 ACTH release was found to be regulated by, a precise balance between negative feedback by adrenal corticosteroids and positive stimulation from the nervous system. Both these effects are mediated at the level of the hypothalamus and pituitary.8 Concurrently, several bioactive steroids were isolated from the adrenal cortex and their structures elucidated. These newly characterized steroids included cortisol and aldosterone, the principal active corticosteroids in humans.
In 1949, Hench9 reported the efficacy of cortisol and ACTH in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. This observation evoked wide interest, and therapeutic applications of these hormones were subsequently extended to a wide variety of diseases. This surge in clinical investigation was accompanied by a rapid expansion of the basic scientific examination of these compounds. During the 1950s, most of the biochemistry involved in the synthesis and metabolism of adrenocortical steroids was elucidated, and the majority of synthetic corticosteroid analogues available today were developed. Along with these advances, practical methods for plasma cortisol determinations were developed, allowing rapid advances in the field of corticosteroid therapy.
Eventually, synthetic adrenocorticosteroid analogues which separated anti-inflammatory potency from effects on electrolyte balance were developed. However, despite continuing efforts, chemists have not yet effectively separated desirable clinical effectiveness from toxicity. Consequently, these drugs are very powerful, yet have slow cumulative toxic side effects on many tissues. Therefore, damage resulting from corticosteroid therapy may not be apparent until made manifest in a catastrophic manner.
Adrenal Anatomy
The adrenal cortex is composed of three zones, the divisions of which are not clear-cut in humans. The outermost zona glomerulosa is responsible for aldosterone synthesis and is controlled both morphologically and biochemically by sodium, potassium, and angiotensin levels. The inner zonae fasciculata and reticularis produce cortisol and corticosterone. The zonae fasciculata and reticularis, and to a lesser extent the zona glomerulosa, are primarily regulated by ACTH released from the pituitary.
Secreted Steroids
There are five classes of steroid hormones which are produced by the adrenal cortex in varying amounts: the 21-carbon glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids, and progestins; the 19-carbon androgens; and the 18-carbon estrogens. Since progestin, androgen, and estrogen production by the adrenal cortex contributes only a very small percentage of the total amount of each of these steroids synthesized in the body, they will not be discussed further in this chapter. In contrast, the glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids are made almost exclusively in the adrenal cortex, representing its major biologic product. Glucocorticoids have a broad physiologic role, which includes regulation of glucose metabolism and gluconeogenesis, as well as modulation of the immune system. In humans, the primary glucocorticoids are cortisol and, to a much lesser extent, corticosterone. Mineralocorticoids function as crucial regulators of mineral and water metabolism. In humans, the major bioactive mineralocorticoids are aldosterone and deoxycorticosterone.
Biosynthetic Pathways
Corticosteroid biosynthesis has been well characterized and is presented in a simplified form in Fig. 54.1. Cholesterol, the precursor for the biosynthesis of all steroids, is converted to various steroid molecules in a series of reactions that are mediated by several cytochrome P-450 enzymes.10 While the adrenal cortex can synthesize cholesterol to some extent, 60 to 80% of the cholesterol used in steroid synthesis originates from sources outside the adrenal cortex.11 The primary source of cholesterol for steroid synthesis is the pool which circulates in plasma bound to low-density lipoproteins, for which the adrenal cortex has a large number of receptors. Once synthesized, corticosteroids are not stored within the adrenal cortex but are rapidly secreted. The adrenal cortex harbors only enough steroid to maintain normal serum corticosteroid levels for a few minutes once synthesis is halted. Therefore, the rate of corticosteroid synthesis is essentially equal to the rate of secretion from the adrenal gland.

Figure 54.1
Principal pathways for the biosynthesis of adrenocorticosteroids. With permission from Haynes RC Jr, Murad F. Adrenocorticotropic hormone; adrenocortical steroids and their synthetic analogs; inhibitors of adrenocortical steroid biosynthesis. In: The (more...)
Control of Corticosteroid Secretion
Glucocorticoids
The rate of corticosteroid synthesis is controlled by ACTH, a peptide hormone synthesized and secreted from the corticotrophs (basophilic cells) of the anterior pituitary gland. ACTH affects all three zones of the adrenal cortex to some extent. Elevated levels of ACTH can lead to hyperplasia and hypertrophy of the adrenal cortex and a continuous high output of cortisol and corticosterone. A lack of ACTH results in atrophy of the cortex, with decreased secretion of cortisol and corticosterone. In contrast, aldosterone levels are not significantly affected by changes in ACTH because the zona glomerulosa is the region of the adrenal cortex which is least affected by ACTH. The mechanism of ACTH action is that of a classic peptide hormone (i.e., ACTH binds to specific receptors that are located in the adrenal cell membrane. Activation of the G-protein–coupled membrane receptor by ACTH binding results in increased levels of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and other second messengers12). ACTH acts on the adrenal cortex to increase steroid synthesis and secretion by stimulating the side-chain cleavage reaction that converts cholesterol to pregnenolone. ACTH increases the rate of this reaction by increasing the availability of cholesterol as a substrate for the enzymatic reaction (the result of an increased number of low-density lipoprotein [LDL] receptors13), as well as by increasing the synthesis of the cytochrome P-450 side-chain cleavage enzyme.14,15
ACTH secretion from the anterior pituitary gland is positively regulated by the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), which is secreted from the median eminence of the hypothalamus.16 Neural signals converge on the hypothalamus to cause the release of CRF, which travels via a vascular connection to the pituitary gland, where it stimulates the synthesis and release of the polyprotein precursor to ACTH, pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC). POMC is cleaved into several bioactive peptides that are secreted from the corticotrophs along with ACTH, including β-lipotropin and β-endorphin. Glucocorticoids exert negative feedback control on ACTH levels, both at the level of the pituitary gland and of the hypothalamus:17 they suppress POMC synthesis and decrease ACTH stores in secretory granules. High levels of glucocorticoids also cause corticotropic cell degeneration. Following adrenalectomy or in patients with Addison’s disease, when glucocorticoid levels are low, the concentration of ACTH in the plasma remains high. ACTH levels can, however, still be stimulated by CRF, indicating that ACTH remains under nervous control in the absence of negative feedback. In addition to the described endocrine feedback loops, it is now understood that there is also significant immune regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis via the actions of cytokines such as interleukins 1β and 6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interferons α and γ. These cytokines appear to regulate the expression of POMC, the secretion of CRF and its function on the corticotrophs, and the function of the adrenal cortex.18
Frequent measurement of plasma cortisol levels has revealed that the level of this steroid fluctuates irregular.19 These spontaneous changes are the result of rapid increases in the cortisol secretion rate that occur 7 to 13 times a day. These increases, although irregular, occur in a reproducible pattern for any given person. The slope of the rise in secretion rate is constant for any individual and averages around 50 mg/min. The decline of these peaks of cortisol levels occurs in a semilog fashion, indicating that this spontaneous secretion occurs in an “on/off” manner. Thus, the total amount of cortisol secreted throughout the day reflects the number of episodes of high secretion that occur rather than the changes in the secretion rate. This spontaneous rhythm of cortisol secretion results in minimal plasma cortisol levels 1 to 2 hours after the onset of sleep, with a rise occurring during sleep to maximum levels at the time of awakening and a fall in plasma levels during the day. This secretion pattern is due to an intrinsic function of the hypothalamus and does not appear to be subject to glucocorticoid-induced negative feedback. Although the specific mechanism responsible for this intrinsic rhythm is unknown, the major factors that affect the pattern appear to be timing of sleep, feeding, and exposure to light.
Stress also stimulates ACTH production and subsequent adrenal steroid secretion.20 These stimuli can be psychological (e.g., anticipation, fear, depression) or physical (e.g., exercise, hypoglycemia, surgery, trauma, burns, cold, hypotension). If the sensory connections that mediate these stimuli are blocked, no adrenal stimulation occurs.21 There is a quantitative relationship between the intensity of the stressful stimulus and the adrenal response;22 however, pretreatment with glucocorticoids can inhibit this effect through negative feedback mechanisms.23
Mineralocorticoids
The major physiologic regulator of aldosterone levels is the renin-angiotensin system.24 Renin, a protein made in the kidney, converts angiotensinogen to angiotensin I (ACI), a tetradecapeptide that is subsequently converted by angiotensinconverting enzymes (ACE) to the active peptide angiotensin II (AT II) and its bioactive degradation products AT III and AT IV. AT II (and probably AT III and AT IV as well) stimulates aldosterone biosynthesis through interaction with a family of G–protein coupled cell surface receptors in the zona glomerulosa. This effect is influenced by a variety of factors including plasma potassium levels, changes in intracellular calcium, the release of nitricoxide (NO), and atrial natriuretic peptide.25 Another effect of angiotensin is to increase peripheral arterial resistance, which in turn increases blood pressure.26 Changes in blood pressure then feed back on renin secretion. The regulatory mechanism for renin secretion is just beginning to be worked out and appears to involve kidney baroreceptors, sympathetic innervation, NO production, and serum calcium, sodium, and potassium balance.27
Serum sodium and potassium levels provide a second mechanism of control for mineralocorticoid synthesis. Increases in serum potassium result in increased aldosterone secretion due to the direct effects of potassium on the adrenal gland, which stimulate some of the early steps in steroid biosynthesis. Low serum sodium can also increase aldosterone secretion, but this mechanism does not appear to be a major regulator of mineralocorticoid secretion, since serum sodium concentration changes little with changes in total blood volume.
Pharmacokinetics of Corticosteroids
Rate of Secretion
Cortisol, the major glucocorticoid in humans, is secreted at a rate of 15 to 20 mg/d in men and at an approximately 10% lower rate in women.28 The less abundant glucocorticoid corticosterone is secreted at a rate of 4 mg/d, although it can rise to as high as 40 mg/d with ACTH stimulation. The two main mineralocorticoids, aldosterone and deoxycorticosterone, are secreted at the rates of 50 to 200 and 16 to 40 mg/d, respectively.
Metabolism
The corticosteroids are metabolized through a variety of biochemical enzymatic transformations that diminish physiologic activity and result in increased water solubility to enhance their urinary excretion.29 The majority of serum cortisol is reduced to dihydrocortisol and then to tetrahydrocortisol, which is then conjugated to glucuronic acid. About 10% of cortisol is converted to the 17-ketosteroid, which is then conjugated to sulfate. Most of the circulating aldosterone is converted to the tetrahydroglucuronide derivative. About 70% of corticosteroid metabolism occurs in the liver, and certain diseases of the liver can allow increased levels of free hormone to occur due to the decrease in metabolism, as well as to the decrease in serum steroid-binding proteins that often occurs during liver disease.
Plasma Clearance
The plasma clearance of cortisol is rapid, with a half-life of 66 minutes at normal hormone levels.19 With large steroid loads, however, the half-life increases to 120 minutes. The volume of distribution (VD) changes in a similar fashion, with a VD of 10 L under normal conditions and a VD that can be greater than total body water with large steroid loads. Corticosterone turns over even more rapidly than cortisol, and the clearance rates of both steroids are unaffected by acute stress or adrenal insufficiency. The plasma half-life of aldosterone is less than 20 minutes.
Excretion
Cortisol excretion in urine is relatively low, 100 μg/day, primarily because 80 to 90% of filtered cortisol is reabsorbed, mostly from the distal tubule of the kidney.30 In contrast, conjugated metabolites are filtered and excreted with no reabsorption. Over 90% of secreted glucocorticoid is ultimately excreted in urine. Less than 10% of the secreted aldosterone appears in the urine in the free form. The majority is excreted as glucuronide derivatives.
Transport in Blood
Cortisol can be found in free form in circulation, but since it is a lipophilic molecule, it is predominantly found in the plasma bound either to corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), a glycoprotein with a molecular weight of 51,700 which is produced in the liver, or to albumin. CBG is normally found in the plasma at a relatively constant level of 40 mg/L (0.8μM ) and binds about 70% of plasma cortisol (14 μg/dL). However, the concentration of CBG in plasma is subject to dynamic regulation. For example, during pregnancy, plasma levels of CBG rise dramatically. In contrast, acute stresses such as burn injury or septic shock can lead to dramatic decreases in plasma CBG. Cortisol binds to CBG with high affinity (kd = 2.4 × 10-7 M; half-life of steroid binding = 5 days). CBG can bind other steroids, including progesterone, prednisolone, and aldosterone. These steroids compete for binding sites on CBG, and high levels of one steroid will displace the others. For example, therapeutic levels of prednisone displace 35% of CBG-bound cortisol. In contrast, many of the synthetic glucocorticoids, including dexamethasone, fail to bind CBG. Albumin, a protein with a molecular weight of 69,000, circulates in plasma at a concentration of 40 g/L (0.5–0.6 mM) has low affinity for cortisol (kd 5 10-5 M) and binds only 20% of plasma cortisol. Thus, at low serum cortisol levels, most of the cortisol is bound to CBG. However, the binding capacity of CBG is saturated at a cortisol concentration of 28 μg/dL, a level that is frequently exceeded in stressed patients. With elevations in plasma cortisol, there is an increased proportion of albumin-bound and free cortisol, whereas the amount of CBG-bound cortisol remains the same. The concentration of free cortisol is 1 μg/dL at a normal total plasma cortisol of 20 μg/dL, although this value can rise to as high as 15 to 50 μg/dL after ACTH stimulation. Free cortisol is considered to be the active form because protein-bound cortisol cannot easily pass through cell membranes. Because there is rapid equilibration between the bound and free fractions of cortisol, the bound fraction acts as a reservoir. Thus, increases in plasma CBG, such as occur during pregnancy, can greatly increase the amount of cortisol reserves which are available at a constant rate of synthesis, while short-term decreases in plasma CBG during acute stress can significantly increase the pool of free cortisol. The fact that total plasma cortisol falls below 5 μg/dL at night exemplifies how rapidly cortisol can leave the plasma. Aldosterone does not have a specific binding protein; however, it does bind weakly to albumin. A normal plasma aldosterone level is 0.006 μg/dL (0.17 nM). Other steroids with mineralocorticoid activity, such as corticosterone and 11-deoxycorticosterone, do bind CBG. CBG-bound corticosteroids are resistant to metabolism.
Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors
There are several inhibitors of steroid biosynthesis that are used clinically to treat corticosteroid hypersecretion or to eliminate the synthesis of a specific class of steroids.31 Metyrapone blocks the 11β hydroxylation of steroids.32 Synthesis, therefore, terminates after the formation of 11-deoxycortisol, the immediate precursor to cortisol. This compound does not negatively feed back on ACTH secretion; therefore, serum ACTH and 11-deoxycortisol levels remain high. Metyrapone also inhibits the synthesis of aldosterone, but no sodium balance problems accrue because the synthesis of 11-deoxycortisone, which has mineralocorticoid activity, remains intact. Aminoglutethimide inhibits the conversion of cholesterol to 20α-hydroxycholesterol and blocks the synthesis of both cortisol and aldosterone, as well as other classes of steroid hormones.33 Mitotane is an adrenocorticolytic drug, which is thought to exert its corticolytic function by accumulating in the cell membrane and damaging membrane ion channels/pumps. The membrane damage leads to activation of lipid peroxidation and subsequently to DNA and protein destruction in the adrenal cortex.34 Selective destruction of adrenocortical cells by mitotane causes a rapid decrease in plasma corticosteroid levels. Aromatase inhibitors have also come into use as steroid synthesis inhibitors, exhibiting increased potency and selectivity. These compounds, currently available as third-generation derivatives, including vorozole, letrozole, and anastrozole, lower estrogen levels effectively and with minimal side effects, while abrogating the need for corticosteroid replacement.35
Pharmaceutical Derivatives
The molecular structure of steroid hormones is a critical determinant of their physiologic activities. Organic chemists have studied the structure-activity relationships of these molecules and have synthesized a myriad cortisol analogues with varying potencies that effectively separate the glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid activities of the natural corticosteroids. This has made the synthetic glucocorticoids clinically useful, even though it has not been possible to separate glucocorticoid activity from the toxic side effects of these molecules. Table 54.1 lists some of the available natural and synthetic corticosteroids with their relative ratio of specificity and equivalent doses. All corticosteroids are absorbed readily from the gastrointestinal tract. Water-soluble esters are given intravenously (IV) to achieve absorption rapidly, while intramuscular injection provides more prolonged effects. Corticosteroids are also well absorbed from several sites of topical application, and large doses can lead to systemic absorption.
Table 54.1
Relative Potencies and Equivalent Dose of Corticosteroids.
Changes in steroid activity also result in changes in absorption, plasma protein binding, and clearance rates. There is wide variability in the free fraction of synthetic steroids from patient to patient at comparable total plasma concentrations. There is also variability in patient sensitivity to generation of Cushing-like symptoms. These differing sensitivities are reflected in different plasma corticosteroid concentrations, suggestive of pituitary resistance to corticosteroid feedback. Additionally, differences in the pharmacokinetics of glucocorticoids between men, women, and children should continue to be considered when designing therapeutic regimens.36,37
Physiologic and Pharmacologic Effects of Corticosteroids
The primary functions of the corticosteroids are to (1) regulate whole body homeostasis, and (2) maintain balance in the body’s host-defense system to protect against over-reaction to environmental changes and the invasion of foreign substances. The effects of corticosteroids on the human body are widespread and include profound alterations in carbohydrate, protein, and lipid metabolisms, as well as effects on electrolyte and water balance. Corticosteroids affect all the major systems of the body, including the cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, nervous, and immune systems, and play critical roles in fetal development, including the maturation of the fetal lung. Because so many systems are sensitive to corticosteroid levels, tight regulatory control is exerted on the system. The direct effects of corticosteroids are sometimes difficult to separate from their complex relationship with other hormones, in part due to the permissive action of low levels of corticosteroid on the effectiveness of other hormones, including catecholamines and glucagon. Nevertheless, the effects of corticosteroids can be classified into two general categories: the effects of glucocorticoids (intermediary metabolism, inflammation, immunity, wound healing, myocardial and muscle integrity) and the effects of mineralocorticoids (salt, water, and mineral metabolisms). Although the following section will discuss the separate effects of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids, it must be emphasized that the natural steroids possess both glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid activity to some extent. The ratio between the two activities ranges from all glucocorticoid and almost no mineralocorticoid activity (cortisol) to all mineralocorticoid and almost no glucocorticoid activity (aldosterone).
Intermediary Metabolism
Glucocorticoids stimulate the conversion of protein to carbohydrate through gluconeogenesis and promote the storage of carbohydrate as glycogen in the liver. The increase in urinary nitrogen after an increase in glucocorticoids is the result of amino acid mobilization from proteins and its subsequent breakdown as a source of carbon during gluconeogenesis. Adrenalectomized animals are able to function normally as long as food (i.e., free amino acids) is available. Upon starvation, however, these animals cannot mobilize amino acids from muscle or serum protein, indicating that cortisol plays a role in mobilizing amino acids from the proteins in plasma and muscle.38 Glucocorticoids stimulate the process of hepatic gluconeogenesis, resulting in elevated plasma glucose.39 In turn, the increase in available glucose promotes the deposition of liver glycogen.40 This increase in hepatic gluconeogenesis/glycogenesis is due to the direct effects of glucocorticoids on the expression of genes in the liver which encode enzymes required for the biosynthesis of glucose and glycogen. Prolonged doses of glucocorticoids lead to a diabetes-like state due to the increase in plasma glucose, whereas low glucocorticoid concentrations lead to hypoglycemia, decreased glycogen stores in muscle and liver, and hypersensitivity to insulin. Glucocorticoids also decrease facilitated uptake of glucose in peripheral tissues to provide more glucose for glycogen formation in the liver. This dampening of glucose uptake is particularly prevalent in leukocytes and may be a major contributing factor to the rapid elevation in blood glucose after steroid administration. The complex mechanisms for the peripheral effects of glucocorticoids are still unclear, but chronic administration can result in the atrophy of lymphatic tissue and muscle, osteoporosis, and thinning of the skin.
There are two established effects of glucocorticoids on lipid metabolism. One is the redistribution of body fat in hypercorticism; the other is facilitation of the effects of lipolytic agents. Large doses of glucocorticoids lead to formation of fat depots on the back of the neck, the supraclavicular area, and the face, with a concomitant loss of fat in the extremities.41 The mechanism for this effect is not understood, although these apparently paradoxical responses may result from differences in the number of glucocorticoid receptors in these different types of fat cells.42 By this hypothesis, cells with fewer receptors would be spared the effects of glucocorticoids on glucose transport, and, therefore, glucose and triglyceride accumulation would occur in response to the rise in insulin levels. In contrast, fat cells containing higher levels of receptor (perhaps in the periphery) would respond to the high glucocorticoid level by decreasing glucose uptake and would not accumulate triglycerides. Alternatively, cells in the extremities may be less sensitive to insulin.43 The mobilization of fat from peripheral depots by epinephrine and other lipolytics is severely blunted in the absence of glucocorticoids.44 Cortisol facilitates the response of adipocytes to the rise in cyclic AMP (cAMP) induced by these agents rather than creating a larger increase in the amount of cAMP.
Electrolyte and Water Balance
The major effect of mineralocorticoids is the regulation of electrolyte excretion in the kidney.45 Aldosterone treatment results in increased sodium reabsorption from tubular fluid and an increase in the excretion of potassium and hydrogen. Similar effects on cation transport in most other tissues account for all the systemic activity of mineralocorticoids. The primary features of excess mineralocorticoids are positive sodium balance, increased extracellular fluid volume, normal or slightly high plasma sodium, hypokalemia, and alkalosis. Under conditions of hypocorticism there is renal loss of sodium, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, and a decrease in extracellular fluid volume and cellular hydration. The 1% decrease in sodium reabsorption that occurs in hypocorticism is enough to cause profound cardiovascular changes, resulting in circulatory collapse, renal failure, and, ultimately, death. Aldosterone is known to modulate sodium levels by activating mineralocorticoid receptors in the distal tubules of the kidney, which results in increased permeability of the apical membrane of the cells lining the cortical collecting tube. However, there is also evidence of a rapid (within minutes) upregulation of sodium-hydrogen exchange by aldosterone which is independent of traditional mineralocorticoid receptors.46 Aldosterone has also been shown to increase the activity of the sodium/potassium-ATPase in the serosal membrane.47 These changes allow more sodium to be reabsorbed and generate a higher negative potential in the lumen, which is the driving force for increased potassium and hydrogen excretion. Mineralocorticoids also increase calcium and magnesium excretion, probably due to volume expansion. Prolonged aldosterone treatment results in sodium “escaping,” a cessation of sodium changes, while potassium and hydrogen loss continues to occur. The mechanism for this effect is unknown but may involve mineralocorticoid receptor downregulation and subsequent cessation of hormonal responsiveness.
Glucocorticoid effects on the kidney differ from mineralocorticoid effects. Glucocorticoids increase water diuresis, glomerular filtration rate, and renal plasma flow. Although increases in sodium retention and potassium excretion occur with cortisol, there seems to be no increase in hydrogen excretion. The major renal complications of glucocorticoid therapy are nephrocalcinosis, nephrolithiasis, and increased stone formation from the increase in urinary concentrations of calcium and uric acid.48
Electrolyte changes also occur in tissues other than the kidney in response to mineralocorticoid treatment. These affected tissues include gastrointestinal mucosa,49 salivary and sweat glands,50 and exocrine pancreas. In these tissues, a longer onset period is required to detect significant responses to aldosterone, and no sodium “escape” occurs after prolonged hormone administration. Aldosterone apparently does not cause changes in intestinal electrolyte absorption,51 but glucocorticoids increase sodium and water absorption and potassium secretion. Both glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors are present in the mucosa, but dexamethasone can bind to both receptor types whereas aldosterone can only bind to its own receptor. Cortisol also increases gastric acid secretion and bloodflow to the gastric mucosa, while decreasing the rate of gastric cell proliferation. High doses of glucocorticoids may cause peptic ulceration or aggravate pre-existing ulcers.52
Endocrine System
In addition to the effects on ACTH secretion previously described, corticosteroids influence the action of several other hormones. Cortisol increases growth hormone secretion in patients with acromegaly.53 In contrast, the spontaneous secretion of growth hormone is inhibited in hypercorticism.54 Growth failure is observed with prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in children. This response is apparently due to decreased maturation of the epiphyseal plates and a decrease in long bone growth.55 Corticosteroids depress the secretion of thyroid-stimulating hormone in patients with myxedema56 and reduce the physiologic effectiveness of thyroxine.57 High doses of steroid decrease leutinizing hormone release in response to leutinizing hormone-releasing hormone.58 Corticosteroids also have been shown to potentiate the β-adrenergic effects of catecholamines and stimulate the synthesis of epinephrine from norepinephrine.59 Other systemic effects of high doses of glucocorticoids include adrenocortical insufficiency upon glucocorticoid removal, steroid-induced diabetes, hyperlipidemia, high glucagon levels, and hypocalcemia.60
Cardiovascular System
The major effects of corticosteroids on the cardiovascular system are due to their influence on plasma volume, electrolyte retention, epinephrine synthesis, and angiotensin levels, which together result in the maintenance of normal blood pressure and cardiac output. However, the hypotension that occurs from corticosteroid deficiency cannot be totally explained by these factors. Corticosteroids have effects on myocardial responsiveness, arteriolar tone, and capillary permeability. Hypocorticism leads to increased capillary permeability, inadequate vasomotor response, and decrease in cardiac output and cardiac size. Hypercorticism leads to chronic arterial hypertension.61 The mechanisms responsible for this effect are not yet clear, but the effect is specific to mineralocorticoids and may be due to prolonged, excessive sodium retention. Recent studies indicate that aldosterone affects ion transport in the vascular smooth muscle and the central nervous system,62 possibly altering sympathetic output by influencing the periventricular area of the hypothalamus, where information about cardiovascular status, and electorolyte and fluid balance are integrated. Hypertension can also be induced by glucocorticoids. The mechanism for this response is unknown, but glucocorticoids influence many factors, including increased filtration fraction and glomerular hypertension, increased angiotensinogen synthesis, decreased prostaglandin synthesis that leads to decreased vasodilation, increased responsiveness to vasopressors, decreased expression of calcium-activated potassium channels which modulate the tone of vascular smooth muscle, and increased synthesis of atrial natriuretic peptide. There is evidence that glucocorticoids potentiate atherosclerosis and thromboembolic complications.63
Musculoskeletal System
Normal corticosteroid levels are required for muscle maintenance; however, either excess glucocorticoid or mineralocorticoid can lead to muscle abnormalities.64 High aldosterone levels cause muscle weakness due to hypokalemia. High glucocorticoid levels cause muscle wasting due to catabolic effects on protein metabolism as described previously. Corticosteroid insufficiency results in the decreased work capacity of striated muscle, weakness, and fatigue. This response reflects an inadequacy of the circulatory system rather than electrolyte and carbohydrate imbalances.
The most debilitating effect of glucocorticoids on bone is induction of osteoporosis.65 This response results from a decrease in osteoblast activity, as well as from a decrease in gastrointestinal absorption of calcium. The decrease in serum calcium causes increased secretion of parathyroid hormone, which in turn stimulates osteoclast activity. Therefore, glucocorticoids act to decrease bone formation, as well as to increase bone resorption. Other effects of high doses of glucocorticoids on the musculoskeletal system include aseptic or avascular necrosis of bone and spontaneous tendon rupture, presumably through an effect on collagen metabolism.63,66,67
Central Nervous System
Corticosteroids affect the nervous system indirectly in a number of ways by maintaining normal plasma glucose levels, adequate circulation, and normal electrolyte levels. The direct effects of corticosteroids on the central nervous system are not well defined; however, changes in corticosteroid levels do influence mood, behavior, electroencephalograph patterns, and brain excitability. Chronic glucocorticoid treatment has been shown to cause cell death in the hippocampal neurons in rats, and recent data suggest that elevated levels of glucocorticoids in the aging hippocampus play a role in altered cognition, dementia, and depression in aging humans.68 Patients with Addison’s disease are subject to apathy, depression, irritability, and psychosis.69 These symptoms are alleviated by glucocorticoid treatment but not by mineralocorticoids. Individuals with Cushing’s disease are known to develop neuroses and psychoses that are reversible with the removal of excess hormone.70 Increases in brain excitability in hypercorticism and after mineralocorticoid treatment are due to electrolyte imbalances. However, the increase in brain excitability induced by cortisol is not due to changes in sodium concentration. Chronic glucocorticoid treatment can also result in pseudotumor cerebri, primarily in children.71
Hematologic Effects
Corticosteroids increase hemoglobin and red cell content of blood as demonstrated by the occurrence of polycythemia in Cushing’s disease and mild normochromic anemia in Addison’s disease. These steroids may retard erythrophagocytosis. Corticosteroids also affect circulating white cells. Glucocorticoid treatment results in increased polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the blood as a result of increased rate of entrance from the marrow and a decreased rate of removal from the vascular compartment. In contrast, the lymphocytes, eosinophils, monocytes, and basophils decrease in number after administration of glucocorticoids. A single dose of cortisol results in a 70% decrease in lymphocytes and a 90% decrease in monocytes, which occurs 4 to 6 hours after treatment and persists for about 24 hours. Cell numbers then rise 24 to 72 hours after treatment.72 The decrease in lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils was originally thought to be due to redistribution of these cells, although recent data suggest that certain lymphocyte subpopulations undergo apoptosis in response to glucocorticoids.73 The T lymphocytes appear to be more sensitive to the apoptotic effects of glucocorticoids than are B lymphocytes, and T-cell subpopulations differ in their glucocorticoid sensitivity. The decrease in basophils occurs by an unknown mechanism.
Anti-inflammatory Effects
Glucocorticoids prevent or suppress the full inflammatory reaction to infectious, physical, or immunologic agents. The local heat, redness, swelling, and tenderness typically associated with an inflammatory response do not develop. Glucocorticoids inhibit the early events in the process, including edema, cellular exudation, fibrin deposition, capillary dilatation, migration of leukocytes into the area, and phagocytic activity. Later events are also inhibited, including capillary and fibroblast proliferation, deposition of collagen, and cicatrization. The mechanism is not clearly understood, but it is of great therapeutic relevance.
A major effect of glucocorticoids on the inflammatory process is inhibition of the recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes.74 The tendency of neutrophils to adhere to capillary endothelial cells, which is mediated by prostaglandins, is also decreased. This is due to inhibition of the normal increase in expression of endothelial adhesion molecules (i.e., ELAM-1, ICAM-1).75 Glucocorticoids decrease the synthesis and release of prostaglandins by downregulating the expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 ( Cox-2). Cox-2 catalyzes the rate limiting step in the prostaglandin synthesis pathway. Glucocorticoids also inhibit synthesis of plasminogen activator and migration inhibitory factor,76,77 stabilize lysosomes (thereby decreasing the release of hydrolytic enzymes and histamine78), and decrease the binding of chemokines that attract white blood cells.79 Glucocorticoids slow down wound healing by blocking the normal inflammatory reaction of breaking down and disorganizing collagen.
Immune System
It has long been known that hypocorticism results in hypertrophy of lymphoid tissue (i.e., thymus, spleen, lymph nodes) and that hypercorticism leads to dimunition or total loss of these tissues. Glucocorticoids induce rapid apoptosis in lymphatic tissue in rats and mice, but these effects seem to occur only at pharmacologic doses in man. The effects that are seen in humans, therefore, may be due to changes in the rate of formation or destruction of lymphoid cells, which become evident over a longer period of time. More acute effects of glucocorticoid on lymphoid cells in man are probably due to sequestration of the cells rather than to cell lysis, although there is evidence that certain types of activated T lymphocytes are susceptible to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis.73 In contrast to normal human lymphocytes, acute lymphocytic leukemias and other malignancies respond to glucocorticoid treatment by apoptosis as is seen in rodents. Glucocorticoids decrease the secretion of interleukin-1, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and other mediators of immune response. They also inhibit lymphocyte participation in delayed hypersensitivity reactions and interfere with the rejection of immunologically incompatible graft tissue.80 This is probably due to decreases in leukocyte recruitment. High doses of glucocorticoids inhibit immunoglobulin synthesis, kill B cells,81 and decrease production of certain components of the complement system.82
Other Effects
Other effects of prolonged glucocorticoid therapy include ophthalmologic (posterior subcapsular cataracts,83 increased intraocular pressure84) and dermatologic (redistribution of subcutaneous fat, hirsutism, alopecia, impaired wound healing, purpura, purple striae, and acneiform eruptions85) problems. Long-term glucocorticoid treatment, with the concomitant immunosuppression, also leaves patients susceptible to diseases such as Kaposi’s sarcoma86 and fungal infections.87
Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Neoplasms
Once corticosteroids became available, many studies were designed to assess effect of these compounds on experimental neoplasms. It was first discovered that cortisone caused tumor regression in a transplantable mouse lymphosarcoma,88 and this finding was soon extended to a wide variety of mouse lymphatic tumors. The effects of corticosteroids were also evaluated on many nonendocrine and nonlymphoid transplantable rodent tumors. Pharmacologic doses of steroid inhibited growth of various tumor systems.89 Tissue culture studies subsequently confirmed that lymphoid cells were the most sensitive to glucocorticoids and responded to treatment with decreases in the synthesis of DNA, RNA, and protein.90 Studies of proliferating human leukemic lymphoblasts supported the hypothesis that glucocorticoids have preferential lymphocytolytic effects, and the mechanism of action was initially thought to be due to a decrease in glucose transport and/or phosphorylation, which would lead to decreased energy utilization from the lack of glucose.91 Subsequently, however, it was discovered that glucocorticoids induce apoptosis, or programmed cell death, in certain lymphoid cell populations.92 Despite an incomplete understanding of the mechanism of action of glucocorticoids, it is clear that these steroids have great clinical value in the treatment of neoplasms of lymphoid origin and, to a much lesser extent, other endocrine-responsive cancers. Glucocorticoids are also efficacious in the treatment of several frequently occurring side effects of malignancies, as well as for general palliative therapy.
Neoplasms Treated with Corticosteroids
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Early studies of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with prednisone alone showed that 50% of the affected children responded with prompt clinical improvement and remission.93 However, the duration of remission was short (1 year), and relapse was inevitable, often coinciding with the appearance of steroid resistance. For these reasons, multiple drug therapy was initiated, which involves combining prednisone with other cytotoxic agents. With the advent of regimens that contain vincristine and prednisone or prednisolone, more than 90% of children94,95 and 60 to 80% of adults96–99 achieve remission. The inclusion of other agents, such as daunorubicin, Lasparaginase, cytosine arabinoside, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, appears to prolong remission, but whether or not it increases the rate of remission is unclear. More recent studies suggest that dexamethasone may be a more potent antileukemic agent than prednisone at conventional equivalent doses. Recent studies also suggest that a higher rate of response can be attained by immunophenotyping to predict corticosteroid sensitivity and lineage in childhood ALL.100
Once remission is achieved, a 2- to 3-year program of maintenance therapy follows, which involves regular intensive chemotherapy sessions that include glucocorticoids.95,97,101 Prophylactic treatment to prevent relapse in the central nervous system is often administered, consisting of cranial radiotherapy and intrathecal treatment with prednisone, methotrexate, and cytosine arabinoside.102,103 With this approach, more than 50% of children appear to be cured (no relapse within 5 years). The success rate is considerably lower in adults; only 15 to 30% of adults appear to be cured .
In refractory cases, or in cases of relapse, which occurs in approximately 20% of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, re-induction involves more aggressive combination chemotherapy, again including a glucocorticoid.104 Treatment with high doses of methylprednisolone (1 g/m2 for 5–8 days) is also used and may be more effective than conventional-dose prednisolone, with little toxicity.105,106 However, overall survival rates after relapse are fairly low, averaging 35 to 65% in children 102,103 and less in adults.
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Glucocorticoids appear to have little, if any, value in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Use of glucocorticoids as a single agent results in 10% complete remission.107 Glucocorticoids have been included in some combination chemotherapies, with accompanying complete remission rates of 64 to 82%.104,108,109 However, the importance of glucocorticoids in combinations such as these requires further study.
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Typical B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the early stage of progression responds well to combination chemotherapy including an alkylating agent (such as chlorambucil) plus or minus prednisolone.110,111 Advanced stages of the disease sometimes require the addition of an anthracycline and a vinca alkaloid for successful therapy. One commonly used combination is cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP).112 Fludarabine appears to be effective in both untreated and refractory cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.113–115 Corticosteroids are particularly useful if the neoplasm is associated with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia with hemorrhagic complications.116 Glucocorticoids alleviate the lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly that are often associated with this condition.
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase presents no indication for corticosteroids. Blast transformation is characterized by increased splenomegaly, bone pain, and deposits of leukemia outside the lymphohematopoietic system. Approximately 20 to 30% of cases show blast cells that resemble those of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The remainder of cases are myeloblastic, although a proportion have phenotypic features of both types.
Transformed lymphoblastic cells generally respond to the same treatments that are used in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Some patients enter complete remission but most return to the chronic phase. This chronic phase is brief; blastic transformation reappears and becomes increasingly difficult to treat due to the development of resistant cell types.
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Hodgkin’s lymphoma is a solid tumor found to be curable by chemotherapy. Corticosteroids alone were found to achieve worthwhile objective results in 66% of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients resistant to alkylating agent.117 Combination chemotherapy, with mustorgen, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP), was the first treatment to effectively cause complete remission, and probably cures, in a majority of patients.118 Since then other regimens, most of which contain a glucocorticoid component, have been found to be as effective as MOPP. One commonly used combination that does not contain a glucocorticoid, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD), is at least as effective as MOPP and has a lower incidence of side effects.119
Recent studies have shown that treatment of early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma with radiotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy.120,121 A new treatment regimen, NOVP (mitoxantrone, vinblastine, vincristine, prednisone), in combination with radiotherapy, shows promise as an extremely effective yet minimally toxic treatment for early (stage I and II) Hodgkin’s disease, with all patients in a preliminary study achieving complete remission and 5-year overall survival rates of 95%.122 Advanced-stage disease treated with MOPP, ABVD, or other similar combinations exhibits a complete response rate of 55 to 75%.123–125 Aggressive salvage therapies for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s disease that contain a glucocorticoid have a complete response rate around 30 to 50%.126–128
Non–Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Corticosteroids used as single agent therapy produce temporary responses in patients with non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma; they are, therefore, included in virtually every complex regimen used for the treatment of non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma.129 These regimens differ according to lymphoma histologic subtype and stage. Patients with disseminated lymphomas treated with recent generations of drug combinations have 3- to 4-year survival rates of 30 to 70%.130 Recent studies indicate that an intensified CHOP regimen (1.8 times the standard dosage) is a feasible and effective treatment for patients with histologically aggressive non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma.131 One study indicates that the use of interferon-α-2b in combination with a typical glucocorticoid-containing drug regimen produces good results (85% overall response rate and 86% 3-year survival rate).132 If the tumor is located within the central nervous system, dexamethasone is preferred instead of prednisone to decrease tumor swelling.129
Multiple Myeloma
The standard therapy for multiple myeloma is melphalan and prednisone, which results in a 50% response rate.133,134 Complete remission is rare, however, and the median survival is only 24 to 30 months. Combination chemotherapies have also been used. These treatments have a higher complete response rate, but the median survival time is not significantly different from treatment with melphalan and prednisone. A combination of vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (VAD) appears to be effective, especially in refractory cases.135,136 A recent study indicates that treatment of multiple myeloma with intermittent dexamethasone administration leads to an overall response rate of 43%.137 Although this is about 15% less than the results of VAD therapy, there is a much lower incidence of serious complications, suggesting that dexamethasone alone may be a simple, effective, and safe therapy for multiple myeloma. Very high doses of glucocorticoids alone may be temporarily useful, albeit toxic, in cases of progressive or resistant disease, or if bone marrow reserve is limited. These doses can be as high as 1 g/m2/d for prednisone and 40 mg/m2/d for dexamethasone. High-dose melphalan plus methylprednisolone with autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation after conventional chemotherapy has resulted in a 75% complete remission rate and an estimated 54-month survival rate of 63%.138 Interferon-α has been used as a single agent and in combination with other treatments with some apparent success.134,139 The use of interferon-α along with a glucocorticoid for maintenance therapy, appears to prolong remission duration in some studies.140
Breast Cancer
Glucocorticoids are never used as the sole treatment for breast cancer, primarily because of the low response rate (< 25%), the deleterious side effects of the high doses needed, and the availability of more appropriate single-agent hormonal therapies for estrogen receptor–positive tumors. However, combination chemotherapy regimens which include glucocorticoids are employed in circumstances of disease progression and in the initial treatment of estrogen receptor– negative tumors.141 Although palliation of symptoms occurs in a majority of patients, only a small percentage benefit by prolonged survival.
The role of prednisone in the effectiveness of the cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone (CMFP) regimen is unclear. Some trials comparing CMF and CMFP found that the response to CMFP in premenopausal, node-positive women was not different from the response to CMF.142,143 Another comparison trial of CMF versus CMFP found that the inclusion of prednisone resulted in a longer time to treatment failure and a longer survival time.144 However, this may be due to the higher average dose of CMF in the CMFP patients. A trial of radiation treatment plus or minus prednisone found that radiation and prednisone together had a significant increase over radiation alone in disease-free and overall survival in premenopausal women over 45.133 A trial of high-dose chemotherapy involving an 11-drug combination including prednisone resulted in a very high response rate (overall response, 92%; complete response, 73%), but median survival time was not markedly increased from other studies.145 An intensive eight-drug combination with autologous bone marrow transplantation and loco-regional radiotherapy tested on patients with at least five involved lymph nodes resulted in a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 84%.146 The efficacy of the glucocorticoids in such regimens may be due, at least in part, to the improved tolerance of cytotoxic drugs. As a milder treatment for metastatic breast cancer patients who do not consent to aggressive cytotoxic chemotherapy, the combination of mitoxantrone, leukovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone induced tumor regression in 67% of patients with a complete response in 25% in one study.147
Other Uses
Hydrocortisone replacement (approximately 40 mg/d) is indicated after either surgical adrenalectomy or medical adrenalectomy via steroid synthesis inhibitors is performed to eliminate circulating steroids in cases of breast cancer, prostate cancer, and ectopic ACTH excess.148,149 Hemangiomas in infants are often treated with injections of glucocorticoids.150 Thymomas are often treated with glucocorticoids either alone or in combination with cytotoxic drugs.151,152 Other tumors that have been treated with combination chemotherapy involving a glucocorticoid include medulloblastoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumors, and ependymomas.153,154
Symptomatic Uses of Corticosteroids
Palliative Care
Glucocorticoid treatment produces rapid symptomatic improvements in critically ill patients, including temporary relief of fever, sweats, lethargy, weakness, nausea, and other nonspecific effects of cancer. Glucocorticoids also cause mild euphoria, a general feeling of well being, and a stimulation of appetite.155,156 These effects are transient, and only short-term treatment is possible due to side effects of the high doses. Also, when glucocorticoids are withdrawn, adrenocortical insufficiency and patient discomfort can occur. For these reasons, corticosteroid treatment is normally reserved for patients whose life expectancy is brief (a few weeks or less). While for most terminal patients opiods are the commonly employed option for pain management, corticosteroid therapy remains a viable option, especially in cancers of the central nervous system where edema is common. For palliative care, doses of 25 mg/d prednisolone are used initially with a decrease to 7.5 to 15 mg/d for maintenance of effects.
Hypercalcemia
Hypercalcemia is a common complication of many malignancies.157 It is caused in many cases by increased bone resorption and renal calcium reabsorption and is thought to be due to many factors that may be secreted by various tumors, especially those of lymphoid origin. Although glucocorticoids do not lower normal calcium levels, glucocorticoids in large doses have been used for treatment of hypercalcemia (100 mg/d prednisolone, 400 mg/d hydrocortisone). The mechanisms by which glucocorticoids reduce serum calcium are thought to be cytolytic action on lymphoid cells, decrease in lymphokine secretion, and inhibition of vitamin D action on calcium metabolism. Glucocorticoids are most effective on hypercalcemia that is secondary to high vitamin D levels. They are less effective in patients with solid tumors. The results in treatment of patients with multiple myeloma have been inconsistent. Glucocorticoids are, therefore, a poor choice, except in cases of vitamin D–mediated hypercalcemia.
Central Nervous System Tumors
Neurologic symptoms from primary and metastatic brain and spinal cord tumors are partially due to peritumoral edema.158 Glucocorticoids can ameliorate these symptoms in about 70 to 80% of cases after several days of treatment.159,160 There is evidence that glucocorticoids cause both a decrease in edema production and an increase in edema reabsorption. Dexamethasone is the recommended steroid for this treatment because it contains essentially no mineralocorticoid activity and is highly potent. A dose of 16 mg/d is used with an increase to 100 mg/d if no response occurs. This dose is continued until the maximum response is obtained. Doses are then decreased gradually and are maintained at the smallest effective dose. In a cautionary note, recent findings suggest that currently used doses are greatly in excess of the therapeutic level since 2 to 4 mg/d of dexamethasone was found to be sufficient for controlling edema during radiotherapy for brain metastases.161,162 Glucocorticoid effects on the brain and spinal cord are short lived and only increase survival time slightly unless other measures, such as radiotherapy and surgery, are taken. Glucocorticoids are often administered during these therapies to alleviate the edema that is normally induced by these treatments. It has been observed that glucocorticoids can decrease the amount of a cytotoxic drug, such as methotrexate, that gets to a tumor, possibly by decreasing capillary permeability. For this reason, a recent pilot study eliminated dexamethasone from the standard high-dose methotrexate protocol for children with brain tumors. The results indicated that dexamethasone could be eliminated from such treatment protocols without increased toxicity and with no occurrence of serious brain edema. The occurence of liver toxicity was also reduced when dexamthasone was excluded from the regimen.163
Antiemetic Action
Glucocorticoids have been shown to decrease the severity of chemotherapy-induced emesis.164 Both dexamethasone (8–20 mg) and methylprednisolone (125–250 mg) have been used successfully, with vomiting episodes reduced by as much as 74%.
Glucocorticoids are most effective when used at low doses to enhance the antiemetic efficacy of other drugs. Recent findings suggest that the combination of glucocorticoids with serotonin receptor antagonists (e.g., ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron) is extremely effective.165–167 The mechanism by which antiemesis occurs is unknown, but it may be associated with decreases in prostaglandin synthesis. Alternatively, glucocorticoids may act directly on the chemoreceptor trigger zone by modifying capillary permeability or stabilizing lysosomal membranes.
Dyspnea Caused by Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis
The dyspnea caused by lymphangitic carcinomatosis may be a result of tumor edema and is effectively relieved in most cases by glucocorticoid treatment.168 If the primary tumor is chemosensitive, then cytotoxic agents are also given. Prednisone is initially given at a dose of 60 to 100 mg/d and is then reduced rapidly to the minimum level that maintains the response. The benefits of this treatment may be short lived, and high doses may be indicated with the attendant danger of long-term complications.
Other Uses of Glucocorticoids
Acute upper airway obstruction can result from direct tumor growth or by compression from thyroid, lung, and esophageal cancers. This obstruction can be reduced by glucocorticoid treatment either alone or in combination with radiotherapy.169,170 Other cancer-related obstructions and mass effects can be partially and temporarily controlled by glucocorticoids. These include superior vena cava syndrome; lymphedema; liver metastases; masses in the pelvis, mediastinum, or retroperitoneum; and blockages of the large bowel or ureter.171 Therapeutic effects are due to reduction in peritumoral inflammation and edema. The pain that can accompany bone metastases or metastatic arthralgia from a variety of solid tumors often responds to glucocorticoid treatment.172 Several chemotherapeutic agents (mitomycin, bleomycin, busulfan, carmustine), as well as radiotherapy, are associated with pulmonary toxicity. This lung injury can be decreased, at least partially, by preventive glucocorticoid administration during chemotherapy. This treatment is most effective during mitomycin therapy. Dexamethasone (10–12 mg at each treatment) during mitomycin chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer was found to effectively prevent lung injury.173 A decrease in the antineoplastic effect of mitomycin was observed, suggesting that further study on this type of treatment is necessary. Loss of vision associated with pseudotumor cerebri can be treated with glucocorticoids.174
Mechanism of Glucocorticoid Action
The majority of the biologic effects of steroid hormones are mediated by intracellular receptor proteins that are specific for each steroid. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a cytoplasmic protein with an approximate molecular weight of 98,000, is present in all tissues that are targets of glucocorticoid action.175 Recent studies on mice with a disrupted GR gene recapitulate earlier observations that a functional glucocorticoid signaling pathway is essential for life, since mice lacking a functional GR die shortly after birth from respiratory failure.176 The concentration of glucocorticoid receptors in a given cell depends on many factors, including cell type, state of differentiation, phase of the cell cycle, endocrine status, and age. Glucocorticoid receptors are generally required for glucocorticoid-induced changes to occur, but hormonal sensitivity is not guaranteed by the presence of receptors. While in general, a good correlation between the concentration of glucocorticoid receptors in a cell and the cellular sensitivity to glucocorticoids exists, other factors may modulate glucocorticoid sensitivity. Such factors include the presence of nonfunctional or modified receptors and other cellular factors that modify receptor function.
In the current model for glucocorticoid action (Fig. 54.2), free glucocorticoids diffuse passively into the cell. The steroid then binds noncovalently and with high affinity to the cytoplasmic glucocorticoid receptor, which is held in a ligand-binding competent conformation by its association with regulatory proteins, including heat shock protein-90. Upon ligand binding, the glucocorticoid receptor becomes activated. The activation process includes a conformational change in the receptor, increased phosphorylation of the receptor protein, dissociation of the associated regulatory proteins, and the unmasking of the receptor DNA–binding domain. The activated steroid-receptor complex then translocates to the nucleus, where it binds as a homodimer to specific DNA sequences called glucocorticoid-responsive elements (GREs). After binding to a GRE, the steroid-receptor complex alters the transcription rate of specific genes which are associated with GREs. A classical glucocorticoid-responsive gene is depicted in Fig. 54.3. The GRE, shown with the consensus DNA sequence, is located in the 5’-regulatory region of the gene. A glucocorticoid receptor dimer bound to this GRE can interact with transcriptional cofactors, as well as with DNA-binding transcription factors that bind to other regulatory elements located in the 5’ region, such as the TATA and CAAT boxes. By this mechanism, glucocorticoids acting via the glucocorticoid receptor can increase the transcription rate of a positive GRE-containing gene, or decrease the transcription rate of a negative GRE-containing gene. These alterations in the transcription rate lead to changes in the amount of messenger RNA and ultimately the level of protein that is synthesized from these genes, and thus alter cellular functions. Glucocorticoid receptors have also been shown in a variety of experimental systems and cultured cells to negatively regulate the transcription of genes indirectly by interfering with the activity of other transcriptional activators, such as AP-1 and NF- κB. These repressive actions are the result of protein-protein, rather than protein-DNA, interactions. GR physically interacts with AP-1 heterodimers of fos and jun, thereby inhibiting the binding of this transcription factor to AP-1 responsive elements in the DNA. Via this mechanism, GR can inhibit the transcription of genes which do not contain a GRE, but are activated by AP-1. GR also negatively interacts with the transcription factor NF-κB, but the mechanism(s) by which this interaction represses the transcription of NF-κB responsive genes seems to differ from that described for GR and AP-1. The p65 subunit of the NF-κB heterodimer binds to GR, but the interaction does not appear to block p65 binding to DNA. Rather, the negative effect of GR/NF-κB binding appears to involve altered interactions with transcriptional cofactors which bind to both NF-κB and GR. A second mechanism by which GR is known to indirectly block transcription of NF-κB–responsive genes is by increasing the expression of the inhibitory subunit of NF-κB, IκBα.177 The anti-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids are largely attributable to these repressive effects of GR on the ability of AP-1 and NF-κB to activate pro-inflammatory genes.

Figure 54.2
Mechanism of action for the glucocorticoid signaling pathway. GR = glucocorticoid receptor;. GRE = glucocorticoid responsive element; nGRE = negative GRE; HSP = heat shock protein; GTM = general transcriptional machinery; AP-1 = AP-1 responsive element; (more...)

Figure 54.3
Structural characteristics of a classical glucocorticoid regulated gene. GRE=glucocorticoid responsive element; N=unspecified nucleoside.
One important aspect of receptor regulation that is especially relevant to glucocorticoid therapy is glucocorticoid-induced downregulation (tachyphylaxis) of the glucocorticoid receptor. The ability of glucocorticoid to downregulate its own receptor is mediated by the receptor itself.177 The maximum effect is a 50 to 75% decrease in receptor protein, which is reflected by a decrease in receptor messenger RNA that occurs within 24 hours of treatment. Long-term administration of glucocorticoids is not only associated with the downregulation of the glucocorticoid receptor but also with decreased function of other genes that are glucocorticoid sensitive.178 This phenomenon implies that continuous glucocorticoid treatment can have widespread deleterious effects on cell function and may explain why alternate-day glucocorticoid therapy is associated with a lesser risk of unwanted side effects.179 These results indicate that it may be important, in terms of efficacy and safety, to administer therapeutic doses of glucocorticoids in a manner that simulates the natural diurnal rhythm of glucocorticoid secretion.
Anticorticosteroids
Steroid receptor antagonists have been synthesized that inhibit the action of receptor ligands. Most of these antagonists are modified steroids that are competitive inhibitors of the receptor. The antagonist forms a complex with the receptor and then interferes with one or more of the normal functions of a ligand-bound receptor by not translocating to the nucleus, not binding to the appropriate DNA sequences with high affinity, not associating with appropriate transcriptional cofactors, or not affecting transcription rates. The best characterized antiglucocorticoids are the steroid metabolite cortexolone (11-deoxycortisol) and the antiprogestin RU-486.180 The antiprogestin effects of mifepristone (RU-486) are used clinically for the induction of abortions. The antiglucocorticoid effects of RU-486 are under investigation as a treatment for hypercorticism and as an antineoplastic agent for meningioma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and hepatoma. Spironolactone is a commonly used antimineralocorticoid. Animal studies suggest that antimineralocorticoids may be useful in the treatment of a variety diseases involving blood pressure and body fluid regulation.181 Currently, spironolactone is under examination as therapy for left ventricular hypertrophy associated with hypertension and is used to manage cirrhotic ascites.182,183
Corticosteroid Resistance
Since it was discovered that glucocorticoids have a specific cytolytic effect on human leukemic and lymphomatous tissue, the medical significance of glucocorticoid receptors in these tissues has been studied. The fact that not all leukemia patients respond to glucocorticoid treatment, combined with the observation that some patients cease to respond during therapy, has prompted investigators to try to identify a relationship between glucocorticoid receptor concentration and clinical responsiveness. Various human and mouse lymphoid cell lines, including CEM-C7184 and S49.1,185 have been extensively studied to determine how these cells become resistant to glucocorticoids. In almost every case of resistance in mouse cells, the cause is a defective glucocorticoid receptor or a large decrease in receptor number.186 However, resistant human leukemia cell lines were not initially found to contain major defects in the glucocorticoid receptor, such as those described in mouse lymphoma cell lines. With the advent of molecular analysis of the glucocorticoid receptor gene, resistant variants of the human T–cell-derived CEM cell line, which is by far the most extensively studied human leukemia cell line, were found to contain mutations in the glucocorticoid receptor.187,188 These mutations are often subtle, in some cases involving a single nucleotide change. No consistent relationship has been found between glucocorticoid receptor number and sensitivity to lymphocytolysis (apoptosis). The correlation is strongest for acute lymphocytic leukemia and non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma,189 while other diseases, notably acute myeloid leukemia,109 show no correlation. For chronic lymphocytic leukemia, the results are inconsistent.190,191 The lack of a consistent relationship between receptor number and sensitivity to glucocorticoid therapy suggests that some factor(s) other than the presence of glucocorticoid receptors may mediate the susceptibility of lymphoid cells to glucocorticoid-induced lymphocytolysis.
One topic of current research that may provide a better understanding of the mechanisms of corticosteroid resistance and help clarify the relationship between glucocorticoid receptor number and steroid sensitivity is the variant human glucocorticoid receptor, hGRβ. hGRβ is identical to the classical human GR (hGRα) through the first 727 amino acids, but diverges at the carboxy terminus. This variant of GR, like hGRα, is widely expressed. However, unlike hGRα, hGRβ does not bind hormone, is localized to the cell nucleus independent of hormone status, and does not activate glucocorticoid responsive genes. In vitro studies suggest that hGRβ functions as a dominant negative repressor of hGRα-mediated transactivation. Cell-type specific expression patterns for hGRα and hGRβ may be a key modulator of glucocorticoid sensitivity: the ratio of hGRα:hGRβ may be a more important determinant of hormone responsiveness than the absolute number of glucocorticoid receptors.177
Glucocorticoid-induced Apoptosis
For many years, it has been known that glucocorticoids induce massive lymphocytolysis in rats and mice, resulting in significant reductions in the size of lymphoid tissues, such as the thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes. This widely studied phenomenon was characterized in rodent thymus, where immature thymocytes are available in high numbers and die rapidly after glucocorticoid treatment by a specific process of cell death known as apoptosis, or programmed cell death.192 Apoptosis is associated with many physiologic processes, including embryogenesis, morphogenesis, normal tissue turnover, and cell-mediated immunity, and is induced by many different signals in these various systems. Morphologic characteristics of apoptosis include cellular condensation and internucleosomal chromatin degradation, followed by fragmentation into apoptotic bodies that are phagocytosed by neighboring cells or circulating macrophages.
Glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis occurs primarily in lymphocytes and is mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor.193 However, not all lymphocytes are sensitive. Immature T cells and some B cells are very sensitive to apoptosis, whereas mature T cells are not. In rodents, responsive cell populations start to die within 8 hours of glucocorticoid treatment in vivo. Nearly all immature thymocytes are dead within 48 hours of treatment.
In contrast, the sensitivity of human lymphocytes to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis appears to differ. Although these cells do respond to glucocorticoids, they do not die with the same kinetics as rodent lymphocytes. The marked lymphocytopenia observed after glucocorticoid treatment is mostly due to redistribution of lymphocytes into other tissues and is returned to normal within 24 hours. This difference in species sensitivity to lymphocytolysis is not well understood but may be related to the relative maturity of the lymphocyte populations studied in the different species.
Although human lymphocytes are generally more resistant to lymphocytolysis, certain subpopulations do apoptose in response to glucocorticoids. These include cortical and medullary thymocytes, mature Th cells, natural killer cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and immature B cells.81 More importantly, several malignant hematopoietic cells are sensitive to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. These include multiple myeloma,194 acute lymphoblastic leukemia,195 chronic lymphocytic leukemia,196 and acute myeloid leukemia.197 Several investigators have demonstrated that some human leukemic cells, notably acute and chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia, show morphologic and biochemical signs of apoptosis upon death.196,197 Immunophenotyping of leukemic cells to determine the maturity and lineage of these neoplastic lymphocytes may be a promising means of predicting whether the malignancy will respond to glucocorticoid treatment by undergoing apoptosis.
The difference between normal and malignant human lymphocytes that causes the increased susceptibility of malignant cells to apoptosis is unknown. Targeted apoptosis is developing into an important tool in the repertoire of cancer therapy techniques. Much study remains to be done on the phenomenon of apoptosis to determine the mechanism and specificity of this therapeutically useful process.
References
- 1.
- Addison T. On the constitutional and local effects of disease of the suprarenal capsules. London: Samual Highly; 1855.
- 2.
- Brown-Séquard C E. Recherches experimentales sur la physiologie et la pathologie des capsules surrénales. C R Acad Sci D (Paris). 1856;43:422.
- 3.
- Britton S W, Silvette H. Some effects of corticoadrenal extract and other substances on adrenalectomized animals. Am J Physiol. 1931;99:15–32.
- 4.
- Harrop G A, Soffer L J, Ellsworth R, Trescher J H. Studies on the suprarenal cortex. III. Plasma electrolytes and electrolyte excretion during suprarenal insufficiency in the dog. J Exp Med. 1933;58:17–38. [PMC free article: PMC2132275] [PubMed: 19870179]
- 5.
- Cushing H. The basophil adenomas of the pituitary body and their clinical manifestations. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1932;50:137–195.
- 6.
- Bell P H, Howard K S, Shepherd R G. et al. Studies with corticotropin. II. Pepsin degradation of β-corticotropin. J Am Chem Soc. 1956;78:5059–5066.
- 7.
- Li C H, Evans H M, Simpson M E. Adrenocorticotropic hormone. J Biol Chem. 1943;149:413–424.
- 8.
- Ingle D J, Higgins G M, Kendall E C. Atrophy of the adrenal cortex in the rat produced by administration of large amounts of cortin. Anat Rec. 1938;71:363–372.
- 9.
- Hench P S, Kendall E C, Slocumb C H, Polley H F. The effect of a hormone of the adrenal cortex (17-hydroxy-11-dehydrocorticosterone; compound E) and of pituitary adrenocorticotropic hormone on rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1949;24:181–197. [PubMed: 18118071]
- 10.
- Kimura T, Suzuki K. Components of the electron transport system in adrenal steroid-hydroxylase. Isolation and properties of non-heme iron protein (adrenodoxin). J Biol Chem. 1967;242:485–491. [PubMed: 4381523]
- 11.
- Gwynne J T, Strauss J F III. The role of lipoprotein in steroidogenesis and cholesterol metabolism in steroidogenic glands. Endocr Rev. 1982;3:299–329. [PubMed: 6288367]
- 12.
- Haynes R C Jr. The activation of adrenal phosphorylase by the adrenocorticotropic hormone. J Biol Chem. 1958;233:1220–1222. [PubMed: 13598765]
- 13.
- Brown M S, Kovanen P T, Goldstein J L. Receptor-mediated uptake of lipoprotein-cholesterol and its utilization for steroid synthesis in the adrenal cortex. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1979;35:215–257. [PubMed: 229524]
- 14.
- Gwynne J T, Mahaffee D, Brewer H B, Ney R L. Adrenal cholesterol uptake from plasma lipoproteins; regulation by corticotropin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1976;73:4329–4333. [PMC free article: PMC431445] [PubMed: 188033]
- 15.
- Simpson E R, Mason J I, John M E. et al. Regulation of the biosynthesis of steroidogenic enzymes. J Steroid Biochem. 1987;27:801–805. [PubMed: 2826909]
- 16.
- Grossman A, Perry L, Schally A V. et al. New hypothalamic hormone, corticotropin-releasing factor, specifically stimulates the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol in man. Lancet. 1982;1:921–922. [PubMed: 6122767]
- 17.
- Gann D S, Dallman M F, Engleland W C. Reflex control and modulation of ACTH and corticosteroids. Int Rev Physiol. 1981;24:157–199. [PubMed: 6266974]
- 18.
- Marx C, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, Scherbaum W A, Bornstein S R. Regulation of adrenocortical function by cytokines—relevance for immune-endocrine interaction. Horm Metab Res. 1998;30(6-7):416–420. [PubMed: 9694572]
- 19.
- Weitzman E D, Fukushima D, Nogeire C. et al. Twenty-four hour pattern of the episodic secretion of cortisol in normal subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1971;33:14–22. [PubMed: 4326799]
- 20.
- Czeisler C A, Ede M C M, Regenstein Q R. et al. Episodic 24-hour cortisol secretory patterns in patients awaiting elective cardiac surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976;42:273–283. [PubMed: 1262431]
- 21.
- George J M, Reier C E, Lanese R R, Rower J M. Morphine anesthesia blocks cortisol and growth hormone response to surgical stress in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974;38:736–741. [PubMed: 4823919]
- 22.
- Vaughan G M, Becker R A, Allen J P. et al. Cortisol and corticotrophin in burned patients. J Trauma. 1982;22:263–273. [PubMed: 6281451]
- 23.
- Copinschi G, L’Hermite M, LeClerq R. et al. Effects of glucocorticoids on pituitary hormone responses to hypoglycemia. Inhibition of prolactin release. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1975;40:442–449. [PubMed: 163844]
- 24.
- Davis JD. Regulation of aldosterone secretion. In: The adrenal cortex. Eisenstein AB, editor. Boston: Little, Brown; 1967.
- 25.
- Lumbers E R. Angiotensin and aldosterone. Regulatory Peptides. 1999;80(3):91–100. [PubMed: 10425651]
- 26.
- Blair-West J R, Coghlan J P, Denton D A. et al. A dose-response comparison of the actions of angiotensin II and angiotensin III in sheep. J Endocrinol. 1980;87:409–417. [PubMed: 7452126]
- 27.
- Wagner C, Kurtz A. Regulation of renal renin release. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1998;7(4):437–441. [PubMed: 9690044]
- 28.
- New M I, Seaman M P, Peterson R E. A method for the simultaneous determination of the secretion rates of cortisol, 11-desoxycortisol, corticosterone, 11-desoxycorticosterone and aldosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1969;29:514–522. [PubMed: 4888565]
- 29.
- Bondy PK. The adrenal cortex. In: Metabolic control and disease, 8th ed. Bondy PK, Rosenberg LE, editors. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1980; p.1427–1499.
- 30.
- Scurry M T, Sheart L. Stop-flow analysis of the reabsorption of cortisol. Endocrinology. 1969;84:681–682. [PubMed: 5773163]
- 31.
- Manni A. Clinical use of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancers. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1993;17G:242–246. [PubMed: 8007705]
- 32.
- Cheng S C, Harding B W, Carballeira A. Effects of metyrapone on pregnenolone biosynthesis and on cholesterol-cytochrome P-450 interaction in the adrenal. Endocrinology. 1974;94:1451–1458. [PubMed: 4823520]
- 33.
- Touitou Y, Bogdan A, Legrand J C, Desgrez P. Aminoglutethimide and glutethimide’s effects on 18-hydroxycorticosterone biosynthesis by human and sheep adrenals in vitro. Acta Endocrinol. 1975;80:517–526. [PubMed: 1242566]
- 34.
- Mikosha A S, Kostyuchenko N N, Pushkarev V M. In vitro effects of adrenocorticolytic drug, mitotane, on the responses of guinea pig adrenal tissue to different K+ concentrations. Experi Oncol. 1999;21(1):64–69.
- 35.
- Friedrichs K, Holzel F, Janicke F. New aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 1999;59(6):245–254.
- 36.
- Ito S, Kusunoki Y, Oka T. et al. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose methylprednisolone in children. Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1992;19:99–105. [PubMed: 1340442]
- 37.
- Lew K H, Ludwig E A, Milad M A. et al. Gender-based effects on methylprednisolone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993;54:402–414. [PMC free article: PMC4207261] [PubMed: 8222483]
- 38.
- Kaplan S A, Nagareda Shimizu C S. Effects of cortisol on amino acids in skeletal muscle and plasma. Endocrinology. 1963;72:267–272. [PubMed: 13962363]
- 39.
- Rizza R A, Mandarino L J, Gerich J E. Cortisol-induced insulin resistance in man: impaired suppression of glucose production and stimulation of glucose utilization due to a postreceptor defect of insulin action. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982;54:131–138. [PubMed: 7033265]
- 40.
- Lecocq F R, Mebane D, Madison L L. The acute effect of hydrocortisone on hepatic glucose output and peripheral glucose utilization. J Clin Invest. 1964;43:237–246. [PMC free article: PMC289517] [PubMed: 14162532]
- 41.
- Rimsza M E. Complications of corticosteroid therapy. Am J Dis Child. 1978;132:806–810. [PubMed: 356588]
- 42.
- Miller L K, Kral J G, Strain G W, Zumoff B. Differential binding of dexamethasone to ammonium sulfate precipitates of human adipose tissue cytosols. Steroids. 1987;49:507–522. [PubMed: 3453560]
- 43.
- Fain JN, Czech MP. Glucocorticoid effects on lipid mobilization and adipose tissue metabolism. In: Adrenal gland, Vol 6. Sect 7: Endocrinology. Handbook of physiology. Blashko H, editor. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society; 1975. p. 169.
- 44.
- Shafrir E, Steinberg D. The essential role of the adrenal cortex in the response of plasma free fatty acids, cholesterol and phospholipids to epinephrine injection. J Clin Invest. 1960;39:310–319. [PMC free article: PMC441809] [PubMed: 14445377]
- 45.
- Mulrow P J, Forman B H. The tissue effects of mineralocorticoids. Am J Med. 1972;53:561–572. [PubMed: 4263467]
- 46.
- Winter D C, Schneider M F, O’Sullivan G C. et al. Rapid effects of aldosterone on sodium-hydrogen exchange in isolated colonic crypts. J Membr Biol. 1999;170(1):17–26. [PubMed: 10398757]
- 47.
- Marver D. Aldosterone action in target epithelia. Vitam Horm. 1980;38:55–117. [PubMed: 6182690]
- 48.
- Kobayashi O, Wada H, Utsumi J. Urinary lithiasis in children treated with adrenocorticosteroid hormone. Acta Med Biol. 1967;15:91–105. [PubMed: 5588374]
- 49.
- Foster E S, Zimmerman T W, Hayslett J P, Binder H J. Corticosteroid alteration of active electrolyte transport in rat distal colon. Am J Physiol. 1983;245:G668–G675. [PubMed: 6638191]
- 50.
- Blair-West JR, Coghlan JP, Denton DA, et al. The effect of adrenal corticoid steroids on parotid salivary secretion. In: Salivary glands and their secretions. Proceedings of International Conference, Washington, DC, August 1962. New York: Pergamon; 1964. p. 253. [PubMed: 14170725]
- 51.
- Charney A N, Kinsey M D, Myers L. et al. Na1-K1-activated adenosine triphosphatase and intestinal electrolyte transport. J Clin Invest. 1975;56:653–660. [PMC free article: PMC301913] [PubMed: 125764]
- 52.
- Messer J, Reitman D, Sacks H. et al. Association of adrenocorticosteroid therapy and peptic ulcer disease. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:21–25. [PubMed: 6343871]
- 53.
- Bridson W E, Kohler P O. Cortisol stimulation of growth hormone production by human pituitary tissue in culture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1970;30:538–540. [PubMed: 5435293]
- 54.
- Stiel J N, Island D P, Liddle G W. Effect of glucocorticoids on plasma growth hormone in man. Metabolism. 1970;19:158–164. [PubMed: 4903728]
- 55.
- Lucky A W. Principles of the use of glucocorticoids in the growing child. Pediatr Dermatol. 1984;1:226–235. [PubMed: 6387667]
- 56.
- Wilber J F, Utiger R D. The effect of glucocorticoids on thyrotropin secretion. J Clin Invest. 1969;48:2096–2103. [PMC free article: PMC297463] [PubMed: 4980930]
- 57.
- Burr W A, Ramsden D B, Griffiths R S. et al. Effect of a single dose of dexamethasone on serum concentrations of thyroid hormones. Lancet. 1976;2:58–61. [PubMed: 59147]
- 58.
- Sakakura M, Takebe K, Nakagawa S. Inhibition of leutinizing hormone secretion by synthetic LHRH by long-term treatment with glucocorticoids in human subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1975;40:774–779. [PubMed: 1092709]
- 59.
- Ellul-Micallef R, Fenech F F. Effect of intravenous prednisolone in asthmatics with diminished adrenergic responsiveness. Lancet. 1975;2:1269–1271. [PubMed: 54795]
- 60.
- Eberlein W R, Bongiovanni A M, Rodriguez C S. Diagnosis and treatment: the complications of steroid treatment. Pediatrics. 1967;40:279–282. [PubMed: 5006591]
- 61.
- Krakoff L R. Glucocorticoid excess syndromes causing hypertension. Cardiol Clin. 1988;6:537–545. [PubMed: 3067845]
- 62.
- GomezSanchez E P. Central hypertensive effects of aldosterone. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1997;18(4):440–462. [PubMed: 9344633]
- 63.
- David D S, Grieco M H, Cushman P Jr. Adrenal glucocorticoids after twenty years—a review of their clinically relevant consequences. J Chronic Dis. 1970;22:637–711. [PubMed: 5006493]
- 64.
- Mandel S. Steroid myopathy. Insidious cause of muscle weakness. Postgrad Med. 1982;72:207–210. 213–215. [PubMed: 7134072]
- 65.
- Ringe J D. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Clin Rheumatol. 1989;8(Suppl 2):109–115. [PubMed: 2667865]
- 66.
- Richards J M, Santiago S M, Klanstermeyer W B. Aseptic necrosis of the femoral head in corticosteroid-treated pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med. 1980;140:1473–1475. [PubMed: 7436643]
- 67.
- Chan-Lam D, Prentice A G, Copplestone J A. et al. Avascular necrosis of bone following intensified steroid therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and high-grade malignant lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 1994;86:227–230. [PubMed: 8011540]
- 68.
- Lupien S J, Nair N P V, Briere S. et al. Increased cortisol levels and impaired cognition in human aging: implication for depression and dementia in later life. Rev Neurosci. 1999;10(2):117–139. [PubMed: 10658955]
- 69.
- Carpenter W T Jr, Gruen P H. Cortisol’s effects on human mental functioning. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1982;2:91–101. [PubMed: 7042773]
- 70.
- Hall R C W, Popkin M K, Stickney S K, Gardner E R. Presentation of the steroid psychoses. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979;167:229–236. [PubMed: 438794]
- 71.
- Weisberg L A, Chatorian A M. Pseudotumor cerebri of childhood. Am J Dis Child. 1977;131:1243–1248. [PubMed: 920674]
- 72.
- Pountain G D, Keogan M T, Hazleman B L, Brown D L. Effect of single dose compared with three days’ prednisolone treatment of healthy volunteers: contrasting effects on circulating lymphocyte subsets. J Clin Pathol. 1993;46:1089–1092. [PMC free article: PMC501716] [PubMed: 7904272]
- 73.
- Schwartzman R A, Cidlowski J A. Glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of lymphoid cells. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1994;105:347–354. [PubMed: 7981603]
- 74.
- Parrillo J E, Fauci A S. Mechanisms of glucocorticoid action on immune processes. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1979;19:179–201. [PubMed: 222199]
- 75.
- Cronstein B N. The pharmacology of antiinflammatory agents: a new paradigm. Mt Sinai J Med. 1993;60:209–217. [PubMed: 8345848]
- 76.
- Balow J E, Rosenthal A S. Glucocorticoid suppression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J Exp Med. 1973;137:1031–1041. [PMC free article: PMC2139222] [PubMed: 4693151]
- 77.
- Granelli-Piperno A, Vassali J D, Reich E. Secretion of plasminogen activator by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Modulation by glucocorticoids and other effectors. J Exp Med. 1977;146:1693–1706. [PMC free article: PMC2181898] [PubMed: 200699]
- 78.
- Saavedra-Delgado A M, Mathews K P, Pan P M. et al. Dose-response studies of the suppression of whole blood histamine and basophil counts by prednisone. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1980;66:464–471. [PubMed: 7430504]
- 79.
- Skubitz K M, Craddock P R, Hammerschmidt D E, August J T. Corticosteroids block binding of chemotactic peptide to its receptor on granulocytes and cause disaggregation of granulocyte aggregates in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1981;68:13–20. [PMC free article: PMC370767] [PubMed: 7251857]
- 80.
- Gillis S, Crabtree G R, Smith K A. Glucocorticoid-induced inhibition of T cell growth factor. J Immunol. 1979;123:1632–1638. [PubMed: 158054]
- 81.
- Grayson J, Dooley N J, Koski I R, Blaese R M. Immunoglobulin production induced in vitro by glucocorticoid hormones. T cell-dependent stimulation of immunoglobulin production without B cell proliferation in cultures of human peripheral lymphocytes. J Clin Invest. 1981;68:1539–1547. [PMC free article: PMC370958] [PubMed: 7033287]
- 82.
- Caren L D, Rosenberg L T. Steroids and serum complement in mice: influence of hydrocortisone, diethylstilbestrol, and testosterone. Science. 1966;152:782–783. [PubMed: 17797455]
- 83.
- Lubkin V L. Steroid cataract—a review and a conclusion. J Asthma Res. 1977;14:55–59. [PubMed: 324969]
- 84.
- Giles C L. The ocular complications of steroid therapy. Mich Med. 1967;66:298–301. [PubMed: 6039471]
- 85.
- Truhan A P, Ahmed A R. Corticosteroids: a review with emphasis on complications of prolonged systemic therapy. Ann Allergy. 1989;62:375–391. [PubMed: 2655506]
- 86.
- Trattner A, Hodak E, David M, Sandbank M. The appearance of Kaposi sarcoma during corticosteroid therapy. Cancer. 1993;72:1779–1783. [PubMed: 8348508]
- 87.
- Walsh T J, Lee J W, Roilides E, Pizzo P A. Recent progress and current problems in management of invasive fungal infections in patients with neoplastic diseases. Curr Opin Oncol. 1992;4:647–655. [PubMed: 1511021]
- 88.
- Heilman F R, Kendall E C. The influence of 11-dehydro-17-hydroxycorticosterone (compound E) on the growth of malignant tumor in the mouse. Endocrinology. 1944;34:416–426.
- 89.
- Vollmer E P. A viewpoint on animal tumors as test systems for steroids. In: Hormonal steroids, biochemistry, pharmacology, and therapeutics. Proc First Int Cong Horm Steroids. 1965;2:351.
- 90.
- Baxter G D, Collins R J, Harmon B V. et al. Cell death by apoptosis in acute leukemia. J Pathol. 1989;158:123–129. [PubMed: 2754542]
- 91.
- Rosen J M, Fina J J, Millholland R J, Rosen F. Inhibition of glucose uptake in lymphosarcoma 1798 by cortisol and its relationship to the biosynthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:2074–2080. [PubMed: 5467455]
- 92.
- Cohen JJ. Lymphocyte death induced by glucocorticoids. In: Schleimer RP, Claman HN, Oronsky AL, editors. Anti-inflammatory steroid action: basic and clinical aspects. San Diego: Academic Press; 1989. p. 110.
- 93.
- Vietti T J, Sullivan M P, Berry D H. et al. The response of acute childhood leukemia to an initial and a second course of prednisone. J Pediatr. 1965;66:18–26. [PubMed: 14250052]
- 94.
- Koizumi S, Fujimoto T. Improvement in treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a 10-year study by the Children’s Cancer and Leukemia Study Group. Int J Hematol. 1994;59:99–112. [PubMed: 8018909]
- 95.
- Yang C P, Lin S T, Liang D C. et al. Treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with protocol TCL-842 in Taiwan: the Taiwan Children’s Cancer Study Group. J Formos Med Assoc. 1993;92:431–439. [PubMed: 8104596]
- 96.
- Bassan R, Battista R, Montaldi A. et al. Reinforced HEAV’D therapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: improved results and revised prognostic criteria. Hematol Oncol. 1993;11:169–177. [PubMed: 8144131]
- 97.
- Todeschini G, Meneghini V, Pizzolo G. et al. Relationship between daunorubicin dosage delivered during induction therapy and outcome in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 1994;8:376–381. [PubMed: 8127142]
- 98.
- Nagura E, Kimura K, Yamada K. et al. Nation-wide randomized comparative study of doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone combination therapy with and without L-asparaginase for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;33:359–365. [PubMed: 8306408]
- 99.
- Bassan R, Battista R, Viero P. et al. Intensive therapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: preliminary results of the idarubicin/vincristine/L-asparaginase/prednisolone regimen. Semin Oncol. 1993;20(Suppl 8):39–46. [PubMed: 7507263]
- 100.
- Thyss A, Suciu S, Bertrand Y. et al. Systemic effect of intrathecal methotrexate during the initial phase of treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(5):1824–1830. [PubMed: 9164191]
- 101.
- Sabbath K D, Weitberg A B, Calabresi P. Potentially curable neoplasms. Dis Mon. 1986;32:593–652. [PubMed: 3311668]
- 102.
- Winick N J, Smith S D, Shuster J. et al. Treatment of CNS relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:271–278. [PubMed: 8426204]
- 103.
- Buhrer C, Hartmann R, Fengler R. et al. Importance of effective central nervous system therapy in isolated bone marrow relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster) Relapse Study Group. Blood. 1994;83:3468–3472. [PubMed: 8204875]
- 104.
- Martino R, Brunet S, Sureda A. et al. Treatment of refractory and relapsed adult acute leukemia using a uniform chemotherapy protocol. Leuk Lymphoma. 1993;11:393–398. [PubMed: 8124212]
- 105.
- Ryalls M R, Pinkerton C R, Meller S T. et al. High-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate as a single agent in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1992;20:119–123. [PubMed: 1734216]
- 106.
- Yetgin S, Gurgey A, Tuncer A M. et al. A comparison of the effect of high-dose methylprednisolone with conventional-dose prednisolone in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with randomization. Leuk Res. 1998;22(6):485–493. [PubMed: 9678714]
- 107.
- Lowenthal R M, Jestrimski K W. Corticosteroid drugs: their role in oncological practice. Med J Aust. 1986;144:81–85. [PubMed: 2417096]
- 108.
- Steuber C P, Civin C, Krischer J. et al. A comparison of induction and maintenance therapy for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia in childhood: results of a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:247–258. [PubMed: 1988573]
- 109.
- Nagura E, Kimura K, Yamada K. et al. Nationwide randomized comparative study of daunorubicin and aclarubicin in combination with behenoyl cytosine arabinoside, 6-mercaptopurine, and prednisolone for previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;34:23–29. [PubMed: 8174198]
- 110.
- French Cooperative Group. Therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Results from the French cooperative trials. Nouv Rev Fr Hematol. 1988;30(5-6):443–448. [PubMed: 3065741]
- 111.
- Binet J L. Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. French Co-operative Group on CLL. Bailleres Clin Haematol. 1993;6:867–878. [PubMed: 8038494]
- 112.
- Anonymous Is the CHOP regimen a good treatment for advanced CLL? Results from two randomized clinical trials. French Cooperative Group on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 1994;13:449–456. [PubMed: 8069190]
- 113.
- O’Brien S, Kantarjian H, Beran M. et al. Results of fludarabine and prednisone therapy in 264 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with multivariate analysis-derived prognostic model for response to treatment. Blood. 1993;82:1695–1700. [PubMed: 8400226]
- 114.
- Keating M J, O’Brien S, Robertson L. et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia—correlation of response and survival. Leuk Lymphoma. 1993;11(Suppl 2):167–175. [PubMed: 8124227]
- 115.
- Anonymous Comparison of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/prednisone, and cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone in advanced forms of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: preliminary results of a controlled clinical trial. The French Cooperative Group on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Tumori. 1993;79:195–197. [PubMed: 8235691]
- 116.
- Johnson L E. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Am Fam Physician. 1988;38:167–176. [PubMed: 3057841]
- 117.
- Hall T C, Choi O S, Abadi A, Krant M J. High-dose corticoid therapy in Hodgkin’s disease and other lymphomas. Ann Intern Med. 1967;66:1144–1153. [PubMed: 5338940]
- 118.
- DeVita V T, Serpick A A, Carbone P P. Combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Intern Med. 1970;73:881–895. [PubMed: 5525541]
- 119.
- Bonadonna G, Santoro A, Bonfante V, Valagussa P. Cyclic delivery of MOPP and ABVD in stage IV Hodgkin’s disease: rationale, background studies, and recent results. Cancer Treat Rep. 1982;66:881–887. [PubMed: 6176323]
- 120.
- Noordijk E M, Carde P, Mandard A M. et al. Preliminary results of the EORTC-GPMC controlled clinical trial H7 in early-stage Hodgkin’s disease. EORTC Lymphoma Cooperative Group. Groupe Pierre-et-Marie-Curie. Ann Oncol. 1994;5(Suppl 2):107–112. [PubMed: 7515643]
- 121.
- Climino G, Biti G P, Cartoni C, Magrini S M. Chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in early-stage Hodgkin’s disease: evidence of a more difficult rescue for patients relapsed after chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A:1853–1855. [PubMed: 1389525]
- 122.
- Tormo M, Terol L, Marugan I. et al. Treatment of Stage I and II Hodgkin’s disease with NOVP (mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, prednisone) and radiotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma. 1999;34(1-2):137–142. [PubMed: 10350341]
- 123.
- Canellos G P, Anderson J R, Propert K J. et al. Chemotherapy of advanced Hodgkin’s disease with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP alternating with ABVD. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1478–1484. [PubMed: 1383821]
- 124.
- Cullen M H, Stuart N S, Woodroffe C. et al. ChlVPP/PABlOE and radiotherapy in advanced Hodgkin’s disease. The Central Lymphoma Group. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:779–787. [PubMed: 7512132]
- 125.
- Somers R, Carde P, Henry-Amar M. et al. A randomized study in stage IIIB and IV Hodgkin’s disease comparing eight courses of MOPP versus an alteration of MOPP with ABVD: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Cooperative Group and Groupe Pierre-et-Marie-Curie controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:279–287. [PubMed: 7509381]
- 126.
- Pfreundschuh M G, Rueffer U, Lathan B. et al. Dexa-BEAM in patients with Hodgkin’s disease refractory to multidrug chemotherapy regimens: a trial of the German Hodgkin’s Disease Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:580–586. [PubMed: 8120557]
- 127.
- Fairey A F, Mead G M, Jones H W. et al. CAPE/PALE salvage chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease patients relapsing within 1 year of ChlVPP chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 1993:857–860. [PubMed: 8117605]
- 128.
- Smith M R, Khanuja P S, al-Katib A. et al. Continuous infusion ABDIC therapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer. 1994;73:1264–1269. [PubMed: 7508818]
- 129.
- Longo D L, Hathorn J. Current therapy for diffuse large-cell lymphoma. Prog Hematol. 1987;15:115–136. [PubMed: 3332388]
- 130.
- Juliusson G, Abrahamsen A F, Cavallin-Stahl E. et al. Management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in adults in Scandinavia, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. Acta Oncol. 1989;28:135–140. [PubMed: 2650721]
- 131.
- Santoro A, Balzarotti M, Tondini C. et al. Dose-Escalation of CHOP in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 1999;10(5):519–525. [PubMed: 10416000]
- 132.
- Solal-Celigny P, Lepage E, Brousse N. et al. Recombinant interferon alpha-2b combined with a regimen containing doxorubicin in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma. Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1608–1614. [PubMed: 8232429]
- 133.
- Meakin J W, Allt W E C, Beale F A. Ovarian irradiation and prednisone following surgery and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1983;3(Suppl):S45–S48. [PubMed: 6367860]
- 134.
- Oken M M. Standard treatment of multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69:781–786. [PubMed: 8035637]
- 135.
- Barlogie B, Smith L, Alexanian R. Effective treatment of advanced multiple myeloma refractory to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:1353–1356. [PubMed: 6546971]
- 136.
- Barlogie B, Vesole D H, Jagannath S. Salvage therapy for multiple myeloma: the University of Arkansas experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69:787–795. [PubMed: 8035638]
- 137.
- Alexanian R, Dimopoulos M A, Delasalle K, Barlogie B. Primary dexamethasone treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood. 1992;80:887–890. [PubMed: 1498331]
- 138.
- Cunningham D, Paz-Ares L, Milan S. et al. High-dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation in previously untreated myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:759–763. [PubMed: 8151319]
- 139.
- Ganjoo R K, Johnson P W, Evans M L. et al. Recombinant interferon-alpha 2b and high dose methyl prednisolone in relapsed and resistant multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol. 1993;11:179–186. [PubMed: 8144132]
- 140.
- Palumbo A, Boccadoro M, Garino L A. et al. Interferon plus glucocorticoids as intensified maintenance therapy prolongs tumor control in relapsed myeloma. Acta Haematol. 1993;90:71–76. [PubMed: 8285021]
- 141.
- Henderson I C, Hayes D F, Come S. et al. New agents and medical treatments for advanced breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 1987;14:34–64. [PubMed: 3547667]
- 142.
- Tormey D C, Gelman R, Band P R. et al. Comparison of induction chemotherapies for metastatic breast cancer. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial. Cancer. 1982;50:1235–1244. [PubMed: 7049347]
- 143.
- Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group. A randomized trial of adjuvant combination chemotherapy with or without prednisone in premenopausal breast cancer patients with metastases in one to three axillary lymph nodes. Cancer Res. 1985;45:4454–4459. [PubMed: 2862995]
- 144.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Adjuvant systemic therapy in premenopausal (CMF, CMFP, CMFPT) and postmenopausal (observation, CMFP and CMFPT) women with node positive breast cancer. In: Adjuvant therapy of cancer, Vol IV. by Jones SE, Salmon SE, editors. Orlando: Grune & Stratton; 1984. p. 359–368.
- 145.
- Tormey D C, Kline J C, Palta M. Short term high density systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1985;5:177–188. [PubMed: 2410072]
- 146.
- De Graaf H, Willemse P H, de Vries E G. et al. Intensive chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transfusion as primary treatment in women with breast cancer and more than five involved axillary lymph nodes. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A:150–153. [PubMed: 8155387]
- 147.
- Carmo-Pereira J, Costa F O, Henriques E. Mitoxantrone, folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and prednisone as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast carcinoma. A phase II study. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A:1814–1816. [PubMed: 8260231]
- 148.
- Grayhack J T, Keeler T C, Kozlowski J M. Carcinoma of the prostate: hormonal therapy. Cancer. 1987;60:589–601. [PubMed: 3297288]
- 149.
- Santen R J, Misbin R I. Aminoglutethimide: review of pharmacology and clinical use. Pharmacotherapy. 1981;1:95–120. [PubMed: 6765487]
- 150.
- Iwanaka T, Tsuchida Y, Hashizume K. et al. Intralesional corticosteroid injection with short-term oral prednisolone for infantile hemangiomas of the eyelid and orbit. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:482–486. [PubMed: 8014798]
- 151.
- Papatestas A E, Pozner J, Genkins G. et al. Prognosis in occult thymomas in myasthenia gravis following transcervical thymectomy. Arch Surg. 1987;122:1352–1356. [PubMed: 3675200]
- 152.
- Park H S, Shin D M, Lee J S. et al. Thymoma. A retrospective study of 87 cases. Cancer. 1994;73:2491–2498. [PubMed: 8174044]
- 153.
- Wang K C, Lee J I, Cho B K. et al. Treatment outcome and prognostic factors of medulloblastoma. J Korean Med Sci. 1994;9:64–73. [PMC free article: PMC3053908] [PubMed: 8068221]
- 154.
- Geyer J R, Zeltzer P M, Boyett J M. et al. Survival of infants with primitive neuroectodermal tumors or malignant ependymomas of the CNS treated with eight drugs in one day: a report from the Childrens Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1607–1615. [PubMed: 8040673]
- 155.
- Tchekmedyian N S. Clinical approaches to nutritional support in cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 1993;5:633–638. [PubMed: 8364079]
- 156.
- Lai Y L, Fang F M, Yeh C Y. Management of anorexic patients in radiotherapy: a prospective randomized comparison of megestrol and prednisolone. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994;9:265–268. [PubMed: 8089543]
- 157.
- Attie M F. Treatment of hypercalcemia. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1989;18:807–828. [PubMed: 2673775]
- 158.
- Edwards M S B, Prados M. Current management of brain stem gliomas. Pediatr Neurosci. 1987;13:309–315. [PubMed: 3332719]
- 159.
- Weissman D E. Glucocorticoid treatment for brain metastases and epidural spinal cord compression: a review. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:543–551. [PubMed: 3280744]
- 160.
- Sorensen S, Helweg-Larsen S, Mouridsen H, Hansen H H. Effect of high-dose dexamethasone in carcinomatous metastatic spinal cord compression treated with radiotherapy: a randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A:22–27. [PubMed: 8142159]
- 161.
- Hildebrand J, Gangji D. Supportive care of neurologic complications. Curr Opin Oncol. 1992;4:632–641. [PubMed: 1380837]
- 162.
- Vech C J, Hovestadt A, Verbiest H B. et al. Dose-effect relationship of dexamethasone on Karnofsky performance in metastatic brain tumors: a randomized study of doses of 4, 8, and 16 mg per day. Neurology. 1994;44:675–680. [PubMed: 8164824]
- 163.
- Wolff J E A, Hauch H, Kuhl J. et al. Dexamethasone increases hepatotoxicity of MTX in children with brain tumors. Anticancer Res. 1998;18(4B):2895–2899. [PubMed: 9713483]
- 164.
- Aapro M S. Corticosteroids as antiemetics. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1988;108:102–111. [PubMed: 3051200]
- 165.
- Aapro M S. Controlling emesis related to cancer therapy. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27:356–361. [PubMed: 1827331]
- 166.
- Tsavaris N, Mylonakis N, Bacoyiannis C. et al. Comparison of ondansentron versus ondansentron plus methylprednisolone as antiemetic prophylaxis during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994;9:254–258. [PubMed: 8089541]
- 167.
- Sorbe B, Hogberg T, Himmelmann A. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron in comparison with a combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone in the control of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A:629–634. [PubMed: 8080678]
- 168.
- Geimer N F, Donegan W L. Role and mechanism of corticosteroid therapy in breast cancer. Rev Endocrine-Related Cancer. 1980;6:189–191.
- 169.
- Canellos GP, Cohen G, Posner M. Pulmonary emergencies in neoplastic disease. In: Yarbro J, editor. Oncologic emergencies. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1981. p.301–322.
- 170.
- Walsh T D, West T S. Controlling symptoms in advanced cancer. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988;296:477–481. [PMC free article: PMC2545054] [PubMed: 2450618]
- 171.
- Breutman D, Harris J. Oncologic emergencies Part I: SVC syndrome, spinal cord compression. J Crit Illness. 1988;3:31.
- 172.
- Zimmermann M, Drings P. Guidelines for therapy of pain in cancer patients. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1984;89:1–12. [PubMed: 6198700]
- 173.
- Spain R C. The case for mitomycin in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncology. 1993;50(Suppl 1):35–50. [PubMed: 8387177]
- 174.
- Liu G T, Glaser J S, Schatz N J. High-dose methylprednisolone and acetazolamide for visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:88–96. [PubMed: 8023881]
- 175.
- Kellendonk C, Tronche F, Reichardt H M. et al. Mutagenesis of the glucocorticoid receptor in mice. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1999;69(1-6):253–259. [PubMed: 10418999]
- 176.
- Burnstein K L, Cidlowski J A. Regulation of gene expression by glucocorticoids. Annu Rev Physiol. 1989;51:683–699. [PubMed: 2540703]
- 177.
- McKay L I, Cidlowski J A. Molecular control of immune/inflammatory responses: interactions between nuclear factor-κB and steroid receptor-signaling pathways. Endocr Rev. 1999;20(4):435–459. [PubMed: 10453354]
- 178.
- Berkovitz G D, Carter K M, Migeon C J, Brown T R. Down-regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in cultured human skin fibroblasts: implications for the regulation of aromatase activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;66:1029–1036. [PubMed: 3360896]
- 179.
- Walton J, Watson B S, Ney R L. Alternate-day versus shorter-interval steroid administration. Arch Intern Med. 1970;126:601–607. [PubMed: 4918711]
- 180.
- Weiss B D. RU486 The progesterone antagonist. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:63–69. [PubMed: 8252138]
- 181.
- Waeber B, Nussberger J, Brunner H R. Clinical applications of antimineralocorticoids. J Steroid Biochem. 1988;31:739–744. [PubMed: 3059064]
- 182.
- Stanley A J, Forrest E H, Dabos K J. et al. Comparison between theophylline and spironolactone in the management of cirrotic ascites: a randomized controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12(4):389–393. [PubMed: 9690731]
- 183.
- Degre S, Detry J M, Unger P. et al. Effects of spironolactone-altizide on left ventricular hypertrophy. Acta Cardiologica. 1998;53(5):261–267. [PubMed: 9922803]
- 184.
- Harmon J M, Thompson E B, Baione U A. Analysis of glucocorticoid-resistant human leukemic cells by somatic cell hybridization. Cancer Res. 1985;45:1587–1593. [PubMed: 2858265]
- 185.
- Sibley C H, Tomkins G M. Mechanisms of steroid resistance. Cell. 1974;2:221–227. [PubMed: 4370191]
- 186.
- Sibley CH, Yamamoto KR. Mouse lymphoma cells: mechanism of resistance to glucocorticoids. In: Glucocorticoid hormone action. Baxter JJ, Rousseau GG, editors. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1979. p.357–376. [PubMed: 492175]
- 187.
- Powers J H, Hillman A G, Tang D C, Harmon J M. Cloning and expression of mutant glucocorticoid receptors from glucocorticoid-sensitive and -resistant human leukemic cells. Cancer Res. 1993;53:4059–4065. [PubMed: 8358735]
- 188.
- Hala M, Hartmann B L, Bock G. et al. Glucocorticoid -receptor- gene defects and resistance to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in human leukemic cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1996;68(5):663–668. [PubMed: 8938150]
- 189.
- Quddus F F, Levanthal B G, Boyet J M. et al. Glucocorticoid receptors in immunological subtypes of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia cells: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. Cancer Res. 1985;45:6482–6486. [PubMed: 3864532]
- 190.
- Homo F, Durant S, Duval D. et al. Glucocorticoid receptors and hormonal responsiveness of human blood and bone-marrow cells in non-lymphocytic leukemia. J Steroid Biochem. 1981;15:479–485. [PubMed: 6951098]
- 191.
- Weiss C, Ho A D, Hiller E. et al. Prognostic significance of glucocorticoid receptor determination in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and immunocytoma—lack of a positive correlation between receptor levels and clinical responsiveness. Leuk Res. 1990;14:327–332. [PubMed: 2332986]
- 192.
- Schwartzman R A, Cidlowski J A. Apoptosis: the biochemistry and molecular biology of programmed cell death. Endocr Rev. 1993;14:133–151. [PubMed: 8325248]
- 193.
- Schwartzman R A, Cidlowski J A. Mechanism of tissue-specific induction of internucleosomal deoxyribonucleic acid cleavage activity and apoptosis by glucocorticoids. Endocrinology. 1993;133:591–599. [PubMed: 8393769]
- 194.
- Barlogie B. Pathophysiology of human multiple myeloma—recent advances and future directions. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1992;182:245–250. [PubMed: 1490361]
- 195.
- Alnemri E S, Fernandes T F, Haldar S. et al. Involvement of Bcl-2 in glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of human pre-B-leukemias. Cancer Res. 1992;52:491–495. [PubMed: 1728422]
- 196.
- Galili U, Leizerowitz R, Moreb J. et al. Metabolic and ultrastructural aspects of the in vitro lysis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by glucocorticoids. Cancer Res. 1982;42:1433–1440. [PubMed: 7060016]
- 197.
- Baxter G D, Harris A W, Tomkins G M, Cohn M. Glucocorticoid receptors in lymphoma cells in culture: relationship to glucocorticoid killing activity. Science. 1971;171:189. [PubMed: 4395230]
- 229.
- Reference not available .
- 230.
- Reference not available .
- Corticosteroids - Holland-Frei Cancer MedicineCorticosteroids - Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...