Molecular Diagnosis
The diagnosis of MERRF is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in one of the genes listed in Table 1 identified by molecular genetic testing.
Note: (1) Pathogenic variants can usually be detected in mtDNA from leukocytes in individuals with typical MERRF; however, the occurrence of "heteroplasmy" in disorders of mtDNA can result in varying tissue distribution of mutated mtDNA. Hence, the pathogenic variant may be undetectable in mtDNA from leukocytes and may be detected only in other tissues, such as buccal mucosa, cultured skin fibroblasts, hair follicles, urinary sediment, or (most reliably) skeletal muscle. (2) Per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics / Association for Molecular Pathology variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (3) Identification of variant(s) of uncertain significance cannot be used to confirm or rule out the diagnosis.
Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing, concurrent or serial single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, exome array, genome sequencing) depending on the phenotype.
Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Individuals with the distinctive findings described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those with a phenotype indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders with seizures and weakness are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (see Option 2).
Option 1
Serial single-gene
testing can be considered if (1) mutation of a particular gene accounts for a large proportion of the condition or (2) clinical findings, laboratory findings, ancestry, or other factors indicate that mutation of a particular gene is most likely.
Targeted analysis. Typically, blood leukocyte DNA is initially screened for pathogenic variants in MT-TK using targeted analysis for the m.8344A>G pathogenic variant, which is present in more than 80% of individuals with typical clinical findings. Note: If no pathogenic variant is found, consider targeted analysis for this pathogenic variant on DNA from buccal mucosa, muscle, or urine sediment.
Entire mitochondrial
genome sequencing that includes the genes in Table 1 and other mtDNA genes of interest (Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype.
A
multigene panel that includes the genes in Table 1 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) may also be considered. Note: (1) The genes included and the sensitivity of multigene panels vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview; thus, clinicians need to determine which multigene panel is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.
Option 2
When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by seizures and weakness, comprehensive
genomic
testing, which does not require the clinician to determine which gene is likely involved, is the best option. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible. Many laboratories require that the clinician specify if the mitochondrial genome should be included as part of the comprehensive genomic testing.
For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.
Table 1.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used in MERRF
View in own window
| Gene 1, 2 | % of MERRF Attributed to Pathogenic Variants in Gene | Proportion of Pathogenic Variants 3 Identified by Sequence Analysis 4 |
|---|
|
MT-TK
| >90% 5 | 100% |
|
MT-TF
| <5% | 100% |
|
MT-TH
|
|
MT-TI
|
|
MT-TL1
|
|
MT-TP
|
|
MT-TS1
|
|
MT-TS2
|
| Unknown 6 | NA | |
- 1.
Genes are listed from most frequent to least frequent genetic cause of MERRF.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, partial-, whole-, or multigene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.
- 5.
- 6.
One child with MERRF had two mtDNA deletions identified in a buccal swab, suggesting an autosomal disorder with multiple mtDNA deletions; however, the causative nuclear gene was not identified [Yorns et al 2012].