Appendix Table G2Strength of evidence for Key Question 1a

DetailsNumber of studiesQuality (Good, Fair, Poor)Consistency (High, Moderate, Low)Directness (Direct or indirect)Precision (High, Moderate, Low)Number of subjectsStrength of evidence
Not relevant0No evidenceNo evidenceNo evidenceNo evidenceNo evidenceInsufficient

Note: Key Question 1a. Does the effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of risk assessment tools differ according to setting?

From: Appendix G, Overall Strength of Evidence Tables

Cover of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment and Prevention: Comparative Effectiveness
Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment and Prevention: Comparative Effectiveness [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 87.
Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.