NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Buckley DI, Ansari M, Butler M, et al. The Refinement of Topics for Systematic Reviews: Lessons and Recommendations From the Effective Health Care Program [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013 Jan.

Cover of The Refinement of Topics for Systematic Reviews

The Refinement of Topics for Systematic Reviews: Lessons and Recommendations From the Effective Health Care Program [Internet].

Show details

References

1.
Report to the President and the Congress. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. www​.hhs.gov/recovery​/programs/cer/cerannualrpt.pdf.
2.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. [May 22, 2012]. www​.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm.
3.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medicare Uses of AHRQ Research Fact Sheet. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Mar, 2002. AHRQ Publication No. 02-P019. www​.ahrq.gov/news/focus/mediuses.htm.
4.
5.
Whitlock E, Lopez SA, Chang S, et al. AHRQ Series Paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective HealthCare program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(5):491–501. [PubMed: 19540721]
6.
Counsell CC. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(5):380–7. [PubMed: 9273830]
7.
Battista RN, Fletcher SW. Making recommendations on preventive practices: methodological issues. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(4 Suppl):53–76. [PubMed: 3079142]
8.
Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(3 Suppl):21–35. [PubMed: 11306229]
9.
Helfand M, Balshem H. AHRQ Series Paper 2: Principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(5):484–90. [PubMed: 19716268]
10.
AHRQ. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010. http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?pageaction=displayProduct&product ID=454.
11.
Helfand M, Balshem H. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods Reference Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Principles in Developing and Applying Guidance. [posted August 2009] http:​//effectivehealthcare​.ahrq.gov/healthInfo​.cfm?infotype=rr&ProcessID=60.
12.
Effective Health Care Program. The Facilitation Primer: Strategies, Tools & Considerations to Get You Started. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. http:​//effectivehealthcare​.ahrq.gov/tasks​/sites/ehc/assets/File​/Facilitation_Primer_20120124.pdf.
13.
Hickam D, Weiss J, Guise JM, et al. Outpatient Case Management for Adults with Medical Illness and Complex Care Needs. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Jan, 2013. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 99. (Prepared by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No.290-2007-10057-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC031-EF. [PubMed: 23346604]
14.
Saha S, Smith B, Totten A, et al. Pressure Ulcer Treatment Strategies: A Comparative Effectiveness Review. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 90. (Prepared by Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC003-EF. Forthcoming.
15.
Lin J, Webber E, Beil T, et al. Fecal DNA Testing in Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Average-Risk Adults. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 52. (Prepared by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC022-EF. www​.effectivehealthcare​.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm. [PubMed: 22457883]
16.
Chou R, Cottrell E, Wasson N, et al. Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Nov, 2012. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 69. (Prepared by Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)-EHC090-EF.
17.
Chou RC, Hartung D, Rahman B, et al. Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Nov, 2012. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 76. (Prepared by Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)-EHC113-1.
18.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Identifying and Managing Nonfinancial Conflicts of Interest for Systematic Reviews, Methods Research Report. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Forthcoming.
19.
Kemper A, Coeytaux R, Sanders G, et al. Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Sep, 2011. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 28. (Prepared by the Duke Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10066-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC039-EF. www​.effectivehealthcare​.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm. [PubMed: 22091470]
20.
Effective Health Care Program. Point-of-Care Testing for HbA1c—Nomination Summary Document Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. www​.effectivehealthcare​.ahrq.gov/ehc/dispositionDocuments​/TND_0318_06-17-2009​.pdf.
21.
Effective Health Care Program. Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Lysosomal Storage Disease—Nomination Summary Document Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. www​.effectivehealthcare​.ahrq.gov/ehc/dispositionDocuments​/TND_0279_03-10-2008​.pdf.
22.
Treadwell J, Tipton K, Oyesanmi O, et al. Surgical Options for Inguinal Hernia: Comparative Effectiveness Review. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Aug, 2012. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 70. (Prepared by the ECRI Institute Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10063.) AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC091-EF. www​.effectivehealthcare​.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm. [PubMed: 22993867]

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (467K)

Related information

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...