NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.
Structured Abstract
Objectives:
To update the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence Report Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies: Volume 6–Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections on quality improvement (QI) strategies to increase adherence to preventive interventions and/or reduce infection rates for central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), surgical site infections (SSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI).
Data Sources:
MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, and Embase® were searched from January 2006 to January 2012 for English-language studies with sample size ≥100 patients, a defined baseline period, and reported statistical analysis for adherence and/or infection rates. Articles from the previous report were screened and those meeting selection criteria were included.
Review Methods:
We sought studies that evaluated the following QI strategies to improve adherence to evidence-based preventive interventions and/or reduce healthcare-associated infection (HAI) rates: audit and feedback; financial incentives, regulation, and policy; organizational change; patient education; provider education; and provider reminder systems. Data were abstracted by a single reviewer and fact-checked by a second. Outcomes were adherence to preventive interventions, infection rates, adverse outcomes, and cost savings. Study quality was assessed using relative rankings based on study design, adequacy of statistical analysis, length of followup, reporting and analysis of baseline and postintervention adherence and infection rates, and implementation of the intervention independent of other QI efforts. Combinations of QI strategies were assessed, not individual strategies. Strength of evidence was judged according to the AHRQ Methods Guide.
Results:
Sixty-one articles yielded 71 analyses at the infection level, including 9 articles (10 analyses) from the 2007 report, which evaluated the use of one or more QI strategies to improve adherence or infection rates and also controlled for confounding or secular trend. Twenty-six analyses were performed on CLABSI, 19 on VAP, 15 on SSI, and 11 on CAUTI. There were 34 analyses on adherence, of which 31 (91%) showed significant improvement. There were 63 analyses of infection rates, of which 42 (67%) showed significant improvement.
Conclusions:
There is moderate strength of evidence across all four infections that both adherence and infection rates improve when either audit and feedback plus provider reminder systems or audit and feedback alone is added to the base strategies of organizational change and provider education. There is low strength of evidence that adherence and infection rates improve when provider reminder systems alone are added to the base strategies. There was insufficient evidence for reduction of HAI in nonhospital settings, cost savings for QI strategies, and the nature and impact of the clinical contextual factors.
Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Technical Expert Panel
- Peer Reviewers
- Executive Summary
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Key Questions 1 and 1a Which QI strategies are effective in improving HAI and adherence to evidence-based preventive interventions?
- Key Question 1b What is the cost, return on investment, or cost-effectiveness of QI strategies to improve HAI?
- Key Question 1c Which factors are associated with the effectiveness of QI strategies?
- Key Question 2 What is the impact of context on the effectiveness of QI strategies?
- Discussion
- References
- Abbreviations
- Appendix A Search Strategy
- Appendix B Excluded Studies
- Appendix C Evidence Tables
- Appendix D Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions Used in Study Selection
- Appendix E Items on Data Abstraction Forms
- Appendix F Overview Tables for Articles Not Included in Analysis
- Appendix G Details of Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services1, Contract No. 290-2007-10058-I. Prepared by: Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center Evidence-based Practice Center, Chicago, IL
Suggested citation:
Mauger Rothenberg B, Marbella A, Pines E, Chopra R, Black ER, Aronson N. Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections. Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 208. (Prepared by the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10058-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)-E012-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. November 2012. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm.
This report is based on research conducted by the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2007-10058-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The information in this report is intended to help health care decisionmakers—patients and clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers, among others—make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information, i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients.
This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.
None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report.
- 1
540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850; www
.ahrq.gov
- Review Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 6: Prevention of Healthcare–Associated Infections)[ 2007]Review Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 6: Prevention of Healthcare–Associated Infections)Ranji SR, Shetty K, Posley KA, Lewis R, Sundaram V, Galvin CM, Winston LG. 2007 Jan
- Review Implementing quality improvement strategies to reduce healthcare-associated infections: A systematic review.[Am J Infect Control. 2014]Review Implementing quality improvement strategies to reduce healthcare-associated infections: A systematic review.Mauger B, Marbella A, Pines E, Chopra R, Black ER, Aronson N. Am J Infect Control. 2014 Oct; 42(10 Suppl):S274-83.
- Review Interventions to improve professional adherence to guidelines for prevention of device-related infections.[Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013]Review Interventions to improve professional adherence to guidelines for prevention of device-related infections.Flodgren G, Conterno LO, Mayhew A, Omar O, Pereira CR, Shepperd S. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28; (3):CD006559. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
- Nurse-driven quality improvement interventions to reduce hospital-acquired infection in the NICU.[Adv Neonatal Care. 2013]Nurse-driven quality improvement interventions to reduce hospital-acquired infection in the NICU.Ceballos K, Waterman K, Hulett T, Makic MB. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Jun; 13(3):154-63; quiz 164-5.
- Review Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 2: Diabetes Care)[ 2004]Review Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 2: Diabetes Care)Shojania KG, Ranji SR, Shaw LK, Charo LN, Lai JC, Rushakoff RJ, McDonald KM, Owens DK. 2004 Sep
- Regionalization of Bioterrorism Preparedness and ResponseRegionalization of Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response
- Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science (Vol. 6: Prevention...Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science (Vol. 6: Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections)
- Management of Acute Otitis Media: UpdateManagement of Acute Otitis Media: Update
- Prediction of Risk for Patients with Unstable AnginaPrediction of Risk for Patients with Unstable Angina
- Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...