NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D, et al., editors. Neuroscience. 2nd edition. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2001.

  • By agreement with the publisher, this book is accessible by the search feature, but cannot be browsed.
Cover of Neuroscience

Neuroscience. 2nd edition.

Show details

The Somatic Sensory Cortex

The axons arising from neurons in the ventral posterior complex of the thalamus project to cortical neurons located primarily in layer IV of the somatic sensory cortex (see Figure 9.7; also see Box A in Chapter 26 for a more detailed description of cortical lamination). The somatic sensory cortex in humans, which is located in the parietal lobe, comprises four distinct regions, or fields, known as Brodmann's areas 3a, 3b, 1, and 2. Although area 3b is generally known as the primary somatic sensory cortex (also called SI), all four areas are involved in processing tactile information. Experiments carried out in nonhuman primates indicate that neurons in areas 3b and 1 respond primarily to cutaneous stimuli, whereas neurons in 3a respond mainly to stimulation of proprioceptors; area 2 neurons process both tactile and proprioceptive stimuli. Mapping studies in humans and other primates show further that each of these four cortical areas contains a separate and complete representation of the body. In these somatotopic maps, the foot, leg, trunk, forelimbs, and face are represented in a medial to lateral arrangement, as shown in Figures 9.8A,B and 9.9.

Figure 9.8. Somatotopic order in the human primary somatic sensory cortex.

Figure 9.8

Somatotopic order in the human primary somatic sensory cortex. (A) Diagram showing the region of the human cortex from which electrical activity is recorded following mechanosensory stimulation of different parts of the body. The patients in the study (more...)

Figure 9.9. The primary somatic sensory map in the owl monkey based, as in Figure 9.

Figure 9.9

The primary somatic sensory map in the owl monkey based, as in Figure 9.8, on the electrical responsiveness of the cortex to peripheral stimulation. Much more detailed mapping is possible in experimental animals than in neurosurgical patients. The enlargement (more...)

Although the topographic organization of the several somatic sensory areas is similar, the functional properties of the neurons in each region and their organization are distinct (Box D). For instance, the neuronal receptive fields are relatively simple in area 3b; the responses elicited in this region are generally to stimulation of a single finger. In areas 1 and 2, however, the majority of the receptive fields respond to stimulation of multiple fingers. Furthermore, neurons in area 1 respond preferentially to particular directions of skin stimulation, whereas many area 2 neurons require complex stimuli to activate them (such as a particular shape). Lesions restricted to area 3b produce a severe deficit in both texture and shape discrimination. In contrast, damage confined to area 1 affects the ability of monkeys to perform accurate texture discrimination. Area 2 lesions tend to produce deficits in finger coordination, and in shape and size discrimination.

Box Icon

Box D

Patterns of Organization within the Sensory Cortices: Brain Modules.

A salient feature of cortical maps, recognized soon after their discovery, is their failure to represent the body in actual proportion. When neurosurgeons determined the representation of the human body in the primary sensory (and motor) cortex, the homunculus (literally, “little man”) defined by such mapping procedures had a grossly enlarged face and hands compared to the torso and proximal limbs (Figure 9.8C). These anomalies arise because manipulation, facial expression, and speaking are extraordinarily important for humans, requiring more central (and peripheral) circuitry to govern them. Thus, in humans, the cervical spinal cord is enlarged to accommodate the extra circuitry related to the hand and upper limb, and as stated earlier, the density of receptors is greater in regions such as the hands and lips. Such distortions are also apparent when topographical maps are compared across species. In the rat brain, for example, an inordinate amount of the somatic sensory cortex is devoted to representing the large facial whiskers that provide a key component of the somatic sensory input for rats and mice (see Boxes B and D), while raccoons overrepresent their paws and the platypus its bill. In short, the sensory input (or motor output) that is particularly significant to a given species gets relatively more cortical representation.

Image ch9f7

By agreement with the publisher, this book is accessible by the search feature, but cannot be browsed.

Copyright © 2001, Sinauer Associates, Inc.
Bookshelf ID: NBK11153

Views

  • Cite this Page
  • Disable Glossary Links

Related information

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...