NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].
Show detailsBibliographic details: Smith-Spangler C, Brandeau ML, Hunter GE, Bavinger JC, Pearson M, Eschbach PJ, Sundaram V, Liu H, Schirmer P, Stave C, Olkin I, Bravata DM. Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives? A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012; 157(5): 348-366. [PubMed: 22944875]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The health benefits of organic foods are unclear.
PURPOSE: To review evidence comparing the health effects of organic and conventional foods.
DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2011), EMBASE, CAB Direct, Agricola, TOXNET, Cochrane Library (January 1966 to May 2009), and bibliographies of retrieved articles.
STUDY SELECTION: English-language reports of comparisons of organically and conventionally grown food or of populations consuming these foods.
DATA EXTRACTION: 2 independent investigators extracted data on methods, health outcomes, and nutrient and contaminant levels.
DATA SYNTHESIS: 17 studies in humans and 223 studies of nutrient and contaminant levels in foods met inclusion criteria. Only 3 of the human studies examined clinical outcomes, finding no significant differences between populations by food type for allergic outcomes (eczema, wheeze, atopic sensitization) or symptomatic Campylobacter infection. Two studies reported significantly lower urinary pesticide levels among children consuming organic versus conventional diets, but studies of biomarker and nutrient levels in serum, urine, breast milk, and semen in adults did not identify clinically meaningful differences. All estimates of differences in nutrient and contaminant levels in foods were highly heterogeneous except for the estimate for phosphorus; phosphorus levels were significantly higher than in conventional produce, although this difference is not clinically significant. The risk for contamination with detectable pesticide residues was lower among organic than conventional produce (risk difference, 30% [CI, -37% to -23%]), but differences in risk for exceeding maximum allowed limits were small. Escherichia coli contamination risk did not differ between organic and conventional produce. Bacterial contamination of retail chicken and pork was common but unrelated to farming method. However, the risk for isolating bacteria resistant to 3 or more antibiotics was higher in conventional than in organic chicken and pork (risk difference, 33% [CI, 21% to 45%]).
LIMITATION: Studies were heterogeneous and limited in number, and publication bias may be present.
CONCLUSION: The published literature lacks strong evidence that organic foods are significantly more nutritious than conventional foods. Consumption of organic foods may reduce exposure to pesticide residues and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.
- Nutritive and health-promoting value of organic vegetables.[Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. ...]Nutritive and health-promoting value of organic vegetables.Sobieralski K, Siwulski M, Sas-Golak I. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2013 Jan-Mar; 12(1):113-23.
- Review A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods.[Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2002]Review A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods.Bourn D, Prescott J. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2002 Jan; 42(1):1-34.
- Pesticide residues in conventionally grown and organic New Zealand produce.[Food Addit Contam Part B Surve...]Pesticide residues in conventionally grown and organic New Zealand produce.Cressey P, Vannoort R, Malcolm C. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. 2009; 2(1):21-6.
- Review Nutritional quality of organic foods: a systematic review.[Am J Clin Nutr. 2009]Review Nutritional quality of organic foods: a systematic review.Dangour AD, Dodhia SK, Hayter A, Allen E, Lock K, Uauy R. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Sep; 90(3):680-5. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
- Review Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses.[Br J Nutr. 2014]Review Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses.Barański M, Srednicka-Tober D, Volakakis N, Seal C, Sanderson R, Stewart GB, Benbrook C, Biavati B, Markellou E, Giotis C, et al. Br J Nutr. 2014 Sep 14; 112(5):794-811. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
- Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives? A systemati...Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives? A systematic review - Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...