BioProject

Connections between the structure of bacterial communities in suppressive soils and potato resistance to common scab (CS) are not well understood. More...

Connections between the structure of bacterial communities in suppressive soils and potato resistance to common scab (CS) are not well understood. In this study, one resistant and one susceptible cultivar were grown in a conducive and suppressive field to assess cultivar resistance × soil suppressiveness interactions. Bacteria and actinobacteria numbers were higher in the conducive soil. Copy numbers of txtB gene (coding for a pathogenicity determinant) were similar in both soils but were higher in the conducive soil (for periderm samples) and in the susceptible cultivar (for conducive soil samples). Taxonomic microarray analysis and Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes amplicon showed that bacterial community differed between resistant vs susceptible cultivar and to a lesser extend between suppressive vs conducive soil. Bacteria participating in soil suppression belonged to Pseudomonadaceae, Bradyrhizobiaceae, Acetobacteraceae and Paenibacillaceae, while resistant cultivars selected a bacterial community resembling that of the suppressive soil, which was enriched in Nitrospirae and Acidobacteria. Thus, the analysis of soil suppressiveness×cultivar resistance interactions enabled to gain new insight to CS control in the field. Less...