Notes:

• 1) This taxonomic name has been effectively published but not validly published under the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Bacteriological Code).
• 2) This taxonomic name has been effectively published but not validly published under the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Bacteriological Code).
• 3) This taxonomic name has been effectively published but not validly published under the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Bacteriological Code).
• 4) This taxonomic name has been effectively published but not validly published under the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Bacteriological Code).
• 5) This taxonomic name has been effectively published but not validly published under the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Bacteriological Code).
• 6) This taxonomic name has been effectively published but not validly published under the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Bacteriological Code).
• 7) This taxonomic name has been effectively published but not validly published under the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Bacteriological Code).
• 8) This taxonomic name has been effectively published but not validly published under the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Bacteriological Code).
• 9) 'Nom. approb.' (= nomen approbatum, = approved name) refers to a name which is included in the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names.

Comments and References:

Hill LR et al. (1984) (reference relating to orthographic revision) Hill, L.R., Skerman, V.B.D., and Sneath, P.H.A. "Corrigenda to the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names edited for the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1984) 34(4):508-511. [No PubMed record available.]

Meyer JM et al. (2007) Meyer, J.-M., Gruffaz, C., Tulkki, T., and Izard, D. "Taxonomic heterogeneity, as shown by siderotyping, of strains primarily identified as Pseudomonas putida." Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. (2007) 57:2543-2556.

Skerman VBD et al. (1980) (Arthrobacter siderocapsulatus) Skerman, V.B.D., McGowan, V., and Sneath, P.H.A. (editors): "Approved lists of bacterial names." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1980) 30:225-420.

Skerman VBD et al. (1980) (Pseudomonas putida) Skerman, V.B.D., McGowan, V., and Sneath, P.H.A. (editors): "Approved lists of bacterial names." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1980) 30:225-420.

Yamamoto S & Harayama S (1998) Yamamoto, S., and Harayama, S. "Phylogenetic relationships of Pseudomonas putida strains deduced from the nucleotide sequences of gyrB, rpoD and 16S rRNA genes." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1998) 48:813-819.

Zhdanov AV & Dubinina GA (1975) Zhdanov, A.V., and Dubinina, G.A. "[Arthrobacter siderocapsulatus isolated from lake water.]" Mikrobiologiya (1975) 44:714-719. [in Russian]

Chum J et al. (2001) Chun, J., Rhee, M.S., Han, J.I., Bae, K.S. "Arthrobacter siderocapsulatus Dubinina and Zhdanov 1975AL is a later subjective synonym of Pseudomonas putida (Trevisan 1889) Migula 1895AL." Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. (2001) 51:169-170

External Information Resources (NCBI LinkOut)

Notes:

Groups interested in participating in the LinkOut program should visit the LinkOut home page.
A list of our current non-bibliographic LinkOut providers can be found here.

Information from sequence entries

Show organism modifiers

Disclaimer: The NCBI taxonomy database is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification - please consult the relevant scientific literature for the most reliable information.

Reference: How to cite this resource - Schoch CL, et al. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database (Oxford). 2020: baaa062. PubMed: 32761142 PMC: PMC7408187.