Taxonomy browser Taxonomy Browser (Staphylococcus haemolyticus)

Entrez records
Database name	Direct links	Subtree links	Links from type
BioProject	290	295	-
BioSample	3,532	3,537	-
Conserved Domains	1	1	-
GEO DataSets	16	37	-
Gene	5,106	10,644	-
Identical Protein Groups	178,237	178,509	-
Nucleotide	130,135	130,440	376
PubChem BioAssay	185	185	-
PMC	3,451	3,451	-
Protein	426,360	431,903	-
SRA	2,509	2,513	-
Structure	7	12	-
Taxonomy	7	7	-

Staphylococcus haemolyticus

Taxonomy ID: 1283 (for references in articles please use ncbitaxon:1283)

current name

Staphylococcus haemolyticus Schleifer and Kloos 1975 (Approved Lists 1980)

type strain of Staphylococcus haemolyticus: ATCC : 29970 , CCUG : 7323 , CIP : 81.56 , DSM : 20263 , JCM : 2416 , BCCM/LMG : 13349 , NCTC : 11042 , NRRL : B-14755 , CCM : 2737 , NBRC : 109768

NCBI BLAST name: firmicutes
Rank: species
Genetic code: Translation table 11 (Bacterial, Archaeal and Plant Plastid)

Lineage(full): cellular organisms; Bacteria; Bacillati; Bacillota; Bacilli; Caryophanales; Staphylococcaceae; Staphylococcus

Comments and References:

Cole K et al. (2019)

Cole, K., Foster, D., Russell, J.E., Golubchik, T., Llewelyn, M., Wilson, D.J., Crook, D., and Paul, J., Modernising Medical Microbiology Consortium. "Draft genome sequences of 64 type strains of 50 species and 25 subspecies of the genus Staphylococcus Rosenbach 1884." Microbiol. Resour. Announc. (2019) 8:e00062-19.

Schleifer KH & Kloos WE (1975)

Schleifer, K.H., and Kloos, W.E. "Isolation and characterization of staphylococci from human skin. I. Amended descriptions of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus,and descriptions of three new species: Staphylococcus cohnii, Staphylococcus haem, and Staphylococcus xylosus." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1975) 25:50-61. [No PubMed record available.]

Skerman VBD et al. (1980)

Skerman, V.B.D., McGowan, V., and Sneath, P.H.A. (editors). "Approved lists of bacterial names." Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1980) 30(1):225-420. [No PubMed record available.]

Disclaimer: The NCBI taxonomy database is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification - please consult the relevant scientific literature for the most reliable information.

Reference: How to cite this resource - Schoch CL, et al. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database (Oxford). 2020: baaa062. PubMed: 32761142 PMC: PMC7408187.