My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 188

    1.

    Integration of QSAR and in vitro toxicology.

    Barratt MD.

    Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 Suppl 2:459-65.PMID: 9599692 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Integrating computer prediction systems with in vitro methods towards a better understanding of toxicology.

    Barratt MD.

    Toxicol Lett. 1998 Dec 28;102-103:617-21.PMID: 10022323 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Promises and pitfalls of quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches for predicting metabolism and toxicity.

    Zvinavashe E, Murk AJ, Rietjens IM.

    Chem Res Toxicol. 2008 Dec;21(12):2229-36. Review.PMID: 19548346 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    On the nature, evolution and future of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology.

    Veith GD.

    SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2004 Oct-Dec;15(5-6):323-30.PMID: 15669692 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Approaches to developing alternative and predictive toxicology based on PBPK/PD and QSAR modeling.

    Yang RS, Thomas RS, Gustafson DL, Campain J, Benjamin SA, Verhaar HJ, Mumtaz MM.

    Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Dec;106 Suppl 6:1385-93. Review.PMID: 9860897 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.

    Valerio LG Jr, Arvidson KB, Chanderbhan RF, Contrera JF.

    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007 Jul 1;222(1):1-16. Epub 2007 Mar 24.PMID: 17482223 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.

    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials.

    Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Review.PMID: 18328408 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Alternative models for toxicity testing of xenobiotics.

    Kniewald J, Kmetic I, Gaurina-Srcek V, Kniewald Z.

    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2005 Jun;56(2):195-204.PMID: 15968836 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    TestSmart-high production volume chemicals: an approach to implementing alternatives into regulatory toxicology.

    Green S, Goldberg A, Zurlo J.

    Toxicol Sci. 2001 Sep;63(1):6-14.PMID: 11509738 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    QSAR models for predicting the acute toxicity of selected organic chemicals with diverse structures to aquatic non-vertebrates and humans.

    Calleja MC, Geladi P, Persoone G.

    SAR QSAR Environ Res. 1994;2(3):193-234.PMID: 8790646 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities.

    Costa DL.

    Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2008 Jun;60(2-3):105-9. Epub 2008 May 16.PMID: 18486462 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Survey of the QSAR and in vitro approaches for developing non-animal methods to supersede the in vivo LD50 test.

    Phillips JC, Gibson WB, Yam J, Alden CL, Hard GC.

    Food Chem Toxicol. 1990 May;28(5):375-94. Review.PMID: 2199353 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Assessment of the eye irritating properties of chemicals by applying alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye test: the use of QSARs and in vitro tests for the classification of eye irritation.

    Gerner I, Liebsch M, Spielmann H.

    Altern Lab Anim. 2005 Jun;33(3):215-37. Review.PMID: 16180977 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: an overview.

    Bradbury SP.

    SAR QSAR Environ Res. 1994;2(1-2):89-104. Review.PMID: 8790641 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Currently available in vitro methods used in the regulatory toxicology.

    Liebsch M, Spielmann H.

    Toxicol Lett. 2002 Feb 28;127(1-3):127-34. Review.PMID: 12052650 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    13th Meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals (SGOMSEC): validation and acute toxicity testing.

    Curren R, Bruner L, Goldberg A, Walum E.

    Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 Suppl 2:419-25.PMID: 9599688 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and application to reactive toxicity.

    Aptula AO, Roberts DW.

    Chem Res Toxicol. 2006 Aug;19(8):1097-105.PMID: 16918251 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Computer-modeling-based QSARs for analyzing experimental data on biotransformation and toxicity.

    Soffers AE, Boersma MG, Vaes WH, Vervoort J, Tyrakowska B, Hermens JL, Rietjens IM.

    Toxicol In Vitro. 2001 Aug-Oct;15(4-5):539-51. Review.PMID: 11566589 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing.

    Piersma AH.

    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006 May;98(5):427-31. Review.PMID: 16635099 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    An alternative approach for the safety evaluation of new and existing chemicals, an exercise in integrated testing.

    Gubbels-van Hal WM, Blaauboer BJ, Barentsen HM, Hoitink MA, Meerts IA, van der Hoeven JC.

    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Aug;42(3):284-95.PMID: 15979772 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity