Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 97

    1.

    The limits of two-year bioassay exposure regimens for identifying chemical carcinogens.

    Huff J, Jacobson MF, Davis DL.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Nov;116(11):1439-42. Epub 2008 Jun 30.PMID: 19057693 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?

    Gaylor DW.

    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Mar;41(2):128-33. Epub 2004 Dec 19.PMID: 15698536 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    The causes and prevention of cancer: the role of environment.

    Ames BN, Gold LS.

    Biotherapy. 1998;11(2-3):205-20. Review.PMID: 9677052 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.

    Battershill JM, Fielder RJ.

    Hum Exp Toxicol. 1998 Apr;17(4):193-205. Review.PMID: 9617631 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    How many high production chemicals are rodent carcinogens? Why should we care? What do we need to do about it?

    Johnson FM.

    Mutat Res. 2003 Jun;543(3):201-15.PMID: 12787813 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Identification of mammary carcinogens in rodent bioassays.

    Bennett LM, Davis BJ.

    Environ Mol Mutagen. 2002;39(2-3):150-7. Review.PMID: 11921183 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Animal carcinogenicity studies: 2. Obstacles to extrapolation of data to humans.

    Knight A, Bailey J, Balcombe J.

    Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Feb;34(1):29-38.PMID: 16522148 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.

    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials.

    Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Review.PMID: 18328408 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Carcinogenesis bioassays: study duration and biological relevance.

    Haseman J, Melnick R, Tomatis L, Huff J.

    Food Chem Toxicol. 2001 Jul;39(7):739-44.PMID: 11397520 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of o-nitrotoluene sulfone (CAS no. 88-72-2) in F344/N rats and B6C3F(1) mice (feed studies).

    National Toxicology Program, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2002 May;(504):1-357.PMID: 12087420 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    Chemicals causing mammary gland tumors in animals signal new directions for epidemiology, chemicals testing, and risk assessment for breast cancer prevention.

    Rudel RA, Attfield KR, Schifano JN, Brody JG.

    Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;109(12 Suppl):2635-66. Review.PMID: 17503434 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.

    Vogel EW, Graf U, Frei HJ, Nivard MM.

    IARC Sci Publ. 1999;(146):427-70. Review.PMID: 10353398 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Alternatives to the 2-species bioassay for the identification of potential human carcinogens.

    Ashby J.

    Hum Exp Toxicol. 1996 Mar;15(3):183-202. Review.PMID: 8839204 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Effect of Dietary Restriction on Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice.

    National Toxicology Program.

    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 1997 Sep;460:1-414.PMID: 12587016 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data