Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 1075

    1.

    Representation and re-presentation in litigation science.

    Jasanoff S.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jan;116(1):123-9.PMID: 18197311 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science.

    Haack S.

    Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S66-73.PMID: 16030341 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    The perils of relying on interested parties to evaluate scientific quality.

    Wagner W.

    Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S99-106.PMID: 16030346 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.

    Merwin SE, Moeller DW, Kennedy WE Jr, Moeller MP.

    Health Phys. 2001 Dec;81(6):670-7.PMID: 11725885 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.

    Cranor C.

    Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S121-8.PMID: 16030327 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.

    Melnick RL.

    Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S30-4.PMID: 16030335 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law.

    Krimsky S.

    Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S129-36. Review.PMID: 16030328 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Law's knowledge: science for justice in legal settings.

    Jasanoff S.

    Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S49-58.PMID: 16030338 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Litigation-generated science: why should we care?

    Boden LI, Ozonoff D.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jan;116(1):117-22.PMID: 18197310 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    The war against junk science: the use of expert panels in complex medical-legal scientific litigation.

    Price JM, Rosenberg ES.

    Biomaterials. 1998 Aug;19(16):1425-32. Review.PMID: 9794513 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform.

    Neufeld PJ.

    Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S107-13.PMID: 16030325 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.

    Cecil JS.

    Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S74-80. Review.PMID: 16030342 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.

    Grivas CR, Komar DA.

    J Forensic Sci. 2008 Jul;53(4):771-6.PMID: 18489550 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    What has a decade of Daubert wrought?

    Berger MA.

    Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S59-65.PMID: 16030340 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    The impact of the Daubert case on modern litigation.

    Mavroforou A, Michalodimitrakis E.

    Med Law. 2008 Dec;27(4):755-65.PMID: 19202854 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Independent judicial research in the Daubert age.

    Cheng EK.

    Duke Law J. 2007 Mar;56(5):1263-318.PMID: 17593589 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.

    Davies J.

    Med Law. 2005 Jun;24(2):243-57.PMID: 16082863 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.

    Masten J, Strzelczyk JJ.

    Health Phys. 2001 Dec;81(6):678-82.PMID: 11725886 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.

    Faigman DL, Monahan J.

    Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:631-59.PMID: 15709949 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.

    Klee CH, Friedman HJ.

    NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16(2):79-85.PMID: 11568465 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data